Information Retrieval and Web Search

Similar documents
Boolean and Vector Space Retrieval Models

CS276A Text Information Retrieval, Mining, and Exploitation. Lecture 4 15 Oct 2002

Information Retrieval

Boolean and Vector Space Retrieval Models CS 290N Some of slides from R. Mooney (UTexas), J. Ghosh (UT ECE), D. Lee (USTHK).

Information Retrieval. Lecture 6

Dealing with Text Databases

Scoring (Vector Space Model) CE-324: Modern Information Retrieval Sharif University of Technology

Scoring (Vector Space Model) CE-324: Modern Information Retrieval Sharif University of Technology

Recap of the last lecture. CS276A Information Retrieval. This lecture. Documents as vectors. Intuition. Why turn docs into vectors?

Scoring (Vector Space Model) CE-324: Modern Information Retrieval Sharif University of Technology

Term Weighting and Vector Space Model. Reference: Introduction to Information Retrieval by C. Manning, P. Raghavan, H. Schutze

Term Weighting and the Vector Space Model. borrowing from: Pandu Nayak and Prabhakar Raghavan

TDDD43. Information Retrieval. Fang Wei-Kleiner. ADIT/IDA Linköping University. Fang Wei-Kleiner ADIT/IDA LiU TDDD43 Information Retrieval 1

Scoring, Term Weighting and the Vector Space

Information Retrieval

Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung

Retrieval by Content. Part 2: Text Retrieval Term Frequency and Inverse Document Frequency. Srihari: CSE 626 1

PV211: Introduction to Information Retrieval

CS 572: Information Retrieval

RETRIEVAL MODELS. Dr. Gjergji Kasneci Introduction to Information Retrieval WS

CAIM: Cerca i Anàlisi d Informació Massiva

Introduction to Information Retrieval (Manning, Raghavan, Schutze) Chapter 6 Scoring term weighting and the vector space model

Chap 2: Classical models for information retrieval

Retrieval Models. Boolean and Vector Space Retrieval Models. Common Preprocessing Steps. Boolean Model. Boolean Retrieval Model

Informa(on Retrieval

1 Information retrieval fundamentals

Informa(on Retrieval

Ranked IR. Lecture Objectives. Text Technologies for Data Science INFR Learn about Ranked IR. Implement: 10/10/2017. Instructor: Walid Magdy

Vector Space Scoring Introduction to Information Retrieval Informatics 141 / CS 121 Donald J. Patterson

Vector Space Scoring Introduction to Information Retrieval INF 141 Donald J. Patterson

Ranked IR. Lecture Objectives. Text Technologies for Data Science INFR Learn about Ranked IR. Implement: 10/10/2018. Instructor: Walid Magdy

Natural Language Processing. Topics in Information Retrieval. Updated 5/10

Information Retrieval Basic IR models. Luca Bondi

.. CSC 566 Advanced Data Mining Alexander Dekhtyar..

IR Models: The Probabilistic Model. Lecture 8

Lecture 4 Ranking Search Results. Many thanks to Prabhakar Raghavan for sharing most content from the following slides

Artificial Neural Networks. Part 2

Modern Information Retrieval

Vector Space Model. Yufei Tao KAIST. March 5, Y. Tao, March 5, 2013 Vector Space Model

16 The Information Retrieval "Data Model"

Querying. 1 o Semestre 2008/2009

INFO 4300 / CS4300 Information Retrieval. slides adapted from Hinrich Schütze s, linked from

Fall CS646: Information Retrieval. Lecture 6 Boolean Search and Vector Space Model. Jiepu Jiang University of Massachusetts Amherst 2016/09/26

Introduction to Information Retrieval

Outline for today. Information Retrieval. Cosine similarity between query and document. tf-idf weighting

Dimensionality reduction

Lecture 5: Web Searching using the SVD

Neural Networks. Associative memory 12/30/2015. Associative memories. Associative memories

