Aerothermodynamics of High Speed Flows

Similar documents
Aerothermodynamics of high speed flows

Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Chapter 13 Compressible Flow. Fox, Pritchard, & McDonald

Module3: Waves in Supersonic Flow Lecture14: Waves in Supersonic Flow (Contd.)

Shock and Expansion Waves

Steady waves in compressible flow

1. (20 pts total 2pts each) - Circle the most correct answer for the following questions.

6.1 According to Handbook of Chemistry and Physics the composition of air is

In which of the following scenarios is applying the following form of Bernoulli s equation: steady, inviscid, uniform stream of water. Ma = 0.

Fundamentals of Gas Dynamics (NOC16 - ME05) Assignment - 10 : Solutions

IX. COMPRESSIBLE FLOW. ρ = P

SPC 407 Sheet 2 - Solution Compressible Flow - Governing Equations

Aerothermodynamics of high speed flows

Rocket Propulsion Prof. K. Ramamurthi Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Lecture-2. One-dimensional Compressible Fluid Flow in Variable Area

AOE 3114 Compressible Aerodynamics

Review of Fundamentals - Fluid Mechanics

HIGH SPEED GAS DYNAMICS HINCHEY

Jet Aircraft Propulsion Prof. Bhaskar Roy Prof. A.M. Pradeep Department of Aerospace Engineering

A New Configuration Of Irregular Reflection Of Shock Waves

Supplemental Notes to the Lecture on Theoretical Analysis of Flow Starting in Hypersonic Air Intakes with CFD Illustrations

Numerical Investigation of Supersonic Nozzle Producing Maximum Thrust For Altitude Variation

NAPC Numerical investigation of axisymmetric underexpanded supersonic jets. Pratikkumar Raje. Bijaylakshmi Saikia. Krishnendu Sinha 1

Experimental Study of Steam Flow in a Convergent-Divergent Nozzle

P 1 P * 1 T P * 1 T 1 T * 1. s 1 P 1

AerE 344: Undergraduate Aerodynamics and Propulsion Laboratory. Lab Instructions. Pressure Measurements in a de Laval Nozzle

1. For an ideal gas, internal energy is considered to be a function of only. YOUR ANSWER: Temperature

Fundamentals of Gas Dynamics (NOC16 - ME05) Assignment - 8 : Solutions

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Second Year - Second Term ( ) Fluid Mechanics & Gas Dynamics

FUNDAMENTALS OF GAS DYNAMICS

Given a stream function for a cylinder in a uniform flow with circulation: a) Sketch the flow pattern in terms of streamlines.

Please welcome for any correction or misprint in the entire manuscript and your valuable suggestions kindly mail us

MODELING & SIMULATION OF ROCKET NOZZLE

Previously, we examined supersonic flow over (sharp) concave corners/turns. What happens if: AE3450

Notes #6 MAE 533, Fluid Mechanics

UNIT 1 COMPRESSIBLE FLOW FUNDAMENTALS

Radial Compressors. Damian Vogt Course MJ2429. Nomenclature

Computational Analysis of Bell Nozzles

Fluid Mechanics - Course 123 COMPRESSIBLE FLOW

The Design and Computational Validation of a Mach 3 Wind Tunnel Nozzle Contour

Uncertainty in airflow field parameters in a study of shock waves on flat plate in transonic wind tunnel

Civil aeroengines for subsonic cruise have convergent nozzles (page 83):

the pitot static measurement equal to a constant C which is to take into account the effect of viscosity and so on.

Richard Nakka's Experimental Rocketry Web Site

Jet Aircraft Propulsion Prof. Bhaskar Roy Prof. A M Pradeep Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

GALCIT Ludwieg Tube Ae 104b

DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPRESSED CARBON DIOXIDE PROPULSION UNIT FOR NEAR-TERM MARS SURFACE APPLICATIONS

Theoretical Gas Flow through Gaps in Screw-type Machines

Thin airfoil theory. Chapter Compressible potential flow The full potential equation

High Speed Aerodynamics. Copyright 2009 Narayanan Komerath

ADVANCES in NATURAL and APPLIED SCIENCES

STEP Support Programme. Mechanics STEP Questions

Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Mach 2 and 4 Pseudo-Shock Waves in a Square Duct

