Triregular Leftmost without Loop and Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Graph Algebra of Type (2,0)

Similar documents
Identities in (X(YZ))Z with Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Type (2,0)

Classes of Universal Graphs Definable by Universal Graph Algebra Quasi-Identities

Equational Logic. Chapter Syntax Terms and Term Algebras

Fuzzy M-solid subvarieties

GENERATING SETS AND DECOMPOSITIONS FOR IDEMPOTENT TREE LANGUAGES

Minimal Characteristic Algebras for Rectangular k-normal Identities

On the Complete Join of Permutative Combinatorial Rees-Sushkevich Varieties

EQUATIONS OF TOURNAMENTS ARE NOT FINITELY BASED

Section Summary. Relations and Functions Properties of Relations. Combining Relations

Closure operators on sets and algebraic lattices

Universal Algebra for Logics

SIMPLE LOGICS FOR BASIC ALGEBRAS

MULTI-HYPERSUBSTITUTIONS AND COLOURED SOLID VARIETIES arxiv: v2 [math.ra] 29 Nov 2008

THE LATTICE OF SUBVARIETIES OF SEMILATTICE ORDERED ALGEBRAS

DISTRIBUTIVE, STANDARD AND NEUTRAL ELEMENTS IN TRELLISES. 1. Introduction

Introduction to Kleene Algebras

1. Quivers and their representations: Basic definitions and examples.

Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B. Example:

Section 7.1 Relations and Their Properties. Definition: A binary relation R from a set A to a set B is a subset R A B.

Introduction to generalized topological spaces

FREE STEINER LOOPS. Smile Markovski, Ana Sokolova Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Republic of Macedonia

P.S. Gevorgyan and S.D. Iliadis. 1. Introduction

Semigroup, monoid and group models of groupoid identities. 1. Introduction

F -inverse covers of E-unitary inverse monoids

The variety of commutative additively and multiplicatively idempotent semirings

A Structure of KK-Algebras and its Properties

Unary Automatic Graphs: An Algorithmic Perspective 1

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska

Sets and Motivation for Boolean algebra

NEW CLASSES OF SET-THEORETIC COMPLETE INTERSECTION MONOMIAL IDEALS

Boolean Algebra CHAPTER 15

Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics. Chapter 9 Relations

ClC (X ) : X ω X } C. (11)

Finite Simple Abelian Algebras are Strictly Simple

DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES ON GRAPH ORIENTATIONS

Lecture Notes: Selected Topics in Discrete Structures. Ulf Nilsson

D-bounded Distance-Regular Graphs

ON VARIETIES OF LEFT DISTRIBUTIVE LEFT IDEMPOTENT GROUPOIDS

Jónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

On the Structure of Rough Approximations

On star forest ascending subgraph decomposition

ACLT: Algebra, Categories, Logic in Topology - Grothendieck's generalized topological spaces (toposes)

Characterizing the Equational Theory

When does a semiring become a residuated lattice?

CHAPTER 4. βs as a semigroup

ANNIHILATOR IDEALS IN ALMOST SEMILATTICE

A MODEL-THEORETIC PROOF OF HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ

The Essentially Equational Theory of Horn Classes

FREE SYSTEMS OF ALGEBRAS AND ULTRACLOSED CLASSES

Tutorial Obtain the principal disjunctive normal form and principal conjunction form of the statement

Finite homogeneous and lattice ordered effect algebras

20 Group Homomorphisms

Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table

Completeness of Star-Continuity

A note on congruence lattices of slim semimodular

A CHARACTERIZATION OF LOCALLY FINITE VARIETIES THAT SATISFY A NONTRIVIAL CONGRUENCE IDENTITY

Remarks on categorical equivalence of finite unary algebras

cse303 ELEMENTS OF THE THEORY OF COMPUTATION Professor Anita Wasilewska

1 Introduction We adopt the terminology of [1]. Let D be a digraph, consisting of a set V (D) of vertices and a set E(D) V (D) V (D) of edges. For a n

A Note on Generalized Topology

arxiv: v1 [math.gr] 10 Sep 2018

On injective constructions of S-semigroups. Jan Paseka Masaryk University

Chapter 9: Relations Relations

ON FUZZY TOPOLOGICAL BCC-ALGEBRAS 1

COMBINATORIAL GROUP THEORY NOTES

HOW IS A CHORDAL GRAPH LIKE A SUPERSOLVABLE BINARY MATROID?

