Rigidity of Black Holes

Similar documents
RIGIDITY OF STATIONARY BLACK HOLES WITH SMALL ANGULAR MOMENTUM ON THE HORIZON

Non-existence of time-periodic dynamics in general relativity

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Title. On the stability of the wave-map equation in Kerr spaces. Alexandru D. Ionescu

Myths, Facts and Dreams in General Relativity

Singularity formation in black hole interiors

A characterization of Kerr-Newman space-times and some applications

An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem

Non-existence of time-periodic vacuum spacetimes

Stability and Instability of Black Holes

HAWKING S LOCAL RIGIDITY THEOREM WITHOUT ANALYTICITY

THE INITIAL VALUE FORMULATION OF GENERAL RELATIVITY

Initial-Value Problems in General Relativity

UNIQUENESS OF STATIC BLACK-HOLES WITHOUT ANALYTICITY. Piotr T. Chruściel & Gregory J. Galloway

Black Holes and Thermodynamics I: Classical Black Holes

Quasi-local Mass in General Relativity

An Overview of Mathematical General Relativity

On the uniqueness of Kerr-Newman. black holes

Global and local problems with. Kerr s solution.

Stationarity of non-radiating spacetimes

On the topology of black holes and beyond

Electromagnetic Energy for a Charged Kerr Black Hole. in a Uniform Magnetic Field. Abstract

Rigidity of outermost MOTS: the initial data version

Space-Times Admitting Isolated Horizons

Gravitation: Tensor Calculus

Null Cones to Infinity, Curvature Flux, and Bondi Mass

Mathematical Relativity, Spring 2017/18 Instituto Superior Técnico

Quasi-local mass and isometric embedding

Stability and Instability of Extremal Black Holes

Classification theorem for the static and asymptotically flat Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton spacetimes possessing a photon sphere

Stationarity of asymptotically flat non-radiating electrovacuum spacetimes

Four decades of black hole uniqueness theorems Kerrfest, Christchurch 2004

A rotating charged black hole solution in f (R) gravity

Quasi-local Mass and Momentum in General Relativity

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

Time-Periodic Solutions of the Einstein s Field Equations II: Geometric Singularities

A Brief Introduction to Mathematical Relativity

Aspects of Black Hole Physics

Chapter 21. The Kerr solution The Kerr metric in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates

Charge, geometry, and effective mass in the Kerr- Newman solution to the Einstein field equations

The cosmic censorship conjectures in classical general relativity

Umbilic cylinders in General Relativity or the very weird path of trapped photons

Mathematical Journal of Okayama University

INVESTIGATING THE KERR BLACK HOLE USING MAPLE IDAN REGEV. Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto. March 22, 2002.

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 24 Feb 2004

Mass, quasi-local mass, and the flow of static metrics

A Summary of the Black Hole Perturbation Theory. Steven Hochman

General Birkhoff s Theorem

Overview of the proof of the Bounded L 2 Curvature Conjecture. Sergiu Klainerman Igor Rodnianski Jeremie Szeftel

Kerr black hole and rotating wormhole

General Relativity in AdS

MATHEMATICAL GENERAL RELATIVITY: A SAMPLER

Syllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3

PAPER 311 BLACK HOLES

The linear stability of the Schwarzschild solution to gravitational perturbations in the generalised wave gauge

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 12 Sep 2002

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013

CALCULATING THE CURVATURE TENSOR FOR THE 3D GODEL-LIKE SPACETIMES

Angular momentum and Killing potentials

Jose Luis Blázquez Salcedo

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

General Relativity and Important Physical Quantities

2 Carter Penrose diagrams

Thermodynamics of black holes from the Hamiltonian point of view

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 19 Feb 2004

PAPER 52 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Hyperbolic Geometric Flow

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Geometric inequalities for black holes

