Improved Estimation of Rare Sensitive Attribute in a Stratified Sampling Using Poisson Distribution

Similar documents
On stratified randomized response sampling

Estimating the Population Mean using Stratified Double Ranked Set Sample

Extension of Mangat Randomized Response Model

A New Mixed Randomized Response Model

An Improved Warner s Randomized Response Model

Element sampling: Part 2

ALLOCATING SAMPLE TO STRATA PROPORTIONAL TO AGGREGATE MEASURE OF SIZE WITH BOTH UPPER AND LOWER BOUNDS ON THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN EACH STRATUM

Estimation of Population Mean Using Co-Efficient of Variation and Median of an Auxiliary Variable

Improved Class of Ratio -Cum- Product Estimators of Finite Population Mean in two Phase Sampling

Objectives and Use of Stratification in Sample Design

Abstract. Ranked set sampling, auxiliary variable, variance.

LECTURE 2 LEAST SQUARES CROSS-VALIDATION FOR KERNEL DENSITY ESTIMATION

Double Stage Shrinkage Estimator of Two Parameters. Generalized Exponential Distribution

MINIMUM VARIANCE STRATIFICATION FOR COMPROMISE ALLOCATION

7-1. Chapter 4. Part I. Sampling Distributions and Confidence Intervals

A General Family of Estimators for Estimating Population Variance Using Known Value of Some Population Parameter(s)

Random Variables, Sampling and Estimation

Modified Ratio Estimators Using Known Median and Co-Efficent of Kurtosis

Chain ratio-to-regression estimators in two-phase sampling in the presence of non-response

Uniformly Consistency of the Cauchy-Transformation Kernel Density Estimation Underlying Strong Mixing

Estimation of the Population Mean in Presence of Non-Response

Estimation for Complete Data

Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence

Chapter 22. Comparing Two Proportions. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

Varanasi , India. Corresponding author

STA Learning Objectives. Population Proportions. Module 10 Comparing Two Proportions. Upon completing this module, you should be able to:

Simple Random Sampling!

Econ 325 Notes on Point Estimator and Confidence Interval 1 By Hiro Kasahara

Nonparametric regression: minimax upper and lower bounds

Lecture 3. Properties of Summary Statistics: Sampling Distribution

Inferential Statistics. Inference Process. Inferential Statistics and Probability a Holistic Approach. Inference Process.

Understanding Samples

Discrete Mathematics for CS Spring 2008 David Wagner Note 22

A statistical method to determine sample size to estimate characteristic value of soil parameters

Output Analysis (2, Chapters 10 &11 Law)

FACULTY OF MATHEMATICAL STUDIES MATHEMATICS FOR PART I ENGINEERING. Lectures

Chapter 22. Comparing Two Proportions. Copyright 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.

Direction: This test is worth 250 points. You are required to complete this test within 50 minutes.

Stratified Random Sampling Summary Notes in Progress

Developing Efficient Ratio and Product Type Exponential Estimators of Population Mean under Two Phase Sampling for Stratification

On Exact Finite-Difference Scheme for Numerical Solution of Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations.

Some Exponential Ratio-Product Type Estimators using information on Auxiliary Attributes under Second Order Approximation

Estimation of Gumbel Parameters under Ranked Set Sampling

It should be unbiased, or approximately unbiased. Variance of the variance estimator should be small. That is, the variance estimator is stable.

A quick activity - Central Limit Theorem and Proportions. Lecture 21: Testing Proportions. Results from the GSS. Statistics and the General Population

GUIDELINES ON REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLING

Statistical Inference (Chapter 10) Statistical inference = learn about a population based on the information provided by a sample.

Finite Difference Method for the Estimation of a Heat Source Dependent on Time Variable ABSTRACT

KLMED8004 Medical statistics. Part I, autumn Estimation. We have previously learned: Population and sample. New questions

ON LOCAL LINEAR ESTIMATION IN NONPARAMETRIC ERRORS-IN-VARIABLES MODELS 1

Table 12.1: Contingency table. Feature b. 1 N 11 N 12 N 1b 2 N 21 N 22 N 2b. ... a N a1 N a2 N ab

Topic 9: Sampling Distributions of Estimators

Jambulingam Subramani 1, Gnanasegaran Kumarapandiyan 2 and Saminathan Balamurali 3

