RADIATION EFFECTS ON HIGH TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTORS Harald W. Weber Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology Vienna, Austria From ITER to DEMO Neutron Spectra Neutron-induced Defects in HTS Practical Materials HTS 4 Fusion Conductor Workshop, KIT, 27 May 2011
ITER From ITER to DEMO HTS Magnets? DEMO YBCO, BiSCCO, MgB 2 The cooling power could be significantly reduced. The radiation shields could be significantly reduced and simplified. Higher magnetic fields could be achievable. Smaller coil geometries would become feasible. Could He be replaced?
Options / Materials Demo design (magnetic field, temperature, fluence) Cheaper: MgB 2 Higher fields: HTS Bi-2212: 10 K Bi-2223: 20 K Coated conductors (RE-123): 50 K Higher temperatures: Coated conductors (RE-123) ~ 65-77 K
NEUTRON SPECTRA Production of 14 MeV neutrons deposition of energy in the first wall substantial material problems (~1 MW/m²)! At the magnet location: Attenuation by a factor of ~ 10 6. Scattering processes lead to a thermalization of the neutrons! The lifetime fluence of the ITER magnets amounts to 1 x 10 22 m -2 (E > 0.1 MeV)
DAMAGE ENERGY SCALING (E) neutron cross section T(E) primary recoil energy distribution F(E) neutron flux density distribution t irradiation time in the neutron spectrum F(E) < (E). T(E) > displacement energy cross section E D = < (E). T(E) >. F(E). t damage energy (total energy transferred to each atom in the material) SUCCESSFUL SCALING OF T c AND J c IN METALLIC SUPERCONDUCTORS PREDICTIONS OF PROPERTY CHANGES IN AN UNAVAILABLE NEUTRON SPECTRUM ARE FEASIBLE!
DAMAGE PRODUCTION in SUPERCONDUCTORS FAST NEUTRONS (E > 0.1 MeV) Displacement cascade initiated by the primary knock-on atom, if its energy exceeds 1 kev EPITHERMAL NEUTRONS (1 100 kev) Point defect clusters THERMAL NEUTRONS Transmutations, point defects -rays: No influence HTS: Fast neutrons produce stable collision cascades because of their low conductivity
Neutron-induced Defects in HTS STATISTICALLY DISTRIBUTED ~ SPHERICAL, ~ 2.5 nm Ø SURROUNDED BY A STRAIN FIELD OF THE SAME SIZE 22-3 22-2 5 x 10 defects m per 10 neutrons m FAST NEUTRONS (E>0.1 MeV) COLLISION CASCADES, IF THE ENERGY OF THE PRIMARY KNOCK-ON ATOM EXCEEDS 1 kev M. Frischherz et al.: Physica C 232, 309 (1994)
YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7- - Y-123
CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PRIMARY SUPERCONDUCTIVE PROPERTIES: Introduction of disorder mainly O-displacements 92 91 transition temperature (K) 90 89 88 87 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 fast neutron fluence (10 21 m -2 ) M. Eisterer et al.: Adv. Cryog. Eng. 46, 655 (2000) F.M. Sauerzopf: PRB 57, 10959 (1998)
Consequences for flux pinning H c H a,b
The same defects act differently in different materials Example: parallel columnar defects c-axis Y-123 ( 3D ): Peak for H parallel to columns Bi-2212 ( 2D ): Reduction of J c anisotropy M. Kraus et al.: Phys. Bl. 50, 333 (1994)
Experimental J c data (Am -2 ) 1x10 21 m -2 8x10 21 m -2 F.M. Sauerzopf: PRB 57, 10959 (1998)
Model defects in 2D Bi-2223 tapes Connolly et al., TU-Delft 2000
Critical Currents at 77 K unirr. 3*10 19 m -2 10 8 HIIab HIIc J c (A/m 2 ) 10 7 10 6 80 18.5 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 µ 0 H (T) S. Tönies et al.: IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 3904 (2001)
Irreversibility Lines 6 5 4 H ab unirr. 6*10 18 m -2 1.2*10 19 m -2 2*10 19 m -2 µ 0 H(T) 3 2 H c unirradiated 6*10 18 m -2 3*10 19 m -2 5.5*10 19 m -2 1 1.2*10 19 m -2 2*10 19 m -2 0 3*10 19 m -2 5.5*10 19 m -2 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 T(K)
Y-123: Similar behavior of fission tracks and collision cascades Fission Tracks Collision Cascades 10 10 5 K J c (Am -2 ) 10 9 30 K 50 K 60 K 10 8 70 K 77 K 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 B (T) M. Eisterer et al.: SUST 11, 1001 (1998)
SUMMARY: NEUTRON - INDUCED DEFECTS 3D HTS: Strong pinning of flux lines for H c Reduced intrinsic pinning through disorder (H a,b) 2D HTS: Pinning of a few individual pancakes Reduced intrinsic pinning through disorder (H a,b)
PRACTICAL MATERIALS 4 HTS compounds suitable for fusion applications 1) MgB 2 (T c ~ 39 K) Low temperature (5 10 K) and intermediate field (< 10 T) application (PF) 2) Bi-2212 (T c ~ 87 K) ITER like fields up to 25 K (intrinsic limit) 3) Bi-2223 (T c ~ 110 K) 1G conductors are now being replaced by RE- 123 coated (2G) conductors ITER like fields up to 30 K (intrinsic limit) 4) RE-123 (T c ~ 92 K) ITER like fields up to 60 K, higher T operation possible Magnetic field applications at T > 50 K only with RE-123 HTS compounds
MgB 2 Wires Pure MgB 2 is anisotropic: = H ab c2 /H c c2 ~ 5 Grains are randomly oriented: different upper critical fields in different grains! Distribution function: 0.40 0.35 relative abundance 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 B B c2 (T) c2 B c2 M. Eisterer et al.: JAP 98, 033960 (2003)
