Topic 9-1: Bloch Theorem and the Central Equation Kittel Pages:

Similar documents
6.730 Physics for Solid State Applications

Electrons in a weak periodic potential

Nearly-Free Electrons Model

Electrons in a periodic potential

The Schrodinger Equation and Postulates Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case:

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 9, February 8, 2006

Section 4.6 Negative Exponents

Solid State Physics FREE ELECTRON MODEL. Lecture 14. A.H. Harker. Physics and Astronomy UCL

CHAPTER 11. SEQUENCES AND SERIES 114. a 2 = 2 p 3 a 3 = 3 p 4 a 4 = 4 p 5 a 5 = 5 p 6. n +1. 2n p 2n +1

Three Most Important Topics (MIT) Today

7.4. Why we have two different types of materials: conductors and insulators?

The Sommerfeld Polynomial Method: Harmonic Oscillator Example

Topic 11-3: Fermi Levels of Intrinsic Semiconductors with Effective Mass in Temperature

7. Numerical Solutions of the TISE

CHEM6085: Density Functional Theory

Electronic Structure of Crystalline Solids

Opinions on quantum mechanics. CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II. 6.1: The Schrödinger Wave Equation. Normalization and Probability

Photonic band structure in periodic dielectric structures

6.730 Physics for Solid State Applications

Math 280 Modern Algebra Assignment 3 Solutions

1 Multiplicity of the ideal gas

Electrons in periodic potential

ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline:

Math 138: Introduction to solving systems of equations with matrices. The Concept of Balance for Systems of Equations

3.23 Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Materials

The Ginzburg-Landau Theory

Topological insulator part II: Berry Phase and Topological index

Cool Results on Primes

Continuum Limit and Fourier Series

Introduction to Condensed Matter Physics

Lecture-XXV. Time-Independent Schrodinger Equation

88 CHAPTER 3. SYMMETRIES

Wavefunction and electronic struture in solids: Bloch functions, Fermi level and other concepts.

Section 1.2. Row Reduction and Echelon Forms

Generators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations

Lecture 6. Tight-binding model

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case

5.5. Representations. Phys520.nb Definition N is called the dimensions of the representations The trivial presentation

Topic 2-2: Derivatives of Vector Functions. Textbook: Section 13.2, 13.4

Topic 5-1: Introduction to Phonons Kittel pages: 91, 92

Intro/Review of Quantum

5.9 Representations of Functions as a Power Series

Intro/Review of Quantum

Chem120a : Exam 3 (Chem Bio) Solutions

Chapter Intended Learning Outcomes: (i) Understanding the relationship between transform and the Fourier transform for discrete-time signals

Lesson 21 Not So Dramatic Quadratics

Math Lecture 3 Notes

Lecture 6 Photons, electrons and other quanta. EECS Winter 2006 Nanophotonics and Nano-scale Fabrication P.C.Ku

E = hν light = hc λ = ( J s)( m/s) m = ev J = ev

Lecture 3. Energy bands in solids. 3.1 Bloch theorem

2. Electronic states and quantum confined systems

Quantum Modeling of Solids: Basic Properties

HWK#7solution sets Chem 544, fall 2014/12/4

27. The pole diagram and the Laplace transform

No Solution Equations Let s look at the following equation: 2 +3=2 +7

Algebra & Trig Review

Solid State Physics 460- Lecture 5 Diffraction and the Reciprocal Lattice Continued (Kittel Ch. 2)

Roger Johnson Structure and Dynamics: Displacive phase transition Lecture 9

Ch. 12 Rational Functions

Minimal coupling and Berry s phase

5.1. Integer Exponents and Scientific Notation. Objectives. Use the product rule for exponents. Define 0 and negative exponents.

