Volume XVII, Number July Chasing Petioles

Similar documents
Volume XIV, Number 1 January 6, 2014

Nutrient status of potatoes grown on compost amended soils as determined by sap nitrate levels.

N Management in Potato Production. David Mulla, Carl Rosen, Tyler Nigonand Brian Bohman Dept. Soil, Water & Climate University of Minnesota

Remote Sensing as a Tool to Manage Nitrogen for Irrigated Potato Production

Nutrient Recommendations for Russet Burbank Potatoes in Southern Alberta

3. Potato / HARS / CPB Systemic Trial

2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1

VEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS 2009

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN AND DRY BEAN CROPS

Sugar Beet Petiole Tests as a Measure Of Soil Fertility

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN VARIOUS CROPS

Foliar Application of 2,4-D Reduces Damage to Potato Tubers by Common Scab

Growth Stages of Wheat: Identification and Understanding Improve Crop Management

over the next three weeks could lower this estimate significantly. Near perfect conditions are needed to realize this projected yield.

Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2004.

Response of Russet Potato to Source and Rate of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application

Garden Mum Crop Scheduling October 3, 2018 Mark Smith

Background and Assumptions

Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems

PREDICTING THE ONSET AND SEVERITY OF POTATO LATE BLIGHT IN OREGON

Guide to the Late Blight Decision Support System (DSS) For Potatoes and Tomatoes

WHEN CAN YOU SEED FALLOW GROUND IN THE FALL? AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON FALL RAIN

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN ONION AFTER THREE YEARS OF CORN HERBICIDES

EVALUATiON OF YUKON HERBICIDE RATES FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN GROWN IN ROTATIONS FOLLOWED BY ONION

Trial Report: Slicing Cucumber Variety Evaluation Spring 2014

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: February 15, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN LIBERTY AND ROUNDUP RESISTANT SUGAR BEETS

Variability of Reference Evapotranspiration Across Nebraska

EFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS

September 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

Background and Assumptions

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS

OPTIMIZING NITROGEN USE AND EVALUATING ETHEPHON USE IN WAXY BARLEY

Oregon Water Conditions Report April 17, 2017

ZANER WHEN DOES WEATHER MATTER? For more information, call: Or visit: Zaner is proud to present

WeatherManager Weekly

Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions

PREDICTING THE SPREAD AND SEVERITY OF POTATO LATE BLIGHT (PHYTOPHTHORA INFES TANS) IN OREGON, 2003

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

November 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

VitiNotes. Grapevine nutrition 3: Petiole analysis

Evaluation of rapid field methods for determining the nitrogen status of potato crops

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs

Weird and Wild World of Physiological Disorders. Andy Robinson, Ph.D. Extension Potato Agronomist NDSU / U of

Background and Assumptions

Monthly Long Range Weather Commentary Issued: APRIL 1, 2015 Steven A. Root, CCM, President/CEO

viti-notes [grapevine nutrition] Petiole analysis

Impact on Agriculture

PREDICTING THE SPREAD AND SEVERITY OF POTATO LATE BLIGHT (PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS) IN OREGON, 2002

Background & Assumptions

Enterprise Budget Cherries, Sweet, Fresh Market, High-Density, North Central Region AEB 0031, May 2012 Capital Typical Farm Machinery and Equipment

List of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:

SEA ICE PREDICTION NETWORK (SIPN) Template for Pan-Arctic Sea Ice Outlook Core Contributions August 2015 Report

EXAMINATION OF MODELS FOR THE PREDICTION OF THE ONSET AND SEVERITY OF POTATO LATE BLIGHT IN OREGON

Title Sorghum/Cotton Rotation under Extreme Deficit Irrigation Conditions. Location Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Halfway, TX

those in Arizona. This period would extend through the fall equinox (September 23, 1993). Thus, pending variation due to cloudiness, total light flux

Use of the Chlorophyll Meter to Guide In-season Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications in Irrigated Cotton

2016 Soybean Vein Necrosis Disease Survey

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION IN INCHES

The Problem ADVANCED TECHNIQUES IN CUT FLOWER PRODUCTION: INCREASING STEM LENGTH AND STRENGTH. Where Are You Growing It? What Can I Do About It?

USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH NOTE NE-198

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

Background and Assumptions

VALIDATION AND ADAPTATION OF THE "BLITECAST" MODEL FOR PREDICTING DEVELOPMENT OF POTATO LATE BLIGHT IN OREGON

Estimated Costs and Returns for Establishing And Producing Asparagus in Washington in 2009

Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions

ACCUMULATED PRECIPITATION IN INCHES

Avocado Thrips Subproject 2: Pesticide Evaluations and Phenology in the Field

Location Field 30 at the University of Delaware Research and Education Center Farm, Georgetown, DE.

