Problem Set #4: 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 (Due Monday Nov. 18th) f = m i a (4.1) f = m g Φ (4.2) a = Φ. (4.4)

Similar documents
Gravitation: Gravitation

Lecture: General Theory of Relativity

Chapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance

Chapter 2 General Relativity and Black Holes

The principle of equivalence and its consequences.

Curved spacetime and general covariance

Curved Spacetime III Einstein's field equations

A5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 2. General Relativity

Curved Spacetime I. Dr. Naylor

Week 9: Einstein s field equations

GRAVITATION F10. Lecture Maxwell s Equations in Curved Space-Time 1.1. Recall that Maxwell equations in Lorentz covariant form are.

matter The second term vanishes upon using the equations of motion of the matter field, then the remaining term can be rewritten

A873: Cosmology Course Notes. II. General Relativity

Übungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.

Curved Spacetime... A brief introduction

Schwarzschild Solution to Einstein s General Relativity

GENERAL RELATIVITY: THE FIELD THEORY APPROACH

Notes on General Relativity Linearized Gravity and Gravitational waves

General Relativity and Differential

General Relativity (j µ and T µν for point particles) van Nieuwenhuizen, Spring 2018

Variational Principle and Einstein s equations

Einstein Toolkit Workshop. Joshua Faber Apr

Delta-gravity. Jorge Alfaro Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Segundo Encuentro CosmoConce Concepción, March 16, Motivation...

Properties of Traversable Wormholes in Spacetime

Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic

The Divergence Myth in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity. William O. Straub Pasadena, California November 11, 2016

Einstein s Theory of Gravity. December 13, 2017

Quantum Field Theory Notes. Ryan D. Reece

Review of General Relativity

2 Post-Keplerian Timing Parameters for General Relativity

16. Einstein and General Relativistic Spacetimes

General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam

κ = f (r 0 ) k µ µ k ν = κk ν (5)

Gravitation: Tensor Calculus

Light Propagation in the Averaged Universe. arxiv:

2.1 Basics of the Relativistic Cosmology: Global Geometry and the Dynamics of the Universe Part I

PAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Equivalence Principles

Longitudinal Waves in Scalar, Three-Vector Gravity

JHEP11(2013)135. Mimetic dark matter. Ali H. Chamseddine a,b and Viatcheslav Mukhanov c,d,e

Lecture VIII: Linearized gravity

Tutorial I General Relativity

CHAPTER 6 EINSTEIN EQUATIONS. 6.1 The energy-momentum tensor

General Relativity. on the frame of reference!

Classical Field Theory

Astr 2320 Tues. May 2, 2017 Today s Topics Chapter 23: Cosmology: The Big Bang and Beyond Introduction Newtonian Cosmology Solutions to Einstein s

VACUUM POLARIZATION AND HAWKING RADIATION. SHOHREH RAHMATI Bachelor of Science, Shahid Beheshti University, 2007

Inequivalence of First and Second Order Formulations in D=2 Gravity Models 1

Connections and geodesics in the space of metrics The exponential parametrization from a geometric perspective

5.5 Energy-momentum tensor

General Relativity Lecture 20

Chapter 4. COSMOLOGICAL PERTURBATION THEORY

General Relativity ASTR 2110 Sarazin. Einstein s Equation

Law of Gravity and Gravitational Radiation

A brief introduction to modified theories of gravity

Cosmology (Cont.) Lecture 19

Kinetic screening of fields and stability of NEC violating configurations

General Relativity (225A) Fall 2013 Assignment 8 Solutions

= (length of P) 2, (1.1)

General Relativistic N-body Simulations of Cosmic Large-Scale Structure. Julian Adamek

Write your CANDIDATE NUMBER clearly on each of the THREE answer books provided. Hand in THREE answer books even if they have not all been used.

Orbital Motion in Schwarzschild Geometry

The Stability of the Irrotational Euler-Einstein System with a Positive Cosmological Constant

? Can we formulate General Relativity in a Lagrangian picture?

Diffusive DE & DM. David Benisty Eduardo Guendelman

Brane in the Relativistic Theory of Gravitation

Geometry of the Universe: Cosmological Principle

Problem Set #1: 1.1, 1.3, 1.7, 1.10, 1.13 (Due Monday Sept. 23rd)

HOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes

arxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013

Gravitational collapse and the vacuum energy

Gravity and action at a distance

Problem Sets on Cosmology and Cosmic Microwave Background

A Curvature Primer. With Applications to Cosmology. Physics , General Relativity

From Gravitation Theories to a Theory of Gravitation

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.ed-ph] 21 Aug 1999

arxiv: v1 [physics.gen-ph] 18 Mar 2010

Fundamental Theories of Physics in Flat and Curved Space-Time

Imperial College 4th Year Physics UG, General Relativity Revision lecture. Toby Wiseman; Huxley 507,

Gauge Theory of Gravitation: Electro-Gravity Mixing

A solution in Weyl gravity with planar symmetry

Overthrows a basic assumption of classical physics - that lengths and time intervals are absolute quantities, i.e., the same for all observes.

