Welcome to side event. Internationally Designated Areas and their Synergies

Similar documents
Statutory framework of the world network of biosphere reserves UNESCO General Conference 1996

Ethiopia. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Tanzania. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

EABRN, 20 years of History and its Future (East Asia Biosphere Reserve Network)

South Africa. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Cook Islands. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Bahamas. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Protected Areas Information Management Systems and Challenges in Korea Hong, Suk-Hwan. Pusan National University

Geotourism s Contribution to Protected Areas

Vanuatu. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Belize. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Ghana. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Suggestions for Efficient Management of the Protected Areas with Multiple International Designations on Jeju Island

Suriname. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Fiji. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Congo. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Mali. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Cameroon. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Equatorial Guinea. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

WELCOME & INTRODUCTION

Statutory Framework of Biosphere Reserves. The Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. Session 7. Breakout discussion. discuss on regional and interregional. proposals 1. COLLABORATION BETWEEN PROGRAMMES

Carpathians Unite mechanism of consultation and cooperation for implementation of the Carpathian Convention

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Executive Board

PROMOTING NATURE CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE RURAL AREAS OF HONG KONG

Protected areas: model landscapes for sustainable development

REPORT ON ACTIVITIES UNDERTAKEN SINCE THE 25TH SESSION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COORDINATING COUNCIL OF THE MAN & THE BIOSPHERE PROGRAMME

The 26 th Session of the International Coordination Council of the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme (10-13 June 2014 UNESCO) NATIONAL REPORT

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY ON BIOSPHERE RESERVES

Dr Ozlem Adiyaman Earth Sciences and Geo-hazards Risk Reduction Section Division of Ecological and Earth Sciences ( ) NATURAL SCIENCES

West-Estonian Archipelago Biosphere Reserve and Lima Action Plan

GLOBAL GEOPARKS NETWORK

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES

TOWARDS STRATEGIC SPATIAL PLANNING IN JAMAICA: THE NATIONAL SPATIAL PLAN

EUSAIR on sea topics from Slovenian perspective

PROPOSED UNESCO FUNDY BIOSPHERE RESERVE

UNESCO Thematic Initiative. Astronomy and World Heritage

1. Project information Jardines de la Reina National Park: Technical support to strengthen management & World Heritage nomination preparation

Presentation outline

Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ) 2016 Regional Leaders Program. March 22 to April 1, 2016 United Nations, New York

Biosphere Reserves : Bureaucratic Label or Sustainable Landscape. KAERA COETZER, BFN Erasmus, ETF Witkowski

GLOBAL NETWORK OF NATIONAL GEOPARKS. Patrick J Mc Keever

GEOCONSERVATION (GEOPARKS) CASE STUDY

The Arouca Declaration 18 September 2012

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES BIOSPHERE RESERVES: THE FIRST TWENTY YEARS

SPLAN-Natura Towards an integrated spatial planning approach for Natura th January, 2017 Brussels. Commissioned by DG Environment

Geodiversity, Geoheritage & Geoconservation

Alps Results from the ESPON Project. Common spatial perspectives for the Alpine area. Towards a common vision

Key biodiversity areas. A Programme for Sustaining the Most Important Sites for Nature

DETERMINE OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES IN IZMIR

Natura 2000 and spatial planning. Executive summary

cooperating sites as the three initial units of a new Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve, approved by UNESCO in 1988.

SWOS (The Satellite-based Wetland Observation Service) Satellite images for peatland monitoring and management Kathrin Weise, Jena-Optronik GmbH

Developing a Global Guideline for Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas: Input from Asia

November 23, 2017 D-2

50 th GEF Council Meeting June 07 09, 2016 Washington, D.C. GEF/C.50/Inf.07 May 11, 2016 PROGRESS REPORT ON THE GENDER EQUALITY ACTION PLAN

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

UNESCO Man and the Biosphere (MAB) Programme International Coordinating Council 29th Session, Paris, 12 to 15 June National Report of Japan

Papahanaumokuakea 11 th Pacific Science Inter-congress Papeete, Tahiti. March 2009

M. Mikoš. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

CAMP SLOVENIA. Mezek Slavko RRC Koper. Project coordinator November 2005

River basin management in a transboundary context: Norwegian experience

ANNEX II DRAFT PROPOSED OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARKS

The Global Fundamental Geospatial Data Themes Journey. April Clare Hadley WG Chair

Coastal Inundation Forecasting Demonstration Project (CIFDP)

TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Overview of Process, Content and Approach

Executive Board Hundred and ninety-fifth session

Education for Climate Change in the Pacific

NEWSLETTER ON THE EVENT Issue 2

Jordan's Strategic Research Agenda in cultural heritage

ACTION PLAN FOR WORLD HERITAGE IN LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN ( )

Ontario s Niagara Escarpment A UNESCO World Biosphere Reserve

Japan-MAB side event 4 th International Biosphere Reserve Congress 16 March, Lima, Peru

Marine Spatial Planning in Hellas; Recent Facts and Perspectives

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

The National Spatial Strategy

Economic and Social Council

Country reports. Israel did not establish an Exclusive Economic Zone. Consequently, its jurisdiction is restricted to the Israeli territorial waters.

Asian Marine Geology : A Gate to the Future

Al Ain Cultural Heritage Management Strategy 1/102

Geoparks A powerful new development vehicle for regional Australia

ANNEX I AND AND GEOPARKS PROGRAMME

The European Union and its Overseas Entities

Sustainable tourism development monitor: university as a driver for sustainable tourism based on experience and lessons from China ---

Monitoring of Tropical Deforestation and Land Cover Changes in Protected Areas: JRC Perspective

UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE. Road Maps for Mainstreaming Ageing

E/CONF.105/158/CRP.158

Making the SDGs work for the Lake Chad Basin

International Conference. Safeguarding African World Heritage as a Driver of Sustainable Development

Summary: This paper updates the Sub-committee on current thinking regarding the proposal for a Cotswolds Geopark

17 th Session of RA IV

Other effective area based conservation. The case of Colombia

Spatial units (Levels 0 and 1)

06/04/2015. Overview: Spatial units. Advancing the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Spatial units (Level 1)

Economic and Social Council

Training on national land cover classification systems. Toward the integration of forest and other land use mapping activities.

