Understanding Earth Rotation Part 2: Physical Foundations and Interpretation

Similar documents
Contribution of non-tidal oceanic mass variations to Earth rotation determined from space geodesy and ocean data

ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC EXCITATION OF EARTH ROTATION

Note: This is the accepted manuscript and may marginally differ from the published version.

Fundamental Station Wettzell - geodetic observatory -

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG)

The final publication is available at Springer. DOI: / _6

Torsten Mayer-Gürr Institute of Geodesy, NAWI Graz Technische Universität Graz

Originally published as:

Earth rotation and Earth gravity field from GRACE observations. Lucia Seoane, Christian Bizouard, Daniel Gambis

GG S. Internal Vision of GGOS. Markus Rothacher. GFZ Potsdam

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy, IAG

Assessment of the International Terrestrial Reference System 2014 realizations by Precise Orbit Determination of SLR Satellites

Relationships between mass redistribution, station position, geocenter, and Earth rotation: Results from IGS GNAAC analysis

Hydrological Mass Variations due to Extreme Weather Conditions in Central Europe from Regional GRACE 4D Expansions

A Unique Reference Frame: Basis of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for Geodynamics and Global Change

3.6 ITRS Combination Centres

Geodätische Woche The global radiational S1 tide - current Earth rotation research at TU Wien. September 17, 2015

DGFI Report No. 84. Earth rotation variations from geometric, gravimetric and altimetric observations and geophysical models

The Rotational and Gravitational Signature of Recent Great Earthquakes

Strategy for the Realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)

Perturbed Earth rotation. L. D. Akulenko, S. A. Kumakshev, and A. M. Shmatkov

1/30. Rigid Body Rotations. Dave Frank

Astronomy 6570 Physics of the Planets

Physics 106a, Caltech 4 December, Lecture 18: Examples on Rigid Body Dynamics. Rotating rectangle. Heavy symmetric top

El proyecto Sistema de Observación Geodésico Global [Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS)] de la Asociación Internacional de Geodesia (IAG)

Surface Mass Loads from GRACE, GPS, and Earth Rotation

Astronomy 6570 Physics of the Planets. Precession: Free and Forced

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18" Mathematical models in GPS" Mathematical models used in GPS"

Anna Korbacz 1, Aleksander Brzeziński 1 and Maik Thomas 2. Journées Systèmes de référence spatio-temporels.

Atmospheric Effects in Space Geodesy

GG S Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS): Status and Future. Markus Rothacher, Ruth Neilan, Hans-Peter Plag

Recent Advances in High Resolution Rotation Sensing

State-of-the-art physical models for calculating atmospheric pressure loading effects

Frequent epoch reference frames instead of instant station positions and constant velocities

Interaction between tidal terms and GPS orbits

MAE 142 Homework #5 Due Friday, March 13, 2009

Common Realization of Terrestrial and Celestial Reference Frame

GGOS Bureau for Standards and Conventions

MASS TRANSPORT AND MASS DISTRIBUTION IN THE EARTH SYSTEM

GOCE. Gravity and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer

Rigid bodies - general theory

Can we see evidence of post-glacial geoidal adjustment in the current slowing rate of rotation of the Earth?

Introduction Fundamental definitions Motivation

Lecture 38: Equations of Rigid-Body Motion

(Polar Motion, PM) ERP Vol.29, No PROGRESS IN ASTRONOMY Jul., (2011) P183.3 ( )

Prof. E. Calais Purdue University - EAS Department CIVL 3273

Influence of subdaily tidal model on station coordinates and GPS orbits

SIRGAS: Basis for Geosciences, Geodata, and Navigation in Latin America

OBSERVING AND MODELING LONG-PERIOD TIDAL VARIATIONS IN POLAR MOTION

Lecture 38: Equations of Rigid-Body Motion

2 so that the (time-dependent) torque, as measured in space-xed coordinates, is ~N = ma2! 2 (^x cos!t +^y sin!t) 10 = a p 5 2 ^z ~ F 2 ~F 1 = a p 5^z