Localizing solutions of the Einstein equations

Curved spacetime and general covariance

arxiv: v3 [math.ap] 10 Oct 2014

Extremal black holes and near-horizon geometry

Curved Spacetime III Einstein's field equations

Analytic Kerr Solution for Puncture Evolution

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

Rigidity and Non-rigidity Results on the Sphere

BLACK HOLES (ADVANCED GENERAL RELATIV- ITY)

The stability of Kerr-de Sitter black holes

Speed limits in general relativity

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 19 Jun 2009

SageManifolds 1.0. First we set up the notebook to display mathematical objects using LaTeX rendering:

A solution in Weyl gravity with planar symmetry

COSMOLOGICAL TIME VERSUS CMC TIME IN SPACETIMES OF CONSTANT CURVATURE

Pinhole Cam Visualisations of Accretion Disks around Kerr BH

Curved Spacetime I. Dr. Naylor

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 6 Dec 2000

Causality, hyperbolicity, and shock formation in Lovelock theories

Does the third law of black hole thermodynamics really have a serious failure?

The Bounded L 2 curvature conjecture in general relativity

Theoretical Aspects of Black Hole Physics

Asymptotic Behavior of Marginally Trapped Tubes

Higher dimensional Kerr-Schild spacetimes 1

Late-time asymptotics for the wave equation on spherically symmetric, stationary spacetimes

PHYS 514: General Relativity Winter Due: 1:00pm, Tuesday April 19. Hand in your completed exam at my office, RPHYS rm. 309.

OLIVIA MILOJ March 27, 2006 ON THE PENROSE INEQUALITY

N-BLACK HOLE STATIONARY AND AXIALLY EQUATIONS GILBERT WEINSTEIN. Abstract. The Einstein/Maxwell equations reduce in the stationary

Self trapped gravitational waves (geons) with anti-de Sitter asymptotics

Transcription:

Rigidity of Black Holes Sergiu Klainerman Princeton University February 24, 2011

Rigidity of Black Holes PREAMBLES I, II

PREAMBLE I General setting Assume S B two different connected, open, domains and u 1, u 2 smooth solutions of an equation P(u) = 0 in B. Non uniqueness: u 1 u 2 in S but u 1 u 2 in B. Well posedness: u 1, u 2 close in S u 1, u 2 close in B. Unique continuation: u 1 u 2 in S u 1 u 2 in B. However, u 1 may be close to u 2 in S, but completely different in B. Example B = B(0, 2), S = B(0, 1/2) R 2, u n = (x + iy) n are solutions to u = 0, small in S but large in B.

PREAMBLE I General setting Assume S B two different connected, open, domains and u 1, u 2 smooth solutions of an equation P(u) = 0 in B. Non uniqueness: u 1 u 2 in S but u 1 u 2 in B. Well posedness: u 1, u 2 close in S u 1, u 2 close in B. Unique continuation: u 1 u 2 in S u 1 u 2 in B. However, u 1 may be close to u 2 in S, but completely different in B. Example B = B(0, 2), S = B(0, 1/2) R 2, u n = (x + iy) n are solutions to u = 0, small in S but large in B.

PREAMBLE I General setting Assume S B two different connected, open, domains and u 1, u 2 smooth solutions of an equation P(u) = 0 in B. Non uniqueness: u 1 u 2 in S but u 1 u 2 in B. Well posedness: u 1, u 2 close in S u 1, u 2 close in B. Unique continuation: u 1 u 2 in S u 1 u 2 in B. However, u 1 may be close to u 2 in S, but completely different in B. Example B = B(0, 2), S = B(0, 1/2) R 2, u n = (x + iy) n are solutions to u = 0, small in S but large in B.

PREAMBLE I General setting Assume S B two different connected, open, domains and u 1, u 2 smooth solutions of an equation P(u) = 0 in B. Non uniqueness: u 1 u 2 in S but u 1 u 2 in B. Well posedness: u 1, u 2 close in S u 1, u 2 close in B. Unique continuation: u 1 u 2 in S u 1 u 2 in B. However, u 1 may be close to u 2 in S, but completely different in B. Example B = B(0, 2), S = B(0, 1/2) R 2, u n = (x + iy) n are solutions to u = 0, small in S but large in B.

