X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2

Similar documents
X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

Electron Spectroscopy

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

Photoelectron Peak Intensities in Solids

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

Lecture 12 Multiplet splitting

Lecture 17 Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Lecture 10. Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections

Name: (a) What core levels are responsible for the three photoelectron peaks in Fig. 1?

5) Surface photoelectron spectroscopy. For MChem, Spring, Dr. Qiao Chen (room 3R506) University of Sussex.

Birck Nanotechnology Center XPS: X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy ESCA: Electron Spectrometer for Chemical Analysis

Advanced Lab Course. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 BASICS 1 3 EXPERIMENT Qualitative analysis Chemical Shifts 7

Lecture 5. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS)

Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS)

Photon Interaction. Spectroscopy

Lecture 20 Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Electron Spettroscopies

Lecture 10. Transition probabilities and photoelectric cross sections

8.6 Relaxation Processes

5.8 Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

X-ray Energy Spectroscopy (XES).

Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Xiaozhe Zhang 10/03/2014

Methods of surface analysis

Auger Electron Spectrometry. EMSE-515 F. Ernst

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Prof. Paul K. Chu

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

A Beginners Guide to XPS

Probing Matter: Diffraction, Spectroscopy and Photoemission

Core Level Spectroscopies

ATOMIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRONS, AND PERIODICITY

Electron spectroscopy Lecture Kai M. Siegbahn ( ) Nobel Price 1981 High resolution Electron Spectroscopy

Energy Spectroscopy. Ex.: Fe/MgO

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

4. Inelastic Scattering

An introduction to X- ray photoelectron spectroscopy

ATOMIC STRUCTURE, ELECTRONS, AND PERIODICITY

Energy Spectroscopy. Excitation by means of a probe

Electronic structure of correlated electron systems. Lecture 2

X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy (XPS - Ma4)

MT Electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy and electron probe microanalysis

Appearance Potential Spectroscopy

Chemical Analysis in TEM: XEDS, EELS and EFTEM. HRTEM PhD course Lecture 5

Bonds in molecules are formed by the interactions between electrons.

7. Electron spectroscopies

Depth Distribution Functions of Secondary Electron Production and Emission

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Theory and Practice

Ma5: Auger- and Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 2: UPS

Vacuum Science and Technology in Accelerators

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY PROBLEMS:

An Introduction to Diffraction and Scattering. School of Chemistry The University of Sydney

Inelastic soft x-ray scattering, fluorescence and elastic radiation

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Comparison of Sensitivities

Photoemission Spectroscopy

Electron and electromagnetic radiation

XPS o ESCA UPS. Photoemission Spectroscopies. Threshold Spectroscopies (NEXAFS, APS etc ) The physics of photoemission.

ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY OF SURFACES

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Introduction of XPS Absolute binding energies of core states Applications to silicene

Low Energy Electrons and Surface Chemistry

X-Ray transitions to low lying empty states

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy - An introduction

Surface Sensitive Techniques

Atomic Structure and Processes

An Introduction to XAFS

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Spectroscopy of Nanostructures. Angle-resolved Photoemission (ARPES, UPS)

The Electronic Structure of Atoms

4. How can fragmentation be useful in identifying compounds? Permits identification of branching not observed in soft ionization.

PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY (PES)

An Introduction to Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Optical and Photonic Glasses. Lecture 31. Rare Earth Doped Glasses I. Professor Rui Almeida

Matter-Radiation Interaction

Periodic Relationships

ICTP School on Synchrotron Radiation and Applications 2008 Surface Science, Photoemission and Related Techniques Fadley, Goldoni

Photoemission Spectroscopy: Fundamental Aspects

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Lecture 7 Chemical/Electronic Structure of Glass

Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Post Print. Energy dependence of Cu L 2,3 satellites using synchrotron excited x-ray-emission spectroscopy

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Generation of X-Rays in the SEM specimen

He, Ne, and Ar have shells.

