HST.583 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis Fall 2006

Similar documents
DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Advanced Topics and Diffusion MRI

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI): An overview of key concepts

Diffusion Imaging II. By: Osama Abdullah

Diffusion Tensor Imaging I: The basics. Jennifer Campbell

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Part 1: Theory & Methods

The effect of different number of diffusion gradients on SNR of diffusion tensor-derived measurement maps

Physics of MR Image Acquisition

Diffusion-Weighted MRI may be used to measure the apparent diffusion coefficient of water in tissue.

Diffusion imaging of the brain: technical considerations and practical applications

HST.583 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis Fall 2008

Lecture #7 In Vivo Water

Applications of Spin Echo and Gradient Echo: Diffusion and Susceptibility Contrast

Bayesian multi-tensor diffusion MRI and tractography

Basics of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and DtiStudio

On Signal to Noise Ratio Tradeoffs in fmri

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) e Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI)

Anisotropy of HARDI Diffusion Profiles Based on the L 2 -Norm

HST.583 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis Fall 2008

A Neurosurgeon s Perspectives of Diffusion Tensor Imaging(DTI) Diffusion Tensor MRI (DTI) Background and Relevant Physics.

Suppression of Static Magnetic Field in Diffusion Measurements of Heterogeneous Materials

Ordinary Least Squares and its applications

EE225E/BIOE265 Spring 2013 Principles of MRI. Assignment 9 Solutions. Due April 29th, 2013

Medical Visualization - Tensor Visualization. J.-Prof. Dr. Kai Lawonn

III, Diffusion, and Susceptibility. August 25, Departments of Mathematics and Applied Math and Computational Science University of Pennsylvania

Application of diffusion MRI to cancer, heart and brain connectome imaging

Effect of Bulk Tissue Motion on Quantitative Perfusion and Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging *

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI):

Cambridge University Press MRI from A to Z: A Definitive Guide for Medical Professionals Gary Liney Excerpt More information

PROBING THE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN PORES IN ROCK CORE SAMPLES

Diffusion Weighted MRI. Zanqi Liang & Hendrik Poernama

Two-step Anomalous Diffusion Tensor Imaging

MRI Physics II: Gradients, Imaging. Douglas C. Noll, Ph.D. Dept. of Biomedical Engineering University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

M R I Physics Course. Jerry Allison Ph.D., Chris Wright B.S., Tom Lavin B.S., Nathan Yanasak Ph.D. Department of Radiology Medical College of Georgia

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 December 10.

Quantitative Metrics for White Matter Integrity Based on Diffusion Tensor MRI Data. Stephanie Lee

Contrast Mechanisms in MRI. Michael Jay Schillaci

BNG/ECE 487 FINAL (W16)

醫用磁振學 MRM 擴散張量影像 擴散張量影像原理. 本週課程內容 MR Diffusion 擴散張量造影原理 擴散張量造影應用 盧家鋒助理教授國立陽明大學生物醫學影像暨放射科學系

DWI acquisition schemes and Diffusion Tensor estimation

Quantification of water compartmentation in cell suspensions by diffusion-weighted and T 2 -weighted MRI

Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy

Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Qun Zhao Bioimaging Research Center University of Georgia

Regularization of Diffusion Tensor Field Using Coupled Robust Anisotropic Diffusion Filters

An Analytical Model of Water Diffusion and Exchange in White Matter from Diffusion MRI and Its Application in Measuring Axon Radii

MRI in Review: Simple Steps to Cutting Edge Part I

Magnetic Resonance Characterization of Porous Media Using Diffusion through Internal Magnetic Fields

Diffusion MR Imaging Analysis (Prac6cal Aspects)

MR Spectroscopy: The Physical Basis and Acquisition Strategies

Sensitivity of Diffusion Weighted Steady State Free Precession to Anisotropic Diffusion

Generalizing Diffusion Tensor Model Using Probabilistic Inference in Markov Random Fields

Diffusion Tensor Imaging I. Jennifer Campbell

Robust estimator framework in diffusion tensor imaging

Field trip: Tuesday, Feb 5th

EL-GY 6813/BE-GY 6203 Medical Imaging, Fall 2016 Final Exam

Spatial encoding in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Jean-Marie BONNY

Diffusion Tensor Imaging tutorial

The measurement of diffusion and perfusion in biological systems using magnetic resonance imaging

Spatial encoding in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Jean-Marie BONNY

How does this work? How does this method differ from ordinary MRI?