FUNDAMENTALS OF AERODYNAMICS

Transition between Regular Reflection and Mach Reflection in the Dual-Solution Domain

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SHOCK WAVE PATTERNS IN SUPERSONIC DIVERGENT SYMMETRIC NOZZLES

Measurements using Bernoulli s equation

2013/5/22. ( + ) ( ) = = momentum outflow rate. ( x) FPressure. 9.3 Nozzles. δ q= heat added into the fluid per unit mass

Jet Aircraft Propulsion Prof. Bhaskar Roy Prof A M Pradeep Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Oblique Shock Visualization and Analysis using a Supersonic Wind Tunnel

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

Lecture with Numerical Examples of Ramjet, Pulsejet and Scramjet

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF HIGH-SPEED SEPARATION FLOW IN THE AEROSPACE PROPULSION SYSTEMS

SUPERSONIC WIND TUNNEL Project One. Charles R. O Neill School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 74078

+ d = d o. "x ) + (d! v2 ) "v. "y = 0. (4.4.2)

ACTIVE CONTROL OF BASE PRESSURE IN SUDDENLY EXPANDED FLOW FOR AREA RATIO 4.84

Design and Optimization of De Lavel Nozzle to Prevent Shock Induced Flow Separation

Numerical investigation on the effect of inlet conditions on the oblique shock system in a high-speed wind tunnel

Flow Field Analysis of Jet Impinging on an Inclined Flat Plate at High Plate Angles

Notes #4a MAE 533, Fluid Mechanics

CFD Simulation of Internal Flowfield of Dual-mode Scramjet

One-Dimensional Isentropic Flow

INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING (Autonomous) Dundigal, Hyderabad

13.Prandtl-Meyer Expansion Flow


Hypersonic flow and flight

Solutions to Merav Opher (2010) Problems

Visualization of high-speed gas jets and their airblast sprays of cross-injected liquid

Lecture # 12: Shock Waves and De Laval Nozzle

HVAC Clinic. Duct Design

A STUDY ON THE BEHAVIOR OF SHOCK WAVE AND VORTEX RING DISCHARGED FROM A PIPE

Supersonic Flow Turning

Introduction to Aerospace Engineering

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Progress in Aerospace Sciences

I. Introduction. external compression. supersonic flow. II. Design Criteria

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF STATIC INTERNAL PERFORMANCE FOR AN AXISYMMETRIC VECTORING EXHAUST NOZZLE

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI

Introduction to Aerodynamics. Dr. Guven Aerospace Engineer (P.hD)

SPC 407 Sheet 6 - Solution Compressible Flow Fanno Flow

Chapter 17. For the most part, we have limited our consideration so COMPRESSIBLE FLOW. Objectives

Fanno Flow. Gas Dynamics

Compressible Flow. Professor Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer Spacecraft Propulsion Specialist

Isentropic Duct Flows

Gasdynamics 1-D compressible, inviscid, stationary, adiabatic flows

International Conference on Methods of Aerophysical Research, ICMAR 2008

THEORETICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS ON CHOKING PHENOMENA OF AXISYMMETRIC CONVERGENT NOZZLE FLOW

Analytical reconsideration of the von Neumann paradox in the reflection of a shock wave over a wedge

Chapter 4 Force and Motion

REFLECTION AND REFRACTION

Application of Analytical and Numerical Methods for the Design of Transonic Axial Compressor Stages

Wednesday 9/27. Please open quizizz

Transcription:

Aerothermodynamics of High Speed Flows Lecture 5: Nozzle design G. Dimitriadis 1

Introduction Before talking about nozzle design we need to address a very important issue: Shock reflection We have already stated that shocks can exist in nozzles. As nozzles are closed spaces, the shocks will extend to the walls. What happens when a shock reaches a wall? The same question applies to expansion waves. 2

Shock reflection Consider an oblique shock with angle b 1 reaching a wall. The flow boundary condition is impermeability: flow cannot cross the wall. Shock wave 1 q M 2 M 1 b 1 b 2 -q M 3 F Shock wave 2 3