Introduction of XPS Absolute binding energies of core states Applications to silicone Outlook

Elastic and Inelastic Scattering in Electron Diffraction and Imaging

Fundamentals of Nanoscale Film Analysis

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

Chemistry (

Auger Electron Spectroscopy *

Atomic Structure. Chapter 8

EE 527 MICROFABRICATION. Lecture 5 Tai-Chang Chen University of Washington

Chapter 9: Multi- Electron Atoms Ground States and X- ray Excitation

Supplementary Figure 1. Visible (λ = 633 nm) Raman spectra of a-co x layers. (a) Raman spectra of

Fundamentals of Spectroscopy for Optical Remote Sensing. Course Outline 2009

Outline. Surface, interface, and nanoscience short introduction. Some surface/interface concepts and techniques

Transcription:

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)-2 Louis Scudiero http://www.wsu.edu/~scudiero; 5-2669 Fulmer 261A Electron Spectroscopy for Chemical Analysis (ESCA)

The 3 step model: 1.Optical excitation 2.Transport of electron to the surface (diffusion energy loss) 3.Escape into the vacuum Solid electron hn Vacuum e e 1 Excitation 2 Diffusion energy loss 3 Escape Photoemission intensity for a normal incidence ) 4 I( total At photon energy of 1254 ev (MgKa x-ray line), H = 0.0002 and C = 1.05 The intensity ratio is I H (90)/ I C (90) = 1.9 x10-4 (Based of the Scofield s calculations of the cross-sections carried out relativistically using the single potential Hartree-Slater atomic model)

Lindau s calculations of the cross-section for isolated atoms (using the oneelectron central-field frozen-core model and first order perturbation theory) ) 4 I( total 0.0001 0.00001 For a photon energy of 1000 ev, H = 0.00005 and C = 0.07 The intensity ratio is I H (90)/ I C (90) = 7.1 x10-3

x 10 3 Survey spectrum survey / 1 10 Name F 1s C 1s Pos. 686.80 289.60 FWHM 1.946 1.669 Area 20272.3 3315.5 At% 66.037 33.963 F 1s 8 CPS 6 4 Loss peaks 2 F KLL C 1s C KLL F 2s 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Binding Energy (ev) Washington State University--Pullman, WA

Six features seen in a typical XPS spectrum 1. Sharp peaks due to photoelectrons created within the first few atomic layers (elastically scattered). 2. Multiplet splitting (occurs when unfilled shells contain unpaired electrons). 3. A broad structure due to electrons from deeper in the solid which are ineslastically scattered (reduced KE) forms the background. 4. Satellites (shake-off and shake-up) are due to a sudden change in Coulombic potential as the photoejected electron passes through the valence band.

5. Plasmons which are created by collective excitations of the valence band Extrinsic Plasmon: excited as the energetic PE propagates through the solid after the photoelectric process. Intrinsic Plasmon: screening response of the solid to the sudden creation of the core hole in one of its atom The two kinds of Plasmon are indistinguishable. 6. Auger peaks produced by x-rays (transitions from L to K shell: O KLL or C KLL). Photoelectron Auger electron

x 10 2 80 F (core level) F 1s peak Sharp Peak (core level) 70 CPS 60 50 40 30 20 x 10 4 10 Variable 0 8 Name O 1s O 1s Pos. 529.81 531.03 FWHM 1.154 1.883 L.Sh. GL(30) GL(30) Area 32191.5 6711.5 XPS O Sp O 1s peak At% 82.748 17.252 O 1s 10 6 694 692 690 688 686 684 682 680 Binding Energy (ev) Washington State University--Pullman, WA CPS 4 2 Washington State University--Pullman, WA 536 534 532 530 528 526 Binding Energy (ev)

x 10 3 Doublet and satellites peaks for Ni and Cr XPS Sp 2p Cr x 10 2 110 45 100 40 Ni 2p 90 Cr 2p 80 35 70 CPS CPS 60 30 50 25 Sat Sat 40 20 30 885 880 875 870 865 860 855 850 Binding Energy (ev) 590 580 570 Binding Energy (ev) Washington State University--Pullman, WA Washington State University--Pullman, WA Multiplet splitting occurs when there are unfilled shells containing unpaired electrons. For instance, transition metals with unfilled p and d orbitals and rare earths with unfilled f orbitals all show multiplet splitting.

