PROJECT PARTNER: PROJECT PARTNER:

Similar documents
Title of the Project: Distribution and population status of Arkansas bumble bees

Project Budget: State Wildlife Grant Requested: $16,412 Project Match (UARK in kind services): $5,744 Total Project Cost: $22,156

Conservation genetics of the Ozark pocket gopher

I L L I N 0 I S PRODUCTION NOTE. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.

Analysis of Multivariate Ecological Data

United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Northeast Region

Mobrand to Jones and Stokes. Sustainable Fisheries Management Use of EDT

Project Leader: Project Partners:

Project Title: Eleven Point River Streambank Erosion Assessment

Assessing Michigan s Biological diversity. Michigan Natural Features Inventory MSU Extension

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2019 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Project Primary Contact: Gregg Servheen, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, PO Box 25 Boise, ID ,

Birch Creek Geomorphic Assessment and Action Plan

Using Big Interagency Databases to Identify Climate Refugia for Idaho s Species of Concern

Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO

ICRP & Alliance, Integrated Protection of People and the Environment

Temporal eigenfunction methods for multiscale analysis of community composition and other multivariate data

EAGLES NEST AND PIASA ISLANDS

Title: Status, Distribution, and Genetics of Three Arkansas Crayfish: Cambarus causeyi, Procambarus parasimulans, and Orconectes meeki brevis

ANIMAL ECOLOGY (A ECL)

Springsnails. An Introduction for Conservation Partners. Jeff Sorensen, AZ Game & Fish Dept. AZ Heritage Fund

Community surveys through space and time: testing the space time interaction

23. SUBSISTENCE USES AND TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE

Use of benthic invertebrate biological indicators in evaluating sediment deposition impairment on the Middle Truckee River, California

Nebraska Conservation and Environmental Review Tool (CERT): Terminology used in the Tables of the CERT Report

Statewide Topographic Mapping Program

How GIS Can Help With Tribal Safety Planning

Grant Opportunity Monitoring Bi-State Sage-grouse Populations in Nevada

World rivers investigation

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

DATABASE DEVELOPMENT & SPATIAL ANALYSES IN SUPPORT OF TENNESSEE S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN Data and Methods Update

Inter State Large Navigable Rivers of the United States

Community surveys through space and time: testing the space-time interaction in the absence of replication

A New Class of Spatial Statistical Model for Data on Stream Networks: Overview and Applications

Figure 43 - The three components of spatial variation

Metadata Drava & Mura River Basins (Austria)

PLANT BIOLOGY (PBIO) Plant Biology (PBIO) 1

Applications of GIS in management and planning


SEAGRASS COVERAGE TRENDS IN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON SYSTEM

Introduction to Part III Examining wildlife distributions and abundance using boat surveys

The River Continuum Concept (or not?) Stream Classification

Modeling Fish Assemblages in Stream Networks Representation of Stream Network Introduction habitat attributes Criteria for Success

Native species (Forbes and Graminoids) Less than 5% woody plant species. Inclusions of vernal pools. High plant diversity

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund 2010 Request for Proposals (RFP)

Community surveys through space and time: testing the space-time interaction in the absence of replication

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

Doug Kluck NOAA Kansas City, MO National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI) National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS)

NUPP ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY 2018 ARKANSAS STATE WILDLIFE GRANT PRE-PROPOSAL 1

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

Assessment. Assessment

Conserving freshwater ecosystem values in Tasmania, Australia: identification and application of freshwater conservation management priority areas

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

Spatial eigenfunction modelling: recent developments

Puakea, Hawaiÿi. Puakea, Hawaiÿi WATERSHED FEATURES

EDUCATION PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS

Squaw Creek. General Information

Continental Divide National Scenic Trail GIS Program

Kaskaskia Morphology Study Headwaters to Lake Shelbyville

EASTERN ARIZONA COLLEGE Biology Concepts

Enhancing the Aquatic Gap Analysis for Arkansas: Developing Reach-Scale Species Distribution Maps for Crayfish and Mussel Species in Arkansas

