On the detection of kev scale neutrino dark matter in β decay

Similar documents
Bounds on sterile neutrino using full kinematic reconstruction of radioactive decays

Heavy Sterile Neutrinos at CEPC

kev sterile Neutrino Dark Matter in Extensions of the Standard Model

Flavor Models with Sterile Neutrinos. NuFact 11 Geneva, Aug, He Zhang

Oak Ridge and Neutrinos eharmony forms another perfect couple

Neutrino masses, dark matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe

Sterile Neutrinos in Cosmology and Astrophysics

Invisible Sterile Neutrinos

Minimal Extension of the Standard Model of Particle Physics. Dmitry Gorbunov

Production mechanisms for kev sterile neutrino dark matter in the Early Universe

Detecting Dark Matter in the X-ray

Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter & Low Scale Leptogenesis from a Charged Scalar

Prospects for the Direct Detection of the Cosmic Neutrino Background

DARK MATTER. Martti Raidal NICPB & University of Helsinki Tvärminne summer school 1

Neutrino theory of everything? dark matter, baryogenesis and neutrino masses

1 Neutrinos. 1.1 Introduction

Thermalisation of Sterile Neutrinos. Thomas Tram LPPC/ITP EPFL

Sterile Neutrinos with WbLS! detector. Jelena Maricic! University of Hawaii at Manoa! May 17, 2014

Spectra of Cosmic Rays

Sterile neutrinos. Stéphane Lavignac (IPhT Saclay)

Sterile Neutrinos as Dark Matter. Manfred Lindner

Gravitino LSP as Dark Matter in the Constrained MSSM

Sterile Neutrino Candidates for the 3.5 kev Line. Kevork Abazajian University of California, Irvine

Overview of cosmological constraints on neutrino mass, number, and types

Cosmological constraints on the Sessaw Scale

The Hunt for Sterile Neutrinos. H. Ray, University of Florida

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Measurements of liquid xenon s response to low-energy particle interactions

Neutrino Physics: Lecture 12

IMPLICATIONS OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FOR COSMOLOGY

Sterile Neutrinos & Neutral Current Scattering

Past searches for kev neutrinos in beta-ray spectra

Solar spectrum. Nuclear burning in the sun produce Heat, Luminosity and Neutrinos. pp neutrinos < 0.4 MeV

Neutrinos and Astrophysics

Neutrino Oscillations

ECT Lecture 2. - Reactor Antineutrino Detection - The Discovery of Neutrinos. Thierry Lasserre (Saclay)

Project Paper May 13, A Selection of Dark Matter Candidates

Distinguishing Between Warm and Cold Dark Matter

Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota. High Energy seminar, University of Virginia

MICROPHYSICS AND THE DARK UNIVERSE

Neutrinos Lecture Introduction

Dark matter in split extended supersymmetry

Masses and binding energies

Sterile Neutrinos from the Top Down

Oklahoma State University. Solar Neutrinos and their Detection Techniques. S.A.Saad. Department of Physics

Neutrino Experiments with Reactors

Radio-chemical method

Neutrino Physics II. Neutrino Phenomenology. Arcadi Santamaria. TAE 2014, Benasque, September 19, IFIC/Univ. València

Possible sources of very energetic neutrinos. Active Galactic Nuclei

Daya Bay and joint reactor neutrino analysis

Learning from WIMPs. Manuel Drees. Bonn University. Learning from WIMPs p. 1/29

Versatility of the Abelian Higgs Model

11 Neutrino astronomy. introduc)on to Astrophysics, C. Bertulani, Texas A&M-Commerce 1

NEUTRINO COSMOLOGY. ν e ν µ. ν τ STEEN HANNESTAD UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS PARIS, 27 OCTOBER 2006

Super-Kamiokande ~The Status of n Oscillation ~

MINOS Result. The ND analysis predicts: events in the Far Detector 54 observed, 0.7σ excess. 49.1±7.0(stat.)±2.7(syst.