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.gm] 21 Jan 2005

A NEW COMBINATORIAL FORMULA FOR CLUSTER MONOMIALS OF EQUIORIENTED TYPE A QUIVERS

SYNTACTIC SEMIGROUP PROBLEM FOR THE SEMIGROUP REDUCTS OF AFFINE NEAR-SEMIRINGS OVER BRANDT SEMIGROUPS

Tutorial on Universal Algebra, Mal cev Conditions, and Finite Relational Structures: Lecture I

Axioms of Kleene Algebra

Partial cubes: structures, characterizations, and constructions

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES

Class Notes on Poset Theory Johan G. Belinfante Revised 1995 May 21

Anna University, Chennai, November/December 2012

MITSCH S ORDER AND INCLUSION FOR BINARY RELATIONS

BINARY REPRESENTATIONS OF ALGEBRAS WITH AT MOST TWO BINARY OPERATIONS. A CAYLEY THEOREM FOR DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES

Foundations of Mathematics

From Residuated Lattices to Boolean Algebras with Operators

On α-embedded subsets of products

3. Abstract Boolean Algebras

THE MAXIMAL SUBGROUPS AND THE COMPLEXITY OF THE FLOW SEMIGROUP OF FINITE (DI)GRAPHS

Relation between Graphs

A GENERAL THEORY OF ZERO-DIVISOR GRAPHS OVER A COMMUTATIVE RING. David F. Anderson and Elizabeth F. Lewis

James J. Madden LSU, Baton Rouge. Dedication: To the memory of Paul Conrad.

Reachability relations and the structure of transitive digraphs

A collection of topological Ramsey spaces of trees and their application to profinite graph theory

Relations on Hypergraphs

The Blok-Ferreirim theorem for normal GBL-algebras and its application

NOTES ON PLANAR SEMIMODULAR LATTICES. IV. THE SIZE OF A MINIMAL CONGRUENCE LATTICE REPRESENTATION WITH RECTANGULAR LATTICES

SUBLATTICES OF LATTICES OF ORDER-CONVEX SETS, III. THE CASE OF TOTALLY ORDERED SETS

Chordal Graphs, Interval Graphs, and wqo

Note on p-competition Graphs and Paths

Domination in Cayley Digraphs of Right and Left Groups

The cocycle lattice of binary matroids

THE CLOSED-POINT ZARISKI TOPOLOGY FOR IRREDUCIBLE REPRESENTATIONS. K. R. Goodearl and E. S. Letzter

Myung-Hwan Kim and Byeong-Kweon Oh. Department of Mathematics, Seoul National University, Seoul , Korea

7. Homotopy and the Fundamental Group

Arc-transitive pentavalent graphs of order 4pq

Transcription:

International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 12, 557-571 Triregular Leftmost without Loop and Reverse Arc Graph Varieties of Graph Algebra of Type (2,0) Montri Thongmoon and Tiang Poomsa-ard Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand montri.t@msu.ac.th, tiang@kku.ac.th Abstract Graph algebras establish a connection between directed graphs without multiple edges and special universal algebras of type (2,0). We say that a graph G satisfies a term equation s t if the corresponding graph algebra A(G) satisfies s t. A class of graph algebras V is called a graph variety if V = Mod g Σ where Σ is a subset of T (X) T (X). A graph variety V = Mod g Σ is called a triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph variety if Σ is a set of triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc term equations. In this paper we characterize all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties. For varieties and other basic concept of universal algebra see e.g. [2] Mathematics Subject Classification: 05B25, 08B15 Keywords: varieties, triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties, term, binary algebra, graph algebra 1 Introduction. Graph algebras have been invented in [12] to obtain examples of nonfinitely based finite algebras. To recall this concept, let G = (V, E) be a (directed) graph with the vertex set V and the set of edges E V V. Define the graph algebra A(G) corresponding to G with the underlying set V { }, where is a symbol outside V, and with two basic operations, namely a nullary operation pointing to and a binary one denoted by juxtaposition, given for

