The Interaction Velocity of the Electric Force

Similar documents
Corrections to Maxwell s equations for free space Invalidating the theory of relativity?!

2.1 The Ether and the Michelson-Morley Experiment

I will make this assumption for my starting point. I substitute the appropriate values into the second form of the force equation given above:

APPLIED OPTICS. Lecture-1: EVOLUTION of our UNDERSTANDING of LIGHT. Is it a stream of particles?

ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES WHAT IS LIGHT?

Maxwell s equations and EM waves. From previous Lecture Time dependent fields and Faraday s Law

Non-Propagation Action At A Distance

Physics for Scientists & Engineers 2

AQA Physics A-level Section 12: Turning Points in Physics

Semiconductor Physics and Devices

Henok Tadesse, Electrical engineer, BSc., Debrezeit, Ethiopia Mobile: or

General Physics I. Lecture 16: The Principles of the Theory of Relativity. Prof. WAN, Xin 万歆.


Homework 2: Forces on Charged Particles

Chapter-1 Relativity Part I RADIATION

RELATIVITY Basis of a Theory of Relativity

4. Energy, Power, and Photons

Oscillatory Motion and Wave Motion

Chapter 15. Mechanical Waves

Electromagnetic Waves

Interference it s importance not only in surveying

Galilean velocity transformation

THEORETICAL COMPETITION. 1A. SPRING CYLINDER WITH MASSIVE PISTON (5 points)

Relativity. An explanation of Brownian motion in terms of atoms. An explanation of the photoelectric effect ==> Quantum Theory

Special Theory of Relativity. PH101 Lec-2

ELECTROSTATIC FIELDS

Chapter 31 Maxwell s Equations and Electromagnetic Waves. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 34. Electromagnetic Waves

tip conducting surface

Physics Important Terms and their Definitions

The Franck-Hertz Experiment Physics 2150 Experiment No. 9 University of Colorado

Rotational Mechanics and Relativity --- Summary sheet 1

MARKING SCHEME SET 55/B (Compartment) Q. No. Expected Answer / Value Points Marks Total Marks. Section A Q1 1 Q3 1

Chapter 10: Wave Properties of Particles

PHYS 3313 Section 001. Lecture #3

Gravitational Effects on Light Propagation. Copyright 2009 Joseph A. Rybczyk

General Physics (PHY 2140)

Lecture PowerPoints. Chapter 27 Physics: Principles with Applications, 7th edition Giancoli

Rethinking the Principles of Relativity. Copyright 2010 Joseph A. Rybczyk

Chapter 31 Maxwell s Equations and Electromagnetic Waves. Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Einstein for Everyone Lecture 2: Background to Special Relativity

Physics Common Assessment Unit 5-8 3rd Nine Weeks

Lecture 38: FRI 24 APR Ch.33 Electromagnetic Waves

Chapter 9: Quantization of Light

Science Curriculum Matrix

Waves Part 3: Superposition

Antenna Theory (Engineering 9816) Course Notes. Winter 2016

Waves Part 3B: Interference

Chapter 16 Mechanical Waves

Intrinsic Absolute Motion Paradigm and Apparent Source Theory- Distinction Between Translational and Rotational Motions

LIGHT and SPECIAL RELATIVITY FRAMES OF REFERENCE

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Level

Chemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 2. Chem 4631

Postulate 2: Light propagates through empty space with a definite speed (c) independent of the speed of the source or of the observer.

Class 15 : Electromagnetic Waves

Engage Education Foundation

Ratio of Charge to Mass (e/m) for the Electron

Arvind Borde / PHY 12, Week 7: Electromagnetic Radiation

Part 2: Quantum* Mechanics

PHYA5/2D. General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination June Unit 5D Turning Points in Physics Section B

Test Review FQ3eso_U5_4_Electric field_test_review

PHYS 1444 Section 004 Lecture #22

High School Curriculum Standards: Physics

UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS General Certificate of Education Advanced Level

PHYS 1444 Section 003 Lecture #23

CHAPTER 9 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES

MUDRA PHYSICAL SCIENCES

MCQs E M WAVES. Physics Without Fear.

