CHAPTER 3: TANGENT SPACE

Similar documents
CHAPTER 2: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Introduction In this chapter we introduce smooth maps between manifolds, and some important

CHAPTER 5 TANGENT VECTORS

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURES 9-10,

ε i (E j )=δj i = 0, if i j, form a basis for V, called the dual basis to (E i ). Therefore, dim V =dim V.

Math 751 Lecture Notes Week 3

LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES

Elementary Analysis in Q p

Lecture 8: The First Fundamental Form Table of contents

Sums of independent random variables

Combinatorics of topmost discs of multi-peg Tower of Hanoi problem

0.1 Practical Guide - Surface Integrals. C (0,0,c) A (0,b,0) A (a,0,0)

SECTION 5: FIBRATIONS AND HOMOTOPY FIBERS

GENERICITY OF INFINITE-ORDER ELEMENTS IN HYPERBOLIC GROUPS

On Isoperimetric Functions of Probability Measures Having Log-Concave Densities with Respect to the Standard Normal Law

Multiplicative group law on the folium of Descartes

Uniform Law on the Unit Sphere of a Banach Space

Advanced Calculus I. Part A, for both Section 200 and Section 501

LECTURE 10: THE PARALLEL TRANSPORT

A QUATERNIONIC APPROACH to GEOMETRY of CURVES on SPACES of CONSTANT CURVATURE

Coordinate Systems. S. F. Ellermeyer. July 10, 2009

Mollifiers and its applications in L p (Ω) space

On a Markov Game with Incomplete Information

Theorems Geometry. Joshua Ruiter. April 8, 2018

(Workshop on Harmonic Analysis on symmetric spaces I.S.I. Bangalore : 9th July 2004) B.Sury

CR extensions with a classical Several Complex Variables point of view. August Peter Brådalen Sonne Master s Thesis, Spring 2018

ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY MASTERMATH (FALL 2014) Written exam, 21/01/2015, 3 hours Outline of solutions

Curves I: Curvature and Torsion. Table of contents

MATH 361: NUMBER THEORY ELEVENTH LECTURE

Chapter 6. Phillip Hall - Room 537, Huxley

Potential Theory JWR. Monday September 17, 2001, 5:00 PM

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.)

SECTION 12: HOMOTOPY EXTENSION AND LIFTING PROPERTY

TRACES OF SCHUR AND KRONECKER PRODUCTS FOR BLOCK MATRICES

B8.1 Martingales Through Measure Theory. Concept of independence

Numerical Linear Algebra

Andrea Mantile. Fractional Integral Equations and Applications to Point Interaction Models in Quantum Mechanics TESI DI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA

Warped Products. by Peter Petersen. We shall de ne as few concepts as possible. A tangent vector always has the local coordinate expansion

HARMONIC EXTENSION ON NETWORKS

Lecture 1.2 Pose in 2D and 3D. Thomas Opsahl

SYMPLECTIC STRUCTURES: AT THE INTERFACE OF ANALYSIS, GEOMETRY, AND TOPOLOGY

Lecture 10: Hypercontractivity

Chapter -1: Di erential Calculus and Regular Surfaces

(IV.D) PELL S EQUATION AND RELATED PROBLEMS

1 Gambler s Ruin Problem

Math Advanced Calculus II

General Linear Model Introduction, Classes of Linear models and Estimation

CMSC 425: Lecture 4 Geometry and Geometric Programming

San Francisco State University ECON 851 Summer Problem Set 1

Minimal Surfaces in R 3

Computing the covariance of two Brownian area integrals

Math 701: Secant Method

ANALYTIC NUMBER THEORY AND DIRICHLET S THEOREM

CSE 599d - Quantum Computing When Quantum Computers Fall Apart

Additive results for the generalized Drazin inverse in a Banach algebra

MATH 6210: SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM SET #3

Elements of Asymptotic Theory. James L. Powell Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley

On Z p -norms of random vectors

Surfaces of Revolution with Constant Mean Curvature in Hyperbolic 3-Space

Fibration of Toposes PSSL 101, Leeds

Sheaves on Subanalytic Sites

Elementary theory of L p spaces

Math 1270 Honors Fall, 2008 Background Material on Uniform Convergence

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24

Introduction to Poincare Conjecture and the Hamilton-Perelman program

Stochastic integration II: the Itô integral

Dependence on Initial Conditions of Attainable Sets of Control Systems with p-integrable Controls

Arc spaces and some adjacency problems of plane curves.

Sharp gradient estimate and spectral rigidity for p-laplacian

Hölder s and Minkowski s Inequality

CSC165H, Mathematical expression and reasoning for computer science week 12

A review of the foundations of perfectoid spaces

Approximating min-max k-clustering

2. Review of Calculus Notation. C(X) all functions continuous on the set X. C[a, b] all functions continuous on the interval [a, b].

