ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Similar documents
ELECTRON DYNAMICS WITH SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

SYNCHROTRON RADIATION

Synchrotron Radiation An Introduction. L. Rivkin Swiss Light Source

Low Emittance Machines

Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations

Synchrotron Radiation

CERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings

Low Emittance Machines

3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics

Accelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.

Insertion Devices Lecture 2 Wigglers and Undulators. Jim Clarke ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory

Synchrotron radiation

Suppression of Radiation Excitation in Focusing Environment * Abstract

Introduction to electron and photon beam physics. Zhirong Huang SLAC and Stanford University

Investigation of the Feasibility of a Free Electron Laser for the Cornell Electron Storage Ring and Linear Accelerator

FEMTO - Preliminary studies of effects of background electron pulses. Paul Scherrer Institut CH-5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland

Low Emittance Machines

Accelerator Physics Final Exam pts.

Introduction to Longitudinal Beam Dynamics

!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS

RADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING

D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1

Tools of Particle Physics I Accelerators

Physics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014

Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor

First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division

Fundamentals of Accelerators

Transverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21

Research with Synchrotron Radiation. Part I

Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC

PBL (Problem-Based Learning) scenario for Accelerator Physics Mats Lindroos and E. Métral (CERN, Switzerland) Lund University, Sweden, March 19-23,

Note. Performance limitations of circular colliders: head-on collisions

RF LINACS. Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN

Longitudinal dynamics Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN

Introduction to Collider Physics

SLAC Summer School on Electron and Photon Beams. Tor Raubenheimer Lecture #2: Inverse Compton and FEL s

E. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse

{ } Double Bend Achromat Arc Optics for 12 GeV CEBAF. Alex Bogacz. Abstract. 1. Dispersion s Emittance H. H γ JLAB-TN

Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source

Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings

Particle Accelerators

Light Source I. Takashi TANAKA (RIKEN SPring-8 Center) Cheiron 2012: Light Source I

Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes

Characteristics and Properties of Synchrotron Radiation

Femto second X ray Pulse Generation by Electron Beam Slicing. F. Willeke, L.H. Yu, NSLSII, BNL, Upton, NY 11973, USA

PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY

Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation. G. A. Krafft Old Dominion University Jefferson Lab Lecture 16

Magnets and Lattices. - Accelerator building blocks - Transverse beam dynamics - coordinate system

4 FEL Physics. Technical Synopsis

Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC

Lattices for Light Sources

Light Sources based on Storage Rings

Beam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1

Medical Linac. Block diagram. Electron source. Bending magnet. Accelerating structure. Klystron or magnetron. Pulse modulator.

Part V Undulators for Free Electron Lasers

On behalf of: F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, Y. Papaphilippou (CERN), N. Milas, A. Streun (PSI/SLS), M. Pivi (SLAC), T.

Free-electron laser SACLA and its basic. Yuji Otake, on behalf of the members of XFEL R&D division RIKEN SPring-8 Center

Laser-Electron Storage Ring Zhirong Huang and Ronald D. Ruth Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (October 16,

Simulations of HL-LHC Crab Cavity Noise using HEADTAIL

An Introduction to Particle Accelerators. v short

Traveling Wave Undulators for FELs and Synchrotron Radiation Sources

SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland

Introduction to Accelerator Physics 2011 Mexican Particle Accelerator School

Synchrotron radiation: A charged particle constrained to move in curved path experiences a centripetal acceleration. Due to it, the particle radiates

Photonuclear Reactions and Nuclear Transmutation. T. Tajima 1 and H. Ejiri 2

Introduction to Particle Accelerators & CESR-C

ThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics

Accelerator Physics. Accelerator Development

Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam

Beam Diagnostics Lecture 3. Measuring Complex Accelerator Parameters Uli Raich CERN AB-BI

Contents. LC : Linear Collider. µ-µ Collider. Laser-Plasma Wave Accelerator. Livingston Chart 6 References

TUNE SPREAD STUDIES AT INJECTION ENERGIES FOR THE CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON BOOSTER

Fundamental Concepts of Particle Accelerators V : Future of the High Energy Accelerators. Koji TAKATA KEK. Accelerator Course, Sokendai

