The Geometry of Conjugacy Classes of Nilpotent Matrices

Similar documents
Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

16.2. Definition. Let N be the set of all nilpotent elements in g. Define N

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

Commuting nilpotent matrices and pairs of partitions

A 2 G 2 A 1 A 1. (3) A double edge pointing from α i to α j if α i, α j are not perpendicular and α i 2 = 2 α j 2

LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori

REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)

Spring 2018 CIS 610. Advanced Geometric Methods in Computer Science Jean Gallier Homework 3

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

Since G is a compact Lie group, we can apply Schur orthogonality to see that G χ π (g) 2 dg =

Multiplicity free actions of simple algebraic groups

Dirac Cohomology, Orbit Method and Unipotent Representations

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS LINEAR ALGEBRA

Representation Theory and Orbital Varieties. Thomas Pietraho Bowdoin College

L(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that

On splitting of the normalizer of a maximal torus in groups of Lie type

Fundamental Lemma and Hitchin Fibration

The Contragredient. Spherical Unitary Dual for Complex Classical Groups

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I - FINAL PROJECT

Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

ON SOME PARTITIONS OF A FLAG MANIFOLD. G. Lusztig

Plan What is a normal formal of a mathematical object? Similarity and Congruence Transformations Jordan normal form and simultaneous diagonalisation R

On the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2

Varieties of Characters

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

Algebraic groups Lecture 1

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

Kac Moody superalgebras and integrability

Notes on D 4 May 7, 2009

ON BASE SIZES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS

Defining equations for some nilpotent varieties

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

A Structure Theorem for Plesken Lie Algebras over Finite Fields

Local systems on nilpotent orbits and weighted Dynkin diagrams

Lecture 4: LS Cells, Twisted Induction, and Duality

Math 315: Linear Algebra Solutions to Assignment 7

Review problems for MA 54, Fall 2004.

On Cuspidal Spectrum of Classical Groups

Fourier Coefficients and Automorphic Discrete Spectrum of Classical Groups. Dihua Jiang University of Minnesota

About polynomiality of the Poisson semicentre for parabolic subalgebras

BLOCKS IN THE CATEGORY OF FINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF gl(m n)

Maximal non-commuting subsets of groups

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

H(G(Q p )//G(Z p )) = C c (SL n (Z p )\ SL n (Q p )/ SL n (Z p )).

ENUMERATION OF COMMUTING PAIRS IN LIE ALGEBRAS OVER FINITE FIELDS

SPHERICAL UNITARY DUAL FOR COMPLEX CLASSICAL GROUPS

6 Orthogonal groups. O 2m 1 q. q 2i 1 q 2i. 1 i 1. 1 q 2i 2. O 2m q. q m m 1. 1 q 2i 1 i 1. 1 q 2i. i 1. 2 q 1 q i 1 q i 1. m 1.

1.4 Solvable Lie algebras

1: Lie groups Matix groups, Lie algebras

Matrix Lie groups. and their Lie algebras. Mahmood Alaghmandan. A project in fulfillment of the requirement for the Lie algebra course

Extremal Problems for Spaces of Matrices

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

Symmetric Functions and the Symmetric Group 6 B. G. Wybourne

Recognition of Classical Groups of Lie Type

Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik Bonn

MODULI OF ALGEBRAIC SL 3 -VECTOR BUNDLES OVER ADJOINT REPRESENTATION

ELEMENTARY SUBALGEBRAS OF RESTRICTED LIE ALGEBRAS

SYLLABUS. 1 Linear maps and matrices

Endoscopic character relations for the metaplectic group

Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010

A NOTE ON THE JORDAN CANONICAL FORM

Definition 9.1. The scheme µ 1 (O)/G is called the Hamiltonian reduction of M with respect to G along O. We will denote by R(M, G, O).

