THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. Spring 2009

Similar documents
1 Introduction: connections and fiber bundles

1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle

+ dxk. dt 2. dt Γi km dxm. . Its equations of motion are second order differential equations. with intitial conditions

Chapter 3. Riemannian Manifolds - I. The subject of this thesis is to extend the combinatorial curve reconstruction approach to curves

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURE 12-13,

Lecture: Lorentz Invariant Dynamics

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M.

5 Constructions of connections

Appendix to Lecture 2

Week 6: Differential geometry I

Tutorial General Relativity

Solving the Geodesic Equation

4.7 The Levi-Civita connection and parallel transport

2.1 The metric and and coordinate transformations

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, LECTURE 16-17, JULY 14-17

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.)

Christoffel Symbols. 1 In General Topologies. Joshua Albert. September 28, W. First we say W : λ n = x µ (λ) so that the world

Hyperbolic Geometry on Geometric Surfaces

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

Classical differential geometry of two-dimensional surfaces

1 Euclidean geometry. 1.1 The metric on R n

Math 6455 Nov 1, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech

Choice of Riemannian Metrics for Rigid Body Kinematics

UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN

Calculus of Variations Summer Term 2014

Math 5378, Differential Geometry Solutions to practice questions for Test 2

Introduction to Algebraic and Geometric Topology Week 14

Lectures 15: Parallel Transport. Table of contents

SELECTED SAMPLE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS - MATH 5378, SPRING 2013

Tensor Analysis in Euclidean Space

Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

I. HARTLE CHAPTER 8, PROBLEM 2 (8 POINTS) where here an overdot represents d/dλ, must satisfy the geodesic equation (see 3 on problem set 4)

Two dimensional manifolds

Relativistic Mechanics

Lagrangian for Central Potentials

Vectors, metric and the connection

Course Summary Math 211

Chapter 14. Basics of The Differential Geometry of Surfaces. Introduction. Parameterized Surfaces. The First... Home Page. Title Page.

j=1 ωj k E j. (3.1) j=1 θj E j, (3.2)

Arc Length and Riemannian Metric Geometry

Some aspects of the Geodesic flow

Introduction to General Relativity

5.2 The Levi-Civita Connection on Surfaces. 1 Parallel transport of vector fields on a surface M

Math 234 Final Exam (with answers) Spring 2017

VARIATIONAL PRINCIPLES

7 Curvature of a connection

Robotics. Islam S. M. Khalil. November 15, German University in Cairo

Lecture 8. Connections

Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008

PHYS 705: Classical Mechanics. Euler s Equations

We begin our discussion of special relativity with a power point presentation, available on the website.

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 5

Geodesic Equivalence in sub-riemannian Geometry

Functional differentiation

MATH 434 Fall 2016 Homework 1, due on Wednesday August 31

1 Differentiable manifolds and smooth maps

Metrics and Curvature

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

B.7 Lie Groups and Differential Equations

Affine Connections: Part 2

Chapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance

Curved spacetime and general covariance

Some topics in sub-riemannian geometry

Part IB Geometry. Theorems. Based on lectures by A. G. Kovalev Notes taken by Dexter Chua. Lent 2016

PHYM432 Relativity and Cosmology 6. Differential Geometry

Notes for an Introduction to General Relativity. Fall 2011.

LECTURE 16: CONJUGATE AND CUT POINTS

Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1

3 The Friedmann-Robertson-Walker metric

CS Tutorial 5 - Differential Geometry I - Surfaces

Lecture 6, September 1, 2017

A crash course the geometry of hyperbolic surfaces

Physics 351, Spring 2017, Homework #4. Due at start of class, Friday, February 10, 2017

On isometries of Finsler manifolds

HYPERBOLIC GEOMETRY AND PARALLEL TRANSPORT IN R 2 +

Physics 325: General Relativity Spring Final Review Problem Set

The existence of light-like homogeneous geodesics in homogeneous Lorentzian manifolds. Sao Paulo, 2013

Derivatives in General Relativity

Multivariable Calculus Notes. Faraad Armwood. Fall: Chapter 1: Vectors, Dot Product, Cross Product, Planes, Cylindrical & Spherical Coordinates

LECTURE 2. (TEXED): IN CLASS: PROBABLY LECTURE 3. MANIFOLDS 1. FALL TANGENT VECTORS.

Tutorial Exercises: Geometric Connections

Chapter 16. Manifolds and Geodesics Manifold Theory. Reading: Osserman [7] Pg , 55, 63-65, Do Carmo [2] Pg ,

Invariant Nonholonomic Riemannian Structures on Three-Dimensional Lie Groups

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

Exercise 1 (Formula for connection 1-forms) Using the first structure equation, show that

3 Parallel transport and geodesics

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY HW 4. Show that a catenoid and helicoid are locally isometric.

Some Research Themes of Aristide Sanini. 27 giugno 2008 Politecnico di Torino

Möbius Transformation

going vertically down, L 2 going horizontal. Observer O' outside the lift. Cut the lift wire lift accelerates wrt

JUST THE MATHS UNIT NUMBER INTEGRATION APPLICATIONS 10 (Second moments of an arc) A.J.Hobson

As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).

