Advanced Neutrino Sources

Similar documents
NEUTRINO FACTORY / MUON STORAGE RING

A final report of the Interna/onal Design Study for a Neutrino Factory

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

Proof for ν τ appearance in the atmospheric sector (ν Measurement of m 2 23 and θ 23 (MINOS, OPERA)

General Considerations

Muon Front-End without Cooling

Overview of HEMC Scheme

Current and Future Developments in Accelerator Facilities. Jordan Nash, Imperial College London

PoS(Nufact08)043. The Totally Active Scintillator Detector. Alan Bross 1 2. Malcolm Ellis. Steve Geer. Enrique Fernandez-Martinez.

Physics Potential of existing and future LBL ν beams

Marcos Dracos IPHC-IN2P3/CNRS Strasbourg. 2 December 2008 M. Dracos, BENE 1

BNL Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Expt.

Optimization of the Buncher and Phase Rotator for Neutrino Factory

Muon Accelerators for Particle Physics Achievements and Working Group Plans

The ESS neutrino facility for CP violation discovery

Why a muon collider?

Long & Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Studies at Intense Proton Sources. Jeff Nelson College of William & Mary

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

The NuMAX Long Baseline Neutrino Factory Concept *

Short Introduction to CLIC and CTF3, Technologies for Future Linear Colliders

Measurement of Higgs couplings and mass in e + e collisions at CLIC in the s range of 350 GeV - 3 TeV

Sensitivity of the DUNE Experiment to CP Violation. Lisa Whitehead Koerner University of Houston for the DUNE Collaboration

Marcos Dracos IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS/IN2P3, F Strasbourg, France

Modern Accelerators for High Energy Physics

Accelerator Neutrino Experiments News from Neutrino 2010 Athens

The International Linear Collider. Barry Barish Caltech 2006 SLUO Annual Meeting 11-Sept-06

Ionization Cooling Demonstration

High Pressure, High Gradient RF Cavities for Muon Beam Cooling

Neutrino Detectors for future facilities - III

TeV Scale Muon RLA Complex Large Emittance MC Scenario

Introduction to the Neutrino Factory

A new underground laboratory at Frejus

PoS(NOW2016)003. T2K oscillation results. Lorenzo Magaletti. INFN Sezione di Bari

Status and Neutrino Oscillation Physics Potential of the Hyper-Kamiokande Project in Japan

Recent T2K results on CP violation in the lepton sector

Optimization of the SIS100 Lattice and a Dedicated Collimation System for Ionisation Losses

arxiv:physics/ v2 [physics.acc-ph] 23 Nov 2004

Application of GLoBES: GLACIER on conventional neutrino beams

High-gradient X-band RF technology for CLIC and beyond

Review of ISOL-type Radioactive Beam Facilities

Proposal for a US strategy towards physics & detectors at future lepton colliders

Recent Results from T2K and Future Prospects

Pros and Cons of the Acceleration Scheme (NF-IDS)

Technology Development. Overview and Outlook

The High-Power-Target System of a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory

Measuring the neutrino mass hierarchy with atmospheric neutrinos in IceCube(-Gen2)

The T2K experiment Results and Perspectives. PPC2017 Corpus Christi Mai 2017 Michel Gonin On behalf of the T2K collaboration

LHC Status and CERN s future plans. Lyn Evans

MICE: The Trackers and Magnets

What If U e3 2 < 10 4? Neutrino Factories and Other Matters

Proposal for a lepton CP violation discovery experiment using a neutrino Super Beam from ESS

A lepton CP violation discovery experiment using a unique neutrino Super Beam

Neutrino oscillation phenomenology

Fermilab Program. Pier Oddone, Fermilab NAS Board of Physics and Astronomy, 2009

New Electron Source for Energy Recovery Linacs

Overview of Acceleration

Concepts and R&D for beta beam facilities

PoS(EPS-HEP2015)522. The status of MICE Step IV

PoS(NEUTEL2015)037. The NOvA Experiment. G. Pawloski University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA


Particles and Universe: Particle accelerators

The NOνA Experiment and the Future of Neutrino Oscillations

The Electron-Ion Collider

Long Baseline Neutrinos

Longbase Neutrino Physics. Neil McCauley University of Liverpool Birmingham February 2013

Neutrino oscillation physics potential of Hyper-Kamiokande

How Will We See Leptonic CP Violation? D. Casper University of California, Irvine

New Physics with a High Intensity PS (in Italy)

Detecting ν τ appearance in the spectra of quasielastic CC events

EFFECT OF HIGH SOLENOIDAL MAGNETIC FIELDS ON BREAKDOWN VOLTAGES OF HIGH VACUUM 805 MHZ CAVITIES

Update on MOMENT s Target Station Studies

LBL projects and neutrino CP violation in Europe

Study of possible opportunities for leptonic CP violation and mass hierarchy at LNGS

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Neutrino Event Tagging Based On Nucleon Energy Spectra

Neutrino Oscillation and CP violation

Status & Plans for the TRIUMF ISAC Facility

(a) (b) Fig. 1 - The LEP/LHC tunnel map and (b) the CERN accelerator system.

ILC Particle Sources -Electron and PositronMasao KURIKI (Hiroshima University)

Some thoughts on neutrino beams for. neutrino cross-section measurements. A. Bueno, S. Navas, A. Rubbia. (ETH Zürich)

Emittance Measurement in the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

The Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Kate Scholberg, Duke University NOW 2012

Perspective from Fermilab NRC-DUSEL, December 15, 2010

Sensitivity to sterile ν mixings at a ν Factory --Side business of a ν Factory --

A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:

NO A. Karol Lang. University of Texas at Austin. For the NOvA Collaboration. XII International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes

LBNF Neutrino Beam. James Strait Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL , USA. on behalf of the LBNF/DUNE Team

Lectures on accelerator physics

OPTIMIZED CAPTURE MECHANISM FOR A MUON COLLIDER/ NEUTRINO FACTORY TARGET SYSTEM. HISHAM SAYED 1 X. Ding 2, H. Kirk 1, K.

Gaseous Hydrogen in Muon Accelerators

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Electron acceleration behind self-modulating proton beam in plasma with a density gradient. Alexey Petrenko

Accelerator development

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Compressor Ring. Contents Where do we go? Beam physics limitations Possible Compressor ring choices Conclusions. Valeri Lebedev.

DOE Office of High Energy Physics Perspective on DUSEL

Neutrino Factory in Japan: based on FFAG

Physics 736. Experimental Methods in Nuclear-, Particle-, and Astrophysics. - Accelerator Techniques: Introduction and History -

THE FUTURE PROSPECTS OF MUON COLLIDERS AND NEUTRINO FACTORIES

MINOS. Luke A. Corwin, for MINOS Collaboration Indiana University XIV International Workshop On Neutrino Telescopes 2011 March 15

Transcription:

Advanced Neutrino Sources (Neutrino Factories and Beta Beams) Experiments at advanced neutrino sources would be designed to go beyond the planned few-sigma discoveries (θ 13, mass hierarchy, CPV) and make precision measurements of the oscillation parameters, and precisely test the 3-flavor mixing framework. If θ 13 is small, they may also have to make the initial few-sigma discoveries. Design R&D Status Remaining R&D Needed Cost and Illustrative Schedule Information Appendix: Physics reach Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 1