Modular representations of symmetric groups: An Overview

Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight

Math 304 Fall 2018 Exam 3 Solutions 1. (18 Points, 3 Pts each part) Let A, B, C, D be square matrices of the same size such that

On the number of real classes in the finite projective linear and unitary groups

5 Quiver Representations

Some remarks on Nakajima s quiver varieties of type A

Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak

On the singular elements of a semisimple Lie algebra and the generalized Amitsur-Levitski Theorem

Cartan s Criteria. Math 649, Dan Barbasch. February 26

REPRESENTATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE: EXERCISES. Notation. 1. GL n

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS

ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM PROBLEMS

An inclusion between sets of orbits and surjectivity of the restriction map of rings of invariants

Parabolic subgroups Montreal-Toronto 2018

On the unitary dual of classical and exceptional real split groups. Alessandra Pantano, University of California, Irvine MIT, March, 2010

Gelfand Pairs and Invariant Distributions

Fundamental theorem of modules over a PID and applications

N-WEAKLY SUPERCYCLIC MATRICES

Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

Maximal subgroups of exceptional groups: representing groups in groups

Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits

DUALITY, CENTRAL CHARACTERS, AND REAL-VALUED CHARACTERS OF FINITE GROUPS OF LIE TYPE

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS

(Kac Moody) Chevalley groups and Lie algebras with built in structure constants Lecture 1. Lisa Carbone Rutgers University

Counting symmetric nilpotent matrices

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

Linear vector spaces and subspaces.

Some properties of index of Lie algebras

THREE CASES AN EXAMPLE: THE ALTERNATING GROUP A 5

1. Group Theory Permutations.

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 8 Nov 2008

Transcription:

The Geometry of Conjugacy Classes of Nilpotent Matrices A 5 A 3 A 1 A1 Alessandra Pantano A 2 A 2 a 2 a 2 Oliver Club Talk, Cornell April 14, 2005 a 1 a 1 a 3 a 5 References: H. Kraft and C. Procesi, Minimal Singularities in GLn, Invent. Math. 62, 1981 David H. Collingwood, William M. McGovern, Nilpotent orbits in semisimple Lie algebras 1

Introduction g = complex classical Lie algebra N= set of nilpotent matrices in g G = the adjoint group = G/Z(G) G acts on N by conjugation The orbits are conjugacy classes Combinatorial description Formula for the dimension Geometric description of N 2

Remarks Why NILPOTENT? There are only finitely many c.c. of nilpotent matrices Why should g be classical? If g gl(n), we can use the standard representation of g on N to obtain a classification of c.c. via partitions of N 3

Outline of the talk Part 1 Combinatorial description of nilpotent orbits Part 2 Dimension of nilpotent orbits Part 3 Partial ordering of nilpotent orbits 4

The easy case: g = sl(n) g = sl (n) = {X M n ( ) :tr(x) = 0} SL(n) = {A M n ( ) : det(a) = 1} G = PSL(n) = SL(n) / Z N = all nilpotent matrices The GL n, SL n PSL n -conjugacy classes coincide! A X A 1 = A det(a) X A det(a) 1 = n A det(a) X n A det(a) 1 We can use the theory of Jordan forms. 5

Partition-type Classification for g=sl(n) Conjugacy classes of nilpotent n x n matrices Normal Jordan Block Form J p1 0... 0 0 J p2... 0 J = 0 0 0 J pd 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J i = 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Partitions of n π = (p 1 p 2... p d ) d i=1 p i = n Young Diagrams 6

The example of sl(5) (5) (4,1) (3,2) Partitions of 5 pametrize the the nilpotent conjugacy classes in sl(5) (2,2,1) (2,1,1,1) (1,1,1,1,1) 7

The not so easy cases: g = so(2n), so(2n+1), sp(2n) Problems: 1. Conjugation by G is no longer equivalent to conjugation by GL N 2. You can t use Jordan forms to represent a conjugacy class, because a matrix in Jordan form does not belong to g Nonetheless, we can still use partitions to parametrize the c.c. 8

Because g gl(n) we can make use of the standard representation ρ of g on N you need to know: 1. For each X nilpotent, there is a standard triple {X, Y, H} H semisimple (diagonalizable) and < X,Y, H > sl(2, ) 2. Each f.d. representation of sl(2, ) decomposes into a sum of irreducibles g with 3. Up to equivalence, sl(2, ) has exactly one irreducible representation λ k in each dimension k. 9

