MOSFET Models. The basic MOSFET model consist of: We will calculate dc current I D for different applied voltages.

Similar documents
MOSFET DC Models. In this set of notes we will. summarize MOSFET V th model discussed earlier. obtain BSIM MOSFET V th model

Thermionic Emission Theory

Metal-Semiconductor Interfaces. Metal-Semiconductor contact. Schottky Barrier/Diode. Ohmic Contacts MESFET. UMass Lowell Sanjeev Manohar

MOS electrostatic: Quantitative analysis

Long Channel MOS Transistors

Lecture 8. MOS (Metal Oxide Semiconductor) Structures

EE105 - Spring 2007 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. Structure and Symbol of MOSFET. MOS Capacitor. Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (MOS) Capacitor

MOSFET Capacitance Model

Semiconductor Physics and Devices

ECE606: Solid State Devices Lecture 22 MOScap Frequency Response MOSFET I-V Characteristics

Final Examination EE 130 December 16, 1997 Time allotted: 180 minutes

FIELD-EFFECT TRANSISTORS

MOS Transistors. Prof. Krishna Saraswat. Department of Electrical Engineering Stanford University Stanford, CA

ELEC 3908, Physical Electronics, Lecture 23. The MOSFET Square Law Model

MOS: Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor

55:041 Electronic Circuits

MOS Capacitor MOSFET Devices. MOSFET s. INEL Solid State Electronics. Manuel Toledo Quiñones. ECE Dept. UPRM.

MOSFET: Introduction

The Devices. Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. July 30, 2002

Long-channel MOSFET IV Corrections

MOSFETs - An Introduction

Section 12: Intro to Devices

MOS CAPACITOR AND MOSFET

ECE606: Solid State Devices Lecture 23 MOSFET I-V Characteristics MOSFET non-idealities

MOS Transistor I-V Characteristics and Parasitics

The Intrinsic Silicon

Semiconductor Physics Problems 2015

Section 12: Intro to Devices

Lecture 12 - Non-isolated DC-DC Buck Converter

EE105 - Fall 2006 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

MOS Transistor Theory MOSFET Symbols Current Characteristics of MOSFET. MOS Symbols and Characteristics. nmos Enhancement Transistor

MOS Transistor. EE141-Fall 2007 Digital Integrated Circuits. Review: What is a Transistor? Announcements. Class Material

EE105 - Fall 2005 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits

The Devices: MOS Transistors

Integrated Circuits & Systems

Metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (2 lectures)

CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits. Lecture 03: MOS Transistor

LECTURE 3 MOSFETS II. MOS SCALING What is Scaling?

EEC 118 Lecture #2: MOSFET Structure and Basic Operation. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation

EE 508 Lecture 16. Filter Transformations. Lowpass to Bandpass Lowpass to Highpass Lowpass to Band-reject

Lecture 12: MOS Capacitors, transistors. Context

The Gradual Channel Approximation for the MOSFET:

Introduction to Power Semiconductor Devices

Analytical Modeling and Simulation of SiGe MOS Gate HEMT

Lecture 7 PN Junction and MOS Electrostatics(IV) Metal Oxide Semiconductor Structure (contd.)

EE5311- Digital IC Design

FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS:

The Three terminal MOS structure. Semiconductor Devices: Operation and Modeling 115

EE 508 Lecture 16. Filter Transformations. Lowpass to Bandpass Lowpass to Highpass Lowpass to Band-reject

EE105 Fall 2014 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. NMOS Transistor Capacitances: Saturation Region

Course Administration. CPE/EE 427, CPE 527 VLSI Design I L04: MOS Transistors. Review: CMOS Process at a Glance

Current mechanisms Exam January 27, 2012

Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. The Devices. July 30, Devices.

Student Number: CARLETON UNIVERSITY SELECTED FINAL EXAMINATION QUESTIONS

Lecture 8 PN Junction and MOS Electrostatics (V) Electrostatics of Metal Oxide Semiconductor Structure (cont.) October 4, 2005

ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems. Today. Refinement. Last Time. No Field. Body Contact

Semiconductor Physics fall 2012 problems

Spring Semester 2012 Final Exam

ECE 340 Lecture 39 : MOS Capacitor II

Lecture 23 Date:

Lecture 5: CMOS Transistor Theory

Extensive reading materials on reserve, including

nmosfet Schematic Four structural masks: Field, Gate, Contact, Metal. Reverse doping polarities for pmosfet in N-well.

