Pull-Out Strength of a Cast-In-Place Anchor Bolt in Concrete Exposed to High Temperature

Similar documents
A Study on Pullout Strength of Cast-in-place Anchor bolt in Concrete under High Temperature

SIMULATION OF THREE PHASE THREE LEG TRANSFORMER BEHAVIOR UNDER DIFFERENT VOLTAGE SAG TYPES

Conduction Heat Transfer

Chapter 3, Solution 1C.

Transient Conduction: Spatial Effects and the Role of Analytical Solutions

Chapter 7. Systems 7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.2 MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF LIQUID LEVEL SYSTEMS. Steady State Flow. A. Bazoune

Comparison of Building Codes and Insulation in China and Iceland

Feedback Principle :-

Lecture 12. Heat Exchangers. Heat Exchangers Chee 318 1

Physic 231 Lecture 33

Water vapour balance in a building moisture exposure for timber structures

Section 3: Detailed Solutions of Word Problems Unit 1: Solving Word Problems by Modeling with Formulas

Shell Stiffness for Diffe ent Modes

Design of Analog Integrated Circuits

CTN 2/23/16. EE 247B/ME 218: Introduction to MEMS Design Lecture 11m2: Mechanics of Materials. Copyright 2016 Regents of the University of California

Wp/Lmin. Wn/Lmin 2.5V

Spring 2002 Lecture #17

Introduction to Electronic circuits.

Analytical Modeling of Natural Convection in Horizontal Annuli

Circuits Op-Amp. Interaction of Circuit Elements. Quick Check How does closing the switch affect V o and I o?

Chem 204A, Fall 2004, Mid-term (II)

CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF KY BOOST CONVERTER

PHYSICS 536 Experiment 12: Applications of the Golden Rules for Negative Feedback

Lab 2e Thermal System Response and Effective Heat Transfer Coefficient

element k Using FEM to Solve Truss Problems

A method of constructing rock-analysis diagrams a statistical basks.

6. ELUTRIATION OF PARTICLES FROM FLUIDIZED BEDS

Department of Civil Engineering & Applied Mechanics McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada

A Proposal of Heating Load Calculation considering Stack Effect in High-rise Buildings

CIRCLE YOUR DIVISION: Div. 1 (9:30 am) Div. 2 (11:30 am) Div. 3 (2:30 pm) Prof. Ruan Prof. Naik Mr. Singh

Grade 12 Physics Exam Review

ME2142/ME2142E Feedback Control Systems. Modelling of Physical Systems The Transfer Function

4.8 Degradation of Elastomers by Heat and/or Radiation

55:041 Electronic Circuits

Conservation of Energy

of Large Helical Device

IGEE 401 Power Electronic Systems. Solution to Midterm Examination Fall 2004

_J _J J J J J J J J _. 7 particles in the blue state; 3 particles in the red state: 720 configurations _J J J _J J J J J J J J _

Analysis The characteristic length of the junction and the Biot number are

Advances in Engineering Research (AER), volume 102 Second International Conference on Mechanics, Materials and Structural Engineering (ICMMSE 2017)

A New Method for Solving Integer Linear. Programming Problems with Fuzzy Variables

^YawataR&D Laboratory, Nippon Steel Corporation, Tobata, Kitakyushu, Japan

V. Electrostatics Lecture 27a: Diffuse charge at electrodes

Chapter 3 Describing Data Using Numerical Measures

A/2 l,k. Problem 1 STRATEGY. KNOWN Resistance of a complete spherical shell: r rk. Inner and outer radii

, which yields. where z1. and z2

2 Analysis of the non-linear aerodynamic loads of hypersonic flow. 1 General Introduction

3-42. Chapter 15 Steady Heat Conduction. Heat Conduction in Cylinders and Spheres

Simulated Power of the Discrete Cramér-von Mises Goodness-of-Fit Tests

ALUMINIUM ELECTROLYTIC CAPACITORS PG - LL9 Long Life Grade

Chapter 6 : Gibbs Free Energy

rmmmo BY: ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARDIZATION DATA FOR MONEL AND K-MONEL. FASTENERS Conducted for: Department of the Navy Bureau of Ships

MONITORING, INSECTICIDE APPLICATION, AND MATING DISRUPTION. D. Flaherty, G. S. Sibbett, K. Kelley, R. Rice, and J. Dibble

The optimal delay of the second test is therefore approximately 210 hours earlier than =2.

CS 477/677 Analysis of Algorithms Fall 2007 Dr. George Bebis Course Project Due Date: 11/29/2007

OFF-AXIS MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF FRP COMPOSITES

ME 307 Machine Design I. Chapter 8: Screws, Fasteners and the Design of Nonpermanent Joints

Bi-level Optimization Method of Air-conditioning System Based on Office Building Energy Storage Characteristics

Week3, Chapter 4. Position and Displacement. Motion in Two Dimensions. Instantaneous Velocity. Average Velocity

Module B3. VLoad = = V S V LN

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 1, No 3, 2010

State-Space Model Based Generalized Predictive Control for Networked Control Systems

SPH3U1 Lesson 06 Kinematics

COMPARISON OF SOME RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS BETWEEN REDUNDANT SYSTEMS REQUIRING SUPPORTING UNITS FOR THEIR OPERATIONS

Experiment 1 Mass, volume and density

A mathematical model for complete stress-strain curve prediction of permeable concrete

THE EFFECT OF BEAM TO COLUMN CONNECTION IN ARC PORTAL FRAME

THERMAL TEST LEVELS & DURATIONS

PERFORMANCE OF HEAVY-DUTY PLANETARY GEARS

BME 5742 Biosystems Modeling and Control

Sirous Zamanirad 1, Said Mazaheri 2, Mehrdad Ghafourian 1

LAB 4: Modulus of elasticity

Approach: (Equilibrium) TD analysis, i.e., conservation eqns., state equations Issues: how to deal with

Lifetime prediction of EP and NBR rubber seal by thermos-viscoelastic model

PHOTOSYNTHESIS THE PRACTICALS 16 APRIL 2014

The APS Transfer Line from Linac to Injector Synchrotron.

THE CURRENT BALANCE Physics 258/259

Torsion Stiffness of Thin-walled Steel Beams with Web Holes

EE 204 Lecture 25 More Examples on Power Factor and the Reactive Power

CHAPTER 3: FEEDBACK. Dr. Wan Mahani Hafizah binti Wan Mahmud

ERROR RESEARCH ON A HEPA FILTER MEDIA TESTING SYSTEM OF MPPS(MOST PENETRATION PARTICLE SIZE) EFFICIENCY

Numerical Transient Heat Conduction Experiment

PT326 PROCESS TRAINER

Effect of loading frequency on the settlement of granular layer

Thermodynamics Partial Outline of Topics

Physics 107 HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT #20

NUMBERS, MATHEMATICS AND EQUATIONS

Study Group Report: Plate-fin Heat Exchangers: AEA Technology

OTHER USES OF THE ICRH COUPL ING CO IL. November 1975

CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSIONS

Please review the following statement: I certify that I have not given unauthorized aid nor have I received aid in the completion of this exam.

NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS. ORIGINALLY ISSUED June 19^3 as Eestricted Bulletin 3F29

Section 6-2: Simplex Method: Maximization with Problem Constraints of the Form ~

CHAPTER 4 DIAGNOSTICS FOR INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATIONS

NOTE ON APPELL POLYNOMIALS

Flipping Physics Lecture Notes: Simple Harmonic Motion Introduction via a Horizontal Mass-Spring System

AQA GCSE Physics. Topic 7: Magnetism and Electromagnetism. Notes. (Content in bold is for Higher Tier only)

t r m o o H Is The Sensitive Information Of Your Company Completely Secure?

Exercises H /OOA> f Wo AJoTHS l^»-l S. m^ttrt /A/ ?C,0&L6M5 INFERENCE FOR DISTRIBUTIONS OF CATEGORICAL DATA. tts^e&n tai-ns 5 2%-cas-hews^, 27%

CONVEX COMBINATIONS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

Transcription:

Pull-Out Strength f a Cast-In-Place Anchr Blt n Cncrete Expsed t Hgh Temperature Katsuk Takguch, Jun Hashmt Tky Insttute f Technlgy, Japan. ABSTRACT! Many anchr blts are used n nuclear-related facltes n rder t fast sme equpments and ppes. Abut these anchr blts, the pssbltes shuld exst n beng expsed t hgh temperature due t accdent. Hwever, lttle nfrmatn s avalable regardng the effects f hgh temperatures n the behavr f anchr blts. T btan basc expermental data and t examne the respnse f cast-n-place anchr blts t hgh temperature expsure, pull-ut strength f an anchr blt durng heatng and after heatng was examned. The maxmum temperature n ths test s 5 C. Tests results shw that the pull-ut strength under hgh temperature up t 5 C decrease sgnfcantly. Based n these results, a lnear relatnshp between pull-ut strength and temperature s emprcally frmulated. 1. INTRODUCTION Sme recent research n hgh temperature behavr f cncrete shws that ts strength wll decrease wth further ncrease f temperature and ther mechancal prpertes als get wrse, due t dryng shrnkage, thermal stress and s n. 1) It s als reprted that the spallng happens n the surface f cncrete subjected t elevated temperature. 2) In nuclear facltes, many anchr blts are embedded n cncrete structures n rder t supprt equpments and ppes. There s pssblty that these anchr blts wll be expsed t hgh temperature n a shrt tme by sme accdent, and that the pull-ut strength wll decrease. Hwever, lttle nfrmatn s avalable regardng the effects f hgh temperatures n the behavr f anchr blts. Therefre, they are usually desgned wthut cnsderatn fr hgh temperature effects. In ths research, pull-ut tests f cast-n-place anchr blt were carred ut at dfferent temperatures up t 5 C. The bjectves are t btan basc expermental data and t examne the respnse f cast-n-place anchr blts t hgh temperature expsure. At present, there are frmulas t determne pull-ut strength f a cast-n-place anchr blt. ACI 3) prpses the frmula as fllws; P = 1.1~~ A~ (1) A~ = z~h (h + d) (2) Where, P" pull-ut strength (kg), qb :reductn factr, cmpressve strength f cncrete (kg/cm2), Ac: effectve area f cne faled surface (cm2), h: embedment depth (cm) and D" dameter f a stud (cm). In "Desgn Recmmendatn fr Cmpste Cnstructn ''4) publshed by the Archtectural Insttute f Japan s gven as fllws; P = A~~ (3) Anther frmula prpsed by R. Elgenhausen 5), P = kx/ ~ x h 1"5 (4) where, k s the emprcal ceffcent (=15.7kg/cm).

2. EXPERIMENT 2.1 SPECIMEN In all, twenty-three specmens wee prepared. The dmensns and detals f the specmens are llustrated n Fg.1. All f specmens are square cncrete blcks wth a sde length f 24mm cnsderng the cne faled area, and wth a depth f 12mm. An anchr blt used n ths study s JIS standardzed M12-blt wth a nmnal length f 8mm, and wth a thread length f 3 mm as shwn n Fg.2. In rder t prevent tensn falure, a headed stud blt wasembedded at the center f the tp surface f all the specmens, and the embedment depth frm the tp surface f the cncrete t the upper surface f the blt head s 3mm as shwn n Fg.3. Fur square nuts and steal ppes were nstalled t be fxed wth the testng apparatus. Only fve specmens equpped wth therm-cuples t measure the temperatures f the cncrete and the blt nsde the specmen durng heatng. Tw therm-cuples are t measure the temperatures f anchr blt and the thers are t measure the temperature f cncrete. (See Fg.l) Ordnary nrmal cncrete was used wth desgn cmpressve strength f 35kg/cm 2. Sx hurs after castng f cncrete, the specmens were cured by cverng wet sand. Ths curng sand remved n the day f testng. The ages f the cncrete at the test were 48~94days. The results f cmpressve and splt tests f cncrete cylnder durng the testng days are shwn n Fg.4. The average f cmpressve and splttng tensle strength f the cncrete cylnder at the testng was 479kgf/cm 2 and 35kgf/cm 2, respectvely. 24 6 12 6 I M12 1.75............ b~ b~!,~;;'~,, ~ J 5 [ 3 87.5 Fg.2 Detal f Anchr blt II 1.2[ tt3 "e-',-: f 3 -r "-, L,~ _'- -~r~,,,,,,,, ',', I',,,,,.... ~ Steel Ppe I ~ ~ Cncrete Temperature measurement pnts Fg.1 Detal f specmen Fg.3 Detal f embedment

6 5 -~ Cmpressve strength I " 8 rq 4 3 2 1 - - [ O Splttng tensle strength I @ 2 -... --6 9"--@- % 6 t @ 4 "~ 2 Dameter and heght f cylnder: 1cm ~ 2cm (fr cmpressve strength test) 1cm ~ 1cm (fr splttng tensle strength test) I J, I 48days 49days 59days 68days 77days 94days Fg.4 Results f cmpressve and splt test fcncrete cylnder 2.2 PULL-OUT TESTING AND HEATING METHOD The apparatus fr pull-ut test s llustrated n Fg.5. The specmen was fxed t the testng apparatus wth fur blts as shwn n Fg.6, then ts anchr blt was cnnected t the end f the ladng beam. T examne the rat f frces f these fur blts durng the pull-ut test, the stran gauges were fxed n each f blt. (See Fg.7) Ths measurement was carred ut n fur specmens. Fg.8 shws the detal f cnnectn f the ladng beam and anchr blt. At frst, anchr blt was cnnected wth treaded steel bar by usng cupler. Then, ths treaded steel bar was cnnected t ladng beam. The tensle lad s appled t an anchr blt by applyng lads t the ther end f ladng beam. Here, the tensle lad frm the ladng beam was prevusly measured. The detal f heatng the specmen s llustrated n Fg.9. T mprve thermal effcency, the nsulatrs were nstalled arund the specmen and the heaters. One sde f specmen wth anchr blt was heated by ht ar by ncreasng ts temperature usng the electrc heater wth Nchrme wres. Abve the specmen, a therm-cuple was emplyed t measure the ar temperature near the heatng surface f specmen. (See Fg.1) Ths temperature was cntrlled wth the prcesses f heatng as shwn n Fg.11. Unless the specmens fracture at earler stage, each temperature (15 C, 3 C, 5 C) was kept cnstant fr tw hurs. Hwever, the ntal temperature ncrease depends n the perfrmance f the heaters and was nt cntrlled. Insulatr ~ ' I-Inge Ladng Beam / I 14!! t Fg.5 Apparatus fr the pull ut test

' A ~Cncrete '. [ ":~:~,,' P" :~.. ~?);~-. ----~j~/~f"'k..embedded Square Nut Steel ppe ~ I ~ ". A [ Blt.1_.- f7 I~ III ~~" Insulatr ~\\\\\\\"~ I~\\\\\~ Washer Steel Beam I n' I t _J ~/ ~ ~ A-A' '- Sectl )n... "-~:" Steel Plate _fl~~~fl,..-,, Pn.. ',.. Bearng upler I~.JlTreaded Steel Bar Fg.6 Detal f methd t fx specmen t apparatus Fg.7 Detal f blt wth stran gauge I I Fg.8 Detal f cnnectn f ladng beam and anchr blt Heater, Steel Plate v /AA,////////)/'//I~'; I';~l~H~'~' ";'~nsul r Therm-cuple I /~[2. ~1" Insulatr~. _, ~.-,,, g//z,~ ~, ~';.:,~ ~ c~ r///a.%... %.-.. ~:2.,~, ~ / f.,-.. I'///Am ~.;x;: -'~ z:2 zx :;.,.:;: ~ / Therrr,,pe IV//,I ~! ~\ ~! cj /... x r///j//////////////, / Blt Fg.9 Methd f heatng [ II 'p ~ [~ Cncrete_. Fg.1 Detal f therm-cuple t measure ar temperature 6 [ 5 C (I) 5 C (II) _ ] 5 r-,........ ---,t... "... "a~/ t 4 / (Endm~f / heatng) (End f heatng) I e / 3c 3... / ~:~ I ~ h e a t n g ) OOlt... I 1 ~ (End f heatng) ] Or., I / 1 2 3 4 5 Tme(hr.).. Fg.ll Prcess f heatng

2.3 SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENT In ths expermental nvestgatn, twenty-three specmens, as shwn n Table 1, were tested. These specmens were dvded nt three man seres. In seres N.l, pull-ut strength under nrmal temperature was examned. T examne the effect f hgh temperature n pull-ut strength, ffteen specmens were tested n seres N.2. The specmens are heated whle applyng cnstant tensle lad n the anchr blt. The tensle lad was decded based n the pull-ut strength under nrmal temperature, that s the results f seres N.l, and the results f specmens tested earler n the same seres. Fve specmens were tested n seres N.3 t study temperature transent nsde the specmens. Abut N.3-a, the effect f successn f heatng n cncrete was examned by heatng fur tmes up t 3 C. Fr the specmens f seres N.2 that dd nt fal durng heatng and the specmens f seres N.3, pull-ut test was carred ut after ther temperatures g dwn t nrmal temperature. Here, the specmen was cled wth r wthut nsulatrs, and the effect f dfference f prcess f clng n pull-ut strength was examned. Table 1 Lst f specmens Name f specmen N.l-a Tesle lad (P) Prcess f heatng Pull ut test under nrmal temperature,n.2-a 1.31 t (.7P) '~1 3c d'~2.935 t (.5P) 3 C 5 c( I ) N.3-a j.56 t (.3P) 5 C( I ) k.29 t 5 C( I ) 1.42 t (.23P) 5 C( I ) m.8 t 5 C( II ) n.7t 5 C ( II ) 1.31 t (.7P) 15 C 3 C (4tmes) 3 C (2tmes) (wth and wthut nsulatrs) c 5 c( I ) d 5 C ( II ) e 15 C ~ 1 P : Average f pull-ut strength f nrmal temperature ~2 Abut nly N.2-d, the prcess f heatng was changed n testng, and the lad was als changed durng heatng.

3. EXPERIMANTAL RESULT 3.1 THE RATIO OF STRAIN OF BOLTS Fg.12 ndcates the relatn f the'rat f stran f fur blts used t fx the specmen t the testng apparatus and the lad appled t an anchr bblt. It can be bserved frm ths fgure that, even thugh the lad appled t anchr blt was ncreased, the rat f stran f fur blts was cnstant durng pull-ut testng. The measured rat f stran f blts f fur specmens s als shwn n Fg.12. Frm ths fgure, t can be seen that, as t tw specmens, the lad appled the anchr blt was evenly dstrbuted t the fur blts. On the ther hand, the lad was unevenly dstrbuted as t the thers, and the mnmum stran was 7% f the maxmum stran. 1.1... ~... ---ll--i------ll- -ll--- ll--u-'-ll'---i--lll-- ~l--ii-- -II --II--...--~. - n- --I!--. ll- -ll.9 "~.8 ~.7 Q ~.6.5..................::...::........ --.-- ~l, --.-.- -.-- 4,- -~ - -~--.-- -, 4, --4~ ~ --4......!...!...!... ::. :.4 I Lad appled t anchr blt Fg.12 Rat f strans f fur blts 3.2 RESULTS OF PULL-OUT TESTS Fg.13 shws the hstry f the temperature and the lad f the specmens f seres N.2. In ths fgure, the temperature shws the value by the therm-cuple abve the specmen t be measured the ar temperature near the heatng surface f specmen. The specmens N.2-e,f and the specmen N.2-g were cled wthut and wth the nsulatr, but the effect f dfference clng n the pull-ut strength f them was nt seen. Cmparng the results f the specmenn.2-k and N.2-n, the temperatures nsde these specmens at the end f heatng and the pull-ut strength f them were almst the same. Therefre, the effect f the dfference f prcess f heatng between 5 C( I ) and 5 C( ]I ) n the pull-ut strength was nt als seen. The specmen N.2-d dd nt fracture under.935t f the tensle lad even when the ar temperature reached 5 C. Hwever, the specmen N.2-h and fractured under the same tensle lad when the ar temperature reached abut 4 C. Fg.14~17 shw the results f temperature measurement f the specmens n seres N.3. Frm Fg.14, whch ndcates measured temperature transent f the specmen N.3-c, t can be bserved that there s lttle dfference amng the

................ ' 6. '. '., 1 "" ~N~*~~, 3524 f ~ rature I "... '... 1 1 '~ ::., "lrme(hr.~.1.2.3.4.5 :.6.7 3 ~ I--..,.,,.,~.l ~ 2 " <N.2-a> 6 ~.... : :. 5 ~Hstry f temperature 4 3...... /......:~~~... 2 1... ".". 'Tm~hr'.''.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 ' 3.5 3!. ':!,~, "~ ~ 1.5.......... "'' ~.. X 1.5.. ~ : ', <N.2-d> ~6 ~:~'5!~Hstryftemperature[... '," "'... ~ 4... ;--. '....,~ 3 ~!~ 1 '}... "": "}... m e(hr, 1 2 3 : 4 5 3....!. 2.5 - - Hstry f ladng I...... ',...... I :: ; :: 6, ; :',! 5,-, "'l--hstry f temperature I', "...!.. 4 : :: 3O ~ 1.. ~ ; :.1.2' '.3.4.5.6.7 3, :,! '~ 2.5 - ---- Hstry f ladng......::...... ~".51'52!!:!!~l! ':,!~~. l..l. ' <N.2-b>,--, 6 / : ~ ~ : I 5 [1 ~Hstry f temperature I......... / 4 U-' : : : '...!...',... 3 ~!!..........!... 2...... -............. 1............;... [ ~ :: