Blood Alcohol Determination using Static Headspace Analysis with Optimized Sample Throughput

Similar documents
Optimizing of Volatile Organic Compound Determination by Static Headspace Sampling

Analysis of Low Level Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Anne Jurek

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s

Optimizing Standard Preparation

A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260

Maximizing Production While Minimizing Costs

Kendrick mass = IUPAC mass x (14/ ) (1) Kendrick mass defect = nominal Kendrick mass exact Kendrick mass (2)

Static Headspace Blood Alcohol Analysis with the G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

Forensic Toxicology. Analysis of Ethanol in Blood using Master SHS Static Headspace Sampler and Master GC Gas Chromatograph APPLICATION NOTE

Analysis of Trace (mg/kg) Thiophene in Benzene Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionization Detection Application

Characterisation of allergens in cosmetics by GC GC TOF MS with Select-eV variable-energy electron ionisation

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek

A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer

Application. Gas Chromatography February Introduction

Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection Using USEPA Method 8260 Application Note

Analysis of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Utilizing the Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70

Evaluation of a New Analytical Trap for Gasoline Range Organics Analysis

Determination of Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air Using Agilent 7667A mini TD and 7820A GC

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Automated Sample Preparation of Headspace Standards Using the Agilent 7696 WorkBench

Analysis of Ethanol and Isotopomers by 240 Quadrupole Ion Trap GC/MS

Analysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System

ANNE JUREK. Abstract: soils and are found. in can also with GC/MS. poster. in series. option for. There are problems. analytes. in methanol.

Optimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to

Analysis of complex petrochemicals by GC GC TOF MS with Select-eV variable-energy electron ionisation

Sensitive Detection of 2-MIB and Geosmin in Drinking Water

The Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note

The Analysis of Trace Contaminants in High Purity Ethylene and Propylene Using GC/MS. Application. Agilent Technologies/Wasson ECE Monomer Analyzer

Quantification of Pesticides in Food without Calibration using GC/FID with the Polyarc Reactor

Sulfotepp impurities in Chlorpyrifos EC formulations

VOC Analysis of Water-Based Coatings by Headspace-Gas Chromatography

FORMIC ACID in URINE by GC/MS-headspace - Code GC74010

The Focus Robotic Sample Processor as a Tool for the Multiple Analysis of Samples using Complementary Techniques

Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C

Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis

Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications

Application Note. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry/Food Safety. Abstract. Authors

Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD

INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical

Simultaneous Compound Identification and Quantification with Parallel Polyarc /FID and MS

Exploring the Benefits of Automated Unattended Sample Derivatization Prior to Gas Chromatography Analysis

USP <467> Headspace Residual Solvent Assay with a HT3 Headspace Instrument

A Fast, Simple FET Headspace GC-FID Technique for Determining Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

US EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals (USP<467>) with Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus and HS-10 Headspace Sampler

Determination of Off-Odor Compounds in Drinking Water Using an SPME Device with Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

Application Note. Author. Abstract. Introduction. Hydrocarbon Processing

Fast USEPA 8270 Semivolatiles Analysis Using the 6890/5973 inert GC/MSD with Performance Electronics Application

Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1

Fast Gas Chromatography using Heated Headspace Gas Auto Sampling Techniques: Ethylene Oxide and 1,4-Dioxane in Fatty Acids

Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source

Fast Analysis of Aromatic Solvent with 0.18 mm ID GC column. Application. Authors. Introduction. Abstract. Gas Chromatography

Analyze Hydrocarbon Impurities in 1,3-Butadiene with an Agilent J&W GS-Alumina PT Column

Fast, Quantitative Analysis of Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

A Fast, Simple FET Headspace GC-FID Technique for Determining Residual Solvents in Cannabis Concentrates

NEW Rtx -BAC Plus 1 and Rtx -BAC Plus 2 Columns

US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS

TRICHLOROETHYLENE IN URINE BY GC/MS Headspace Code GC16110

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE IN URINE BY GC/MS Headspace Code GC15010

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

BUTYL ALCOHOL in urine by GC-FID Code GC05510

Analysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler

Applying the Technology of the TurboMatrix 650 ATD to the Analysis of Liquid Accelerants in Arson Investigation

Validation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

Hydrogen as a Carrier Gas in the Analysis of Polar/Non-Polar Compounds Using the Polyarc System. Application Note. Author. Introduction.

Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF GC-FID METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ETHANOL RESIDUE IN MARJORAM OINTMENT

Cerno Bioscience MassWorks: Acquiring Calibration Data on Agilent GC/MSDs

Study of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace

High-Speed Environmental Analysis Using the Agilent 7500cx with Integrated Sample Introduction System Discrete Sampling (ISIS DS)

PA-DEP 3686, Rev. 1. Light Hydrocarbons in Aqueous Samples via Headspace and Gas Chromatography with Flame Ionization Detection (GC/FID)

An Advanced Base Deactivated Capillary Column for analysis of Volatile amines Ammonia and Alcohols.

Analysis of E.coli Tryptic Digest and Intact Protein Using the Agilent 1290 Infinity 2D-LC Solution with Diode Array Detection and Q-TOF LC/MS

A Single Calibration for Waters and Soil Samples Performing EPA Method Anne Jurek Applications Chemist

UCMR 3 Low-Level VOC Analysis by Purge and Trap Concentration and GC/MS using Selective Ion Monitoring

Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (GC)

Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System

DIQUAT DIBROMIDE. The Determination of Ethylene Dibromide in Diquat Dibromide and Diquat Dibromide / Paraquat Dichloride SL Formulations

Analysis of Biomarkers in Crude Oil Using the Agilent 7200 GC/Q-TOF

Rtx-BAC Plus 1 and Rtx-BAC Plus 2 Columns Advanced Technology for Fast, Reliable Measurement of Alcohol in Blood

METHYLISOBUTYLKETONE (4-methyl-2 pentanone) IN URINE BY GC/MS Headspace Code GC10510

Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter <467> Methodology

Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water and Soil by EPA Method 8260 with the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler

Accurate Analysis of Fuel Ethers and Oxygenates in a Single Injection without Calibration Standards using GC- Polyarc/FID. Application Note.

Performance characteristics of the Agilent 1290 Infinity Quaternary Pump

Determination of 17 Organotin Compounds in Beverages Using Triple Quadrupole GC-MS/MS System

Analysis of Terpenes in Cannabis Using the Agilent 7697A/7890B/5977B Headspace GC-MSD System

Identification and Quantitation of PCB Aroclor Mixtures in a Single Run Using the Agilent 7000B Triple Quadrupole GC/MS

A Newly Approved ASTM Standard For Analysis of Thiophene in Benzene Using a Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD)

Automated Sample Preparation in Quality Control of Eye-Drop Formulation

System and JUREK ANNE. Introduction: in an in purge and. trap sampling. Discussion: As part of. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.

Macrolides in Honey Using Agilent Bond Elut Plexa SPE, Poroshell 120, and LC/MS/MS

The Determination of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals Using the Agilent G1888 Network Headspace Sampler Application

METHYLETHYLKETONE (M.E.K.) IN URINE BY GC/MS in head space Code GC10010

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 1828 PAGE: 1 of 14 REV: 0.0 DATE: 05/12/95 ANALYSIS OF METHYL PARATHION IN CARPET SAMPLES BY GC/MS

Transcription:

JSB is an authorised partner of Blood Alcohol Determination using Static Headspace Analysis with Optimized Sample Throughput Application Note - Environmental #129 Author Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH Abstract There are several ways to determine the amount of alcohol that is in a person s system. The most common methods are breath analysis in the field and blood analysis in the lab. Blood alcohol determination in the laboratory is used predominantly when a person refuses a breath test. In order to determine blood alcohol content, a person s blood has to be withdrawn as soon as possible after the occurrence. Furthermore, the blood needs to be collected in duplicate in order to confirm the test results. This application note will examine static headspace sampling of alcohol standards using Gas Chromatography (GC) for separation and Flame Ionization Detection (FID) for analysis. The linearity of the compounds of interest will be examined and compared using a secondary column for confirmation. Additionally, as many forensic labs have an excess of samples to examine, the use of software innovations will aid in optimizing sample throughput. Introduction: Throughout the United States, it is illegal to drive when your blood alcohol level is above a certain point, most commonly 0.08%. If a driver is found to be above this level, he/she will be arrested for driving under the influence (DUI). In the field, there are assorted tests to determine a driver s level of intoxication. Most commonly, police officers use a field sobriety test and/or a breathalyzer. However, when an offender refuses to take a breathalyzer test, police are required to bring the suspect in for a blood alcohol test. Due to the complex matrix of blood, static headspace sampling is the sampling method used for blood alcohol analysis; while GC/FID is employed for analyte separation and analysis. Since the results of this sampling and analysis have the potential to be disputed in court, the testing has to be both accurate and reproducible so as to be able to stand up to scrutiny. Forensic labs that do this kind of testing not only have to be able to meet the requirements of this analysis but also are expected to optimize sample throughput in order to meet laboratory demands. The focus of this paper will be on optimizing sample throughput while maintaining both the precision and the accuracy of the analysis. Six point curves, and precision and accuracy studies will be performed on both the primary blood alcohol column and the confirmation column. Furthermore, using innovative software, a method was developed to optimize headspace sampling while preserving the GC/FID four minute cycle time.