Hydrologic Analysis for Ecosystem Restoration

San Joaquin River Tributary Sediment Transport and Geomorphology Study

Welcome to the Department of Biological Sciences. Main Office: Conant Science 301 Mrs. Tracie Fagan Admin. Assistant Phone:

PROGRESS REPORT for COOPERATIVE BOBCAT RESEARCH PROJECT. Period Covered: 1 January 31 May Prepared by

Arkansas Retiree In-Migration: A Regional Analysis

Keanahalululu Gulch, Hawaiÿi

Fish Passage and Abundance around Grade Control Structures on Incised Streams in Western Iowa

Using multitable techniques for assessing Phytoplankton Structure and Succession in the Reservoir Marne (Seine Catchment Area, France)

4840 South State Rd Cell:

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Ecological Land Cover Classification For a Natural Resources Inventory in the Kansas City Region, USA

Leaf Herbivory and Symmetry

Nathan C. Young. Education

TITLE: Assessment of aspen leaf miner distribution in Alaska using satellite imagery.

Spatial Variation in Local Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes

Data Dictionary for Observation Data Transcription Reports from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Tornado Hazard Risk Analysis: A Report for Rutherford County Emergency Management Agency

Water Temperature Monitoring of the Klamath River Mainstem

GIS Data, Technology, and Models. to Integrate Information and Improve Transportation Decision-Making. within the Eco-Logical* Framework for Oregon

HABITAT SUITABILITY MODELS: RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Academic and Student Affairs ******************************************************************************

Bombing for Biodiversity in the United States: Response to Zentelis & Lindenmayer 2015

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

EMILY JONES B.S. in Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis

low turbidity high turbidity

Licensed Science Officer Benchmark

Areas of Conservation Emphasis (ACE-II) Project Report

Job Announcement for an Assistant Professor at the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency

VarCan (version 1): Variation Estimation and Partitioning in Canonical Analysis

GRADUATE CERTIFICATE PROGRAM

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

PCB6675C, BOT6935, ZOO6927 Evolutionary Biogeography Spring 2014

GIS Data and Technology to Support Transportation & MPO Decision-Making & Planning. using an Eco-Logical* Approach within the Kansas City Region

Taxon: generally refers to any named group of organisms, such as species, genus, family, order, etc.. Node: represents the hypothetical ancestor

Motivation for project:

INFLUENCE OF A COMMON STREAM RESTORATION PRACTICE ON FISH COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND DIETS

State GIS Officer/GIS Data

Salinity Gradients in the Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve. Kimberly Bittler GIS and Water Resources Fall 2011

Monitoring and evaluation of benthic macroinvertebrates in the Big Hole River and tributaries

Transcription:

PROJECT TITLE: Development of a Statewide Freshwater Mussel Monitoring Program in Arkansas PROJECT SUMMARY: A large data set exists for Arkansas' large river mussel fauna that is maintained in the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission mussel database. In general, most Arkansas rivers have historically diverse mussel populations with relatively large assemblages (beds) dispersed along their length. Due to a variety of environmental changes and stressors, it is important to periodically assess the health and well-being of aquatic habitats and mussel communities. A program is needed to monitor SGCN mussels in Arkansas rivers, and it should be developed utilizing existing mussel assemblage (bed), mussel distribution, and mussel population data. Stream segments to be monitored will be selected from the lower White River (Batesville to mouth), Ouachita River, Black River, Little River, St. Francis River, Cache River, Spring River, Strawberry River, Little Missouri River, Saline River, and potentially other rivers or streams for which data exist. The objective of this study is to examine the longitudinal distribution of freshwater mussels in Arkansas streams, statistically define unique community types along the continuum for selected streams, and recommend specific sites for long-term community monitoring. PROJECT LEADER PROJECT PARTNER: PROJECT PARTNER: Dr. Virginie Rolland Dr. Brook L. Fluker, Dr. John L. Harris, Assistant Professor Assistant Professor Adj. Asst. Professor Dept. of Biological Sciences Dept. of Biological Sciences Dept. of Biological Sciences Arkansas State University Arkansas State University Arkansas State University P.O. Box 599 P. O. Box 599 10846 Plantation Lake Road State University, AR 72467 State University, AR 72467 Scott, AR 72142 (501)972-3194 (870)972-3253 (501)961-1419 vrolland@astate.edu bfluker@astate.edu joharris@astate.edu PROJECT BUDGET: AMOUNT REQUESTED - $16,715 MATCH AMOUNT (36%) - $9,461 TOTAL AMOUNT - $26,176 [1]