Vacancy created by photoionization (unpaired electron left behind (after ionization)) couples with a unpaired electron in the originally incompletely filled shell and generates splitting of the orbital (p, d or f orbitals). Example: Fe 2 O 3 has 5 unpaired electrons in the 3d shell as shown below. Following photoionization in the 3s shell, there are 2 possible final states. Schematic of Multiplet Splitting following photoionization in Fe 3+ and XPS spectrum x 10 3 Fe 2p 40 35 30 CPS 25 20 15 10 740 735 730 725 720 715 710 705 Binding Energy (ev) Washington State University--Pullman, WA

Satellites arise when a core electron is removed by a photoionization. There is a sudden change in the effective charge due to the loss of shielding electrons. (This perturbation induces a transition in which an electron from a bonding orbital can be transferred to an anti-bonding orbital simultaneously with core ionization). Two types of satellite are detected. Shake-up: The outgoing electron interacts with a valence electron and excites it (shakes it up) to a higher energy level. As a consequence the energy core electron is reduced and a satellite structure appears a few ev below (KE scale) the core level position. Shake-off: The valence electron is ejected from the ion completely (to the continuum). Appears as a broadening of the core level peak or contribute to the inelastic background.

Shake-up satellites: distinct peaks a few ev below the main line. Shake-off satellites: broad feature at lower energy w.r.t. to main line. nlm ( r,, ) = Y (, ) R ( r) lm n

Plasmons This feature is specific to clean surfaces. The photoelectron excites collective oscillations in the conduction band (freeelectron gas), so called Plasmons. (discrete energy loss). 35 30 25 x 10 3 XPS Sp Si 2s Si 2s The plasmon (bulk) energy is n: e density, e: charge of e, m: mass of e electron. = p 4 ne ( m 2 ) 1/ 2 CPS 20 15 10 5 plasmon plasmon Surface plasmon: bulk plasmon / 1.414. 195 190 185 180 175 170 165 160 155 150 145 Washington State University--Pullman, WA Binding Energy (ev) For Al, Mg, Na etc the energies are 15.3 ev, 10.6 ev and 5.7 ev, respectively.

Auger features Auger electron emission occurs also when x-rays impinge a sample. Auger electron is initiated by the creation of an ion with an inner shell vacancy. survey Auger electrons are emitted x 10 in the relaxation of the excited 4 80 Cu 2p Peaks 70 ion. An electron from a higher lying energy level fills the inner 60 shell vacancy with the simultaneous 50 emission of an Auger electron. 40 It is a three-electron process. 3 Distinct Auger Peaks are seen in the data for Copper CPS 30 20 10 Cu 2s Washington State University--Pullman, WA Cu Auger Peaks 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Binding Energy (ev) O 1s Cu 3s Cu 3p

Chemical shift arises in the initial state from the displacement of the electronic charge from the atom towards its ligands, reducing the electrostatic potential at the atom. There is a final state shift due to the polarization of the ligand by the core on the central atom. Core electron BE in molecular systems exhibits chemical shifts which are simply related to various quantitative measures of covalency. Greater the electronegativity of the ligands, the greater the BE of the core electron of the ligated atom. Basic concept: The core electrons feel an alteration in the chemical environment when a change in the potential (charge distribution) of the valence shell occurs. For example: let s assume that the core electrons are inside a hollow spherical charged shell. Each core electron then sees a potential V. A change in Q by Q gives a change in V. where V is the chemical shift V = R 1 4 0 Q R Core electrons Valence charge Q

