Emittance Growth and Tune Spectra at PETRA III

Similar documents
Commissioning of PETRA III. Klaus Balewski on behalf of the PETRA III Team IPAC 2010, 25 May, 2010

Tapered Transitions Dominating the PETRA III Impedance Model.

Impedance & Instabilities

First Collective Effects Measurements in NSLS-II A. Blednykh Accelerator Physicist, BNL/NSLS-II Sep , 2014

Sunday morning: Beam Dynamics Issues. Session highlights and outstanding questions. M. Pivi and D. Rubin ECLOUD10 October 8-12 Cornell University

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Operational Experience with HERA

III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education

The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring

Electron Cloud in Wigglers

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **

Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies

Wakefields and Impedances I. Wakefields and Impedances I

Electron cloud effects in KEKB and ILC

Electron Cloud Studies for KEKB and ATF KEK, May 17 May 30, 2003

Critical R&D Issues for ILC Damping Rings and New Test Facilities

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

Measurements and simulations of electron-cloudinduced tune shifts and emittance growth at CESRTA

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

STUDIES OF THE ELECTRON-CLOUD-INDUCED BEAM DYNAMICS AT CESR-TA

CesrTA Status Report Mark Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration March 4, 2009 ESR

Preliminary design study of JUICE. Joint Universities International Circular Electronsynchrotron

Accelerator Design and Construction Progress of TPS Project

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Impedance and Collective Effects in Future Light Sources. Karl Bane FLS2010 Workshop 1 March 2010

SuperB: Ring Issues. U. Wienands SLAC PEP-II. U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II SuperB Workshop Frascati, 16-Mar-06

Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the 3.2 and 6.4 km ILC Damping Ring Lattice Designs

e + e Factories M. Sullivan Presented at the Particle Accelerator Conference June 25-29, 2007 in Albuquerque, New Mexico e+e- Factories

ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)

FIRST OPERATION OF THE SWISS LIGHT SOURCE

CEPC and FCCee parameters from the viewpoint of the beam-beam and electron cloud effects. K. Ohmi (KEK) IAS-HEP, HKUST, Hong Kong Jan.

STUDIES AT CESRTA OF ELECTRON-CLOUD-INDUCED BEAM DYNAMICS FOR FUTURE DAMPING RINGS

Es#ma#ons of Collec#ve Instabili#es for JLEIC

e-cloud DAFNE T. Demma INFN-LNF

n low emittance rings

Numerical study of FII in the ILC Damping Ring

Turn-by-Turn Beam Position Measurements at ANKA with LIBERA ELECTRON

1. Fifth electron-cloud workshop, ECLOUD'12, June 5 to 8, 2012 La Biodola (Isola d'elba), Italy 2. Perspectives for positron operation at PETRA III

CesrTA Program Overview

RADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING

Measurement and Modeling of Electron Cloud Trapping in the CESR Storage Ring

WG2 on ERL light sources CHESS & LEPP

Abstract. 1. Introduction

NEXT GENERATION B-FACTORIES

CESRTA Preliminary Recommendations for the ILC Damping Rings

COMMISSIONING AND STATUS OF THE DIAMOND STORAGE RING

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012 Low- alpha mode at SOLEIL 1

Terahertz Coherent Synchrotron Radiation at DAΦNE

Possible Remedies to Suppress electron cloud in ILC damping ring

ULTIMATE LHC BEAM. G. Arduini, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Luminosity Considerations for erhic

On the future plan of KEK for ILC(International Linear Collider) Junji Urakawa(KEK) Contents

Electron Cloud Studies at the Cornell Electron Storage Ring. Matt Lawson

STATUS REPORT ON STORAGE RING REALIGNMENT AT SLRI

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Plans for CESR (or Life Without CLEO)

Electron Cloud Induced Beam Dynamics at CesrTA. Kiran Sonnad

Low-Emittance Beams and Collective Effects in the ILC Damping Rings

Overview of LHC Accelerator

Exploration of a Tevatron-Sized Ultimate Light Source

SLS Status and Development of an SLS2 Upgrade

Introduction to particle accelerators

Emittance Dilution In Electron/Positron Damping Rings

JSPS Asien Science Seminar Synchrotron Radiation Science

Low Emittance Storage Ring for Light Source. Sukho Kongtawong PHY 554 Fall 2016

Boster Synchrotron COMMISSIONING RESULTS LINAC. Storage Ring. Proceedings of IPAC2011, San Sebastián, Spain

FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities

On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture

Bunch Separation with Reconance Island Buckets

STATUS OF BEPC AND PLAN OF BEPCII

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

CESR-c Status and Accelerator Physics

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

10 GeV Synchrotron Longitudinal Dynamics

BEPC AND THE FUTURE PROGRAM AT IHEP

Electron cloud studies for the CLIC damping rings

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

e + e - Linear Collider

Beam Physics at SLAC. Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department Head. July 8, 2008 SLAC Annual Program Review Page 1

Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase

Single Bunch Longitudinal Measurements of the Cornell Electron- Positron Storage Ring with the Superconducting RF Cavities *

Electron Cloud Modeling for CesrTA

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

Status of the ESR And Future Options

Summary Report: Working Group 2 Storage Ring Sources Future Light Source Workshop SLAC, March 1-5, S. Krinsky and R. Hettel

LHC Luminosity and Energy Upgrade

Electron-Cloud Theory & Simulations

1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS

A Very Large Lepton Collider in a VLHC tunnel

COMMISSIONING OF NSLS-II*

Electron cloud mitigation strategy in SuperKEKB

Accelerator R&D Opportunities: Sources and Linac. Developing expertise. D. Rubin, Cornell University

Lattices and Multi-Particle Effects in ILC Damping Rings

Canadian Light Source: Overview

Coherent Synchrotron Radiation and Short Bunches in Electron Storage Rings. G. Wüstefeld, BESSY, Berlin (Germany)

Polarized electron and positron beams at CEPC

Transcription:

Emittance Growth and Tune Spectra at PETRA III Presentation at the ECLOUD 2010 workshop Rainer Wanzenberg ECLOUD 2010 October 8-12, 2010 Statler Hotel, Cornell University Ithaca, New York USA

PETRA III - Overview Damping wigglers Wigglers Parameter Energy / GeV Circumference /m PETRA III 6 2304 Damping wigglers 10 wigglers 10 wigglers Arc 14 FODO cells Insertion Devices 1 x 10 m 8+1 DBA 3 x 5 m cells 10 x 2 m FB cavities 8 cavities Undulators Total current / ma Emittance (horz. / vert.) /nm 100 1 / 0.01 RF section 12 cavities Injection Longt. Feedback Arc RF Injection Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 2

PETRA III - Parameters Parameter PETRA III Harmonic number: h = 3840 Revolution time: 7.68 micro sec Energy / GeV 6 Circumference /m 2304 Bunch positions: 960 RF Frequency / MHz 500 (8 ns bunch to bunch spacing) RF harmonic number RF Voltage / MV Momentum compaction Synchrotron tune Total current / ma Number of bunches 960 40 Bunch population / 10 10 0.5 12 Bunch separation / ns Emittance (horz. / vert.) /nm Bunch length / mm Damping time H/V/L / ms 3840 20 1.22 10-3 0.049 100 8 1 / 0.01 12 16 / 16 / 8 192 PETRA III is running with positrons! Damping wigglers Number 20 L wiggler = 4 m B = 1.5 T λ = 0.2 m ε x : 4.5 1 nm rad Machine can be operated w/o wigglers 80 m Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 3

PETRA III Commissioning / First user runs 2009 2010 > April 10 May 03, 2009 First stored beam (April 13) First light from a undulator (April 30) commissioning BPM electronics First optics checks > May 20 June 25, 2009 Operation without wigglers work on optics, orbit, beam based alignment > July 6, 2009 - Operation with wigglers with all (2 x 10) wigglers from Aug 12 > Feb 18, 2010 - (with wigglers) Commissioning 3 days / week First user runs (friendly user) 4 days / week > Aug 2 Aug 7, 2010 Machine studies without wigglers Investigation of vertical emittance growth > Aug 9, 2010 - Operation with wigglers First regular users (Sep. 2010) Beam line commissioning Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 4