558 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard u, v V { } by uv = { u, if (u, v) E,, otherwise. In [11] graph varieties had been investigated for finite undirected graphs in order to get graph theoretic results (structure theorems) from universal algebra via graph algebras. In [10] these investigations are extended to arbitrary (finite) directed graphs where the authors ask for a graph theoretic characterization of graph varieties, i.e., of classes of graphs which can be defined by term equations for their corresponding graph algebras. The answer is a theorem of Birkhoff-type, which uses graph theoretic closure operations. A class of finite directed graphs is equational (i.e., a graph variety) if and only if it is closed with respect to finite restricted pointed subproducts and isomorphic copies. In [6] T. Poomsa-ard characterized hyperidentitis in the class of associative graph algebras. In [7], [8] T. Poomsa-ard, J. Wetweerapong and C. Samartkoon characterized hyperidentitis in the class of idempotent graph algebras and the class of transitive graph algebras respectively. In [4] J. Khampakdee and T. Poomsa-ard characterized hyperidentities in the class of (xy)x x(yy). In [3] M. Krapeedaeng and T. Poomsa-ard characterized all biregular leftmost graph varieties. In [1] A. Anantpinitwatna and T. Poomsa-ard characterized hyperidentities in biregular leftmost graph varieties. We say that a graph variety V = Mod g Σ is called a triregular without loop and reverse arc graph variety if Σ is a set of triregular without loop and reverse arc term equations. In this paper we characterize all triregular without loop and reverse arc graph varieties. 2 Terms and graph varieties In [9] R. Pöschel was introduced terms for graph algebras, the underlying formal language has to contain a binary operation symbol (juxtaposition) and a symbol for the constant (denoted by, too). Definition 2.1. The set T (X) of all terms over the alphabet is defined inductively as follows: X = {x 1, x 2, x 3,...} (i) every variable x i, i = 1, 2, 3,..., and are terms; (ii) if t 1 and t 2 are terms, then t 1 t 2 is a term;

Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 559 (iii) T (X) is the set of all terms which can be obtained from (i) and (ii) in finitely many steps. Terms built up from the two-element set X 2 = {x 1, x 2 } of variables are thus binary terms. We denote the set of all binary terms by T (X 2 ). The leftmost variable of a term t is denoted by L(t) and rightmost variable of a term t is denoted by R(t). A term, in which the symbol occurs is called a trivial term. Definition 2.2. For each non-trivial term t of type τ = (2, 0) one can define a directed graph G(t) = (V (t), E(t)), where the vertex set V (t) is the set of all variables occurring in t and the edge set E(t) is defined inductively by E(t) = φ if t is a variable and E(t 1 t 2 ) = E(t 1 ) E(t 2 ) {(L(t 1 ), L(t 2 ))} where t = t 1 t 2 is a compound term. L(t) is called the root of the graph G(t), and the pair (G(t), L(t)) is the rooted graph corresponding to t. Formally, we assign the empty graph φ to every trivial term t. Definition 2.3. A non-trivial term t of type τ = (2, 0) is called a term without loop and reverse arc if and only if for any x V (t), (x, x) / E(t) and for any x, y V (t) with x y if (x, y) E(t), then (y, x) / E(t). A term equation s t of type τ = (2, 0) is called triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc term equation if and only if V (s) = V (t), V (t) = 3, L(s) = L(t) and s, t are terms without loop and reverse arc. Definition 2.4. We say that a graph G = (V, E) satisfies a term equation s t if the corresponding graph algebra A(G) satisfies s t (i.e., we have s = t for every assignment V (s) V (t) V { }), and in this case, we write G = s t. Given a class G of graphs and a set Σ of term equations (i.e., Σ T (X) T (X)) we introduce the following notation: G = Σ if G = s t for all s t Σ, G = s t if G = s t for all G G, G = Σ if G = Σ for all G G, IdG = {s t s, t T (X), G = s t}, Mod g Σ = {G G is a graph and G = Σ}, V g (G) = Mod g IdG. V g (G) is called the graph variety generated by G and G is called graph variety if V g (G) = G. G is called equational if there exists a set Σ of term equations such that G = Mod g Σ. Obviously V g (G) = G if and only if G is an equational class. In [9] it was shown that any non-trivial term t over the class of graph algebras has a uniquely determined normal form term NF (t) and there is an

