STEUBEN COUNTY, NEW YORK. Hazard Analysis Report

Similar documents
IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Hazard Vulnerability Analysis Union County

5.2. IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

RISK ASSESSMENT COMMUNITY PROFILE NATURAL HAZARDS COMMUNITY RISK PROFILES. Page 13 of 524

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Table C.17 Disaster Declarations or Proclamations Affecting Perry County Presidential & Gubernatorial

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

4.1 Hazard Identification: Natural Hazards

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

SECTION 4 - RISK ASSESSMENT

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

Assessing Hazards and Risk

Bossier Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 10, 2016 Bossier City, LA

Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission #

History of Natural and Man-Made Disaster within the Region. There have been two aircraft accident resulting in casualties within the past 50 years.

RISK ASSESSMENT IDENTIFYING HAZARDS

W I N T E R STORM HAZARD DESCRIPTION

Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D., Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission #

Geologic Hazards. Montour County Multi-jurisdictional. General. Earthquake

Chippewa County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan

2014 Russell County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update STAKEHOLDERS AND TECHNICAL ADVISORS MEETING 2/6/14

The Richter Scale. Micro Less than 2.0 Microearthquakes, not felt. About 8,000/day

Severe Weather Watches, Advisories & Warnings

Table G - 6. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Kent ( ) (From Wilkin County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

2014 Annual Mitigation Plan Review Meeting

Kentucky Weather Hazards: What is Your Risk?

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF HAZARDS OF CONCERN

They include earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods, landslides, and other processes and occurrences. They are included in the broader concept of.

WINTER STORM Annex II

West Carroll Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 25, 2015 Oak Grove, LA

CITY OF TUSCALOOSA ORGANIZATION OF 2015 FMP FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN

On Page 1, following Paragraph 2 of the Planning Participants subsection, insert the following: 2012 Committee members included:

5.2 IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

May 31, Flood Response Overview

HAZARD DESCRIPTION... 1 LOCATION... 1 EXTENT... 1 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCES...

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Severe Storms November 1994 January 1996 August 1998 and May 2000 March 2002 May 2002 Champaign County

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION... 1 HAZARD EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE... 2 OVERVIEW OF HAZARD ANALYSIS... 4 BUILDING VALUES... 5 POTENTIAL DOLLAR LOSSES...

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. Table C.10 The Richter Scale. Descriptor Richter Magnitude Earthquake Effects

Natural Disasters & Assessing Hazards and Risk. Natural Hazards and Natural Disasters

Miami-Dade County Overview

Complete Weather Intelligence for Public Safety from DTN

4.4 Assessing Vulnerability: Estimating Potential Losses

Section 12. Winter Storms

3.1: Identifying Hazards. Introduction

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (HVA)

West Baton Rouge Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 9, 2015 Port Allen, LA

KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RISK ASSESSMENT

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan

ICE STORM! a mini tabletop exercise for home care agencies

Catastrophic Events Impact on Ecosystems

Jim Fox. copyright UNC Asheville's NEMAC

Running Head: HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN OUTLINE FOR MISSISSIPPI 1

Baldwin County, Alabama

United States Multi-Hazard Early Warning System

TILLAMOOK COUNTY HAZARD ANALYSIS

A Presentation By: Dr. G. M. Dar Centre for Disaster Management & Env. Studies, J&K IMPA, Srinagar

Disaster RISK Management : Bhutanese Scenario

SPEARFISH FIRE DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Best Practices Natural Disasters Action Plan

Natural Disasters. in Florida. Severe Thunderstorms

Extreme Weather Events: Infrastructure Damage and Impact on Vulnerable Populations

Table-Top Exercise for Emergency Preparedness Evaluation: Little Anse, Isle Madame

Emergency Preparedness Questions

Key Takeaways: - Rain: Coastal NC: ; isolated totals to 40 Central, Western, & Northeastern NC: 5-10 ; isolated totals to 20

A Preliminary Severe Winter Storms Climatology for Missouri from

Lesson 8. Natural Disasters

State of Georgia Snow and Ice Plan

Local Area Emergency (LAE)

What Are Disasters? The Rescue Kids Trio!

Wind Events. Flooding Events. T-Storm Events. Awareness Alerts / Potential Alerts / Action Alerts / Immediate Action Alerts / Emergency Alerts.

