Addition of Center Points to a 2 k Designs Section 6-6 page 271

Similar documents
Design of Engineering Experiments Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorials

The 2 k Factorial Design. Dr. Mohammad Abuhaiba 1

Design and Analysis of

Design of Engineering Experiments Part 5 The 2 k Factorial Design

Design and Analysis of Multi-Factored Experiments

What If There Are More Than. Two Factor Levels?

Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs

Factorial designs. Experiments

Chapter 5 Introduction to Factorial Designs Solutions

Design & Analysis of Experiments 7E 2009 Montgomery

Third European DOE User Meeting, Luzern 2010

3.4. A computer ANOVA output is shown below. Fill in the blanks. You may give bounds on the P-value.

Contents. 2 2 factorial design 4

SMA 6304 / MIT / MIT Manufacturing Systems. Lecture 10: Data and Regression Analysis. Lecturer: Prof. Duane S. Boning

2.830 Homework #6. April 2, 2009

Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel Chapter 9 Two Sample Tests With Numerical Data

T.I.H.E. IT 233 Statistics and Probability: Sem. 1: 2013 ESTIMATION AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING OF TWO POPULATIONS

Process/product optimization using design of experiments and response surface methodology

CHAPTER 6 A STUDY ON DISC BRAKE SQUEAL USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS

PSY 307 Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Chapter 20 Tests for Ranked Data, Choosing Statistical Tests

DESAIN EKSPERIMEN Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) Semester Genap 2017/2018 Jurusan Teknik Industri Universitas Brawijaya

MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS FINAL EXAM - STATISTICS FALL 1999

PLSC PRACTICE TEST ONE

Difference in two or more average scores in different groups

Table 1: Fish Biomass data set on 26 streams

2015 Stat-Ease, Inc. Practical Strategies for Model Verification

Note: k = the # of conditions n = # of data points in a condition N = total # of data points

Chapter 4: Randomized Blocks and Latin Squares

Orthogonal contrasts for a 2x2 factorial design Example p130

CHAPTER 4 Analysis of Variance. One-way ANOVA Two-way ANOVA i) Two way ANOVA without replication ii) Two way ANOVA with replication

A discussion on multiple regression models

Lecture 10. Factorial experiments (2-way ANOVA etc)

Analysis of Variance. Read Chapter 14 and Sections to review one-way ANOVA.

Correlation and Simple Linear Regression

Chapter 9 Other Topics on Factorial and Fractional Factorial Designs

Analysis of Variance: Part 1

Two-Way ANOVA. Chapter 15

PLS205 Lab 2 January 15, Laboratory Topic 3

Chapter 6 The 2 k Factorial Design Solutions

Chapter 10. Design of Experiments and Analysis of Variance

Contents. TAMS38 - Lecture 10 Response surface. Lecturer: Jolanta Pielaszkiewicz. Response surface 3. Response surface, cont. 4

Lec 5: Factorial Experiment

1-Way ANOVA MATH 143. Spring Department of Mathematics and Statistics Calvin College

Analysis of Variance

MBA 605, Business Analytics Donald D. Conant, Ph.D. Master of Business Administration

These are all actually contrasts (the coef sum to zero). What are these contrasts representing? What would make them large?

Statistical Modelling in Stata 5: Linear Models

Lecture 14: ANOVA and the F-test

Part 5 Introduction to Factorials

T-test: means of Spock's judge versus all other judges 1 12:10 Wednesday, January 5, judge1 N Mean Std Dev Std Err Minimum Maximum

EXST Regression Techniques Page 1. We can also test the hypothesis H :" œ 0 versus H :"

The legacy of Sir Ronald A. Fisher. Fisher s three fundamental principles: local control, replication, and randomization.

sociology 362 regression

Lec 1: An Introduction to ANOVA

Regression Analysis. Simple Regression Multivariate Regression Stepwise Regression Replication and Prediction Error EE290H F05

2.830J / 6.780J / ESD.63J Control of Manufacturing Processes (SMA 6303) Spring 2008

1 Independent Practice: Hypothesis tests for one parameter:

Chap The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

4.8 Alternate Analysis as a Oneway ANOVA

Lecture 2. The Simple Linear Regression Model: Matrix Approach

CHAPTER 5 NON-LINEAR SURROGATE MODEL

Inferences for Regression

Introduction to hypothesis testing

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. PROBLEM SET No. 5 Official Solutions

RESPONSE SURFACE MODELLING, RSM

Chapter 4 Randomized Blocks, Latin Squares, and Related Designs Solutions

One-Way Analysis of Variance. With regression, we related two quantitative, typically continuous variables.

Factorial Treatment Structure: Part I. Lukas Meier, Seminar für Statistik

Workshop 7.4a: Single factor ANOVA

FACTORIAL DESIGNS and NESTED DESIGNS

Design and Analysis of Experiments

Analysis of variance

Summary of Chapter 7 (Sections ) and Chapter 8 (Section 8.1)

Brief Sketch of Solutions: Tutorial 3. 3) unit root tests

Topic 20: Single Factor Analysis of Variance

df=degrees of freedom = n - 1

Multiple Predictor Variables: ANOVA

Stat 500 Midterm 2 12 November 2009 page 0 of 11

Ch 3: Multiple Linear Regression

The One-Way Repeated-Measures ANOVA. (For Within-Subjects Designs)

In a one-way ANOVA, the total sums of squares among observations is partitioned into two components: Sums of squares represent:

Study of the effect of machining parameters on material removal rate and electrode wear during Electric Discharge Machining of mild steel

One-way ANOVA. Experimental Design. One-way ANOVA

7. Response Surface Methodology (Ch.10. Regression Modeling Ch. 11. Response Surface Methodology)

Example: Four levels of herbicide strength in an experiment on dry weight of treated plants.

