GIS in Water Resources Exercise #4 Solution

Similar documents
GIS in Water Resources Exercise #4 Solution Prepared by Irene Garousi-Nejad and David Tarboton

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Exercise 4. Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Watershed and Stream Network Delineation

Rick Faber CE 513 Watershed and Streamwork Delineation Lab # 3 4/24/2006

Exercise 5 - Watershed and Stream Network Delineation from DEMs GIS in Water Resources Fall 2014

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Quiz Fall There are 5 questions on this exam. Please do all 5. They are of equal credit.

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Quiz Fall There are 5 questions on this exam. Please do all 5. They are of equal credit.

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2016 There are four questions on this exam. Please do all four. They are not all of equal weight.

CE 394K/CEE6440 GIS in Water Resources Fall 2018 Final Exam Solution

ArcHYDRO: GIS for Water Resources

Hydrology and Watershed Analysis

Using ArcGIS for Hydrology and Watershed Analysis:

GRAPEVINE LAKE MODELING & WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS

A Simple Drainage Enforcement Procedure for Estimating Catchment Area Using DEM Data

Watershed Analysis of the Blue Ridge Mountains in Northwestern Virginia

Within this document, the term NHDPlus is used when referring to NHDPlus Version 2.1 (unless otherwise noted).

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2012 There are five questions on this exam. Please do all five.

A GIS-based Approach to Watershed Analysis in Texas Author: Allison Guettner

Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks. Steve Kopp

GIS in Water Resources Midterm Exam Fall 2008 There are 4 questions on this exam. Please do all 4.

Watershed Modeling With DEMs

Designing a Dam for Blockhouse Ranch. Haley Born

Create A Watershed Profile

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development

Basin characteristics

4. GIS Implementation of the TxDOT Hydrology Extensions

MODULE 7 LECTURE NOTES 5 DRAINAGE PATTERN AND CATCHMENT AREA DELINEATION

Using the Stock Hydrology Tools in ArcGIS

What s New in Topographic Information - USGS National Map

Drainage Area: GL, VPU: 04 - Release Notes. 12/01/2018 Updated and New Data

CE 394K.3 GIS in Water Resources Midterm Quiz Fall There are 5 questions on this exam. Please do all 5. They are of equal credit.

Terrain and Satellite Imagery in Madre de Dios, Peru

Flow on terrains (II)

Lecture 3. Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources

Creating Watersheds from a DEM

Streams in the Ranching Country of South Texas

software, just as word processors or databases are. GIS was originally developed and cartographic capabilities have been augmented by analysis tools.

Building a Hydrologic Base Map Prepared by David R. Maidment Waterways Centre for Freshwater Research University of Canterbury

The National Hydrography Dataset in the Pacific Region. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Hydrography Webinar Series

George Mason University Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering

Management and Sharing of Hydrologic Information of Cache County

13 Watershed Delineation & Modeling

Preparing a NFIE-Geo Database for Travis County

USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) and NHDPlus

Development and Land Use Change in the Central Potomac River Watershed. Rebecca Posa. GIS for Water Resources, Fall 2014 University of Texas

CENTRAL TEXAS HILL COUNTRY FLOOD

Handling Raster Data for Hydrologic Applications

Notes to project: Conflict and cooperation over shared water resources

GIS feature extraction tools in diverse landscapes

REMOTE SENSING AND GEOSPATIAL APPLICATIONS FOR WATERSHED DELINEATION

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

Delineation of Watersheds

What's New with NHDPlus (Classic)?

Using GIS to Delineate Watersheds Ed Poyer NRS 509, Fall 2010

Delineation of the Watersheds Basin in the Konya City and Modelling by Geographical Information System

Lidar-derived Hydrography as a Source for the National Hydrography Dataset

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses Using ArcGIS

3D Elevation Program- Status and Updates. Oklahoma GI Council Meeting November 2, 2018 Claire DeVaughan US Geological Survey

A GIS-based Subcatchments Division Approach for SWMM

BSEN 6220 GIS LAB #5

Visualising time-series data with the Australian Hydrological Geospatial Fabric & the Geofabric Sample Toolbox

NWT Open Report Delineation of Watersheds in the Mackenzie Mountains

Digital Elevation Models. Using elevation data in raster format in a GIS

USGS Hydrography Overview. May 9, 2018

Elevations are in meters above mean sea level. Scale 1:2000

GIS in Water Resources Fall 2018 Homework #1

Application of Geographical Information System (GIS) tools in watershed analysis

Welcome to NetMap Portal Tutorial

A hierarchical network-based algorithm for multi-scale watershed delineation

Model Integration - How WEPP inputs are calculated from GIS data. ( ArcGIS,TOPAZ, Topwepp)

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

Submitted to. Prepared by

Earth Science Regents Watersheds & Drainage Basins Lab

Flooding on the Somerset Levels. ArcGIS Online

Creating Watersheds from a DEM in ArcGIS 9.x

Height Above Nearest Drainage in Houston THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

A Comparison of Manual and Computer-Assisted Drainage Delineation Methods for Hydrologic-Unit Map Development

