Non-homogeneous random walks on a semi-infinite strip Chak Hei Lo Joint work with Andrew R. Wade World Congress in Probability and Statistics 11th July, 2016
Outline Motivation: Lamperti s problem Our Model Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Classification of the random walk Assumptions Main results Constant drift Lamperti drift Generalized Lamperti drift Examples: Correlated random walks
Motivation: Lamperti s problem Let X n be a nearest neighbour random walk on Z +.
Motivation: Lamperti s problem Let X n be a nearest neighbour random walk on Z +. Denote the mean drift at x by µ(x).
Motivation: Lamperti s problem Let X n be a nearest neighbour random walk on Z +. Denote the mean drift at x by µ(x). Lamperti s problem: µ(x) = O(1/x) when x.
Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Let S be a finite non-empty set.
Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Let S be a finite non-empty set. Let Σ be a subset of R + S that is locally finite, i.e., Σ ([0, r] S) is finite for all r R +.
Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Let S be a finite non-empty set. Let Σ be a subset of R + S that is locally finite, i.e., Σ ([0, r] S) is finite for all r R +. E.g. Σ = Z + S.
Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Let S be a finite non-empty set. Let Σ be a subset of R + S that is locally finite, i.e., Σ ([0, r] S) is finite for all r R +. E.g. Σ = Z + S. Define for each k S the line Λ k := {x R + : (x, k) Σ}.
Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Let S be a finite non-empty set. Let Σ be a subset of R + S that is locally finite, i.e., Σ ([0, r] S) is finite for all r R +. E.g. Σ = Z + S. Define for each k S the line Λ k := {x R + : (x, k) Σ}. Suppose that for each k S the line Λ k is unbounded.
Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Suppose that (X n, η n ), n Z +, is a time-homogeneous, irreducible Markov chain on Σ, a locally finite subset of R + S.
Non-homogeneous RW on semi-infinite strip Suppose that (X n, η n ), n Z +, is a time-homogeneous, irreducible Markov chain on Σ, a locally finite subset of R + S. Neither coordinate is assumed to be Markov.
Motivating examples We can view S as a set of internal states, influencing motion on the lines R +. E.g., Operations research: modulated queues (S = states of server)
Motivating examples We can view S as a set of internal states, influencing motion on the lines R +. E.g., Operations research: modulated queues (S = states of server) Economics: regime-switching processes (S contains market information)
Motivating examples We can view S as a set of internal states, influencing motion on the lines R +. E.g., Operations research: modulated queues (S = states of server) Economics: regime-switching processes (S contains market information) Physics: physical processes with internal degrees of freedom (S = energy/momentum states of particle)
Classification of the random walk Recall (X n, η n ) is a time-homogeneous irreducible Markov chain on the state-space Σ R + S. (i) If (X n, η n ) is transient, then X n a.s. (ii) If (X n, η n ) is recurrent, then P(X n A i.o.) = 1 for any bounded region A. (iii) Define τ = min{n 0 : X n A}. If (X n, η n ) is positive-recurrent, then E[τ] < for any bounded region A. (iv) If (X n, η n ) is recurrent but not positive recurrent, then we call it null-recurrent.
Assumptions Moments bound on jumps of X n (B p ) C p < s.t. E[ X n+1 X n p (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] C p
Assumptions Moments bound on jumps of X n (B p ) C p < s.t. E[ X n+1 X n p (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] C p Notation for moments of the displacements in the X -coordinate µ i (x) = E[X n+1 X n (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] σ i (x) = E[(X n+1 X n ) 2 (X n, η n ) = (x, i)]
Assumptions (cont.) η n is close to being Markov when X n is large Define q ij (x) = P[η n+1 = j (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (Q ) q ij = lim x q ij (x) exists for all i, j S and (q ij ) is irreducible
Assumptions (cont.) η n is close to being Markov when X n is large Define q ij (x) = P[η n+1 = j (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (Q ) q ij = lim x q ij (x) exists for all i, j S and (q ij ) is irreducible Let π be the unique stationary distribution on S corresponding to (q ij ).
Constant drift Constant-type moment condition (M C ) d i R for all i S such that µ i (x) = d i + o(1).
Constant drift
Constant drift
Constant drift
Constant drift
Recurrence classification for constant drift The following theorem is from Georgiou, Wade (2014), extending slightly earlier work of Malyshev (1972), Falin (1988), and Fayolle et al (1995). Theorem Suppose that (B p ) holds for some p > 1 and conditions (Q ) and (M C ) hold. The following sufficient conditions apply. If i S d iπ i > 0, then (X n, η n ) is transient. If i S d iπ i < 0, then (X n, η n ) is positive-recurrent. where π i is the unique stationary distribution on S. What about i S d iπ i = 0?