50 MeV 1.4 GeV 25GeV 450 GeV 8 TeV. Sources of emittance growth CAS 07 Liverpool. Sept D. Möhl, slide 1

Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012 Low- alpha mode at SOLEIL 1

Abstract. 1. Introduction

FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*

Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)

6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac

MODERN OPTICS. P47 Optics: Unit 9

2. X-ray Sources 2.1 Electron Impact X-ray Sources - Types of X-ray Source - Bremsstrahlung Emission - Characteristic Emission

Nonlinear Single-Particle Dynamics in High Energy Accelerators

Accelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman

Status of the OSC Experiment Preparations

Terahertz Coherent Synchrotron Radiation at DAΦNE

Linac Driven Free Electron Lasers (III)

LASER-COMPTON SCATTERING AS A POTENTIAL BRIGHT X-RAY SOURCE

Emittance Dilution In Electron/Positron Damping Rings

Longitudinal Dynamics

Accelerator R&D Opportunities: Sources and Linac. Developing expertise. D. Rubin, Cornell University

Electron Linear Accelerators & Free-Electron Lasers

Introduction to Accelerators. Scientific Tools for High Energy Physics and Synchrotron Radiation Research

Particle physics experiments

Modeling CESR-c. D. Rubin. July 22, 2005 Modeling 1

Accelerator Physics Issues of ERL Prototype

COMBINER RING LATTICE

OBSERVATION OF TRANSVERSE- LONGITUDINAL COUPLING EFFECT AT UVSOR-II

Transverse Beam Dynamics II

Transcription:

ELECTRON DYNAMICS with SYNCHROTRON RADIATION Lenny Rivkin École Polythechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Switzerland CERN Accelerator School: Introduction to Accelerator Physics September 5, 2014, Prague, Czech Republic

Useful books and references H. Wiedemann, Synchrotron Radiation Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 H. Wiedemann, Particle Accelerator Physics I and II Springer Study Edition, 2003 A. Hofmann, The Physics of Synchrotron Radiation Cambridge University Press 2004 A. W. Chao, M. Tigner, Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, World Scientific 1999

CERN Accelerator School Proceedings Synchrotron Radiation and Free Electron Lasers Grenoble, France, 22-27 April 1996 (A. Hofmann s lectures on synchrotron radiation) CERN Yellow Report 98-04 Brunnen, Switzerland, 2 9 July 2003 CERN Yellow Report 2005-012 http://cas.web.cern.ch/cas/proceedings.html

Curved orbit of electrons in magnet field Accelerated charge Electromagnetic radiation

Crab Nebula 6000 light years away GE Synchrotron New York State First light observed 1054 AD First light observed 1947

GENERATION OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland

Why do they radiate? Charge at rest: Coulomb field, no radiation Uniformly moving charge does not radiate But! Cerenkov! v = const. Accelerated charge

Bremsstrahlung or braking radiation

Transverse acceleration a v Radiation field quickly separates itself from the Coulomb field

Longitudinal acceleration a Radiation field cannot separate itself from the Coulomb field v

Fields of a moving charge E t = q 4 0 n 1 n 3 2 1 r 2 ret + q 4 0 c n n 1 n 3 2 1 r ret B t = 1 c n E

Moving Source of Waves

Time compression Electron with velocity emits a wave with period T emit while the observer sees a different period T obs because the electron was moving towards the observer n The wavelength is shortened by the same factor in ultra-relativistic case, looking along a tangent to the trajectory obs = 1 2 2 emit since T ( 1nβ) obs T emit ( 1 cos ) obs emit 1 = 1 2 1 + 1 2 2

Radiation is emitted into a narrow cone e v ~ c = 1 e v << c vc

Sound waves (non-relativistic) Angular collimation = e v v s v s + v = v s v 1 s 1 + v v e 1 1 + v s v s v Doppler effect (moving source of sound) heard emitted 1 v v s

Synchrotron radiation power Power emitted is proportional to: P E 2 B 2 P cc E 2 4 2 C = 4 3 r e 5 m e c 2 3 = 8.858 m 10 GeV 3