Curved spacetime tells matter how to move

Effect of the Trace Anomaly on the Cosmological Constant. Jurjen F. Koksma

PAPER 52 GENERAL RELATIVITY

Gravitation: Cosmology

Third Year: General Relativity and Cosmology. 1 Problem Sheet 1 - Newtonian Gravity and the Equivalence Principle

Do You Need to Understand General Relativity to Understand Gravitation?

A A + B. ra + A + 1. We now want to solve the Einstein equations in the following cases:

and Zoran Rakić Nonlocal modified gravity Ivan Dimitrijević, Branko Dragovich, Jelena Grujić

Lorentz Transformations and Special Relativity

arxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 11 Sep 2014

An introduction to gravitational waves. Enrico Barausse (Institut d'astrophysique de Paris/CNRS, France)

BLACK HOLES (ADVANCED GENERAL RELATIV- ITY)

Lecture Notes for General Relativity Fall 2010

Introduction to General Relativity

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Physics Department Physics 8.286: The Early Universe October 27, 2013 Prof. Alan Guth PROBLEM SET 6

Gravitation: Special Relativity

MATH 423 January 2011

Transcription:

Chapter 4 Gravitation Problem Set #4: 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 (Due Monday Nov. 18th) 4.1 Equivalence Principle The Newton s second law states that f = m i a (4.1) where m i is the inertial mass. The Newton s law of gravity states that f = m g Φ (4.2) where m g is the gravitational mass. The Weak Equivalence Principle states that m i = m g. (4.3) This means that for a freely falling particle the effect of the gravitational field is independent on its mass a = Φ. (4.4) This also means that by preforming local experiments it is impossible to distinguish the gravitational field from being in a uniformly accelerated reference frame. Of course all this was known long before Einstein, but what was newis the Special Theory of Relativity which can be included in the Einstein Equivalence Principle: Inasmallenoughregionofspace-time, the laws of physics reduce to those of special relativity; it is impossible to 54

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 55 detect the existence of a gravitational field. An immediate and celebrated prediction of the Einstein Equivalence Principle is the gravitational redshift. Consider two observers at a distance z from each other moving with acceleration a so that the distance remains fixed. One observer emits a photon and it reaches the other observer after a time By that time the velocity of both boxes changed by t = z c. (4.5) v = a t = a z c (4.6) and due to non-relativistic Doppler effect the wavelength will be shifted by λ λ 0 = v c = az c 2. (4.7) According to the Einstein Equivalence Principle this effect should be indistinguishable when the acceleration is due to gravity, then the photon emitted from the ground should be shifted by λ λ and in terms of Newtonian potential λ = 1 Φdt = λ c = 1 c 2 z Φdz = = a gz c 2. (4.8) = Φ c 2. (4.9) This was checked experimentally by Pound and Rebka in 1960. Einstein Equivalence Principle also suggests that the gravitational field acts universally on massive and as we have seen on massless particles. This means that there are no gravitationally neutral objects with respect to which one can measure acceleration and, thus, the acceleration due to gravity is ill defined. (As we shall see even the gravitational mass of extended objects is also ill defined.) Therefore, to satisfy the principle we shall give up on the idea of extending inertial frames of Special Relativity throughout the entire space-time or otherwise the far away objects would accelerate in such

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 56 frames. Of course we can still keep the notion of the local inertial frames where by local we mean a sufficiently small region of space-time volume. Thus it seems necessary (and as we will see also sufficient) to incorporate the ideas of differential geometry into the laws of gravitation. Evidently, the local inertial frames are nothing but local normal coordinates for which the Christoffel symbols vanish locally and all of the laws of Spatial Relativity are maintained; and the impossibility to define acceleration ofthefaraway objects is due to the fact that the parallel transport of vectors depends on the path for a curved space-time with non-vanishing Riemann tensor. In the normal coordinates a freely falling observer moves without acceleration d 2 x µ =0. (4.10) dλ2 This equation can be made covariant (or independent on coordinates) with help of Christoffel symbols d 2 x µ dλ 2 dx dx σ +Γµ σ dλ dλ =0. (4.11) which is just the geodesics equation that tells that the freely falling particle move along geodesics. We shall now check that (4.11) reducestothenewton slawofgravity (4.2) inthelimitof: small velocities dx i dτ dx0 dτ where τ is proper time and thus from (4.11) (4.12) d 2 x µ dx 0 dx 0 dτ 2 +Γµ 00 dτ dτ 0. (4.13) slowly changing metric and thus 0 g µν i g σ (4.14) Γ µ 00 = 1 2 gµλ ( 0 g λ0 + 0 g 0λ λ g 00 ) 1 2 gµλ λ g 00. (4.15) weak gravitational field g µν = η µν + h µν (4.16)