Dark matter and entropy dilution

Viable production mechanism of kev sterile neutrino with large mixing angle

The Yang and Yin of Neutrinos

Beyond Standard Model Effects in Flavour Physics: p.1

MIDSUMMER EXAMINATIONS 2001 PHYSICS, PHYSICS WITH ASTROPHYSICS PHYSICS WITH SPACE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PHYSICS WITH MEDICAL PHYSICS

Is the Neutrino its Own Antiparticle?

energy loss Ionization + excitation of atomic energy levels Mean energy loss rate de /dx proportional to (electric charge) 2 of incident particle

Neutrinos and Cosmos. Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) Texas Conference at Stanford Dec 17, 2004

Proton decay and neutrino astrophysics with the future LENA detector

PHYS 5326 Lecture #2. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu. Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2007 PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu

Analysis of Neutrino Oscillation experiments

PHYS 5326 Lecture #6. 1. Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2. Neutrino Oscillation Measurements

Implications of cosmological observables for particle physics: an overview

PHY326/426 Dark Matter and the Universe. Dr. Vitaly Kudryavtsev F9b, Tel.:

Particle Physics: Neutrinos part II

November 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model

Neutrino mixing. Outline: description/review of mixing phenomenology possible experimental signatures short review of existing experimental results

Neutrino Signals from Dark Matter Decay

Space-Time Symmetries

Solar and atmospheric neutrinos as background for direct dark matter searches

Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics

Dark Radiation from Particle Decay

PHY492: Nuclear & Particle Physics. Lecture 8 Fusion Nuclear Radiation: β decay

Neutrino Mass Hierarchy and Mixing Parameters: Long-baseline Measurements with IceCube Laura Bodine

NEUTRINO OSCILLOMETRY- Neutrinos in a box

Scalar field dark matter and the Higgs field

Standard Model of Particle Physics SS 2013

Cosmic Neutrinos. Chris Quigg Fermilab. XXXV SLAC Summer Institute Dark Matter 10 August 2007

WIMP Velocity Distribution and Mass from Direct Detection Experiments

Neutrino Basics. m 2 [ev 2 ] tan 2 θ. Reference: The Standard Model and Beyond, CRC Press. Paul Langacker (IAS) LSND 90/99% SuperK 90/99% MINOS K2K

What We Know, and What We Would Like To Find Out. Boris Kayser Minnesota October 23,

DARK MATTER MEETS THE SUSY FLAVOR PROBLEM

Status of Solar Neutrino Oscillations

NEUTRINOS. Concha Gonzalez-Garcia. San Feliu, June (Stony Brook-USA and IFIC-Valencia)

THE UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA

Discovery of the Neutrino Mass-I. P1X* Frontiers of Physics Lectures October 2004 Dr Paul Soler University of Glasgow

SHiP: Search for Hidden Particles A new experiment proposal at CERN

Ricochet Proposal and Current Efforts. Alexander F. Leder

Neutrinos: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Stanley Wojcicki SLAC Summer Institute 2010 August 13, 2010

Self-interacting asymmetric dark matter

arxiv: v3 [hep-ph] 25 Oct 2017

PoS(ICHEP2016)474. SoLid: Search for Oscillations with a Lithium-6 Detector at the SCK CEN BR2 reactor

Supernova Neutrinos in Future Liquid-Scintillator Detectors

R. D. McKeown. Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary

Transcription:

On the detection of kev scale neutrino dark matter in β decay experiment Wei LIAO U East China University of Science and Technology uànóœæ Workshop CIAS Meudon 2012 6 June 2012, Paris

Content Content: Why kev scale sterile neutrino warm dark matter Models and constraints of kev scale sterile neutrino DM Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay Detection of ν s DM using capture by radioactive nuclei Other proposals to detect ν s DM Summary

Why kev scale sterile neutrino warm dark matter Astronomical evidence suggests kev scale warm dark matter. see numerous lectures in this workshop

Why kev scale sterile neutrino warm dark matter Virtue of kev scale DM for particle theorists GeV scale DM should be stable or has lifetime longer than the age of the universe some quantum number should guarantee its stability; extra global or discrete symmetry needed in theory symmetry usually put in by hand, not natural for theorists, e.g. R parity put in by hand in supersymmetry kev scale DM naturally has long lifetime since it does not have enough phase space for decay extra quantum number is not needed and no extra symmetry put in by hand

