Orthogonal Complex Structures and Twistor Surfaces

Similar documents
Kähler configurations of points

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

Stable bundles on CP 3 and special holonomies

1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties

HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS

The Moduli Space of Branched Superminimal Surfaces of a Fixed Degree, Genus and Conformal Structure in the Four-sphere

Minimal surfaces in quaternionic symmetric spaces

arxiv: v1 [math.sg] 6 Nov 2015

TWISTOR AND KILLING FORMS IN RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

η = (e 1 (e 2 φ)) # = e 3

Geometry of moduli spaces

The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Eberly College of Science AN ASYMPTOTIC MUKAI MODEL OF M 6

Stratification of 3 3 Matrices

LECTURE 2: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR BUNDLES

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday January 20, 2015 (Day 1)

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

Minimal submanifolds: old and new

Hermitian vs. Riemannian Geometry

On complete degenerations of surfaces with ordinary singularities in

1. Plurisubharmonic functions and currents The first part of the homework studies some properties of PSH functions.

Linear connections on Lie groups

LECTURE 1: LINEAR SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY

H-projective structures and their applications

Geometric Structures in Mathematical Physics Non-existence of almost complex structures on quaternion-kähler manifolds of positive type

Manifolds with holonomy. Sp(n)Sp(1) SC in SHGAP Simon Salamon Stony Brook, 9 Sep 2016

TWISTORS AND THE OCTONIONS Penrose 80. Nigel Hitchin. Oxford July 21st 2011

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5

The Strominger Yau Zaslow conjecture

Part II. Geometry and Groups. Year

Reductive group actions and some problems concerning their quotients

Some new torsional local models for heterotic strings

Torus actions and Ricci-flat metrics

Simon Salamon. Turin, 24 April 2004

Algebraic geometry over quaternions

Classifying complex surfaces and symplectic 4-manifolds

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

ORAL QUALIFYING EXAM QUESTIONS. 1. Algebra

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15

6 Orthogonal groups. O 2m 1 q. q 2i 1 q 2i. 1 i 1. 1 q 2i 2. O 2m q. q m m 1. 1 q 2i 1 i 1. 1 q 2i. i 1. 2 q 1 q i 1 q i 1. m 1.

where m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism

Let us recall in a nutshell the definition of some important algebraic structure, increasingly more refined than that of group.

The geography of irregular surfaces

Projective parabolic geometries

Gauss composition and integral arithmetic invariant theory

The Elements of Twistor Theory

Quaternionic Complexes

Large automorphism groups of 16-dimensional planes are Lie groups

NATIONAL BOARD FOR HIGHER MATHEMATICS. M. A. and M.Sc. Scholarship Test. September 24, Time Allowed: 150 Minutes Maximum Marks: 30

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

Projective space and twistor theory

Quasi-conformal maps and Beltrami equation

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY AND THE QUATERNIONS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) The Chern Lectures Berkeley April 9th-18th 2013

Algebra Workshops 10 and 11

Special cubic fourfolds

The Spinor Representation

Poisson modules and generalized geometry

Complex Analysis Math 185A, Winter 2010 Final: Solutions

Bubble Tree Convergence for the Harmonic Sequence of Harmonic Surfaces in CP n

Lagrangian knottedness and unknottedness in rational surfaces

Geometry and combinatorics of spherical varieties.

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

Hypertoric varieties and hyperplane arrangements

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

Geometry of Conformal Field Theory

Nodal symplectic spheres in CP 2 with positive self intersection

SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 1

VARIATIONS ON THE BAER SUZUKI THEOREM. 1. Introduction

612 CLASS LECTURE: HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY

Hard Lefschetz Theorem for Vaisman manifolds

Introduction to Teichmüller Spaces

QUALIFYING EXAMINATION Harvard University Department of Mathematics Tuesday August 31, 2010 (Day 1)

Definition We say that a topological manifold X is C p if there is an atlas such that the transition functions are C p.

Morse theory and stable pairs

CLASSICAL GROUPS DAVID VOGAN

K3 Surfaces and Lattice Theory

NPTEL web course on Complex Analysis. A. Swaminathan I.I.T. Roorkee, India. and. V.K. Katiyar I.I.T. Roorkee, India

Holonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012

MONODROMY OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS AND SURFACE POTENTIALS

Knot Contact Homology, Chern-Simons Theory, and Topological Strings

Smooth Structure. lies on the boundary, then it is determined up to the identifications it 1 2

How curvature shapes space

Ancient solutions to Ricci flow

Lecture VI: Projective varieties

Riemannian Curvature Functionals: Lecture III

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

Conformal Mapping, Möbius Transformations. Slides-13

CONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP

LECTURE 5: SURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SPACE. 1. Projective space

Deforming conformal metrics with negative Bakry-Émery Ricci Tensor on manifolds with boundary

Contact and Symplectic Geometry of Monge-Ampère Equations: Introduction and Examples