Information Retrieval

13 Searching the Web with the SVD

9 Searching the Internet with the SVD

Bloom Filters and Locality-Sensitive Hashing

CSE 494/598 Lecture-4: Correlation Analysis. **Content adapted from last year s slides

Extended IR Models. Johan Bollen Old Dominion University Department of Computer Science

Motivation. User. Retrieval Model Result: Query. Document Collection. Information Need. Information Retrieval / Chapter 3: Retrieval Models

Information Retrieval

Part I: Web Structure Mining Chapter 1: Information Retrieval and Web Search

Web Information Retrieval Dipl.-Inf. Christoph Carl Kling

Information Retrieval and Topic Models. Mausam (Based on slides of W. Arms, Dan Jurafsky, Thomas Hofmann, Ata Kaban, Chris Manning, Melanie Martin)

Latent Semantic Analysis. Hongning Wang

Generic Text Summarization

Sparse vectors recap. ANLP Lecture 22 Lexical Semantics with Dense Vectors. Before density, another approach to normalisation.

ANLP Lecture 22 Lexical Semantics with Dense Vectors

Information Retrieval

PV211: Introduction to Information Retrieval

Manning & Schuetze, FSNLP (c) 1999,2000

vector space retrieval many slides courtesy James Amherst

Document Similarity in Information Retrieval

MATRIX DECOMPOSITION AND LATENT SEMANTIC INDEXING (LSI) Introduction to Information Retrieval CS 150 Donald J. Patterson

Ranking-II. Temporal Representation and Retrieval Models. Temporal Information Retrieval

The Boolean Model ~1955

Ranked Retrieval (2)

CS630 Representing and Accessing Digital Information Lecture 6: Feb 14, 2006

Towards Collaborative Information Retrieval

CS47300: Web Information Search and Management

3. Basics of Information Retrieval

Manning & Schuetze, FSNLP, (c)

Pivoted Length Normalization I. Summary idf II. Review

INFO 4300 / CS4300 Information Retrieval. slides adapted from Hinrich Schütze s, linked from

Linear Algebra Background

Variable Latent Semantic Indexing

Lecture 2 August 31, 2007

Lecture 2: IR Models. Johan Bollen Old Dominion University Department of Computer Science

What is Text mining? To discover the useful patterns/contents from the large amount of data that can be structured or unstructured.

boolean queries Inverted index query processing Query optimization boolean model January 15, / 35

Chapter 10: Information Retrieval. See corresponding chapter in Manning&Schütze

Non-Boolean models of retrieval: Agenda

Logistic Regression. Machine Learning Fall 2018

N-bit Parity Neural Networks with minimum number of threshold neurons

Query. Information Retrieval (IR) Term-document incidence. Incidence vectors. Bigger corpora. Answers to query


CHAPTER 3 THE COMMON FACTOR MODEL IN THE POPULATION. From Exploratory Factor Analysis Ledyard R Tucker and Robert C. MacCallum

Query Propagation in Possibilistic Information Retrieval Networks

Integrating Logical Operators in Query Expansion in Vector Space Model

Information Retrieval and Web Search Engines

CMPS 561 Boolean Retrieval. Ryan Benton Sept. 7, 2011

Lecture 5: Introduction to (Robertson/Spärck Jones) Probabilistic Retrieval

Part A. P (w 1 )P (w 2 w 1 )P (w 3 w 1 w 2 ) P (w M w 1 w 2 w M 1 ) P (w 1 )P (w 2 w 1 )P (w 3 w 2 ) P (w M w M 1 )

Vector, Matrix, and Tensor Derivatives

CSCE 561 Information Retrieval System Models

Transcription:

Information Retrieval and Web Search IR models: Vector Space Model IR Models Set Theoretic Classic Models Fuzzy Extended Boolean U s e r T a s k Retrieval: Adhoc Filtering Brosing boolean vector probabilistic Structured Models Non-Overlapping Lists Proximal Nodes Algebraic Generalized Vector Lat. Semantic Index Neural Netorks Probabilistic Inference Netork Belief Netork Brosing Flat Structure Guided Hypertext Slide 1