560 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard algorithm to construct the normal form term to a given term t. Now, we want to describe how to construct the normal form term. Let t be a non-trivial term. The normal form term of t is the term NF (t) constructed by the following algorithm: (i) Construct G(t) = (V (t), E(t)). (ii) Construct for every x V (t) the list l x = (x i1,..., x ik(x) ) of all outneighbors (i.e., (x, x ij ) E(t), 1 j k(x)) ordered by increasing indices i 1... i k(x) and let s x be the term (...((xx i1 )x i2 )...x ik(x) ). (iii) Starting with x := L(t), Z := V (t), s := L(t), choose the variable x i Z V (s) with the least index i, substitute the first occurrence of x i by the term s xi, denote the resulting term again by s and put Z := Z \ {x i }. Continue this procedure while Z φ. The resulting term is the normal form NF (t). The algorithm stops after a finite number of steps, since G(t) is a rooted graph. Without difficulties one shows G(NF (t)) = G(t), L(NF (t)) = L(t). Definition 2.5. Let G = (V, E) and G = (V, E ) be graphs. A homomorphism h from G into G is a mapping h : V V carrying edges to edges,that is, for which (u, v) E implies (h(u), h(v)) E. Further in [5] it was proved the following proposition: Proposition 2.1. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and let h : X { } V { } be an evaluation of the variables such that h( ) =. Consider the canonical extension of h to the set of all terms. Then there holds: if t is a trivial term then h(t) =. Otherwise, if h : G(t) G is a homomorphism of graphs, then h(t) = h(l(t)), and if h is not a homomorphism of graphs, then h(t) =. By the property of the normal form term and Proposition 2.1, we have the following proposition: Proposition 2.2. Let G = (V, E) be a graph s and t be non-trivial terms. Then G = s t if and only if G = NF (s) NF (t). 3 Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arcs graph varieties We see that if s and t are terms such that V (s) V (t) or L(s) L(t), then there exists a complete graph (a complete graph which has more than one vertices) which does not belong to the graph variety Mod g {s t}. In this study we will investigate only the graph varieties which contain all complete graphs. By Proposition 2.2, we see that for any Σ T (X) T (X) and Σ is the set of term equations NF (s) NF (t), if s t Σ. Then Mod g Σ

Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 561 and Mod g Σ are the same graph variety. Hence if we want to find all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arcs graph varieties, then it is enough to find all graph varieties Mod g Σ such that Σ is any subset of T T, where T = {s 1, s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5, s 6, s 7 } and s 1 = x(yz), s 2 = x(zy), s 3 = (xy)z, s 4 = x(y(zx)), s 5 = x(z(yx)), s 6 = (x(yz))z, s 7 = (xy)(zy)}. Clearly, for each i = 1, 2, 3,..., 7, K 0 = Mod g {s i s i } is the set of all graph algebras. In [5] it was proved: Proposition 3.1. Let s and t be non-trivial terms from T (X) with variables V (s) = V (t) = {x 0, x 1,..., x n } and L(s) = L(t). Then a graph G = (V, E) satisfies s t if and only if the graph algebra A(G) has the following property: A mapping h : V (s) V is a homomorphism from G(s) into G iff it is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Proposition 3.1 gives a method to check whether a graph G = (V, E) satisfies the term equation s t. The following are all graphs with at most two vertices which satisfy at least one term equation s i s j, i = 1, 2,..., 7, j = 1, 2,..., 7, i j. G 1 G 2 G 3 G 4 G 5 G 6 G 7 G 8 G 9 The following are all connected graphs with three vertices which each edges are above graphs. G 10 G 11 G 12 G 13 G 14 G 15 G 16 G 17 G 18 G 19 G 20 G 21 G 22 G 23