Different drifts (i) i S d iπ i 0, constant drift: µ i (x) = d i + o(1) (ii) i S d iπ i = 0 and d i = 0 for all i, Lamperti drift: µ i (x) = c i x + o(x 1 ) σ i (x) = s 2 i + o(1) (iii) i S d iπ i = 0 and d i 0 for some i, generalized Lamperti drift: µ i (x) = d i + c i x + o(x 1 ) σ i (x) = si 2 + o(1)
Lamperti drift Lamperti-type moment conditions (M L ) c i, s i R for all i S (at least one s i nonzero) such that µ i (x) = c i x + o(x 1 ); σ i (x) = s 2 i + o(1).
Lamperti drift Lamperti-type moment conditions (M L ) c i, s i R for all i S (at least one s i nonzero) such that µ i (x) = c i x + o(x 1 ); σ i (x) = s 2 i + o(1). When S is a singleton, this reduces to the classical Lamperti problem on R +.
Lamperti drift
Lamperti drift
Lamperti drift
Lamperti drift
Recurrence classification for Lamperti drift Theorem (Georgiou, Wade, 2014) Suppose that (B p ) holds for some p > 2 and conditions (Q ) and (M L ) hold. The following sufficient conditions apply. (i) If i S (2c i s 2 i )π i > 0, then (X n, η n ) is transient. (ii) If i S 2c iπ i < i S s2 i π i, then (X n, η n ) is null-recurrent. (iii) If i S (2c i + s 2 i )π i < 0, then (X n, η n ) is positive-recurrent. [With better error bounds in (Q ) and (M L ) we can also show that the boundary cases are null-recurrent.]
Idea of proof of the theorem Our general analysis is based on the Lyapunov function f ν : Σ R defined for ν R by where b i R. f ν (x, i) := x ν + ν 2 b ix ν 2
Idea of proof of the theorem Our general analysis is based on the Lyapunov function f ν : Σ R defined for ν R by where b i R. f ν (x, i) := x ν + ν 2 b ix ν 2 For appropriate choices of ν, and selecting the right b i depending on the drift and the stationary distribution, we can show that f ν (X n, η n ) is a supermartingale and so we can apply some semi-martingale theorem. Hence we obtain the last theorem shown.
Generalized Lamperti drift Generalized Lamperti type moment conditions Define µ ij (x) = E[(X n+1 X n )1{η n+1 = j} (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (M CL ) There exist d i R, c i R, d ij R and si 2 R +, with at least one si 2 non-zero, such that all of the following is satisfied,
Generalized Lamperti drift Generalized Lamperti type moment conditions Define µ ij (x) = E[(X n+1 X n )1{η n+1 = j} (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (M CL ) There exist d i R, c i R, d ij R and si 2 R +, with at least one si 2 non-zero, such that all of the following is satisfied, (i) For all i S, µ i (x) = d i + c i x + o(x 1 ) as x,
Generalized Lamperti drift Generalized Lamperti type moment conditions Define µ ij (x) = E[(X n+1 X n )1{η n+1 = j} (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (M CL ) There exist d i R, c i R, d ij R and si 2 R +, with at least one si 2 non-zero, such that all of the following is satisfied, (i) For all i S, µ i (x) = d i + c i x + o(x 1 ) as x, (ii) For all i, j S, µ ij (x) = d ij + o(1) as x,
Generalized Lamperti drift Generalized Lamperti type moment conditions Define µ ij (x) = E[(X n+1 X n )1{η n+1 = j} (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (M CL ) There exist d i R, c i R, d ij R and si 2 R +, with at least one si 2 non-zero, such that all of the following is satisfied, (i) For all i S, µ i (x) = d i + c i x + o(x 1 ) as x, (ii) For all i, j S, µ ij (x) = d ij + o(1) as x, (iii) σ i (x) = si 2 + o(1),
Generalized Lamperti drift Generalized Lamperti type moment conditions Define µ ij (x) = E[(X n+1 X n )1{η n+1 = j} (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (M CL ) There exist d i R, c i R, d ij R and si 2 R +, with at least one si 2 non-zero, such that all of the following is satisfied, (i) For all i S, µ i (x) = d i + c i x + o(x 1 ) as x, (ii) For all i, j S, µ ij (x) = d ij + o(1) as x, (iii) σ i (x) = si 2 + o(1), (iv) i S π id i = 0.