Vector-Space Model t distinct terms remain after preprocessing Unique terms that form the VOCABULARY These orthogonal terms form a vector space. Dimension = t = vocabulary 2 terms bi-dimensional; ; n-terms n-dimensional Each term, i, in a document or query j, is given a realvalued eight, ij. Both documents and queries are expressed as t- dimensional vectors: d j = ( 1j, 2j,, tj ) Slide 2 Vector-Space Model Query as vector: We regard query as short document We return the documents ranked by the closeness of their vectors to the query, also represented as a vector. Vectorial model as developed in the SMART system (Salton, c. 1970) and standardly used by TREC participants and eb IR systems Slide 3

Graphic Representation Example: D 1 = 2T 1 + 3T 2 + 5T 3 D 2 = 3T 1 + 7T 2 + T 3 5 T 3 Q = 0T 1 + 0T 2 + 2T 3 D 1 = 2T 1 + 3T 2 + 5T 3 Q = 0T 1 + 0T 2 + 2T 3 2 3 T 1 D 2 = 3T 1 + 7T 2 + T 3 T 2 7 Is D 1 or D 2 more similar to Q? Ho to measure the degree of similarity? Distance? Angle? Projection? Slide 4 Document Collection Representation A collection of n documents can be represented in the vector space model by a term-document matrix. An entry in the matrix corresponds to the eight of a term in the document; zero means the term has no significance in the document or it simply doesn t exist in the document. T 1 T 2. T t D 1 11 21 t1 D 2 12 22 t2 : : : : : : : : D n 1n 2n tn Slide 5

Term Weights: Term Frequency More frequent terms in a document are more important, i.e. more indicative of the topic. f ij = frequency of term i in document j May ant to normalize term frequency (tf) across the entire corpus: tf ij = f ij / max{f ij } Slide 6 Term Weights: Inverse Document Frequency Terms that appear in many different documents are less indicative of overall topic. df i = document frequency of term i = number of documents containing term i idf i = inverse document frequency of term i, = log 2 (N/ df i ) (N: total number of documents) An indication of a term s discrimination poer. Log used to dampen the effect relative to tf. Make the difference: Document frequency VS. corpus frequency Slide 7

TF-IDF Weighting A typical eighting is tf-idf eighting: ij = tf ij idf i = tf ij log 2 (N/ df i ) A term occurring frequently in the document but rarely in the rest of the collection is given high eight. Experimentally, tf-idf has been found to ork ell. It as also theoretically proved to ork ell (Papineni, NAACL 2001) Slide 8 Computing TF-IDF: An Example Given a document containing terms ith given frequencies: A(3), B(2), C(1) Assume collection contains 10,000 documents and document frequencies of these terms are: A(50), B(1300), C(250) Then: A: tf = 3/3; idf = log(10000/50) = 5.3; tf-idf = 5.3 B: tf = 2/3; idf = log(10000/1300) = 2.0; tf-idf = 1.3 C: tf = 1/3; idf = log(10000/250) = 3.7; tf-idf = 1.2 Slide 9

Query Vector Query vector is typically treated as a document and also tf-idf eighted. Alternative is for the user to supply eights for the given query terms. Slide 10 Similarity Measure We no have vectors for all documents in the collection, a vector for the query, ho to compute similarity? A similarity measure is a function that computes the degree of similarity beteen to vectors. Using a similarity measure beteen the query and each document: It is possible to rank the retrieved documents in the order of presumed relevance. It is possible to enforce a certain threshold so that the size of the retrieved set can be controlled. Slide 11

Desiderata for proximity If d 1 is near d 2, then d 2 is near d 1. If d 1 near d 2, and d 2 near d 3, then d 1 is not far from d 3. No document is closer to d than d itself. Sometimes it is a good idea to determine the maximum possible similarity as the distance beteen a document d and itself Slide 12 First cut: Euclidean distance Distance beteen vectors d 1 and d 2 is the length of the vector d 1 d 2. Euclidean distance Exercise: Determine the Euclidean distance beteen the vectors (0, 3, 2, 1, 10) and (2, 7, 1, 0, 0) Why is this not a great idea? We still haven t dealt ith the issue of length normalization Long documents ould be more similar to each other by virtue of length, not topic Hoever, e can implicitly normalize by looking at angles instead Slide 13