PREAMBLE I General setting Assume S B two different connected, open, domains and u 1, u 2 smooth solutions of an equation P(u) = 0 in B. Non uniqueness: u 1 u 2 in S but u 1 u 2 in B. Well posedness: u 1, u 2 close in S u 1, u 2 close in B. Unique continuation: u 1 u 2 in S u 1 u 2 in B. However, u 1 may be close to u 2 in S, but completely different in B. Example B = B(0, 2), S = B(0, 1/2) R 2, u n = (x + iy) n are solutions to u = 0, small in S but large in B.

PREAMBLE I (Pseudo-convexity) Theorem(Calderon-Hörmander) Given P and S = {h < 0}, dh 0, there exists a condition on h, called pseudo-convexity (with respect to P) which, if satisfied at p S, unique continuation at p. g-pseudo-convexity Defining function h is pseudo-convex at p for, P = g αβ D α D b + B α D α + C If X α X β D α D β h(p) < 0, X T p (M), g(x, X ) = X (h) = 0, Alinhac-Baouendi example If h = x 2 1 in R 1+2, S = {h < 0} and p S, there exists non-vanishing smooth V, φ, vanishing in S and verifying φ + V φ = 0 in a neighborhood of p.

PREAMBLE I (Pseudo-convexity) Theorem(Calderon-Hörmander) Given P and S = {h < 0}, dh 0, there exists a condition on h, called pseudo-convexity (with respect to P) which, if satisfied at p S, unique continuation at p. g-pseudo-convexity Defining function h is pseudo-convex at p for, P = g αβ D α D b + B α D α + C If X α X β D α D β h(p) < 0, X T p (M), g(x, X ) = X (h) = 0, Alinhac-Baouendi example If h = x 2 1 in R 1+2, S = {h < 0} and p S, there exists non-vanishing smooth V, φ, vanishing in S and verifying φ + V φ = 0 in a neighborhood of p.

PREAMBLE I (Pseudo-convexity) Theorem(Calderon-Hörmander) Given P and S = {h < 0}, dh 0, there exists a condition on h, called pseudo-convexity (with respect to P) which, if satisfied at p S, unique continuation at p. g-pseudo-convexity Defining function h is pseudo-convex at p for, P = g αβ D α D b + B α D α + C If X α X β D α D β h(p) < 0, X T p (M), g(x, X ) = X (h) = 0, Alinhac-Baouendi example If h = x 2 1 in R 1+2, S = {h < 0} and p S, there exists non-vanishing smooth V, φ, vanishing in S and verifying φ + V φ = 0 in a neighborhood of p.

PREAMBLE I (A model problem) Theorem[Ionescu-Kl(2008)] Let E = {(t, x) R 1+d : x > t + 1}, φ C 2 solution of { φ = Aφ + d l=0 Bl l φ A, B l C 0 (R 1+d ). φ E = 0 Then, φ = 0 on E. Proof[Carleman estimates] For any φ C 0 (E), λ > 0 sufficiently large λ e λf φ L 2 + e λf Dφ L 2 Cλ 1/2 e λf φ L 2, with f = log ( ( x 1/2) 2 t 2)

PREAMBLE I (A model problem) Theorem[Ionescu-Kl(2008)] Let E = {(t, x) R 1+d : x > t + 1}, φ C 2 solution of { φ = Aφ + d l=0 Bl l φ A, B l C 0 (R 1+d ). φ E = 0 Then, φ = 0 on E. Proof[Carleman estimates] For any φ C 0 (E), λ > 0 sufficiently large λ e λf φ L 2 + e λf Dφ L 2 Cλ 1/2 e λf φ L 2, with f = log ( ( x 1/2) 2 t 2)