Mathematics that Every Physicist should Know: Scalar, Vector, and Tensor Fields in the Space of Real n- Dimensional Independent Variable with Metric

carroll/notes/ has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general

Symmetries 2 - Rotations in Space

Major Ideas in Calc 3 / Exam Review Topics

Introduction to Differential Geometry

General Relativity and Cosmology. The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang

Transcription:

[under construction] 8 Parallel transport 8.1 Equation of parallel transport Consider a vector bundle E B. We would like to compare vectors belonging to fibers over different points. Recall that this was the main problem preventing from the possibility of differentiating sections without an extra structure such as a connection. We wish to approach it now from a different angle. Suppose initially that the bundle E is trivial, i.e., E = B R k or E = B C k. In this case fibers over different points can be canonically identified with the same space R k or C k. Two vectors over different points are the same if they are equal as elements of this standard fiber. If we are speaking about the tangent vectors (say, to an open set in R n ), then they are visualized as directed segments attached to the corresponding points. Two vectors at points P and Q are equal if the directed segments specifying them can be transformed one into another by a parallel translation. Parallel translation, in particular, preserves lengths of vectors. Now let E be a subbundle of a trivial bundle B V. (For example, the tangent bundle for a surface in R n or the tautological line bundle over a projective space.) We can still try to apply parallel translation in the ambient space V, i.e., the identity transformation, but then a problem will be that a vector from a fiber E P over a point P B translated to a point Q, i.e., the same vector as an element of the space V, will almost never be in the space E Q. For example, a tangent vector to the circle x 2 + y 2 = 1 at P = (1, 0) translated identically to Q = (0, 1) will be normal to the circle at that point. A remedy that can be suggested is to consider the (identical) parallel translation of a vector from space E P V in the ambient space V followed by (say, orthogonal) projection onto the space E Q V, thus forcefully making the result of the operation to be in the required space. However, a problem remains: thus constructed linear map E P E Q ceases to preserve lengths of vectors; even worse, it can map certain non-zero vectors to zero. In the above example, so defined map from T (1,0) S 1 to T (0,1) S 1 will be identically zero. Such a problem does not exist if the starting point P and the final 1

point Q are sufficiently close: in this case the projection map is close to the identity on E P and is invertible. Moreover, the lengths of vectors are preserved modulo ε 2 if ε is the order of distance between P and Q. (Note that cos ε = 1 + O(ε 2 ).) The correct understanding of a parallel translation for a subbundle of a trivial vector bundle E B V is thus as follows. To translate a vector u E P V obtaining a vector in E Q V one has to do it in steps each time moving from a point in the base to an infinitesimally close point. In other words, we need to have a curve x(t) joining the points P and Q so that x(0) = P and x(1) = Q. The result of the translation in general will depend on this curve (not only on endpoints). Infinitesimal translation τ(x + εx, x) from E x to E x+εx is defined by τ(x + εx, x)u = P x+εx u. Here we use a formal parameter ε such that ε 2 = 0. For a point x B and a tangent vector X T x B, the sum x ε = x + εx makes good sense as a point of B that is infinitesimally close to x. Denote the result of the infinitesimal parallel translation by u ε. We have u ε = P xε u or P xε (u ε u) = 0 (because the the projector on a fiber maps every vector in the fiber to itself). Since the difference between P xε and P x is of order ε, and the same is true for u ε u, it is possible to replace P xε by P x in the last equation. We arrive at P x (u ε u) = 0 (1) as the equation defining an infinitesimal parallel translation. If we are given a curve, then x = x(t), x ε = x(t + ε), u = u(t), and u ε = u(t + ε); the equality (1) becomes which is equivalent to P x(t) ( u(t + ε) u(t) ) = 0, ( ) du P x(t) = 0. (2) dt The differential equation (2) is called the equation of parallel transport. Recalling that the ordinary derivative in the ambient space followed by the 2

projection is the covariant derivative on the bundle E, we may rewrite the equation of parallel transport also as u dt = 0, (3) which makes sense for an arbitrary vector bundle endowed with a connection. The outcome of our investigation can be summarized in the following definition. Definition 8.1. The parallel translation (or parallel transport) on a vector bundle E B endowed with a connection is a linear transformation τ(q, P, γ): E P E Q for each pair of points P, Q B joined by a curve γ : t x(t), so that x(0) = P and x(1) = Q, that sends a vector u 0 E P to the vector u 1 = u(1) E Q, the value at time t = 1 of the solution u(t) of the differential equation (3) with the initial condition u(0) = u 0. In the simplest cases it is possible to find the parallel translation without solving the differential equation. Example 8.1. If a surface M 2 R 3 is developable on a flat surface (a piece of a plane), then the parallel translation on this surface, i.e., the parallel translation in the tangent bundle, is the same as on that flat surface.... Equation of parallel transport: or, using a local frame, so u = e i u i, t u = 0 du i dt + ẋa A i aj(x(t))u j = 0. For an infinitesimal parallel transport we thus obtain: τ(x 0 + X, x 0 ) = 1 X a A a (x 0 ), where ε 2 = 0.... Solution by multiplicative integral. Theorem 8.1. For a connection compatible with metric, parallel transport is an orthogonal or unitary transformation (in the real or complex cases, respectively). 3