Chemical Exchange. Spin-interactions External interactions Magnetic field Bo, RF field B1

Tensor Visualization. CSC 7443: Scientific Information Visualization

Anisotropic Interpolation of DT-MRI

A Riemannian Framework for Denoising Diffusion Tensor Images


Characterizing Non-Gaussian Diffusion by Using Generalized Diffusion Tensors

New developments in Magnetic Resonance Spectrocopy and Diffusion MRI. Els Fieremans Steven Delputte Mahir Ozdemir

Sequence Overview. Gradient Echo Spin Echo Magnetization Preparation Sampling and Trajectories Parallel Imaging. B.Hargreaves - RAD 229

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 May 19.

Introduction to MRI. Spin & Magnetic Moments. Relaxation (T1, T2) Spin Echoes. 2DFT Imaging. K-space & Spatial Resolution.

Diffusion MRI. Outline. Biology: The Neuron. Brain connectivity. Biology: Brain Organization. Brain connections and fibers

Numerical simulation and macroscopic model formulation for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in the brain

Lecture 8 Analyzing the diffusion weighted signal. Room CSB 272 this week! Please install AFNI

7.3.A. The expression for signal recovery is similar to that derived under exercise 7.2 and is given by:

Diffusion tensor imaging: brain pathway reconstruction

Master of Science Thesis. Using q-space Diffusion MRI for Structural Studies of a Biological Phantom at a 3T Clinical Scanner

BMB 601 MRI. Ari Borthakur, PhD. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology Associate Director, Center for Magnetic Resonance & Optical Imaging

NMR Advanced methodologies to investigate water diffusion in materials and biological systems

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Magn Reson. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 June 1.

Dynamic Contrast Enhance (DCE)-MRI

Magnetization Preparation Sequences

Introduction to MRI Acquisition

IMPROVED IMAGING OF BRAIN WHITE MATTER USING DIFFUSION WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING HA-KYU JEONG. Dissertation. Submitted to the Faculty of the

MOLECULAR, CELLULAR, & TISSUE BIOMECHANICS

H. Salehian, G. Cheng, J. Sun, B. C. Vemuri Department of CISE University of Florida

Rician Noise Removal in Diffusion Tensor MRI

The Measure of Diffusion Skewness and Kurtosis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Shape Anisotropy: Tensor Distance to Anisotropy Measure

Basic Pulse Sequences I Saturation & Inversion Recovery UCLA. Radiology

The physics of medical imaging US, CT, MRI. Prof. Peter Bogner

Improved Correspondence for DTI Population Studies via Unbiased Atlas Building

PROTEIN NMR SPECTROSCOPY

Research Article Thalamus Segmentation from Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Spin Dynamics Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Malcolm H. Levitt

Understanding brain micro-structure using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dmri)

Department of Radiology. University of Virginia. Wilson Miller SPIN October 7

Chapter 1 Pulsed Field Gradient NMR Sequences

Assessment of Tissue Micro-structure with Diusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Pulse Sequences: RARE and Simulations

7.36/7.91 recitation CB Lecture #4

Transcription:

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu HST.583 Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis Fall 2006 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

HST.583: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data Acquisition and Analysis, Fall 2006 Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology Course Director: Dr. Randy Gollub. Measuring Water Diffusion In Biological Systems Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Image removed due to copyright restrictions. "Diffusion-weighted axial image" http://www.medicineau.net.au/clinical/radiology/radiolog1768.html Karl Helmer HST 583, 2006

Why Would We Want to Measure the Self - Diffusion Coefficient of Water In Biological Tissue?