Why kev scale sterile neutrino warm dark matter We consider kev scale sterile neutrino dark matter ν s decay rate is suppressed by its small mass, no extra global quantum number is needed ν s decays mainly through ν s ν + 2 ν, 2ν + ν: τ νs = 5. 10 26 s ( ) 5 1 kev 10 8 m νs Θ 2 Θ 2 = θ es 2 + θ µs 2 + θ τs 2. τ νs much larger than the age of the universe 10 17 s ν s is a good dark matter candidate

kev scale sterile neutrino dark matter ν s dark matter can be produced in the early universe through oscillation of active neutrinos to sterile neutrino It is proportional to the square of the νl ν s mixing: sin 2 θ ls. For sin 2 θ ls 10 8, ν s produced can account for all Ω dm. For sin 2 θ ls > 10 8, ν s is overproduced and its density can be reduced if reheating happens after ν s DM production. It can be resonantly enhanced if some condition for matter density can be satisfied. or through the decay of a singlet scalar or other particles Detailed correlation of ν s DM density with θ ls depends on the model of ν s DM.

kev scale sterile neutrino dark matter and models kev scale ν s dark matter in low energy seesaw model (kev scale ν R1 and GeV scale ν R2,3, νsm or νmsm) (Asaka, Blanchet and Shaposhnikov, 2005) ν s is identified as the kev ν R1 in this model masses and mixings of active neutrinos can be explained in this model active neutrino masses either normal or inverse hierarchy large mixing of ν R2,3 with active neutrinos can be achieved This type of models of kev scale ν s DM have been extensively discussed by many authors. Many implications and predictions have been explored.

kev scale sterile neutrino dark matter and models Is it natural to have one kev scale ν R1 and two GeV scale ν R2,3 in this νsm model? Yes, there are symmetries in the limit m νr1 0: The model has an approximate Friedberg-Lee symmetry(he, Li and Liao, 2009) : θ is a grassmann number ν R1 ν R1 + θ A U(1) symmetry is available if ν R2,3 are degenerate and m νr1 0(Shaposhnikov, 2007) Splitting of kev scale ν R1 and GeV scale ν R2,3 is natural

Major constraints on kev scale ν s dark matter s l=(e,µ, ) l s W l W W l l=(e,µ, ) ν s ν l mixing leads to radiative decay ν s ν l + γ Γ = 9α EMG 2 F 256π 4 Θ2 m 5 ν s, Θ 2 = θ 2 es + θ 2 µs + θ 2 τs Satellite X-ray observation gives Θ 2 < 1.8 10 5 ( 1 kev m νs ) 5

Major constraints on kev scale ν s dark matter Lyman α forest can build an image of the hydrogen matter density of the power spectrum of total matter Lyman α forest gives m νs > 1 10 kev This constraint depends on the initial ν s velocity distribution and in some models m νs can be as low as 1 kev

Major constraints on kev scale ν s dark matter Ω νs should be produced in the right range: = 0.23 ± 0.02, if ν s accounts for all DM < 0.23, if ν s accounts for part of DM Ω νs Ω νs This puts a constraint on Θ 2

Major constraints on kev scale ν s dark matter The constraint on Θ 2 from Ω νs depends on model of ν s DM. It depends on model of ν s production in the early universe. It is allowed to be as small as 10 9 10 10 to account for all DM in the universe. It depends on the thermal history of the early universe. It is allowed to reach 10 5 10 6 if reheating occurs after ν s DM produced

Major constraints on kev scale ν s dark matter For example, large entropy release at multi-mev scale temperature can be produced in low energy seesaw model. (Liao, 2010) When two ν R2,3 are degenerate, one of them can be long-lived like K L in Kaon system and its decay can reheat the universe. The decay produces entropy release S 1 ν R1 (ν s ) density over-produced by mixing θ ls 2 10 6 can be diluted by large entropy production velocity dispersion re-scaled by S 1/3, Lyman-α constraint weaken ν R1 (ν s ) ν l mixing can reach the X-ray observation bound Constraint on ν s DM is much weaker in this example

Major constraints on kev scale ν s dark matter Major constraints on ν s dark matter: Production of ρ νs in the right range of Ω dm, the constraint on Θ 2, depends on ν s model Lyman-α forest, constraint on m νs, depends on ν s model Satellite X-ray observation on the decay line of ν s ν + γ Model independently we have m νs > 1 kev Θ 2 < 1.8 10 5 ( 1 kev m νs ) 5

Detection of ν s DM Apparently detection of ν s dark matter is difficult: The energy scale is quite low kev Its small mixing to active neutrinos give a further suppression to its weak interaction For sin 2 θ es = 10 6 and m νs = 2 kev the ν s e scattering cross section is σ v c 1. 10 55 cm 2 But the detection of kev scale ν s DM is still possible.

