Problem set 6 for Quantum Field Theory course

Similar documents
Feynman Diagrams of the Standard Model Sedigheh Jowzaee

Quantization of the Photon Field QED

Dirac s Hole Theory and the Pauli Principle: Clearing up the Confusion

S = ( µ φ µ φ m 2 φ φ)d 4 x (1) Then we can easily read off the Lagrangian density to be: φ a φ a φ m 2 φ φ (3) π = L φ = φ (4) φ (5)

Quantum Field Theory Spring 2019 Problem sheet 3 (Part I)

Relativistic Waves and Quantum Fields

Solutions 4: Free Quantum Field Theory

Attempts at relativistic QM

Supporting Information for Relativistic effects in Photon-Induced Near Field Electron Microscopy

Week 5-6: Lectures The Charged Scalar Field

HIGGS&AT&LHC. Electroweak&symmetry&breaking&and&Higgs& Shahram&Rahatlou. Fisica&delle&Par,celle&Elementari,&Anno&Accademico&

PHY 396 K. Solutions for problem set #11. Problem 1: At the tree level, the σ ππ decay proceeds via the Feynman diagram

LSZ reduction for spin-1/2 particles

REVIEW REVIEW. A guess for a suitable initial state: Similarly, let s consider a final state: Summary of free theory:

3P1a Quantum Field Theory: Example Sheet 1 Michaelmas 2016

Lecture 6:Feynman diagrams and QED

Maxwell s equations. electric field charge density. current density

Feynman Rules of Non-Abelian Gauge Theory

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

Physics 218. Quantum Field Theory. Professor Dine. Green s Functions and S Matrices from the Operator (Hamiltonian) Viewpoint

The Klein-Gordon equation

Quantum Electrodynamics Test

NONRELATIVISTIC STRONG-FIELD APPROXIMATION (SFA)

LECTURE 3 BASIC QUANTUM THEORY

4. The Standard Model

Quantization of scalar fields

L = 1 2 µφ µ φ m2 2 φ2 λ 0

Quantization of Scalar Field

Mandl and Shaw reading assignments

Lecture notes for FYS610 Many particle Quantum Mechanics

PHYS 301 HOMEWORK #9-- SOLUTIONS

Non-relativistic scattering

Dirac Spinors. Kevin Cahill for 523 November 28, A 4-component spin-one-half Majorana of Dirac field ψ with action density

Quantum Field Theory Example Sheet 4 Michelmas Term 2011

Investigation of the 3 He-η system with polarized beams at ANKE

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory

Scattering amplitudes and the Feynman rules

Beginnings of the Helicity Basis in the (S, 0) (0, S) Representations of the Lorentz Group

Quantum Electrodynamics 1 D. E. Soper 2 University of Oregon Physics 666, Quantum Field Theory April 2001

PHY 396 K. Solutions for problems 1 and 2 of set #5.

we get our formula for the saddle-point integral (5.294) h(w) e xf(w). (5.301) xf 00 (w) (w j )

Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory

Quantum Field Theory Chapter 1, Homework & Solution

Lecture 8 Feynman diagramms. SS2011: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics, Part 2 2

An interesting result concerning the lower bound to the energy in the Heisenberg picture

1 Properties of Spherical Harmonics

Conventions for fields and scattering amplitudes

Introduction to Perturbative QCD

Time Frequency Aggregation Performance Optimization of Power Quality Disturbances Based on Generalized S Transform

Lecture 3: Propagators

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

1 The muon decay in the Fermi theory

HIGGS AT HADRON COLLIDER

Spin light of electron in matter

u = 1 (B 2 + E2 E B (16.2) + N = j E (16.3) One might be tempted to put u and N into a 4-vector N and write the equation in the form

Intercollegiate post-graduate course in High Energy Physics. Paper 1: The Standard Model

Two-photon effects in charge asymmetry in annihilation channel with χ 2 intermediate state

PHY 396 K. Problem set #7. Due October 25, 2012 (Thursday).