Spatial Units (Level 1)

Draft Resolution X.00

Wetland Programmes. Biodiversity assessments in determining wetland conservation priorities: a catchment approach. Dr. Piet-Louis Grundling

Urban-Rural Partnerships in Europe

Transcription:

Welcome to side event Internationally Designated Areas and their Synergies

IUCN Project: Improving the Integrated Management of Multiple Internationally Designated Areas Dr. Thomas Schaaf IUCN Consultant

World Heritage designation: 1980 Area: 12,600 ha Ramsar designation: 1980 Area: 12,600 ha Biosphere Reserve designation: 1977 Area: 14,100 ha Ichkeul National Park (Tunisia)

World Heritage site: Jeju Volcanic Island and Lava Tubes Designated in 2007 / Area: 9,475 ha

Jeju Island Biosphere Reserve Designated in 2002 / Area: 81,914 ha

Jeju Island Global Geopark Designated in 2010 / Area: 181,400 ha Mt. Hallasan crater Manjang cave Tuff rings Columnar Joints

4 Ramsar sites on Jeju Island (Republic of Korea) Ramsar site Dongbaekdongsan Designated in 2011 / Area: 59h (within GG) Ramsar site Mulyeongari-oreum Designated in 2006 / Area: 31 ha (within GG) Ramsar site 1100 Altitude Wetland Designated in 2009 / Area: 13 ha (within WH/BR/GG) Ramsar site Muljangori-oreum Wetland Designated in 2008 / Area: 63 ha (within WH/BR/GG)

Benefits of sites with multiple international designations: Increased visibility and prestige of individual site Marketing as a tourism destination Enhanced possibility for attracting national and international funding for conservation and site management Multiple international labels often renders a site more resistant against other land-uses (mineral exploitation, agricultural expansion, urban sprawl ) Instils pride to local communities that their site is internationally recognized

Challenges of sites with multiple international designations: Different reporting requirements and reporting cycles: Biosphere Reserves: 10 years World Heritage sites: 6-7 years Ramsar sites: 6 years (also for triennial COP) and ad hoc updating of RSIS in data base Global Geoparks: 4 years -- Administrative burden for site managers (funding and staff) In some countries: different national authorities in charge of a specific designation Confusion among local population on inflation of different labels

2012 IUCN World Conservation Congress (Jeju Island, Republic of Korea) Resolution WCC-2012-Res-052: calls for the establishment of an integrated management system for UNESCO protected areas, i.e. Biosphere Reserves, natural World Heritage sites and Global Geoparks. This resolution inter alia expresses its concern that different management guidelines, time cycles and periods provided and monitored by different authorities impedes the establishment of a comprehensive management regime for individual sites that carry multiple international designations. Resolution requests the [IUCN] Director General to develop an integrated conservation management manual that includes guidelines for the systematic conservation and sustainable use of ecosystems, to develop and standardize a management system for protected areas including the integration of the different cycles for re-evaluation of designations, and to distribute it as a model for IUCN Members.

Some statistics: Protected areas worldwide: 209,429 (source: 2014 UN List of Protected Areas) - Ramsar sites: 2,208 - Natural World Heritage sites: 197 (plus 31 mixed sites) - Biosphere Reserves: 651 - Global Geoparks: 111 Quadruple designations: 1 Triple designations: 51

Some statistics: Protected areas worldwide: 209,429 (source: 2014 UN List of Protected Areas) NO. OF SITES - Ramsar sites: 2,208 - Natural World Heritage sites: 197 (plus 31 mixed sites) - Biosphere Reserves: 651 250 - Global Geoparks: 111 200 193 Quadruple designations: 1 Triple designations: 51 150 111 100 91 Double designations: 50 20 15 13 0 RS & WH RS & BR RS & GG WH & BR WH & GG BR & GG

Table: List of sites with overlapping designations Country Ramsar site World Heritage site France Baie du Mont Saint- Michel (1994 / 62,000 ha / 48⁰40'N ; 01⁰40'W) France Camargue (1986 / 85,000 ha / 43⁰30'N ; 04⁰30'E) Mont Saint-Michel and its Bay (1976 / 6,560 ha / 48⁰38'8.016''N ; 01⁰30'38.016''W) Biosphere Reserve Camargue (1977 / 13,117 ha / 43⁰30'N ; 04⁰30'E) Global Geopark France Luberon-Lure (1997 / 179,600 ha / 44 02 N to 43 39 N ; 4 58' to 5 55'E) Parc Naturel Régional du Luberon (2005 / 195,300 ha / 43 81' N ; 5 44' E)

In preparation: Guidance Document To be launched at 2016 IUCN World Conservation Congress in Hawai i (USA) Target audiences: o Site managers o Authorities at national levels o Global Secretariats (Ramsar, World Heritage, Biosphere Reserves, Global Geoparks) o Other relevant international programmes and bodies Content: Synoptic and comparative overview of the four designating bodies/instruments Case studies from the world over (int. workshop in Jeju, Rep. of Korea, April 2015) Recommendations based on good practises Motion on how to harmonize management of sites with multiple designations

Where do you see: (1) Benefits of sites with multiple international designations? (2) Challenges of sites with multiple international designations? According to your experience: (3) How can the management of sites with multiple international designations be improved? Thank you!