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay There is a mechanism known for long to detect kev scale ν s in β decay. Due to the ν s ν e mixing, ν s can be produced in β decay N N + e + ν s At the end point of the decay spectrum, electron energy is E e = Q β m νs This decay does not give electron with energy > Q β m νs. This decay is not possible when Q β < m νs

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay 12 10 Kurie Plot (N(p)/p 2 ) 1/2 (arbitrary unit) 8 6 4 2 m =2 kev m =0 0 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 E(keV) Kurie Plot, N(p)/p 2 versus E, of β decay

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay The total β spectrum is a mixture of both decays: N N + e + ν e and N N + e + ν s The electron count rate N(p) is N(p) = N e (p, m νe ) cos 2 θ es + N s (p, m νs ) sin 2 θ es In the energy range Q β m νs < E < Q β, N s (p, m νs ) = 0 and N(p) = N e (p, m νe ) cos 2 θ es The count rate is smaller than the rate of usual β decay in this energy range.

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay Define We can find that R = 1 N(p) N e (p, 0) in energy range Q β m νs < E < Q β R = sin 2 θ es in the energy range E < Q β m νs R 0, as E 0

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay R versus E 0.1 0.01 Ratio of rates for m s =2 kev sin 2 es =0.04 R 0.001 sin 2 es =0.004 0.0001 sin 2 es =0.0004 1e-05 10 12 14 16 18 20 E(keV) Rate only analysis in experiment can be done in a few energy intervals to measure the disappearance of β events

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay 4 3.5 Kurie Plot for m s =2 kev 3 (N(p)/p 2 ) 1/2 (arbitrary unit) 2.5 2 1.5 sin 2 es =0.1 sin 2 es =0 1 0.5 0 15 16 17 18 19 20 E(keV) In Kurie plot, the slope in [Q β m νs, Q β ] range is smaller Good energy resolution is required to measure the slope

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay This type of measurement can also be used to look for ev scale sterile neutrino which is inspired by neutrino oscillation experiment For kev scale ν s the distortion to β decay spectrum is larger than for ev scale ν s. This type of measurement will have better sensitivity for kev scale ν s than for ev scale ν s.

Measurement of ν s in its admixture to β decay Previous measurements( 3 H, 187 Re) : J. J. Simpson, Phys. Rev. D24,2971(1981) K.H. Hiddenman, H. Daniel and O. Schwentker, J. Phys. G21, 639(1995) M. Galeazzi, F. Fontanelli, F. Gatti and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. Lett 86,1978(2001) Most recent measurement(prl86, 1978): sin 2 θ es < 0.01, for m νs 1 kev Sensitivity to in future experiments?

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei Measuring the kink in β decay spectrum is a direct way to measure the existence of kev scale ν s. is not yet a direct way to detect ν s dark matter in the universe. A direct laboratory detection of kev scale ν s dark matter in the universe is needed. Many people even believe that it s not possible to do direct laboratory search of kev scale ν s DM(keV scale WDM in general) in the universe.

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei I suggest to detect kev scale ν s DM using radioactive nuclei (W. Liao, Phys. Rev. D82, 073001, 2010). This is a new way to detect DM in the universe. Consider β decay nuclei with decay energy Q β : N N + e + ν e At the end point of the β decay spectrum, electron energy is E e = Q β anti-β decay nuclei can also be considered Mixing of ν s with ν e makes it possible to capture ν s DM.

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei I found (Liao, 2010) On Tritium(production rate in reactor: 0.01%) N 0.7 year 1 n νs θ es 2 3 H 10 5 cm 3 10 6 10 kg On 106 Ru(production rate in reactor: 0.4%) N 16 year 1 Lifetime effect, Li and Xing 2011 n νs θ es 2 106 Ru 10 5 cm 3 10 6 10 Ton

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei ν s capture by radioactive nuclei N has no threshold ν s + N N + e Capture of ν s on radioactive nuclei produce mono-energetic electron well beyond the end point of beta decay spectrum Signal is clear E e = Q β + m νs

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei 180 160 s capture in spectrum N(p) (arbitrary unit) 140 120 100 80 60 decay spectrum 40 s DM capture 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 E(keV) ν s capture events are well separated from β decay events and are clear.

