Constraints on secular evolution in unbarred spiral galaxies: understanding bulge and disk formation

Similar documents
Evidence for bar-induced secular evolution in massive disk galaxies. Dimitri Gadotti ESO

Stellar Populations in the Galaxy

Distribution of Mass in the Milky Way Galaxy, Leiden, July Laura V. Sales. Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands

ASTRO 310: Galactic & Extragalactic Astronomy Prof. Jeff Kenney

CALAR ALTO LEGACY INTEGRAL FIELD AREA SURVEY OVERVIEW, STATUS & LATEST RESULTS

Galaxy classification

Secular Evolution of Galaxies

Chemo-dynamical disk modeling. Ivan Minchev Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)

Overview of Dynamical Modeling. Glenn van de Ven

Volume-limited limited sample

ASTRON 449: Stellar (Galactic) Dynamics. Fall 2014

THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY DISK

Galaxy kinematics with WEAVE high spectral resolution IFU data

Gaia Revue des Exigences préliminaires 1

Stellar Populations in the Local Group

Epicycles the short form.

Mariya Lyubenova, Glenn van de Ven

What can M2M do for Milky Way Models?

Stellar Dynamics and Structure of Galaxies

The Frac)on of Bars in the Local Universe

Zoccali et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 931. Overview of (old) Galactic components. bulge, thick disk, metal-weak halo. metallicity & age distribution

Stellar populations model predictions in the UV spectral range

An analogy. "Galaxies" can be compared to "cities" What would you like to know about cities? What would you need to be able to answer these questions?

Myung Gyoon Lee. With Ho Seong Hwang (CfA) and Hong Soo Park (NAOJ) (Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University)

The Gaia-ESO Spectroscopic Survey. Survey Co-PIs. Gerry Gilmore (IoA, Cambridge) & Sofia Randich (INAF/Arcetri) >300 CoIs

View of the Galaxy from within. Lecture 12: Galaxies. Comparison to an external disk galaxy. Where do we lie in our Galaxy?

Upcoming class schedule

Normal Galaxies ASTR 2120 Sarazin

Gaia ITNG2013 School, Tenerife. Ken Freeman, Lecture 2: the thin disk

The HERMES project. Reconstructing Galaxy Formation. Ken Freeman RSAA, ANU. The metallicity distribution in the Milky Way discs Bologna May 2012

Made-to-Measure (M2M) Dynamical modelling of external galaxies and the Milky Way

Galactic Bulge Science

University of Naples Federico II, Academic Year Istituzioni di Astrofisica, read by prof. Massimo Capaccioli. Lecture 16

Techniques for measuring astronomical distances generally come in two variates, absolute and relative.

Milky Way s Anisotropy Profile with LAMOST/SDSS and Gaia

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 11 Nov 2014

CALIFA galaxy dynamics across the Hubble sequence

BULGES NGC 4710 NGC 4594 ESO 498-G5 NGC 4565 NGC 7457 ESO 1129

Lecture 15: Galaxy morphology and environment

Lecture 2: Galaxy types, spectra

Lecture 2: Galaxy types, spectra. Galaxies AS

Gaia-LSST Synergy. A. Vallenari. INAF, Padova

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 7 Jun 2018

11 days exposure time. 10,000 galaxies. 3 arcminutes size (0.1 x diameter of moon) Estimated number of galaxies in observable universe: ~200 billion

Our Galaxy. Milky Way Galaxy = Sun + ~100 billion other stars + gas and dust. Held together by gravity! The Milky Way with the Naked Eye

The Accretion History of the Milky Way

THE GALACTIC BULGE AND ITS GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: MOS. B. Barbuy

ASTRO 310: Galac/c & Extragalac/c Astronomy Prof. Jeff Kenney. Class 4 Sept 10, 2018 The Milky Way Galaxy: Star Clusters

Spiral Structure. m ( Ω Ω gp ) = n κ. Closed orbits in non-inertial frames can explain the spiral pattern

Chapter 10: Unresolved Stellar Populations

Abundance distribution in the Galactic thick disk

The Milky Way Part 3 Stellar kinematics. Physics of Galaxies 2011 part 8

Stellar populations in the cd galaxy NGC 3311

Using Globular Clusters to. Study Elliptical Galaxies. The View Isn t Bad... Omega Centauri. Terry Bridges Australian Gemini Office M13