Lecture 41: Highlights

The global S 1 tide and Earth s nutation

Revision of the physical backgrounds of Earth s rotation

Consistent dynamic satellite reference frames and terrestrial geodetic datum parameters - status report PN 6 -

The JCET/GSFC (SLR) TRF Solution 2004

Rotation and Interior of Terrestrial Planets

Summary of the 2012 Global Geophysical Fluid Center Workshop

Earth orientation parameters: excitation by atmosphere, oceans and geomagnetic jerks

Impact of Earth Radiation Pressure on LAGEOS Orbits and on the Global Scale

Towards a Rigorous Combination of Space Geodetic Techniques

Very Long Baseline Interferometry for Geodesy and Astrometry

Towards an improved ILRS TRF contribution

AS3010: Introduction to Space Technology

GGOS INFORMATION MODELS: ANALYSIS OF INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN OBSERVATION TECHNIQUES AND THE EARTH GRAVITY FIELD

Direct measurement of diurnal polar motion by ring laser gyroscopes

Introduction to geodetic VLBI

1 General Definitions and Numerical Standards

GGOS The Global Geodetic Observing System of the International Association of Geodesy

Very Long Baseline Interferometry for Geodesy and Astrometry

MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS

Geodetic Observing Systems: tools in observing the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment. Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute

Evaluation of the accuracy of the IAU 2006/2000 precession-nutation

Global vertical datum unification based on the combination of the fixed gravimetric and the scalar free geodetic boundary value problems

ESTIMATION OF NUTATION TERMS USING GPS

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 12 Dec 2016

Originally published as:

Angular Momentum. Objectives CONSERVATION OF ANGULAR MOMENTUM

Dynamics. Dynamics of mechanical particle and particle systems (many body systems)

Chapter 11. Angular Momentum

System of Geodetic Parameters Parametry Zemli 1990 PZ-90.11

expression that describes these corrections with the accuracy of the order of 4. frame usually connected with extragalactic objects.

Dynamics. Basilio Bona. Semester 1, DAUIN Politecnico di Torino. B. Bona (DAUIN) Dynamics Semester 1, / 18

Ph1a: Solution to the Final Exam Alejandro Jenkins, Fall 2004

Assessment of the orbit-related sea level error budget for the TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry mission

EART162: PLANETARY INTERIORS

Roadmap Towards Future Satellite Gravity Missions in Support of Monitoring of Mass Redistribution, Global Change, and Natural Hazards

17. SIGNATURE OF EL NINO IN LENGTH OF DAY AS MEASURED BY VLBI

SLR and the Gravity Field

PHYSICS. Course Structure. Unit Topics Marks. Physical World and Measurement. 1 Physical World. 2 Units and Measurements.

Warkworth geodetic station as a potential GGOS core site in New Zealand

Manipulator Dynamics 2. Instructor: Jacob Rosen Advanced Robotic - MAE 263D - Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering - UCLA

Geodesy and interior structure of Mercury

If the symmetry axes of a uniform symmetric body coincide with the coordinate axes, the products of inertia (Ixy etc.

Physical Dynamics (SPA5304) Lecture Plan 2018

Torge Geodesy. Unauthenticated Download Date 1/9/18 5:16 AM

Interaction between subdaily Earth rotation parameters and GPS orbits Natalia Panafidina, Urs Hugentobler, Manuela Seitz

arxiv:physics/ v1 30 Jun 2004

Analysis Strategies And Software For Geodetic VLBI

Torque and Rotation Lecture 7

Transcription:

Understanding Earth Rotation Part 2: Physical Foundations and Interpretation Prof. Dr. Florian Seitz Technische Universität München (TUM) Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI) Munich, Germany International Summer School on Space Geodesy and Earth System August 21-25, 2012 Shanghai, China 1