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei ν s number density is enhanced by its small mass Taking the estimate of the galactic value of ρ dm in the solar system n νs = 10 5 cm 3 ρ νs 3 kev 0.3 GeV cm 3 m νs Although the cross section is suppressed by θ es 2 the event rate is enhanced by the large n νs and hence the flux of ν s.

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei Background: solar pp ν(< 10 kev) can be captured by radioactive nuclei. The flux of solar pp ν(< 10keV) has flux 10 8 cm 2 s 1. Capture of solar pp ν with energy < 10keV: 4.0 10 3 year 1 8.5 10 2 year 1 for 10 kg 3 H for 10 Ton 106 Ru This type of background can be safely neglected.

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei This way to detect kev scale ν s DM looks similar to detecting cosmic relic neutrinos in the universe. A major difference is that events of capture of kev scale ν s are well separated from the β decay spectrum: E = Q β + m νs Detecting kev scale ν s using β decay nuclei is possible. On the other hand Cosmological constraint gives: m νe < 0.2 0.3 ev Energy resolution can not reach that high precision in modern technology Events of cosmic relic neutrinos can not be distinguished from β decay events Detecting cosmic relic neutrinos in this type of measurement seems not possible in the near future.

Detection of ν s DM: capture by radioactive nuclei Better radioactive nuclei(beta or anti-beta decay) may exist. Conditions of candidates for radioactive nuclei: enough life time large enough capture cross section significant production in reactor or available in nature better to have large decay energy to avoid pollution of other radioactive sources Or other ways to detect ν s DM?

Detection of ν s DM: other proposals In JCAP 1108 (2011) 006, Li and Xing suggest to capture ν s DM using EC-decaying nuclei 163 Ho + e 163 Dy i + ν e 163 Dy + E i + ν e The capture of ν s gives ν s + 163 Ho + e 163 Dy i 163 Dy + E i 600 Ton 163 Ho is required to have one event per year for θ es 2 10 6. This is very difficult.

Detection of ν s DM: other proposals To have a better measurement of ν s, it was suggested to make a complete measurement of kinetic information, i.e. also to measure the recoil momenta of initial and final nuclei (F. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, 2007). Momenta of recoil nuclei can be measured using time-of-flight measurement The experimental setup should be put in low temperature environment. ν s mass can be calculated on event by event basis However it s very hard to get large amount of cold atoms and high statistics for this type of measurement

Detection of ν s DM: other proposals Some other ways to detect ν s in laboratory include detection of electron recoil(ando and Kusenko, 2010) detection of spin flip of nuclei(ando and Kusenko, 2010) They are all very difficult Up to now capture ν s using β decay nuclei such as 3 H and 106 Ru is the best way to do direct laboratory search of kev scale ν s DM in the universe.

Summary kev scale ν s is a well motivated dark matter candidate and is very interesting ν s dark matter can be produced in the early universe through mixing with active neutrinos or through other mechanism ν s ν l mixing θ ls 2 can reach 10 6 (for 2 kev), the bound from X-ray observation Other astronomical and cosmological constraints can be satisfied

Summary At the moment there are two possible schemes to measure ν s DM in β decay experiment. 1. ν s dark matter can be measured in its mixture to the β decay, the resulting disappearance of β decay events. This measurement of ν s is a direct way to measure ν s is not a direct detection of ν s DM in the universe does not require large target mass of detector can be done using 3 H and 187 Re in current β decay experiment

Summary 2. I pointed out that direct laboratory search of ν s dark matter can be done using capture by radioactive nuclei. This is a new way to detect DM in the universe. Capture of ν s give mono-energetic electron well beyond the end point of the beta decay spectrum; signal very clear For θ es 2 10 6 a few to tens events per year available for 10kg Tritium or 10 Ton 106 Ru It requires reasonably large target mass It can be done using 3 H and 106 Ru Up to now this is the best way to do direct laboratory search of kev scale ν s DM in the universe.

Summary Two types of measurements can be done in one β decay experiment, or in different phases of one experiment. β decay experiment, as a particle physics experiment in high precision frontier, can also serve for frontier research of cosmology and become a multi-purpose experiment. Possible to detect kev scale ν s dark matter in β decay experiment

Thank you