Squaw Creek. General Information

RiparianZone = buffer( River, 100 Feet )

Lab 1: Landuse and Hydrology, learning ArcGIS II. MANIPULATING DATA

Exercise 2. Building a Base Dataset of the San Marcos Basin

JJ Munoz. Explanation of the Project/Outline

Geographical Information Systems

Watershed Delineation

A GIS View of Hydrology

Chapter 6 Mapping and Online Tools

BDU, IOT By Abeyou Wale April 11-20/2011 Bahir Dar Ethiopia

Introducing Iowa StreamStats Version 4, a Redesign of the USGS Application for Estimating Streamflow Stats

USING GIS TO MODEL AND ANALYZE HISTORICAL FLOODING OF THE GUADALUPE RIVER NEAR NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS

Finding the Relationship Between Elevation and Isotopic Compositions of Stream Waters in the Peruvian Andes

Automatic Watershed Delineation using ArcSWAT/Arc GIS

Workshop: Build a Basic HEC-HMS Model from Scratch

1 Project Summary. 2 Background

USING ESRI s ARCSCENE TO VISUALIZE THE GEOSPATIAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A COAL REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA, AMD SEEPS, AND UNDERGROUND MINING OPERATIONS 1

Stream Correction for Local Government GIS

Transcription:

GIS in Water Resources Exercise #4 Solution 1. Table giving the length of the Logan River main stream from NHDPlus Length (km) column, Landscape.gdb\NHDPlusv shape_length and Logan.gdb\Basemap\LoganMain shape_length. Explain the differences. Comment on which you think is more reliable. [Hint the answer has to do with the coordinate systems used to represent each of these feature classes.] Length from NHD Plus Length Values (km) 52.65 Length from shape length in NHD Plus (km) 70.68 Length from shape length in LoganMain (Projected 53.11 into Albers coordinate system) (km) The first and third lengths are within 0.5 km of each other and are consistent. Differences may be due to slight differences in coordinate system and generalization of the lines. The NHD plus shape length is distorted due to being evaluated in the Web Mercator coordinate system which artificially expands lengths (evidently). 1

2. Prepare a layout showing the topography, Basin Outline, NHDPlusv streams and Logan River Main stem stream for the Logan River Basin. Include a scale bar and North arrow and appropriate title, labeling and legend so that the map is self-describing. 2

Elevation (m) 3. A graph giving the elevation profile of the Logan River main stem. Profile from ArcGIS. Note that lengths on the X axis are inflated. 2700 Logan River Elevation Profile 2500 2300 2100 1900 1700 1500 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 Length from upstream end (m) Elevation Profile prepared using Excel. Note that lengths were computed from the coordinates and scale to the total of 53 km. 3

4. The number of columns and rows, and grid cell size in the Logan DEM. The minimum and maximum elevation values in the Logan DEM. Number of rows: 1466 Number of columns: 968 Cell Size: 30.922 m Min Elevation: 1411.2 m Max Elevation 3037.6 m 5. A layout showing the deepest sink in the Logan River basin. Report the depth of the deepest sink as determined by fil-dem. The depth of Peter Sink, the deepest sink is 61.67 m 4

6. Make a screen capture of the attribute table of fdr and give an interpretation for the values in the Value field using a sketch. Interpretation of flow directions encoded in the Value Field 7. Report the drainage area of the Logan River basin in both number of 30.92 m grid cells and km 2 as estimated by flow accumulation. Report the area of the Logan River basin in km 2 as calculated by the arcgis.com watershed function. Report the area of the Logan River basin in km 2 as reported by the USGS for the Logan River stream site. Discuss reasons for any differences. Flow accumulation: 583809 grid cells = 558.14 km 2 AreaSqKm reported by ArcGIS.com watershed function = 555.38 km 2 USGS Area 214 mi 2 = 554 km 2 These differences are small and arise due to rounding and small difference in flow directions along the edges of the watershed. 5

8. Describe (with simple illustrations) the relationship between StrLnk, DrainageLine, Catchment and CatchPoly attribute and grid values. What is the unique identifier in each that allows them to be relationally associated? The grid values for Catchments and the corresponding StrLnk rasters are the same. These values are inherited by the gridcode attribute of DrainageLine and CatchPoly thereby providing a one to one association between drainage lines and the subwatershed polygon that drains to them. 9. A table giving for each of the tributaries identified above the number of upstream stream links, the total length of upstream stream links, the total upstream area, drainage density (total length/total area), number of downstream links along path to outlet, distance to outlet along the streams. Right hand fork traces. For upstream (left), I used edge flag. For downstream (right) I used junction flag so as not to get the extra length in the tributary stream. 6

Franklin Basin Beaver Mountain Right Hand Fork Franklin Basin Beaver Mountain Number of upstream links 13 13 7 Length Upstream (km) 23.7 52 30.99 Area Upstream (km 2 ) 65.8 89.97 67.1 Drainage Density (km/km 2 ) 0.360 0.578 0.46 Number of downstream links 3 16 18 Length Downstream (km) 17.45 50.08 56.21 7

10. A layout illustrating the longest flow path in the Logan River Basin and giving the length in km. 8