Chapter 8: STATISTICAL INTERVALS FOR A SINGLE SAMPLE. Part 3: Summary of CI for µ Confidence Interval for a Population Proportion p

Properties and Hypothesis Testing

Sample Size Determination (Two or More Samples)

G. R. Pasha Department of Statistics Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan

Sampling, Sampling Distribution and Normality

AAEC/ECON 5126 FINAL EXAM: SOLUTIONS

Lecture 12: September 27

TABLES AND FORMULAS FOR MOORE Basic Practice of Statistics

Topic 9: Sampling Distributions of Estimators

Sampling Error. Chapter 6 Student Lecture Notes 6-1. Business Statistics: A Decision-Making Approach, 6e. Chapter Goals

Scientific Research of the Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science

4 Conditional Distribution Estimation

Alternative Ratio Estimator of Population Mean in Simple Random Sampling

A New Hybrid in the Nonlinear Part of Adomian Decomposition Method for Initial Value Problem of Ordinary Differential Equation

EECS564 Estimation, Filtering, and Detection Hwk 2 Solns. Winter p θ (z) = (2θz + 1 θ), 0 z 1

Exponential Families and Bayesian Inference

Estimation of a population proportion March 23,

An Introduction to Randomized Algorithms

Stability analysis of numerical methods for stochastic systems with additive noise

Statistics 511 Additional Materials

Basis for simulation techniques

In this section we derive some finite-sample properties of the OLS estimator. b is an estimator of β. It is a function of the random sample data.

1.010 Uncertainty in Engineering Fall 2008

Celestin Chameni Nembua University of YaoundéII, Cameroon. Abstract

A Family of Unbiased Estimators of Population Mean Using an Auxiliary Variable

Agreement of CI and HT. Lecture 13 - Tests of Proportions. Example - Waiting Times

The Sampling Distribution of the Maximum. Likelihood Estimators for the Parameters of. Beta-Binomial Distribution

On the convergence, consistence and stability of a standard finite difference scheme

Lecture 6 Chi Square Distribution (χ 2 ) and Least Squares Fitting

Let us give one more example of MLE. Example 3. The uniform distribution U[0, θ] on the interval [0, θ] has p.d.f.

MATH 320: Probability and Statistics 9. Estimation and Testing of Parameters. Readings: Pruim, Chapter 4

Statistical inference: example 1. Inferential Statistics

Expectation and Variance of a random variable

ON POINTWISE BINOMIAL APPROXIMATION

Journal of Scientific Research Vol. 62, 2018 : Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi ISSN :

AClassofRegressionEstimatorwithCumDualProductEstimatorAsIntercept

SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING FOR NON-LINEAR TREND IN MILK YIELD DATA

MBACATÓLICA. Quantitative Methods. Faculdade de Ciências Económicas e Empresariais UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA PORTUGUESA 9. SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS

Introducing Sample Proportions

Review Questions, Chapters 8, 9. f(y) = 0, elsewhere. F (y) = f Y(1) = n ( e y/θ) n 1 1 θ e y/θ = n θ e yn

1 Inferential Methods for Correlation and Regression Analysis

Lecture 6 Chi Square Distribution (χ 2 ) and Least Squares Fitting

Lecture 7: Properties of Random Samples

Topic 9: Sampling Distributions of Estimators

Use of Auxiliary Information for Estimating Population Mean in Systematic Sampling under Non- Response

Lecture 9: Regression: Regressogram and Kernel Regression

Unbiased Estimation. February 7-12, 2008

Transcription:

Ope Joural of Statistics, 06, 6, 85-95 Publised Olie February 06 i SciRes ttp://wwwscirporg/joural/ojs ttp://dxdoiorg/0436/ojs0660 Improved Estimatio of Rare Sesitive ttribute i a Stratified Samplig Usig Poisso Distributio bdul Wakeel, Masood war Departmet of Matematics, COMSTS Istitute of Iformatio Tecology, Islamabad, Pakista Received December 05; accepted 0 February 06; publised 3 February 06 Copyrigt 06 by autors ad Scietific Researc Publisig Ic Tis work is licesed uder te Creative Commos ttributio Iteratioal icese CC BY ttp://creativecommosorg/liceses/by/40/ bstract I tis study, we propose a two stage radomized respose model Improved ubiased estimators of te mea umber of persos possessig a rare sesitive attribute uder two differet situatios are proposed Te proposed estimators are evaluated usig a relative efficiecy compariso It is sow tat our estimators are efficiet as compared to existig estimators we te parameter of rare urelated attribute is kow ad i ukow case, depedig o te probability of selectig a questio Keywords Poisso Distributio, Rare Sesitive ttribute, Rare Urelated ttribute, Stratified Samplig Itroductio Te collectio of data troug direct questioig o rare sesitive issues suc as extramarital affairs, family disturbaces ad declarig religious affiliatio i extremism coditio is far-reacig issue Warer [] itroduced te radomized respose procedure to procure trustworty data for estimatig π, te proportio of respodets i te populatio belogig to te sesitive group Greeberg et al [] suggested a urelated questio radomized respose model i wic eac idividual selected i te samples was asked to reply yes or o to oe of two statemets: a Do you belog to Group? b Do you belog to Group Y? wit respective probabilities P ad P Secod questio asked i te samplig does ot ave ay effect o te first questio Greeberg et al [] cosidered π ad π Y te proportio of persos possessig sesitive ad urelated caracteristic respectively ad discussed bot te cases we π was kow ad ukow Te probability of yes Y How to cite tis paper: Wakeel, ad war, M 06 Improved Estimatio of Rare Sesitive ttribute i a Stratified Samplig Usig Poisso Distributio Ope Joural of Statistics, 6, 85-95 ttp://dxdoiorg/0436/ojs0660

Wakeel, M war resposes 0 θ0 = Pπ + P πy Magat ad Sig [3] proposed a two stage radomized respose procedure wic required te use of two radomizatio devices Te radom device R cosists of two statemets amely a I belog to te sesitive group, ad b Go to radom device R, wit probabilities T ad T respectively Te radom device R wic uses two statemets a I belog to te sesitive group, ad b I do ot belog to te sesitive group wit kow probabilities P ad P respectively Te θ 0, te probability of yes resposes is θ0 = Tπ + T { Pπ + P π } ater o, differet modificatios ave bee made to improve te metodology for collectio of iformatio Some of tem are ee et al [4], Cauduri ad Mukerjee [5], Mamood et al [6], ad et al [7], Bargava ad Sig [8] ad et al [7] proposed te estimators for te mea umber of persos possessig te rare sesitive attribute usig te urelated questio radomized respose model by utilizig a Poisso distributio Recetly, ee et al [4] exteded te ad et al s [7] study to stratify samplig ad propose te estimators we te parameter of rare urelated attribute is kow ad ukow I tis study, we propose improved estimators for te mea ad its variace of te umber of persos possessig a rare sesitive attribute based o stratified samplig by usig Poisso distributio Te estimators are proposed we te parameter of te rare urelated attribute is kow ad ukow Te proposed estimators are evaluated usig a relative efficiecy comparig te variaces of te estimators reported i ee et al [4] θ, defied by tem is Improved Estimatio of a Rare Sesitive ttribute i Stratified Samplig-Kow Rare Urelated ttributes Cosider te populatio of size N idividuals wic is divided ito subpopulatios strata of sizes N =,,, ll te subpopulatios are disjoit ad togeter comprise te wole populatio I stratum, respodet are selected by simple radom samplig wit replacemet SRSWR ad asked to use te pair of radomizatio devices R ad R, eac cosistig of te two statemets Te radomizatio device R is costructed as: i I possessrare sesitive attribute ii Go to radomizatio device R wit respective probabilities P ad P Te radomizatio device R cosists of two statemets: i I possess rare sesitive attribute ii I possess rare urelated attribute Y wit probabilities P ad P respectively By tis radomized device, te probability of a yes respose i stratum is give by { } θ = P π + P P π + P π, 0 Y were π ad π Y are te populatio proportios of idividuals possessig rare sesitive ad rare urelated t attributes i te stratum, respectively Here π Y is assumed to be kow Sice ad Y are very rare attributes, θ0 = 0 is fiite, assumig ad θ0 0 et x, x,, x be a radom sample i stratum from a Poisso distributio wit parameter 0 Te te maximum likeliood estimator for te mea umber of persos wo ave te rare sesitive attribute i = π, is give by stratum, were Y πy = xi P P Y, { P + P P} i= = is kow mea of persos wo ave rare urelated attribute i stratum Te parameter, is te mea umber of persos possessig rare sesitive attribute, i a populatio of size N ad its estimator is give by W W xi P P Y { P P P} = =, 3 = = + i= were W = N N 86