Generalized Lamperti drift Generalized Lamperti type moment conditions Define µ ij (x) = E[(X n+1 X n )1{η n+1 = j} (X n, η n ) = (x, i)] (M CL ) There exist d i R, c i R, d ij R and si 2 R +, with at least one si 2 non-zero, such that all of the following is satisfied, (i) For all i S, µ i (x) = d i + c i x + o(x 1 ) as x, (ii) For all i, j S, µ ij (x) = d ij + o(1) as x, (iii) σ i (x) = si 2 + o(1), (iv) i S π id i = 0. Transition probability condition (Q CL ) There exist γ ij R, such that q ij (x) = q ij + γ ij x + o(x 1 )
Generalized Lamperti drift
Generalized Lamperti drift
Recurrence classification for Generalized Lamperti drift Theorem (L., Wade, 2015) Suppose that (B p ) holds for some p > 2, and conditions (Q ), (Q CL ) and (M CL ) hold. Define a i to be the unique solution up to translation of the system of equations d i + j S (a j a i )q ij = 0 i S. The following sufficient conditions apply. If i S [2c i si 2 + 2 j S a j(γ ij d ij )]π i > 0 then (X n, η n ) is transient. If i S (2c i + 2 j S a jγ ij )π i < i S (s2 i + 2 j S a jd ij )π i then (X n, η n ) is null-recurrent. If i S [2c i + si 2 + 2 j S a j(γ ij + d ij )]π i < 0 then (X n, η n ) is positive-recurrent.
Idea of proof of the theorem Transform the process (X n, η n ) with generalized Lamperti drift to a process ( X n, η n ) = (X n + a ηn, η n )
Idea of proof of the theorem Transform the process (X n, η n ) with generalized Lamperti drift to a process ( X n, η n ) = (X n + a ηn, η n ) Find the appropriate choices of the real numbers a i, i S, such that ( X n, η n ) has Lamperti drift i.e., the constant components of the drifts are eliminated
Idea of proof of the theorem Transform the process (X n, η n ) with generalized Lamperti drift to a process ( X n, η n ) = (X n + a ηn, η n ) Find the appropriate choices of the real numbers a i, i S, such that ( X n, η n ) has Lamperti drift i.e., the constant components of the drifts are eliminated Calculate the new increment moment estimates for the transformed process ( X n, η n ).
Idea of proof of the theorem Transform the process (X n, η n ) with generalized Lamperti drift to a process ( X n, η n ) = (X n + a ηn, η n ) Find the appropriate choices of the real numbers a i, i S, such that ( X n, η n ) has Lamperti drift i.e., the constant components of the drifts are eliminated Calculate the new increment moment estimates for the transformed process ( X n, η n ). Apply the results in the Lamperti drift case
Summary of cases
Summary of cases
Example: One-step Correlated random walk
Simulation results on One-step Correlated RW
Simulation results on One-step Correlated RW
Example: Two-steps Correlated random walk
Simulation results on Two-steps Correlated RW
Simulation results on Two-step Correlated RW
Simulation results on Two-steps Correlated RW
Existence and Non-existence of Moments results We also obtained some quantitative information on the nature of recurrence. We studied moments of passage times.
Existence and Non-existence of Moments results We also obtained some quantitative information on the nature of recurrence. We studied moments of passage times. For x R +, define the stopping time τ x := min{n 0 : X n x}.
Existence and Non-existence of Moments results We also obtained some quantitative information on the nature of recurrence. We studied moments of passage times. For x R +, define the stopping time τ x := min{n 0 : X n x}. We got results that gives conditions for which s such that E[τ s x ] exists or not exists.
Existence and Non-existence of Moments results We also obtained some quantitative information on the nature of recurrence. We studied moments of passage times. For x R +, define the stopping time τ x := min{n 0 : X n x}. We got results that gives conditions for which s such that E[τ s x ] exists or not exists. We used similar techniques and ideas in our proofs.
References L., A. R. Wade, Non-homogeneous random walks on a half strip with generalized Lamperti drifts, http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.04242 G. I. Falin, Ergodicity of random walks in the half-strip, Math. Notes 44 (1988) 606 608; translated from Mat. Zametki 44 (1988) 225 230 [in Russian]. G. Fayolle, V. A. Malyshev, and M. V. Menshikov, Topics in the Constructive Theory of Countable Markov Chains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. N. Georgiou and A. R. Wade, Non-homogeneous random walks on a semi-infinite strip, Stoch. Process. Appl. 124 (2014) 3179 3205. J. Lamperti, Criteria for the recurrence and transience of stochastic processes I, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1 (1960) 314 330. V. A. Malyshev, Homogeneous random walks on the product of finite set and a halfline, pp. 5 13 in Veroyatnostnye Metody Issledovania (Probability Methods of Investigation) 41 [in Russian], ed. A.N. Kolmogorov, Moscow State University, Moscow, 1972.