P cc E The power is all too real! 2 4 2

Typical frequency of synchrotron light Due to extreme collimation of light observer sees only a small portion of electron trajectory (a few mm) l ~ 2 Pulse length: difference in times it takes an electron 1/ and a photon to ~ 1 t ~ 3 0 cover this distance t ~ l c l c = l c 1 t ~ c 1 2 2

Spectrum of synchrotron radiation Synchrotron light comes in a series of flashes every T 0 (revolution period) T 0 the spectrum consists of harmonics of 0 1 T 0 time flashes are extremely short: harmonics reach up to very high frequencies At high frequencies the individual harmonics overlap 3 typ 0 ~ 1 ~ 4000 continuous spectrum! ~ 10 MHz 0 typ 16 Hz!

Wavelength continuously tunable!

Synchrotron radiation power Power emitted is proportional to: P E 2 B 2 P 4 cc E 2 2 P 2 c 3 2 4 2 C = 4 3 r e 5 m e c 2 3 = 8.858 m 10 GeV 3 = 1 137 Energy loss per turn: U 0 = C E 4 hc = 197 Mev fm U 0 = 4 3 hc 4

dp d = P tot c S c S x = 9 3 8 x K5 5 3 x dx x 0 S x dx = 1 P tot = 2 3 hc2 4 2 c = 3 c 3 2 1 0.1 0.01 ~ 2.1x 1 3 G 1 x = x K 5 3 x dx x c ev = 665E 2 GeV B T 50% ~ 1.3 xe x 0.001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 x = c

Flux [photons/s/mrad/0.1%bw] Synchrotron radiation flux for different electron energies 10 13 10 12 LEP Dipole Flux I = 1 ma 100 GeV 50 GeV 10 11 20 GeV 10 10 10 9 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 Photon energy [ev]

Angular divergence of radiation The rms opening angle R at the critical frequency: = c R 0.54 well below «c R 1 c 1 3 0.4 independent of! 1 3 well above» c R 0.6 c 1 2

Radiation effects in electron storage rings Average radiated power restored by RF Electron loses energy each turn RF cavities provide voltage to accelerate electrons back to the nominal energy Radiation damping Average rate of energy loss produces DAMPING of electron oscillations in all three degrees of freedom (if properly arranged!) Quantum fluctuations Statistical fluctuations in energy loss (from quantised emission of radiation) produce RANDOM EXCITATION of these oscillations Equilibrium distributions U 0 10 3 of E 0 V RF > U 0 The balance between the damping and the excitation of the electron oscillations determines the equilibrium distribution of particles in the beam

Radiation is emitted into a narrow cone of only a few mrads opening angle

Synchrotron radiation power Power emitted is proportional to: P E 2 B 2 P 4 cc E 2 2 P 2 c 3 2 4 2 C = 4 3 r e 5 m e c 2 3 = 8.858 m 10 GeV 3 = 1 137 Energy loss per turn: U 0 = C E 4 hc = 197 Mev fm U 0 = 4 3 hc 4

RADIATION DAMPING TRANSVERSE OSCILLATIONS

Average energy loss and gain per turn Every turn electron radiates small amount of energy E 1 = E 0 U 0 = E 0 1 U 0 E 0 only the amplitude of the momentum changes P 1 = P 0 U 0 c = P 0 1 U 0 E 0 Only the longitudinal component of the momentum is increased in the RF cavity Energy of betatron oscillation E A 2 A 1 2 = A 0 2 1 U 0 E 0 or A 1 A 0 1 U 0 2E 0

Damping of vertical oscillations But this is just the exponential decay law! A A = U 0 2E The oscillations are exponentially damped with the damping time (milliseconds!) 2ET U 0 0 In terms of radiation power 2E P AA e t 0 the time it would take particle to lose all of its energy 4 and since P E E 3 1

Adiabatic damping in linear accelerators In a linear accelerator: p p In a storage ring beam passes many times through same RF cavity x = p p decreases E 1 p p Clean loss of energy every turn (no change in x ) Every turn is re-accelerated by RF (x is reduced) Particle energy on average remains constant

Emittance damping in linacs: W W 4 W 4 1 or 4 const.