Lecture 4: Basic elements of band theory

5.3 Other Algebraic Functions

Band Structure Calculations; Electronic and Optical Properties

Fourier Transform for Continuous Functions

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 7, February 1, 2006

Chapter 1: Useful definitions

CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II

Lecture 6. Four postulates of quantum mechanics. The eigenvalue equation. Momentum and energy operators. Dirac delta function. Expectation values

Math 90 Lecture Notes Chapter 1

ECE 535 Theory of Semiconductors and Semiconductor Devices Fall 2015 Homework # 5 Due Date: 11/17/2015

Introduction to Parallelism in CASTEP

ALGEBRA II: A. Survey of Functions. Jeff Shriner

Practical Guide to Density Functional Theory (DFT)

LESSON EII.C EQUATIONS AND INEQUALITIES

Generating Function Notes , Fall 2005, Prof. Peter Shor

PGSS Discrete Math Solutions to Problem Set #4. Note: signifies the end of a problem, and signifies the end of a proof.

Lecture-XXVI. Time-Independent Schrodinger Equation

Ordinary Differential Equations Prof. A. K. Nandakumaran Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

Unit 7: Factoring Quadratic Polynomials

Coherent manipulation of atomic wavefunctions in an optical lattice. V. V. Ivanov & A. Alberti, M. Schioppo, G. Ferrari and G. M.

[Disclaimer: This is not a complete list of everything you need to know, just some of the topics that gave people difficulty.]

Lecture 11: Long-wavelength expansion in the Neel state Energetic terms

CHAPTER 6 Quantum Mechanics II

Electron levels in a periodic potential: general remarks. Daniele Toffoli January 11, / 46

Bessel s and legendre s equations

MATH 308 COURSE SUMMARY

Section 7.4: Inverse Laplace Transform

Chapter 20. Countability The rationals and the reals. This chapter covers infinite sets and countability.

+ V = 0, j = 1,..., 3N (7.1) i =1, 3 m = 1, N, X mi, V X mi. i = 0 in the equilibrium. X mi X nj

Analysis II: The Implicit and Inverse Function Theorems

2. If the values for f(x) can be made as close as we like to L by choosing arbitrarily large. lim

1.5 Inverse Trigonometric Functions

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 26 Sep 2013

Section 2.4: Add and Subtract Rational Expressions

Appendix A. The Particle in a Box: A Demonstration of Quantum Mechanical Principles for a Simple, One-Dimensional, One-Electron Model System

Solving Equations Quick Reference

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

LESSON 7.2 FACTORING POLYNOMIALS II

(i) Represent discrete-time signals using transform. (ii) Understand the relationship between transform and discrete-time Fourier transform

Transcription:

Topic 9-1: Bloch Theorem and the Central Equation Kittel Pages: 167-174 Summary: We begin here by postulating Bloch s theorems which develop the form of the wavefunction in a periodic solid. We then show that the second postulate of Bloch s theorem can be derived from the first. As we continue to prove Bloch s first theorem we also derive the central equation as a result of the process this proof takes. Finally, we introduce the vanishing potential and a physical interpretation of Bloch s theorem. We started with the free electron model, which assumed an infinite square well potential However, in reality the bottom of the well isn t flat; the nuclei create potential wells that are periodic within the box Now we will consider a periodic solid through Bloch s theorem o Bloch s theorem is just a way to describe the wavefunction for periodic solids o Bloch s theorem constrains ψ and thus E for periodic solids Bloch s theorem contains two postulates o 1) Because we have a solid that is periodic at the atomic scale, we get a traveling wave solution ( ) for ψ that is modulated by the translational symmetry of the lattice ( ) = where = + Wavefunction reflects the symmetry of the lattice via Traveling wave solution suggests that we must have invoked periodic boundary conditions for the macroscopic solid. Indeed we will when we prove Bloch-1. o 2) Alternatively, we can describe the wavefunction a + =. Which is to say, in a slightly different way, the wavefunction at r+t is very related to the wavefunction at r. c is a modulation term, we ll explore in detail below Proof that Bloch-2 falls out of Bloch-1: We re going to start with the Bloch-1 postulate above, and then.

