EAGLE concept, as part of the HELM vision

Similar documents
EAGLE Data Model and Outcomes of HELM (Harmonised European Land Monitoring)

EAGLE Data Model and Outcomes of HELM (Harmonised European Land Monitoring)

State-of-play... The EAGLE concept conceptual basis for a future European Land Monitoring Framework

THE OVERALL EAGLE CONCEPT

The EAGLE Concept - Paving the way for a new European Land Monitoring System

Towards a harmonised land monitoring system: NRC bottom-up activities in EAGLE and HELM H

The EAGLE-Concept. A Data Model for Future Land Monitoring

Copernicus for Statistics

The EAGLE concept - first practical implementations. Title. Stephan Arnold. Position Gebhard Banko. Place, Copenhagen, date 20.

Validation and verification of land cover data Selected challenges from European and national environmental land monitoring

SIF_7.1_v2. Indicator. Measurement. What should the measurement tell us?

EAGLE data model for land monitoring - Use cases and state of play

LAND COVER CHANGES IN ROMANIA BASED ON CORINE LAND COVER INVENTORY

Problems arising during the implementation of CLC2006

Standardization of the land cover classes using FAO Land Cover Classification System (LCCS)

Pilot studies on the provision of harmonized land use/land cover statistics: Synergies between LUCAS and the national systems

CORINE LAND COVER CROATIA

INSPIRE Land Cover and Land Use Data Specifications

UK Contribution to the European CORINE Land Cover

Spanish national plan for land observation: new collaborative production system in Europe

Applied spatial data for sustainable development strategy in Germany

LUCAS: current product and its evolutions

Land Cover and Land Use Diversity Indicators in LUCAS 2009 data

System of Environmental-Economic Accounting. Advancing the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting. Extent Account (Levels 1 and 2)

SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting

Land accounting perspective on water resources management

Global Land Cover Mapping

The LISA extension to INSPIRE LC/LU data model: The Austrian experience

Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services

Discussion paper on spatial units

INSPIRE Thematic Cluster on Land Cover and Land Use & Feedback from implementers

Object based modelling of habitats with EO data: Semantic and technical challenges to achieve interoperability

Multifunctional theory in agricultural land use planning case study

INSPIRE Land Cover and Land Use workshop

Technical specifications for implementation of a new land-monitoring concept based on EAGLE

Technical specifications for implementation of a new land-monitoring concept based on EAGLE

Supplementary material: Methodological annex

The Combination of Geospatial Data with Statistical Data for SDG Indicators

Land Use and Land cover statistics (LUCAS)

Accounting Units for Ecosystem Accounts Paper prepared by Alessandra Alfieri, Daniel Clarke, and Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division

The EAGLE concept A vision of a future European Land Monitoring Framework

2.1.2 Land cover data

Land Monitoring Core Service Implementation Group (LMCS IG) - Results and Outlook

SATELLITE MAPPING OF BULGARIAN LAND COVER CORINE 2012 PROJECT. Abstract

GISCO Working Party Meeting. 8 March 2012 Luxembourg. The ESPON 2013 Programme: State of Affairs. Marjan van Herwijnen project expert in the ESPON CU

Extent. Level 1 and 2. October 2017

Copernicus Land HRL Imperviousness: 2012 dataset, indicator Title

Directorate E: Sectoral and regional statistics Unit E-4: Regional statistics and geographical information LUCAS 2018.

UNSD SEEA-EEA revision 2020

Spatial Units, Scaling and Aggregation (Level 1) October 2017

INDICATORS FOR INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (ICZM)

Spatial Disaggregation of Land Cover and Cropping Information: Current Results and Further steps

LUCAS 2009 (Land Use / Cover Area Frame Survey)

DEVELOPMENT OF DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHIC DATABASE FOR MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Land cover research, applications and development needs in Slovakia

Measuring and Monitoring SDGs in Portugal: Ratio of land consumption rate to population growth rate Mountain Green Cover Index

INSPIREd solutions for Air Quality problems Alexander Kotsev

The Combination of Geospatial Data with Statistical Data for SDG Indicators

Use of auxiliary information in the sampling strategy of a European area frame agro-environmental survey

Habitats habitat concept, identification, methodology for habitat mapping, organization of mapping

Strengthening Global Forest resilience and user oriented services

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

Contents Introduction... 3 Get the data... 4 Workflow... 7 Test 1: Urban fabric (all)... 8 Test 2: Urban fabric (industrial and commercial)...

Green Space Services for Local Monitoring

An Update on Land Use & Land Cover Mapping in Ireland

Technical specifications for implementation of a new land-monitoring concept based on EAGLE

Núria Blanes, Stefan Kleeschulte Geir Harald Strand, Geoff Smith, Gerard Hazeu, Gergely Maucha

NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT

The Role of EO Consultants and SMEs within GMES. Geoff Smith

FOREST CHANGE DETECTION BY MEANS OF REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES FROM THE EU PROJECT CORINE LAND COVER

Copernicus for Coastal Zone Monitoring and Management

IAEG SDGs WG GI, , Mexico City

LAND USE, LAND COVER AND SOIL SCIENCES - Vol. I - Land Use and Land Cover, Including their Classification - Duhamel C.