Discussion The flow is deflected by an angle q behind the shock wave. If the shock wave disappears at the wall, the flow will cross the solid boundary. Therefore the shock cannot disappear, it must be reflected. The reflected shock must deflect the flow by an angle -q so that the flow remains parallel to the wall. Note that M 2 <M 1. Therefore, the reflected shock is weaker than the original. 4

Example The Mach number upstream of the oblique shock is M 1 =2.8 and the angle b 1 is 35 o. Calculate the angle of the reflected shock wave to the wall F. Also calculate the Mach number behind the reflected shock M 3. 5

Solution From the oblique shock tables, for M 1 =2.8, b 1 =35 o : The flow deflection angle is q=16 o. The Mach number behind the shock is M 2 =2.06. The reflected shock must deflect the flow by q=16 o and the upstream Mach number is 2.06. From the oblique shock tables: The shock angle is b 2 =45.56 o. The downstream Mach number is M 3 =1.45. The angle F is F=b 2 -q=29.56 o. Note that the original shock wave s angle to the wall was 35 o while that of the reflected wave is lower at 29.56 o. Shock waves are not deflected at the same angle! 6

Counter-example The original shock wave has an angle b 1 =42 o. The upstream Mach number is still M 1 =2.8. The deflection angle is q=22 o. The downstream Mach number is M 2 =1.75. The reflected Mach number must deflect the flow by q=22 o. There is no such shock wave for a Mach number of 1.75. The maximum deflection angle is 18.09 o. What happens now? 7

Mach reflection The oblique shock cannot reach the wall! A normal shock forms at the wall propagating downwards and curving to merge with the oblique shock. At the intersection a third curved reflected shock is formed. Normal shock M 2 q Curved reflected shock Shock wave 1 M 1 8

Left and right running In the previous examples, the initial shock is leftrunning: An observer standing on the wave and looking downstream sees the wave running off toward the left. The reflected shock is right-running: An observer standing on the wave and looking downstream sees the wave running off toward the right. Left-running wave Right-running wave 9

Shock intersection Consider the intersection between a leftrunning and a right-running wave: The two shocks meet at point 2. There they are refracted into two new waves with different angles. 1 B C 3 q 3 D q 5 q 4 5 4 F The line CF is a slip line: Flow cannot cross it. In other words, flow in regions 4 and 5 must be parallel. A 2 q 2 E 10

Discussion The flow must be parallel in regions 4 and 5 because: If the two flow directions converge, they will cross the slip line. Impossible If the the two flow directions diverge, they will leave a vacuum behind them. Impossible. In other words, q 3 -q 5 =q 2 -q 4. Furthermore, the pressure in regions 4 and 5 must be equal. If it was not, the slip line would move until the two pressures became equal. In other words, p 4 =p 5. 11

Example Consider the diffuser of a supersonic wind tunnel running at M=3. The diffuser is straight and symmetric with an angle q=14 o. How many reflections can there be? What will be the Mach number at the end of the reflections? What is the drop in total pressure? 12

Solution Due to symmetry, the slip line CF must be horizontal. It follows that q 2 =q 3 =q 4 =q 5 =q. B For calculating the static pressure drop across the oblique shocks, recall that upstream of an oblique shock: M n1 = M 1 sin β 1 A C 3 2 q 3 q 2 D E q 5 q 4 5 4 F 13

Solution (2) Calculate all the possible shock waves: M 1 = 3,θ =14 0 β 2,3 = 31.24 0, M 2,3 = 2.30, M n1 =1.56, p 0 2,3 p 01 = 0.91 M 2,3 = 2.30,θ =14 0 β 4,5 = 38.53 0, M 4,5 =1.75, M n2,3 =1.43, p 0 4,5 p 02,3 = 0.95 M 4,5 =1.75,θ =14 0 β 6,7 = 51.59 0, M 6,7 =1.23, M n4,5 =1.37, p 0 6,7 p 04,5 = 0.97 M 6,7 =1.23,θ =14 0 β 8,9 = NAN One refraction and one reflection are possible. At the second refraction, the Mach number does not allow a 14 o flow deflection. 14

Solution (3) At the end of the calculation, the Mach number is 1.23. The diffuser total pressure ratio is 0.84 from entrance to exit. A Mach 3 normal shock corresponds to a total pressure ratio of 0.33. The diffuser has not decelerated the flow to subsonic conditions but has brought it close to sonic with much higher efficiency than a normal shock. y 1 0.5 0-0.5-1 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 x 15

Practical diffusers In practical diffusers the last shock is a very weak Mach reflection. The normal shock associated with the Mach reflection leads to subsonic flow. The diffuser has two section: One highly inclined section where the necessary flow deflections are high. One flatter section where the flow deflections are much lower. The sonic throat lies at the end of the flat section. From J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow 16

Example revisited Consider the previous diffuser example. What would happen if the diffuser angle was reduced to 2 after the first reflection? First reflection etc M 1 = 3,θ =14 0 β 2,3 = 31.24 0, M 2,3 = 2.30 M 2,3 = 2.30,θ =14 0 β 4,5 = 38.53 0, M 4,5 =1.75 M 4,5 =1.75,θ = 2 0 β 6,7 = 36.69 0, M 6,7 =1.68 M 6,7 =1.68,θ = 2 0 β 8,9 = 39.27 0, M 8,9 =1.58 M 8,9 =1.58,θ = 2 0 β 10,11 = 40.73 0, M 10,11 =1.53 M 10,11 =1.53,θ = 2 0 β 12,13 = 42.32 0, M 12,13 =1.48 M 12,13 =1.48,θ = 2 0 β 14,15 = 44.07 0, M 12,13 =1.43 17

Expansion wave reflection Expansion waves are also reflected: Incident wave Reflected wave They are curved in the region where the incident and reflected waves intersect: Non-simple region. 18

Characteristic lines Two characteristic lines pass from every point in a supersonic flow, a left running (S + ) and a right running (S - ) characteristic. Characteristic lines are Mach lines: The S + characteristic has an angle q+µ, where µ is the local Mach angle. The S - characteristic has an angle q-µ. Characteristics are normally curved. The slope of the characteristic is known at a point where all the flow parameters are known. All points on a characteristic line have the same value of s +,-. The quantity s - =q+n(m) is constant on a left running characteristic. The quantity s + =q-n(m) is constant on a right running characteristic. n(m) is the Prandtl-Meyer function and q is the local flow angle. In the diagram on the right, points 1 and 2 lie on the same S + and points 2 and 3 lie on the same S - characteristic: q 1 -n(m 1 )=q 2 -n(m 2 ) q 2 +n(m 2 )=q 3 +n(m 3 ) 1 2 3 19

Equations The important equations to remember are: Prandtl-Meyer function: ν ( M ) = γ +1 γ 1 tan 1 γ 1 γ +1 M 2 1 ( ) tan 1 M 2 1, with ν 1 ( ) = 0 Mach angle: µ = sin 1 1 M Characteristics: θ +ν ( M ) = s or θ ν M ( ) = s + Slope of characteristics: λ ± = tan( θ ± µ ) θ = 1 ( 2 s + s + ) ν ( M ) = 1 ( 2 s s + ) 20

Linearized characteristics Curved characteristics cannot be easily handled. We don t know the shape of the curve unless we solve numerical the flow equation. It is possible to simplify the analysis by assuming that characteristic lines are straight line segments. This is a very powerful procedure: If we know the flow parameters at two points in the flow, we can calculate the equations of the characteristics that pass through them. We can then calculate the intersection of the S + characteristic from the first point with the S - characteristic from the second. This intersection defines a third point in the flow, at which we can calculate all the flow parameters. We can also calculate the intersection of the S - characteristic from the first point with the S + characteristic from the second. We have now calculated a fourth point in the flow. 21

Linearized characteristics The coordinates, flow angle and Mach number are known at points 1 and 2. (2) (S + ) 1 x 1,2, y 1,2,θ 1,2, M 1,2 We can calculate the equations of the characteristic lines, i.e. 1 (S - ) 1 ( S + ) : y = tan θ 1,2 1,2 + µ 1,2 ( S ) : y = tan θ 1,2 1,2 µ 1,2 ( )( x x 1,2 ) + y 1,2 ( )( x x 1,2 ) + y 1,2 The coordinates of point 3 are the intersection of lines (S + ) 2 and (S - ) 1. The coordinates of point 4 are the intersection of lines (S + ) 1 and (S - ) 2. 4 2 3 (S - ) 2 (S + ) 2 22

Linearized characteristics (3) As an example, the coordinates of point 3 are given by: ( ) x 1 y 2 + tan( θ 2 + µ 2 ) x 2 x 3 = y 1 tan θ 1 µ 1 tan θ 2 + µ 2 ( ) tan( θ 1 µ 1 ) At point 3: y 3 = tan( θ 2 + µ 2 )( x 3 x 2 ) + y 2 θ 3 +ν M 3 θ 3 ν M 3 ( ) = ( s ) 1 =θ 1 +ν ( M 1 ) ( ) = ( s + ) 2 =θ 2 ν ( M 2 ) These are two equations with two unknowns, q 3 and M 3 :! " = 1 2 & ' ( + & * +, - " = 1 2 & ' ( & * + (1) We have now fully characterized point 3. 23

Expansion wave reflection The reflection of a single expansion wave can be analyzed using the method of characteristics. Left running characteristic S + Right running characteristic S - Incident wave Reflected wave 24

Nozzle design Quasi-1D flow can give us a lot of information on flow conditions inside a nozzle. However, it cannot be used to design the shape of the nozzle. The flow is in reality 2D and must be treated accordingly. If the shape of the nozzle is not appropriate, shocks can occur inside it. We can use the method of characteristics to design the shape of a nozzle. 25

Nozzle geometry Nozzles can contain two sections: An expansion section A straightening section From J. D. Anderson, Modern Compreesible Flow 26

Minimum length nozzles Nozzles with an expansion section create better quality flow but are long. They are preferred for wind tunnels. Minimum length nozzles have no expansion section. They are preferred for rocket engines. From J. D. Anderson, Modern Compreesible Flow 27

Symmetry As with diffusers, we can analyze only half of the nozzle if it is symmetric. Note that the maximum wall angle, q w,max,occurs at the throat. y 4 3 2 1 0 c a b -1-2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 x 28

Mach number and maximum angle At point c the Mach number is the design Mach number, M e, and the flow direction is q=0 o. At point b the flow direction is q=0 o because the point lies on the centerline. Points b and c lie on the same left running characteristic, i.e.: θ c ν M c ( ) =θ b ν ( M b ) ν ( M b ) = ν ( M e ) Points a and b lie on the same right running characteristic, i.e: θ w,max ν ( M a ) =θ b ν ( M b ) θ w,max ν ( M a ) = ν ( M e ) 29

Point a Consider point a: It is a Prandtl-Meyer expansion. q throat =0 M throat =1 (s + ) a a (s - ) a q a =q w,max M a =? On the s + characteristics passing through a: θ throat ν ( M throat ) =θ a ν ( M a ) Substituting: θ a = ν ( M a ) or ν ( M a ) =θ w,max We can find the Mach number behind the expansion. Note also that ( s ) a =θ a +ν ( M a ) = 2θ w,max, ( s + ) a =θ a ν ( M a ) = 0 30

Maximum nozzle angle Consider the right running characteristics passing through points a and b ( s ) a = 2θ w,max ( s ) b = ν ( M e ) But the two points lie on the same right running characteristics, so that (s - ) a =(s - ) b. Therefore: θ w,max = ν M e ( ) 2 Which means that the maximum nozzle angle is uniquely defined by the design exit Mach number. Note that this is only the case for minimum length nozzles. 31

Point 1 Now consider point 1, a point on the centerline and close to the throat. a q w,max As the point lies on the centerline, the flow deflection must be zero. However, we cannot start the scheme if we set the flow deflection to zero. Instead, we choose a small flow deflection Dq. Then, And, hence q a =0 M a =1 1 q 1 =Dq M 1 =? θ a ν ( M a ) =θ 1 ν ( M 1 ) or ν ( M 1 ) = Δθ ( s ) 1 =θ 1 +ν ( M 1 ) = 2Δθ, ( s + ) 1 =θ 1 ν ( M 1 ) = 0 32

Expansion fan Now we can draw the entire expansion fan as n lines. The flow deflections caused by the expansion linear are equally spaced from Dq to q w,max. As they are all characteristic lines passing by point a, they will be characterized by: ( s ) j = 2θ j, ( s + ) j =θ j ν M j As they are all right-running, the slope of each line is given by: λ j ( ) = tan θ j sin 1 1 $ = tan θ j µ j " $ # ( ) = 0 (2) M j % ' & 33

Expansion fan (2) The current form of the expansion fan is straight lines. However, we know that each characteristic line will be reflected from the centerline. Reflected characteristics will interact with the incident characteristics. This phenomenon has not been computed yet. y 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5 1 9 16 22 27 31 34 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 x 34

Point 1 (again) Two characteristics pass by point 1: The right running with slope! "# = tan ( ) + ) The left running with slope!,# = tan ( ) + + ) As point 1 lies on the centerline, the two characteristics describe fully the reflection of the expansion wave: The right running characteristic is the incident wave The left running characteristic is the reflected wave. Recall that we decided that q 1 =Dq. Therefore the two waves are not reflected at the same angle. 35

First reflection Point 2 is the intersection of the left running characteristic from point 1 with the right running characteristic (s - ) 9. Point 3 is the intersection of the left running characteristic from point 2 with the right running characteristic (s - ) 16. Point 4 is the intersection of the left running characteristic from point 3 with the right running characteristic (s - ) 22. Etc. y 1.5 1 0.5 0-0.5 2 34567 1 9 16 22 27 31 34 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 x 36

Flow deflections Points 1-7 lie on the same left-running characteristic with (s + ) 1 =0 (see equation 2). At point 2 the right-running characteristic is (s - ) 9 =2Dq (equation 2 again). Then, from equation 1:! " = 1 2 & ' ( + & * + = Δ! -. / = 1 2 & ' ( & * + = Δ! From equation 2, at point 7, (s - ) 34 =2q w,max i.e.! 1 = 1 2 & ' /2 + & * + =! 3,567 -. 1 = 1 2 & ' /2 & * + =! 3,567 which means that after the last intersection the flow is already parallel to the wall. 37

Intersection with the The point where the reflected characteristic reaches the wall is the intersection between the left running characteristic from point 7 and the wall. The wall is modeled as a straight line with slope tanq w,max starting at point a. Point 8 lies at the intersection between a line with slope tanq w,max starting at point a and the left-running characteristic coming from point 7. The flow direction and Mach number at point 8 are identical to those at point 7. y wall 1.5 8 1 0.5 34567 2 0 1 9 16 22 27 31 34-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 x 38

Point 9 Point 9 has not been properly calculated yet. It lies on the same right running characteristic as point 2. Therefore (s - ) 9 =(s - ) 2. As point 9 lies on the centerline, q=0. This means that: ( s ) 9 =θ 9 +ν ( M 9 ) ν ( M 9 ) = ( s ) 2 Its left running characteristic is given by ( s + ) 9 =θ 9 ν M 9 ( ) ( s + ) 9 = ν ( M 9 ) 39

Pinpointing points 9-15 Point 9 is the intersection of the right running characteristic from point 2 and the centerline. We can generalize by saying that any point lying on the centerline is the intersection between the right running characteristic from the second point on the previous reflection and the centerline. Point 10 is the intersection between the right running characteristic from point 3 and the left running characteristic from point 9. And so on until we get to point 14. Point 15 lies on the wall. All its values (Mach number, deflection angle, characteristics etc) are equal to those at point 14. Point 15 is the intersection of a line with slope tanq 14 starting at point 8 and the left-running characteristic from point 14. 40

Two reflections The result after the reflections of two expansion waves is: The wall should not deflect the flow; its slope is always given by the flow direction after the last refraction: Point 8 has slope tanq 7 Point 15 has sloped tanq 14 Etc. y 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1 6 7 3 45 2 9 8 14 13 12 11 10 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 x 15 41

Complete nozzle After n reflections we had the complete design. The Mach number at points 34 and 35 is the desired Mach number. The flow direction at points 34 and 35 is q 34 =q 35 =0. y 4 3 2 1 0-1 1 2 345 67 8 13 14 15 9 101112 16 17181920 22 232425 27 2829 31 32 34 21 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 x 26 30 33 35 42

Discussion The method is approximate: Characteristic lines are not truly straight. They are approximated as straight. Even the sonic line is curved in reality. Better approximations can be obtained using finite differences. y 4 3 2 1 0-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 x 43