Physical Foundations of Earth rotation Earth rotation is a rotational motion of many individual and mutually linked mass elements about one common axis This rotational motion is comparable to that of a physical gyroscope The physical description of Earth rotation is based on equations describing the motion of a gyro 2

Rotational motion of one individual mass element Viewed with respect to a non-rotating reference system: Angular momentum of rotating mass element M: with the relation between angular velocity and track speed v = ω r: e 1 e 3 e 2 M v r ω H = M (r v) H = (Mr 2 ) ω 3

Rotational motion of one individual mass element Viewed with respect to a non-rotating reference system: Angular momentum of rotating mass element M: with the relation between angular velocity and track speed v = ω r: with the moment of inertia J = Mr 2 : H = M (r v) H = (Mr 2 ) ω H = J ω Angular momentum is directly proportional to the angular velocity The proportionality constant is the moment of inertia J 4

Conservation of angular momentum Without external forces: Angular momentum is a conserved quantity: H = (Mr 2 ) ω = const. If the distance of the mass element to the axis of rotation decreases, the angular velocity has to increase accordingly. 5

Rigid system of point masses Total angular momentum of a rigid system of N point masses: with v i = ω r i : The moment of inertia is replaced by the tensor of inertia I: H = Σ M i (r i v i ) H = Σ (M i r i2 ) ω H = I ω The tensor of inertia describes the distribution of the mass elements in the system. N i=1 N i=1 6

Conservation of angular momentum & balance of angular momentum In a closed system the total angular momentum is conserved: N H = Σ M i (r i v i ) = H 1 + H 2 + H 3 +... + H N = const. i=1 7

Conservation of angular momentum & balance of angular momentum 8 In a closed system the total angular momentum is conserved: H = Σ M i (r i v i ) = H 1 + H 2 + H 3 +... + H N = const. i=1 If external forces are acting (e.g. gravitation): N N i=1 N i=1 N i=1 balance of total angular momentum H and total external torque L:

Non-rotating reference system For a rotary motion in a non-rotating reference system we have for every arbitrary vector x: (example: v = ω r ) Coordinate axes do not participate in the rotation. We have for the unity vectors e j (j = 1,2,3) : e 1 e 3 e 2 x x ω x = ω x e j = 0 9

Rotating reference system For a rotary motion in a rotating reference system we have also for the coordinate vectors: e j e j ω e j = ω e j 10

Rotating reference system For a rotary motion in a rotating reference system we have also for the coordinate vectors: So we have for every arbitrary vector x j e j + x j e j x j e j + x j ω e j 3 x = Σ x j e j j=1 e j = ω e j x x j e j + ω (x j e j ) = + ω x t 11

Rotating reference system For a rotary motion in a rotating reference system we have also for the coordinate vectors: So we have for every arbitrary vector x j e j + x j e j x j e j + x j ω e j Balance of angular momentum in a rotating reference system: 3 x = Σ x j e j j=1 dh = dt H t e j = ω e j x x j e j + ω (x j e j ) = + ω x t + ω H = L 12

Balance of angular momentum of a rotating solid body Balance of angular momentum in a rotating reference system: Angular momentum of a rotating solid body: + ω(t) H(t) = L(t) H(t) = I ω(t) 13

Balance of angular momentum of a rotating solid body Balance of angular momentum in a rotating reference system: Angular momentum of a rotating solid body: Assumption: Coordinate axes are principal axes: Then I has diagonal structure: (A < B < C: principal moments of inertia of the Earth) + ω(t) H(t) = L(t) H(t) = I ω(t) 14

Balance of angular momentum of a rotating solid body Balance of angular momentum in a rotating reference system: Angular momentum of a rotating solid body: Assumption: Coordinate axes are principal axes: Then I has diagonal structure: ω 1 ω 2 + ω(t) H(t) = L(t) H(t) = I ω(t) with ω = and L = expansion delivers L 1 L 2 ω 3 L 3 15