Pest Management in Potatoes

Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions

NIDIS Weekly Climate, Water and Drought Assessment Summary. Upper Colorado River Basin

2008 Growing Season. Niagara Region

Snapdragon Lighting. Harrison Flint. Cornell University. ing mid-winter. Several good approaches to this problem

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System October 17, 2017

Process Behavior Analysis Understanding Variation

Development of Agrometeorological Models for Estimation of Cotton Yield

Prepare for Spring Ghouls. Weather

ALS-Resistant Kochia Management in a Corn - Sugarbeet Rotation 2005 to 2006 and 2007 to Robert Wilson

2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Alfalfa Hay Establishment in Grain Stubble Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions

Christopher ISU

2015 Update Mtg: Weed Biology Affects Weed Management

Crop / Weather Update

ph and Liming Practices Kent Martin Stafford County 1/5/2010

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

At the Midpoint of the 2008

Teacher s Discussion Notes Part 1

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System October 30, 2018

2012 Growing Season. Niagara Report. Wayne Heinen

The Effect of the No-Burn Ban on the Economic Viability of Producing Bluegrass Seed in Select Areas of Washington State

How to Maximize Preemergence Herbicide Performance for Summer Annual Weeds

ORNAMENTALS NORTHWEST ARCHIVES

What is insect forecasting, and why do it

Assessment Schedule 2016 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of biological ideas relating to micro-organisms (90927)

Great Lakes Update. Volume 199: 2017 Annual Summary. Background

Climate Change Impact on Air Temperature, Daily Temperature Range, Growing Degree Days, and Spring and Fall Frost Dates In Nebraska

SEAGRASS COVERAGE TRENDS IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SYSTEM

Unit C: Usage of Graphics in Agricultural Economics. Lesson 3: Understanding the Relationship of Data, Graphics, and Statistics

Ash Cap Influences on Site Productivity and Fertilizer Response in Forests of the Inland Northwest

Transcription:

Research & Extension for the Potato Industry of Idaho, Oregon, & Washington Andrew Jensen, Editor. ajensen@potatoes.com; 509-760-4859 www.nwpotatoresearch.com Volume XVII, Number 12 25 July 2017 Chasing Petioles Mark J. Pavek, N. Richard Knowles, Zachary J. Holden Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, 99164-6414, USA Introduction Many growers, especially those who fertigate, track petiole and soil nutrient levels across the season. The sampling frequency varies, but once per week is typical. The underlying goal is to provide actively growing plants nutrients as they need them. A common industry term for these on-demand nutrient applications is spoon-feeding. Soil values are tracked to provide insight into nutrient soil reserves while the petioles provide an indication of plant health relative to nutrient status and growth stage. Literature indicating proper soil and petiole values for the major nutrients (N, P, K) exists for many potato growing regions. The values were likely established following several years of research with one or more common varieties. Petiole analysis can provide meaningful data; however, nutrient values can be skewed by deficit or excessive irrigation, growth compromising issues like disease, insect feeding, herbicide sensitivity, and non-typical growth due to abnormal weather conditions. Moreover, the petiole analysis is only as good as the sample collected and the size of that sample. To properly understand the data from petiole analysis, one needs to take into account petiole sample size and quality, soil nutrient status, growing degree days/heat units and their effect on plant growth, plant growth stage, potential nutrient release from slow-release fertilizers or decomposing organic matter, and plant health. Because so many factors affect petiole nutrient status, interpreting the data may be more of an art than a science. Of all fertilizers, Nitrogen (N), typically urea ammonium nitrate (UAN, Solution-32), is fertigated in the largest quantities. Plant growth responds very well to in-season N applications and this is often demonstrated through petiole nitrate analysis. During years with typical growing conditions (typical = lacking temperature and moisture extremes at abnormal times), maintaining recommended petiole values is easier than during non-typical years, especially if conditions in the non-typical years are such that plants grow extremely fast upon emergence. Rapid foliar growth leads to high demand for nutrients, especially nitrogen. If your soil N is inadequate for rapid foliar growth, your petiole nitrate values may decline rapidly. Under these conditions, multiple N applications through the irrigation system may not bring the petioles back within the recommended ranges for several weeks, if at all during the season. Will you see reduced yield and economic return if you don t keep your petioles within the recommended ranges? Not necessarily. We ve seen some of the best potato yields during the non-typical years when petioles did not behave.