Experimental: The sampling system used for this analysis was the EST Analytical FLEX autosampler fitted with a 2.5ml headspace syringe, while an Agilent 7890 GC/FID was used for separation and analysis. Blood alcohol analysis requires testing using two columns, one for initial testing and one for confirmation. The columns used for this study were the Restek Rtx -BAC Plus 1 and Rtx -BAC Plus 2. After the sampling and analysis systems were set up, the experimental parameters were optimized in order to shorten analysis cycle times. Refer to Tables 1 and 2 for the sampling and analysis parameters. Autosampler Method Type GC Ready GC Cycle Time Constant Heat Mode Timing Conflict Incubation Temp. Incubation Time Agitation Speed Agitation Delay Agitation Duration Wait on Input Wait Input Syringe Temperature Syringe Needle Depth Sample Depth Speed Sample Volume Sample Fill Rate Sample Fill Delay Needle Depth Speed Needle Depth Injection Rate Injection Volume Pre-Injection Delay Post-Injection Delay Injection Start Input General Sample Incubate Agitate Wait Sample Fill Injection FLEX Headspace Continue 4.1min Yes Continue 60ºC 10.1min 100% 0.1min 10.0min Yes GC Ready 70ºC 80% 20% 40% (1000µl) 10% 1.0sec 30% 90% 10% 40% (1000µl) Off Off Start Sweep Needle Needle Temperature 70ºC Syringe Pumps 5 Syringe Pump Volume 80% (2000µl) Syringe Pump Speed 50% Table 1: FLEX Autosampler Experimental Parameters

GC/FID Inlet Inlet Temp. Inlet Head Pressure Split Liner Column Oven Temp. Program Column Flow Rate Gas FID Temp. Agilent 7890 Split/Splitless 220ºC 16.105 psi 80:1 Restek SKY Liner Splitless, 2mm x 6.5 x 78.5 Rtx-BAC Plus 1 and Rtx-BAC Plus 2 30m x 0.32mm x 1.8um 40ºC hold for 4.0 min 4.0ml/min. Helium 250ºC Table 2: GC/MS Experimental Parameters Blood alcohol reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. The reagents were all of 99.5% purity. Dilutions were performed on the reagents in order to prepare a 0.01 to 0.40 g/dl curve using n-propanol as the internal standard at a 0.20 g/dl concentration. Secondary ethanol standards were purchased from Sigma Aldrich in order to confirm the calibration. Furthermore, a six component blood alcohol resolution standard was purchased from Restek in order to verify analyte resolution. Six point calibration curves, seven replicate precision and accuracy standards, secondary standard confirmation and analyte resolution studies were performed on both blood alcohol columns. Curve results are listed in Table 3, Precision and Accuracy results are listed in Tables 4 and 5, K Factor Results are presented in Table 6, Secondary Standard Recoveries are displayed in Table 7 and Table 8 shows the carryover after a 0.40g/dL standard. Finally, Figures 1 and 2 display chromatograms of compound resolution using both columns. Compound Curve %RSD Curve R^2 Curve %RSD Curve R^2 methanol 1.05.0000 3.06.0000 acetaldehyde 2.87 0.9999 1.59 0.9994 ethanol 0.89.0000 2.61.0000 isopropanol 1.79 1.0000 1.26 1.0000 acetone 1.68 1.0000 1.23 0.9997 t-butanol 2.93 1.0000 1.51 0.9999 Table 3: Curve Results 0.20g/dL Precision Filename n-propanol (IS) methanol acetaldehyde ethanol isopropanol acetone t-butanol BAC0512045.D 27831027.53 6586516.53 69348428.09 14120432.00 8476891.88 7119747.50 70623443.00 BAC0512046.D 27627995.71 6585795.85 70569173.16 14159777.66 28714439.41 68257257.50 71371253.82 BAC0512047.D 26977764.36 6512436.00 68220946.25 13910238.50 7869167.37 5948946.25 68885075.00 BAC0512048.D 27452510.86 6537740.75 70499826.60 14052526.66 28537478.13 67986082.00 71075418.75 BAC0512049.D 27959800.47 6852999.35 69347186.40 14531570.63 8883395.63 7333571.00 71025974.25 BAC0512050.D 28102019.76 6676375.27 71561616.48 14389831.71 29189818.25 69263677.63 72557142.20 BAC0512051.D 27416544.50 6568745.85 70458310.63 14139074.53 8681662.25 8130409.38 71414756.09 Ave. 27623951.88 6617229.94 70000783.94 14186207.38 8621836.13 7719955.89 70993294.73 Std. Dev. 353393.35 107349.77 1016873.28 193469.98 377549.80 967846.18 1025064.09 %RSD 1.28 1.62 1.45 1.36.32.43 1.44 Table 4: Precision and Accuracy