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 57 where the perturbation h µν 1 (4.17) and thus from (4.16) and(4.14) Γ µ 00 1 2 ηµi i h 00. (4.18) From (4.13) and(4.18) whose µ =0component or and µ = i component d 2 x µ dτ 2 1 2 ηµi i h 00 dx 0 dτ ( ) dx 0 2 (4.19) dτ d 2 x 0 dτ 2 0 (4.20) const. (4.21) ( ) 2 dτ d 2 x i dx 0 dτ 1 2 2 ih 00 (4.22) or by setting t = x 0, d 2 x i dt 1 2 2 ih 00. (4.23) Note that (4.23) isthesameas(4.4) with or h 00 = 2Φ (4.24) g 00 = (1 + 2Φ). (4.25) Similarly one can adopt all of the laws of physics to respect the Einstein Equivalence Principle. This usually involves starting with normalcoordinates where the laws of physics are known and rewriting them in a covariant form it in terms of legitimate tensors (e.g. partial derivative are replaced by covariant etc.).

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 58 4.2 Einstein Equations As was previously stated we want to derive a dynamical equation for the metric tensor which generalizes the Poisson equation where 2 = δ ij i j and is the mass density. Since we combine (4.24) and(4.26) into 2 Φ=4πG (4.26) T 00 = (4.27) 2 h 00 = 8πGT 00. (4.28) Of course, the next step should be to make this equations tensorial. The first obvious choice λ λ g µν T µν (4.29) is not going to work just because the left hand side is identically zero since λ g µν =0.Thesecondchoice R µν T µν (4.30) is a lot more reasonable, but does not work either just because theenergy and momentum conservations imply but µ T µν =0 (4.31) µ R µν 0 (4.32) for general space-times. An important exception is a vacuum Einstein equation for vanishing energy momentum tensor R µν = T µν =0. (4.33) There is however a geometric object the Einstein tensor G µν = R µν 1 2 Rg µν (4.34) with the right properties on arbitrary spaces. It is a symmetric (0, 2) tensor built of the second (and first and zeroth) derivatives of the metric and µ G µν =0. (4.35)

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 59 Thus we can conjecture that G µν = R µν 1 2 Rg µν =8πGT µν (4.36) where the proportionality constant was determined from (4.28). This is the Einstein equation which is a rather complicated second-order non-linear equation with very few explicit solutions. The equation actually contains 10 coupled differential equation since both sides are symmetric (0, 2) tensors which is exactly the number of unknown parameters in ametricg µν. But because of the general covariance 4 of the 10 equations are unphysical (represented by four function x µ (x µ ))andweareleftwithonly6 physical (or coordinate independent) degrees of freedom. This agreeswiththenumber of dynamical equations in (4.36) whentheconstraintsduetoconservationof the energy and momentum (4.31) orthebianchiidentity(4.35) istakeninto account. The Einstein equation can also be derived using variational principle for the Hilbert action S H = d 4 x gr. (4.37) To obtain the Einstein equations with lower indices we will vary with respect to the inverse metric. Since R = g µν R µν (4.38) the variation of the acton will have three contributions: δs H = d 4 x ( gg µν δr µν + gr µν δg µν + Rδ g ). (4.39) But the first term is given by δr µλν = δ ( λ Γ µν νγ µλ +Γ λσ Γσ µν Γ νσ µλ) Γσ = ( ) ( ) = λ δγ µν ν δγ µλ + δγ λσ Γσ µν +Γ λσ δγσ µν δγ νσ Γσ µλ Γ νσ δγσ µλ = = [ ( ) λ δγ µν +Γ ] λσ δγσ µν Γ σ λµδγ σν Γ σ λνδγ µσ [ ( ν δγ µλ) +Γ νσ δγ σ µλ Γσ νµ δγ σλ Γσ νλ µσ] δγ = ( ) ( = λ δγ µν ν δγ ) µλ (4.40) Note that unlike Γ µν its variation δγ µν is a tensor as can be seen from the

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 60 transformation law (3.6). Thus, d 4 x ( ) gg µν δr µν = d 4 x g ( ( ) ( )) g µν λ δγ λ µν g µν ν δγ λ µλ = = d 4 x g ( ( ( λ g µν δγµν) λ λ g µλ δγµν)) ν = = d 4 x ( g λ g µν δγ λ µν gµλ δγµν) ν =0 (4.41) is a boundary term which is set to zero by making the variations vanishat the boundary of space-time. Now the third term in (4.39) canbesimplifiedusingthefollowinguseful identity Tr(log (M)) = log (det (M)) (4.42) or Applying it to inverse metric gives us Tr ( M 1 δm ) = δ (det (M)) det (M) (4.43) M µν = g µν (4.44) Tr ( g µν δg νλ) = δ (g 1 ) g 1 g µν δg µν = g 1 δg. (4.45) δ g = 1 δg = 1 2 g 2 and by substituting in (4.39) weget δs H = d 4 x g ( g) g µν δg µν g = 1 2 ggµν δg µν (4.46) ( R µν 1 ) 2 Rg µν δg µν. (4.47) Therefore for the action to vanish for arbitrary variations of the metric the vacuum Einstein equations must be satisfied 1 δs =0 (4.48) g δg µν G µν = R µν 1 2 Rg µν =0. (4.49)

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 61 4.3 Energy-Momentum Tensor To obtain a non-vacuum equation on should also include matterlagrangian, S = 1 d 4 x gr.+ d 4 x g L M, (4.50) 16πG and the variational principle implies δs δg = 1 d 4 x g µν 16πG ( R µν 1 2 Rg µν For this to agree with Einstein equation ) + d 4 x g ( 1 δ ( ) gl M ) =0. g δg µν R µν 1 2 Rg µν =8πGT µν we define the energy momentum tensor as T µν = 2 1 δl M. (4.51) g δg µν For example, action for a scalar field ( S φ = dx 4 g 1 ) 2 gµν µ φ ν φ V (φ) (4.52) can be varied δs φ = dx [ 4 g 1 ( 2 µφ ν φ (δg µν )+ 1 ) 2 gµν µ φ ν φ V (φ) δ ( g )] = = dx [ 4 g 1 ( 2 µφ ν φ + 1 )( 2 gλ λ φ φ V (φ) 1 )] ggµν δg µν = 2 = dx 4 [ g 1 2 µφ ν φ + 1 4 g µνg λ λ φ φ + 1 ] 2 V (φ)g µν δg µν (4.53) which leads to the following energy momentum tensor T µν = 2 1 g δs δg µν = µφ ν φ 1 2 g µνg λ λ φ φ V (φ)g µν. (4.54) Note that the non-vacuum Einstein equation can be solved for an arbitrary manifold. Just specify the metric, calculate the Einstein tensor and demand that it is proportional to the energy momentum tensor. Of course, this does not tell us what should be the field content of the theory and

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 62 whether the corresponding energy momentum tensor is realistic. Thus, it is useful to have some restrictions on T µν. Weak Energy Condition: for all time-like vectors t µ. Null Energy Condition: for all light-like vectors l µ. Dominant Energy Condition: T µν t µ t ν 0 T µν l µ l ν 0 T µν t µ t ν 0 for all time-like t µ and time-like or light-like T µν t µ. Strong Energy Condition: T µν t µ t ν 1 2 T λ λt σ t σ 0 for all time-like vectors t µ.thisconditionisusedtoprovefamoussingularity theorems, but is also violated in quantum systems, for example, subject to Casimir force. For a perfect fluid T µν =( + p)u µ U ν + pg µν where is the energy density, p is pressure and U µ is the four velocity. weak energy conditions implies 0 and + p 0, null energy condition implies + p 0, dominant energy condition implies p, and strong energy condition implies +3p 0 and + p 0. Consider time evolution of a small ball of small particles moving with four velocities U µ.thentheexpansion, rotation and shear of the ball can be defined as θ = λ U λ. (4.55) ω µν = [ν U µ] (4.56)

CHAPTER 4. GRAVITATION 63 σ µν = (ν U µ) 1 3 λu λ (g µν + U µ U ν ). (4.57) and the famous Raychaudhuri equation describes the time evolution of the expansion parameter, dθ dτ = 1 3 θ2 σ µν σ µν + ω µν ω µν R µν U µ U ν. (4.58) If the ball of particles is at rest U =(1, 0, 0, 0) with respect to a locally inertial system g µν = η µν and has vanishing expansion θ =0,rotationω =0 and shear σ =0,thentheRaychaudhuriandEinsteinequationsgive ( dθ dτ = R 00 = 8πG T 00 1 ) 2 Tg 00 = 4πG (T 00 + T 11 + T 22 + T 33 ) where we used the fact that (4.59) R = 8πGT. (4.60) If we denote T 00 =, T 11 = p x, T 22 = p y, T 33 = p z then, dθ dτ = 4πG ( + p x + p y + p z ). (4.61) Note that the gravity would tend to decrease the size of the ball if +3p 0. Thus, for a perfect fluid the strong energy condition implies that the gravity is attractive.