Ideals in U(g) for locally simple Lie algebras g

Similar documents
Primitive Ideals and Unitarity

Irreducible subgroups of algebraic groups

Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers

Branching rules of unitary representations: Examples and applications to automorphic forms.

REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS

PBW for an inclusion of Lie algebras

Representations of semisimple Lie algebras

IVAN LOSEV. Lemma 1.1. (λ) O. Proof. (λ) is generated by a single vector, v λ. We have the weight decomposition (λ) =

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.

Deformations and rigidity of lattices in solvable Lie groups

Notes on p-divisible Groups

LECTURE 10: KAZHDAN-LUSZTIG BASIS AND CATEGORIES O

Category O and its basic properties

ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS

(dim Z j dim Z j 1 ) 1 j i

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER

Pseudogroups of foliations Algebraic invariants of solenoids The discriminant group Stable actions Wild actions Future work and references

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

Algebraic group actions on noncommutative spectra

LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

LECTURES ON SYMPLECTIC REFLECTION ALGEBRAS

Artin-Schelter regular algebras and the Steenrod algebra

0 A. ... A j GL nj (F q ), 1 j r

Chapter 25 Finite Simple Groups. Chapter 25 Finite Simple Groups

Finitary Permutation Groups

Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions

Some results on algebras with finite Gelfand-Kirillov dimension

GEOMETRIC STRUCTURES OF SEMISIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

Galois Theory, summary

Reducibility of generic unipotent standard modules

LECTURE 4: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (F) AND sl 2 (F)

10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz

Math 145. Codimension

SPHERICAL UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS FOR REDUCTIVE GROUPS

descends to an F -torus S T, and S M since S F ) 0 red T F

Quadraticity and Koszulity for Graded Twisted Tensor Products

Math 249B. Tits systems

LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8

Weyl Group Representations and Unitarity of Spherical Representations.

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture III

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35

REPRESENTATION THEORY. WEEKS 10 11

Vertex algebras generated by primary fields of low conformal weight

Chow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups

DETECTING RATIONAL COHOMOLOGY OF ALGEBRAIC GROUPS

Simple Lie subalgebras of locally nite associative algebras

Adelic Profinite Groups

Popa s rigidity theorems and II 1 factors without non-trivial finite index subfactors

Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order

A GEOMETRIC JACQUET FUNCTOR

COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA

arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007

Spring 2016, lecture notes by Maksym Fedorchuk 51

Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

Lemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.

ADELIC VERSION OF MARGULIS ARITHMETICITY THEOREM. Hee Oh

ne varieties (continued)

2. Prime and Maximal Ideals

Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations

THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

Math 797W Homework 4

IDEAL CLASSES AND RELATIVE INTEGERS

INVARIANT IDEALS OF ABELIAN GROUP ALGEBRAS UNDER THE MULTIPLICATIVE ACTION OF A FIELD, II

ON BASE SIZES FOR ALGEBRAIC GROUPS

A CHARACTERIZATION OF DYNKIN ELEMENTS

Maximal subgroups of exceptional groups: representing groups in groups

Representations of algebraic groups and their Lie algebras Jens Carsten Jantzen Lecture I

New York Journal of Mathematics. Cohomology of Modules in the Principal Block of a Finite Group

A Koszul category of representations of finitary Lie algebras

NOTES FOR DRAGOS: MATH 210 CLASS 12, THURS. FEB. 22

Lecture 7. This set is the set of equivalence classes of the equivalence relation on M S defined by

Tamagawa Numbers in the Function Field Case (Lecture 2)

LECTURE 4: SOERGEL S THEOREM AND SOERGEL BIMODULES

Math 210C. The representation ring

120A LECTURE OUTLINES

The Ring of Monomial Representations

LECTURE NOTES AMRITANSHU PRASAD

VARIATIONS ON THE BAER SUZUKI THEOREM. 1. Introduction

How many units can a commutative ring have?

Kazhdan s orthogonality conjecture for real reductive groups

CONJUGATE FACTORIZATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS. Communicated by Patrizia Longobardi. 1. Introduction

Spherical varieties and arc spaces

The Diamond Category of a Locally Discrete Ordered Set.

On certain family of B-modules

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

10 l-adic representations

Geometric Structure and the Local Langlands Conjecture

Extended Index. 89f depth (of a prime ideal) 121f Artin-Rees Lemma. 107f descending chain condition 74f Artinian module

Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO

Section V.6. Separability

RINGS: SUMMARY OF MATERIAL

Systems of linear equations. We start with some linear algebra. Let K be a field. We consider a system of linear homogeneous equations over K,

AFFINE ACTIONS ON NILPOTENT LIE GROUPS

x y B =. v u Note that the determinant of B is xu + yv = 1. Thus B is invertible, with inverse u y v x On the other hand, d BA = va + ub 2

An introduction to arithmetic groups. Lizhen Ji CMS, Zhejiang University Hangzhou , China & Dept of Math, Univ of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109

AN EXACT SEQUENCE FOR THE BROADHURST-KREIMER CONJECTURE

REPRESENTATION THEORY WEEK 9

Transcription:

Jacobs University Bremen Joint work with A.Petukhov Complete paper: On Ideals in the enveloping algebra of a locally simple Lie algebra, preprint 2012, arxiv:1210.0466. March 26, 2013

Base field C. Locally simple Lie algebras: g 1 g 2... g n g n+1... g n simple, lim n (dim g n ) =, g = lim n Z 1 g n. Three classes: I. g finitary (classical): sl( ) = lim n Z 2 sl(n), o( ) = lim n Z 3 o(n), sp( ) = lim n Z 2 sp(2n).

II. g diagonal: example sl(2 ) = lim n Z 1 sl(2 n ) A ( A 0 0 A Classification by A.Baranov and A.Zhilinskii (A. A. Baranov, A. G. Zhilinskii, Diagonal direct limits of semisimple Lie algebras, Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), 2749-2766) III. g general non-diagonal: example adj n ( ) No classification ) sl(n) sl(n 2 1)...

g admits no non-trivial finite-dimensional representations and Z U(g) = C. I U(g), degree filtration yields gr I S. (g), gr I is G-stable (Poisson) U(g) admits a non-zero ideal of locally infinite codimension S. (g) admits a non-zero Poisson ideal of locally infinite codimension associated variety Var(I ) = zeroes of gri Var(I ) g = lim n Z 1 g n I has locally finite codimension Var(I ) = 0

Theorem (first main result) If S. (g) admits a non-zero Poisson ideal of locally infinite codimension, then g sl( ), o( ), sp( ). Theorem (A. G. Zhilinskii, Coherent finite-type systems of inductive families of non-diagonal inclusions, (Russian) Dokl. Acad. Nauk Belarusi 36:1 (1992), 9-13, 92) If U(g) admits a non-zero ideal of locally infinite codimension, then g is diagonal. Corollary (Baranov s conjecture) If g is not diagonal, then the augmentation ideal is the only proper ideal in U(g).

Idea of proof of Theorem 1. Let I n = I U(g n ). We have Var(I n+m ) g n+m p n,m Var(I n ) g n Key Proposition: O g n+m, O G n+m orbit, p n,m (O) is not dense in gn dim(g n V n+m ) < 2(dim G n rkg n )(rkg n + 1) or 2 dim G n + 2 dim V m+n

Identify: g n = g n. Set g r n = {X g n λ C : rk(x λid Vn ) r}. We have a well-defined projective system... g r n g r n 1... for g = sl( ), o( ), sp( ). In fact, the above maps are surjective. We obtain Poisson ideals J r of S. (g) whose zero-sets are respectively lim n Z 1 g r n g. Theorem (second main result) Let g = sl( ), o( ), sp( ) and let J S. (g) be a non-zero radical Poisson ideal. Then J = J r for some r.

In the remainder g = sl( ), o( ), sp( ). Definition I U(g) is integrable if for any n, I n = I U(g n ) is the intersection of ideals of finite codimension in U(g n ). Definition (Zhilinskii) A coherent local system (cls) of simple finite-dimensional g n -modules is a set { M k n } such that n, k M k n g n 1 = k m k M k n 1. A cls is of finite type if for any fixed n it contains finitely many g n -modules M k n. A cls is irreducible if it is not the union of two cls.

The following are basic cls: for g = sl( ) : E Λ. V, L p Λ p V, L p S. (V C p ), R q Λ q (V ), R q S. ((V ) C q ), E (all modules); for g = o( ) : E Λ. V, L p Λ p V, L p S. (V C p ), R (spinor modules), E (all modules); for g = sp( ) : E Λ. V, L p Λ p V, L p S. (V C p ), E (all modules); where p, q Z 1

Product and tensor product of cls are well-defined. Moreover, any cls has the form (L 1 ) υ (R 1 ) w ((L x υ+1 1 L x υ+2 2...L x i i υ )Em (R z w+1 1 R z w+2 2...R z j j w )) for g = sl( ), and for g = o( ), for g = sp( ). For g = sl( ) AnnL 1 sense. (L 1 ) υ ((L x υ+1 1 L x υ+2 2...L x i i υ )Em R) (L 1 ) υ ((L x υ+1 1 L x υ+2 2...L x i i υ )Em ) = AnnR 1, so the notation I (υ, Q f ) makes

Theorem The correspondence Q I (υ, Q f ) is a bijection between the set of irreducible left cls and the set of prime integrable ideals in U(sl( )). The same correspondence is a bijection between the set of all irreducible cls and all prime ideals in U(g) for g = o( ), sp( ). Fact: An integrable ideal of U(g) is prime if and only if it is primitive.

Open questions: Conjecture: The augmentation ideal is the unique maximal ideal in U(sl( )); U(o( )) has two maximal ideals: the augmentation ideal and I (R); U(sp( )) has two maximal ideals: the augmentation ideal and the kernel of the homomorphism U(sp( )) W. Question: Are there non-integrable ideals in U(sl( )), U(o( ))? Question: What is a good analogue of Duflo s theorem?