Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter. Steve Ahlen Boston University

Similar documents
Physics 663. Particle Physics Phenomenology. April 23, Physics 663, lecture 4 1

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2010 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

Interactions of particles and radiation with matter

Chapter 2 Radiation-Matter Interactions

Detectors for High Energy Physics

EP228 Particle Physics

Particle Detectors A brief introduction with emphasis on high energy physics applications

The interaction of radiation with matter

Particle Interactions in Detectors

EEE4101F / EEE4103F Radiation Interactions & Detection

2. Passage of Radiation Through Matter

Experimental Particle Physics

The Physics of Particle Detectors

Interaction of Particles with Matter

energy loss Ionization + excitation of atomic energy levels Mean energy loss rate de /dx proportional to (electric charge) 2 of incident particle

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

2nd-Meeting. Ionization energy loss. Multiple Coulomb scattering (plural and single scattering, too) Tracking chambers

7 Particle Identification. Detectors for Particle Physics Manfred Krammer Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna, Austria

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Appendix A2. Particle Accelerators and Detectors The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland on the Border of France.

Bethe-Block. Stopping power of positive muons in copper vs βγ = p/mc. The slight dependence on M at highest energies through T max

Experimental Particle Physics

Selected Topics in Physics a lecture course for 1st year students by W.B. von Schlippe Spring Semester 2007

Passage of particles through matter

Detection methods in particle physics

Experimental Particle Physics

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 25. Particle Detectors

Examples for experiments that can be done at the T9 beam line

Lecture 2 & 3. Particles going through matter. Collider Detectors. PDG chapter 27 Kleinknecht chapters: PDG chapter 28 Kleinknecht chapters:

Heavy charged particle passage through matter

Particle Acceleration

Y2 Neutrino Physics (spring term 2017)

Tracking detectors for the LHC. Peter Kluit (NIKHEF)

Particle detection 1

Fall Quarter 2010 UCSB Physics 225A & UCSD Physics 214 Homework 1

Interaction of particles with matter - 2. Silvia Masciocchi, GSI and University of Heidelberg SS2017, Heidelberg May 3, 2017

Emphasis on what happens to emitted particle (if no nuclear reaction and MEDIUM (i.e., atomic effects)

Neutron pulse height analysis (R405n)

PHYS 352. Charged Particle Interactions with Matter. Intro: Cross Section. dn s. = F dω

What detectors measure

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 24. Exam 2 Particle Detectors

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 3

EEE4106Z Radiation Interactions & Detection

Particle-Matter Interactions

The Physics of Cosmic Rays

Radioactivity and Ionizing Radiation

CHARGED PARTICLE INTERACTIONS

Particle Energy Loss in Matter

Particle Detectors. How to See the Invisible

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 4

Interaction of particles in matter

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. Lecture 3

Last Lecture 1) Silicon tracking detectors 2) Reconstructing track momenta

Particle Physics Homework Assignment 4

A brief history of accelerators, detectors and experiments: (See Chapter 14 and Appendix H in Rolnick.)

Interaction of Electron and Photons with Matter

Nuclear and Particle Physics 4b Physics of the Quark Gluon Plasma

Electromagnetic and hadronic showers development. G. Gaudio, M. Livan The Art of Calorimetry Lecture II

General Information. Muon Lifetime Update. Today s Agenda. The next steps. Reports due May 14

Experimental Methods of Particle Physics

Chapter NP-4. Nuclear Physics. Particle Behavior/ Gamma Interactions TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 IONIZATION

PHYS 571 Radiation Physics

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

08 - Miscellaneous and historical detectors

Interaction of Particles and Matter

Recent CMS results on heavy quarks and hadrons. Alice Bean Univ. of Kansas for the CMS Collaboration

The ATLAS Experiment and the CERN Large Hadron Collider

Detectors & Beams. Giuliano Franchetti and Alberica Toia Goethe University Frankfurt GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung

Neutrino detection. Kate Scholberg, Duke University International Neutrino Summer School Sao Paulo, Brazil, August 2015

Introduction to Particle Physics I. particle detection. Risto Orava Spring 2017

The LHC Experiments. TASI Lecture 2 John Conway

INTRODUCTION TO IONIZING RADIATION (Attix Chapter 1 p. 1-5)

Particle Detectors. 1. Introductory remarks. 2. Fast response detectors (timing)

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

Calorimeter for detection of the high-energy photons

DETECTORS. I. Charged Particle Detectors

III. Energy Deposition in the Detector and Spectrum Formation

Neutrinos & Weak Interactions

Radiation Detection for the Beta- Delayed Alpha and Gamma Decay of 20 Na. Ellen Simmons

Cosmic Rays. This showed that the energy of cosmic rays was many times that of any other natural or artificial radiation known at that time.