PROJECT STATEMENT: Need: Freshwater mussels represent some of the most imperiled species in North America. Locating individuals and populations is a necessary first step in any conservation effort (Harris et al. 2010). Since the mid-1980s, systematic inventory of freshwater mussels has been undertaken in drainages throughout AR by a large number of researchers (Harris and Gordon 1988, Ahlstedt and Jenkinson 1991, Rust 1993, Christian 1995, Davidson 1997, Davidson, et al. 1997, Harris 1997, Posey 1997, Davidson, et al. 2000, Stoeckel and Davidson. 2000, Davidson and Clem 2002, 2004, Christian and Harris 2004, Christian et al. 2005, Harris et al. 2007, Trauth et al. 2007, Brooks et al. 2008, Martin et al. 2010, Matthews et al. 2010, Wentz et al. 2010, Bouldin et al. 2013a, 2013b; Bouldin et al. 2015). Many of the mussel surveys have been conducted by researchers associated with or graduates of Arkansas State University. Data from mussel studies have been incorporated into the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission maintained mussel database that includes information for 25,812 species occurrences from 3,441 individual site locations (Harris and Posey 2015). In order to manage freshwater mussel resources, it is imperative to sample populations over time to evaluate assemblage health and to assess population status of species of greatest conservation need (SGCN). Therefore, it is necessary to develop and implement a statewide monitoring network for mussel communities in AR. This proposal directly addresses the need to develop a statewide large river monitoring program protocol which is listed under mussels as Priority # 1 in the 2017 AR RFP. Purpose and Objectives: The purpose of this project is to analyze existing data for freshwater mussel species and construct a statewide mussel monitoring program for Arkansas. The objectives of the study are as follows: (1) examine the longitudinal distribution of freshwater mussels in Arkansas streams; (2) statistically define unique community types along the longitudinal continuum for selected streams; and (3) recommend specific sites for long-term community monitoring. Location: The proposed project is located in every ecoregion throughout Arkansas (Fig. 1). Proposed steams to be analyzed by river basin include: Arkansas River Basin: Arkansas River, Big Piney Creek, Cadron Creek, Illinois Bayou, Illinois River Ouachita River Basin: Bayou Bartholomew, Little Missouri River, Ouachita River, Saline River Red River Basin: Cossatot River, Little River, Saline River St. Francis River Basin: St. Francis River, Tyronza River White River Basin: Black River, Buffalo River, Cache River, Little Red River, Strawberry River, Spring River, South Fork Spring River, White River Approach: We will first acquire GIS layers or paper maps from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for river mile (kilometer) locations in AR rivers and streams. For streams to be analyzed that do not have established river miles, we will use GIS to establish stream mile locations beginning at the stream mouth and extending upstream to the known limit of mussel occurrence. We will utilize the most current version of the AGFC mussel database to acquire/assign unique sample sites, assign a stream mile (km), and convert mussel sample data for each species to percent composition by site and sample date. We will compare mussel species [2]