Flooding in Western North Carolina: Some Spatial, Hydrologic, and Seasonal Characteristics CAUTION!! Outline. Basic Flood Facts.

CITY OF NEW LONDON WINTER ROAD & SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE POLICY

A GEOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF MAJOR DISASTER DECLARATIONS ACROSS THE LOWER 48 STATES

FLOOD/SCS EVENT, APRIL 28 MAY 4

Initiative. Country Risk Profile: papua new guinea. Better Risk Information for Smarter Investments PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

Flood Scenario Worksheet

Unit 4. This unit will enable you to improve coordination and communication with State and local agencies when hazardous weather threatens.

Daily Operations Briefing Monday, February 13, :30 a.m. EST

Understanding Weather and Climate Risk. Matthew Perry Sharing an Uncertain World Conference The Geological Society, 13 July 2017

Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

Natural Processes. Were you prepared for the fast approaching storm? Were you able to take shelter? What about pets, livestock or plants?

SCHOOL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR NATURAL DISASTERS

Daily Operations Briefing. Saturday, May 13, :30 a.m. EDT

Page G Crow Wing County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2017

Advisory Committee Meeting December 5, 2012

How advances in atmospheric modelling are used for improved flood forecasting. Dr Michaela Bray Cardiff University

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

GC Briefing. Weather Sentinel Hurricane Florence. Status at 5 PM EDT (21 UTC) Today (NHC) Discussion. September 13, 2018

Daily Operations Briefing. Friday, May 5, :30 a.m. EDT

Hazardous Weather and Flooding Preparedness. Hazardous Weather and Flooding Preparedness

City of Punta Gorda Community Emergency Management Plan 2013

NC Emergency Management A View from the Counties

APPENDIX D: Hazard Summary Matrices

Wednesday, May 30, :30 a.m. EDT

USING 3D GIS TO ASSESS ENVIRONMENTAL FLOOD HAZARDS IN MINA

Town and Village of Arcade Hazard Mitigation Plan Update:

Daily Operations Briefing Wednesday, April 5, :30 a.m. EDT

Oregon APA Legal Issues Workshop December 7, Tricia Sears, DLCD With information from Bill Burns, DOGAMI

EARLY WARNING IN SOUTHERN AFRICA:

FLOODING. Flood any relatively high stream flow overtopping the natural or artificial banks in a water system.

Transcription:

STEUBEN COUNTY, NEW YORK Hazard Analysis Report Prepared by: April 1, 2014

Background On April 1, 2014 the Steuben County Office of Emergency Management conducted a hazard analysis using the automated program, HAZNY (Hazards New York). HAZNY was developed by the American Red Cross and the New York State Emergency Management Office. The results of this hazard analysis are presented in this report. HAZNY and Steuben County HAZNY is an automated interactive spreadsheet that asks specific questions on potential hazards in a community and records and evaluates the responses to these questions. HAZNY also includes historical and expert data on selected hazards. HAZNY is designed specifically for groups, rather than individual use. Steuben County assembled a group of representatives from various County, State, and Local agency officials to consider and discuss the questions and issues raised by the HAZNY program. New York State Emergency Management Office facilitated the meeting and recorded the results. The Results The Group analyzed hazards potentially affecting Steuben County and its local jurisdictions. HAZNY rated each hazard based on the Group's assessment and assigned a numerical value. These values are categorized as follows: 321 to 400 HIGH HAZARD 241 to 320 MODERATELY HIGH HAZARD 161 to 240 MODERATELY LOW HAZARD 44 to 160 LOW HAZARD The Group rated the following 18 hazards: Hazard Rating FLOOD 338 HAZMAT TRANSIT 316 WILDFIRE 296 TORNADO 293 UTILITY FAILURE 291 SEVERE STORMS 268 FIRE 265 TRANS ACCIDENT 260 WINTER STORM (SEVERE) 246

DAM FAILURE 245 LANDSLIDE 236 EXTREME TEMPS 232 CIVIL UNREST 228 ICE STORM 197 RADIOLOGICAL (TRANSIT 186 HAZMAT (FIXED SITE) 176 EPIDEMIC 164 RADIOLOGICAL (FIXED SITE) 117 All other hazards listed in the Hazny program were deem by the group to be in the Low Hazard catagory and therefore were not rated. Those hazards are: Air Contamination Avalanche Blight Drought Earthquake Explosion (Considered under Fire) Food Shortage Fuel Shortage Hurricane (Considered under Flooding for Inland Flooding) Ice Jams (Considered under Flooding) Infestation Mine Collapse Oil Spill (Considered under Haz Mat) Structural Collapse Terrorism Tsunami-Wave Action Water Supply Contamination (Considered under Utility Failure)