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Scaling Issues in Planar FET: Dual Gate FET and FinFETs

EE 560 MOS TRANSISTOR THEORY

The Devices. Devices

VLSI Design I; A. Milenkovic 1

Lecture 15 OUTLINE. MOSFET structure & operation (qualitative) Review of electrostatics The (N)MOS capacitor

Device Models (PN Diode, MOSFET )

ECE315 / ECE515 Lecture-2 Date:

The Devices. Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. July 30, 2002

ECE 342 Electronic Circuits. 3. MOS Transistors

Chapter 17 Amplifier Frequency Response

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. EECS 130 Professor Ali Javey Fall 2006

Device Models (PN Diode, MOSFET )

6.012 Electronic Devices and Circuits Spring 2005

Conduction in Semiconductors -Review

B.Supmonchai June 26, q Introduction of device basic equations. q Introduction of models for manual analysis.

Lecture 04 Review of MOSFET

The Devices. Jan M. Rabaey

ECE 305 Fall Final Exam (Exam 5) Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Charge Storage in the MOS Structure. The Inverted MOS Capacitor (V GB > V Tn )

Conduction Heat transfer: Unsteady state

MOSFET. Id-Vd curve. I DS Transfer curve V G. Lec. 8. Vd=1V. Saturation region. V Th

Schottky Rectifiers Zheng Yang (ERF 3017,

EECS130 Integrated Circuit Devices

EE105 - Fall 2006 Microelectronic Devices and Circuits. Some Administrative Issues

Lecture 15: MOS Transistor models: Body effects, SPICE models. Context. In the last lecture, we discussed the modes of operation of a MOS FET:

Proposal of the Thin Film Pirani Vacuum Sensor Still Sensitive Above 1 Atmosphere ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

EE 560 MOS TRANSISTOR THEORY PART 2. Kenneth R. Laker, University of Pennsylvania

MOS Transistor Theory

V = 4 3 πr3. d dt V = d ( 4 dv dt. = 4 3 π d dt r3 dv π 3r2 dv. dt = 4πr 2 dr

Electrical Characteristics of MOS Devices

Typical example of the FET: MEtal Semiconductor FET (MESFET)

Q.1. x A =0.8, ε A =δ A *y A = 0.8*5=4 (because feed contains 80 mol% A, y A = 0.8, δ A =((6-1)/1)=5) k= 0.3 hr -1. So, θ = hr Q.

MOS Transistor Theory

ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals

Fundamentals of the Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor

! CMOS Process Enhancements. ! Semiconductor Physics. " Band gaps. " Field Effects. ! MOS Physics. " Cut-off. " Depletion.

Transcription:

MOSFET Model The baic MOSFET model conit of: junction capacitance CBS and CB between ource (S) to body (B) and drain to B, repectively. overlap capacitance CGO and CGSO due to gate (G) to S and G to overlap, repectively. S to B and to B diode. We will calculate dc current for different applied voltage. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #1

MOSFET C Model Let u apply a large potential at the gate of an MOS capacitor to caue inverion, i.e. G > th. The conductance, 1/R of the inverion layer i: x n L G x P W g x 1 W q n ( x) dx n R L µ (1) 0 Where, n (x) e denity in the inverion layer x depth of the inverion layer µ n e mobility in the inverion layer 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #

nverion Layer Conductance The inverion layer mobility i, alo, called the urface mobility and i 1/ bulk mobility. Now, the inverion layer charge per unit area i given by: x Q q n ( x) dx 0 Auming µ n contant, we get from (1) and (): g W µ Q L n ( e ) (3) and the inverion layer reitance of an elemental length dy i: dy dr (4) W µ nq Eq. (4) for MOS capacitor can be directly ued to derive drain current for MOSFET under different biaing condition. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #3 ()

Level1 MOSFET Model Let u conider the the following MOSFET tructure. The gate bia G provide the control of urface carrier denitie. f G > th, inverion layer exit. a conducting channel exit S and current will flow. S G n+ n+ P th i determined by the propertie of the tructure and i given by the equation we derived for MOS capacitor. That i, Q f q N A K ε o(φ F) th φ MS + φ F + (5) Co Co For G < th, the tructure conit of two diode back to back and only leakage current flow ( o of PN junction); i.e., ~ 0. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #4