Irreversibility line can be shifted by an increase of B c2 and / or by a reduction of the anisotropy: B ab 0 B 2 2 c 1 p 2 c 1 Neutron irradiation increases B c2 and decreases. 1 M. Eisterer et al.: JAP 98, 033960 (2003) 14 12 10 B (T) 8 6 4 2 undamaged irradiated B c2 B =0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 T (K)
Neutron irradiation: B c2 B =0 J c (B) at high magnetic fields Cu-sheathed wire J c (Am -2 ) 10 9 unirradiated 2x10 22 m -2 10 8 1000 100 10 I c (A) 10 7 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 H (T) Introduction of defect cascades is less important, grain boundary pinning is dominant! M. Eisterer et al.: SUST 15, 1088 (2002)
Critical currents can be fully explained by a percolation model (solid lines) 10 9 10 8 unirr. irr. bulk (5 K) wire (4.2 K) J c (A/m 2 ) 10 7 10 6 10 5 10 4 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 B(T) J c ( p( J ) pc B) 1 p c 1.79 dj M. Eisterer et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 247002 (2003)
EXTRAPOLATED PERFORMANCE at 4.2 K 10 11 10 10 10 9 B c2 =74 T, =1.85 J c (Am -2 ) 10 8 10 7 10 6 B c2 =55 T, =3.2 B c2 =40 T, =4.3 10 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 B(T)
Coated conductors Focus on commercial tapes
Microstructure Key elements: J c GB (grain boundaries inter-grain currents) relevant at small fields grain boundary angle doping J c G (grains intra-grain currents) relevant at high fields pinning centres J c vs. field orientation current Homogeneity along (long) lengths
Irreversibility Lines 16 64 K 77 K coated conductors µ 0 H ab µ 0 H c 14 77 K H c 12 BSCCO multifilament tape µ 0 H ab µ 0 H c AMSC Bruker 5.6 T 7.7 T µ 0 H (T) 10 8 6 Sumitomo 1.15 T 4 2 0 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 T (K)
Neutron irradiation 4x10 10 2x10 10 J c intra : improved J c (Am -2 ) 10 10 8x10 9 6x10 9 T = 64 K unirradiated irradiated 2x10 21 m -2 J c inter : degraded 4x10 9 irradiated 4.15x10 21 m -2 irradiated 1x10 22 m -2 0.01 0.1 1 µ 0 H (T)
Neutron irradiation effects on J c for H parallel c: Bruker HTS
Neutron irradiation effects on J c anisotropy: AMSC Reduced critical currents for fields parallel a,b Improved critical currents for fields parallel c At higher neutron fluence: second peak
Summary: Critical Current Densities (J C ) H a,b H c 10 10 "PF/CC coils" "TF/CS coils" 10 10 "PF/CC coils" µ 0 H c coated conductors 77 K 64 K BSCCOmultifilament tape 30 K 20 K "TF/CS coils" J C (Am -2 ) 10 9 10 8 µ 0 H ab coated conductors 77 K 64 K BSCCOmultifilament tape 50 K 40 K J C (Am -2 ) 10 9 10 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 µ 0 H (T) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 µ 0 H (T) The ellipses represent possible design requirements for fusion magnets (ITER specification). A field of around 6 T is specified for the ITER PF coils and of around 13 T for the CS/TF coils. The range of current densities between 10 8 Am -2 and 10 10 Am -2 is highlighted.
The engineering critical current densities J E need to be improved! 10 10 2.1x10 8 J C (Am -2 ) 10 9 2.1x10 7 J E (Am -2 ) µ 0 H ab µ 0 H c 77 K 64 K 50 K 10 8 0.1 1 10 µ 0 H (T) 2.1x10 6
but alternative materials exist RE-123 (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd) Higher T c Higher irreversibility fields at 77 K 94 Y-123 Nd-123 SmGd-123 93 T c (K) 92 91 90 89 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 fast neutron fluence (10 21 m -2 ) M. Eisterer et al.: Adv. Cryog. Eng. 46, 655 (2000) R. Fuger et al.: Physica C 470, 323 (2010)
and new commercial cc s, partly with artificial pinning centers intrinsic pinning correlated pinning shoulders
but we need cables with highly demanding performance at high fields and temperatures high amperage (some 10 ka) long lengths high homogeneity low J c anisotropy low ac losses high stress tolerance e.g. Roebel cables or striated conductors
Homogeneity of cables or striated tapes (magnetoscan analysis) Homogeneity of the cable Identify damage of single strands Striated tape
CONCLUSIONS Cc s are close to the field requirements of ITER / DEMO magnets at elevated temperatures Neutron irradiation is beneficial as long as T c is not too much depressed ( ) Neutron irradiation reduces the J c anisotropy (may not be so important AP s!) but Cable development is needed Y-substitution may be advisable Neutron irradiation to higher fluences is required Homogeneity issues must be carefully addressed and all the other issues discussed at this conference must be solved!!
CO-WORKERS and COLLABORATIONS CO-WORKERS at ATI Michael Eisterer René Fuger Florian Hengstberger Martin Zehetmayer Johann Emhofer Michal Chudy COLLABORATIONS SuperPower / University of Houston: V. Selvamanickam American Superconductor: A. Malozemoff Bruker HTS: A. Usoskin Industrial Research: N. Long Hypertech: M. Sumption Sumitomo Electric Industries: K. Sato FZ Karlsruhe: W. Goldacker