Second cut: Manhattan Distance Or city block measure Based on the idea that generally in American cities you cannot follo a direct line beteen to points. y x Uses the formula: ManhDist( X, Y ) n i1 x i y i Exercise: Determine the Manhattan distance beteen the vectors (0, 3, 2, 1, 10) and (2, 7, 1, 0, 0) Slide 14 Third cut: Inner Product Similarity beteen vectors for the document d i and query q can be computed as the vector inner product: sim(d j,q) = d j q = t i1 ij iq here ij is the eight of term i in document j and iq is the eight of term i in the query For binary vectors, the inner product is the number of matched query terms in the document (size of intersection). For eighted term vectors, it is the sum of the products of the eights of the matched terms. Slide 15

Properties of Inner Product Favors long documents ith a large number of unique terms. Again, the issue of normalization Measures ho many terms matched but not ho many terms are not matched. Slide 16 Inner Product: Example 1 k1 d2 d6 d7 k2 d4 d1 d5 d3 k1 k2 k3 q dj d1 1 0 1 2 d2 1 0 0 1 d3 0 1 1 2 d4 1 0 0 1 d5 1 1 1 3 d6 1 1 0 2 d7 0 1 0 1 k3 q 1 1 1 Slide 17

Inner Product: Exercise k1 d2 d6 d7 k2 d4 d1 d5 d3 k1 k2 k3 q dj d1 1 0 1? d2 1 0 0? d3 0 1 1? d4 1 0 0? d5 1 1 1? d6 1 1 0? d7 0 1 0? k3 q 1 2 3 Slide 18 Cosine similarity Distance beteen vectors d 1 and d 2 captured by the cosine of the angle x beteen them. Note this is similarity, not distance t 3 d 2 θ d 1 t 1 t 2 Slide 19

Cosine similarity d j dk sim( d j, dk ) d d n i1 Cosine of angle beteen to vectors j k i1 i, j i, k i1 The denominator involves the lengths of the vectors So the cosine measure is also knon as the normalized inner product n 2 i, j n 2 i, k n i 1 Length d j i 2, j Slide 20 Cosine similarity exercise Exercise: Rank the folloing by decreasing cosine similarity: To documents that have only frequent ords (the, a, an, of) in common. To documents that have no ords in common. To documents that have many rare ords in common (ingspan, tailfin). Slide 21

Example Documents: Austen's Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice; Bronte's Wuthering Heights SaS PaP WH affection 115 58 20 jealous 10 7 11 gossip 2 0 6 SaS PaP WH affection 0.996 0.993 0.847 jealous 0.087 0.120 0.466 gossip 0.017 0.000 0.254 cos(sas, PAP) =.996 x.993 +.087 x.120 +.017 x 0.0 = 0.999 cos(sas, WH) =.996 x.847 +.087 x.466 +.017 x.254 = 0.929 Slide 22 Cosine Similarity vs. Inner Product Cosine similarity measures the cosine of the angle beteen to vectors. Inner product normalized by the vector lengths. CosSim(d j, q) = d j d j InnerProduct(d j, q) = d j q q q i 1 t t D 1 = 2T 1 + 3T 2 + 5T 3 CosSim(D 1, Q) = 10 / (4+9+25)(0+0+4) = 0.81 D 2 = 3T 1 + 7T 2 + 1T 3 CosSim(D 2, Q) = 2 / (9+49+1)(0+0+4) = 0.13 Q = 0T 1 + 0T 2 + 2T 3 D 1 is 6 times better than D 2 using cosine similarity but only 5 times better using inner product. ( ij ij i 1 i 1 2 t iq ) iq 2 t 2 D 1 D 2 t 3 Q t 1 Slide 23