INTRODUCTION: ADVANCED NEUTRINO SOURCES Neutrino Factories (NF) & Beta Beams (BB) produce ν beams by storing unstable particles in a ring with long straight sections: + µ + 50 % + 50 % µ µ e ν eν e ν eν NF ν e ν e ν µ 50 % + 50 % µ µ ν 6 2 BB Examples 18 10 Ne He 6 3 18 9 Li F e e + ν ν e e The stored beam properties & decay kinematics are well known uncertainties on neutrino flux & spectra are small PRECISION Initial beams are flavor pure (BB) or tagged by final lepton charge (NF) PRECISION The NF has the additional advantages of very low background rates (wrong-sign muon signature) & a wealth of information (to obtain oscillation parameters can measure and simultaneously fit 6 spectra with µ + & 6 spectra with µ - stored) PRECISION. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 2

BETA BEAMS Need beta-decaying ion sources for ν e & anti-ν e Accelerate to high energy (E ν 2γQ with Q~few MeV) & need fast ramp Store in decay ring Would also like conventional ν µ beam with same L/E CERN EXAMPLE EURISOL+SPS γ 150 ( 6 He) or 250 ( 18 Ne) Ring length ~ 6km Beam Frejus (L=130km) Eurisol at CERN: Ion choice: 6 He and 18 Ne 7 Li 6 Li 7 Li(d,p) 8 Li 6 Li( 3 He, n) 8 B Alternative Ion Source using ring with gas-jet target & ionization cooling (C. Rubbia et al., NIM A 568 (2006) 475 487) Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 3

FNAL BETA BEAM SCENARIO ILLUSTRATIVE SCENARIO Proton Source = Project X New ion source: 8 Li and 8 B Target ECR to strip & bunch Ion Acceleration New Linac ~100 MeV/u New Synchrotron ~500 MeV/u Booster γ= few MI final energy New decay ring (circum= ~3 Km) EXAMPLE γ <E ν > τ 0 (rest) 8 Li 60 1.0 GeV 0.84s 8 B 101 1.7 GeV 0.77s Baseline L~300km R&D ISSUES General 8 B production (sticks to target) High freq. ECR source (to deal with intensities) Fermilab specific Accumulator ring design Decay ring design Detailed study of intensity limitations due to e.g. activation of machines (estimate 1 W/m from decay in Booster for 10 19 decays/yr in straight). Detailed study of RF required manipulations NOTE: Following the 2004 APS Neutrino Study recommendation with limited U.S. resources, have not invested in BB R&D No FNAL BB Feasibility Study. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 4

NEUTRINO FACTORY DESIGN STUDIES In the U.S. (with international partners) we have been investing in NF R&D for the last decade (NF idea proposed in 1997) component development, systems testing, & 4 generations of design studies: First Generation Feasibility Studies: Feasibility Study 1 (FNAL 2000) Japanese Study 1 (2001) CERN Study (2004) Second Generation Performance & Cost-Reduction Studies: Study 2 (BNL 2001): performance Studies 2a & 2b (2001-6): cost effectiveness Third Generation International Study: International Scoping Study (RAL 2006): International baseline design Fourth Generation Study: International Design Study: ZDR by ~2010, RDR by ~2012) Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 5

NEUTRINO FACTORY INGREDIENTS Proton Source primary beam on production target Target, Capture, and Decay create π; decay into µ Bunching & Phase Rotation reduce E of bunch Cooling reduce transverse emittance Acceleration 130 MeV E NF Storage Ring store for 500 turns; long straight section Decay Channel Buncher Linear Cooler Pre Accel -erator Hg-Jet Target 5-10 GeV 2-4 MW Proton Source Acceleration 1.5-5 GeV Accumulate & Rebunch 10-20 GeV Storage Ring US Design schematic: 20 GeV NF (Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 011001 (2006)) ν Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 6

NEUTRINO FACTORY: ISS DESIGN International Neutrino Factory design study sponsored by RAL Participation & leadership from Europe, U.S., & Japan. Selected 25 GeV NF design similar to Study 2b 20 GeV design Report: RAL-TR-2007-23 NEUTRINO FACTORY: 4 GeV DESIGN During the ISS a new concept emerged for a NF detector that can measure the muon charge from low energy neutrino interactions. 4 GeV NF combines strengths of Wide Band Beam (spanning several oscillations) & NF outstanding performance for both large & small θ 13 DUSEL PROJ. X Cheaper (less acceleration) & matched to FNAL DUSEL baseline NF 4 GeV NF on the FNAL Site Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 7 MI