0.20g/dL Precision Filename n-propanol methanol acetaldehyde ethanol isopropanol acetone t-butanol BAC0509037.D 27215350.75 6607779.37 62884065.50 14025338.50 28026103.50 3619360.25 8942593.00 BAC0509038.D 26486052.38 6254403.62 62675587.14 13424178.48 27257890.00 63064290.63 67779193.50 BAC0509039.D 26813439.90 6305377.96 63032373.70 13528439.57 27474348.38 3430626.50 8353013.25 BAC0509040.D 27954990.97 6828283.74 63832186.11 14467786.90 28758979.50 64922989.25 70589107.00 BAC0509041.D 26709978.56 6439660.46 62229633.55 13795353.02 27837305.13 3371421.13 8880939.50 BAC0509042.D 26322912.11 6245267.29 62263699.99 13457283.03 27407194.50 63023459.00 68154608.88 BAC0509043.D 26837722.46 6365348.68 62472010.36 13654414.19 27603286.75 3221588.50 8444765.50 Ave. 26905778.16 6435160.16 62769936.62 13764684.81 27766443.97 3521962.18 8734888.66 Std. Dev. 502007.50 198138.87 514939.31 346749.24 471653.41 603745.58 843688.82 %RSD 1.87 3.08 0.82 2.52 1.70.95.23 Table 5: Precision and Accuracy Run # n-propanol ethanol K Factor n-propanol ethanol K Factor 1 7831028 14120432 0.394 27215351 14025339 0.388 2 27627996 14159778 0.390 26486052 13424178 0.395 3 6977764 13910239 0.388 26813440 13528440 0.396 4 27452511 14052527 0.391 27954991 14467787 0.386 5 7959800 14531571 0.385 26709979 13795353 0.387 6 28102020 14389832 0.391 26322912 13457283 0.391 7 7416545 14139075 0.388 26837722 13654414 0.393 Ave. 27623952 14186207 0.389 26905778 13764685 0.391 Std Dev. 353393 193470 0.003 502007 346749 0.004 %RSD 1.28 1.36 0.704 1.87 2.52 0.704 Table 6: K Factor Results Test % Recovery % Recovery 1 00 96 2 98 98 3 98 96 4 99 98 5 99 99 Ave. 99 97 Table 7: Secondary Standard Recoveries

Compound %Carryover %Carryover methanol.170 0.069 acetaldehyde 0.047 0.022 ethanol.150 0.069 isopropanol 0.032 0.029 acetone 0.04 0.028 t-butanol 0.018 0.015 Table 8: %Carryover after a 0.40g/dL standard Figure 1: Resolution Standard at 0.20g/dL Concentration

Figure 2: Resolution Standard at 0.20g/dL Concentration Conclusions: Static headspace sampling coupled with GC/FID analysis of blood alcohol samples is an effective tool for the detection of alcohol in blood. Using the innovative software of the FLEX autosampler, samples can be incubated for ten minutes and still have a four minute cycle time. The analytes of interest displayed excellent linearity, and precision and accuracy while recoveries of secondary standards were also very accurate. For the busy forensic lab, more sample trays can be added to the autosampler in order to increase efficiency of sample throughput making the FLEX autosampler an excellent addition to your lab. EST analytical and JSB shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with this publication. Inform ation, descriptions, and specifications in this publication are subject to change without notice Headquarters JSB International Tramstraat 15 5611 CM Eindhoven T +31 (0) 40 251 47 53 F +31 (0) 40 251 47 58 With courtesy of Zoex Europe Tramstraat 15 5611 CM Eindhoven T +31 (0) 40 257 39 72 F +31 (0) 40 251 47 58 Sales and Service Netherlands Apolloweg 2B 8239 DA Lelystad T +31 (0) 320 87 00 18 F +31 (0) 320 87 00 19 Belgium Grensstraat 7 Box 3 1831 Diegem T +32 (0) 2 721 92 11 F +32 (0) 2 720 76 22 Germany Max-Planck-Strasse 4 D-47475 Kamp-Lintfort T +49 (0) 28 42 9280 799 F +49 (0) 28 42 9732 638 UK & Ireland Cedar Court, Grove Park Business Est. White Waltham, Maidenhead Berks, SL6 3LW T +44 (0) 16 288 220 48 F +44 (0) 70 394 006 78 info@go-jsb.com www.go-jsb.com