PREAMBLE II Problem Given a smooth pseudo-riemannian (M, g), an open subset O M and a smooth Killing vector-field Z in O. Under what assumptions does Z extend (uniquely) as a Killing vector-field in M? Nomizu s theorem If g is real analytic M and O are connected and, M is simply connected Extension holds true. Remark The metric is not assumed to satisfy any specific equation. No assumptions are needed about the boundary of O M and the result is global with only minimal assumptions on the topology

PREAMBLE II Problem Given a smooth pseudo-riemannian (M, g), an open subset O M and a smooth Killing vector-field Z in O. Under what assumptions does Z extend (uniquely) as a Killing vector-field in M? Nomizu s theorem If g is real analytic M and O are connected and, M is simply connected Extension holds true. Remark The metric is not assumed to satisfy any specific equation. No assumptions are needed about the boundary of O M and the result is global with only minimal assumptions on the topology

PREAMBLE II Problem Given a smooth pseudo-riemannian (M, g), an open subset O M and a smooth Killing vector-field Z in O. Under what assumptions does Z extend (uniquely) as a Killing vector-field in M? Nomizu s theorem If g is real analytic M and O are connected and, M is simply connected Extension holds true. Remark The metric is not assumed to satisfy any specific equation. No assumptions are needed about the boundary of O M and the result is global with only minimal assumptions on the topology

Rigidity of Black Holes MAIN NO HAIR CONJECTURE

Kerr spacetimes Kerr K(a, m), 0 a m ρ2 Σ 2 (dt)2 + Σ2 (sin θ) 2 ( ρ 2 dφ 2amr ) 2 Σ 2 dt ρ 2 + (dr)2 + ρ 2 (dθ) 2, = r 2 + a 2 2mr; ρ 2 = r 2 + a 2 (cos θ) 2 ; Σ 2 = (r 2 + a 2 ) 2 a 2 (sin θ) 2. K(a, m) are algebraically special: 18 of the 20 components of the Riemann curvature tensor vanish in a suitable frame (Type D).

Kerr spacetimes Kerr K(a, m), 0 a m ρ2 Σ 2 (dt)2 + Σ2 (sin θ) 2 ( ρ 2 dφ 2amr ) 2 Σ 2 dt ρ 2 + (dr)2 + ρ 2 (dθ) 2, = r 2 + a 2 2mr; ρ 2 = r 2 + a 2 (cos θ) 2 ; Σ 2 = (r 2 + a 2 ) 2 a 2 (sin θ) 2. K(a, m) are algebraically special: 18 of the 20 components of the Riemann curvature tensor vanish in a suitable frame (Type D).

Key properties of the Kerr spaces Solutions of the Einstein vacuum equations. P1 Killing vector field T = t, timelike at infinity, P2 Geometric properties: asymptotic flatness, smooth bifurcate sphere, global hyperbolicity, P3 Non-degenerate if 0 a < m, P4 Killing vector-field Z = φ, with closed orbits, P5 Real-analytic. Definition: A vacuum space-time verifying P1 P3 is called a regular, non-degenerate, stationary vacuum.

Key properties of the Kerr spaces Solutions of the Einstein vacuum equations. P1 Killing vector field T = t, timelike at infinity, P2 Geometric properties: asymptotic flatness, smooth bifurcate sphere, global hyperbolicity, P3 Non-degenerate if 0 a < m, P4 Killing vector-field Z = φ, with closed orbits, P5 Real-analytic. Definition: A vacuum space-time verifying P1 P3 is called a regular, non-degenerate, stationary vacuum.

Main Conjecture Black holes have no hair Conjecture If (M 4, g, T) is regular, non-degenerate, stationary vacuum its domain of outer communication is isometric to the domain of outer communication of a Kerr spacetime K(a, m), 0 a < m. (Carter 1971): axially symmetric black holes have only 2 degrees of freedom. (Robinson 1975): Conjecture holds in the case of axially symmetric black holes. (Hawking 1973): Conjecture holds in the case of real-analytic spacetimes.