As usual, these notes are intended for use by class participants only, and are not for circulation. Week 6: Lectures 11, 12

Particle Physics. experimental insight. Paula Eerola Division of High Energy Physics 2005 Spring Semester Based on lectures by O. Smirnova spring 2002

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ

. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Wednesday March 30 ± ǁ

Quantization of a Scalar Field

3 Quantization of the Dirac equation

Textbook Problem 4.2: We begin by developing Feynman rules for the theory at hand. The Hamiltonian clearly decomposes into Ĥ = Ĥ0 + ˆV where

Currents and scattering

What s up with those Feynman diagrams? an Introduction to Quantum Field Theories

Beam-Beam Stability in Electron-Positron Storage Rings

Unitarity, Dispersion Relations, Cutkosky s Cutting Rules

Physics 221B Spring 2018 Notes 49 Electromagnetic Interactions With the Dirac Field

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 22 Apr 2017

Fundamental Interactions (Forces) of Nature

Quantization of the Dirac Field

2 Feynman rules, decay widths and cross sections

Kern- und Teilchenphysik I Lecture 2: Fermi s golden rule

1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator

Emittance Growth Caused by Surface Roughness

Physics 582, Problem Set 6 Solutions

For QFFF MSc Students Monday, 9th January 2017: 14:00 to 16:00. Marks shown on this paper are indicative of those the Examiners anticipate assigning.

6. QED. Particle and Nuclear Physics. Dr. Tina Potter. Dr. Tina Potter 6. QED 1

An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Peskin and Schroeder) Solutions

Physics 443 Homework 5 Solutions

d 3 k In the same non-relativistic normalization x k = exp(ikk),

ANALYSIS OF ULTRA LOW CYCLE FATIGUE PROBLEMS WITH THE BARCELONA PLASTIC DAMAGE MODEL

Decays, resonances and scattering

Uniformly best wavenumber approximations by spatial central difference operators: An initial investigation

2.4 Parity transformation

Maxwell s equations. based on S-54. electric field charge density. current density

Quantum Physics 2006/07

Particle Physics I Lecture Exam Question Sheet

PHY 396 K. Problem set #5. Due October 9, 2008.

Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics I

2.9 Dirac Notation Vectors ji that are orthonormal hk ji = k,j span a vector space and express the identity operator I of the space as (1.

7 Quantized Free Dirac Fields

Transcription:

Problem set 6 or Quantum Field Theory course 2018.03.13. Toics covered Scattering cross-section and decay rate Yukawa theory and Yukawa otential Scattering in external electromagnetic ield, Rutherord ormula QED e e, e e + and e + e + scattering and Coulomb interaction Recommended reading Peskin Schroeder: An introduction to quantum ield theory Sections 4.3-4.8 Problem 6.1 Decay rate and scattering cross section The ininitesimal scattering cross section o two incoming articles A and B with our-momenta A, B is exressed as ( 1 d 3 ) ( 1 M dσ = ( 2E A 2E B v A v B (2π) 3 A, B { }) 2 (2π) 4 δ (4) A + B ), (1) 2E where index runs over all inal states and M is the invariant transition amlitude. To obtain the inal result or the cross section it is necessary to erorm the hase sace integrals to eliminate the delta unctions. In the lecture, we derived the ollowing exression or a 2 2 scattering rocess in the centre-o-mass rame: ( ) dσ 1 1 = dω 2E A 2E B v A v B (2π) 2 M 2, (2) 4E C M C M where E C M = E 1 + E 2 is the total energy. (a) Equation (1) can be slightly modiied to describe the decay o an unstable article in its rest rame: ( dγ = 1 d 3 ) ( 1 M ( 2m A (2π) 3 A { }) 2 (2π) 4 δ (4) A ), (3) 2E where A = (m A,0,0,0) T. Following the derivation o the cross section, erorm the hase scae integrals to obtain a ormula or the case o a decay to two articles in the inal state: ( ) dγ dω C M 1 1 = Θ(M 2m) 2m A (2π) 2 M 2, (4) 4E C M where Θ(x) is the Heaviside ste unction and Ω is the solid angle or the direction o the inal article with momentum 1. Hint: Note that one o the integrals (say, over 2 ) is trivial due to the "satial" art o the Dirac delta and the remaining art (energy conservation) can be used to erorm the radial integral. The ollowing identity might be useul: d = E d E. 1