RADIATION DAMPING LONGITUDINAL OSCILLATIONS

Longitudinal motion: compensating radiation loss U 0 RF cavity provides accelerating field with frequency h harmonic number V RF f RF h f 0 The energy gain: U 0 URF ev RF Synchronous particle: has design energy gains from the RF on the average as much as it loses per turn U 0

Longitudinal motion: phase stability U 0 V RF Particle ahead of synchronous one gets too much energy from the RF goes on a longer orbit (not enough B) >> takes longer to go around comes back to the RF cavity closer to synchronous part. Particle behind the synchronous one gets too little energy from the RF goes on a shorter orbit (too much B) catches-up with the synchronous particle

Longitudinal motion: energy-time oscillations energy deviation from the design energy, or the energy of the synchronous particle longitudinal coordinate measured from the position of the synchronous electron

Orbit Length Length element depends on x dl = 1 + x ds dl x ds Horizontal displacement has two parts: x = x + x To first order x does not change L x has the same sign around the ring Length of the off-energy orbit L = dl = 1 + x ds = L 0 +L L = D s s ds where = p p = E E L L =

Something funny happens on the way around the ring... Revolution time changes with energy T T = L L Particle goes faster (not much!) while the orbit length increases (more!) Ring is above transition energy isochronous ring: T 0 = L 0 c d = 1 2 dp p The slip factor since >> 1 2 T = 1 T 2 dp p = dp p = 0 or = tr 1 2 tr (relativity) L = dp L p

Not only accelerators work above transition Dante Aligieri Divine Comedy

RF Voltage V RF U 0 V Vˆ sin h 0 s here the synchronous phase s U arcsin 0 evˆ

Momentum compaction factor 1 L Like the tunes Q x, Q y - depends on the whole optics D s s ds A quick estimate for separated function guide field: = 1 L 0 0 mag D s ds L mag = 2 0 = 1 L 0 0 D L mag But = D R Since dispersion is approximately D R Q 2 1 typically < 1% 2 Q and the orbit change for ~ 1% energy deviation L = 1 4 10 L 2 Q = 0 in dipoles = elsewhere

Energy balance Energy gain from the RF system: U RF = ev RF = U 0 + ev RF synchronous particle () will get exactly the energy loss per turn we consider only linear oscillations Each turn electron gets energy from RF and loses energy to radiation within one revolution time T 0 = U 0 + ev RF U 0 + U V RF = dv RF d = 0 d dt = 1 T 0 ev RF U An electron with an energy deviation will arrive after one turn at a different time with respect to the synchronous particle d dt = E 0

Synchrotron oscillations: damped harmonic oscillator Combining the two equations where the oscillation frequency the damping is slow: the solution is then: t = 0 e t cos Wt + d 2 dt 2 + 2 d dt + W2 = 0 W 2 ev RF T 0 E 0 U 2T 0 typically <<W similarly, we can get for the time delay: t = 0 e t cos Wt +

Synchrotron (time - energy) oscillations The ratio of amplitudes at any instant Oscillations are 90 degrees out of phase = WE 0 = + 2 The motion can be viewed in the phase space of conjugate variables, ˆ E 0, W E 0 ˆ W

V Vo sin s s Stable regime U Separatrix d( ) dt Longitudinal Phase Space

Longitudinal motion: damping of synchrotron oscillations During one period of synchrotron oscillation: when the particle is in the upper half-plane, it loses more energy per turn, its energy gradually reduces U > U 0 U < U 0 when the particle is in the lower half-plane, it loses less energy per turn, but receives U 0 on the average, so its energy deviation gradually reduces The synchrotron motion is damped 2 B 2 the phase space trajectory is spiraling towards the origin P E

Robinson theorem: Damping partition numbers Transverse betatron oscillations are damped with Synchrotron oscillations are damped twice as fast x z 2ET U ET U 0 0 0 0 The total amount of damping (Robinson theorem) depends only on energy and loss per turn 1 x + 1 y + 1 = 2U 0 ET 0 = U 0 2ET 0 J x + J y + J the sum of the partition numbers J x + J z + J = 4

Radiation loss P E 2 B 2 Displaced off the design orbit particle sees fields that are different from design values energy deviation different energy: P different magnetic field B particle moves on a different orbit, defined by the off-energy or dispersion function D x γ E 2 both contribute to linear term in P γ betatron oscillations: zero on average

Radiation loss To first order in U rad = U 0 + U P E 2 B 2 electron energy changes slowly, at any instant it is moving on an orbit defined by D x after some algebra one can write U = U 0 2 + D E 0 U du rad de E0 D 0 only when k 0

Damping partition numbers J x + J z + J = 4 Typically we build rings with no vertical dispersion J 1 J 3 z Horizontal and energy partition numbers can be modified via D : J x J x 1D J 2 D Use of combined function magnets Shift the equilibrium orbit in quads with RF frequency

EQUILIBRIUM BEAM SIZES

Radiation effects in electron storage rings Average radiated power restored by RF Electron loses energy each turn RF cavities provide voltage to accelerate electrons back to the nominal energy Radiation damping Average rate of energy loss produces DAMPING of electron oscillations in all three degrees of freedom (if properly arranged!) Quantum fluctuations Statistical fluctuations in energy loss (from quantised emission of radiation) produce RANDOM EXCITATION of these oscillations Equilibrium distributions U 0 10 3 of E 0 V RF > U 0 The balance between the damping and the excitation of the electron oscillations determines the equilibrium distribution of particles in the beam

Quantum nature of synchrotron radiation Damping only If damping was the whole story, the beam emittance (size) would shrink to microscopic dimensions!* Lots of problems! (e.g. coherent radiation) How small? On the order of electron wavelength E =mc 2 = h = hc e = 1 mc h = C e C = 2.4 10 12 m Compton wavelength Diffraction limited electron emittance

Quantum nature of synchrotron radiation Quantum fluctuations Because the radiation is emitted in quanta, radiation itself takes care of the problem! It is sufficient to use quasi-classical picture:» Emission time is very short» Emission times are statistically independent (each emission - only a small change in electron energy) Purely stochastic (Poisson) process

Visible quantum effects I have always been somewhat amazed that a purely quantum effect can have gross macroscopic effects in large machines; and, even more, that Planck s constant has just the right magnitude needed to make practical the construction of large electron storage rings. A significantly larger or smaller value of would have posed serious -- perhaps insurmountable -- problems for the realization of large rings. Mathew Sands

Quantum excitation of energy oscillations Photons are emitted with typical energy at the rate (photons/second) Fluctuations in this rate excite oscillations During a small interval t electron emits photons u ph h typ = hc 3 N = P u ph N = N t losing energy of Actually, because of fluctuations, the number is resulting in spread in energy loss N u ph N N N u ph For large time intervals RF compensates the energy loss, providing damping towards the design energy E 0 Steady state: typical deviations from E 0 typical fluctuations in energy during a damping time

Equilibrium energy spread: rough estimate We then expect the rms energy spread to be and since E 0 P and P N u ph N u ph E 0 u ph geometric mean of the electron and photon energies! Relative energy spread can be written then as: e E e = m h 0 e c 4 10 13 m it is roughly constant for all rings typically E 2 E 0 ~ const ~ 10 3

Equilibrium energy spread More detailed calculations give for the case of an isomagnetic lattice s = 0 in dipoles elsewhere E 2 = C q E 2 J 0 with C q = 55 32 3 hc 6 2 3 = 1.468 m 10 m e c GeV 2 It is difficult to obtain energy spread < 0.1% limit on undulator brightness!

Equilibrium bunch length Bunch length is related to the energy spread Energy deviation and time of arrival (or position along the bunch) are conjugate variables (synchrotron oscillations) recall that W s V RF = W s E = W s E Two ways to obtain short bunches: RF voltage (power!) 1 V VRF RF Momentum compaction factor in the limit of = 0 isochronous ring: particle position along the bunch is frozen

Excitation of betatron oscillations x x x 0 x x x x x x E D x E D x E D x Courant Snyder invariant 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E D DD D x x x x

Excitation of betatron oscillations Electron emitting a photon at a place with non-zero dispersion starts a betatron oscillation around a new reference orbit x D E