Why Would We Want to Measure the Self - Diffusion Coefficient of Water In Biological Tissue? We Don t.

Why Would We Want to Measure the Self - Diffusion Coefficient of Water In Biological Tissue? We Don t. What we are really interested in is how what we measure for a diffusion-weighted signal reflects the structure of the sample.

Why Would We Want to Measure the Self - Diffusion Coefficient of Water? We Don t. What we are really interested in is how what we measure for a diffusion-weighted signal reflects the structure of the sample. So, what are we measuring???

How Can the Diffusion Coefficient Reflect Sample Structure? Self-diffusion in bulk samples is a wellunderstood random process - Displacement (z) has a Gaussian probability distribution <z 2 > 1/2 = (2nDt) 1/2 probability(t) Courtesy of InductiveLoad. D = Self-Diffusion Coefficient n = # of dimensions z

How Can We Measure the Diffusion Coefficient of Water Using NMR?

How Can We Measure the Diffusion Coefficient of Water Using NMR? We Can t.

How Can We Measure the Diffusion Coefficient of Water Using NMR? We Can t. Instead we measure the displacement of the ensemble of spins in our sample and infer the diffusion coefficient.

How can we measures the (mean) displacement of water molecules using NMR? g(z) is a magnetic field added to B 0 that varies with position. ω(z) = γ (B 0 + g(z) z)

How can we measures the (mean) displacement of water molecules using NMR? z = 0 Tagging the initial position using phase of M z Applying g(z) for a time δ results in a phase shift that depends upon location in z

Now, after waiting a time we apply an equal gradient, but with the opposite sign Apply -g(z) for a time δ z if no diffusion: signal = M 0

But, in reality, there is always diffusion so we find that: Apply -g(z) for a time δ z if diffusion: signal = M 0 e (-q2 Dt) (t = - δ/3) q = q(g)

DW Spin Echo Pulse Sequences π/2 π δ Δ δ = gradient duration Δ = separation of gradient leading edges

But what do we do with: signal = M = M 0 e (-q2 Dt)? One equation, but two unknowns (M 0, D) How do we get another equation?

Change the diffusion-sensitizing gradient to a different value and acquire more data. q 2 t b = q 2 t = 0 ln(m) Slope = D Intercept = ln(m 0 ) b = q 2 t 0

Unrestricted Diffusion r' r

Restricted Diffusion r r'

The effect of barriers to the free diffusion of water molecules is to modify their probability distribution. P(z) Diffusion coefficient decreases with increasing diffusion time

Determination of D? Slope = D t dif ln(m/m0) 0-1 -2-3 -4 bead pack water -5-6 bulk water Slope = D 0 t dif -7 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 q 2 x 10 7 [1/cm 2 ] a = 15.8 μm bead pack, t dif = 50 ms, δ = 1.5 ms, g(max) = 72.8 G/cm See Helmer, et al. NMR in Biomedicine 8 (1995): 297-306.

Water Diffusion in an Ordered System High q 0-1 ln(m/m0) -2-3 -4-5 2π/a -6-7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 q 2 k 2 x 10 7 [1/cm 2 ] a = 15.8 μm bead pack, t dif = 100 ms

Short diffusion times: Long diffusion times:

D (t dif ) gives information on different length scales 160 S/V T = tortuosity S/V = surface-to-volume ratio D (t) D(t) x 10-7 [cm 2 /sec] ] 120 80 40 0 1/T t 1/2 [sec 1/2 ] 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 a = 15.8 μm bead pack t

DW-Weighted Tumor Data ln M(q,t)/M(0,t) 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5 0 50 100 q 2 [x10-9 m -2 ] 150 t dif = 42 ms 92 ms 192 ms 292 ms 492 ms D(t) Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)

ADC(t) for water in a RIF-1 Mouse Tumor D(t) 10 5 [cm 2 /s] Necrosis!! 0.10 0.24 0.60 0.75 0.10 2.55 (t) 1/2 [s 1/2 ]