(b) The model discussed in Problem 5.4 exhibits such decays. Calculate the inverse lietime Γ o a heavy Φ article using the above equation (we recall that the result o Problem 5.4(d) is M = µ). Derive the ollowing result: µ 2 Γ = Θ(M 2m) 32Mπ which shows exlicitly that there is no decay or M < 2m. 1 4m2 M 2 (5) (c) Calculate the ull scattering cross-section σ o two light φ articles with momenta A,B into two light ones with momenta 1,2 in the same model using Eq. (2) and erorming the inal state hase sace integral. Use the result o Problem 5.4.(e): [ ] M = µ 2 1 ( A + B ) 2 M 2 + 1 ( A 1 ) 2 M 2 + 1 ( A 2 ) 2 M 2, (6) and erorm the comutation in COM rame. Show that the cross section decays as s 3 when s = ( A + B ) 2. Remark: by simle dimensional analysis high-energy cross-sections u to nth order o erturbation theory should decay as µ 2n s 1+nd, where d is energy dimension o couling µ. For d 0 the theory is called (suer)renormalizable. Problem 6.2 Wick s theorem and Yukawa theory The simliied version o Yukawa s theory consists o two ields: a real scalar Φ(x) and a Dirac ermion Ψ(x) with lane-wave exansions Φ(x) = Ψ(x) = d 3 k (2π) 3 1 2Ek [c k e i kx + c k ei kx], (7) d 3 k 1 (2π) 3 2Ek s=1,2 [ a sk u s (k)e i kx + b sk v s (k)e i kx]. (8) The Hamiltonian oerator governing the time-evolution is H = H D + H KG + d 3 xg ΨΨΦ, (9) where H D is describing a ree Dirac ield and H KG is the Klein Gordon Hamiltonian o the real scalar ield. We intend to treat the limit o small couling using Wick s theorem. (a) Calculate the normalization actor N o the interacting vacuum (c. Problem 5.4) u to second order in g. Recall that contraction between ermionic ields only involves airing o Ψ with Ψ and also that reordering leading to ermionic airings must use anticommutation relation o the ields. (b) Contraction with incoming scalar articles was exressed in Problem 5.4(c) Φ(x) q Φ = Φ(+) (x) q Φ = e i qx 0, (10) Do the same calculation involving incoming ermions and antiermions: Ψ ξ (x) q, s,n Ψ ξ (x) q, s,n = Ψ (+) ξ (x) q, s,n = u s ξ (q)e i qx 0, (11) = Ψ (+) ξ (x) q, s,n = v s ξ (q)e i qx 0, (12) where n and n reer to article secies and the s is a sin label. Similar relations or outgoing articles can be derived by taking the adjoint. Note that due to comlex conjugation an outgoing antiermion must be contracted with Ψ, not Ψ. 2

Figure 1: Feynman rules or Yukawa theory. Dashed lines denote scalar roagators, solid lines are ermionic. (c) Use these results to comute to lowest order the amlitude o the rocess where a ermion and its antiarticle annihilate into a boson ( Φ q T ex i g where sin indices are droed or brevity. d 4 xψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x)) 1,n; 2,n, (13) (d) Calculate the scattering amlitude o two ermions to leading order in the interaction,n;k,n ( T ex i g d 4 xψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x)),n;k,n. (14) As there are two ermions both in the initial and inal states, a convention must be seciied or the ordering o their creation and annihilation oerators. Let us ix,n;k,n a a k 0,,n;k,n 0 ak a. (15) Hint: watch out or signs coming rom exchanging ermionic ields! Problem 6.3 Feynman rules or Yukawa theory, Yukawa otential 1 (igure rom Pe- The Feynman rules or Yukawa theory in momentum sace are shown in Fig. skin&schroeder). (a) Draw the lowest order Feynman diagrams or the rocesses (13) and (14). Note that in the latter case there are two diagrams. What is their relative sign? (b) Now the amlitude or rocess (14) can be directly written in momentum sace. Derive the ormula or the invariant amlitude im. 3