Partition associated with an orbit Given X nilpotent, fix the standard triple {X,Y,H} ρ = standard repr. of g on N Restrict to sl(2)=<x,y,h> ρ = λ n1 + λ n2 +...+ λ nd Pick the sizes of the irred. summands π = n 1 + n 2 +... + n d π is the partition associated to X!!! 10

Partition-type Classification for g=so(2n+1) Nilpotent c.c. are in 1-1 correspondence with partitions of (2n+1) in which even parts appear with even multiplicity Nilpotent c.c. for sl(5) (5) (4,1) (3,2) (2, 2,1) (2,1,1) (1,1,1,1,1) Nilpotent c.c. for so(5) (5) (2, 2,1) (1,1,1,1,1) 11

Partition-type Classification for g=sp(2n) Nilpotent c.c. are in 1-1 correspondence with partitions of (2n) in which odd parts appear with even multiplicity Nilpotent c.c. for sl(4) Nilpotent c.c. for sp(4) (4) (3,1) (2,2) (2,1,1) (1,1,1,1) (4) (2,2) (2,1,1) (1,1,1,1) 12

Partition-type Classification for g=so(2n) Nilpotent c.c. are parametrized by partitions of (2n) in which even parts appear with even multiplicity. The correspondence is almost 1-1. Very even partitions ( i.e. partitions with only even parts, each appearing with even multiplicity) correspond to two distinct nilpotent c.c., so they should be counted twice. 13

Partition-type Classification for g=so(2n) Even parts appear with even multiplicity Very even partitions represent two orbits Nilpotent c.c. for sl(4) Nilpotent c.c. for so(4) (4) (3,1) (2,2) (2,1,1) (1,1,1,1) (3,1) (2,2),(2,2) (1,1,1,1) 14

Remarks Why do we get a parity condition on the partitions??? For all g=sl(n), nilpotent c.c. are parametrized by partitions with an even number of rows of even/odd length. Why? To treat all cases at once we need some notations: ε <, > ε = +1, -1 = a non degerate bilinear form of parity ε g = the Lie subalgebra of sl(n) preserving <,> ε = {X : <Xv,w> = -<v,xw> for all v, w} I = the isotropy group of <,> ε ε = {x in GL n : <xv,xw> = <v,w> for all v, w} ε ε ε ε ε 15

π Let be the partition associated to a conjugacy class and let n k be the number of parts of π of length k. We can construct a vector space of dim n k with a non-degenerate bilinear form. This form is symplectic for ε =1, k even and for ε = - 1, k odd. For such combination of ε and k, the dimension n k of the vector space must be even. The result is a parity condition on the number of rows with even/odd length: g=so(2n), so(2n+1) ε =+1 n even is even g=sp(2n) ε = -1 n odd is even 16

Remarks Why is the correspondence not 1-1 in the case of so(2n)??? The set of partitions satisfying the proper parity condition is always in 1-1 correspondence with the set of nilpotent c.c. under the isotropy group. If g=so(2n), each c.c. under the isotropy group I coincides with a c.c. under the adjoint group G. ε If g=so(2n), then an I - c.c. coincides with a G- c.c. ε only if the partition is not very even. When the partition is very even, then an I ε- c.c. splits into two distinct G- c.c.. 17

Outline of the talk Part 1 Combinatorial description of nilpotent orbits Part 2 Dimension of nilpotent orbits Part 3 Partial ordering of nilpotent orbits 18

Notations Dual Partition: 7 3 3 2 2 2 7 3 3 2 2 2 π = (p 1 p 2... p d ) ˆπ = ( ˆp 1 ˆp 2... ˆp d ) = (7,3,3,2,2,2) = (6,6,4,1,1,1,1) Let T be the Y.d. of π filled up with odd integers: Then j 1 π ( ˆp j ) 2 = Sum of the entries in T π 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 5 5 7 7 7 9 9 11 11 19

Dimension of a nilpotent orbit π = (p 1 p d ) sl(n) n 2 j 1 ˆp 2 i so(2n) so(2n+1) 2n 2 n 1 2 2n 2 + n 1 2 ˆp 2 i + 1 i 1 2 # Odd Parts ˆp 2 i + 1 i 1 2 # Odd Parts sp(2n) 2n 2 + n 1 2 ˆp 2 i 1 i 1 2 # Odd Parts 20