Wakeel, M war Te variace of te estimator i eac stratum is give by were =, 4 P P + = + P P P P P P Y + Tus, te variace expressio of te estimator may be derived as W = = = = W THEOREM is a ubiased estimator of Proof From 3, we ave W 5 E = E xi P P Y, = P+ P P i= P P + = = = 0 Y W W = P P P = THEOREM Te ubiased estimator for is give by W Proof { } E = xi 6 = P + P P i= W = Ex i = i P P P = + W = = = P + P P { 0} Now, we cosider te proportioal ad optimal allocatios of te total sample size ito differet strata Te metod of proportioal allocatio is used to defie sample sizes i eac stratum depedig o eac stratum size Sice te sample size i eac stratum is defied as = N N, te variace of te estimator, uder proportioal allocatio of sample size is give by = W prop 7 = However, te optimal allocatio is a tecique to defie sample size to miimize variace for a give cost or to miimize te cost for a specified variace Te is proportioate to te stadard deviatio, S of te va- riable I stratified samplig, let cost fuctio is defied as C= c0 + c, were c 0 is te fixed cost ad c is te cost for te eac idividual stratum Witi eac stratum te cost is proportioal to te size of sample, but te cost c may vary from stratum to stratum For fixed cost, usig te Caucy Scwarz iequality, te sample size is give by to miimize = W c = W c So te miimum variace of te estimator for te specified cost C uder te optimum allocatio of sample = 8 87

Wakeel, M war size is give by = W c W c opt = = 9 3 Improved Estimatio of a Rare Sesitive ttribute i Stratified Samplig-Ukow Rare Urelated ttributes I tis sectio, te estimators for te mea umber of rare sesitive attribute are proposed uder te assumptios tat te sizes of stratum are kow; owever, Y = πy, te mea of te rare urelated attribute is ukow I tis case eac selected respodet from stratum is asked to use te sequetial pair of radomizatio devices Tat i te t stratum,, respodets are asked to use te radomizatio devices R ad R cosistig of two statemets Te device R cosists of two statemets: i I possess a sesitive group ii Go to radomizatio device R Te statemets occur wit respective probabilities Te two statemets of te radomizatio device R are: i I possess a sesitive attribute ii I possess urelated attribute Y represeted wit respective probabilities P ad P P ad P respodet is asked to use te same pair of devices T, respectively T, fter usig te first pair of radomized devices, R ad R but wit probabilities T, T ad Te probabilities of te yes resposes for te first ad secod use of pair of radomizatio devices are respectively give by ad θ = P π + P P π + P πy 0 θ = T π + T T π + T πy, were π ad π Y are te respective populatio proportios of rare sesitive ad rare urelated attribute i te stratum s is large ad π, πy 0, terefore θ, θ 0 Now, obviously = θ, = θ et x i ad x i =,,,, i =,,, be te pair of resposes from te it respodet selected i t stratum We ave ar x i E x i P P { P P Y } ar xi E xi T T { T T Y } i, i = i i i i { P P P } { T T T } P P T T = = = + + = = = + + 3 Cov x x E x x E x E x = + + +, Y Followig te expressio give i Equatios ad 3, we ave te sample meas for bot set of resposes as 4 ad x i = P + P P P + Y 5 i= By solvig 5 ad 6, we get estimators of xi = T + T T T + Y 6 i= ad Y as = T T x P P x 7 i i B i= i= 88

Wakeel, M war were B P P P T T T = + + { T T T } x { P P P } x 8 Y i i D i= i= = { + } { + } ad D { T T T} { P P P} [ B] [ B] = + + = T T x P P x, i i i= i= = + Puttig, 3 ad 4 i 9 we get were T T x i P P xi i= i= T T P P Cov xi, xi i= [ + ] = B 9 =, 0 { } { } { + } { + } = T T P + P P + P P T + T T T T P P T T T P P P, { } = T T P P T + T T P + P P Te stratified estimators of { } T T P P Y ad Y are defied as = W, ad = THEOREM 3 is a ubiased estimator for Proof = W Y Y = W = = i i E E W T T E x P P E x B = = = i= i= W = T T P P B Puttig te values of ad i Equatio, we get te result THEOREM 4 Te variace of is give by were W = [ + ] =, 3 B { } { } { + } { + } = T T P + P P + P P T + T T P P T T P P P T T T, { } = P P T T P + P P T + T T { } P P T T Y 89

Wakeel, M war Proof Sice = W, we ave = = = 4 W W = = O puttig 0 i 4 we ave te teorem Corollary : ubiased estimator for te variace of rare sesitive attribute is give by It ca be proved easily THEOREM 5 Y is a ubiased estimator of Proof From 8, we ave E Y W 5 = = B + = + + { T T T } { P P P } = { T + T T} { P + P P} { T + T T} { P + P P } Y { T T T} E xi { P P P} xi + + i= i= = WE = W = Y Y Y = = Corollary : ubiased estimator for Y is give by W were = C + C 6 Y Y = D { } { } { } { } C = T + T T P + P P + P + P P T + T T { P P P} { T T T} + +, { } { } C = T + T T P P + P + P P T T { P P P} { T T T} P P T T + +, { } { } D = T + T T P + P P Now uder proportioal allocatio of sample size, te variace of is give by W = [ + ] prop B = However, i optimum allocatio, te sample size i stratum is ad te variace of is give by W W = + c + c B = B W W = + + c c opt = B = B 90

Wakeel, M war 4 Relative Efficiecy ee et al [4] proposed variace of for rare sesitive attribute based o Poisso distributio we te rare urelated attribute kow ad ukow respectively is: were W P y = +, 7 = P P [ ] = P T W = Λ +Λ, 8 { } Λ = P T + T P P T P T { } Λ = P T P T P T Y For compariso of te proposed estimator wit RE, te relative efficiecy is give by = arge samples are required to estimate te meas of rare sesitive attribute So we cosider a large ypotetical populatio, i order to study te relative efficiecy, settig = 0000 wit two strata avig = 4000 ad = 6000 We coose values of te parameters, Y,, Y as 05,5, 5,05, 5,5 ad 05,05, ad we let te value P rage from 03 to 07, ad let tat of P rage from 06 to 09 we te weigts W = 04 ad W = 06 ad W = 06 ad W = 04 wic is proportioal allocatio lso, let = ad Y = Y 4 Relative Efficiecy We Rare Urelated ttribute Is Kow et be te variace of te proposed estimator rare urelated attribute is kow Te relative efficiecy of proposed estimator wit respect to for te rare sesitive attribute we te parameter of estimator is defied as P Y W + = P P RE = = 9 P P Y W + = P + P P P + P P From Equatio 9 it evidet tat te relative efficiecy of proposed estimator is free from te sample size We set te desig probabilities as P = P ad P = P I Table, te relative efficiecies are give wit parameter values, Y,, Y as 05,5, 5, 05, 5,5 ad 05, 05, P varies from 03 to 07, ad P from 06 to 09 avig weigts W = 04,06 W+ W = It is evidet tat te proposed estimator as efficiecy greater ta i all cases, ad is always better ta te estimator study of Figure cofirms tis 4 Relative Efficiecy We Rare Urelated ttribute Is Ukow et be te variace of te proposed estimator for te rare sesitive attribute we te parameter of rare urelated attribute is ukow Te relative efficiecy of proposed estimator wit respect to estimator is defied as 9

Wakeel, M war Figure Relative Efficiecy RE of te proposed model wit respect to ee et al [4] for W = 04 ad P = 03 to 08 [ + ] W = [ ] [ + ] { P + P P} { T + T T} P T RE = = W = 30 9