Characteritic + G + x y n+ n+ Q (y) Q B (y) P nverion layer epletion region Note: The depletion region i wider around the drain becaue of the applied drain voltage. The potential along the channel varie from at y L to 0 at y 0 between the drain and ource. The channel charge Q and the bulk charge Q B will in general be f(y) becaue of the influence of, i.e. potential varie along the channel length. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #5

Characteritic Uing (4), the voltage drop acro an elemental length dy of MOSFET channel i: d Now, at any point in ilicon the induced charge due to G i: Again, dr Wµ n dy Q (y) Q (y) Q (y) + Q B (y) (7) G FB Q /C OX + φ (8) Note that FB include φ MS and Q f. Combining (7) and (8), we get: Q (y) { G FB φ (y)}c OX Q B (y) (9) Since the urface i inverted, φ φ F plu any revere bia that exit between the channel and ubtrate (due to or Sub ). (6) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #6

Characteritic φ (y) (y) + φ F (10) Alo, we know from MOS capacitor analyi that Note: Q B ( y) qn qk ( y) ε N [ ( y) + φ A we move from S, (y) due to R drop in the channel. x d max a we move toward the drain Q B a we move toward the drain. A x d Subtituting (10) and (11) into (9), we have: max o A F ] (11) Q ( y) { + G FB qk ε ( y) φ o N A F } C [ ( y) + φ OX F ] (1) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #7

Characteritic Subtituting (1) in (6), we get: dy Wµ n( { G FB ( y) φ F } COX qk εon A[ ( y) + φ F ])d f we aume Q B (y) contant, i.e. neglect the influence of channel voltage on Q B, then we can write: dy Wµ Wµ n n C C OX OX qk ε on A[ ( y) + φ G FB ( y) φ F COX [ ( y) ]d G th n Eq. (13) th include the effect of φ F, φ MS, and Q B (y0). y 0 y L ntegrating within the limit: to 0 W µ ncox [ G th ] L ] d (13) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #8 F (14)

Characteritic: Linear Region Eq. (14) i ued in Level 1 MOSFET SPCE model to calculate. f we define: κ µ n C OX proce tranconductance β µ n C OX (W/L) κ(w/l) gain factor of the device β[ G th ] f < 0.1, we can implify (15) to: β ( G th ) (15) (16) Eq. (16) how that current varie linearly with. Thi region of MOSFET operation i called the linear region of operation. From (16), the effective reitance between the ource and drain i: R ch β ( ) G 1 th (17) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #9

Characteritic plot for different G from Eq. (15) how for higher. While the meaured aturate at higher. Thi dicrepancy i due to the breakdown of gradual channel approximation near the drain end of the channel at high. Eq. (15) i valid only a long a an inverion layer exit all the way from S. The maximum value of v. plot occur at G th SAT drain aturation voltage (18) For > SAT, a channel will not exit all the way to the drain. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #10

Characteritic: Saturation What happen for > SAT? e travelling in the inverion layer are injected into the depletion region. There the high εfield pull e into the drain. Further increae of do not change (to a firt order). contant for > SAT. The boundary between the linear and the aturation region i decribed by: G th SAT (18) n+ nverion layer end (pinch off) + G l n+ + > SAT G th 6 Linear Saturation Region Region 5 P pinch of epletion region length 4 3 1 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #11

Characteritic: Saturation Subtituting (18) in (16), we can how that the aturation drain current i given by: W ( ) SAT µ ncox G th (19) L quare law theory of MOSFET device. At > SAT, channel i pinchedoff and the effective channel length i given by: L eff L l d L(1 l d /L) W ( L l ) ( ) Typically, l d << L, then from (0): d SAT µ ncox G th (0) l d 1 L 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #1 l + d SAT 1 (1) L

Characteritic: Saturation Since l d f( ), we can write: l L d 1 + 1+ λ () Here, λ f( ) channel length modulation model parameter. SAT ( + λ ) 1 (3) From (3), 0 at 1/ λ. λ can be extracted from the intercept of v. plot at 0 a hown in Fig. G5 > G4 > G3 > G > G1 G5 G4 G3 G G1 1/λ 0 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #13

Level 1 MOSFET Model: Summary Current Eq: 0 G th (cutoff region) β[ G th ] β ( G th) ( 1+ λ). G th, SAT (linear region) G th, SAT (aturation region) (4) Model Parameter: TO threhold voltage at B 0 KP proce tranconductance GAMMA body factor LAMBA channel length modulation factor PH φ F bulk Fermipotential. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #14