Balance of angular momentum of a rotating solid body Balance of angular momentum in a rotating reference system: Angular momentum of a rotating solid body: Equations of motion for the rotation of a rigid body in the principal coordinate system: + ω(t) H(t) = L(t) H(t) = I ω(t) A ω 1 + (C-B) ω 2 ω 3 = L 1 B ω 2 + (A-C) ω 3 ω 1 = L 2 C ω 3 + (B-A) ω 1 ω 2 = L 3 16

Euler s Equation of Motion 17 (Leonhard Euler: Painting by Emanuel Handmann, Switzerland) A ω 1 + (C-B) ω 2 ω 3 = L 1 B ω 2 + (A-C) ω 3 ω 1 = L 2 C ω 3 + (B-A) ω 1 ω 2 = L 3 Euler s equation of motion

From the rotating rigid body to a rotating deformable body Balance of angular momentum in the rotating reference system: Angular momentum of a rotating rigid body: Angular momentum of a rotating deformable body: with h(t) as relative angular momentum: N h(t) = Σ M i (r i v rel i ) i=1 + ω(t) H(t) = L(t) H(t) = I ω(t) H(t) = I(t)ω(t) + h(t) The relative angular momentum describes the effect of the motion of mass elements w.r.t. the reference system. 18

From the rotating rigid body to a rotating deformable body Balance of angular momentum in the rotating reference system: Angular momentum of a rotating rigid body: Angular momentum of a rotating deformable body: Euler-Liouville - Equation: + ω(t) H(t) = L(t) H(t) = I ω(t) H(t) = I(t)ω(t) + h(t) (I(t)ω(t) + h(t)) + ω(t) (I(t)ω(t) + h(t)) = L(t) t 19

Balance of angular momentum in the Earth system Model approaches for Earth rotation are based on the balance of angular momentum in an Earth-fixed coordinate system (Euler-Liouville Equation): with angular momentum L(t): I(t): h(t): ω(t): d dt external gravitational torques (Sun, Moon, planets) Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momenta Earth rotation vector H() t + ω() t H() t = L() t H() t = I() t ω() t + h() t 20

Balance of angular momentum in the Earth system Model approaches for Earth rotation are based on the balance of angular momentum in an Earth-fixed coordinate system (Euler-Liouville Equation): with angular momentum L(t): I(t): h(t): ω(t): d dt external gravitational torques (Sun, Moon, planets) Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momenta Earth rotation vector y + z x y x z 2 2 N i i i i i i 2 2 i i i i i i= 1 2 2 symm. xi + yi H() t + ω() t H() t = L() t H() t = I() t ω() t + h() t I() t = M x + z y z 21

Balance of angular momentum in the Earth system Model approaches for Earth rotation are based on the balance of angular momentum in an Earth-fixed coordinate system (Euler-Liouville Equation): with angular momentum L(t): I(t): h(t): ω(t): d dt external gravitational torques (Sun, Moon, planets) Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momenta Earth rotation vector I() t = I + Δ I() t 0 H() t + ω() t H() t = L() t H() t = I() t ω() t + h() t approximate tensor of the Earth (time-invariant) temporal variations due to dynamical processes 22

Balance of angular momentum in the Earth system Model approaches for Earth rotation are based on the balance of angular momentum in an Earth-fixed coordinate system (Euler-Liouville Equation): with angular momentum L(t): I(t): h(t): ω(t): d dt external gravitational torques (Sun, Moon, planets) Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momenta Earth rotation vector H() t + ω() t H() t = L() t H() t = I() t ω() t + h() t A 0 c11( t) c12( t) c13( t) I() t = B + c () t c () t 22 23 0 C symm. c33( t) 23

Balance of angular momentum in the Earth system Model approaches for Earth rotation are based on the balance of angular momentum in an Earth-fixed coordinate system (Euler-Liouville Equation): with angular momentum L(t): I(t): h(t): ω(t): d dt external gravitational torques (Sun, Moon, planets) Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momenta Earth rotation vector H() t + ω() t H() t = L() t H() t = I() t ω() t + h() t N i= 1 ( rel ) h() t = M r() t v () t i i i 24