562 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard G 27 G 24 G 25 G 26 G 28 G 29 G 30 G 31 G 32 G 33 G 34 G 35 G 36 G 37 G 38 G 39 G 40 G 41 G 42 G 43 G 44 G 45 G 46 G 47 G 48 G 49 G 50 G 51 G 52 G 53 G 54 G 55 G 56 G 57 G 58 G 59 G 60 G 61 G 62 G 63 G 64 G 65 G 66 G 67 G 68 G 69 G 70 G 71 G 72

Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 563 G 73 G 74 G 75 G 76 G 77 G 78 G 79 G 80 G 81 G 82 G 83 G 84 G 85 G 86 G 87 G 88 G 89 G 90 G 91 G 92 G 93 G 94 G 95 Then all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties are characterized by the following theorems: Theorem 3.1. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 1 = Mod g {x(yz) x(zy)}. Then G K 1 if and only if for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b) E. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 1 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(zy) and let h : V (s) V be a function such that h(x) = a, h(y) = b and h(z) = c. We see that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. By Proposition 3.1, we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, z), (z, y) E(t), we have (h(x), h(z)) = (a, c) E and (h(z), h(y)) = (c, b) E. In the same way, if (a, c), (c, b) E, then we can prove that (a, b), (b, c) E. Conversely, suppose that G = (V, E) be a graph which has property that, for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(zy) and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since

564 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. By assumption we get (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. In the same way we can prove that, if h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G, then it is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get A(G) satisfies s t. By Theorem 3.1, we see that the graphs which belong to K 1 are the graphs G i A, A = { G 1,G 2,G 3,G 4,G 9,G 10,G 11,G 14,G 24,G 26,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.2. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 2 = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)z}. Then G K 2 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, b) E, then (b, c) E if and only if (a, c) E. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 2 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = (xy)z and let h : V (s) V be a function such that h(x) = a, h(y) = b and h(z) = c. We see that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. By Proposition 3.1, we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, z) E(t), we have (h(x), h(z)) = (a, c) E. In the same way, if (a, b), (a, c) E, then we can prove that (b, c) E. Conversely, suppose that G = (V, E) be a graph which has property that, for any a, b, c V, if (a, b) E, then (b, c) E if and only if (a, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = (xy)z and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. By assumption we get (h(x), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. In the same way we can prove that, if h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G, then it is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get A(G) satisfies s t. By Theorem 3.2, we see that the graphs which belong to K 2 are the graphs G i B, B = {G 1,G 2,G 4,G 9,G 14,G 26,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.3. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 3 = Mod g {x(yz) x(y(zx))}. Then G K 3 if and only if for any a, b, c V if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (c, a) E. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 3 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Let s and t be non-trivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(y(zx)) and let h : V (s) V be a function such that h(x) = a, h(y) = b and h(z) = c. We see that h is a homomorphism from G(s)

Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 565 into G. By Proposition 3.1, we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (z, x) E(t), we have (h(z), h(x)) = (c, a) E. Conversely, suppose that G = (V, E) be a graph which has property that, for any a, b, c V, if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (c, a) E. Let s and t be nontrivial terms such that s = x(yz) and t = x(y(zx)) and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. By assumption we get (h(z), h(x)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Clearly that, if h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G, then it is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get A(G) satisfies s t. By Theorem 3.3, we see that the graphs which belong to K 3 are the graphs G i C, C = { G 1,G 2 G 3,G 9,G 10,G 24,G 66,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.4. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 4 = Mod g {x(yz) x(z(yx))}. Then G K 4 if and only if for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.1. By Theorem 3.4, we see that the graphs which belong to K 4 are the graphs G i D, D = {G 1,G 2,G 3,G 9,G 10,G 24,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.5. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 5 = Mod g {x(yz) (x(yz))z}. Then G K 5 if and only if for any a, b, c V if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (a, c) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.3. By Theorem 3.5, we see that the graphs which belong to K 5 are the graphs G i E, E = {G 1,G 2,...,G 6,G 9,...,G 15,G 24,...,G 29,G 52,...,G 59,G 64,G 65,G 82,G 83, G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.6. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 6 = Mod g {(xy)z x(y(zx))}. Then G K 6 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, b) E, then (a, c) E if and only if (b, c), (c, a) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.2. By Theorem 3.6, we see that the graphs which belong to K 6 are the graphs G i F, F = {G 1,G 2,G 9,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs.