Chapter 5. Past and Proposed Experiments Detecting Absolute Motion

Lecture Sound Waves EM Waves. Physics Help Q&A: tutor.leiacademy.org. The Doppler Effect 11/11/2014

Science Online Instructional Materials Correlation to the 2010 Physics Standards of Learning and Curriculum Framework

Prentice Hall. Physics: Principles with Applications, Updated 6th Edition (Giancoli) High School

The ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD

New theory of light and ether

NYS STANDARD/KEY IDEA/PERFORMANCE INDICATOR 5.1 a-e. 5.1a Measured quantities can be classified as either vector or scalar.

Physics 007: sample midterm #2 (spring 2010)

Nuclear Fusion and Radiation

B.Tech. First Semester Examination Physics-1 (PHY-101F)

Einstein for Everyone Lecture 3: Special Relativity

Aristotle: If a man on top of a mast in a moving ship drops an object, it would fall toward the back of the ship.

Greek Philosophers (cont.)

ECE 107: Electromagnetism

CHAPTER 3 The Experimental Basis of Quantum Theory

PMT. Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Level

Intrinsic Absolute Motion Paradigm and Apparent Source Theory- Distinction Between Translational and Rotational Motions

Light and Relativity

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Sept 29. Vivek Sharma UCSD Physics

We also find the development of famous Schrodinger equation to describe the quantization of energy levels of atoms.

Physics 2D Lecture Slides Lecture 2. March 31, 2009

Physics 205 Modern Physics for Engineers

INTERFERENCE 1.1 NATURE OF LIGHT

ELG4112. Electromechanical Systems and Mechatronics

CHARGED PARTICLES IN FIELDS

Particles and Waves Particles Waves

Chapter 29. Magnetic Fields

Classical electromagnetism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Nature of Light. Early Greece to 20 th Century

Maxwell s Sea of Molecular Vortices

Mass on a Horizontal Spring

Revision Guide. Chapter 7 Quantum Behaviour

Transcription:

The Interaction Velocity of the Electric Force Dr. Rainer F. Huck I. Background In the first part of the nineteenth century, when interest and experimental work in electrical and magnetic effects was rapidly expanding, much effort was directed toward an understanding of the mechanism whereby electric charges and permanent and electric magnets were able to exert forces on one another through empty space. A closely related issue was the question of the velocity of this interaction; was it finite or was it infinite? It appeared that a theoretical solution to this question was arrived at by J. C. Maxwell when he discovered that the traveling wave solution of the set of electric and magnetic field equations, commonly known as Maxwell s equations, appeared to propagate at a velocity determined by the permittivity and permeability of free space and which was found to be very nearly equal to the velocity of light. At that time it was still widely believed that light waves were propagated through an ether that pervaded all of space and Maxwell concluded not only that his newly discovered electromagnetic waves also propagated through the same ether, but that light also was of an electromagnetic nature. When Hertz produced in the laboratory the waves predicted theoretically by Maxwell and demonstrated that they had many of the same properties of light, the unification of the two phenomena was essentially complete, although they were still believed to be transmitted through an all pervasive ether. This assumption was undermined by the negative result of the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887 and was generally abandoned with the acceptance of the Special Theory of Relativity, published by Albert Einstein in 1905. The cumulative result of these discoveries and inventions was the conclusion that varying or moving electric charges radiate energy in the form of electromagnetic waves which propagate through space at a maximum velocity c, the velocity of light. As to the validity of this conclusion, there can, of course, be no debate. It has been proven time and time again and countless practical devices have been constructed in accordance with the principles derived therefrom. An important question has been left unanswered and it is to this question that this paper is addressed. The basic law of electrostatics is known as Coulomb s Law and may be written in the following form: F =k q 1 q 2 r 2 This law, which forms the basis of the electrostatic system of units (ESU) and is essentially identical in form to Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation, states that the force between two charges is proportional to the product of their magnitudes and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Being defined as a law of electrostatics it is strictly valid only in the case where the two charges are at relative rest and are not varying in magnitude as a function of time. This does not, however, necessarily preclude its applicability in the time varying case and we shall now inquire into the nature of the force exerted on q 2 if q 1 is perturbed, either in magnitude or in position with respect to q 2. It is immediately obvious that q 1 will radiate electromagnetic waves, some of whose characteristics will depend on the type of perturbation and which will spread radially outward at the velocity of light. After Reciprocity 9 3 page 3 Copyright 1979 by ISUS, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 13