High Hazards Hazard(s) rated as high: FLOOD Flash Flood and River Flood was determined to be a High Hazard. The Group determined that flooding is likely to continue as a frequent event, occurring more than once a year. Steuben County has had twelve Federally declared flooding disasters between 1972 and this assessment. Although mitigation actions, such as channel clean up has proven positive throughout the county, the potential for additional flooding continues to be a high threat for the county. Flooding would be expected to cover a large region, and would likely cause cascade effects, such as landslides, power failures, traffic accidents and hazardous chemicals releases. Several hours warning is expected with flooding starting in the western part of the county (Hornell area) and then continuing toward the east (Corning area). It was determined by those involved in the county health care system that serious injury or death is likely but not in large numbers. This may tax the local healthcare system but not overloading the system in a worse case event. In a flood similar to that caused by Tropical Storm Agnes in 1972, severe damage to both private property and public structures could be expected, including extreme damage to crops during the growing season. Emergency operations would likely continue for more than two weeks following a worst case flood event. FLOOD: 338, High Hazard Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: A Frequent Event Several Hours Warning Hazard Duration: Two to Three Days Recovery Time: More Than Two Weeks Severe Damage to Private Property Severe Structural Damage to Public Facilities MODERATELY HIGH HAZARDS Hazard(s) rated as moderately high include: HAZMAT TRANSIT, WILDFIRE, TORNADO, UTILITY FAILURE, SEVERE STORMS, FIRE, TRANS ACCIDENT, WINTER STORM (SEVERE), DAM FAILURE HAZMAT TRANSIT: 316, Moderately High Hazard Hazardous Materials in Transit, rated at 316, based upon the fact that Hazardous Materials accidents in transit are frequent events occurring more than once a year on average. Steuben County has an East/West Interstate as well as a rail line, which runs through the County and carries a significant

amount of hazardous material traffic. An accident can occur anywhere within this large region of the County. The worst case scenario would be a release occurring without warning, and cause serious injury or death, but not in large numbers, which could potentially overtax the local EMS system if the event occurs within proximity to populated areas, such as the City of Corning, Hornell or one of the thirteen other incorporated Villages. The plume resulting from a worst case event on a major highway or rail line could be expected to cover a small region. The group determined that a large incident involving railcars might take four days to one week to stabilize and three days to one week in recovery time. This evaluation did not take into consideration the extended period of environmental clean up that could be associated with such an incident. Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: A Frequent Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Four days to One Week Recovery Time: Three Days to One Week Moderate Damage to Private Property Moderate Structural Damage to Public Facilities WILDFIRE: 296, Moderately High Hazard Wildfire, rated at 296, is defined as an uncontrollable combustion of trees, brush, or grass involving a substantial land area which may have the potential for threatening human life and property. Wildfires are a frequent event in the county, occurring more than once a year. Usually these fires occur during the spring and late fall. Wildfires are also a potential threat because there are large regions of the county covered by forestland. Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: A Frequent Event No Warning Hazard Duration: One Day Recovery Time: One to Two Days Serious Injury or Death Unlikely Severe Damage to Private Property

TORNADO: 293, Moderately High Hazard Tornado, rated at 293, can occur anywhere within the County. The National Weather Service reports that between 1996 and 2013 there have been six confirmed tornadoes in Steuben County ranging from F0-F1. The committee has listed this a regular event occurring between once a year and once every seven year. The main reason for this, is that over the past few years Steuben County has had several confirmed tornados. The committee determined that a worst case event, an F2 or F3 located in a residential area, could cause moderate damage to private and public property, with the likelihood of triggering additional hazards, such as power failures, fires, and structural collapse. Based on past experience, the committee determined that there would not be any warning of an impending tornado. Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: A Regular Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Less Than One Day Recovery Time: Three Days to One Week Severe Damage to Private Property Severe Structural Damage to Public Facilities UTILITY FAILURE: 291, Moderately High Hazard Utility Failure, rated at 291, is described as an regular event by the committee, based on Steuben County s rural area, power is often lost several times throughout the year but not for large periods of time. The potential for a utility failure could cover a large region in a worst case event and could last four days to one week. It was determined that credible worst case scenario could impact those in the population who rely on electrically operated lifesaving devices, secondarily the elderly if the failure occurs during the winter heating season and lasted more than several hours. Serious injuries or death is unlikely and the committee felt that there is potential for cascading effects. Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: A Regular Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Four days to One Week Recovery Time: One to Two Days Moderate Damage to Private Property Severe Structural Damage to Public Facilities

