The Economics of E-commerce and Technology

Similar documents
Wireless Network Pricing Chapter 6: Oligopoly Pricing

The Economics of E-commerce and Technology

Oligopoly. Oligopoly. Xiang Sun. Wuhan University. March 23 April 6, /149

Bertrand Model of Price Competition. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 1

Oligopoly Theory. This might be revision in parts, but (if so) it is good stu to be reminded of...

Competition Policy - Spring 2005 Monopolization practices I

Oligopoly Notes. Simona Montagnana

Industrial Organization Lecture 7: Product Differentiation

Growing competition in electricity industry and the power source structure

Oligopoly Theory 2 Bertrand Market Games

Answer Key: Problem Set 3

Retailer s product line choice with manufacturer s multi-channel marketing

Oligopoly. Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 Spring 2009

Classic Oligopoly Models: Bertrand and Cournot

Market Power. Economics II: Microeconomics. December Aslanyan (VŠE) Oligopoly 12/09 1 / 39

Positions, Activities and Organization: An economist view of strategy from conception to implementation

Durable goods monopolist

Basics of Game Theory

Lecture 1: Introduction to IO Tom Holden

Platform Competition under Asymmetric Information preliminary

1 Oligopoly: Bertrand Model

Oligopoly. Firm s Profit Maximization Firm i s profit maximization problem: Static oligopoly model with n firms producing homogenous product.

Bargaining, Contracts, and Theories of the Firm. Dr. Margaret Meyer Nuffield College

Bresnahan, JIE 87: Competition and Collusion in the American Automobile Industry: 1955 Price War

Lecture Notes: Industrial Organization Joe Chen 1. The Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) paradigm:

Industrial Organization, Fall 2011: Midterm Exam Solutions and Comments Date: Wednesday October

Price setting on a network

Competition Policy - Spring 2005 Collusion II

Design Patent Damages under Sequential Innovation

Dynamic Games and Bargaining. Johan Stennek

EconS Advanced Microeconomics II Handout on Repeated Games

Merchants vs. Two-Sided Platforms: Competing Intermediation Models

The Economics of E-commerce and Technology

The Economics of E-commerce and Technology

EconS Sequential Competition

Bayesian Games and Mechanism Design Definition of Bayes Equilibrium

Lecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) -

Negotiation: Strategic Approach

Trade policy III: Export subsidies

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Game Theory (EMBA 296 & EWMBA 211) Summer 2016

Entry under an Information-Gathering Monopoly Alex Barrachina* June Abstract

THEORY OF OLIGOPOLIES: DYNAMICS AND STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIA

Quantum Networking: Deployments, Components and Opportunities September 2017

Lecture 8: Incomplete Contracts

4. Partial Equilibrium under Imperfect Competition

R&D Collaboration in Collusive Networks

Profitability of R&D main explanatory factor of neo-schumpeterian growth

Augmented Reality Market Research Report- Global Forecast till 2023

On revealed preferences in oligopoly games

Some forgotten equilibria of the Bertrand duopoly!?

8. MARKET POWER: STATIC MODELS

Aftermarket Power and Basic Market Competition

ANSWER KEY 2 GAME THEORY, ECON 395

Part I: Exercise of Monopoly Power. Chapter 1: Monopoly. Two assumptions: A1. Quality of goods is known by consumers; A2. No price discrimination.

9 A Class of Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information:

Own price influences in a Stackelberg leadership with demand uncertainty

Game Theory. Wolfgang Frimmel. Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium

Some Notes on Adverse Selection

Aftermarket Power and Basic Market Competition

Product differences and prices

NEW FORMS OF COMPETITION - HOW MARKETS WORK IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY

SI Information Economics, Winter 2007

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6

Microeconomics II Lecture 4: Incomplete Information Karl Wärneryd Stockholm School of Economics November 2016

EconS Vertical Integration

Welfare Reducing Mergers in Differentiated Oligopolies with Free Entry

14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 3 Competition, Policy and Technological Progress

Department of Agricultural Economics. PhD Qualifier Examination. May 2009

Game of Platforms: Strategic Expansion in Two-Sided Markets

EconS Nash Equilibrium in Games with Continuous Action Spaces.

