RUPOK An Online Risk Tool for Road Network. Michal Bíl, Jan Kubeček, Rostislav Vodák

Similar documents
GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Technical note on seasonal adjustment for M0

1. INTRODUCTION. EXAMPLE OF SECHILIENNE ROCKFALL (France)

Hazard assessment based on radar-based rainfall nowcasts at European scale The HAREN project

UNCLASSIFIED. Environment, Safety and Health (ESH) Report

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

A More Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment: Flood Damage in Virginia Beach

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Impacts of climate change on flooding in the river Meuse

Climatography of the United States No

Computing & Telecommunications Services

Integrating Weather Forecasts into Folsom Reservoir Operations

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report January CaTS Help Desk. Wright State University (937)

FORECAST-BASED OPERATIONS AT FOLSOM DAM AND LAKE

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Prairie Climate Centre Prairie Climate Atlas. Visualizing Climate Change Projections for the Canadian Prairie Provinces

Climatography of the United States No

In Centre, Online Classroom Live and Online Classroom Programme Prices

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

End-To-End Approach in Early Warning: The Hong Kong Experience

Climatography of the United States No

TMC Monthly Operational Summary

Time Series Analysis

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Euro-indicators Working Group

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

Climatography of the United States No

Public Disclosure Copy

Climatography of the United States No

Integrated and Multi-Hazard Disaster Management

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

TMC Monthly Operational Summary

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Effects of climate change on landslide frequencies in landslide prone districts in Sri Lanka; Overview

In Issue of International Sabo News Letter

Average 175, , , , , , ,046 YTD Total 1,098,649 1,509,593 1,868,795 1,418, ,169 1,977,225 2,065,321

Average 175, , , , , , ,940 YTD Total 944,460 1,284,944 1,635,177 1,183, ,954 1,744,134 1,565,640

The AIR Severe Thunderstorm Model for the United States

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

Crop Monitoring in Europe WINTER CEREAL HARDENING IS PROGRESSING WELL. MARS BULLETIN Vol.20 No.12 (2012)

Involvement of the Geological Survey of Slovenia in the field of natural hazard risk management

JRC MARS Bulletin Crop monitoring in Europe January 2016 Weakly hardened winter cereals

How are adding integers and subtracting integers related? Work with a partner. Use integer counters to find 4 2. Remove 2 positive counters.

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

Winter Season Resource Adequacy Analysis Status Report

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

Statistical Models for Rainfall with Applications to Index Insura

AASHTO Rigid Pavement Design

ISO Lead Auditor Lean Six Sigma PMP Business Process Improvement Enterprise Risk Management IT Sales Training

Jayalath Ekanayake Jonas Tappolet Harald Gall Abraham Bernstein. Time variance and defect prediction in software projects: additional figures

2015 Fall Conditions Report

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MILITARY SURFACE DEPLOYMENT AND DISTRIBUTION COMMAND (SDDC) 1 SOLDIER WAY SCOTT AFB, IL 62225

FEB DASHBOARD FEB JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

Safety effects of lower speed limits during winter months

Science Standard 1: Students analyze monthly precipitation and temperature records, displayed in bar charts, collected in metric units (mm).

The AIR Severe Thunderstorm Model for Europe

Transcription:

RUPOK An Online Risk Tool for Road Network Michal Bíl, Jan Kubeček, Rostislav Vodák

RUPOK Online application Interactive webmap Spatial database Includes Hazards, Vulnerabilities, Risks List of critical infrastructures

RUPOK

A spatial database of road traffic interruptions Data on road traffic incidents Police Road administrators External systems Xml HTTP POST export The Integrated Traffic Information System for the Czech Republic Filters (works automatically) RUPOK (www.rupok.cz) CLIENT Spatial database

No. of interrupted road links Online data on traffic incidents We are able to monitor hazardous processes today Spatial databases provide online data on road closures Animation June 2013 flood Data source: NDIC Jan Feb Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013 June 2013 flood

Computation of natural hazards along roads Combined Floods Landslides Snow

Computation of natural hazards along roads Combined Floods Landslides Snow

RUPOK - vulnerabilities DIRECT COSTS Motorway Costs in CZK Local road

RUPOK - vulnerabilities INDIRECT COSTS Detour time

RUPOK - vulnerabilities INDIRECT COSTS Traffic intensities

Cause of a road blockage RUPOK: Spatial database of road network interruptions (1997 - present)