Balance of angular momentum in the Earth system Model approaches for Earth rotation are based on the balance of angular momentum in an Earth-fixed coordinate system (Euler-Liouville Equation): with angular momentum L(t): I(t): h(t): ω(t): d dt external gravitational torques (Sun, Moon, planets) Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momenta Earth rotation vector H() t + ω() t H() t = L() t H() t = I() t ω() t + h() t m() 1 t ω() t = Ω m() 2 t mi << 1 1+ m 3( t) Ω 2π = 86164 s 25

Balance of angular momentum in the Earth system Model approaches for Earth rotation are based on the balance of angular momentum in an Earth-fixed coordinate system (Euler-Liouville Equation): with angular momentum L(t): I(t): h(t): ω(t): d dt external gravitational torques (Sun, Moon, planets) Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momenta Earth rotation vector m() 1 t ω() t = Ω m() 2 t 1+ m 3( t) H() t + ω() t H() t = L() t H() t = I() t ω() t + h() t polar motion angular velocity, ΔUT / LOD 26

Excursion: Earth rotation parameters The rotation of the Earth and its temporal variation are monitored by geodetic and astrometric observation systems since decades with very high accuracy. Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) GNSS Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) 27

Excursion: Earth rotation parameters The rotation of the Earth and its temporal variation are monitored by geodetic and astrometric observation systems since decades with very high accuracy. Observations of the orientation of the Earth axis and the angular velocity of the rotation are transformed into time series of Earth rotation parameters (ERP). Polar motion: Location of the axis of the CIP w.r.t. an Earth-fixed reference system IERS C04 CTP Conventional Terrestrial Pole 28

Excursion: Earth rotation parameters 29 The rotation of the Earth and its temporal variation are monitored by geodetic and astrometric observation systems since decades with very high accuracy. Observations of the orientation of the Earth axis and the angular velocity of the rotation are transformed into time series of Earth rotation parameters (ERP). Polar motion: Location of the axis of the CIP w.r.t. an Earth-fixed reference system IERS C04 IERS C04 Length-of-day (LOD): Related to the Earth s angular velocity. LOD = length of a solar day with respect to a nominal day of 86400 s (= 24 hours)

Observation of Earth rotation and its importance The rotation of the Earth and its temporal variation are monitored by geodetic and astrometric observation systems since decades with very high accuracy. Observations of the orientation of the Earth axis and the angular velocity of the rotation are transformed into time series of Earth rotation parameters (ERP). Precise knowledge of temporal variations of ERP is fundamental, a.o. for the realisation of time systems for the highly precise computation of geodetic reference frames in order to relate Earth-fixed and space-fixed coordinate systems for precise navigationon Earth and in space interesting for various disciplines of geosciences, since dynamic processes in the Earth system are reflected in the temporal variations of the ERP Analysis of ERP time series allows for conclusions with respect to processes and changes in the Earth system on various temporal scales 30

Polar motion: Signal characteristics Mainly beat of two oscillations: 365 days (annual oscillation) 434 days (Chandler oscillation) 31

32 Polar motion: Signal characteristics x Component

Polar motion: Chandler oscillation Figure Axis ω Figure axis Rotation axis Free oscillation of rotation axis with respect to an Earth-fixed reference frame Period: Rigid Earth body: Euler-period (304 days) Non-rigid Earth body: Chandler-period (434 days) Free polar motion is superposed by forced polar motion 33

ERP integral quantities of the Earth system Variations are caused by a multitude of superposed effects (e.g. gravitational effects (torques, tides), dynamic processes in the Earth system involving the transport of masses in the Earth system) 34 [Ilk et al., 2005]

ERP integral quantities of the Earth system Variations are caused by a multitude of superposed effects (e.g. gravitational effects (torques, tides), dynamic processes in the Earth system involving the transport of masses in the Earth system) ERP provide an important information to the balance of angular momentum in the Earth system But: The time series do not allow for conclusions with respect to specific underlying processes without further knowledge The interpretation / separation of observed variations requires independent information from numerical model approaches 35