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 19 Sep 2006

Galactic dynamics reveals Galactic history

AS1001:Extra-Galactic Astronomy

The Milky Way Part 2 Stellar kinematics. Physics of Galaxies 2012 part 7

Stellar Dynamics and Structure of Galaxies

Gas and Stellar Dynamical Black Hole Mass Measurements:

Determination of [α/fe] and its Application to SEGUE F/G Stars. Young Sun Lee

Lecture Five: The Milky Way: Structure

Studying stars in M31 GCs using NIRI and GNIRS

Morphological Composition of z~0.4 Groups: The site of S0 Formation?

Galaxies. Hubble's measurement of distance to M31 Normal versus other galaxies Classification of galaxies Ellipticals Spirals Scaling relations

The motions of stars in the Galaxy

Other stellar types. Open and globular clusters: chemical compositions

Dynamical friction, galaxy merging, and radial-orbit instability in MOND

The Structure and Substructure of the Milky Way Galaxy Discs. Rosemary Wyse

IMF variations in unresolved stellar populations: Challenges

The star formation history of elliptical galaxies. Patricia Sanchez-Blazquez University of Central Lancashire, UK

Surface Brightness of Spiral Galaxies

An Introduction to Galaxies and Cosmology. Jun 29, 2005 Chap.2.1~2.3

SLACS Spectroscopy. Observations, Kinematics & Stellar Populations. Oliver Czoske Kapteyn Institute, Groningen, NL

Lecture 28: Spiral Galaxies Readings: Section 25-4, 25-5, and 26-3

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 28 Nov 2002

Major Review: A very dense article" Dawes Review 4: Spiral Structures in Disc Galaxies; C. Dobbs and J Baba arxiv "

Inner dynamics of massive galaxies (ETG) Michele Cappellari

FORMATION OF SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES Nestor M. Lasso Cabrera

Summary: Nuclear burning in stars

Spectroscopy of M81 Globular Clusters. Julie B. Nantais & John P. Huchra MMT Science Symposium 5/19/10

Building the cosmic distance scale: from Hipparcos to Gaia

THE QUEST RR LYRAE SURVEY AND HALO SUB-STRUCTURE

Exploring the stellar population of nearby and high redshift galaxies with ELTs. Marco Gullieuszik INAF - Padova Observatory

A M BLACK HOLE IN NGC 1277 FROM ADAPTIVE OPTICS SPECTROSCOPY. WALSH et al Akiyama Group M1 Genki Suzuki

Astronomy 330 Lecture 7 24 Sep 2010

Using globular clusters to test gravity in the weak acceleration regime

2 Galaxy morphology and classification

The separate formation of different galaxy components

Clicker Question: Galaxy Classification. What type of galaxy do we live in? The Variety of Galaxy Morphologies Another barred galaxy

1.4 Galaxy Light Distributions

IV. Interacting Galaxies

The Milky Way. Overview: Number of Stars Mass Shape Size Age Sun s location. First ideas about MW structure. Wide-angle photo of the Milky Way

Astronomy 1 Fall 2016

Hubble sequence galaxy classification scheme, originally based on appearance, but correlates with other properties as well.

Galaxies Astro 530 Fall 2015 Prof. Jeff Kenney. CLASS 4 September 14, 2015 Structure of Stellar Disks & IntroducJon to KinemaJcs

Exponential Profile Formation in Simple Models of Scattering Processes

Figure 69.01a. Formation of Stars

Rupali Chandar University of Toledo

Kinematical decomposition of stellar populations in disc galaxies

Transcription:

Constraints on secular evolution in unbarred spiral galaxies: understanding bulge and disk formation July 10 th 2012 Marja Kristin Seidel Jesús Falcón - Barroso Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias www.iac.es/project/traces

Constraints on secular evolution in unbarred spiral galaxies: understanding bulge and disk formation disentangling disk heating agents July 10 th 2012 Marja Kristin Seidel Jesús Falcón - Barroso Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias www.iac.es/project/traces