566 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard Theorem 3.7. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 7 = Mod g {(xy)z (x(yz))z}. Then G K 7 if and only if for any a, b, c V if (a, b), (a, c) E, then (b, c) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.3. By Theorem 3.7, we see that the graphs which belong to K 7 are the graphs G i H, H = {G 1,G 2,G 4,G 9,G 14,G 26,G 34,G 51,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.8. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 8 = Mod g {x(y(zx)) x(z(yx))}. Then G K 8 if and only if for any a, b, c V, (a, b), (b, c), (c, a) E if and only if (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.1. By Theorem 3.8, we see that the graphs which belong to K 8 are the graphs G i I, I = {G 1,G 2,...,G 65,G 78,...;G 83,G 92,...,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.9. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 9 = Mod g {x(y(zx)) (x(yz))z}. Then G K 9 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, b), (b, c) E, then (c, a) E if and only if (a, c) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.2. By Theorem 3.9, we see that the graphs which belong to K 9 are the graphs G i J, J = {G 1,G 2,G 3,G 7,G 8,G 9,G 10,G 16,G 24,G 30,G 31,G 38,G 39,G 46,...,G 51, G 92,...,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Theorem 3.10. Let G = (V, E) be a graph and K 10 = Mod g {(x(yz))z (xy)(zy)}. Then G K 10 if and only if for any a, b, c V, if (a, c), (a, b) E, then (b, c) E if and only if (c, b) E. Proof. The proof is similar as the proof of Theorem 3.2. By Theorem 3.10, we see that the graphs which belong to K 10 are the graphs G i L, L = {G 1,...,G 4,G 7,...,G 11,G 14,G 16,G 19, G 24,G 26,G 30,G 31,G 32,G 34,G 38, G 39,G 41,G 43,G 46,...,G 52,G 55,G 60, G 61,G 64,G 66,G 70,G 73,G 78,G 80,G 89,G 92,...G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. By checking the graphs in K 1 and the graphs in Mod g {x(yz) (xy)(zy)}, we found that they are the same graph variety. After that we use the Proposition 3.1 recheck again as the following theorem:

Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 567 Theorem 3.11. Let K = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)(zy)}. Then K = K 1. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 1. Let s, t and t are terms such that s = x(yz), t = (xy)(zy) and t = x(zy) and let h : V (s) V be a function. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. Since G K 1. By Theorem 3.1 we have (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. So h is a homomorphism from G(t ) into G. From (h(x), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E, we have that h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, y), (z, y), (x, z) E(t), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(z), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)) E. Since G K 1 and (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. By Theorem 3.1 we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. So we have that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get G K. Let G K. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since (x, y), (y, z) E(s), we have (h(x), h(y)), (h(y), h(z)) E. Since G K. By Proposition 3.1 we have h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (z, y), (x, z) E(t), we get (h(z), h(y)), (h(x), h(z)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(t ) into G. Suppose that h is a homomorphism from G(t ) into G. Since (x, z), (z, y), E(t ), we have (h(x), h(z)), (h(z), h(y)) E. Let h : V (t ) V be a function such that h (x) = h(x), h (y) = h(z) and h (z) = h(y). Hence h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Since G K, we get that h is a homomorphism from G(t) into G. Since (x, z), (z, y) E(t) we have (h (x), h (z)) = (h(x), h(y)) E and (h (z), h (y)) = (h(y), h(z)) E. Hence h is a homomorphism from G(s) into G. Then, by Proposition 3.1 we get G K 1. Hence K = K 1. In the similar way, we have the following K 1 = Mod g {x(yz) x(zy)} = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)(zy)} = Mod g {x(zy) (x(yz))z}; K 2 = Mod g {x(yz) (xy)z} = Mod g {x(zy) (xy)z}; K 3 = Mod g {x(yz) x(y(zx))} = Mod g {x(zy) x(z(yx))}; K 4 = Mod g {x(yz) x(z(yx))} = Mod g {x(zy) x(y(zx))}; K 5 = Mod g {x(yz) (x(yz))z} = Mod g {x(zy) (xy)(zy)}; K 6 = Mod g {(xy)z x(y(zx))} = Mod g {(xy)z x(z(yx))};