SEVERE STORMS: 268, Moderately High Hazard Severe Storms was rated 268 because it would impact a large region and was listed as highly likely to cause cascade effects, such as power outages and traffic accidents. Storms that produce winds with speeds in excess of 60 miles per hour are a frequent event, according to the National Weather Service, occurring on average more than thirteen times per year in Steuben County. A major effect of these storms is the onset with limited to no warning. Although the committee felt in the worst case scenario there would be injuries or death to small numbers, the most vulnerable event would occur during one of the county s numerous outdoor events. Damage would be moderate to both public and private infrastructure. Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: A Frequent Event Several Hours Warning Hazard Duration: Less Than One Day Recovery Time: One to Two Days Moderate Damage to Private Property Moderate Structural Damage to Public Facilities FIRE: 265, Moderately High Hazard Fire, was described as a frequent event occurring more than once a year and was rated at 265. Fires requiring the activation of multiple county agencies occur more than once a year but usually not on a severe level. The committee felt that there is a potential in any given year to have a severe event occur. A credible worse case event could occur anywhere within the County involving a large manufacturing facility, residential apartment complex, or critical facility could cause severe damage to private property and potential injury or death but not in large numbers. It was also considered by the committee that many municipalities in the County have older historic Business Districts, which also house apartments on the upper levels. A fire in one of these occupancies could cause serious injury or death to residents, and cause economic hardships to the involved community. Potential Several Locations Cascade Effects: Some Potential Frequency: A Frequent Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Less Than One Day Recovery Time: Less Than One Day Severe Damage to Private Property

TRANS ACCIDENT: 260, Moderately High Hazard Transportation Accident, rated at 260. This hazard includes highway, rail, air, and marine vehicle accidents with mass casualties. The presence of two major highways, Interstate 390 and 86, span the entire length of the County, and adds to the potential for serious highway accidents. Although most areas of the county see frequent motor vehicle accidents the committee described transportation accidents using substantial mutual aid as a regular event, occurring between once a year and every seven years. It was believed that a credible worst case event would result in serious injury or death to extremely large numbers of people with the potential to overwhelm the local hospital and EMS system. The majority of the County s EMS response personnel are comprised of volunteer agencies that would become severely taxed during an Mass Casualty Incident. In addition, the potential threat is increased when considering the close proximity to the Elmira/Corning Regional Airport and the approach paths. Several Steuben County Communities fall within these flight paths. Adding to the problem was the determination that an accident could occur without warning anywhere within the region. Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: A Regular Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Less Than One Day Recovery Time: Three Days to One Week Serious Injury or Death to Large Numbers Little or No Damage to Private Property WINTER STORM (SEVERE): 246, Moderately High Hazard Winter Storm is defined as a storm system that occurs during the winter months which deposits a wintry mix of precipitation such as snow, sleet, or freezing rain, with significant impact on transportation systems and public safety. The committee rated winter storms at 246 primarily because it is identified by the National Weather Service as a frequent event, occurring more than once a year. The committee felt that winter storms have the potential to affect the entire county or at least a large region of the county. Cascading effect such as power outages, downed trees and power lines and widespread traffic accidents are highly likely. Effect on the general public was considered to be moderate with death or serious injury is likely but not to large numbers of the population. Although the storm may only last about a day, it could take municipalities an additional one to two days to recover from the effects of a worst case scenario storm. Potential Cascade Effects: Frequency: Hazard Duration: Recovery Time: Throughout a Large Region Highly Likely A Frequent Event Several Days Warning One Day One to Two Days