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Spring 2018 CIS 610. Advanced Geometric Methods in Computer Science Jean Gallier Homework 3

Riemannian geometry of the twistor space of a symplectic manifold

SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS

Mirror Symmetry: Introduction to the B Model

Compact Riemannian manifolds with exceptional holonomy

Intermediate Jacobians and Abel-Jacobi Maps

Representation Theory

Transcription:

Orthogonal Complex Structures and Twistor Surfaces Simon Salamon joint work with Jeff Viaclovsky arxiv:0704.3422 Bayreuth, May 2007

Definitions and examples Let Ω be an open set of R 4. An OCS on an open set Ω R 4 is a (C 1 ) map J: Ω {M SO(4) : M 2 = I} = CP 1 satisfying Nij(J) 0. J 0 is defined on R 4 = C 2 by fixing complex coordinates z 1, z 2. J 1 is defined on R 4 \ {0} by applying to J 0 the map q 1/q where q = z 1 +jz 2 H. J 2 is defined on R 4 \ l = S 2 R + R = S 2 H 2, a domain with a conformally-flat complete Kähler metric (Pontecorvo 1992).

Liouville theorems Let J be an OCS on an open set Ω = R 4 \K. 1 If H 1 (K) = 0 (Hausdorff measure) then J is defined on R 4 or R 4 \ {p} and is at least conformal to J 0. 2 If K is a straight line or (equivalently) a round circle then J is conformal to J 0 or J 2. Theorem 1 was known, at least when K =. If J is defined on R 4 then it must be constant. Proofs will use the Penrose twistor space CP 3 fibring to S 4 = R 4 { }.

The language of deformations Start with J 0 and Λ 1,0 (J 0 ) = { dz1 dz 2. Define J by the isotropic family Λ 1,0 (J) = { dz1 adz 2 dz 2 + adz 1 = { dw1 dw 2 mod da, where W 1 = z 1 az 2 and W 2 = z 2 + az 1 and a = a(z 1, z 2 ) = a(w 1, W 2 ). Equivalently, J = P φ J 0 P 1, where φ = ( 0 a a 0 ) φ Γ(Θ Λ 0,1 ). The integrability condition is that a be a holomorphic function of W 1, W 2 ; explicitly a z 1 a a z 2 = 0 = a z 2 +a a z 1.

The language of quaternions Let W 1 = z 1 az 2 and W 2 = z 2 + az 1. A holomorphic function a : Ω C { } defines a surface { [1, a, W1, W 2 ] : z 1, z 2 C } CP 3 \ CP 1 π { [1+ja, W1 +jw 2 ] } HP 1 \ [0,1] (W 1 +jw 2 )(1+ja) 1 = z 1 +jz 2 The fibres CP 1 of π parametrize SO(4)/U(2). Conclusion. An OCS J on Ω R 4 can be regarded as a holomorphic section Ω CP 3, or rather a map Ω CP 3 whose differential is complex linear relative to the endomorphism J induced on Ω.

Liouville theorems revisited Let J be an OCS on an open set Ω = R 4 \K. 1 If H 1 (K) = 0 then J arises from some plane CP 2 CP 3. E.g. J 0 is defined by a=0, and J 1 by W 1 =0. Sketch proof: J(Ω) is analytic in CP 3 \π 1 (K). Key point is to deduce that J(Ω) is analytic, so algebraic of degree 1. 2 If K is a line or circle then J arises from a unique quadric in CP 3. E.g. J 2 is defined by W 2 = aw 1. Sketch proof: There exists a quadric Q such that π 1 (K) disconnects both J(Ω) and Q. If C is a remaining component of J(Ω), we deduce that C is analytic.

Removal of singularities Hausdorff measure is defined in terms of a cover by sets of increasingly small diameter. If E i R m, let r i = 1 2 diam(e i) and H d (K) = lim v d i = vol(bd (r i )) = (πr2 i )d/2 Γ( d 2 +1). inf δ 0 i=1 v d i : K i=1 E i, r i <δ Shiffman s Theorem (1968). U open in C n, E closed in U. If A 2k U \ E is analytic and H 2k 1 (E) = 0, then A U is analytic. Based on the proof of Bishop s Theorem (1964). U open in C n and B analytic in U. If A 2k U \ B is analytic and H 2k (A B) = 0 then A U is analytic. A generalization of Remmert-Stein (1953).

Classification of the discriminant locus Definition. Given a quadric Q CP 3 and a point q R 4, set D = D 0 D 1 where q D 0 π 1 (q) Q q D 1 π 1 (q) is 1 point. Theorem 3 There are three types of nondegenerate quadrics Q CP 3 S 4 : (0) Q is real (meaning invariant by j acting on C 4 = H 2 ) and D = D 0 = S 1. We get an OCS ±J on R 4 \ K where K = D. (1) D = D 1 = S 1 S 1 is a smooth unknotted torus in R 4. We get an OCS s J, J on R 4 \K where K = S 1 B 2 is a solid torus. (2) D is a torus pinched over two points q 1, q 2 and D 0 = {q 1, q 2 }. In both (0) and (1), π 1 (K) Q = S 1 S 2.