Calorimetry I Electromagnetic Calorimeters

Part II: Detectors. Peter Schleper Universität Hamburg

Signals in Particle Detectors (1/2?)

The Development of Particle Physics. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev E45, Tel.:

Radiation Physics PHYS /251. Prof. Gocha Khelashvili

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Particle Detectors. Summer Student Lectures 2007 Werner Riegler, CERN, History of Instrumentation History of Particle Physics

Detectors for Particle Physics. Lecture 2: Drift detectors Muon detectors MWPC, CSC, RPC, TRT, TPC, Cherenkov

Interaction of Radiation with Matter

Hadronic Showers. KIP Journal Club: Calorimetry and Jets 2009/10/28 A.Kaplan & A.Tadday

Particle Detectors Tools of High Energy and Nuclear Physics Detection of Individual Elementary Particles

Theory English (Official)

The discovery of the antiproton and other antimatter,

1 The pion bump in the gamma reay flux

Interazioni delle particelle cariche. G. Battistoni INFN Milano

Lecture 3. lecture slides are at:

Chapter 6.2: space based cosmic ray experiments. A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics

University of Oslo. Department of Physics. Interaction Between Ionizing Radiation And Matter, Part 2 Charged-Particles.

Interaction with matter

Transcription:

Ionization Energy Loss of Charged Projectiles in Matter Steve Ahlen Boston University

Almost all particle detection and measurement techniques in high energy physics are based on the energy deposited by energetic charged particles in matter by means of atomic excitation and ionization.

Drift chambers for tracking Silicon detectors for vertex Electromagnetic calorimeters Hadronic calorimeters

Examples of the tracks in photographic emulsions of primary nuclei of the cosmic radiation moving at relativistic velocities. Taken from Powell s Nobel Prize lecture.

Projectile Atoms Projectile mass = M = Am u Electron mass = m << M (we assume) Electron charge = e Projectile charge = Z e Target atomic number = Z Target atomic mass = A Projectile velocity = v = βc Projectile Lorentz factor = γ N = number density of electrons

Electrons scatter off projectile in center of mass frame

Rutherford scattering cross section: dσ dω = 4m v q 4 q sin 4 ( Θ ) q = electron charge = e q = projectile charge = Z e m = electron mass v = relative speed Θ== center of mass scattering angle

Mott scattering cross section for electrons off nuclei (lowest order): 4 dσ Z e = m c + p cos dω 4p 4 c sin 4( Θ ) Θ 4 dσ Z e m γ = β sin dω 4p 4 sin 4( Θ ) Θ

Some kinematics Energy transfer to electron in lab frame: ε = mv Θ Θ γ sin = ε sin m Scattered electrons produced in thickness dx in lab: dn dσ dσ = N = N dεdx dε dω ε dσ dn = NAdx A Scattered electron production per unit energy transfer: m πsin Θ Θ sin cos = Θ 4πN ε m dσ dω

Θ β ε ε γ ε π = ε sin 4p m e N Z 4 dx d dn 4 m 4 m ε ε β ε π = ε m 4 mv e NZ dx d dn

Energy loss per path length for large energy transfers (> ε ): de dx >ε = ε ε m ε dn dε dεdx πnz mv e 4 n ε ε m β

de/dx = force exerted on projectile by medium = Z ee

de dx >ε = πnz mv e 4 n ε ε m β de dx <ε = πnz mv e 4 n mv (if below Cherenkov threshold, v < c/n) I γ ε β I = logarithmic average of atomic excitation energies

Bethe Formula: Ann. Physik 5, 35 (930); Z. Phys. 76, 93 (93) de dx = 4πNZ mv e 4 n ε m I β Half the energy is lost in close collisions (small number of events, large energy transfer - delta rays) Half lost in distant collisions (large number, energy lost per collision is about same as ionization energy)

Energy loss expressed per grammage X = ρx ρ = mass density de dx = mv 4πNZ ( m NA Z ) u e 4 n ε m I β Minimum ionization rate (γ= =3): de dx min g MeV cm

Material I (ev) Plastic scintillator 63 Aluminum 63 Iron 85 Lead 85

A nucleus of magnesium or aluminium moving with great velocity, collides with another nucleus in a photographic emulsion. The incident nucleus splits up into six alpha - particles of the same speed and the struck nucleus is shattered.