Aumption: Level 1 MOSFET Model: Summary gradual channel approximation (GCA) i valid majority carrier current i negligibly (uch a hole current for nmosfet i neglected) recombination and generation are negligible current flow in the ydirection (along the length of the channel) only carrier mobility µ in the inverion layer i contant in the y direction current flow i due to drift only (no diffuion current) bulk charge Q B i contant at any point in the ydirection. The accuracy of Level 1 model i poor even for long device. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #15

4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #16 Level Model: BulkCharge Model n reality, Q B varie along the channel form ource at y 0 to drain at y L becaue of applied bia. Then from (11) with back bia B we have: Uing (6) in (6) and integrating form y 0 to y L we get: Eq (7) i the current ued by SPCE Level MOSFET model. ) ( ] ) ( [ ) ( ) ( max y C y N qk y x qn y Q B F OX B F A o d A B + + + + φ γ φ ε (5) ( ) ) ( ) ( ) ( y y C y Q B F F FB G OX + + φ γ φ (6) ( ) ( ) }] { 3 ) [( 3 3 B F B F F FB G OX n L C W + + + φ φ γ φ µ (7)

Level 1 v. Level Characteritic 6 4 Eqn. (14) G 5 Eqn. (7) G 4 6 8 We ee that for a typical device the approximate Eq. (14) work well at low but predict higher current at large. Thi i becaue ome of the gate charge upport Q B at higher which i ignored by (14). Both Eqn. (14) and (7) are valid only a long a an inverion layer exit all the way from S. The expreion for aturation drain voltage for Level model i given by: SAT γ γ G FB φ F + γ G FB + B + 4 (8) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #17

Level MOSFET Model Current Conideration of Q B variation along the channel offer more accurate modeling in the linear and aturation region. The current given by (7) i accurate, however, complex. i implified uing a new model parameter: 0.5 δ φ + f 0 β[ β α G α ] ( ) ( 1+ λ ). G F B α 1+ δγ, th then th (9) (30) G th (cutoff region) G th, SAT (linear region) G th, SAT (aturation region) (31) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #18

Subthrehold Region Model S th GS Simple long channel device equation aume: S 0 for GS < th. n reality, S 0 and varie exponentially with GS in a manner imilar to a bipolar tranitor. n order to develop a theory of ubthrehold conduction, let u conider MOS band diagram with applied ource (S) and gate (G) bia meaured with repect to the ubtrate (Sub), that i: S Sub G Sub. φ GSub GS Gate SiO psi φ SSub φ F φ F SSub E c E i E F E v 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #19

Subthrehold Region Model n the ubthrehold (weak inverion) region, we know the following: 1 A E F i pulled above E i, the number of minority carrier e at the urface increae exponentially with E F E i. When φ φ F, trong inverion (n urf p bulk ) i achieved and we obtain th. 3 For φ < φ F, the dominant charge preent near the urface are ionized acceptor atom, i.e. n urf << N A. Thu, there i no εfield laterally along the urface ince Poion equation i the ame everywhere. Thu, any current flow mut be due to diffuion only. φ 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #0 φ F E c E i E F E v

Subthrehold Region Model dn Aq (3) dx 4 The e gradient along the channel (dn/dx) mut be contant in order to maintain contant current. Aq[{n(0) n(l)}/l] n+ n+... (33) X Now, we can now ue carrier tatitic to calculate n(0) and n(l). Referring band diagram on page 0: n i q ( φ φ ) ( φ φ ) kt Where φ i the urface potential with repect to the ubtrate. Alo, note that φ contant along the channel [ε(x) 0]. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #1 P So few e that ε x 0 q SSub F kt ( 0) nie (34) n( L) n e Sub F N A (35)

Subthrehold Region Model Since the charge in the ubtrate i aumed uniform (N A ), then from Poion equation: d φ qn A de (36) dx ε dx φ varie parabolically and E varie linearly with ditance. Since the e concentration fall off a e qφ/kt away from the urface, eentially, all of the minority carrier e are contained in a region in which the potential drop by kt/q. The depth of the inverion layer, X inv φ/e. where φ kt/q, and E i the εfield at the urface. Again, from Gau Law: ε E Q ε qn φ (37) ε kt q kt B X inv (38) ε q qn qn Aφ Aφ ε 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha # A