Main Conjecture Black holes have no hair Conjecture If (M 4, g, T) is regular, non-degenerate, stationary vacuum its domain of outer communication is isometric to the domain of outer communication of a Kerr spacetime K(a, m), 0 a < m. (Carter 1971): axially symmetric black holes have only 2 degrees of freedom. (Robinson 1975): Conjecture holds in the case of axially symmetric black holes. (Hawking 1973): Conjecture holds in the case of real-analytic spacetimes.

Main Conjecture Black holes have no hair Conjecture If (M 4, g, T) is regular, non-degenerate, stationary vacuum its domain of outer communication is isometric to the domain of outer communication of a Kerr spacetime K(a, m), 0 a < m. (Carter 1971): axially symmetric black holes have only 2 degrees of freedom. (Robinson 1975): Conjecture holds in the case of axially symmetric black holes. (Hawking 1973): Conjecture holds in the case of real-analytic spacetimes.

Main Conjecture Black holes have no hair Conjecture If (M 4, g, T) is regular, non-degenerate, stationary vacuum its domain of outer communication is isometric to the domain of outer communication of a Kerr spacetime K(a, m), 0 a < m. (Carter 1971): axially symmetric black holes have only 2 degrees of freedom. (Robinson 1975): Conjecture holds in the case of axially symmetric black holes. (Hawking 1973): Conjecture holds in the case of real-analytic spacetimes.

Rigidity of Black Holes LOCAL RIGIDITY

Hawking s rigidity theorem Hawking The event horizon of a real analytic, stationary, regular, vacuum spacetime is a Killing horizon, i.e. the space-time admits another Killing field normal to the event horizon Main ideas Follows from the tangency of T to the horizon that there must exist an infinitesimal Killing field normal to the horizon. (Nomizu s Theorem) M real analytic, pseudo-riemannian, simply connected, O M, connected, open. Then any Killing v-field in O extends to a Killing field in M.

Hawking s rigidity theorem Hawking The event horizon of a real analytic, stationary, regular, vacuum spacetime is a Killing horizon, i.e. the space-time admits another Killing field normal to the event horizon Main ideas Follows from the tangency of T to the horizon that there must exist an infinitesimal Killing field normal to the horizon. (Nomizu s Theorem) M real analytic, pseudo-riemannian, simply connected, O M, connected, open. Then any Killing v-field in O extends to a Killing field in M.

Conjecture Important Analyticity should be proved not assumed! Results without analyticity (Ionescu-Kl(2008) ) Conjecture holds provided that a scalar identity is assumed to be satisfied on the bifurcation sphere. ( Alexakis-Ionescu-Kl(2009) ) Conjecture holds provided that the spacetime is assumed to be close to a Kerr spacetime. Both theorems have been extended by Willie Wong and Yu Pin to the case of Einstein-Maxwell equations (Kerr-Newman)

Conjecture Important Analyticity should be proved not assumed! Results without analyticity (Ionescu-Kl(2008) ) Conjecture holds provided that a scalar identity is assumed to be satisfied on the bifurcation sphere. ( Alexakis-Ionescu-Kl(2009) ) Conjecture holds provided that the spacetime is assumed to be close to a Kerr spacetime. Both theorems have been extended by Willie Wong and Yu Pin to the case of Einstein-Maxwell equations (Kerr-Newman)

Conjecture Important Analyticity should be proved not assumed! Results without analyticity (Ionescu-Kl(2008) ) Conjecture holds provided that a scalar identity is assumed to be satisfied on the bifurcation sphere. ( Alexakis-Ionescu-Kl(2009) ) Conjecture holds provided that the spacetime is assumed to be close to a Kerr spacetime. Both theorems have been extended by Willie Wong and Yu Pin to the case of Einstein-Maxwell equations (Kerr-Newman)

Conjecture Important Analyticity should be proved not assumed! Results without analyticity (Ionescu-Kl(2008) ) Conjecture holds provided that a scalar identity is assumed to be satisfied on the bifurcation sphere. ( Alexakis-Ionescu-Kl(2009) ) Conjecture holds provided that the spacetime is assumed to be close to a Kerr spacetime. Both theorems have been extended by Willie Wong and Yu Pin to the case of Einstein-Maxwell equations (Kerr-Newman)

