Regional Performance Measures

Similar documents
Regional Performance Measures

Geospatial Analysis of Job-Housing Mismatch Using ArcGIS and Python

California Urban Infill Trip Generation Study. Jim Daisa, P.E.

APPENDIX C-3 Equitable Target Areas (ETA) Technical Analysis Methodology

2040 MTP and CTP Socioeconomic Data

BROOKINGS May

ADDRESSING TITLE VI AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE IN LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANS

MPOs SB 375 LAFCOs SCAG Practices/Experiences And Future Collaborations with LAFCOs

East Bay BRT. Planning for Bus Rapid Transit

Advancing Urban Models in the 21 st Century. Jeff Tayman Lecturer, Dept. of Economics University of California, San Diego

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Southern California Using ACS PUMS, CTPP and LODES

Spatial and Socioeconomic Analysis of Commuting Patterns in Southern California Using LODES, CTPP, and ACS PUMS

Regional Growth Strategy Work Session Growth Management Policy Board

HORIZON 2030: Land Use & Transportation November 2005

Analyzing the Market Share of Commuter Rail Stations using LEHD Data

URBAN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ASSIGNMENT)

StanCOG Transportation Model Program. General Summary

Environmental Justice Analysis

APPENDIX C. Air Quality Data

Paul Waddell Professor, City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Director, Urban Analy;cs Lab President, UrbanSim Inc.

Figure 8.2a Variation of suburban character, transit access and pedestrian accessibility by TAZ label in the study area

GIS Analysis of Crenshaw/LAX Line

Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation

2014 Certification Review Regional Data & Modeling

Metrolinx Transit Accessibility/Connectivity Toolkit

The 3V Approach. Transforming the Urban Space through Transit Oriented Development. Gerald Ollivier Transport Cluster Leader World Bank Hub Singapore

Westside Extension Los Angeles, California

CTR Employer Survey Report

Uses of Travel Demand Models Beyond the MTP. Janie Temple Transportation Planning and Programming Division

Environmental Justice Analysis FOR THE MINNESOTA STATEWIDE FREIGHT SYSTEM PLAN

Encapsulating Urban Traffic Rhythms into Road Networks

Speakers: Jeff Price, Federal Transit Administration Linda Young, Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Center for Neighborhood Technology

Can Public Transport Infrastructure Relieve Spatial Mismatch?

The effects of impact fees on urban form and congestion in Florida

Regional Growth Strategy Regional TOD Advisory Committee

FHWA Peer Exchange Meeting on Transportation Systems Management during Inclement Weather

Taming the Modeling Monster

Developing the Transit Demand Index (TDI) Gregory Newmark, Regional Transportation Authority Transport Chicago Presentation July 25, 2012

Forecasts for the Reston/Dulles Rail Corridor and Route 28 Corridor 2010 to 2050

Financing Urban Transport. UNESCAP-SUTI Event

Frequently Asked Questions

The Role of Transitways in Our Region s Economic Competitiveness. The 23rd CTS Annual Research Conference St. Paul, MN May 23, 2012

Developing Built Environment Indicators for Urban Oregon. Dan Rubado, MPH EPHT Epidemiologist Oregon Public Health Division

Mapping Accessibility Over Time

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report OKALOOSA-WALTON OUTLOOK 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

How GIS based Visualizations Support Land Use and Transportation Modeling

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Commuting Patterns: Using ArcGIS and Big Data

TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL. Chapter 6

Overview of Improved Data and Tools for Integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning in California Caltrans Planning Horizons program November 7, 2012

Appendixx C Travel Demand Model Development and Forecasting Lubbock Outer Route Study June 2014

INSIDE. Metric Descriptions by Topic Area. Data Sources and Methodology by Topic Area. Technical Appendix

Local Economic Activity Around Rapid Transit Stations

Leveraging Urban Mobility Strategies to Improve Accessibility and Productivity of Cities

Regional Snapshot Series: Transportation and Transit. Commuting and Places of Work in the Fraser Valley Regional District

CERTIFIED RESOLUTION. introduction: and dated May 29, 2017, as attached, as appropriate

SBCAG Travel Model Upgrade Project 3rd Model TAC Meeting. Jim Lam, Stewart Berry, Srini Sundaram, Caliper Corporation December.

FHWA Planning Data Resources: Census Data Planning Products (CTPP) HEPGIS Interactive Mapping Portal

Guidelines on Using California Land Use/Transportation Planning Tools

Typical information required from the data collection can be grouped into four categories, enumerated as below.