Subthrehold Region Model Uing (34), (35), and (38) in (33), we get: q W q ni e L Here A WX inv. Uing Sub S + S Sub, ( φ φ ) q( φ φ ) SSub kt F e Sub kt F kt q ε qn φ A (39) ( φ φ ) q SSub F W ε kt ktni e 1 e L qnaφ q kt To make ue of thi equation, we need to know how φ varie with the externally applied potential G. qε N φ 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #3 S (40) A GSub FB + φ + (41) Co

Subthrehold Region Model Generally, it i more common to ue the ource potential a the reference o that: G Sub GS + SSub φ ψ + S Sub q( ψ φf ) W ε kt ktni e 1 e L qn Aφ qε N A ψ + GS FB + ψ + Co The depletion layer capacitance i: Therefore, from (43): d dψ GS 1 qε N A 1+ 1+ C o ( ψ + ) SSub ( ) C C SSub C o q kt n S qε ( ψ + ) N A SSub (4) (43) (44) (45) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #4

Subthrehold Region Model n order to eliminate ψ from (4), we expand GS in a erie about the point ψ 1.5φ F (weak inverion correpond to φ F ψ φ F ). Where * and i obtained from (43). GS GS ψ 1. 5φ F ( ψ 1. φ ) GS GS + n ψ φ 5 1.5 F (46) F Combining (46) with (4) to eliminate ψ in the exponential and uing (44) to eliminate the quare root of ψ in (4), we obtain: * q( GS GS ) qφ F qs W kt nkt kt kt µ Cni e 1 e (47) L q 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #5

Subthrehold Region Model Thu, the ubthrehold current i given by: * q( ) GS GS qφ F q S W kt nkt kt kt µ Cni e 1 e (47) L q From (47) we note that: depend on S only for mall S, i.e. S 3kT/q, ince exp[ q S /kt) 0 for larger S. depend exponentially on GS but with an ideality factor n > 1. Thu, the lope i poorer than a BJT but approache to that of a BJT in the limit n 1. N A and S Sub enter through C. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #6

S (A) 1.E04 1.E05 1.E06 1.E07 1.E08 1.E09 1.E10 1.E11 1.E1 Subthrehold Slope (Sfactor) n order to change by one decade, we get from (47): q nkt S GS 60 ln10 S m decade kt q 1 + C C 0.0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 GS () o ln10( n) th kt q ln10 1 + C C kt C Slope ln10 1 q + C m 60 ( n) decade 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #7 o (@ room T)... (48) o (@ room T)

Subthrehold Model Final Note n weak inverion or ubthrehold region, MOS device have exponential characteritic but are le efficient than BJT becaue n > 1. Subthrehold lope S doe not cale and i contant. Therefore, th can not be caled a required by the ideal caling law. S affect th a well a ubthrehold current. n order to optimize S, the deirable parameter are: thin oxide low N A high Sub. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #8

Level /3 MOSFET Model Current Uing ubthrehold region model, for G < on, we can how: on e q ( ) G on nkt (49) Here on G at the point of interection between the trong and weak inverion while on @ G on Thu, the complete longchannel C MOSFET model i given by: ( ) q G on exp nkt α β[ G th β G th α on ] ( ) ( 1+ λ ). G on (cutoff region) G th, SAT (linear region) G th, SAT (aturation region) (50) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #9

nverion Layer Mobility n our derivation of, we have conidered µ contant which i not true under applied G and. A the vertical field E x and lateral field E y increae with increaing G and repectively, carrier undergo increaed cattering. µ f(e x, E y ) For implicity of calculation an effective mobility defined a the average mobility of carrier i ued in MOSFET: µ eff X inv 0 µ ( x, X inv 0 y) n( x, y) dx n( x, y) dx (51) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #30

Mobility egradation due to G n reality, µ i ignificantly reduced by large vertical e field. The vertical efield, pull the inverion layer e toward the urface cauing more urface cattering and interaction of e with oxide charge (Q f, N it ) cauing coulomb cattering. Effective mobility v. effective normal efield how: at high field: univeral behavior independent of doping denity. at low field: dependence on 1) doping denity and ) interface charge. univeral behavior 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #31

Mobility egradation due to G Mobility veru effective normal electric field curve i modeled uing three component: coulomb cattering (due to ionized impurity) phonon cattering almot contant urface roughne cattering (at Si/SiO interface). At low normal field: le inverion charge denity ionized impurity cattering dominate and µ eff f(n A ). At high normal field: higher inverion charge denity cloe to the interface urface roughne cattering dominate. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #3