Moderate Damage to Private Property Moderate Structural Damage to Public Facilities DAM FAILURE: 245, Moderately High Hazard Dam Failure, rated at 245. Although it is a rare event, the Group considered the impact of a dam failure to be catastrophic in terms of casualties and property damage. This is due to the fact that five dams affect the watersheds within Steuben County: the Arkport and Almond Dams, both located within the County, the Tioga-Hammond and Cowanesque Dams in Pennsylvania and the Bradford dam a low impact, privately owned dam located in the Town of Bradford at the south end of Lamoka Lake. A Dam Failure specifically to the Arkport or Almond Dam would bring the most significant threat to the population because of its effect on the large population to the City of Hornell, which is in close proximity to the dam, causing little evacuation time. Failure of the Tioga-Hammond or Cowanesque Dams would provide severe damage to private and public infrastructure in Steuben County but would provide several hours of lead time for evacuations. Potential Several Locations Frequency: A Rare Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Less Than One Day Recovery Time: More Than Two Weeks Serious Injury or Death to Extremely Large Numbers Severe Damage to Private Property Severe Structural Damage to Public Facilities Hazard(s) rated as moderately low: LANDSLIDE, EXTREME TEMPS, CIVIL UNREST, ICE STORM, RADIOLOGICAL (TRANSIT, HAZMAT (FIXED SITE), EPIDEMIC LANDSLIDE: 236, Moderately Low Hazard Potential Several Locations Cascade Effects: Some Potential Frequency: An Infrequent Event No Warning Hazard Duration: One Day Recovery Time: Three Days to One Week Severe Damage to Private Property Severe Structural Damage to Public Facilities

EXTREME TEMPS: 232, Moderately Low Hazard Potential Throughout a Large Region Cascade Effects: Some Potential Frequency: A Frequent Event Several Days Warning Hazard Duration: Two to Three Days Recovery Time: One to Two Days Little or No Damage to Private Property CIVIL UNREST: 228, Moderately Low Hazard Potential Several Locations Frequency: A Regular Event Several Days Warning Hazard Duration: More Than One Week Recovery Time: One to Two Days Moderate Damage to Private Property Severe Structural Damage to Public Facilities ICE STORM: 197, Moderately Low Hazard Potential Throughout a Large Region Frequency: An Infrequent Event Several Days Warning Hazard Duration: One Day Recovery Time: Three Days to One Week Moderate Damage to Private Property Severe Structural Damage to Public Facilities RADIOLOGICAL (TRANSIT: 186, Moderately Low Hazard

Potential Throughout a Small Region Cascade Effects: Highly Unlikely Frequency: A Rare Event No Warning Hazard Duration: More Than One Week Recovery Time: More Than Two Weeks Little or No Damage to Private Property HAZMAT (FIXED SITE): 176, Moderately Low Hazard Potential Several Locations Cascade Effects: Some Potential Frequency: An Infrequent Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Less Than One Day Recovery Time: Less Than One Day Moderate Damage to Private Property EPIDEMIC: 164, Moderately Low Hazard Potential Throughout a Large Region Cascade Effects: Some Potential Frequency: An Infrequent Event More Than One Week Warning Hazard Duration: More Than One Week Recovery Time: Three Days to One Week Little or No Damage to Private Property Hazard(s) rated as low: RADIOLOGICAL (FIXED SITE) RADIOLOGICAL (FIXED SITE): 117, Low Hazard

Potential Several Locations Cascade Effects: Highly Unlikely Frequency: A Rare Event No Warning Hazard Duration: Less Than One Day Recovery Time: Less Than One Day Serious Injury or Death Unlikely Little or No Damage to Private Property Biggest Hazards HAZARDS THAT OCCUR WITH NO WARNING* HAZMAT TRANSIT WILDFIRE TORNADO UTILITY FAILURE FIRE TRANS ACCIDENT DAM FAILURE LANDSLIDE RADIOLOGICAL (TRANSIT

HAZMAT (FIXED SITE) RADIOLOGICAL (FIXED SITE) * No warning was selected from the Onset Tab. HAZARDS THAT OCCUR MOST OFTEN* FLOOD HAZMAT TRANSIT WILDFIRE SEVERE STORMS FIRE WINTER STORM (SEVERE) EXTREME TEMPS *A frequent event was selected on frequency Tab. HAZARDS THAT PRESENT THE GREATEST THREAT TO LIFE* TRANS ACCIDENT DAM FAILURE *Serious injury and death in extremely large numbers was selected from the Impact Tab.