The above dispersion relation results when a plane wave Ψ ( r,t

Similar documents
Applied Nuclear Physics (Fall 2006) Lecture 2 (9/11/06) Schrödinger Wave Equation

Superposition of electromagnetic waves

The Wave Function. Chapter The Harmonic Wave Function

LECTURE 4 WAVE PACKETS

Lecture 4. 1 de Broglie wavelength and Galilean transformations 1. 2 Phase and Group Velocities 4. 3 Choosing the wavefunction for a free particle 6

Wave Phenomena Physics 15c. Lecture 11 Dispersion

Lecture 4 - Dirac Spinors

The Wave Function. Chapter The Harmonic Wave Function

= k, (2) p = h λ. x o = f1/2 o a. +vt (4)

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 43 Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and the Klein-Gordon Equation

CHM 532 Notes on Wavefunctions and the Schrödinger Equation

Quantum Physics Lecture 3

Physics 351 Wednesday, April 22, 2015

arxiv:physics/ v3 [physics.gen-ph] 2 Jan 2006

If electrons moved in simple orbits, p and x could be determined, but this violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

Physics 452 Lecture 33: A Particle in an E&M Field

Physics 576 Stellar Astrophysics Prof. James Buckley. Lecture 13 Thermodynamics of QM particles

Bound and Scattering Solutions for a Delta Potential

Lecture 35 (de Broglie & Matter Waves) Physics Fall 2018 Douglas Fields

Electric and Magnetic Forces in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Formalism

dt r r r V(x,t) = F(x,t)dx

arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 22 Dec 2004

Wave Packets. Eef van Beveren Centro de Física Teórica Departamento de Física da Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade de Coimbra (Portugal)

Preliminaries: what you need to know

Chapter 38 Quantum Mechanics

Chapter 3 Time dilation from the classical wave equation. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

PHYS 3313 Section 001 Lecture #16

Attempts at relativistic QM

Wave Properties of Particles Louis debroglie:

David J. Starling Penn State Hazleton PHYS 214

Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics as a Gauge Theory

ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline:

Rapid Review of Early Quantum Mechanics

Why quantum field theory?

Classical-quantum Correspondence and Wave Packet Solutions of the Dirac Equation in a Curved Spacetime

Physics 351 Monday, April 23, 2018

Lecture 6. Four postulates of quantum mechanics. The eigenvalue equation. Momentum and energy operators. Dirac delta function. Expectation values

Physics 351 Friday, April 24, 2015

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Physics 486 Discussion 5 Piecewise Potentials

Quantum Physics Lecture 6

2018 Quantum Physics

Modern Physics Laboratory Beta Spectroscopy Experiment

Quantum Field Theory

Classical field theory 2012 (NS-364B) Feynman propagator

G : Quantum Mechanics II

STRUCTURE OF MATTER, VIBRATIONS AND WAVES, AND QUANTUM PHYSICS

EQUIPMENT Beta spectrometer, vacuum pump, Cs-137 source, Geiger-Muller (G-M) tube, scalar

Quantum Chemistry I : CHEM 565

4. Supplementary Notes on Time and Space Evolution of a Neutrino Beam

1 Schrödinger s Equation

Electrodynamics HW Problems 06 EM Waves

1 Basics of Quantum Mechanics

arxiv:quant-ph/ v3 7 May 2003

The Klein Gordon Equation

Lecture 20: Quantum mechanics

The Klein-Gordon equation

Physics 11b Lecture #24. Quantum Mechanics

Quantum Field Theory II

4. The Standard Model

Pilot Waves and the wave function

Wave Phenomena Physics 15c. Masahiro Morii

Chemistry 3502/4502. Exam I. February 6, ) Circle the correct answer on multiple-choice problems.

Chapter 13. Local Symmetry

A Propagating Wave Packet The Group Velocity

The Schroedinger equation

More on waves + uncertainty principle

The Schrödinger Wave Equation Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

Chapter 38. Photons and Matter Waves

4E : The Quantum Universe. Lecture 9, April 13 Vivek Sharma

Wave Mechanics in One Dimension

Physics 106a, Caltech 13 November, Lecture 13: Action, Hamilton-Jacobi Theory. Action-Angle Variables

[variable] = units (or dimension) of variable.

Chapter 10 Operators of the scalar Klein Gordon field. from my book: Understanding Relativistic Quantum Field Theory.

Module 8: Sinusoidal Waves Lecture 8: Sinusoidal Waves

arxiv:quant-ph/ v2 21 Apr 2004

NEWTONIAN COSMOLOGY. Figure 2.1: All observers see galaxies expanding with the same Hubble law. v A = H 0 r A (2.1)

Electromagnetism. Christopher R Prior. ASTeC Intense Beams Group Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

Modern Physics. Unit 3: Operators, Tunneling and Wave Packets Lecture 3.3: The Momentum Operator

Lecture 7. 1 Wavepackets and Uncertainty 1. 2 Wavepacket Shape Changes 4. 3 Time evolution of a free wave packet 6. 1 Φ(k)e ikx dk. (1.