2 The Interaction Velocity of the Electric Force a period of time, determined by the distance between q 1 and q 2, has elapsed, the electromagnetic waves will interact with q 2, producing a perturbation thereof. A question now presents itself: is the nature of the force that exists between the unvarying and fixed charges similar to that of the transient force exerted by the passing wave front initiated by the variation or the translation of one of the charges? Contemporary science has regarded the two as being one in the same, which, I submit, is an assumption that has been accepted on the basis of collateral and possibly unrelated evidence and for which no direct proof exists at all. In the general case, and on the basis of the lack of reliable experimental evidence currently available, one must not rule out the possibility that if an impulse either in magnitude or displacement is applied to charge q 1, that two impulses will be detected by charge q 2, one resulting from the electromagnetic disturbance and another resulting from the purely electric force disturbance. Let us examine the consequences derived from Coulomb s law if we do not make the common assumption that all time varying electric charges give rise to only electromagnetic effects. Let q 1 be restrained from motion and be allowed to vary sinusoidally in intensity such that q 1 (t)=q 0 cos(ω t) where ω is the frequency in radians per second. Substituting this into Coulomb s law: F =k q 0 q 2 r 2 cos(ω t) Equating with Newton s Second Law, where m is the mass of charge q 2 Integrating with respect to t: m dv dt =k q 0 q 2 r 2 cos(ω t ) mdv(t )= ( k q q 0 2 cos(ω r t)) dt 2 m v(t)=k q 0q 2 sin (ωt) r 2 ω Integrating again with respect to t to obtain x(t) x(t)= v(t)dt= ( k q q 0 2cos(ω t) ω 2 r 2 m ) This result indicates that the displacement of q 2 about its equilibrium point varies in phase with the disturbance q 1 (t) and that this phase relationship is not a function of the distance r separating them, as would be the case if this were a traveling wave phenomenon. On this basis, we would expect that an impulse applied to q 1 would result in two impulses received by q 2 whose separation in time is proportional to the distance between them. The specific purpose of the experiment described herein will be to determine whether or not these impulses arrive at q 2 simultaneously or whether they are separated by some time interval. A search of the literature has revealed that an experiment of this type has not yet been performed, in spite of its most fundamental nature. The data generated by this experiment will be of importance, irrespective of what the specific result turns out to be. If the test reveals that the pulses arrive at q 2 simultaneously, it will remove the unfounded assumption described previously and place the current theoretical paradigm

The Interaction Velocity of the Electric Force 3 Photons EM Wave Antenna EM Wave Detector Transmitter EM Wave Detector E field E Wave Antenna d -Δd +Δd Comparator Figure 1: Experimental Apparatus for the Determination of t=(t em t E ) { =0 0 on a sounder footing. If, on the other hand, the pulses arrive at distinct times, whose separation is a function of the intervening distance, then this experiment could provide a basis for an entirely new type of communications system whose characteristics may be markedly different from those currently in use. II. Experimental Proposal The proposed experiment will initially be geared to determine whether Δ t=t em t E is either zero or non-zero only, rather than attempting to determine the magnitude of Δ t, should it be non-zero. This is done so as to enable not only a lower cost experimental apparatus, but also to reduce the amount of time required to obtain the result. The apparatus consists of a single transmitter with antennas designed to maximize both the electromagnetic wave transmission and the electric force transmission. In addition, there are two separate receivers, one of which can be a common, electromagnetism wave