Horizontal oscillations: equilibrium Emission of photons is a random process Again we have random walk, now in x. How far particle will wander away is limited by the radiation damping The balance is achieved on the time scale of the damping time x = 2 x N x D 2 E Typical horizontal beam size ~ 1 mm Quantum effect visible to the naked eye! Vertical size - determined by coupling D E

Beam emittance Betatron oscillations Particles in the beam execute betatron oscillations with different amplitudes. x Transverse beam distribution Gaussian (electrons) Typical particle: 1 - ellipse (in a place where = = 0) Emittance x 2 Units of x = x = / m rad Area = x x x = x x = x x

Equilibrium horizontal emittance Detailed calculations for isomagnetic lattice 2 x x0 = C qe 2 J x H mag where H = D 2 + 2DD + D 2 = 1 D 2 + D + D 2 and H mag is average value in the bending magnets

2-D Gaussian distribution Electron rings emittance definition 1 - ellipse x x n x dx = 1 2 e x 2 / 2 2 dx x x Area = x Probability to be inside 1- ellipse P 1 = 1 e 1 2 = 0.39 Probability to be inside n- ellipse P n = 1 e n 2 2

FODO cell lattice

Emittance FODO lattice emittance 100 H ~ D 2 ~ R Q 3 10 x0 C qe 2 J x R 1 Q 3 E2 J x 3 F FODO 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Phase advance per cell [degrees] 180

Ionization cooling p p absorber E acceleration similar to radiation damping, but there is multiple scattering in the absorber that blows up the emittance = 2 2 0 + MS 0 >> MS to minimize the blow up due to multiple scattering in the absorber we can focus the beam

Minimum emittance lattices C E 2 q 3 x0 θ Flatt J x F min = 1 12 15

Quantum limit on emittance Electron in a storage ring s dipole fields is accelerated, interacts with vacuum fluctuations: «accelerated thermometers show increased temperature» synchrotron radiation opening angle is ~ 1/-> a lower limit on equilibrium vertical emittance independent of energy G(s) =curvature, C q = 0.384 pm in case of SLS: 0.2 pm isomagnetic lattice y 0.09 pm y Mag

Polarisation Synchrotron radiation observed in the plane of the particle orbit is horizontally polarized, i.e. the electric field vector is horizontal Observed out of the horizontal plane, the radiation is elliptically polarized E E

Polarisation: spectral distribution x S x S P x S P d dp c tot c tot x S S 8 7 S S 8 1 3:1

Angular divergence of radiation at the critical frequency well below 0. 2 c well above 2 c

Seeing the electron beam (SLS) Making an image of the electron beam using the vertically polarised synchrotron light

Seeing the electron beam (SLS) X rays visible light, vertically polarised x ~ 55m

Vertical emittance record Beam size 3.6 0.6 m Emittance 0.9 0.4 pm SLS beam cross section compared to a human hair: 80 m 4 m

Summary of radiation integrals Momentum compaction factor I 1 = D ds = I 1 2R Energy loss per turn U 0 = 1 2 C E 4 I 2 I 2 = I 3 = ds 2 ds 3 I 4 = D 2k + 1 2 ds I 5 = H 3 ds C = 4 3 r e 5 m e c 2 3 = 8.858 m 10 GeV 3

Summary of radiation integrals (2) Damping parameter Damping times, partition numbers Equilibrium emittance x0 = 2 x =C qe 2 I 5 J x D = I 4 I 2 J = 2 + D, J x = 1 D, J y = 1 0 = 2ET 0 i = 0 J i Equilibrium energy spread 2 C = q E 2 I 3 E J I 2 I 2 U 0 C q = 55 32 3 I 1 = I 2 = I 3 = D ds ds 2 ds 3 I 4 = D 2k + 1 2 ds I 5 = H 3 hc 6 2 3 = 1.468 m 10 m e c H = D 2 + 2DD + D 2 ds GeV 2

Damping wigglers Increase the radiation loss per turn U 0 with WIGGLERS reduce damping time emittance control P E P wig wigglers at high dispersion: blow-up emittance e.g. storage ring colliders for high energy physics wigglers at zero dispersion: decrease emittance e.g. damping rings for linear colliders e.g. synchrotron light sources (PETRAIII, 1 nm.rad)

END