Comments on Vector Space Models Simple, mathematically based approach. Considers both local (tf) and global (idf) ord occurrence frequencies. Provides partial matching and ranked results. Tends to ork quite ell in practice despite obvious eaknesses. Allos efficient implementation for large document collections. Slide 24 Problems ith Vector Space Model Missing semantic information (e.g. ord sense). Missing syntactic information (e.g. phrase structure, ord order, proximity information). Assumption of term independence Lacks the control of a Boolean model (e.g., requiring a term to appear in a document). Given a to-term query A B, may prefer a document containing A frequently but not B, over a document that contains both A and B, but both less frequently. Slide 25

Naïve Implementation Convert all documents in collection D to tf-idf eighted vectors, d j, for keyord vocabulary V. Convert query to a tf-idf-eighted vector q. For each d j in D do Compute score s j = cossim(d j, q) Sort documents by decreasing score. Present top ranked documents to the user. Time complexity: O( V D ) Bad for large V & D! V = 10,000; D = 100,000; V D = 1,000,000,000 Slide 26 Practical Implementation Based on the observation that documents containing none of the query keyords do not affect the final ranking Try to identify only those documents that contain at least one query keyord Actual implementation of an inverted index Slide 27

Step 1: Preprocessing Implement the preprocessing functions: For tokenization For stop ord removal For stemming Input: Documents that are read one by one from the collection Output: Tokens to be added to the index No punctuation, no stop-ords, stemmed Slide 28 Step 2: Indexing Build an inverted index, ith an entry for each ord in the vocabulary Input: Tokens obtained from the preprocessing module Output: An inverted index for fast access Slide 29

Step 2 (cont d) Many data structures are appropriate for fast access B-trees, hashtables We need: One entry for each ord in the vocabulary For each such entry: Keep a list of all the documents here it appears together ith the corresponding frequency TF For each such entry, keep the total number of occurrences in all documents: IDF Slide 30 Step 2 (cont d) Index terms df D j, tf j computer database 3 2 D 7, 4 D 1, 3 science 4 D 2, 4 system 1 D 5, 2 Index file lists Slide 31

Step 2 (cont d) TF and IDF for each token can be computed in one pass Cosine similarity also required document lengths Need a second pass to compute document vector lengths Remember that the length of a document vector is the squareroot of sum of the squares of the eights of its tokens. Remember the eight of a token is: TF * IDF Therefore, must ait until IDF s are knon (and therefore until all documents are indexed) before document lengths can be determined. Do a second pass over all documents: keep a list or hashtable ith all document id-s, and for each document determine its length. Slide 32 Time Complexity of Indexing Complexity of creating vector and indexing a document of n tokens is O(n). So indexing m such documents is O(m n). Computing token IDFs can be done during the same first pass Computing vector lengths is also O(m n). Complete process is O(m n), hich is also the complexity of just reading in the corpus. Slide 33

Step 3: Retrieval Use inverted index (from step 2) to find the limited set of documents that contain at least one of the query ords. Incrementally compute cosine similarity of each indexed document as query ords are processed one by one. To accumulate a total score for each retrieved document, store retrieved documents in a hashtable, here the document id is the key, and the partial accumulated score is the value. Input: Query and Inverted Index (from Step 2) Output: Similarity values beteen query and documents Slide 34 Step 4: Ranking Sort the hashtable including the retrieved documents based on the value of cosine similarity Return the documents in descending order of their relevance Input: Similarity values beteen query and documents Output: Ranked list of documented in reversed order of their relevance Slide 35

Standard Evaluation Measures Starts ith a CONTINGENCY table retrieved not retrieved relevant x n 1 = + x not relevant y z n 2 = + y N Slide 36 Precision and Recall From all the documents that are relevant out there, ho many did the IR system retrieve? Recall: Precision: +x From all the documents that are retrieved by the IR system, ho many are relevant? +y Slide 37

Slide 38 What eighting methods? Weights applied to both document terms and query terms Direct impact on the final ranking Direct impact on the results Direct impact on the quality of IR system Slide 39