(c) Let us consider the scattering o distinguishable non-relativistic ermions (in this case, only the irst o the two diagrams contribute). Non-relativistically we can write the our-momenta as = (m,). (16) Use this exression to evaluate ( ) 2 and u s () in Weyl reresentation u to leading order. Show by calculating the sinor roducts ū s ()u s ( ) that the sin is conserved or each article during the scattering in the nonrelativistic limit. (d) To sum u, write the non-relativistic scattering amlitude or distinguishable articles: i g 2 im = 2 + m 2 2mδ ss 2mδ r r. (17) Φ This is to be comared with the non-relativistic Born aroximation or scattering: i T = iṽ (q)2πδ(e E ), (18) where Ṽ (q) is the Fourier transorm o the scattering otential and q =. Read o Ṽ (q) or the Yukawa interaction. Note: actors o 2m come rom relativistic normalization and can be droed rom comarison with Born s ormula. (e) Obtain the exression o the Yukawa otential in real sace by erorming an inverse Fourier transorm. Hint: use a comlex contour when calculating the radial art o this integral. () You ind that two ermions eel an attractive otential due to their interaction. Without doing any lengthy calculations, just by looking at the signs argue that the situation is the same or an antiermion air and also or a ermion-antiermion scattering. Problem 6.4 Rutherord scattering Hint: There is a minus sign between ū s ()u s ( ) and v s ()v s ( ), and it is also necessary to disentangle all airings roerly. Consider the scattering o a Dirac ermion on an external classical electromagnetic ield described by a vector otential A µ (x). The interaction Hamiltonian is H I = e d 3 xψ(x)γ µ Ψ(x)A µ (x) (19) where e is the electric charge. (a) Use Wick s theorem to show that to leading order, the transition amlitude is given by the ollowing exression: i T = i eū s ( )γ µ u s ()à µ (q), (20) where q = and à is the our-dimensional Fourier transorm o A. (b) Assume that the external ield is static so energy is conserved by such a rocess. Then we have i T = im (2π)δ(E E i ). (21) For this rocess (1) is modiied as dσ = 1 d 3 1 M (i 2E i v i (2π) 3 ) 2 (2π)δ(E i E ). (22) 2E where v i is the velocity o the incoming article. Perorm the radial art o the hase sace integral in to obtain the dierential cross-section dσ dω = 1 16π 2 M 2 i =. (23) Hint: utilize the Dirac delta to imose a constraint on the relation between i and. 4

Figure 2: Feynman rules or interactions involving the hoton. The metric tensor is denoted by g µν. (c) Now secialize the classical ield to the Coulomb ield o a nucleus: with A i = 0. Perorm a Fourier transorm to obtain A 0 (q). A 0 = Z e 4πr. (24) Taking the nonrelativistic limit o sinors in the Weyl reresentation, derive the Rutherord ormula dσ dω = Z 2 α 2 4m 2 v 4 sin 4 (θ/2), (25) where θ is the scattering angle and α = e 2 /4π is the ine structure constant. Problem 6.5 Scattering in QED and Coulomb interaction In this exercise we consider scattering amlitudes o electrons and ositrons. To handle such rocesses, two additional Feynman rules are needed or the hoton that mediates the interaction (see Fig. 2.). (a) Draw the diagrams o e e e e scattering u to second order in e. What is the corresonding scattering amlitude? (b) Consider only one o the two ossible diagrams: the one without exchanging external lines. The amlitude or this rocess is im = ( i e) 2 ū( )γ µ u() iη µν ( ) 2 ū(k )γ ν u(k). (26) Take the nonrelativistic limit o sinors in the Weyl reresentation. What is ū( )γ µ u() in this limit? Hint: erorm the calculation at = = 0 and kee the term that does not vanish. (c) Read o Ṽ (q) or the electromagnetic interaction by comaring the non-relativistic limit o (26) to exression (18). Perorm an inverse Fourier transorm to derive the Coulomb otential in real sace. What is its sign? Hint: it is convenient to regularise the Fourier integral by adding a small ositive term to the denominator thus reducing the integral to that ound in the Yukawa case. (d) Draw second-order diagrams or the rocesses: e e + e e + and e + e + e + e +. Write down the amlitude which involves no annihilation/external leg exchange, resectively. Comare their sign with the nonrelativistic limit o (26) to show that attraction only aears or the electronositron air. 5