Examples of dimension of orbits π = (4,4,2,1,1) is a partition of 12 with an even number of odd parts. It represents both a c.c. in sl(12) and a c.c. in sp(12). i 1 ˆp 2 i = sum of entries in = 42. As a c.c in sl(12) : dim = n 2 i 1 ˆp 2 i = 102 As a c.c in sp(12) : dim = 2n 2 + n 1 2 ˆp 2 i # 1 i 1 2 odd parts = 56. 21

Outline of the talk Part 1 Combinatorial description of nilpotent orbits Part 2 Dimension of nilpotent orbits Part 3 Partial ordering of nilpotent orbits 22

Partial ordering N is an affine algebraic variety in dim(g) (being nilpotent is a polynomial condition). Use the Zarinski topology. Nilpotent orbits form a stratification of N : every nilpotent matrix is in exactly one conjugacy class (stratum), and the closure of a stratum is a union of strata. Partial Ordering of Nilpotent orbits: O A O B O A O B Analytically: rank(a k ) rank(b k ) for all k>0. 23

Partial ordering in terms of partitions O A O B rank(a k ) rank(b k ), k>0 We need to relate rank(a k ) to the partition representing O A π Rank(A)= # boxes in π- 1 st column Rank(A 2 )= # boxes in π- 2nd column Rank(A 3 )= # boxes in π- 3 rd column. 24

Moving down some boxes A B If B is obtained from A by moving down boxes, then O B is in the closure of O A i.e. O B O A Let us compare the ranks of A k and B k : A B A B Rank(A) = Rank(B) Rank(A 2 ) = Rank(B 2 ) A B A B Rank(A 3 ) = Rank(B 3 ) Rank(A 4 ) > Rank(B 4 ) 25

Minimal Degeneration The closure O A of a nilpotent orbit is a union of orbits. If O B O A i.e. O B O A, we say that O B is a degeneration of O A. If O B is also open in O A, we say that O B is a minimal degeneration. In this case there is no orbit O C such that O B O C O A O B and O A are adjacent orbits w.r.t. the partial ordering. A degeneration is obtained by moving down some boxes Careful!! The result must be again an acceptable partition. 26

Example of degeneration This is a minimal degeneration in sl(13) but not a degeneration in so(13) NOTE: In so(13) every even part must appear with even multiplicity This is a degeneration in sl(13) and a minimal degeneration in so(13) 27

Minimal degenerations in sl(n) A minimal degeneration is obtained by moving down one box with two elementary operations: RED OPERATION move a box down to the next row BLUE OPERATION move a box down to the next column 28

The diagram of minimal degenerations for sl(n) n=2 n=3 29 n=4 29

The diagram of minimal degenerations for sp(4) sl(4) sp(4) In sp(4), every odd part must appear with even multiplicity 30

The diagram of minimal degenerations for so(4) sl(4) so(4) In so(4), every even part must appear with even multiplicity. Very even partitions represent two orbits. 31

Remarks What do we gain from the diagram of minimal degenerations? a complete list of the nilpotent orbits an algorithm to compute the closure of a nilpotent orbit an algorithm to compute the dimension of a nilpotent orbit 32

The closure of an orbit in sl(6) The closure of (3,3) consists of all the partitions sitting below (3,3) in this diagram. 33

The general picture for sl(n) The biggest! open and dense in N 2 nd biggest O subr. =N- O reg. fuzzy structure 2 nd smallest O min =O mun u O Z The smallest! Closed, dim. 0 34

The general picture for so(2n), so(2n+1), sp(2n) 35

An algorithm to compute the dimension of an orbit in sl(n) We use the formula i 1 ˆp 2 i dim(o)= n 2 - = n 2 - # of entries in to compare the dim.s of adjacent orbits. Red operation: move a box to the next row d A - d B = 2 A B Blue operation: move a box to the next column d A - d B = 11-5= 6 = A B = 2 (# of rows jumped) 36 36

Dimension of Nilpotent Orbits in sl( 6) 30 =n 2 -n =dimn 28 26 22 red operation: Δd = 2 blue operation: Δd = = # of rows jumped 37 37