Wave Phenomena Physics 15c

Problem 1. Part a. Part b. Wayne Witzke ProblemSet #4 PHY ! iθ7 7! Complex numbers, circular, and hyperbolic functions. = r (cos θ + i sin θ)

Planck s Quantum Hypothesis Blackbody Radiation

Mechanics and Special Relativity (MAPH10030) Assignment 4

Chemistry 3502/4502. Exam I Key. September 19, ) This is a multiple choice exam. Circle the correct answer.

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)

PHYS 385 Lecture 1 - Introduction 1-1

Lecture 38: Equations of Rigid-Body Motion

Assignment 1 for GEOL 1820: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Waves and Mean Flows Edition Due Sept. 23, 2016

1 Planck-Einstein Relation E = hν

Physics-I. Dr. Anurag Srivastava. Web address: Visit me: Room-110, Block-E, IIITM Campus

Electron in a Box. A wave packet in a square well (an electron in a box) changing with time.

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department 8.323: Relativistic Quantum Field Theory I PROBLEM SET 2

Particle Physics Dr. Alexander Mitov Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation

The Calculus of Vec- tors

Chemistry 3502/4502. Exam I. February 6, ) Circle the correct answer on multiple-choice problems.

Lecture 4 - Relativistic wave equations. Relativistic wave equations must satisfy several general postulates. These are;

Path integrals and the classical approximation 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon 14 November 2011

Lecture 6. 1 Normalization and time evolution 1. 2 The Wavefunction as a Probability Amplitude 3. 3 The Probability Current 5

Transcription:

Lecture 31: Introduction to Klein-Gordon Equation Physics 452 Justin Peatross 31.1 Review of De Broglie - Schrödinger From the de Broglie relation, it is possible to derive the Schrödinger equation, at least in the case of a free particle (i.e. V = 0 ). From the de Broglie relation, we can find the corresponding dispersion relation as follows: p = h λ = k (de Broglie) (31.1) mv g = m dω dk = k dω = kdk (31.2) m ω = 2 2m k2 (dispersion relation) (31.3) In the above analysis, it is important to realize that the particle momentum is related to the group velocity v g dω dk, since a particle ought to travel at the speed of the wave packet associated with it. The above dispersion relation results when a plane wave Ψ ( r,t ) = Ae i ( k r ωt ) is plugged into the following differential equation: i Ψ = 2 2m 2 Ψ (Schrödinger equation for free particle) (31.4) We conclude that (31.4) is the wave equation with solutions consistent with de Broglie s hypothesis. We have the following correspondence between momentum/energy and the derivatives in (31.4): ω E i, k p i. (31.5) That is, these operators when applied to Ψ tell you something about energy and momentum. In this language, the dispersion relation (31.3) may be written as E = p2 2m. 31.2 Review of Continuity Equation - Schrödinger We next examine the time derivative of the following quantity 1

) Ψ ( x,t) 2. (Schrödinger probability density) (31.6) With appropriate normalization of Ψ, ρ is interpreted as a probability density. That is, the probability of finding the particle in a region of space is P = region of space )d 3 r. (31.7) Let us take the time derivative of this probability (to see how the probability of finding the particle in the region either increases or decreases with time): dt = ρ d 3 r = Ψ Ψ + Ψ Ψ d 3 r dt = 1 i 2 2m 2 Ψ Ψ + Ψ 1 Ψ i 2 2m 2 Ψ d 3 r = i 2m Ψ ( 2 Ψ ) ( 2 Ψ )Ψ d 3 r = i 2m Ψ Ψ ( ) Ψ ( )Ψ d 3 r In the above expression, we have substituted from (31.4) and (31.6). We next define J ( r,t ) i 2m Ψ Ψ ( ) Ψ ( )Ψ (31.8), (Schrödinger probability current) (31.9) where we call the probability current. We can appreciate why it is named the probability current by applying the divergence theorem to (31.8): dt = region of space Jd 3 r = J ˆn da (31.10) surface We see that the change in the probability of finding the quantum particle within a region of space is connected to the flow of J through the surface containing the region. (Note that ˆn is the surface normal.) Finally, can write (31.10) as ρ d 3 r = Jd 3 r J + ρ d 3 r = 0 (31.11) Since the region of integration is arbitrary, the only way for (31.10) to be true is for the integrand to be zero everywhere. Thus we have J + ρ = 0, (31.11) 2

which is called a continuity equation. 3. De Broglie Klein-Gordon The preceding sections follow a non-relativistic scenario. In particular, (31.2) assumes p = mv g, which comes from Newtonian mechanics. If we want a wave equation that obeys the principle of relativity, we must use p = mv g = k (31.13) 1 v 2 2 g c where we still use the de Broglie relation (31.1) to express the momentum in terms of wavelength. We will need to do some algebra to isolate v g. Starting from (31.13) we get m 2 v g 2 = 2 k 2 1 v g 2 ( c 2 ) m 2 + 2 k 2 c 2 ( )v g 2 v g = k m 2 + 2 k 2 c 2. (31.14) As before, we will use v g dω dk and integrate dω dk = k m 2 + 2 k 2 dω = c 2 c 2 ( 2 k c 2 )dk m 2 + 2 k 2 c 2 ω = c2 m 2 + 2 k 2 c 2 (31.15) We square this expression and arrive at 2 ω 2 = m 2 c 4 + c 2 2 k 2, (31.16) which is a dispersion relation. We get this relation when a plane wave Ψ ( r,t ) = Ae i ( k r ωt ) is plugged into the following equation: 2 2 Ψ 2 = m2 c 4 Ψ c 2 2 2 Ψ (Klein-Gordon equation for free particle) (31.17) We conclude that this is the wave equation governing particles, which is valid at relativistic speeds. This equation is harder to solve than the Schrödinger equation, since it is second order in time. We may view the Schrödinger equation as a low-energy limit to the Klein-Gordon equation. We see this by noting (31.15) may be approximated at low energy as ω = mc 2 1+ 2 k 2 m 2 c 2 mc 2 ( 1+ 2 k 2 2m 2 c 2 +...) mc 2 + 2 k 2 2m, which agrees with (31.3), 3

except of a constant offset mc 2. In context of the Schrödinger equation, this rest energy merely alters the arbitrary zero point reference for the particle energy. This simply ( )t appends e i mc2 to the wave function, which does not alter any observable. Using the same correspondences as before (31.5), the dispersion relation (31.15) may be written as It is common to write our plane wave solutions as E 2 = m 2 c 4 + c 2 p 2. (31.17) Ψ p r,t ( ) = A p e i ( p r Et), (31.18) where k p and ω E. The subscript p remind us that the wave is associated with a specific momentum. We may want to set the the normalizing factor A p to different values depending on the momentum. According to (31.17), the energy E is determined by the momentum through E ( p) = ± m 2 c 4 + c 2 p 2, where we will tend to favor the positive root rather than the negative root, the latter corresponding to antiparticles. 4. Continuity Equation Klein-Gordon We would like to develop expressions for probability density and probability current similar to (31.6) and (31.9), but this turns out to be a little tricky. If we try ρ( x,t) = Ψ ( x,t) 2 (i.e., if we start with dt = Ψ ( x,t) 2 d 3 Ψ r = Ψ + Ψ Ψ d 3 r as in (31.8)), then we will not be able to proceed, since the Klein-Gordon equation does not have a first-order derivative that would enable a substitution. So let s instead try working backwards from the current density (31.10) J ( r,t ) i 2m Ψ Ψ ( ) Ψ ( )Ψ to see if we can find a corresponding probability density ) that would satisfy the continuity equation. Using our previous definition of current density, we have Jd 3 r = i ( Ψ)Ψ Ψ ( Ψ ) 2m d 3 r = Substitution from the Klein-Gordon equation (31.17) gives i ( 2m 2 Ψ)Ψ Ψ ( 2 Ψ ) d 3 r (31.19) 4

Jd 3 r = i 2m Ψ 1 2 Ψ c 2 2 + m2 c 2 2 Ψ i = 2mc 2 Ψ 2 Ψ 2 2 Ψ 2 Ψ d 3 r = i 2mc 2 Apparently, the probability density is 1 2 Ψ c 2 2 + m2 c 2 2 Ψ Ψ Ψ Ψ Ψ d 3 r Ψ d 3 r (31.20) ) i 2mc 2 Ψ Ψ Ψ Ψ, (31.21) instead of the familiar Ψ 2. At least, this is what obeys the continuity equation (31.12) ρ + J = 0. As an example, the probability density for a free-particle plane wave Ψ ( r,t ) = Ae i ( k r ωt ) is ) i 2mc 2 k r ωt i Ae ( ) A e i k r ( ωt ) i k r ωt Ae ( ) A e i ( k r ωt ) = i 2mc 2 iω A 2 iω A 2 = ω A 2 mc 2 = E A 2 mc 2 (31.22) In the low-energy limit (i.e., the non-relativisitic limit), we have E mc 2, so this reduces the same answer as we would expect, namely A 2. 5