Introduction: Disk heating More than half of the stellar mass in the local Universe is found in disk galaxies (e.g. Driver et al. 2007) but we are far from understanding them. Especially: What is driving the heating of the disk? Investigate 3D-distribution of stellar velocity dispersions ellipsoid with axes ratios: σz/σr (and σϕ/σr) σr σz Possible disk heating agents: encounters with giant molecular clouds (GMCs) scattering by dark halo objects or globular clusters perturbation by spiral structure perturbation by stellar bars dissolution of young stellar clusters disturbances by satellite galaxies or minor mergers (e.g. from Spitzer & hwarzschild, 1951 to ha et al. 2010)

Introduction: Disk heating Model predictions encounters with GMCs (Sellwood, 2008): 3D agent perturbation by spiral structure (Jenkins & Binney, 1990): σr Age radial migration (e.g. Roskar et al. 2008): σr increases with age Metallicity for an existing metallicity gradient (e.g. Sánchez-Blázquez, 2009)* : σz/σr increase with metallicity But: in the solar neighborhood little evidence for the age-metallicity-relation (e.g. Feltzing et al., 2001) *still present even with satellites!

Introduction: Our study Our study focuses on: 6 disk galaxies across the Hubble sequence obtaining the ages and metallicities in different regions of the galaxies via full-spectrum fitting techniques relating these stellar population parameters with earlier kinematic results, i.e. σz/σr and the individual values (Shapiro & Gerssen 2003 and 2012)

mple Disk-heating (Shapiro & Gerssen 2003 and 2012) credit: HST/WFPC2 image spectra with resolutions of ~ 30 km s -1 and ~ 23 km s -1 NTT KPNO NGC 2280 (d) NGC 3810 () NGC 4030 () NGC 1068 () NGC 2775 (/b) NGC 2460 () different regions from radial surface brightness profiles and disk scale lengths: center bulge [trans] disk Note: all our galaxies show central sigma drops!

Methods ppxf (Cappellari & Emsellem, 2004) ; Gandalf (rzi et al. 2006) STARLIGHT (Cid Fernandes, 2007) mseidel@iac.es NGC 3810 () DISK Starlight + Miles models (Sánchez-Blazquez et al.2006) V= 1062.6,!= 2.0 km/s 1.2 ppxf Gandalf +ELODIE (Prugniel et al. 2007) Intensity [arb.units] 0 500 1000 1500 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 λ [Å] 0 500 1000 1500 For all three regions in major and minor axes: 0.2 0 mass & luminosity weighted Analyze the stellar populations! ages metallicities -0.2 4800 5000 5200 5400

How can stellar populations help us to understand secular evolution in spirals? disk heating processes?

Preliminary results: Ages and [Fe/H] Luminosity weighted Mass weighted age [Gyr] [Fe / H] repr. error b d center bulge disk center bulge Young populations dominate the luminosity weighted age (e.g. Serra & Trager, 2006) We mostly confirm inside-out growth scenario (e.g. Muños-Mateos, 2007) In our sample: late types show stronger [Fe/H] gradients than the early types (adding to MacArthur et al., 2009) disk

Preliminary results: Ages and [Fe/H] Luminosity weighted Mass weighted age [Gyr] [Fe / H] repr. error b d center bulge disk center bulge Young populations dominate the luminosity weighted age (e.g. Serra & Trager, 2006) We mostly confirm inside-out growth scenario (e.g. Muños-Mateos, 2007) In our sample: late types show stronger [Fe/H] gradients than the early types (adding to MacArthur et al., 2009) disk

Preliminary results: Disk heating With our stellar population results: is it possible to relate these two findings? Z B-V age [Gyr] Gerssen & Shapiro, 2012 Vazdekis et al., 2010

Preliminary results: σz/σr So far, only tentative correlations for both, [Fe/H] being stronger. 1.4 σz/σr [ km s -1 ] 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 H0 = 80% H0 = 20% b d 0.4 0.2 b d 0.0 0 5 10 15 age [Gyr] 1.2-1.0-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-0.0 0.2 [Fe/H]

Preliminary results: σr Best correlation obtained for σr with age: 250 200 H0 = 30% b d σr [ km s -1 ]! R 150 100 b d 50 0 5 10 15 20 age [Gyr] Consistent with simulated predictions (Roskar et al. 2008a, 2008b): if radial migration of stars is present, one expects an increase of σr with age