Current Limitations Coupled bunch instabilities: PETRA II I thres (ma) 1/τ (Hz) Z eff Long. 7 35 3.6 MΩ Horiz. 6 50 45 MΩ/m powerful broadband (BW 60MHz) feedback neccessary Vert. 6 60 54 MΩ/m PETRA III: 12 seven cell cavities which large par. shunt impedance Design 2.5 ma Single Bunch (TMCI): Petra III beam current on Aug 18, 2009 Single bunch intensities of up to 2.9 ma could be stored; Deliberately limited at this current in ordner not to damage BPM electronics Measured coherent tune shift vs, current Δ ΔI f x khz 0.23 ma Δ f y ΔI khz 1 ma Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 5

PETRA III Vacuum chamber Arc: Al, 80 mm x 40 mm Wiggler: Al, 96 mm x 17.9 mm NEG coated Undulator: Al, 57 mm x 7 mm Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 6

Vertical emittance blow up 50 ma in 70 bunches 63 ma in 70 bunches Threshold ~ 50 ma Synchrotron radiation from a bending magnet is used to image the beam spot onto a high resolution CCD camera system. (G. Kube et al., Overview of the Diagnostics Systems of Petra III, Proceedings of EPAC08, Genoa, Italy) Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 7

Vertical emittance growth (70 bunches) Vertical Tune Spectra 70 bunche (Δt B =96ns), I = 55 ma (May 11, 2010) f y f s? vert. tune f y = 39 khz Remedy for 70 bunches: ξ +5 Increase Gain of vertical feedback by a factor of 4 (spectrum bunch #12) black: longt. spectrum red: vert. spectrum blue: horz. spectrum Signal from the feedback system Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 8

Vertical emittance blow up (640 bunches) 640 bunches, 8 ns bunch spacing + gap 639 x 8 ns = 5112 ns, gap 2568 ns Tune spectrum, bunch position #274 Bunch current: Harmonic number: h = 3840 Revolution time: 7.68 micro sec Bunch positions: 960 (8 ns bunch spacing) #274 vert. tune f y = 39 khz ~ 8 khz upper side band measured emittance on May 11, 2010 Horz. 1.38 nm, total current 65 ma Vert. 128 pm Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 9

PETRA III und SPS Tune spectra PETRA 1 PRTRA III is running e+ e cloud??? SPS 640 At PETRA III tune spectra have been 70 observed with some characteristics which have been observed at the SPS in connection with electron cloud effects. 1 (K. Cornelis, The Electron-Cloud Instability in the SPS http://conf-ecloud02.web.cern.ch/conf-ecloud02/talks/cornelis.pdf) Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 10

Studies with different filling patterns (May / June 2010) 10 x 29 = 290 bunches 200 bunches + witness bunch 40 x 4 = 160 bunches bunch 4 I tot = 88 ma Almost no emittance blow up!, bunch-to-bunch spacing 16 ns + gap 144 ns Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 11

Studies without wigglers Aug. 2 7, 2010 Emittance ~ 4.5 nm rad All wigglers have been moved into the parking position (measured vert. emittance 39 pm rad) The vertical emittance growth and the sidebands are seen again! 200 bunches 10 x 29 bunches Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 12

Studies with wigglers Aug 17 and Sep 15, 2010 60 x 4 bunches 80 x 4 bunches ½ 80 x 4 bunches No emittance blow-up Emittance growth 50 ma 75 ma and upper sidebands Emittance growth and build-up of upper sidebands I = 90 ma 7 x 4 = 28 I = 75 ma Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 13

Filling pattern N x 4, 16 ns bunch spacing bunch pos. 1 3 5 7 25 27 29 31 960 144 ns 40 x 4 = 160 60 x 4 = 240 80 ns No emittance growths 80 x 4 = 320 48 ns Emittance growths I > 50 ma 200 bunches + witness bunch, upper sidesbands have been observed: May/June with wigglers, for a witness bunch about 72 ns behind the bunch train bunch pos #409 (2 nd fill) #411 (1 st fill) (96 ns behind the bunch train) Aug 5, (w/o wigglers) 56 ns behind the bunch train (bunch pos #407) Aug 17 with wigglers 56 ns behind the bunch train (bunch pos #407) Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 14