On the Rank of the Elliptic Curve y 2 = x(x p)(x 2)

Stone Duality for Skew Boolean Algebras with Intersections

8.7 Associated and Non-associated Flow Rules

Chapter 9 Global Nonlinear Techniques

Analytic number theory and quadratic reciprocity

t s (p). An Introduction

arxiv:math/ v4 [math.gn] 25 Nov 2006

Feedback-error control

LEIBNIZ SEMINORMS IN PROBABILITY SPACES

Principal Components Analysis and Unsupervised Hebbian Learning

MTH 3102 Complex Variables Practice Exam 1 Feb. 10, 2017

Weil s Conjecture on Tamagawa Numbers (Lecture 1)

Solution sheet ξi ξ < ξ i+1 0 otherwise ξ ξ i N i,p 1 (ξ) + where 0 0

Various Proofs for the Decrease Monotonicity of the Schatten s Power Norm, Various Families of R n Norms and Some Open Problems

LECTURE 5: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Smooth Maps

MA202 Calculus III Fall, 2009 Laboratory Exploration 3: Vector Fields Solution Key

Homework Solution 4 for APPM4/5560 Markov Processes

Quaternionic Projective Space (Lecture 34)

Topic 7: Using identity types

Best approximation by linear combinations of characteristic functions of half-spaces

An Overview of Witt Vectors

Matching Transversal Edge Domination in Graphs

NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION WITH CONVEX CONSTRAINTS. The Goldstein-Levitin-Polyak algorithm

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M.

GOOD MODELS FOR CUBIC SURFACES. 1. Introduction

ON THE NORM OF AN IDEMPOTENT SCHUR MULTIPLIER ON THE SCHATTEN CLASS

MAZUR S CONSTRUCTION OF THE KUBOTA LEPOLDT p-adic L-FUNCTION. n s = p. (1 p s ) 1.

Transcription:

CHAPTER 3: TANGENT SPACE DAVID GLICKENSTEIN 1. Tangent sace We shall de ne the tangent sace in several ways. We rst try gluing them together. We know vectors in a Euclidean sace require a baseoint x 2 U R n and a vector v 2 R n : A C 1 -manifold consists of a number of ieces of R n glued together via coordinate charts, so we can de ne all tangents as follows. Consider what haens during a change of arametrization : V U: It will take a vector v to d (v) : This motivates the following: De nition 1. T glue M = (U i R n ) = where for (x; v) 2 U i R n ; (y; w) 2 U j i R n we have (x; v) (y; w) if and only i y = j 1 i (x) and w = d j 1 i (v) : x The nice thing about this de nition is it uts things together and gives the vectors in a good way. We de ne the tangent sace at a oint 2 M as T glue M = f[; v] : v 2 R n g : It is easy to see that T glue M is an n-dimensional vector sace. It is also easy to see that there is a ma : T glue M M de ned by ([; v]) = (since the arts of M are really equivalence classes modulo equivalence. It also makes it clear that T glue M is a C 1 manifold. We can de ne tangent saces in two other ways. De nition 2. T ath M = faths : ( "; ") M such that () = g = where if ( i ) () = ( i ) () for every i such that 2 U i : T ath M = T ath M: 2M This is a more geometric de nition. Note that there is a ma : T ath M M de ned by () = () : We shall show that T ath M and T glue M are equivalent. The mas are de ned by The inverse ma is : T ath M T glue M ([]) = i () ; ( i ) () : : T glue M T ath M de ned by ([ i () ; v]) = t 1 i ( i () + tv) : It is clear that if well de ned, they are inverses of each other. We need to show that and are well-de ned. Clearly is well de ned because i () = Date: Setember 29, 21. 1

2 DAVID GLICKENSTEIN i () ; ( i ) () = ( i ) () for any 2 [] : Also for any ( j () ; w) 2 [ i () ; v] must satisfy d i 1 j v = w: Notice that j() j 1 i ( i () + tv) () = d j 1 i v = w = ( i() j () + tw) () : The third way is in terms of germs of functions. equivalence class of functions. A germ of a function is an De nition 3. Germs is the set of functions f 2 C 1 (U f ) for 2 U f M modulo the equivalence that [f] = [g] i f (x) = g (x) for all x 2 U f \ U g : Note that Germs are an algebra since [f] + [g] = [f + g] is well-de ned, etc. De nition 4. A derivation of germs is an R-linear ma X :Germs R which satis es X (fg) = f () X (g) + X (f) g () : De nition 5. We de ne T der M to be the set of derivations of germs at : Proosition 6. Alternately, we may de ne the T der M to be the set of derivations of smooth functions at : Proof. Suose X : C 1 (M) R is a derivation at : Then it determines a derivation of germs in the obvious way. Conversely, suose [f] is a germ at : Then there is a reresentative f : U R, and within that oen set is a coordinate ball B centered at : Taking a smaller ball, we have a comact (closed) coordinate ball B around within the domain U of f: We can consider the function x b (x) f (x) ; where b is a smooth bum function suorted in U that is one on the ball B. These This de nition is nice because it shows how tangent vectors act on functions. We note derivations are a vector sace since (X + Y ) (fg) = X (f) g () + f () X (g) + Y (f) g () + f () Y (g) = (X + Y ) (f) g () + f () (X + Y ) (g) : A good examle of a germ on U R n is x since i x i (fg) = f g () g () + f () xi x i () : These are linearly indeendent since so X (1) = : Similarly, x x j = I j i i : We see that X (1) = 1 X (1) + X (1) 1 X x i i x j j = : So by Taylor series: f (x) = f () + f x i x i i + O jx j 2 :