Ten Years of Nitrogen Research across Eighteen Potato Varieties Across 10 years (2007-16), we tested eighteen potato varieties under four full season nitrogen rates, typically 150-, 250-, 350-, and 450-lbs N/acre. Approximately 75- to 125-lbs N/acre was available in the soil prior to planting (soil residual + pre-plant urea broadcast). The remaining N (UAN, Soln 32) was applied once to twice weekly at rates between 0- and 40-lbs/A via a flood sprayer (overhead irrigation fertigation simulator) between tuber initiation (early June, 50-60 days after planting) and the mid to late tuber bulk (late July, 100-110 DAP) (Table 1). Petiole and soil samples were collected weekly or bi-weekly between June and early August. The crop was allowed to grow between 150- and 180-DAP prior to harvest. Following harvest, tubers were separated into typical U.S. yield and cull grades and internal and external quality was evaluated. N fertilizer cost-adjusted gross return was calculated for either the fresh (baked potato) or process (French fry) market. Each year, the experimental N rates were applied blindly without regard for petiole values. Petioles were tracked to proof the N rates, they were not used to drive the applications. The goal was to provide the plants with N weekly to twice weekly within a reasonable growth window. Application rates varied from 10 to 40 lbs/a (Table 1). During rapid foliage growth (after tuber initiation and up to peak canopy growth (approx. 95 to 110 days after planting) most of the N was applied for each rate, however, the in-season total for each rate was split into 8-9 applications, tapering off near the end of July/first of August (Table 1). The exception was the lowest rates. They may have only received N during the first two to four applications, or upon satisfying the predetermined quantity. Table 1. In-season and full-season nitrogen rates and application intervals for each experimental rate (150-, 250-, 350-, and 450-lbs/A N). The application intervals and in-season quantities shown here are typical of the strategy used across 10 years of N research on eighteen potato varieties at the WSU-Othello Research Center located in central WA. 21 DAE + 7 days + 6 days + 4 days + 6 days + 7 days + 7 days + 7 days + 7 days 10-12 inch Plant Height In- Season Full- Season Treatmt Rate 9 Jun 16 Jun 22 Jun 26 Jun 2 Jul 9 Jul 16 Jul 22 Jul 31 Jul N Rates N Rates --------------------------------------------------------------------lbs/a ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 150 20 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 150 250 25 25 20 20 20 10 10 0 0 130 250 350 30 30 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 230 350 450 40 40 40 40 40 35 35 30 30 330 450 120 lbs/a pre-plant + soil residual N, All other nutrients non-limiting and applied pre-plant -Used solution 32-0-0, Urea Ammonium Nitrate -Each treatment was applied using 0.10 inches of water Lessons Learned Even though nitrogen rates and application timings were similar each year, petiole nutrient levels never tracked the same. Petiole nitrate values fluctuated yearly, weekly, and across varieties; however, the differences among the four nitrogen rates were clear during most years. Clearwater Russet petiole nitrates are shown as an example of rate differences and yearly and weekly fluctuations (Figure 1). Page 2

Petiole NO 3 -N % 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Clearwater Russet 2014 150 In-Season N 250 In-Season N 350 In-Season N 450 In-Season N 0.0 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Days After Planting Petiole NO 3 -N % 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Clearwater Russet 2015 150 lbs In-Season N 250 lbs In-Season N 350 lbs In-Season N 450 lbs In-Season N 0.0 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Days After Planting Figure 1. Clearwater Russet petiole nitrate values across time during 2014-15 for four full-season nitrogen rate treatments (150-, 250-, 350-, and 450-lbs/A N). During several rapid early-growth years (especially 2016), the petiole nitrate values dropped well below what one might consider acceptable, even with regular N applications and full-season rates of up to 450 lbs/a. As an example, Clearwater Russet petiole nitrate values from the 2016 350 lbs/a treatment are shown in Figure 2 along with the recommended petiole N range (Figure 2). Despite relatively low petiole nitrate values during rapid early-growth years, economic return was as good as, and often better than, those found in the more typical production years. Clearwater petiole nitrate levels during 2016 were up to 60% below the recommended values (Figure 2), however, the total yield for Clearwater Russet in 2016 was 40% higher than the average yield of the 2014-15 seasons. Petiole values for the 350 lbs/a rate were much closer to the recommended values during the 2014-15 seasons. Petiole Nitrate (%NO3-N) 3.2 Clearwater Russet 2.4 1.6 0.8 0.0 Columbia Basin Recommended Petiole N 2016 Observed Petiole N June 15 June 30 July 15 July 30 Figure 2. During 2016, petiole nitrate values declined rapidly (2016 Observed Petiole N) due to rapid plant growth during non-typically warm weather in May and June, even though N was applied once or twice weekly (Table 1). The 2016 observed petiole N is from the 350 lbs/a treatment. Total yield in 2016 was 40% greater than the yield average from 2014-15, even though petioles from 2014-15 were closer to the recommended nitrate range than those from 2016. Ten years of research also revealed that over 90% of the time the nitrogen rate required to maximize tuber yield was greater than that used to maximum economic yield. Alturas is shown as an example in Figure 3. Page 3