4 The Interaction Velocity of the Electric Force receiver tuned to the frequency of the transmitter and the second, a special type, designed so as to be sensitive to the Colombic force exerted by a varying charge; and is insensitive as possible to the electromagnetic radiation, which is also emitted. These receivers will be located some distance d from the transmitter and their outputs observed in the form of a sinusoidal wave shape on the display of a dual-trace oscilloscope. After these waveforms have been set in some reference position, the separation between the transmitter and receivers will be increased or decreased and any phase shift from the reference position noted. If the two impulses travel at the same velocity then we should expect no relative phase shift of the waveforms as the transmitter is moved. In the alternative, if the transmission rates differ then we would expect to see a phase shift. Thus, it is seen that whatever the results of a properly done experiment of this type are, an important question will be answered (see Figure 1). +V +V R 1 R Electron Gun 2 e - III. A e - e - 1 A 2 The Electric Force Detector Figure 2: Electron Gun A new type of detector must be developed such that it will provide a maximum response to a changing electric field and a minimum response to an electromagnetic field, here are undoubtedly many conceivable designs to accomplish this end, but the one described below has been selected from the many possibilities considered as being one which offers a high degree of potential suitability. Its sensitivity and noise rejection are enhanced by operating in the differential mode and the fact that it offers its greatest sensitivity to the electric disturbances along the longitudinal axis provides substantial rejection of any electromagnetic contamination of the signal. The tube uses a standard cathode ray gun as a source of charged electrons in a beam. This beam is split into two components which travel in opposite directions towards two anodes, A 1 and A 2. In operation, the beam is balanced so that the current flow, and thus the potential present at each of these anodes is equal. When an external electric charge is present along the longitudinal axis of the tube, the effect will be to unbalance the electron beams causing a differential voltage to appear across the two anodes. Preliminary calculations indicate that a charge of 10-10 coulombs at a distance of 10m from the tube will give rise to a differential voltage of approximately 1.6mv, a signal easily retrievable and processable by rather unsophisticated equipment. (See Figure 2) IV.Progress to Date The apparatus assembled to date consists of the tube described above, a power supply capable of presenting variable voltages to the various elements of the detector tube and signal processing devices

The Interaction Velocity of the Electric Force 5 to provide sufficient gain and noise rejection to present a suitable signal to the oscilloscope display. Satisfactory operation of this system has not yet been obtained and the probable cause has been traced to excessive return of electrons to the accelerator anode of the cathode ray gun through elastic collisions at the intersection at the longitudinal arm of the tube. It is anticipated that one or more generations of modification of the tube must be made in order to ensure satisfactory operation. See Figure 3. V. Conclusion It should be reemphasized that this experiment is designed to test an aspect of electric theory that has not yet been subject to proper experimental verification and that the results of this work will be valuable to the scientific community independently of the assumptions that they support. Furthermore, if it should turn out that the pulses arrive at distinct times, there will be some substantial theoretical and practical ramifications. The theoretical consequences will undoubtedly be dominated by a long overdue reevaluation of the significance of the Special Theory of Relativity and its eventual removal from the center stage of scientific dogma. This will create a suitable atmosphere for the consideration and examination of new and more fruitful ideas by the majority of the scientific community. In the way of practical applications, a two pulse experimental result could open the way to the development of a new communications system that might permit the establishment of contact with distant places without the annoying time delay resulting from the finite velocity of light. A great deal of effort is currently being expended in an attempt to detect electromagnetic signals from hopefully intelligent extraterrestrial beings. To date these attempts have resulted in repeated disappointment. Rather than indicating that there are no intelligent beings out there sending signals, these failures might be suggesting that we are not looking at the right kind of transmission mode.

6 The Interaction Velocity of the Electric Force Tube Power Supply 20 db/decade attenuator Breakpoint = 100 khz Vacuum Tube Differential Amplifier K = 100 I.C. Diff. Amp K = 1 4Ddb/decade Attenuator Breakpoint = 30 khz I.C. Amp K = 250 Output to Comparator Figure 3: E Field Detector Tube and Associated Systems