survey / 2 x 10 3 Oxidized surfaces XPS Sp Cr 2p / 7 70 65 x 10 3 Cu 2p peaks 3/2 12 Cr 2p ---data 60 CPS 10 8 6 Oxide peak Elemental Cr Oxide peak Elemental Cr CPS 55 50 45 40 35 Sat Oxide 1/2 Sat Oxide 4 30 590 580 570 Binding Energy (ev) 965 960 955 950 945 940 935 930 925 Binding Energy (ev) Washington State University--Pullman, WA XPS Sp Cr 2p / 2 Oxidized and clean Cr 2p spectra (left). Oxidized and clean Cu 2p spectra (right). The oxide layer resulted in extra peaks (shoulder at higher BE left of the main 12 line). Satellites are also seen on the Cu 2p spectra. x 10 3

Angular Distributions (C.S. Fadley, J.E.S. and R.P. (1974) 5 p 725-754) The mean free paths (IMFP) are in the range of 5-100Å falling within 5 40 Å for inorganic materials. To enhance the surface signal we can vary the photon energy closer to the attenuation length minimum or decrease the angle of electron emission relative to a solid surface. For example: Au 4f IMFP is about 22Å (d) at angle of 90 using AlKa. The depth (d) probed by XPS becomes about 4-5 Å at angle of 10.

Chemical Bonding The curve fitting of the main hydrocarbon line (C x H y ) reveals chemical shifts corresponding to Ether and alcohol groups (C-O at 1.55 ev higher BE), Carbonyl groups (C=O at 2.8 ev higher), Ester and acid functional at 4.2 ev Carbonate groups at 5.2 ev higher BE. Finally, the - * satellite at 291.5 ev appears at the extreme left.

Spin-orbit and lines intensity Multiplet splitting occurs when the system has unpaired electrons in the Valence levels. Example: Mn 2+ 1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 3s 2 3p 6 3d 5 4s 2 (3d 5 all unpaired and with // spins) Also the total electronic angular momentum (j) is a combination of the orbital angular (l) and spin (s) momenta. The j-j coupling is equal to L S where L and S are the total orbital angular and spin momenta, respectively. For angular quantum number l 0 the line is a doublet. (p 1/2, p 3/2 ). Splitting: Final states are given by: j + = l + s and j - = l s Examples: For p orbitals the doublet will be p 1/2 and p 3/2 because l = 1 and s = 1/2 therefore j - = 1/2 and j + =3/2. For d orbitals, the doublet will be d x1 and d x2 because l = and s = 1/2 therefore j - = x1 and j + = x2.

Intensity ratio is given by (2j - +1) / (2j + +1) For p orbitals the ratio is given by 2 x 1/2 +1 = 2 (p 1/2 ) and 2 x 3/2 +1 = 4 (p 3/2 ). Therefore the ratios for p orbitals doublet is 1/2, for d orbitals doublet is 4/6 = 2/3 x 10 2 110 100 90 80 XPS Sp Cr 2p Cr 2p spectrum x 10 3 14 12 10 XPS Sp Au 4f / 1 Au 4f spectrum CPS 70 60 CPS 8 6 50 4 40 2 30 Washington State University--Pullman, WA 590 580 570 Binding Energy (ev) Washington State University--Pullman, WA 92 90 88 86 84 82 80 Binding Energy (ev) Ratio = 1/2 Ratio =??

XPS: It arises as a consequence of the build-up of a positive charge at the surface of non-conducting specimens. The rate of photo-electron loss is greater than that of their replacement from within the specimen. It produces a retarding field at the surface that will e - hn shift the peaks (reduce the KE of the ejected electrons). Suggestions: Static Charging 1) Use of the adventitious Carbon line to correct any shift (most materials exhibit a C 1s line). 2) Deposition of a very thin layer of gold (as use in SEM). 3) Use of a flood gun low energy electrons (0-5 ev). + + + + - - - - -

Static Charging (cont.) Auger: Sample charging is a function of the total electron yield, f ( ). is the sum of secondary electron and backscattering coefficient. > 1 samples charge positively. Auger (and XPS) peaks shift to lower KE (higher BE). < 1 samples charge negatively. Auger (and XPS) peaks shift to higher KE (lower BE). Case 1, the emitted electrons have a reduced KE by a few tens of ev Identification remains possible Case 2, the KE of the emitted electrons increases due to the repulsive forces between the charged surface and emitted electrons. Analysis is often impossible.