STAT Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance

Ch 2: Simple Linear Regression

Lecture 1 Linear Regression with One Predictor Variable.p2

General Linear Model (Chapter 4)

Chapter 14 Student Lecture Notes Department of Quantitative Methods & Information Systems. Business Statistics. Chapter 14 Multiple Regression

3. Factorial Experiments (Ch.5. Factorial Experiments)

Note: The problem numbering below may not reflect actual numbering in DGE.

Josh Engwer (TTU) 1-Factor ANOVA / 32

ANOVA Analysis of Variance

ANOVA Situation The F Statistic Multiple Comparisons. 1-Way ANOVA MATH 143. Department of Mathematics and Statistics Calvin College

Solution to Final Exam

Regression: Main Ideas Setting: Quantitative outcome with a quantitative explanatory variable. Example, cont.

Statistics 5100 Spring 2018 Exam 1

Transcription:

to a 2 k Designs Section 6-6 page 271 Based on the idea of replicating some of the runs in a factorial design 2 level designs assume linearity. If interaction terms are added to model some curvature results from the twisting of the planes! Runs at the center provide an estimate of error and allow the experimenter to distinguish between two possible models: i.e Provides a check for curvature! First-order model (interaction) Second-order model 0 0 k k k y = β + β x + β x x + ε i i ij i j i= 1 i= 1 j> i k k k k 2 i i ij i j ii i i= 1 i= 1 j> i i= 1 y = β + β x + β x x + β x + ε 1

to a 2 k Designs Section 6-6 page 271 First-order model (interaction) Second-order model 0 0 k k k y = β + β x + β x x + ε i i ij i j i= 1 i= 1 j> i k k k k 2 i i ij i j ii i i= 1 i= 1 j> i i= 1 y = β + β x + β x x + β x + ε There is the possibility that the 2 nd order model is a better fit, So how do we ensure we test for this? The addition of replicated center points adds protection against curvature from second order effects. These replicated points at the design center do not affect the estimates of the effects. When we add centerpoints we assume the Factors are quantitative. 2

to a 2 k Designs Adding centerpoints to a factorial design. Add a zero level to the FACTORS levels tested Define Centerpoint replicates: n c 3

to a 2 k Designs Adding centerpoints to a factorial design. This is a wise thing to do as there are significant benefits: 1. Improved model and determining if curvature is significant. Factorial designs without centerpoints assume linear relationships. Centerpoints validate quadratic models such as: curvature 2. Independent estimate of error 4

BASIC IDEA: Average of the four corners minus the average of the center : If large significant Curvature exists! y F = y C The hypotheses are: SS Pure Quad H H 0 1 = no "curvature" k : β = 0 i= 1 k : β 0 i= 1 ii ii nn F C( yf yc) n + n F C 2 This sum of squares has a single degree of freedom 5

Example 6-6, Pg. 273: Chemical Engineer adds centerpoints to experiment because they are not sure about assumption of linearity n C = 5 Usually between 3 and 6 center points will work well Design-Expert provides the analysis, including the F-test for pure quadratic curvature 6

to a 2 k Designs ANOVA for Example 6-6 page 274 Response: yield ANOVA for Selected Factorial Model Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares] Sum of Mean F Source Squares DF Square Value Prob > F Model 2.83 3 0.94 21.92 0.0060 A 2.40 1 2.40 55.87 0.0017 B 0.42 1 0.42 9.83 0.0350 AB 2.500E-003 1 2.500E-003 0.058 0.8213 Curvature 0.0027 1 0.0027 0.063 0.8137 Pure Error 0.17 4 0.043 Cor Total 3.00 8 Std. Dev. 0.21 R-Squared 0.9427 Mean 40.44 Adj R-Squared 0.8996 C.V. 0.51 Pred R-Squared N/A PRESS N/A Adeq Precision 14.234 So what can we say about the 2nd order curvature for this model? 7

to a 2 k Designs ANOVA for Example 6-6 page 274 Hypothesis Test for Curvature: Test statistic: n f = 4; n c = 5 ; d.o.f. = 7 s e = s c =0.21 t curv = 0.072 t 0.25,7 = 2.36 Thus we conclude: Curvature is not significant! 8

to a 2 k Designs ANOVA for Example 6-6 page 274 Hypothesis Test for Curvature: EXCEL statistics: For this Example: Curvature is not significant! Corners Centerpoints Yf Yc 40 40.3 41.6 40.5 40.9 40.7 39.3 40.2 40.6 AVERAGE 40.45 40.46 SD 0.21 t curv 0.07188852 t 0.025,7 2.36462256 TINV(.05,7) 9

: CCD design If curvature is significant, augment the design with axial runs to create a central composite design. The CCD is a very effective design for fitting a second-order response surface model ( Chap 11) Four axial runs 10

Practical Use of Center Points (pg. 275) Like the control group! 1. Use current operating conditions as the center point. 2. Check for abnormal conditions during the time the experiment was conducted. 3. Check for time trends ( process stability) Run one at start, middle and end or experimental runs. 4. Use center points as the first few runs when there is little or no information available about the magnitude of error. See if variation is large before proceeding with experiment. If too large STOP and figure out why before running experiment! 5. Center points and qualitative factors? >>>>> 11

Center Points and Qualitative Factors Placed at center for quantitative factors Temperature and time 12