Effect of dynamic processes in the Earth system Displacement of mass elements temporal changes I(t) of the tensor of inertia mass term Motions of mass elements with respect to the reference system relative angular momentum h(t) motion term [Fig.: S. Böhm] 36

37 Expansion of the Euler-Liouville equation Ω

Expansion of the Euler-Liouville equation Assumptions: rotational symmetry of the Earth around its z-axis (A=B) products of small quantities (c ij, h i, m i ) and their derivatives are negligible A 1 2 m 1 + m2 = L 2 1 + Ω c23 Ωc 13 + Ωh2 h 1 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) A 1 2 m 2 m1 = L 2 2 Ω c13 Ωc 23 + Ωh1 h 2 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) 1 m 3 = Ωc33 h3 ΩC Components of the Earth rotation vector as functions of external torques, and mass redistributions and motions that are due to dynamical processes in the Earth system. 38

Expansion of the Euler-Liouville equation Assumptions: rotational symmetry of the Earth around its z-axis (A=B) products of small quantities (c ij, h i, m i ) and their derivatives are negligible A 1 2 m 1 + m2 = L 2 1 + Ω c23 Ωc 13 + Ωh2 h 1 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) A 1 2 m 2 m1 = L 2 2 Ω c13 Ωc 23 + Ωh1 h 2 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) 1 m 3 = Ωc33 h3 ΩC =Ψ 2 = Ψ 1 = Ψ 3 excitation functions 39 [Lambeck, 1980]

Expansion of the Euler-Liouville equation Assumptions: rotational symmetry of the Earth around its z-axis (A=B) products of small quantities (c ij, h i, m i ) and their derivatives are negligible A 1 2 m 1 + m2 = L 2 1 + Ω c23 Ωc 13 + Ωh2 h 1 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) A 1 2 m 2 m1 = L 2 2 Ω c13 Ωc 23 + Ωh1 h 2 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) A 1 = Ω( C A) σ r 1 m 3 = Ωc33 h3 ΩC (Euler-period = 304 days) 40 [Lambeck, 1980]

Expansion of the Euler-Liouville equation Assumptions: rotational symmetry of the Earth around its z-axis (A=B) products of small quantities (c ij, h i, m i ) and their derivatives are negligible A 1 2 m 1 + m2 = L 2 1 + Ω c23 Ωc 13 + Ωh2 h 1 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) A 1 2 m 2 m1 = L 2 2 Ω c13 Ωc 23 + Ωh1 h 2 Ω( C A) Ω ( C A) 1 m 3 = Ωc33 h3 ΩC Solution of these equations for m i delivers the Earth rotation vector 41 [Lambeck, 1980]

Simple case: Rigid Earth body and no external forces 42 no variations of the tensor (c ij = 0) and no relative angular momenta (h i = 0) no external torques (L i = 0) m m 1 + m = 1 2 σ r 1 m = 2 1 σ r 0 0 m 3 = 0 A 1 = Ω( C A) σ r Ψ 1, Ψ 2, Ψ 3 = 0 (Euler-period = 304 days) [Lambeck, 1980]

Simple case: Rigid Earth body and no external forces no variations of the tensor (c ij = 0) and no relative angular momenta (h i = 0) no external torques (L i = 0) m m 1 + m = 1 2 σ r 1 m = 2 1 σ r 0 0 m 3 = 0 Ψ 1, Ψ 2, Ψ 3 = 0 no variation of the angular velocity (LOD = constant) 43

Simple case: Rigid Earth body and no external forces no variations of the tensor (c ij = 0) and no relative angular momenta (h i = 0) no external torques (L i = 0) m m 1 + m = 1 2 σ r 1 m = 2 1 σ r 0 0 Ψ 1, Ψ 2, Ψ 3 = 0 Complex formulation: m = m1+ im2 Im(m) x-component m 1 m 2 y-component 44 Re(m)