PROTON SOURCE REQUIREMENTS Need beam power (at least 2MW) and short bunches (3ns). Optimum beam energy = 10 ± 5 GeV (ISS study) but at fixed power, muon yield drops slowly with energy - lose ~30% for E=120 GeV (Mokhov) Project X is well suited to drive a NF. To get 2MW use either: (i) Project X + MI (50 GeV, say) + new 50 GeV rebunching ring, or (ii) Upgraded Project X (2MW at 8 GeV) + new 8 GeV rebunching ring. TARGET STATION A 4MW target station design study was part of Neutrino Factory Study 1 in 2000 ORNL/TM-2001/124 Facility studied was 49m long = target hall & decay channel, shielding, solenoids, remote handling & target systems. Target: liquid Hg jet inside 20T solenoid. 4MW Target Station Design Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 8

HOT NEWS: MERIT RESULTS NF Studies 1 & 2 identified the target technology (a liquid Hg jet injected into a 20T solenoid) as the one of the most challenging parts of a NF target R&D program. In Fall 2007 the target R&D culminated in the MERIT expt which successfully demonstrated a liquid Hg jet injected into a 15T solenoid, & hit with a suitably intense beam from the CERN PS (115 KJ / pulse!) 4 3 2 1 MERIT EXPERIMENT The jet is disrupted, but this happens on a ms timescale (disruption length <28 cm ~ 2 int. lengths. The jet was observed to re-establish itself after 15ms before the next beam pulse arrives. Preliminary analysis suggests this target technology is good for beams up to 8 MW! Hg jet in a 15T solenoid Observed with high-speed camera Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 9

BUNCHING, PHASE ROTATION, COOLING A clever arrangement of RF cavities bunches the muons & reduces their energy spread. µ/p (8GeV) 0.2 0.1 0 Trans. emittance µ/p within acceptance 100 200 Distance along channel (m) An ionization cooling channel reduces trans. phase space, increasing useful number of muons by 1.7 (believed cost effective c.f. increasing detector mass) ε t,, N (m) Two R&D efforts must be completed for all this to be can build : RF in magnetic fields MICE Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 10

Normal Conducting RF in MAGNETIC FIELDS Need NCRF cavities operating in few-tesla magnetic fields Could use open iris copper cavities (multi-cell 805 MHz cavity tested in few Tesla field) Since muons are penetrating particles, we have the option of closing the iris with a thin conducting window. At fixed peak power this doubles the gradient on-axis more compact channel & half the number of klystrons! Two closed-cell cavity options being explored (vacuum cavities & cavities filled with high pressure H 2 ). We are in the middle of the R&D needed to see if these options give the desired performance. Need to complete this R&D before locking in to the choice of RF technology. Closed-cell 201 MHz cavity processed with SCRF-type treatment (electropolishing etc) exceeded design gradient without any conditioning. Will be tested in appropriate magnetic field next year. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 11

INTERNATIONAL COOLING EXPERIMENT: MICE GOALS: Build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the desired performance for a Neutrino Factory & test in a muon beam. Measure performance in various modes of operation. µ Instrumentation Ionization Cooling Instrumentation Multi-stage experiment. First stage currently being installed at a purpose-built muon beam at RAL. Anticipate final stage complete by ~2010 Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 12

ACCELERATION Designs for the acceleration scheme use 201 MHz SCRF 201 MHz SCRF R&D at Cornell - observed substantial Q-slope, but achieved 11 MV/m 11 MV/m may be OK for 4 GeV NF (although higher gradients preferred) 201 MHz SCRF cavity at Cornell PREACCELERATOR DESIGN 186 m 6 short 8 medium 16 long cryomodules Need to continue R&D on Q-slope, demonstrate 11 MV/m performance can be achieved routinely for several cavities, & design and prototype the required cryo-modules. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 13