Assessment of Models to Estimate Bus-Stop Level Transit Ridership using Spatial Modeling Methods

Service Area Analysis of Portland's METRO Bus System. Andy Smith-Petersen, University of Southern Maine -

Advancing Transportation Performance Management and Metrics with Census Data

Policy Note 6. Measuring Unemployment by Location and Transport: StepSA s Access Envelope Technologies

Transit Time Shed Analyzing Accessibility to Employment and Services

THE FUTURE OF FORECASTING AT METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. CTS Research Conference May 23, 2012

Spatial Variation in Local Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes

Keywords: Air Quality, Environmental Justice, Vehicle Emissions, Public Health, Monitoring Network

Expanding the GSATS Model Area into

MOR CO Analysis of future residential and mobility costs for private households in Munich Region

Land Use Modeling at ABAG. Mike Reilly October 3, 2011

A Comprehensive Method for Identifying Optimal Areas for Supermarket Development. TRF Policy Solutions April 28, 2011

Transit Service Gap Technical Documentation

The Journal of Database Marketing, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1999, pp Retail Trade Area Analysis: Concepts and New Approaches

Data Collection. Lecture Notes in Transportation Systems Engineering. Prof. Tom V. Mathew. 1 Overview 1

A/Prof. Mark Zuidgeest ACCESSIBILITY EFFECTS OF RELOCATION AND HOUSING PROJECT FOR THE URBAN POOR IN AHMEDABAD, INDIA

STAR COMMUNITY RATING SYSTEM OBJECTIVE EE-4: EQUITABLE SERVICES & ACCESS COMMUNITY LEVEL OUTCOMES FOR KING COUNTY, WA

Employment Capacity in Transit Station Areas in Maryland

Case Study: Orange County, California. Overview. Context

CRP 608 Winter 10 Class presentation February 04, Senior Research Associate Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity

Presentation of Travel Demand. And. Relationships to Land Use. Prepared for The Delaware Transportation Institute. David P. Racca

Simplified Trips-on-Project Software (STOPS): Strategies for Successful Application

Coordinated Transit and Land Use Planning in the Region of Waterloo

TRANSIT FORECASTING UNCERTAINTY & ACCURACY DAVID SCHMITT, AICP WITH VERY SPECIAL THANKS TO HONGBO CHI

ACCESSIBILITY OF INTERMODAL CENTERS STUDY

March 31, diversity. density. 4 D Model Development. submitted to: design. submitted by: destination

Urban Planning Word Search Level 1

Brian J. Morton Center for Urban and Regional Studies University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill June 8, 2010

INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS

Simulating Mobility in Cities: A System Dynamics Approach to Explore Feedback Structures in Transportation Modelling

Environmental Justice Areas with 2040 Roads

A Micro-Analysis of Accessibility and Travel Behavior of a Small Sized Indian City: A Case Study of Agartala

Subject: Note on spatial issues in Urban South Africa From: Alain Bertaud Date: Oct 7, A. Spatial issues

April 18, Accessibility and Smart Scale: Using Access Scores to Prioritize Projects

Identifying transit deserts in major Texas cities where the supplies missed the demands

Managing Growth: Integrating Land Use & Transportation Planning

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

City of Hermosa Beach Beach Access and Parking Study. Submitted by. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA

WOODRUFF ROAD CORRIDOR ORIGIN-DESTINATION ANALYSIS

Impact of Metropolitan-level Built Environment on Travel Behavior

Prepared for: San Diego Association Of Governments 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, California 92101

Transcription:

G Performance Measures

Regional Performance Measures Introduction This appendix highlights the performance of the MTP/SCS for 2035. The performance of the Revenue Constrained network also is compared to other network scenarios, such as 2010 Existing and 2035 No Build. The performance of the 2035 Revenue Constrained Network compared to existing conditions (2010), 2035, and the 2035 No Build is shown in Table G-1. In addition, this appendix includes the methodology to estimate the performance measures. Table G-1: Performance Measure Results Regional Performance Measures 2010 Existing 2020 No Build 2020 MTP/SCS 2035 No Build 2035 MTP/SCS Access and Mobility Work Trips Within 30 Minutes (percent) Drive Alone 84.3% 83.7% 83.8% 84.0% 84.2% Carpool 84.3% 83.7% 83.8% 84.0% 84.2% Transit 15.4% 15.5% 15.6% 16.9% 17.1% Commute Travel Time (minutes) 15.7 15.9 15.9 15.7 15.7 Economic Vitality Jobs Near High Quality Transit (percent) 17.5% 17.9% 29.0% 27.2% 57.3% Daily Truck Delay (hours) 2,802 4,487 4,038 11,471 10,667 Environment GHG Reductions (Percent reduction from 2005 baseline)* N/A 0.0% -3.5% 0.6% -5.9% Open Space Consumed (acres) N/A N/A N/A 2,944 2,556 Farmland Converted (acres) N/A N/A N/A 14,611 14,316 Healthy Communities Alternative Transportation Trips (percent) 17.3% 17.4% 17.1% 18.1% 17.7% Air Pollution - all vehicles (tons/day) 31.3 14.1 13.8 9.5 9.4 Peak Period Congested Vehicle Miles of Travel (miles) 128,463 275,639 221,103 749,430 618,975 Social Equity Distribution of MTP/SCS Investments (percent) Low income population N/A N/A 97.8% N/A 90.3% Non low income population N/A N/A 2.2% N/A 9.7% Minority population N/A N/A 91.8% N/A 79.1% Non minority population N/A N/A 8.2% N/A 20.9% Poverty population N/A N/A 78.9% N/A 62.2% Non poverty population N/A N/A 21.1% N/A 37.8% Access to Transit within 1/2 mile (percent) Low income population 14.5% 14.5% 23.5% 16.4% 48.2% Non low income population 10.3% 10.4% 18.1% 12.8% 38.4% Minority population 12.8% 12.8% 21.8% 14.9% 47.1% Non minority population 14.5% 14.7% 24.8% 17.0% 44.3% Poverty population 16.0% 15.9% 24.8% 13.6% 50.5% Non poverty population 11.9% 12.0% 20.4% 14.3% 42.6% System Preservation and Safety Maintain the Transportation System (percent) N/A N/A 58% N/A 50% Fatalities and Injuries per Capita 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% Moving Forward Monterey Bay 2035 G-2

Methodology to Estimate Performance Measures The methodology used to calculate the regional performance measures is detailed below. A variety of tools such as the Regional Travel Demand Model (RTDM), geographic information system (GIS), and EMFAC were used to estimate the performance measures. Percent of Work Trips That Are 30 Minutes of Less By Mode This performance measure is calculated by using the Regional Travel Demand Model. It is the work trips that are 30 minutes or less and divided by total work trips by mode: drive alone, carpool, and transit. Average Work Trip Travel Time This performance measure is calculated by using outputs from the Regional Travel Demand Model. It is the work trip person-hours of travel divided by total work trips (peak period). Percent of Jobs Within ½ Mile of a High Quality Transit Stop GIS. It is the jobs within a ½ mile of all high quality transit stops divided by the total jobs in the region. Jobs are calculated by using employment data at the traffic analysis zone (TAZ) spatial level. Spatially referenced employment data for the year 2010 was provided by InfoUSA and aggregated to the respective TAZs. The percentage of employees within a ½ mile of a high quality transit stop (HQTS) was estimated as an equivalent proportion of TAZ area within a ½ mile of an HQTS. In other words, the percent area of an individual TAZ within a ½ of an HQTS was applied to the total number of employees within that TAZ. Those employees were then summed with all the rest of employees near an HQTS within the AMBAG region. This method assumes that employees are equally distributed throughout the TAZ. However, given that individual TAZs within urbanized areas (and therefore HQTS) are not spatially broad, the possibility of underestimating employment numbers near HQTS is low. Daily Truck Hours of Delay This performance measure is calculated by multiplying the daily total vehicle hour delay by total number of trucks as reported by the Regional Travel Demand Model. GHG Emissions This performance measure reports the CO2 emissions for SB 375 vehicle types per capita based on outputs from the Regional Travel Demand Model and the California Air Resources Board s Emissions Factor (EMFAC) model. It is the daily pounds of CO2 divided by total population as a percent reduction from the 2005 baseline. Impacts to Sensitive Habitat Areas & Open Space This performance measure shows the total acreage of open space consumed by development. In that regard it considers impacts to sensitive habitat only as it pertains to destruction of that habitat for development. The performance measures do not include a separate analysis for sensitive habitat, however a detailed discussion of the impacts to sensitive habitat can be found in the Environmental Impact Report. Calculation of the acreage of sensitive habitat and open space consumed by each scenario was performed at the parcel level using GIS by examining the changes between existing and alternative land use types for each scenario. To estimate the amount of open space consumed under any given scenario, the sum was derived of all parcel areas which changed from open space (undeveloped land) to developed land. Farmland Preservation Calculation of the acreage of agricultural land consumed by each scenario was performed using GIS at the parcel level by examining the changes between existing and alternative land use types for each scenario. To estimate the amount of farmland consumed under any given scenario, the sum was derived of all parcel areas which changed from farmland to developed land. Alternative Transportation Trips This performance measure is an output from the Moving Forward Monterey Bay 2035 G-3