Simple case: Rigid Earth body and no external forces no variations of the tensor (c ij = 0) and no relative angular momenta (h i = 0) no external torques (L i = 0) m m 1 + m = 1 2 σ r 1 m = 2 1 σ r 0 0 Ψ 1, Ψ 2, Ψ 3 = 0 1 i m + m = σ r 0 45

Simple case: Rigid Earth body and no external forces no variations of the tensor (c ij = 0) and no relative angular momenta (h i = 0) no external torques (L i = 0) m m 1 + m = 1 2 σ r 1 m = 2 1 σ r Solution: 0 0 0 i t m e σ r mt () = Ψ 1, Ψ 2, Ψ 3 = 0 1 i m + m = σ r 0 Undamped circular motion at frequency σ r (1 rev / 304 d) 46

Real case: Various dynamic processes in the Earth system influence Earth rotation Model approach: Development of physically consistent and comprehensive dynamic Earth models for the simulation of the Earth s rotational dynamics 47

Required information for modelling ERP Distribution and motion of mass elements in various components of the Earth system (atmosphere, ocean, hydrosphere, cryosphere, solid Earth, ): variations of the Earth s tensor of inertia relative angular momentum pressure related loading effects Ephemerides of Sun, Moon, external gravitational torques tidal deformations Geometrical, physical, and rheological parameters of the Earth (Earth ellipsoid, mean tensor of inertia, Love numbers, ) Model result is highly dependent on completeness of the effects considered in the model quality and consistency of the applied forcing model parameters 48

49 Forward model for Earth rotation [Seitz et al., GJI, 2004]

Forward model for Earth rotation back-coupling effect of polar motion transition from rotating rigid body to rotating deformable body direct influence on the model s Chandler oscillation 50 [Seitz et al., GJI, 2004]

Rotational deformation Temporal variations of the Earth s centrifugal potential cause redistributions of masses in the solid Earth and in the oceans: 2 3 Ω a ΔC 21( t) = ( R ( k2)m 1( t) +I( k2)m 2( t)) 3GM 2 3 Ω a ΔS 21( t) = ( R( k2)m 2( t) I( k2)m 1( t)) 3GM k = k + Δk + Δk * O A 2 2 2 2 with the pole tide Love number. IERS-Conv. 2010: k 2 = 0.35 + 0.0036i response of the solid Earth and the oceans considering mantle anelasicity 51

Rotational deformation Temporal variations of the Earth s centrifugal potential cause redistributions of masses in the solid Earth and in the oceans: ΔC 21( ) 2 3 Ω a ΔC 21( t) = ( R ( k2)m 1( t) +I( k2)m 2( t)) 3GM 2 3 Ω a ΔS 21( t) = ( R( k2)m 2( t) I( k2)m 1( t)) 3GM with the pole tide Love number. t 21 ΔS ( t) IERS-Conv. 2010: k 2 = 0.35 + 0.0036i and are directly related to variations of the tensor of inertia ( ) c ()= t f ΔC ( t),δs ( t) ij k = k + Δk + Δk * O A 2 2 2 2 21 21 and thus enter into the Euler-Liouville-Equation. 52

Simulated free polar motion x-component Deformability of the Earth s body: Lengthening of the period of the free rotation from 304 to 432 days (Chandler-period) Consideration of mantle anelasticity: dissipation of energy due to friction Damping of the Chandler oscillation Without excitation the free polar motion would diminish within few decades (figure axis = rotation axis) 53

54 Forward model for Earth rotation [Seitz et al., GJI, 2004]

Model forcing Numerical values for ΔI(t) and h(t) are derived from model data of Earth system components, e.g. global atmospheric reanalyses of NCEP - assimilates meteorological observation data - atmospheric angular momentum from wind fields and surface pressure global ocean circulation model ECCO - forced by NCEP fields of wind stress, heat and freshwater fluxes - oceanic angular momentum from currents and water masses consistent representation of dynamics and mass transports in the subsystems atmosphere and ocean water, groundwater and snow fields from the global hydrological model LaD neglected: earthquakes, volcanoes, postglacial uplift, core/mantle, 55