DETECTOR MAGNET Detector must measure muon-sign magnetized Finegrain MINOS-like detector will work for a NF with E 20 GeV. For low energy NF (e.g. 4 GeV) need affordable large volume magnet (B ~ 0.5T) so we can use a low-z fully active detector. Eliminate large (expensive) cryostat & vac loads by using superconducting transmission line concept developed for the VLHC wrap it into a solenoid! ν Build a magnetic cavern (0.5T 34000 m 3 ). Example: two parallel solenoids with iron end-plates Initial engineering study looks promising -- must prototype & test. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 14

LOW ENERGY NF DETECTOR at DUSEL Initial simulation study performed for a 4 GeV NF detector -M det = 35 Kt, M fid = 20 Kt, -Vol= 15 15 150 m 3 - B = 0.5T 15m long scintillators triangular cross-section (base=3cm, ht=1.5cm) Fraction of CC events with µ found (%) GEANT4 Simulation + light yield extrapolated from MINERνA / D0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 Neutrino Energy (GeV) Good muons reconstruction eff. for CC interactions with E ν > 500 MeV/c. Muon momentum resolution better than few % below 3GeV/c, & charge mis-id rate < 10-4. Detector R&D needed to better understand performance & reduce cost associated with large number of channels O(10 7 ) (Note: LAr detector may also be an option) Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 15

ILLUSTRATIVE TIMELINE 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 NOVA CONSTR PROJ X R&D NOVA RUNNING PROJ X CNSTR UPGR. NOVA RUN NF R&D NF CONSTR NF RUNNING MERIT NF R&D MICE EXPT NCRF R&D 201 MHz SCRF Detector R&D IDS Study + FNAL- Specific NF ZDR & RDR Hg-Jet Target Demo. PRECONSTR. R&D 10% trans. emmit. cooling Cyro-modules for acceleration open-iris, closed-cell, high-press. RF? Magnet prototype test & cost reduction R&D Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 16

R&D SUPPORT and NF COST ESTIMATES FY07/08 annual U.S. funding level for NF+Muon Collider R&D: 5.5M$ (SWF) + 2.4M$ (M&S)=7.9M$ (of this 2M$ is Muon Collider specific) R&D estimates corresponding illustrative timelime FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 MICE M&S 0.8 1.3 0.2 0.2 NCRF M&S 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 SCRF M&S 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 DET M&S 0.1 0.2 1.0 1.0 OTHER M&S 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.5 Σ = ~10% of project cost M&S TOTAL 3.7 4.3 5.0 7.7 SWF+Indir. 8.5 10.4 12.1 13.8 TOTAL 12.2 14.7 17.1 21.5 30 30 40 40 50 4 GeV NF Cost Estimate (excluding 2 MW proton source) Start from Study 2 cost estimate scaled to account for post-study 2 improvements (ranges reflect uncertainties in scaling) ILC analysis suggest loading coeff = 2.07 for accelerator systems and 1.32 for CFS. Labor assumed 1.2 M&S Loaded estimate = 2120-2670 (FY08 M$) Unloaded estimate (M$) Target Systems Decay Channel Drift, Ph. Rot, Bunch Cooling Channel Pre-Acceleration Acceleration Storage Ring Site Utilities TOTAL (FY08 M$) 112-186 114-180 108-150 66-156 881-1151 Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 17 110 6 234 132

CONCLUDING REMARKS Sensitivity to neutrino oscillation physics motivates the development of an advanced neutrino source - see appendix We have a 10 year investment in NF R&D, with 3 generations of design study, R&D to develop the critical components, & two big international systems-demonstration experiments (MERIT & MICE). The international community is now working towards a ZDR/RDR by ~2010/2012. The R&D timeline & funding profile (last 2 slides) would enable the U.S. to step up to the plate and maintain our share of NF leadership, and give the U.S. a NF option that follows Project X. Building a muon source for a NF is a very desirable step in establishing the technologies needed for a multi-tev Muon Collider, and might provide a staged path to a multi-tev lepton collider. BB R&D has been proceeding in Europe. Physics comparisons of BB & NF are shown in the appendix. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 18