Landslide hazard on transportation links is directly related to A Exposure (spatial information from the official landslide database) B Recorded landslides (real events new traffic interruptions recorded by road administrators) C Regional landslide susceptibility (expert involved) D The road / railway link length

Exposure of transportation networks to landslides A Portion of road and railway sections within a landslide zone to all sections in the district [%] Roads Railways More than 50 % of transportation links in a given area are closer than 50 m to a landslide The values based on data from the spatial landslide database administered by the Czech Geological Survey

B Recorded landslides using online messages

Regions with higher susceptibility to landsliding C Geo-located data on traffic interruptions due to landsliding 7 Landslide susceptibility values as stated by an expert 1 5 Records within the red areas Landslides usually took place on natural slopes Records outside the red areas Landslides usually took place on road or railway embankments or rockfalls 10 Area with the highest landslide susceptibility

Transportation link length matters D The longer is a road link the higher is the landslide hazard (probability of a landslide occurrence along a link increases) The higher hazard due to the longer road link % % Road length: 13.6 km Road length: 6.7 km

Computation of natural hazards along roads A+B+C+D What is the probability of at least one traffic interruption caused by a landslide over the next year?

Visualization of landslide hazard along roads Generalized level Detailed level www.rupok.cz

Distribution of landslide hazard along roads for 3 periods Approx. 99 % of all road links The impacts of 1997 event

How reliable are the landslide hazard values? Landslide hazard will decrease over the following period Traffic interruptions are related to computed landslide hazard These links were not interrupted Underestimated landslide hazard (hazard close to 0, but the road interrupted twice)

Examples of landslide hazard

Landslide hazard values for 3 periods (1st 1997 2002, 2nd 2003 2008, 3rd 2009 2014) Landslide hazard (%) Very low hazard, but a landslide occurred in the 3 rd period One landslide recorded No exposure to landslides The lowest regional landslide susceptibility (1) Very short road link A landslide occurred at an artificial slope

Landslide hazard values for 3 periods (1st 1997 2002, 2nd 2003 2008, 3rd 2009 2014) Landslide hazard (%) Medium and constant hazard Three landslides recorded No exposure to landslides The lowest regional landslide susceptibility (1) Long road link Rockfalls on steep slopes above the road

Landslide hazard values for 3 periods (1st 1997 2002, 2nd 2003 2008, 3rd 2009 2014) Landslide hazard (%) High but decreasing hazard Spatial data on landslides (official database) Two landslides recorded only within the 1 st period Road exposed to landslides The highest regional landslide susceptibility (10) Long road link

Issues related to state-wide landslide hazard computation State-wide coverage, but low detail (computations based on spatial data, no field works) Source of landsliding: natural or artificial slopes An automated system of traffic blockage data relies on filters which expect correctly written messages (some messages are not then received) Hazard values can be affected by one isolated extreme event

Summary A state-wide spatial database of road and railway traffic interruptions due to landsliding (RUPOK.CZ) Landslide hazard was computed for the entire Czech transportation network Data uncertainty even low landslide hazard does not mean that landsliding cannot occur at such places Transportation network administrators should be prepared for traffic blockages and should therefore focus on network resilience improvement as preventive measures

Related publications Andrášik, R., Bíl, M., Slovák, R. (2016). How (not) to work with small probabilities: Evaluating the individual risk of railway transport. Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice Proceedings of the 26th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2016. 672 676 Bíl, M., Andrášik, R., Zahradníček, P., Kubeček, J., Sedoník, J., Štěpánek, P. (2016). Total water content thresholds for shallow landslides, Outer Western Carpathians. Landslides 13, 337 347. Bíl, M., Vodák, R., Kubeček, J., Bílová, M., Sedoník, J., (2015): Evaluating Road Network Damage Caused by Natural Disasters in the Czech Republic between 1997 and 2010. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 80, 90 103. Vodák, R., Bíl, M., Sedoník, J. (2015). Network robustness and random processes. Physica A 428, 368 382. Bíl, M., Kubeček, J., Andrášik, R., (2014): An Epidemiological Approach to Determining the Risk of Road Damage due to Landslides. Nat Haz. 73 (4), 1323 1335.

Related publications

Thank you RUPOK.CZ Questions? Michal Bíl michal.bil@cdv.cz