Adding value to Copernicus services with member states reference data

Sampling scheme for LUCAS 2015 J. Gallego (JRC) A. Palmieri (DG ESTAT) H. Ramos (DG ESTAT)

a national geological survey perspective François ROBIDA BRGM (French Geological Survey)

Common geographies for dissemination of SDG Indicators

C N E S, U M R I R I S A

2.- Area of built-up land

Presentation of the different land cover mapping activities in the French Guiana

Training on national land cover classification systems. Toward the integration of forest and other land use mapping activities.

Sharing soil information with the help of INSPIRE, key challenges with soil data management

Object Oriented Classification Using High-Resolution Satellite Images for HNV Farmland Identification. Shafique Matin and Stuart Green

LUCAS: A possible scheme for a master sampling frame. J. Gallego, MARS AGRI4CAST

Plan4all (econtentplus project)

Spatial Units (Level 1)

GIS FOR MAZOWSZE REGION - GENERAL OUTLINE

sentinel-2 COLOUR VISION FOR COPERNICUS

L A N D C O P E R N I C U S. Den Haag, Land Monitoring

SWOS (The Satellite-based Wetland Observation Service) Satellite images for peatland monitoring and management Kathrin Weise, Jena-Optronik GmbH

ISO Land Cover for Agricultural Regions of Canada, Circa 2000 Data Product Specification. Revision: A

Comparing CORINE Land Cover with a more detailed database in Arezzo (Italy).

Open call for tenders No EEA/MDI/14/001

EU collaborations with NASA LCLUC Program & Current Priorities

Land accounting in Québec: Pilot project for a sub-provincial area

Capabilities and Limitations of Land Cover and Satellite Data for Biomass Estimation in African Ecosystems Valerio Avitabile

High Resolution Land Use Information by combined Analysis of Digital Landscape Models and Statistical Data Sets. Tobias Krüger Gotthard Meinel

European Regional and Urban Statistics

Geometric and Landcover Signatures of Local Authorities in Peloponnesus

E-Government and SDI in Bavaria, Germany

Transcription:

EAGLE concept, as part of the HELM vision EAGLE working group Barbara Kosztra (Hungary), Stephan Arnold (Germany), Lena Hallin-Pihlatie & Elise Järvenpää (Finland) 16.06.2014 HELM / EAGLE Workshop - INSPIRE Conference, Aalborg 1

Given situation in European LM I. Diverse applications of LC/LU information => many classification systems and nomenclatures. Focus on different aspects of LC/LU Different data collection methods Different scales, Narrow tailored-to-purpose definitions, Incomparable precision/degree of class definitions, Lack of completeness for either LC or LU information. 16.06.2014 HELM / EAGLE Workshop - INSPIRE Conference, Aalborg 2

Given situation in European LM II. The CLC experience Incomplete representation of different biogeographical regions Mixing LC and LU information Fuzzy class definitions: ambiguous description, semantic gaps and inconsistencies Only selectively handling of temporal aspect (transitional phenomena, altering status) Missing thematic content (grassland / wetland types, cultivation practices) No attribution of spatial units No integration of newly appearing landscape phenomena 16.06.2014 HELM / EAGLE Workshop - INSPIRE Conference, Aalborg 3

Criteria for LM data model I. Conceptual point of view Separation between LC and LU information, Mutually exclusive and comprehensive list of land cover components, Applicability on different scales, Applicability on national and European level Semantic translation between different classification systems, INSPIRE compliance, Support the bottom-up approach, Integration of parameters, Flexibility in structure for adding new model elements. 4

Criteria for LM data model II. Thematic content point of view Data model should store information about.. soil sealing degree, crown cover density, habitats / ecosystem types, crop types, land management forms and cultivation patterns, spatial pattern, status, temporal patterns, transitional phenomena among others. 5

Criteria cross table 6

EAGLE principles - Object orientation Classifications Grassland pasture lawn natural grassland Characterization Growth structure homogenous heterogenous Growth density closed sparse Moisture Wet soil Surface water Use intensiv extensiv Sports Management Multiple mowing Single mowing Ecosystem type 16.06.2014 Inland marsh HELM / EAGLE Workshop - INSPIRE Conference 2014, Aalborg 7

EAGLE principles - Decomposing landscape Solve questions of geometry/spatial structure (reference grid, generalzation) Online matrix population tool Testing matrix against classification systems, model against real databases EAGLE model as European extansion of ISO LCML Interest shown by: MS, EEA (newclc?), INSPIRE-community, Eurostat Financing: Copernicus..? (EAGLE mentioned in communication on continuation of Copernicus) Ursus Wehrli 8