Local Extension (Alexakis Ionescu Kl(2009) Hawking s rigidity theorem is true, locally, in a neighborhood of a non-degenerate bifurcate horizon (Ionescu Kl(2011) Extension of Killing vector-fields fails near points away from the bifurcate sphere of the horizon. Main ideas (Friedrich Racz Wald) Construct the Hawking vector-field K in the domain of dependence of N N. Have [L, K] = cl Extend the vector-field K to a full neighborhood of S by solving a transport equation [L, K] = cl. Show that the extended Kis Killing by a unique continuation argument.

Local Extension (Alexakis Ionescu Kl(2009) Hawking s rigidity theorem is true, locally, in a neighborhood of a non-degenerate bifurcate horizon (Ionescu Kl(2011) Extension of Killing vector-fields fails near points away from the bifurcate sphere of the horizon. Main ideas (Friedrich Racz Wald) Construct the Hawking vector-field K in the domain of dependence of N N. Have [L, K] = cl Extend the vector-field K to a full neighborhood of S by solving a transport equation [L, K] = cl. Show that the extended Kis Killing by a unique continuation argument.

Local Extension (Alexakis Ionescu Kl(2009) Hawking s rigidity theorem is true, locally, in a neighborhood of a non-degenerate bifurcate horizon (Ionescu Kl(2011) Extension of Killing vector-fields fails near points away from the bifurcate sphere of the horizon. Main ideas (Friedrich Racz Wald) Construct the Hawking vector-field K in the domain of dependence of N N. Have [L, K] = cl Extend the vector-field K to a full neighborhood of S by solving a transport equation [L, K] = cl. Show that the extended Kis Killing by a unique continuation argument.

Local Extension (Alexakis Ionescu Kl(2009) Hawking s rigidity theorem is true, locally, in a neighborhood of a non-degenerate bifurcate horizon (Ionescu Kl(2011) Extension of Killing vector-fields fails near points away from the bifurcate sphere of the horizon. Main ideas (Friedrich Racz Wald) Construct the Hawking vector-field K in the domain of dependence of N N. Have [L, K] = cl Extend the vector-field K to a full neighborhood of S by solving a transport equation [L, K] = cl. Show that the extended Kis Killing by a unique continuation argument.

Local Extension (Alexakis Ionescu Kl(2009) Hawking s rigidity theorem is true, locally, in a neighborhood of a non-degenerate bifurcate horizon (Ionescu Kl(2011) Extension of Killing vector-fields fails near points away from the bifurcate sphere of the horizon. Main ideas (Friedrich Racz Wald) Construct the Hawking vector-field K in the domain of dependence of N N. Have [L, K] = cl Extend the vector-field K to a full neighborhood of S by solving a transport equation [L, K] = cl. Show that the extended Kis Killing by a unique continuation argument.

Ionescu-Klainerman(2011) Theorem 1 (M, g) Ricci flat, pseudo-riemannian manifold; (O, Z) verify: A1 There exists a smooth v-field L geodesic in M (D L L = 0), A2 Z Killing v-field in O, [L, Z] = c 0 L. If O is strongly pseudo-convex Z extends as a Killing vector-field to a neighborhood of p. Pseudo-convexity O M is strongly pseudo-convex at p O if it admits defining function f at p, s.t. for any X 0 T p (M), X (f )(p) = 0 and g(x, X ) = 0, we have D 2 f (X, X )(p) < 0.

Ionescu-Klainerman(2011) Theorem 1 (M, g) Ricci flat, pseudo-riemannian manifold; (O, Z) verify: A1 There exists a smooth v-field L geodesic in M (D L L = 0), A2 Z Killing v-field in O, [L, Z] = c 0 L. If O is strongly pseudo-convex Z extends as a Killing vector-field to a neighborhood of p. Pseudo-convexity O M is strongly pseudo-convex at p O if it admits defining function f at p, s.t. for any X 0 T p (M), X (f )(p) = 0 and g(x, X ) = 0, we have D 2 f (X, X )(p) < 0.