Mobility egradation due to G The mobility correction ha everal flavor depending on the level of MOSFET model. n SPCE MOSFET Level 3 and 4 ue a imple form uch a: µ eff 1+ θ µ ( ) Where the model parameter are: G th θ mobility degradation parameter due to G. µ 0 low field mobility. 0 (5) The effective mobility due to G i called lowfield urface mobility. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #33

Mobility egradation due to An additional complication arie becaue of the high lateral e field E(y). We aumed, v d µe. However, for e in ilicon v d aturate near E ~ 10 4 /cm. Average efield for hort channel device > 10 4 /cm. Therefore, mall geometry MOS device will operate with: v d v at 10 7 cm/ec. Since µ contant, we need to account for high lateral field effect in the expreion for derived from imple theory. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #34

Mobility egradation due to The velocity aturation of inverion carrier due to increaed lateral field caue: current aturation ooner than predicted by SAT G th lower SAT than the predicted value by imple theory. The drift velocity due to high field effect i given by: v µ [( ) β ] 1 E E β y 1+ y C E Where E C v at /µ critical lateral field for velocity aturation. For implicity of numerical olution, β 1 i ued for modeling. µ Ey v 1 + µ E v (53) y at 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #35

Modeling Mobility egradation The effective mobility due to combine effect of G and i given by: µ eff µ 0 1 + θ ( G th ) + θbb + θc (54) Where θ C 1/LE C L channel length of MOSFET. Thu, µ eff i modeled by the parameter et: {(µ 0, θ, θ b, and v at (E C )}. The model parameter are obtained by curve fitting the experimental data to the model equation. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #36

Modeling SAT at High efield Aume a piecewie linear model, i.e., v d aturate abruptly at E E c : v d µ eff E, E 1+ E v at, c ( E E ) ( E E ) c c (55) Where E lateral efield. E c critical efield at which carrier are velocity aturated, i.e. v v at. Now, the current at any point x in the channel i given by: (x) WC o [ G th (x)]v(x) (56) Where (x) potential difference between the drain and channel at x. v(x) carrier velocity at x. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #37 v v at µ o E c E

Modeling SAT at High efield Subtituting (55) in (56) we get: d( x) E( x) Wµ C [ x ] dx eff o G th ( ) E ntegrating (57) from x 0 to x L and (x) 0 to (x), we get in the linear region ( S SAT ): 1 Wµ effco G th S S (58) + S L 1 EcL Let u define, SAT the drain aturation voltage due to v at. i.e. at E E c. Uing thi condition in (57) we get in the aturation region ( S SAT ): W µ eff C o ( ) G th SAT E c c (57) (59) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #38

Modeling SAT at High efield given by (58) and (59) mut be continuou @ S SAT. Thu, Equating (58) and (59) we can olve for SAT : SAT EC L E L + C ( G th) ( ) G th G th G 1+ E L (60) From (60), if L i large, SAT ( G th ) ued in the imple theory. Eq (60) i ued to calculate drain current for > SAT in BSM3 and BSM4 MOSFET model. C th 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #39

HotCarrier Effect For S > SAT, lateral efield increae beyond E c and reache a maximum value at the drain end. From peudod analyi it can be hown that maximum efiled i: E (61) c S SAT E m + l p E E m Where, l p depend on: gate oxide thickne t ox E c S L X junction depth x j l 1. 73t x p (6) ox j f ( S SAT ) /l p >> E c, then: E m l S SAT (63) p 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #40

HotCarrier Effect Channel electron traveling through high electric field near the drain end can: n+ Source Gate g hot e hole ub n+ rain become highly energetic, i.e. hot caue impact ionization and generate e and hole hole go into the ubtrate creating ubtrate current, ub. Some channel e have enough energy to overcome the SiO Si energy barrier generating gate current, g. The maximum efield, E m near the drain ha the greatet control of hot carrier effect. 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #41

Subtrate Current Modeling mpact ionization coefficient, α A i exp( B i /E). Then the ubtrate current due to impact ionization i: ub αdx o l A e Where x o tart of impact ionization region with E E c. x l p length of impact ionization region with E E m. Changing the limit of integration to E in (19) and after integration we get: A i B i ub l pem exp (65) Bi Em A E m, ub. l p p o i B i E ( x) dx (64) 4March04 HO #18: ELEN 51 MOSFET Model Saha #4