568 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard K 7 = Mod g {(xy)z (x(yz))z} = Mod g {(xy)z (xy)(zy)}; K 9 = Mod g {x(y(zx)) (x(yz))z} = Mod g {x(y(zx)) (xy)(zy)} = Mod g {x(z(yx)) (x(yz))z} = Mod g {x(z(yx)) (xy)(zy)}. Hence there are only ten triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties Mod g {s i s j } with i j for all i = 1, 2, 3,..., 7, j = 1, 2, 3,..., 7. Since for any Σ T T, we have the triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties Mod g Σ = s t Σ Mod g{s t}. Therefore we can find all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties in the following way: At first let A = {K 0, K 1,..., K 10 }. Find the intersection between two elements of A. If there are some of them do not belong to A, then add them into A to get the set A 1. Do the same manner for A 1 to get A 2. Continuing this process until to get the set A n such that all intersection between two elements of A n belong to itself. Then, A n close under inclusion. Let K 11 = K 5 K 10. Then by Theorem 3.5 and Theorem 3.10 we see that the graphs which belong to K 11 are the graphs G i M, M = {G 1, G 2,G 3,G 4,G 9, G 10,G 11,G 14,G 24,G 26,G 52,G 55,G 64,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Let K 12 = K 7 K 9. Then by Theorem 3.7 and Theorem 3.9 we see that the graphs which belong to K 12 are the graphs G i N, N = {G 1, G 2,G 9,G 51,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Let K 13 = K 8 K 10. Then by Theorem 3.8 and Theorem 3.10 we see that the graphs which belong to K 13 are the graphs G i O, O = {G 1, G 2,G 3,G 4,G 7,G 8, G 9,G 10,G 11,G 14, G 16,G 19,G 24,G 26,G 30,G 31,G 32,G 34,G 38, G 39,G 41,G 43,G 46,G 47, G 48,G 49,G 50,G 51, G 52,G 55,G 60,G 61,G 64,G 78,G 80,G 92,G 93,G 94,G 95 } and all graphs such that every induced subgraph with at most three vertices of each component is one of these graphs. Further we prove that K 3 K 9 = K 4 and K 3 K 10 as the following theorems. Theorem 3.12. K 3 K 9 = K 4. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Suppose that G K 4. For any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Since G K 4, we have (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. From (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 4 we have (c, a) E. Hence G K 3. For any a, b, c V, suppose (a, b), (b, c), (c, a) E. From (b, c), (c, a) E and G K 4, we have (a, c) E. Suppose (a, b), (b, c), (a, c) E. From (a, b), (b, c) E and G K 4, we have (c, b), (b, a) E. From (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 4 we have (c, a) E. Hence G K 9. So G K 3 K 9. Therefore

Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 569 K 4 K 3 K 9. Suppose that G K 3 K 9. For any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, b), (b, c) E. Since G K 3, we have (c, a) E. From (a, b), (b, c), (c, a) E and G K 9, we have (a, c) E. From (c, a), (a, b), (b, c) E and G K 9, we have (c, b) E. From (b, c), (c, a), (a, b) E and G K 9 we have (b, a) E. For any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, c), (c, b), (b, a) E. Since G K 9, we have (a, b) E. From (b, a), (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 9, we have (b, c) E. Then, we have G K 4. Hence K 3 K 9 K 4. Therefore K 3 K 9 = K 4. Theorem 3.13. K 3 K 10. Proof. Let G = (V, E) be a graph. Let G K 3 and for any a, b, c V, suppose that (a, c), (a, b), (b, c) E. From (a, b), (b, c) E and G K 3, we have (c, a) E. From (c, a), (a, c) E and G K 3, we have (c, c) E. From (b, c), (c, c) E and G K 3, we have (c, b) E. Suppose that (a, c), (a, b), (c, b) E. From (a, c), (c, b) E and G K 3, we have (b, a) E. From (b, a), (a, b) E and G K 3, we have (b, b) E. From (c, b), (b, b) E and G K 3, we have (b, c) E. Then G K 10. Therefore K 3 K 10. In the similar way, we have K 8 K 10 = K 13, K 5 K 10 = K 11, K 7 K 9 = K 12, K 1 K 7 = K 2, K 2 K 4 = K 6, K 12 K 2 = K 6, K 12 K 4 = K 6, K 1 K 9 = K 4, K 1 K 3 = K 4, K 9 K 13, K 5 K 8, K 1 K 11, K 2 K 1, K 11 K 13 and K 7 K 13. We found that the set K = {K 0, K 1, K 3,..., K 13 } close under inclusion. Hence K is the set of all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties. Since the intersection of any family of triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties is again a triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph variety, K forms a poset under inclusion, in which two elements have a greatest lower bound (their intersection) and least upper bound (the intersection of all triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties which contain both of them), Thus we have a lattice (K;, ), called the triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc lattice of graph varieties. The following is the Hasse diagram of this lattice.

570 M. Thongmoon and T. Poomsa-ard K 0 K 10 K 8 K 13 K 5 K 3 K 9 K 11 K 1 K 7 K 4 K 2 K12 K 6 Acknowledgment The authors are very grateful to the referee for his careful work and suggestions which improved the quality of the paper. We also would like to thank the Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University for their financial support. References [1] A. Ananpinitwatna and T. Poomsa-ard, Identities in biregular leftmost graph varieties of type (2,0), Asian-European J. of Math., 2(1), 2009, 1-18. [2] K. Denecke and S.L. Wismath, Universal Algebra and Applications in Theoretical Computer Science, ChapmanHall/CRC 2002. [3] M. Krapeedang and T. Poomsa-ard, Biregular leftmost graph varieties of graph algebras of type (2,0), will be appear. [4] J. Khampakdee and T. Poomsa-ard, Hyperidentities in (xy)x x(yy) graph algebras of type (2,0), Bull. Khorean Math. Soc. 44(2007), no. 4, 651-661. [5] E. W. Kiss, R. Pöschel and P. Pröhle, Subvarieties of varieties generated by graph algebras, Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 54(1990), no. 1-2. 57-75. [6] T. Poomsa-ard, Hyperidentities in associative graph algebras, Discuss. Math. Gen. Algebra Appl. 20(2000), no. 2, 169-182.

Triregular leftmost without loop and reverse arc graph varieties 571 [7] T. Poomsa-ard, J. Wetweerapong and C. Samartkoon Hyperidentities in idempotent graph algebras, Thai J. Math. 2(2004), no. 1, 173-182. [8] T. Poomsa-ard, J. Wetweerapong and C. Samartkoon Hyperidentities in transitive graph algebras, Discuss. Math. Gen. Algebra Appl. 25(2005), no. 1, 23-37. [9] R. Pöschel, The equational logic for graph algebras, Z. Math. Logik Grundlag. Math. 35(1989), no. 3, 273-282. [10] R. Pöschel, Graph algebras and graph varieties, Algebra Universalis, 27(1990), no. 4, 559-577. [11] R. Pöschel and W. Wessel, Classes of graphs definable by graph algebras identities or quasiidentities, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolonae 28(1987), 581-592. [12] C. R. Shallon, Nonfinitely based finite algebras derived from lattices, Ph. D. Dissertation, Uni. of California, Los Angeles, 1979. Received: August, 2009