Instability threshold coasting beam model Broad band resonator model + coasting beam model *) < 1 threshold density: (L = circumference of the ring) Q ~ 5 < K λ + = beam line density in the e+ bunch PETRA III: KEK B: K = 1 8.9 x 10 12 m -3 0.5 x 10 12 m -3 (PETRA III, 960 bunches, 100 ma, KEK-B, 1200 bunches, 600 ma) 1.4 x 10 12 m -3 0.1 x 10 12 m -3 *) K. Ohmi: Electron Cloud Effect in Damping Rings of Linear Colliders 31st ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop on Electron-Cloud Effects "ECLOUD'04" K = 6.4 5 Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 15

Simulations 2003 (DESY M 03-02, Dec 2003) Simulation with ECLOUD 2.3: PETRA III, N = 0.5 10 10, bunch spacing 4 ns Al chamber, 40 x 80 mm SEY 2.2 center density 1.0 x 10 12 m -3 Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 16

Simulations 2010 ECLOUD 4.0 Simulation with ECLOUD 4.0: PETRA III, N = 0.5 10 10, bunch spacing 4 ns center density ~ 2.5 10 12 m -3 factor 2.5 larger (ECLOUD 2.3) above the threshold from coasting beam model with enhancement factor Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 17

Simulations Simulation with ECLOUD 4.0: PETRA III, N = 0.5 10 10, bunch spacing 8 ns 100 ma in 960 bunches or 66 ma in 640 bunches, SEY = 2.5 center density ~ 1.5 x 10 12 m -3 Average beam charge volume density: ρ b N = c Δt A A = area of the vacuum chamber = π x 20 mm x 40 mm Simulated cloud density ρc = 1. 8 ρ b = 0.83 x 10 12 m -3 Neutrality charge density ρc ρ b Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 18

Average charge density and tune shift # Bunches bunch spacing / ns Average density Arc / 10 12 / m 3 0.83 0.77 1.3 1.1 1.9 2.1 2 Wigg / 10 12 / m 3 1.6 1.5 2.6 2.1 3.8 4.1 4 Vert. tune shift / khz (arc density) Design 960 8 0.44 640 8 0.41 10 x 29 Current / ma 100 62 48 54 78 85 82 N / 10 10 0.5 0.47 0.8 1.3 2.3 2.5 1.2 8 0.71 200 16 From neutrality condition Predicted tune shift 0.58 Studies 16 x 10 16 1 40 x 4 16 / 144 1.1 40 x 8 8 / 136 1.1 60 x 4 90 1.8 16 / 80 1.5 2.9 0.8 80 x 4 75 1.1 16 / 48 0.9 1.8 0.5 Tune shift calculated from the average charge density (neutrality condition): ΔQ 1 C = 2 γ y r e β y ρ c PETRA III f 0 = 130 khz Δf y = 0.54 khz 10 12 m 3 The measurements indicate much larger tune shifts / side bands (about a factor 10)!? ρ c 0.54 khz / 130 khz = 0.004 Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 19

Simulations: 60 x 4 and 80 x 4 bunches Simulation with ECLOUD 4.0: PETRA III, I = 50 ma N = 1.0 10 10 and 0.75 10 10,bunch spacing 16 ns Red 60 x 4 bunches Blue 80 x 4 bunches, SEY 2.5 center density ~ 1.0 10 12 m -3 center density is similar in both cases SEY 2.0 center density ~ 0.5 10 12 m -3 Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 20

Summary: Vertical Emittance Growth > A vert. Emittance growth (factor 2 4) has been observed at PETRA III for long bunch trains with 8 ns and 16 ns bunch to bunch spacing at a total current of about 50 ma > There a upper-sidebands in the tune spectra with a clear build-up along the bunch train > The measured tune spectra show some characteristics which have been observed at other storage rings in connection with electron cloud effects. > The tune shift is much larger than expected from estimates based on the average charge density (neutrality condition) > For user runs a filling pattern has been found (40 x 4 bunches and 60 x 4 bunches) without a significant emittance growth > Simulations indicate the same center density for both filling patterns Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 21

Acknowledgment I would like to thank J. Crittenden for discussions (via e-mail) and his ecloud simulations for PETRA III. I would like to thank my colleagues from DESY Klaus Balewski, Michael Bieler, Joachim Keil, Alexander Kling, Gajendar Kumar Sahoo, who provided valuable data and facts for my talk. Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 22

Thank you for your attention! Rainer Wanzenberg PETRA III Oct., 2010 Page 23