Ionescu-Klainerman(2011) Theorem 1 (M, g) Ricci flat, pseudo-riemannian manifold; (O, Z) verify: A1 There exists a smooth v-field L geodesic in M (D L L = 0), A2 Z Killing v-field in O, [L, Z] = c 0 L. If O is strongly pseudo-convex Z extends as a Killing vector-field to a neighborhood of p. Pseudo-convexity O M is strongly pseudo-convex at p O if it admits defining function f at p, s.t. for any X 0 T p (M), X (f )(p) = 0 and g(x, X ) = 0, we have D 2 f (X, X )(p) < 0.

Ionescu-Klainerman(2011) Theorem 1 (M, g) Ricci flat, pseudo-riemannian manifold; (O, Z) verify: A1 There exists a smooth v-field L geodesic in M (D L L = 0), A2 Z Killing v-field in O, [L, Z] = c 0 L. If O is strongly pseudo-convex Z extends as a Killing vector-field to a neighborhood of p. Pseudo-convexity O M is strongly pseudo-convex at p O if it admits defining function f at p, s.t. for any X 0 T p (M), X (f )(p) = 0 and g(x, X ) = 0, we have D 2 f (X, X )(p) < 0.

Ionescu-Klainerman(2011) Theorem 2. (O, Z) as before with O smooth, null hypersurface in a neighborhood of p O. Also c 0 = 0 and L null, transversal to O. There exists U p and a Ricci flat, Lorentz metric, g in U p, such that g = g in O U p, but Z does not admit an extension as a smooth Killing vector-field for g in U p. Main Idea Construct a null hypersurface transversal to N and solve a characteristic Cauchy problem.

Ionescu-Klainerman(2011) Theorem 2. (O, Z) as before with O smooth, null hypersurface in a neighborhood of p O. Also c 0 = 0 and L null, transversal to O. There exists U p and a Ricci flat, Lorentz metric, g in U p, such that g = g in O U p, but Z does not admit an extension as a smooth Killing vector-field for g in U p. Main Idea Construct a null hypersurface transversal to N and solve a characteristic Cauchy problem.

Ionescu-Klainerman(2011) Theorem 2. (O, Z) as before with O smooth, null hypersurface in a neighborhood of p O. Also c 0 = 0 and L null, transversal to O. There exists U p and a Ricci flat, Lorentz metric, g in U p, such that g = g in O U p, but Z does not admit an extension as a smooth Killing vector-field for g in U p. Main Idea Construct a null hypersurface transversal to N and solve a characteristic Cauchy problem.

Main ideas of Theorem 1 Define π αβ := (L K g) αβ W αβµν := (L K R) αβµν (B R) αβµν. Prove a system of wave/transport equations of the form g W = M(W, DW, π, Dπ), D L π = M(W, DW, π, Dπ), D L (Dπ) = M(W, DW, π, Dπ). Use a unique continuation argument to conclude that W, π vanish in a neighborhood of Z. Role of pseudo-convexity

Main ideas of Theorem 1 Define π αβ := (L K g) αβ W αβµν := (L K R) αβµν (B R) αβµν. Prove a system of wave/transport equations of the form g W = M(W, DW, π, Dπ), D L π = M(W, DW, π, Dπ), D L (Dπ) = M(W, DW, π, Dπ). Use a unique continuation argument to conclude that W, π vanish in a neighborhood of Z. Role of pseudo-convexity

Main ideas of Theorem 1 Define π αβ := (L K g) αβ W αβµν := (L K R) αβµν (B R) αβµν. Prove a system of wave/transport equations of the form g W = M(W, DW, π, Dπ), D L π = M(W, DW, π, Dπ), D L (Dπ) = M(W, DW, π, Dπ). Use a unique continuation argument to conclude that W, π vanish in a neighborhood of Z. Role of pseudo-convexity

Rigidity of Black Holes GLOBAL RESULTS

Unique continuation in Kerr Theorem (Ionescu Kl) Assume W, A, B, C verify { g W = A W + B DW ; L T W = C W, in a Kerr space K(a, m), 0 a < m. Unique continuation holds across the level sets of h if the following T-conditional pseudo-convexity property holds: T(h) = 0; X α X β D α D β h < 0 if X α X α = X (h) = X α T α = 0. The function h = r, in the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates, verifies it.