By replacing r with r+t, we can write the wavefunction as: + = () + [1] o But we have defined to be periodic in T: = + = o Combining these expressions together, we obtain: + = () [2] [3] Since some of the exponential terms cancel in the above we end up with + = [4] But wait, this is Bloch-2 Cool, now we know what c must be. From cell to cell, the wavefunction varies by a phase shift given by All Bloch s theorem does is connect the wavefunction of the solid to terms of the underlying translational symmetry Proof of Bloch-1: Now let s prove that = To get this done, we re going to first have to convert the Schrodinger equation into a form suitable for periodic samples. Development of Fourier series expressions for ψ and V The potential is periodic so we can write it as a Fourier series = where we sum over the reciprocal lattice since the periodicity of the potential is on the atomic scale As this is a proof, we re not going to assume that the wavefunction has a periodicity on the length scale of the unit cell. However, we will invoke periodic boundary conditions. As such, the wavefunction needs to repeat itself every length L, such that ψ(x)=ψ(x+l) Can write this as a Fourier series as well = where = " and n is an integer o k needs to involve waves that are periodic with L not a (This is a critical and often overlooked subtlety) Remember we are working on two different length scales:

Colorado School of Mines o Microscopic scale periodicity in the crystal translational symmetry o Periodicity at the macroscopic scale - periodic boundary conditions in L Insertion of Fourier series expressions for ψ and V into TISE Take our Fourier series expansions for ψ and V and plug them into the time independent Schrodinger equation (TISE) to solve for energy Using the one electron approximation we get ħ + = " [5] After taking some derivatives we end up with ħ + () = [6] Trickery to simplify the periodic version of the TISE Can take advantage of the orthogonality of the wave vectors o Generally, "# " =, where k and k are different wave vectors o Only for k = k do we get a nonzero value for this integral o If we multiply our TISE by and then take the integral with respect to r the sums drop out due to the aforementioned orthogonality [ ħ + () ] = [7] From evaluating this we get: ħ + = [8] o Drop the prime on the k because we are no longer summing in k o This is the central equation. Very nice. Now we re doing the science. Central equation is the TISE expressed in Fourier series form for a periodic structure. It may not look like the TISE, since the ψ is no longer obviously present. However, remember that ψ is now defined in terms of ck terms: =, which are in there Extracting out the wave function s form from the central equation in a rather delicate way: For a particular k and to solve for the energy the only other coefficients we need to know are those shifted by : the other within the o So in essence we only care about our original k point and the k points shifted by g1 or -g1 (for a 1D crystal)

Don t care about any k points between these important points o The utility of the central equation is that it takes a set of N points, each with its own Fourier coefficient, and knocks the sum down to only a handful of points that are needed to solve for the energy of our system Doesn t matter which original k point we choose Can develop N independent equations, one for each k point in the first brillouin zone For a 1D sample 1 cm long that gives 10 7 independent solutions Eventually we will figure out which are nonzero and will throw out the rest Can take = and rewrite it so that it is periodic on the atomic scale = () (delicate, yes?) Now we are building from waves that satisfy periodicity in the sample as well as the atomic scale Now back to Bloch s theorem: Recall we wanted to prove: = We can solve for modulation term u by separating out the term o = o Therefore, = which is periodic at the atomic scale Can show that = and by extension = First implementation of Bloch: The vanishing potential If the potential is periodic, but so weak that it is vanishing, we can estimate our potential as a flat box and our dispersion will basically be parabolic like the free electron model But since we still have periodic boundary conditions, = and we thus repeat our parabolas at at k+g, k-g, k+2g and so on for the dispersion Definition: Call one parabola centered at k=0 the extended zone scheme Definition: Call multiple parabolas the periodic zone scheme These schemes contain the same information since =

Definition: Usually plot the reduced zone scheme, the dispersion within just the first Brillouin zone 1 st brillouin zone is between the dotted lines Physical interpretation of Bloch s theorem: Wavefunction is periodic at two length scales: o u is periodic in T (the atomic scale, lattice spacing a) o is periodic in L (sample scale) Multiplying "[] "[ ] we get how the real part of ψ is modulated