Fraction of δ Fraction of CP APPENDIX: Discovery Reach for 25 GeV NF Physics reach for 25 GeV NF looks great & if θ 13 is small may be the only option. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Summary plots from the International Scoping Study GLoBES 2007 1 0.8 0.8 sin 2 2θ 13 MASS HIERARCHY CPV Fraction of CP 0.6 0.4 GLoBES 2007 All of these (WBB, BB, NF, T2HK) next-but-one generation neutrino experiment options are necessarily ambitious. The NF is the most sensitive option for very small θ 13. Not shown in the above plots is the low-energy NF which has great sensitivity for large (and small) θ 13. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 19 Fraction of CP 1 0.6 0.4 GLoBES 2007 SPL SPL SPL T2HK T2HK T2HK 0.2 WBB0.2 WBB 0.2 WBB NF NF NF BB350 BB350 BB350 0 0 0 10 5 4 3 2 10 5 4 3 2 10 1 5 4 3 2 10 10-4 1 1 True value 10-3 of sin 2 2Θ 10-2 True value of sin 2 2Θ True value of sin 2 13 10-4 10-3 10-2 13 10-4 10-3 2Θ 10-2 13 sin 2 2θ 13

APPENDIX: Discovery Reach 4 GeV NF Physics reach for 4 GeV NF looks great for both large and small θ 13 Geer, Mena, & Pascoli, Phys. Rev. D75, 093001, (2007). Bross, Ellis, Geer, Mena,& Pascoli, hep-ph arxiv:0709.3889 OBSERVABLE CPV 99% CL OBSERVABLE MASS HIERARCHY OBSERVABLE CPV Bands cover range of run times (3-10y) & background levels (0-10 -3 ). Combines strengths of conventional Wide Band Beam (spanning several oscillations) with low systematics of NF. If sin 2 θ 13 > few x 10-3 can go well beyond discovery, and make precision measurements. If θ 13 small, have discovery reach down to sin 2 2 θ 13 ~ few x 10-4 Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 20

APPENDIX: Statistical Precision 4 GeV NF Wrong-sign µ Rates at L=1280 km for normal (inverted) hierarchies & θ 13 =8 o 20 Kt 3 years 20 Kt 10 years If θ 13 is large, the signal data samples in a 20 Kt NF detector would be a few 10 3 a few 10 4. Backgrounds would be expected to be O(10-3 ) of the CC rate. Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 21

APENDIX: Precision Disappearance Measurements Physics reach plots are based on the ν e ν µ channel. There is also the ν µ disappearance channel, which also offers precision. 0.0028 θ 13 = 8 o θ 13 = 3 o m 13 2 0.0026 0.0024 σ( m 132 ) ~ 1-2% 0.0022 0.4 0.5 0.6 sin 2 θ 23 The m 2 sensitivity might be good enough to be able to determine the mass hierarchy even if θ 13 = 0! (Note: P(ν µ ν µ ) depends on both m 2 13 and m2 23, & with sufficient sensitivity can determine who is larger than who). Steve Geer SLAC P5 Meeting February, 2008 page 22

APENDIX: Relationship between NF & Muon Collider R&D (Upgradable to 2MW) PROJECT X Rebunch Target Decay Muon Collider R&D Hall Cool Phase Rot. & Bunch MUON COLLIDER TEST FACILITY NEUTRINO FACTORY PROJECT Pre-Accel 0.2 0.8 GeV ν RLA (1 4 GeV) 4 GeV Ring Far Detector at Homestake

APENDIX: Staging from NF to 1.5-4 TeV Muon Collider To DUS EL NF