The real structure on CP 3 Is induced from multiplication by j: (1, W 1, a, W 2 ) ( a, W 2, 1, W 1 ) A matrix G C 4,4 belongs to gl(2, H) iff ( ) A B G = B A Then G SL(2, H) 2:1 SO o (5,1) if det G = 1. Definition. Let Q, Q C 4,4 be symmetric. Then Q Q if Q =λg QG for some λ C and G SL(2, H). The space of orbits has dimension 20 17=3. Any symmetric Q C 4,4 equals P 1 +ip 2 with P α gl(2, H). If rankq=4, then Q I+iP 3 with trp 3 = 0.

Conformal canonical form Given Q = I + ip 3, the stabilizer SO (4) = SL(2, H) O(4, C) of I is isomorphic to SL(2, R) Z2 SU(2) 2:1 SO(2, 1) SO(3). P 3 is determined by X R 3,3, and the space of orbits has dimension 9 6 = 3. We use SVD to diagonalize X and Q, and obtain Theorem 4 Under the action of the group SO 0 (5,1) on CP 3 S 4, any non-degenerate quadric is represented by the matrix e λ+iν 0 0 0 0 e µ iν 0 0 0 0 e λ+iν 0 0 0 0 e µ iν for some λ, µ, ν R.

A fundamental domain In view of equivalences such as ν π 2 ν, we may restrict to {(λ, µ, ν) : 0 λ µ, 0 ν < π 2 }. The origin 0 (0,0, π 2 ) represents the real quadric and J 2. The pinched case (2) arises from the open half line l = {(λ, λ,0) : λ > 0}. Quadrics lying on the face F = {(0, µ, ν)} required special attention.

The proof of Theorem 3 (i) It is straightforward to determine that D 0 = outside l, and #D 0 =2 if λ=µ > 0. (ii) Consider the discriminant =B 2 AC : R 4 R 2 ; then rank(grad )<2 only on l. (iii) Im is a smooth 3-sphere in R 4 if ν 0. (iv) We then use χ(d) = 2χ(S 2 ) χ(q) = 0 to prove that D has no S 2 components, and is in fact connected, at all interior points. (v) D is then a smooth torus except on l.

Example for case (1): (0,0, π 4 ) The quadratic form equals e iν (1 + a 2 ) + e iν 2 (W 1 + 2 W2 ) = Aa 2 + 2Ba + C. The discriminant = B 2 AC equals i i z 4 2 2 2 2 + z 1 +z1 +z2 +z2 in terms of z = (z 1, z 2 ) = (x,y). The zero set D of is given by Im : 1 = z 2 = x 2 + y 2 Re : 0 = x 2 y 2 So x = y = 2 1 and D = D 1 = S 1 S 1 is a smooth Clifford torus.

Example for case (2): (λ, λ,0) We can find G SL(2, H) such that G QG = 0 0 0 e λ 0 0 e λ 0 0 e λ 0 0 e λ 0 0 0 and Q has equation 2e λ W 2 2e λ aw 1 = 0 D = { = 0} is given by 2 z 1 2 + 4 z 2 2 = e 2λ z 1 2 + e 2λ z 1 2 Im : x 1 y 1 = 0 Re : 2(x 2 2 +y2 2 ) = (c 1)x1 2 If c=cosh λ > 1 then D is a cone with vertex at 0 (and S 3 ) and D 0 = {0, }.

Quartics in CP 3 S 4 The surface K c with equation 1 + a 4 + W 1 4 + W 2 4 + 6ca 2 = 0 is real and non-singular for c ± 1 3 Lemma K c contains no CP 1 fibres unless c = 1,0,1, in which cases it has 8. Generically, D(K c ) is given by 6ABC = 4B 3 2BA 2 and AB 2 = AB 2, where A = 1+z 1 4 +z 2 4, B = z 1 3 z 2 +z 2 3 z 1 and C = z 1 2 z 2 2 +z 2 2 z 1 2 +c. If c { 1,0,1}, consider E = K c /Z 2 and E \ π 1 (D) 2:1 S 4 \ D Then χ(d) = 8 and D must be singular.

Higher degrees in general What are the possible maximal domains of definition Ω = R 4 \ K for OCS s? Let S be an irreducible surface of CP 3 of degree d 2 with discriminant locus D. If p π 1 (D) S then rank(dπ p ) = 2 and it follows that dim H D 2. Theorem 5 S contains the graph of a singlevalued OCS J on S 4 \ K only if K D and S \ π 1 (K) is disconnected. Moreover, H 3 (K) 0 unless S is a real quadric. If d > 2, D 0 consists of finitely many points. If S is j-invariant then #D 0 d 2, though better estimates will be possible.