ADC for water in a RIF-1 Mouse Tumor Control Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 > 255 x10-7 ADC cm 2 /sec 1 x 10-7 Tumor Volume 0.68 cm 3 0.97 cm 3 1.26 cm 3 1.42 cm 3 Day 5 Day 6 Histology ADC Tumor Volume 1.70 cm 3 2.04 cm 3

ADC for water in a RIF-1 Mouse Tumor Treatment, 100mg/kg 5-FU Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 ADC Tumor Volume 0.60 cm 3 0.70 cm 3 0.95 cm 3 0.86 cm 3 0.71 cm 3 0.76 cm 3 > 255 x10-7 cm 2 /sec 1 x 10-7 ADC Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 10 Day 11 Histology > 255 x10-7 cm 2 /sec 1 x 10-7 Tumor Volume 1.13 cm 3 1.36 cm 3 1.60 cm 3 1.79 cm 3 2.08 cm 3

ADC av Maps vs Post-Occlusion Time Rat Brain 30 min Occlusion See Fuhai Li, M. D., K. Helmer, et al. "Secondary Decline in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Neurological Outcomes after a Short Period of Focal Brain Ischemia in Rats." Ann Neurol 48, no. 2 (2000): 236. MCAO 2 hr 3 hr 4 hr 5 hr 6 hr 7 hr 8 hr 9 hr 10 hr 11 hr 12 hr ADC (x10-5 mm 2 /s) ROI Positions < 30 > 60

80 ADC av Maps vs Post-Occlusion Time Rat Brain 30 min Occlusion Temporal ADC Changes in the Caudoputamen: 30-minute Transient Occlusion (n = 4) 75 70 ADC (x10-5 mm 2 /s) 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 Rep 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Time (hours post reperfusion) Ipsilateral Contralateral See Fuhai Li, M. D., and K. Helmer, et al. "Secondary Decline in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Neurological Outcomes after a Short Period of Focal Brain Ischemia in Rats." Ann Neurol 48, no. 2 (2000): 236.

Issues with Interpreting DW Data In biological tissue, there are always restrictions. How then can we interpret the diffusion attenuation curve?

Biology-based Model: Intracellular and extracellular compartments D Biexponential Model with a distribution of cell sizes and shapes. Fast Exchange = f 1 D 1 + (1 f 1 ) D 2 S = S 0 ( f 1 e bd 1 + (1 f 1 ) e bd 2 ) Slow Exchange But real systems are rarely either/or.

DW-Weighted Tumor Data ln M(q,t)/M(0,t) 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5 0 50 100 q 2 [x10-9 m -2 ] 150 t dif = 42 ms 92 ms 192 ms 292 ms 492 ms What does non-monexponentiality tell us?

Fast and Slow Diffusion? 0 Slope = D fast t dif ln(m/m0) -1-2 -3-4 -5-6 bulk water Slope = D slow t dif -7 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 q 2 x 10 7 [1/cm 2 ] See Helmer, et al. NMR in Biomedicine 8 (1995): 297-306.

Does Fast and Slow Mean Extracellular and Intracellular? No, because: 1)The same shape of curve can be found in the diffusion attenuation curve of single compartment systems (e.g., beads). 2) It gives almost exactly the opposite values for extra- and intracellular volume fractions (20/80 instead of 80/20 for IC/EC). Exchange?

What does fast and slow measure? Answer: It depends on range of b-values TE t dif sample structure sample tortuosity Fig 1 in Clark, C. A., et al. "In Vivo Mapping of the Fast and Slow Diffusion Tensors in Human Brain." Magn Reson Med 47, no. 4 (April 2002): 623-8. doi:10.1002/mrm.10118. Copyright (c) 2002 Wiley-Liss Inc. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons., Inc.