Model results for polar motion x-component: corr.: 0,98; RMS-diff.: 29,5 mas y-component: corr.: 0,99; RMS-diff.: 23,3 mas 56

Model results for polar motion (1950-2010) Model forcing: NCEP + ECCO Full PM C01/C04 Chandler C01/C04 Corr-Coef.: 0.95 RMS-Diff.: 43.7 mas Corr-Coef.: 0.99 RMS-Diff.: 17.3 mas 57 [Seitz et al., JGR, 2012]

Dynamic processes and polar motion ftp://gemini.gsfc.nasa.gov

59 Variations of LOD

Dynamic processes and ΔLOD ftp://gemini.gsfc.nasa.gov

Summary Earth Rotation Parameters contain important information on geodynamic processes since the ERP are directly related to the balance of angular momentum in the Earth system. Angular momentum variations are linked to the motion and redistribution of masses in various components of the Earth system, and therefore a study of ERP allows for conclusions with respect to such processes. Interpretation of observed time series of ERP: Their integrative nature necessitates the development of advanced geophysical models in order to separate observations into individual effects. Current research topics: consideration of further system components in the simulations: can remaining gaps in the balance of angular momentum be closed? predictions on various time scales inverse modeling: Incorporation of ERP as constraints independent determination of mass transport processes from other observations (gravimetrical observations, altimetry, ) 61

Summary Earth Rotation Parameters contain important information on geodynamic processes since the ERP are directly related to the balance of angular momentum in the Earth system. Angular momentum variations are linked to the motion and redistribution of masses in various components of the Earth system, and therefore a study of ERP allows for conclusions with respect to such processes. Interpretation of observed time series of ERP: Their integrative nature necessitates the development of advanced geophysical models in order to separate observations into individual effects. Current research topics: consideration of further system components in the simulations: can remaining gaps in the balance of angular momentum be closed? predictions on various time scales inverse modeling: Incorporation of ERP as constraints independent determination of mass transport processes from other observations (gravimetrical observations, altimetry, ) 62

Technische Universität München ESPACE: Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology An International 2-years Master s program (M.Sc.) in Satellite Application Engineering at the TU Munich, Germany Combines spacecraft engineering with its applications within one interdisciplinary program Three study lines: Earth System Science from Space Remote Sensing Satellite Navigation Spacecraft Engineering Earth System Science Remote Sensing Navigation ESPACE MSc in Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology www.espace-tum.de

ESPACE: Cooperating Institutions Technische Universität München Munich has a unique concentration of know-how related to Space Science and Technology! ESPACE is coordinated at the TUM with teaching staff from: 3 Universities: (TUM, LMU, Univ. of Federal Armed Forces) Research Institutions: (German Aerospace Center (DLR), German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI)) ESPACE MSc in Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology www.espace-tum.de

ESPACE: Admission Technische Universität München Admission is highly competitive! Above average Bachelor or Diploma degree from an internationally recognized university in Science or Engineering such as: mathematics, physics, informatics, mechanical/electrical/aerospace engineering, geodesy, geophysics, Proof of English: TOEFL, IELTS or equivalent APS certificate Interview (Skype or in person) Application period for the winter term (starting each year in October) is from December until mid-march (non-eu citizens) ESPACE MSc in Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology www.espace-tum.de

Technische Universität München ESPACE: Double Degree with the Wuhan University China s most prominent and largest university in the fields of Geodesy, Geo-information and Remote Sensing Duration: 3 years in total (i.e. one more year than the regular ESPACE program) At least one year of studies abroad Graduates obtain two Master s Degrees: M. Sc. from the TUM and M.Sc. from the WHU ESPACE MSc in Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology www.espace-tum.de

Technische Universität München We hope to see you in Munich!! ESPACE MSc in Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology www.espace-tum.de