TANGENT SPACE 3 We have formally that x san T der i U: To make this argument rigorous, we know that d f (x) = f () + f (tx + (1 t) ) dt dt f = f () + x i x i i dt: tx+(1 t) Hence if we aly a derivation X we have f X (f) = x i dt X x i i + X = f x i X x i i : f x i tx+(1 t) dt i i Hence for U R n we have a corresondence given by T der U R n X X x 1 1 ; : : : ; X (x n n ) which is an invertible linear ma with inverse R n T der U s 1 ; : : : ; s n X (f) = f x i s i : On a manifold, we de ne x i f = x i i() (f i ) for coordinates x 1 ; : : : ; x n = i () : Notice that under a change of coordinates from y 1 ; : : : ; y n = j () we have that x k = x k (f i ) i() = x k f j 1 i i j 1 i i() y` = x k (f j ) y` i() j() Also, we have the rojection : T der M M: x i form a basis for the deriva- Proosition 7. Let M = R n : The derivations tions at :

4 DAVID GLICKENSTEIN Proof. We rst see that X (c) = if c is a constant function. By linearity of the derivation, we need only show that X (1) = : We comute: X (1) = X (1 1) = 1 X (1) + X (1) 1 = 2X (1) : We conclude that X (1) = : Now, let X be a derivation and f a smooth function. We can write f as f (x) = f () + = f () + d f (tx + (1 dt f t) ) dt x i x i i dt: tx+(1 t) By linearity and the derivation roerty, we have f X (f) = X (f ()) + X x i x i i dt tx+(1 t) f = + x i dt X x i i + X t+(1 t) = f x i X x i i : f x i tx+(1 t) dt i i So, X x i i are just some numbers, and so we see that X is a linear combination of x ; meaning that these san the sace of derivations Since it is clear that i x and i x are linearly indeendent for each i 6= j (consider the functions j x i i ), the result follows. De nition 8. Given any smooth ma : M N; there is a ush forward : T M T () M given as follows: ath [] = [ ] der X f = X (f ) : De nition 9. In any coordinate neighborhood (U; ) of, we de ne the derivation by x k x k = 1 x k () We may now see that T der M is isomorhic to T ath M: The ma is [] f d dt f ( (t)) : t= We note that d dt f ( (t)) = f 1 i t= x j i() d ( i ) j dt

TANGENT SPACE 5 and hence it is well-de ned u to equivalence of aths. Note that 1 i ( + te k ) n k=1 form a basis for [] and ma to so this is a linear isometry. x k We will now use whichever de nition we wish. Also note the following: Proosition 1. If 2 U M is an oen set, then T M = T U: Therefore, we will not make a distinction. 2. Comutation in coordinates n Let s comute the ush-forward in coordinates. Recall that basis for T M: Now, suose that x k o m k=1 n y is a basis for T a () N: Given a () a=1 smooth ma : M N; we should be able to comute the ush forward in coordinates. If X 2 T M; we can write it in terms of the basis, X = X k x k for some numbers X k 2 R. To comute the ush forward, which is a linear ma, we have that X = X k x k : irst, let s suose M = R m and N = R n : To comute we need to comute x k f = x k (f ) = f y a y a () x k (note the summation) where, in the second exression, we really mean y a x k = ya ( (x)) x k = a x k is a x k ; for f 2 C 1 (N) if = 1 ; : : : ; n is written in y-coordinates. Notice that once we have seci ed the coordinates, we have an exression for in terms of the di erential. Now suose we are on a manifold, then x k = 1 1 x k : The middle ma is known to us, as it is the di erential of a ma between R m and R n ; that is 1 = ^ a ( ()) xk k=1;:::;m a=1;:::;n

6 DAVID GLICKENSTEIN where ^ = 1 : In articular, we get x k = ^ a ( ()) xk y a () One can also consider change of coordinates. If (U; ) and (V; ) are coordinate charts with coordinates x i and ~x i ; then any tangent vector can be written as X = X i x i = X ~ i ~x i : How are X i and X ~ i related? We can comute: ~X i ~x i = X ~ i 1 ~x i () = X ~ i 1 1 ~x i () = X ~ i 1 1 ~x i () " = X ~ i 1 1 k ~x i ( ()) x k and so = ~ X i 1 k ~x i X k = ~ X i 1 k ( ()) x k ~x i ( ()) : () Examle 1. Calculate the di erential of the ma : C 2 n f(; )g CP 1. #