Advanced Microeconomics

Static Models of Oligopoly

EC3224 Autumn Lecture #03 Applications of Nash Equilibrium

FORWARD INDUCTION AND SUNK COSTS GIVE AVERAGE COST PRICING. Jean-Pierre Ponssard. Abstract

A General Bundling Theory; an Application to Complementary Demand and Separate Sellers

Among the available options: horizontal separation (HS) and vertical separation (VS)

14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 4 Competition and Innovation

Lecture 1. Evolution of Market Concentration

Dynamic Games, II: Bargaining

Algorithmic Game Theory. Alexander Skopalik

Technical Appendix for: Complementary Goods: Creating, Capturing and Competing for Value

Lecture 6. Xavier Gabaix. March 11, 2004

EC611--Managerial Economics

Game Theory and Algorithms Lecture 2: Nash Equilibria and Examples

Chapter 5. Transmission networks and electricity markets

Asymptotic relations in Cournot s game

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE doi /mnsc ec pp. ec1 ec6

Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers and Upstream Input Providers

Paul Schrimpf. November 25, UBC Economics 565. Price dispersion and search. Paul Schrimpf. Introduction. Models of price dispersion

Interdependent Value Auctions with an Insider Bidder 1

Endogenous Games and Mechanisms: Side Payments Among Players

Competition in Standard-Setting with Network Effects

Most Favoured Nation Clauses Revisited

A Theory of Endogenous Commitment

Increasingly, economists are asked not just to study or explain or interpret markets, but to design them.

Bayesian Nash equilibrium

Credence Goods and Vertical Product Differentiation: The Impact of Labeling Policies* Ian Sheldon (Ohio State University)

Advanced Economic Theory Lecture 9. Bilateral Asymmetric Information. Double Auction (Chatterjee and Samuelson, 1983).

Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium. Definition. The single-crossing property. This is a draft; me with comments, typos, clarifications, etc.

Industrial Organization

Transcription:

The Economics of E-commerce and Technology Industry Analysis 1 9/25/16

Industry Profits } In Econ 11, Economic Profits = 0 } In reality, many industries have much higher profits: 2 9/25/16

Industry Analysis } Identify factors determining industry profitability. } Provides context for strategic analysis. } Analysis depends on market definition. } Porter s five forces } Substitutes } Competitor Rivalry } New entrants } Buyer bargaining power } Supplier bargaining power } Complements 3 9/25/16

Market Definition } How define the market for Dell Desktop? } Other desktops? Laptops? Netbooks? ipads? } It depends what question you are asking! } You should think about } Demand interactions: elasticity of substitution } Strategic interactions: whether firm A reacts to firm B s decisions. } Case Study: Epson } Epson dominated low-end dot-matrix printers. } HP dominated the Inkjet and high-end laser printer market. } Epson in wrong market, so launched cheap laser printer in 1989. } Price war: Laser prices fell, Inkjet prices fell, and dot-matrix market..? } Lesson: There s always a bigger market. 4 9/25/16

There s always a bigger market 5 9/25/16

Force 1: Outside Substitutes } Substitutes outside the market } Factors that determine willingness to pay. } Ignore strategic interaction } Fixing others prices, markup determined by demand elasticity p c 1 p dq = where e = p e q dp } With multi-good firms, elasticity is less clear } Demand for iphones is inelastic } Demand for iphone 7 with 128GB memory 6 9/25/16

Force 1: Inside Substitutes } Substitutes inside the market } Pay attention to strategic interaction } Consider two products: What is a substitute? 1. Price of x goes up, then demand for y goes up. 2. If x and y indivisible goods, V xy <V x +V y } Degree of substitutability matters } Depends on amount of product differentiation. } Depends on decreasing marginal utility } Affects how our firm interacts with competitors. 7 9/25/16

Force 2: Competitor Rivalry } Bertrand benchmark } Assumptions } Two firms simultaneously set prices } Constant marginal cost, c } Firm with lowest price serves whole market } Example: gas stations next to each other. } What is equilibrium price? 8 9/25/16

Force 2: Rivalry } Dominant firm (e.g. ebay) } Biggest danger comes from new entrants. } Oligopoly (e.g. Dating sites match, eharmony, jdate) } Competition and cooperation issues become interesting! } Fragmented (e.g. blogs) } Little strategy for fragmented industry. 9 9/25/16