Content of EAGLE model Information on landscape described with three separate main blocks I.) LAND COVER Components LCC Abiotic (Artificial + Natural), Vegetation, Water Surfaces => no classes, but elements II.) LAND USE Attributes LUA Agriculture, Forestry, Residential, Transportation etc. III.) CHARACTERISTICS CH further information on: spatial pattern, bio-physical parameters, ecosystem types, cultivation measures, land management practices etc. 9

CORINE classes Structure of EAGLE Matrix I. LCC block II. LUA block III. CH block 10

I. Land Cover Components [LCC] Describe real landscape elements from pure LC point of view. (Read Matrix from top to bottom.) 11

II. Land Use Attributes [LUA] Describe territory from pure LU point of view, according to function and socio-economic purpose, linked to INSPIRE (extract shown only) 12

III. further Characteristics [CH] Characterize landscape with additional properties, flexible extendable list (extract shown only) 13

Structure of the EAGLE data model Description of Landscape with help of Land Cover Components (LCC), Land Use Attributes (LUA) and Characteristics (CH) CH -... -... + LC Unit (1..* LCC) LU Attributes ABIOTIC LCCs (Artificial/Natural) CH Characteristics BIOTIC LCCs (Vegetation) CH -... -... -... -... WATER LCCs + + + CH -... -... -... -... 14

How to use EAGLE matrix: Describing mixed forest with EAGLE model a) As a nomenclature, attaching a single LCC to each geometrical land surface unit / grid sample point b) Describing the land cover composition of each land surface unit or nomenclature class by attaching more than one LCC to it c) Describing componential rates by assigning percentage values to LCCs of a given land surface unit (polygon or grid cell) or nomenclature class ATKIS Nadelwald Mischwald Mischwald LCC Coniferous Trees Coniferous & Broadleaf trees coniferous 65% Broadleaved 35 % 15

How to use EAGLE matrix: Describing wetland with EAGLE model Land cover components (LCC): Inland water Reeds Land use attributes (LUA): Nature protection site Recreational area Further characteristics (CH): Barbara Kosztra Ecosystem type = inland marsh Salinity = 0% (fresh water) Water regime = perennial 16

How to use EAGLE matrix: Describing village with EAGLE model Land cover components (LCC): conventional buildings, broadleaved trees, herbaceous plants, open sealed surfaces Land use attributes (LUA): permanent residential, agriculture/production for own consumption, road network Further characteristics (CH): soil sealing degree = 35% built-up pattern = discontinuous, single houses Gyorgy Büttner HELM/EAGLE workshop - INSPIRE 2014, Aalborg, Denmark 17

EAGLE matrix/modell application EAGLE matrix for Analytical decomposition of class definitions Semantic translation between different classification systems EAGLE model for Collection and mapping of land related information Conceptual basis for harmonized future European Land Monitoring Framework HELM COOKBOOK: EAGLE concept is not another classification system but a descriptive tool for harmonization of LC/LU information between national & European levels 18

Grid Approach StA1 2 options to represent land: Option 1: delinetation of identified units with polygons StA9 Option 2: proportion of LC/LU units inside regular grid cell 19

Slide 19 StA1 StA9 Grid Approach heading in this slide Stephan Arnold, 6/15/2014 this expression is not introduced, overlap with "criteria" for data model. is confusing here. better say it like here already changed Stephan Arnold, 6/15/2014

Grid Approach Original Raster: 1 (dominant) single value per pixel + + + + Grid: multiple layer data (%, abs.) stored in every grid cell... 20

Grid Approach Grid cells can be populated with any kind of data: - LC/LU information - Population register (pop density, number of commutors, unemployment rate etc.) 21

Grid Approach - Benefits Allows a dual-track system, where MS proceed at different speed Can benefit from EAGLE model as European extension of ISO standard 19144-2 LCML standard Can utilise Copernicus products INSPIRE compliant Fosters cooperation between MS and EU Allows European monitoring systems build on continuous monitoring programs at national level Cost-efficient Integration of information, not of datasets 22

Next steps and future perspectives EAGLE received status of EIONET working group Call for expression of interest (CEI) by EEA for continuation of EAGLE work EAGLE/HELM included in Copernicus 2014 work programme and implementation plan, future development to be supported New data situation: SENTINEL generation ahead, opened LANDSAT archives tackle and improve temporal (so far unsolved) issues EAGLE model as part of INSPIRE Land Cover data specification EAGLE model as European extension of LCML Strategic aspects: continuation of HELM (1) for building up an operational integrated land monitoring system 2.0 23

Who is EAGLE? EAGLE = EIONET Action Group on Land monitoring in Europe (Eionet: expert network of European Environmental agency - EEA) Voluntary, independent, open working group LC/LU experts from: - National Reference Centers (NRC) Land Cover, - INSPIRE TWGs, - ETC SIA partners, - FP7 HELM consortium Founded through self-initiative of experts from various European countries (AT, CH, CZ, DE, ES, FI, HU, NL, NO, PT, UK) Self-financing (apart from travel costs and seconding of experts) 24

Thank you for your attention! Further information: sia.eionet.europa.eu/eagle kosztra.barbara@fomi.hu, stephan-arnold@geo-concept.de, 25