in the database with the original source reports and QA/QC species identifications and taxonomy to conform to current usage. The presence and abundance of species are distributed in a non-random way (Dray et al. 2012). Therefore, searching for spatial structures at multiple scales is necessary to determine areas of biological relevance for appropriate monitoring. Dray et al. (2012) recommend combining multivariate analyses and more recent methods of spatial pattern analysis. We will utilize the complete data set to analyze the Figure 1. Proposed project is located over the entire state of Arkansas. spatial variation of community composition at multiple scales based on both presence-absence and abundance data. First, we will use a Moran s I correlogram to identify the scale(s) of spatial structure if spatial autocorrelation is present (Dorman et al. 2007). Second, we will use a multivariate analysis such as redundancy analysis (RDA; Finn and Poff 2005) and/or detrended correspondence analysis (DCA; Matthews, et al. 2010) to identify the main spatial patterns, after using a chi-square transformation to put emphasis on rare species (Dray et al. 2012). Finally, the asymmetric eigenvector maps (AEM) technique (Blanchet et al. 2008) has been developed for cases of directional spatial patterns such as river reaches, but other methods such as principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM, Borcard et al. 2004) or multivariate regression tree models (Chambers and Woolnaugh 2016) may be used. Methods like AEM and PCNM allow analyzing temporal trends or the effect of environmental factors on beta diversity while explicitly accounting for identified spatial patterns (Dray et al. 2012). Together, these methods will help identify if mussel species assemblages are clustered, distributed along a gradient, or intermediate with transition zones. They will further help us identify sites of sampling from each community type within each river for future long-term monitoring. Expected Results and Benefits: The proposed project will provide a framework for establishing a long-term freshwater mussel monitoring program for Arkansas. The long-term monitoring program will provide a mechanism to evaluate assemblage health and to assess population status of species of greatest conservation need (SGCN). Proposed start date: October 1, 2017 Completion date: September 30, 2019 References: References cited in this proposal can be provided upon request. [3]

Budget: Budget Justification Year 1 Year 1 Year 2 Year 2 Total Total PERSONNEL Virginie Rolland (PI) 0.25 month summer salary, each year $1,645 $1,645 $3,290 Technician $1,300/month, 3 months each year $3,900 $3,900 $7,800 Virginie Rolland (PI) 0.2 month time during academic year $1,316 $1,316 Brook Fluker (Co-PI) 0.2 month time during academic year $1,307 $1,307 FRINGE BENEFITS Virginie Rolland (PI) 17.84% of salary base $294 $294 $588 Technician 7.84% of salary base $306 $306 $612 Virginie Rolland (PI) 34.82% of matched salary $459 $459 Brook Fluker (Co-PI) 34.82% of matched salary $456 $456 SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL & FRINGE $6,145 $1,763 $6,145 $1,775 $12,290 $3,538 TRAVEL Harris travel to A-State Campus 4 round trips (1096 total miles) @ $0.42/mile $231 $231 $462 Harris Lodging, Jonesboro, AR 16 nights @ $89/night $712 $712 $1,424 Harris Per Diem 20 days @ $51 $510 $510 $1,020 TRAVEL SUBTOTAL $1,453 $1,453 $2,906 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $7,598 $1,763 $7,598 $1,775 $15,196 $3,538 INDIRECT COSTS (10% restricted) $760 $760 $1,520 Waived Indirect costs (29.73% [ASU rate is 39.73%]) $2,259 $2,259 $4,518 39.73% of matched salary and fringe waived $700 $705 $1,406 Totals $8,358 $4,722 $8,358 $4,739 $16,715 $9,461 [4]

Project Title: Development of a Statewide Freshwater Mussel Monitoring Program in Arkansas Principal Investigator: Dr. Virginie Rolland QUALIFICATIONS: Virginie Rolland: Received Ph.D. in Population Ecology from the University of Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France in 2008, with an emphasis on quantitative analyses of a large 40-year albatross dataset. Has 12 years of experience manipulating and analyzing datasets from various taxa (birds, bats, small mammals, turtles), resulting in 15 publications and 30+ presentations at local to international conferences. Has graduated 3 MS students, is supervising 2 MS and 1 PhD students, and has served on 23 graduate student committees. Brook L. Fluker: Received Ph.D. in Biology from the University of Alabama in 2011 with an emphasis in phylogenetics, population genetics, and conservation of freshwater fishes. Has 13 years of experience sampling, handling, and collecting tissues from freshwater fishes in North America, including experience assisting with surveys of freshwater mussels and snails and seasonal abundance surveys for several federally protected fishes. This work has resulted in six publications, 10 technical reports, and 40+ presentations at professional conferences and meetings. John L. Harris: Received Ph.D. in Zoology from University of Tennessee in 1986 with emphasis in taxonomy and systematics of aquatic fauna concentrating on fish and mussels. Has 30+ years experience in performing mussel surveys and impact analyses resulting in numerous peerreviewed publications and/or agency reports. Has co-directed or been a committee member for 15 graduate students researching distribution and/or life history aspects of freshwater mussels in Arkansas. [5]