Wakeel, M war Te relative efficiecy of proposed estimator is free from te sample size For te aalysis, te desig probabilities are fixed as P = P, P = P, T = T, T = T Settig =, Y = Y wit parameter values of, Y,, Y as 05,5, 5, 05, 5,5 ad P = 06, T = 03, 04, T = 0, 03, 04, 05 ad 04, 05 W + W = Te relative efficiecies are give i Table depict tat te proposed W = estimator outer perform ta estimator avig efficiecy greater ta if we set te probabilities as P T However te relative efficiecy starts decreasig as we take P < T study of Figure cofirms tis lso, we W icreaseste relative efficiecy of proposed estimator icreases Table Relative efficiecy of te proposed estimator wit ee et al 03 W = 04 W = 06 P Y P = 06 07 08 09 P = 06 07 08 09 03 05 5 7346 589 4758 3966 5630 464 399 585 5 5 938 706 5439 466 7336 5334 39 855 5 05 98 973 6887 506 0003 777 57 353 04 05 5 873 6667 58 469 6863 508 373 768 5 5 435 8333 666 4574 936 650 4567 333 5 05 6070 568 85 565 349 9436 6447 407 05 05 5 0097 750 570 437 809 5779 448 95 5 5 375 9699 6908 4885 00 40 775 537 343 5 05 30537 445 977 638 757 848 7776 4633 06 05 5 6090 0489 07 090 9370 6545 4576 335 5 5 9600 404 35 377 3596 906 59 3698 5 05 677 636 596 64 377 4550 95 59 07 05 5 747 4383 464 063 064 735 5005 338 5 5 5 6900 3806 66 5897 0346 66 3984 5 05 33 95 758 350 3759 7587 0776 583 Figure Relative Efficiecy RE of te proposed model wit respect to ee et al [4] for idicated values 93

Wakeel, M war Table Relative efficiecy of te proposed estimator wit ee et al 03, W = 04, ad W = 05 P = P P = P T = T T = T = Y = Y RE W = 04 RE W = 05 06 06 03 0 5 05 597 57464 5 5 6957 896 05 5 0005 5064 03 5 05 0396 9908 5 5 3985 7484 05 5 854 0378 04 5 05 888 035 5 5 086 3773 05 5 65033 89 05 5 05 59836 74795 5 5 8050 0065 05 5 4754 59405 06 06 04 0 5 05 3703 3969 5 5 44483 55603 05 5 7607 4509 03 5 05 5759 398 5 5 364 4578 05 5 43 8038 04 5 05 984 4768 5 5 780 3475 05 5 754 568 5 Coclusio 05 5 05 3870 7338 5 5 946 436 05 5 078 I tis study, a two stage radomized respose model is proposed wit improved estimators for te mea ad its variace of te umber of persos possessig a rare sesitive attribute based o stratified samplig by usig Poisso distributio It is sow tat our proposed metod ave better efficiecies ta te existig radomized respose model, we te parameter of rare urelated attribute is kow ad i ukow case, depedig o te probability of selectig a questio For future work, we ca obtai more sesitive iformatio from respodets by usig stratified double samplig wit te proposed model Refereces [] Warer, S 965 Radomized Respose: Survey Tecique for Elimiatig Evasive swer Bias Joural of 5098 94

Wakeel, M war Computatioal ad Grapical Statistics, 60, 63-66 ttp://dxdoiorg/0080/064599650480775 [] Greeberg, BG, bul-ela,, Simmos, WR ad Horvitz, DG 969 Te Urelated Questio Radomized Respose Model: Teoretical Framework Joural of te merica Statistical ssociatio, 64, 50-539 ttp://dxdoiorg/0080/06459969050099 [3] Magat, NS ad Sig, R 990 O te Cofidetiality Guarateed uder Radomized Respose Samplig: Compariso wit Several New Teciques Biometrical Joural, 40, 37-4 [4] ee, GS, Um, D ad Kim, JM 03 Estimatio of a Rare Sesitive ttribute i a Stratified Sample Usig Poisso Distributio Statistics, 47, 685-709 ttp://dxdoiorg/0080/033888065503 [5] Cauduri, ad Mukerjee, R 988 Radomized Respose: Teory ad Teciques Marcel Dekker, New York [6] Mamood, M, Sig, S ad Hor, S 998 O te Cofidetiality Guarateed uder Radomized Respose Samplig: Compariso wit Several New Teciques Biometrical Joural, 40, 37-4 ttp://dxdoiorg/000/sici5-40369980640:<37::id-bimj37>30co;-n [7] ad, M, Sig, S ad Sedory, S 0 Estimatio of a Rare Sesitive ttribute Usig Poisso Distributio Statistics, 46, 35-360 ttp://dxdoiorg/0080/0338880054300 [8] Bargava, M ad Sig, R 000 Modified Radomizatio Device for Warer s Model Statistica, 60, 35-3 95