8.2 Geodesic lines Definition 8.2. On a manifold M with a connection, geodesic lines or simply geodesics are defined as curves x = x(t) satisfying the equation ẋẋ = 0, (4) i.e., the condition that the velocity vector ẋ is parallel along the curve. Intuitively, the condition defining geodesics means that they are the straightest lines on M. The equation of geodesics (4) in an explicit form is d 2 x a dt 2 + dx b dx c Γa bc dt dt = 0. (5) Example 8.2. On R n, geodesics are precisely the straight lines in an affine parametrization: x a = v a t + x a 0 in affine coordinates. Indeed, in affine coordinates, Γ a bc = 0 and the equation reduces to d 2 x a = 0. dt 2 Theorem 8.2. Suppose M R N is a submanifold in Euclidean space R N. Then a curve is a geodesic on M if it belongs to M and its acceleration vector in the ambient space R N is perpendicular to M. Proof. Indeed, the orthogonal projection ( ) d 2 x P dt 2 onto T x M is precisely the covariant derivative ẋẋ. The statement of Theorem 8.2 has a clear physical meaning: a particle moves along a geodesic on M if and only if the sum of all forces acting on it has no component along M; there is only a reaction force normal to M and making the particle stay on M R N. Motion along a geodesic is a free motion on M. Example 8.3. Geodesics on S 2 (and on S n for any n) are the great circles, i.e., the sections of S 2 by planes through the center, taken with the natural parametrization (up to a constant factor). 4

Theorem 8.3. For a Riemannian manifold M, the equation of geodesics can be written as d L dt ẋ L x = 0 (6) where L is a function on T M given by the formula Proof. We have L ẋ = g ab(x)ẋ b. a Hence the time derivative will be d dt L = 1 2 (ẋ, ẋ) = 1 2 g ab(x)ẋ a ẋ b. (7) ( ) L = d ( gab (x)ẋ b) = ẋ a c g ab ẋ c ẋ b +g ab ẍ b = 1 dt 2 ( cg ab + b g ac )ẋ b ẋ c +g ab ẍ b. We also have L x = 1 a 2 ag bc ẋ b ẋ c. Hence the Euler Lagrange equation is g ab ẍ b + 1 2 ( bg ac + c g ab a g bc )ẋ b ẋ c = 0 or, equivalently (by multiplying by g pa with summation over a followed by renaming p a), ẍ a + 1 2 gap ( b g pc + c g pb p g bc )ẋ b ẋ c = 0. This is exactly by the Christoffel formulas. ẍ a + Γ a bc ẋ b ẋ c = 0 Corollary 8.1. The parameter t for a geodesic on a Riemannian manifold is the natural parameter (arc length) up to a constant factor. Proof. For any equations of the form (7) if a function L does not explicitly depend on t there is the conservation of energy : the function E = L ẋẋ L, 5

is constant along solutions of (7) (check!). In our case the energy E is the kinetic energy and coincides with L: E = L ẋ a ẋa L = g ab (x)ẋ b ẋ a 1 2 g ab(x)ẋ a ẋ b = 1 2 g ab(x)ẋ a ẋ b = L. Therefore (ẋ, ẋ) is constant, i.e., the magnitude of the velocity velocity vector ẋ is constant. Since for the arc length we have s = t t 0 ẋ dt, we conclude that s = ct + t 0. Alternatively, the same can be seen directly from the definition of geodesics: d(ẋ, ẋ) dt = ẋ(ẋ, ẋ) = ( ẋẋ, ẋ) + (ẋ, ẋẋ) = 2( ẋẋ, ẋ) = 0 due to the equation of geodesics ẋẋ = 0. One can use equation (6) as a shortcut for calculating Christoffel symbols. Example 8.4. For the metric of the sphere S 2 written in coordinates θ, ϕ we have ds 2 = R 2 (dθ 2 + sin 2 θdϕ 2 ).... Remark 8.1. Equation (6) is the necessary and sufficient condition of extremum for the functional S[γ] = t1 t 0 L(x(t), ẋ(t))dt defined by a given function L C (T M), which is called a Lagrangian. Equation (6) is called the Euler Lagrange equation with the Lagrangian L. Remark 8.2. We have defined geodesics as the straightest lines on a manifold. It turns out that on a Riemannian manifold they are also the shortest. They satisfy the Euler Lagrange equation not only for the Lagrangian L = 1 (ẋ, ẋ), 2 6

but also for another Lagrangian L = ẋ = 2L. The corresponding functional is nothing but the arc length of a curve between given t 0 and t 1. Thus geodesics realize the extrema of length. Moreover, it can be shown, that for sufficiently close points on a geodesic, the corresponding geodesic segment gives the minimum of length. Example 8.5. For two points on the sphere, in the generic case there is one geodesic giving the minimum of length and another, the maximum. Last modified: 14 (27) March 2009 7