Discussion: σr Best correlation obtained for σr with age: 250 200 H0 = 30% b d σr [ km s -1 ]! R 150 100 50 0 5 10 15 20 age [Gyr] b d Consistent with simulated predictions (Roskar et al. 2008a, 2008b): if radial migration of stars is present, one expects an increase of σr with age

Discussion: Spiral structure - σr Transcient spiral arms (Sellwood&Binney, 2002), no increase in σz, but increase in σr Comparison with arm-class (Gerssen & Shapiro, 2012): best for σr 250 200 H0 = 30% b d σr [ km s -1 ]! R 150 100 b d BUT: trend for σz with both age, metallicity and arm-class found however, not as strong as for σr. 50 0 5 10 15 20 age [Gyr]

Discussion: GMCs - σz GMCs (Sellwood, 2008), increase in σz and σr Comparison with H2 gas surface density (Young et al., 1995):σz 250 200 H0 = 44% b d σz [ km s -1 ] 150 100 50 b d Surprisingly not a very good correlation with σz 0 0 5 10 15 20 age [Gyr]

Discussion: GMCs - σr GMCs (Sellwood, 2008), increase in σz and σr Comparison with H2 gas surface density (Young et al., 1995): best for σr 250 200 H0 = 30% b d σr [ km s -1 ]! R 150 100 b d Correlation with σr better! Adding to spiral structure? 50 0 5 10 15 20 age [Gyr]

Summary and Outlook Potential relation between disk heating agents and stellar ages and Z. Strongest suspect: spiral structure in addition with GMCs: 1) best correlation for [Fe/H] with σz/σr 2) good correlation for age with σr However, it will be interesting to check: truly radial dependencies within the disk to even better compare with model predictions separate distinct populations in our SFHs to better understand the interplay of bulge, disk and individual components obtain a larger sample of galaxies in order to increase our statistics and the reliability of our results

Thank you for listening any questions? - apart from this one...! talk on: www.iac.es/project/traces

Backup MORE SLIDES TO ILLUSTRATE IF WANTED

Backup (Jenkins & Binney, 1990)

Discussion: Disk heating Comparison with Roskar et al. 2008 and Sánchez-Blázquez et al. 2009: Consistent with both simulations, but: which can be the disk heating agent? [Z/H] Age [Gyr] R [kpc]

Vertical vel. disp. vs. Metallicity [ km s -1 ] 250 200 150 b d! z 100 50 b d 0-1.5-1.0-0.5 0.0 0.5 [Fe/H]

Ages and metallicities via line strengths sigma drop region bulge disk AGE Z

The idea Unravelling the nature of bars & bulges: observing secular evolution in action Use integral-field spectroscopic observations to study kinematics and stellar populations in two dimensions of (mainly) barred galaxies Reveal the mass distribution and star formation history of the chosen galaxies Link the 2D stellar dynamics and stellar populations to constrain scenarios for the secular evolution of galaxies under the influence of bars

Observations performed 2 successful observation proposals and observation at the WHT Data obtained and preliminarily reduced after the run: March 2012 for 3 out of 5 galaxies observed, binned to S/N = 40; SAURON mosaic on top of the photometric image from SDSS

Outlook Unravelling evolution processes by comparing with simulations From simulations: bars evolve and become stronger with time leaving an imprint in the LOSVD Growth as a consequence of angular momentum transfer between the different components of the galaxy: disk, bar, dark matter halo. Different stages in the time evolution of an early-type barred galaxy in one of our numerical simulations (Martinez-Valpuesta et al. 2006) :

Control sample and disk heating focus Disk-heating (Shapiro & Gerssen 2003 and 2012) NTT KPNO NGC 2280 (d) NGC 3810 () NGC 4030 () NGC 1068 () NGC 2775 (/b) NGC 2460 () ppxf (Cappellari & Emsellem, 2004) Gandalf (rzi et al. 2006) Mean ages and Z derived with Starlight (Roberto Cid Fernandes, 2007) age [Gyr] Z

Outline Introduction mple Methods Preliminary Results and Discussion Outlook