Twenty nine percent of the 18 varieties tested produced maximum economic returns with less than 350 lbs/a of N, 53% used between 350- and 400-lbs/A, and 23% used more than 400 lbs/a. Averaged across all varieties, the maximum tuber yield required 399 lbs/a of N while the maximum economic yield was realized with 348 lbs/a of N. The maximum economic yield was achieved with 51 lbs/a less N, or 15% less, than was required to maximize tuber yield. Adjusted Gross Return (% diff. from 150 lbs/a rate) 40 30 20 10 0 Alturas 3-Year Average Total Yield Maximum economic return at 370 lbs/a Maximum yield at at 420 lbs/a Adjusted gross 150 250 350 450 800 750 700 650 Total Yield (CWT/A) Nitrogen Rate (lbs/a) Figure 3. Alturas fertilizer cost-adjusted gross return and total yield averaged across 3 years. Maximum economic return was realized with 370 lbs/a N while maximum yield required another 50 lbs of N. Ninety percent of the time across ten years of research and eighteen potato varieties the maximum economic return was realized with less nitrogen than the maximum total yield. Summary The ultimate goal of all producers should be to produce the yield that maximizes grower return, or the economic yield. All too often, the goal is to produce the maximum yield for the given situation. Because sufficient economic return is key for businesses to remain competitive and maintain production, one must consider the law of diminishing returns. At some point, higher yields from additional inputs (more fert, protectants, etc.) become too expensive to achieve. The potential economic gain in yield increase from each additional input is eventually offset by the cost of those inputs. In other words, when one maximizes yield, they are not always maximizing economic return. Following pre-plant soil nutrient analysis, fertilizer target rates should be established for the variety, expected days of growth, and soil type. Petiole values alone should not drive in-season nutrient applications. They should be used as a guide in combination with target rates and soil nutrient levels. We ve learned that when Page 4

petiole values appear unfavorable, the best strategy is to maintain your targeted applications and apply the season total fertilizer you initially intended. We recommend applying pre-plant or at-planting nitrogen so there is 75- to 150-lbs/A of available N (soil residual + applied) in the root zone at emergence. Weekly or twice-weekly applications of nitrogen from tuber initiation through mid-bulk (June and July/early August in the Columbia Basin, see Table 1) will most likely keep the plants happy and healthy, even if the petiole nitrate values are lower than recommended. From our research, we compiled recommended nitrogen target rates along with petiole nitrate values for different calendar dates (Table 2). Columbia Basin growers should strive to hit the season total N targets listed. Growers in shorter growing seasons should adjust accordingly. Petiole and soil samples should be collected prior to row closure and continue through the season until late bulking (once every 2 weeks is adequate). Soil N should be at or below 50 lbs/a by mid-august and plants kept healthy via spoon-feeding of nitrogen. With low soil N and the cessation of N applications prior to mid-august, plants will be able to adequately mature during August and September. For nutrient recommendations other than N, growers should follow the nutrient management guidelines established for Russet Burbank: Lang N.S., R.G. Stevens, R.E. Thornton, W.L. Pan and S. Victory. 1999. Nutrient management guide: Central Washington irrigated potatoes. WSU Experiment Station Extension Bulletin EB1882. Table 2. Full-season nitrogen target rates for 150-180 days of growth in the Columbia Basin of Washington and Oregon along with target petiole rates during June and July. Growers should strive to have 75- to 150-lbs/A of nitrogen in the soil (residual + applied) at emergence and apply the remainder during the season via irrigation (fertigation). To ensure plant maturity, stop nitrogen applications prior to mid-august. Full Season Nitrogen Petiole Nitrate Target Concentrations Variety Target Rate June 15 June 30 July 15 July 30 Process Market Recommendations lbs/a -----------------% NO 3-N------------------ Alpine Russet 370 2.9 2.3 2.0 1.7 Alturas 370 2.6 3.0 2.2 1.5 Classic Russet 360 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 Clearwater Russet 375 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.5 Mountain Gem Russet 340 2.6 2.3 2.0 1.8 Owyhee Russet 325 2.8 2.5 2.1 1.7 Payette Russet 425 2.5 2.8 2.2 1.6 Ranger Russet 360 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.3 Russet Burbank 350 2.6 2.2 2.0 1.7 Sage Russet 375 3.1 2.8 2.6 2.4 Teton Russet 350 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.0 Umatilla Russet 400 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.1 Fresh Market Recommendations Classic Russet 330 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.8 Mountain Gem Russet 300 2.6 2.1 1.8 1.6 Teton Russet 325 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.8 Page 5

Volume 17, No. 12 Page 6