Force 2: Competitor Rivalry } What determines how intense competition is? } Cost structure } Supply side returns to scale } Capacity constraints } Product differentiation } Real differences in products } Switching costs } Search costs } Network effects (demand side returns to scale) } Collusion } Explicit or tacit 10 9/25/16

Force 3: New Entrants } Incumbents often blind-sided by new products. } IBM and Microsoft/Intel } Microsoft and the internet. } Are fixed costs an entry barrier? } Intuition: High fixed costs reduce entry, lower elasticity of demand and increase profits. } Flaw in argument? } Profits are positive after paid fixed cost. } But what about ex-ante? } Need asymmetric entry barrier } Generates incumbency advantage. 11 9/25/16

First Mover Advantage via Competition } Suppose firm A is in industry. } Has marginal cost 5. } 100 customers with value 10. } A is currently charging p=10 and making π=100(10-5)=500. } Firm B is considering entering } Has marginal cost 4 and fixed cost 150. } Good is homogenous. } Should firm B enter? } If it enters, Bertrand competition implies price falls to p=5. } B s profits are π=100(5-4)-150 = -50. } B should not enter, anticipating the cut-throat competition. 12 9/25/16

Force 3: Entry Barriers } Demand side } Switching costs (e.g. TurboTax) } Demand-side returns to scale (network effects, e.g. MS Word) } Reputation (e.g. Apple) } Supply side } Proprietary technology (e.g. patents) } Access to raw materials (e.g. Apple and flash memory) } Learning curve (e.g. NY Times) } Equilibrium } The threat of post-entry price war. (e.g. CD Phone Books) } Strategy } Should you preemptively block or fight entry? 13 9/25/16

Force 4/5: Buyer/Supplier Bargaining Power } How big is the pie? } Potential pie = value of relationship. } How is pie split? } How much do you get vs. suppliers/buyers? } There may be a tradeoff between these } Ex-ante costs of negotiation } Inefficient investment because of holdup (wk 5) } Ex-post costs of negotiation } Market power (e.g. monopoly loss, double marginalization (wk 4)) } Delay in production (e.g. strikes) } Bargaining costs (e.g. lawyers) 14 9/25/16

The Cost of Litigation 15 9/25/16

What determines bargaining power? } Suppose selling cars } 10 sellers with cost $0, 10 buyers with value $100. } Long vs Short side of market } What if there were only 9 sellers? } Concentration on each side of market } What if 1 seller with 10 cars? } Commitment power } What if seller could make TIOLI offer and walk away? } Information } What if seller doesn t know if value is $100 or $150? 16 9/25/16

Case Study: Nintendo } Nintendo invented NES in 1983 } Cheap hardware: 8-bit processor dated to 1970s. } Limited power of software firm } Limited to 5 titles a year. } Exclusivity condition: games only for Nintendo. } Limited power of retailers (e.g. Walmart, ToysRUS) } In 1988 retailers requested 110m units. } Supplied 33m units. } Threaten to cut off, if carry competitors products? } Nintendo gets large slice of pie } Danger: strategies reduce pie and invite entry 17 9/25/16

Force 6: Complementors } What is a complement? 1. Price of x goes up, then demand for y goes down. 2. If x and y indivisible goods, V xy >V x +V y } Complementors make the pie bigger. } Xbox and games } When launched in 2001, not many games for Xbox } It bought Bunjie and used Halo as launch title. } Provide tools to encourage third party developers. } Relation to platform market } Xbox is platform where users interact with software. } Not all platforms are for complementors: Google searchers may dislike ads. 18 9/25/16

Example: Amazon s Book Business } Substitutes: } Inside market: other booksellers (online, offline), ebooks } Outside market: libraries, magazines, TV etc. } Buyers: } Individuals. Buyer bargaining power: Little. } Suppliers: } Publishers, USPS. Supplier bargaining power: Varying. } Rivals: } Online/offline sellers. Small sellers, B&N, Walmart, Apple etc. } Industry structure: Oligopoly with fragmented fringe. } Entrants: } Specialty sellers, other offline stores. Apple? } Compliments: } Broadband, reviews, credit cards. 19 9/25/16