Conjecture Important Analyticity should be proved not assumed! Results without analyticity (Ionescu-Kl(2008) ) Conjecture holds provided that a scalar identity is assumed to be satisfied on the bifurcation sphere. ( Alexakis-Ionescu-Kl(2009) ) Conjecture holds provided that the spacetime is assumed to be close to a Kerr spacetime. Both theorems have been extended by Willie Wong and Yu Pi to the case of Einstein-Maxwell equations (Kerr-Newman)

Ionescu-Kl(2008) Strategy Want a tensor S, analogous to the Riemann tensor R, It describes locally the Kerr spaces, It satisfies a suitable geometric equation of the form g S = A S + B DS. Mars-Simon tensor Given a stationary space-time (M 4, g, T). S αβµν = R αβµν + 6(1 σ) 1( F αβ F µν 1 3 F 2 I αβµν ). complex, self-dual Weyl field verifying D ρ S ραµν = 6(1 σ) 1 T β S βργλ (F α ρ δ γ µδ λ ν (2/3)F γλ I α ρ µν ).

Mars-Simon tensor Killing 2 form F αβ = D α T β, F = F + if Ernst 1-form σ µ = 2T α F αµ, Ernst potential D µ σ = σ µ, σ 1 at asymptotic infinity. Mars Simon tensor S αβµν = R αβµν + 6(1 σ) 1( F αβ F µν 1 3 F 2 ) I αβµν. D ρ S ραµν = 6(1 σ) 1 T β S βργλ (F α ρ δ γ µδ λ ν (2/3)F γλ I α ρ µν ). Thus it satisfies a wave equation of the form g S α1...α 4 = S β1...β 4 A α1...α 4 β 1...β 4 + D µ S β1...β 4 B α1...α 4 µβ 1...β 4.

Mars-Simon tensor Killing 2 form F αβ = D α T β, F = F + if Ernst 1-form σ µ = 2T α F αµ, Ernst potential D µ σ = σ µ, σ 1 at asymptotic infinity. Mars Simon tensor S αβµν = R αβµν + 6(1 σ) 1( F αβ F µν 1 3 F 2 ) I αβµν. D ρ S ραµν = 6(1 σ) 1 T β S βργλ (F α ρ δ γ µδ λ ν (2/3)F γλ I α ρ µν ). Thus it satisfies a wave equation of the form g S α1...α 4 = S β1...β 4 A α1...α 4 β 1...β 4 + D µ S β1...β 4 B α1...α 4 µβ 1...β 4.

Main results Ionescu-Kl(2008) The domain of outer communication E of a regular stationary vacuum (M, g, T) is locally isometric to the domain of outer communication of a Kerr spacetime, provided that the identity 4m 2 F 2 = (1 σ) 4 holds on the bifurcation sphere S 0. Kerr σ = 1 2m r + ia cos θ, F 2 4m 2 = (r + ia cos θ) 4.

Main results Alexakis Ionescu Kl The domain of outer communication E of a regular stationary vacuum (M, g, T) is isometric to the domain of outer communication of a Kerr spacetime, provided that the smallness condition (1 σ)s(t, e α, e β, e γ ) ε holds along a Cauchy hypersurface in E, for some sufficiently small ε. Main idea Extend a Killing vector-field across a T-conditional pseudoconvex hypersurface in an Einstein vacuum, using a unique continuation argument for a system of wave equations coupled with transport equations.