D ave (fast) D ave (slow) FA(fast) FA(slow) Fig 1 in Clark, C. A., et al. "In Vivo Mapping of the Fast and Slow Diffusion Tensors in Human Brain." Magn Reson Med 47, no. 4 (April 2002): 623-8. doi:10.1002/mrm.10118. Copyright (c) 2002 Wiley-Liss Inc. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons., Inc. slow restricted

Do We Get More Information by Using the Entire Diffusion Attenuation Curve? 0.0-0.5 ln M(q,t)/M(0,t) -1.0-1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5 0 50 100 q 2 [x10-9 m -2 ] 150

Practical Issues in DWI How do I choose my lowest b-value? 1)Diffusion gradients act like primer-crusher pairs. Therefore, slice profile of g = 0 image will be different from g 0 image. 2) Diffusion gradients also suppress flowing spins. Therefore, the use of a g = 0 image is discouraged.

Practical Issues in DWI How do I choose my highest b-value? 1. Greatest SNR in calculated ADC: bi D Ii = I0e I = true signal S i = σ = I i ε + ε 2 1/ 2 S = measured signal ε = noise

Practical Issues in DWI D = ln S ln b S 1 0, b = q 2 t σ 1 σ 2 2 2 2 D ( ) (1 2 bd D σ 2 0 + σ1 = + e 2 2 b b I0 ) SNR D = D σ D = (1 + bd e 0 2bD 1/ 2 I ) I σ F( bd) SNR 0

Practical Issues in DWI How do I choose my highest b-value? 2. Greatest sensitivity to %ΔADC: I D max bd =1.0

Practical Issues in DWI How to distribute the b-values? q 2 t This or? ln(m)

Practical Issues in DWI How to distribute the b-values? q 2 t This or? ln(m)

Practical Issues in DWI How to distribute the b-values? q 2 t This? ln(m)

Multiple measurements of 2 b-values are better than multiple different b-values. If the number of measurements can be large, then N high-b = N low-b 3.6 Note that depending on N and how you estimate the error, you can get different numbers for the optimum values, but Δb opt ~ 1(+)/D and N high-b ~ N low-b 4

Diffusion Tensor Imaging What effect does the direction of the diffusionsensitizing gradient have upon what we measure? y x In the 1- dimensional case (we measure D x or D y ): D y D 0, the bulk value D x <(<) D 0 D / ADC is a scalar

What effect does the direction of the diffusion-sensitizing gradient have upon what we measure? y z x In the 3- dimensional case (we measure D x,d y and D z ): D y D 0, the bulk value D x = D z <(<) D 0 D = (D x, D y, D z )

Diffusion Tensor Imaging Why not stick with vectors? Because is not z x y

The ADC is greatest along White Matter fiber tracts. Taylor et al., Biol Psychiatry, 55, 201 (2004) Courtesy Elsevier, Inc., http://www.sciencedirect.com. Used with permission.

1. There is nothing special about using tensors to characterize anisotropic diffusion. Rotate to principal frame to get eigenvalues.

Rotational Invariants for 3D Tensors. Table from: P.B. Kingsley, "Introduction to Diffusion Tensor Imaging Mathematics: Part I. Tensors, Rotations, and Eigenvectors." Concepts Magn Reson 28A no. 2 (2006): 101-122. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss Inc. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons., Inc. Eigenvalues = D1, D2, D3 or λ 1, λ 2, λ 3 D av = (D xx + D yy + D zz )/3

Trace Imaging and b-value Strength Set of three images with caption removed due to copyright restrictions. Figure 1 in Maier, S. E., et al. "Normal Brain and Brain Tumor: Multicomponent Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Line Scan Imaging." Radiology 219 (2001): 842-849.

Distribution of Gradient Sampling Directions Need at least 6 different sampling directions Fig 2 image + caption, from: Le Bihan, D., et al. "Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Concepts and Applications." JMRI 13, no 4 (2001): 534-546. Copyright (c) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc., a subsidiary of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Reprinted with permission of John Wiley & Sons., Inc.

Diffusion Tractography Follow Voxels With Largest Eigenvalues Being Continuous Between Two Regions of Interest Courtesy of Dr. Martha Shenton. Used with permission. Source: Shenton, M. E., M. Kubicki, and R. W. McCarley. "Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Image Acquisition and Processing Tools." SPL Technical Report 354, 2002.