Linewidths ( ) The irreducible width in XPS is due to the lifetime of the core hole state = 2 (Ag 3d core level = 10-14 -10-15 s) The resulting line shape is Lorenzian. A core level has a number of decay channels that contribute to the width of the line. Measurement of the lifetime width of a core hole state is complicated by the existence of: 1. Resolution of the instrument: dual anode long tail due to the lifetime width of the K-shell hole. 2. Phonon broadening (excitation of the lattice vibrations) 3. Inhomogeneous broadening (superposition of lines with different chemical shifts).

CPS 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 x 10 2 Mo 3d-s1/7 Mo 3d-s1/7Peak Deconvolution (curve fitting) CPS 22 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 x 10 2 Name Mo 3d Mo 3d Mo 3d Mo 3d Mo 3d Mo 3d Pos. 228.269 231.399 232.293 235.522 229.163 232.392 FWHM 0.796 0.970 2.000 2.000 1.729 2.000 Mo 3d L.Sh. GL(30) GL(30) GL(30) GL(30) GL(30) GL(30) Area 1243.8 809.8 950.3 1328.8 1414.2 2050.6 %Area 15.93 10.38 12.19 17.06 18.12 26.31 Mo 3d Mo 3d Mo 3 Mo 3d 240 238 236 234 232 230 228 226 Binding Ene rgy (e V) CasaXPS (Washington State University, Pullman, Wa) 240 238 236 234 232 230 228 226 Binding Ene rgy (e V) CasaXPS (Washington State University, Pullman, Wa) Photoelectron lines have a Lorenzian shape corresponding to the lifetime of the core hole that is created. Gaussian or Gaussian Lorentzian shape GL(30) curves are often used for curve fitting purposes. Deconvolution of the XPS Mo samples reveals the existence of several Mo species (Mo 0, Mo4+, Mo6+ but others could also be detected: Mo3+ and Mo5+).

Peak Widths and Intensities Peak widths: it is a convolution of the natural width of the core level, the width of the x-ray line and the analyzer resolution: E = 2 2 2 ( E E E n p a ) 1/ 2 Intensities: Only the ratio of area of lines has some meaning (relative concentration). A B b b b bi = I a a : cross-section; : fraction of PE events (w/o intrinsic plasmon excitation); : mean free path; : KE dependent spectrometer transmission and I : area of the line a a a b

Quantitative Analysis 1. Use of standards: I x is the amplitude of the element X in your sample, I x,std is the amplitude of the element X in pure material The concentration of X in your sample is THEN given by C x = I x / I x,std PROBLEM with this approach is that you need a large No of Standards. 2. Modify Method: It introduces the relative sensitivity factor, S x based upon one pure element standard (usually Ag, silver standard). So, if we want to calculate S x : sensitivity for element X from a compound X a Y b we could do it by using: S x = ( A B) A I I x Ag ( pure)

Quantitative Analysis (cont.) S x = ( A B) A I I x Ag ( pure) Where I x is the amplitude of the known compound, (A+B)/A is the 1 / fraction of X atoms and I x / I Ag the ratio of peak to peak amplitudes. THEN from an unknown sample: C x = I x / I Ag. S x = concentration OR to make it self consistent C x = (I x / S x ) / a (I a / S a ) where I x and I a are measured and S x and S a are obtained from standards as mentioned above

Deconvolution of Si 2p spectrum XPSPeak41 (free software)