Regional Travel Demand Model. It is the total number of bike, walk, and transit trips. Smog Forming Pollutants (Daily Tons) vehicle miles traveled by speed as reported by the regional travel demand model. That output becomes an input in the California Air Resources Board s Emissions Factor (EMFAC) model. The output of EMFAC provides pollution in various categories. This performance measure is the daily short tons of reactive organic gases plus daily short tons of nitrogen oxides as reported from EMFAC. Congested Vehicle Miles of Travel This performance measure uses the Regional Travel Demand Model. It is the total vehicle miles traveled at level of service F (volume/capacity 1.0) divided by total vehicle miles traveled in the peak periods. Distribution of MTP/SCS Investments This performance measure is calculated using GIS. It is the dollar value of MTP expenditures serving low income and minority communities divided by total MTP expenditures. Note: this indicator provides a snapshot of MTP expenditures by geographic area. Other factors such as proximity to impacts of transportation projects and services are not reflected in this indicator. Defining Low Income and Minority The definition of minority individual was considered any non-white or mixed race person according to the 2010 Census data. Conversely, a non-minority individual was considered any white or non- Hispanic person. For the purposes of this analysis, a tract was considered to be predominantly minority if greater than 65% of the total population was nonwhite. The definition of low-income was considered a family whose annual income was less than $75,000 per year. This definition was developed by adjusting the national poverty level to a family of three living within the AMBAG region, as follows. The poverty level was adjusted based on housing prices within the AMBAG region relative to the national average home price. On average, the price of a home within the Monterey Bay Area is three times the national average price of a home. Therefore, the poverty level was adjusted by a multiplier of approximately three, as a general proxy for the higher cost-ofliving. This threshold was subsequently multiplied by a factor of 1.5 to capture poverty as well as low income earning families (this multiplier is suggested in the DOT Circular FTA C 4703.1, pg17, note 2). Tract-level income census data for individuals is provided in bins of $10,000 - $15,000 increment income ranges. Therefore, low-income families were counted as those earning between $0 and $74,999 per year. For the purpose of this analysis, a tract was considered predominantly low-income if greater than 65% of residing families earned less than $75,000 annually. Poverty was considered those families with a combined income of less than $25,000 per year. The limit of $25,000 was derived based on the US Federal Poverty Thresholds for 2013 for a family of 3-4 individuals. This level was estimated at approximately $20,000 per family. Due to the method of binning family income levels by the US Census Bureau, AMBAG s definition of poverty for this analysis was adjusted to $25,000. For the purpose of this analysis a tract was considered predominantly impoverished if greater than 20% of residing families earned less than $25,000 annually. Percent of Population Within ½ Mile of a High Quality Stop GIS. Existing and proposed high quality transit stops (HQTS) were located based on information provided by RTPAs. The definition of an HQTS includes any mass transit stop that is serviced at intervals of 15 minutes or less during peak hours as well as rail stations. Existing HQTS include but are not limited to the JAZZ Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line provided by Monterey-Salinas Transit; several BRT lines operated by Santa Cruz Metro; as well as major transit centers located in Marina, Salinas, Hollister, and Scotts Valley. Proposed HQTS were added to the existing data to represent future build-out of region transit projects. Proposed Moving Forward Monterey Bay 2035 G-4

HQTS include but are not limited to a new BRT corridor between Marina and Salinas; a new BRT line in Hollister; and bolstering existing BRT lines in Monterey and Santa Cruz. Although they are not technically considered high quality transit corridors by the standard definition due to less frequent headways, the proposed branch line rail stations are considered major stops per Senate Bill 375 and therefore are also considered for this analysis. and higher) multiplied by accident and fatality rates. Data for accidents and fatalities obtained from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the most recent years available, 2009 and 2010. The percentage of the regionwide population of each sub-group who reside within a ½ mile of a current or proposed HQTS was calculated using available demographic data from American Community Survey. Income and minority data were available at the census tract spatial resolution. Race populations were quantified by the number of minority/non-minority individuals residing within a tract. Income information was quantified by the number of families (any two or more people living together related by marriage, birth, or adoption) with a combined income below predefined thresholds residing within a tract. Since census tracts can span broad spatial distances relative to a ½ mile buffer, a method was needed to parse the sub-populations within large tracts. The percentage of families and individuals residing within a ½ radius of HQTS was estimated using the ratio of residential parcels within the buffered ½ mile to total number of residential parcels within each respective census tract. This method was found to be adequate for estimating the percentage of people within a ½ mile radius of an HQTS given the lack of detailed and consistent parcel level data available for the region. (GIS) Percent of Transportation Investments Towards Maintenance and Rehabilitation This performance measure was calculated by taking the sum of maintenance and rehabilitation transportation investments divided by all transportation investments. Annual Projected Accidents This performance measure uses data from the Regional Travel Demand Model. It is the projected vehicle miles traveled by functional class (collectors Moving Forward Monterey Bay 2035 G-5