Delta Ray production: dn dεdx = πnz mv ε e 4 ε de β ρ ε dx 0 ε m dn dx >ε 0. 0 ε g MeV cm

Electron range for electron energy ε: R 0.537ε g cm MeV + 0.985 3.3MeV ε But lots of straggling for electrons

Impact parameter approach for distant collisions γzeb p y = ee y() t dt = e dt 3 ( b + γ v t ) Collision time: t b γv γvt = b tan θ π γzeb b py = e sec θdθ = π Z e ( b b tan ) 3 + θ γv bv

p y = Ze bv de dx dis tan t = b b max min ( p ) y m πnbdb = 4πNZ mv e 4 n b b max min b max γ = v ω Collision time equals oscillation time of electron b min = a 0 Impact parameter approach valid only for distances larger than size of atoms

de dx = 4πNZ mv e 4 n mv I γ β Relativistic rise One γ from increasing impact parameter; The other γ from increase in kinematic limit to energy transfer

Relativistic rise does not continue indefinitely: Density effect - polarization of material screens field of projectile at distant atoms. de 4πNZ e mv γ = n β dx mv I average 4 δ

Asymmetric energy loss fluctuations skew energy loss distribution (Landau distribution). At high energies (γ ~ 0 for solids, 000 for gases), the most probable energy loss in thickness x is: mp ( β = ) = πnz FWHM mp mc = e 4 x n.9z ( 4.0).9Z n a 0 a 0 x x.6 0% g MeV cm

If maximum energy delta ray is small compared to mean energy loss, ε m < 0 de dx x energy loss distribution is nearly gaussian and square of standard deviation of energy loss is: σ = 4πNZ e 4 x ( ) β ( ) β

Some observational examples

Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Geneva, Switzerland proton-proton collisions with 4 trillion electron volts energy

ATLAS

Endcap Muon Chambers made at Harvard (4 so far) Mod-0 - May 7, 000

Mod-0 on Test Stand

Scintillators and Phototubes

BMC Test Stand scintillators Mod-0 XP-00 phototubes concrete

Layer Side View Layer 4 Layer 3 Layer

Shower event if trigger on coincidence of top two scintillators - these are electrons and positrons

Another shower, this one made locally

Single tracks for trigger that includes scintillators above AND below the concrete - these are muons

Scintillator signal vs position from timing mu0690a_f; y_=5 500 000 500 q 000 500 0-400 -300-00 -00 0 00 00 300 400 t - t ( channel = 35 ps)

Landau distribution for one scintillator q mu0690a_f; y_=5; deltb:(90,300) 80 70 60 50 40 30 0 0 0 00 400 600 800 000 00 400

Ionization Measurements and Particle Identification

Range is well defined for muons, pions, nuclei, if energy is not too high R ( ) β + β ( ) = R ( ) B ( ) β proton Z Z M m p nd term is range extension due to electron capture: this is small for small Z or large velocity σ R R % M m p

Range R(Z,A) vs Ionization Range R(Z,A) vs rigidity 0000 000 00 R(,) R(,4) R(,0.) R(,0.4) 0000 000 00 Range (g/cm) 0 0. 0.0 Range (g/cm) 0 0. 0.0 0.00 R(,) R(,4) R(,0.) 0.00 0 5 50 75 00 5 50 0.000 R(,0.4) 0 0. 0. 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 (Z/beta)^ rigidity (A beta gamma/z) Ranges are for air

Discovery of positron in cloud chamber Lead plate thickness = 6 mm Magnetic field = 4000 gauss into picture Dimensions: 7 x 7 x 3 cm Change of curvature implies particle moving up, so charge is positive Track density => Z/β = Aβγ/Z = 0.07 below plate, 0.0 above plate: so A < 0.0 For very low energy particles like these, mass and charge can be measured, showing them to be positrons.

Pion decays in nuclear emulsion Photo-micrographs of four examples of the successive decay π - µ - e as recorded in photographic emulsions. Note that the muon ranges are nearly the same, so they must have same energy when pion decays at rest - a two body decay.

event in bubble chamber * the slow proton is identifed by its heavier ionisation, * the K0 subsequently decays into a pair of charged pions, * the antineutron annihilates with a proton a short distance downstream from the primary interaction, to produce three charged pions, * the neutral pion decays into two photons, which (unusually for a hydrogen chamber) both convert into e+e- pairs, * (external particle detectors were used to identify the charged kaon).

Velocity Measurements are the Most Effective Way to Identify Particles de dx K Z Z β if velocity known Rigidity = Mcβγ Z e M if velocity and charge are known

Scintillator timing can measure time-of-flight to 00 ps Position from scintillator timing compared to drift tube position

Charge Mass E ( ) ( ) MeV amu = 938 β

Cherenkov Radiation if v > c/n: pi = pf + Dk Ei = Ef + ω ω = ck n cosθ C = c n v

Cherenkov Yield: de dx Cherenkov = ω ω Z c e n β ωdω A few hundred photons per cm for n =.5 for typical photo-multiplier tubes

Cherenkov response for roughened.3 cm Pilot 45 radiator in white box for neon nuclei

Ring imaging Cherenkov detectors using small light sensors provide best velocity resolution

Use of relativistic Rise in Gas Ionization Counters From Detection of cosmic-ray antiprotons with the HEAT-pbar instrument (Proceedings of ICRC 00: 69)

At very high energies, transition radiation can determine Lorentz factor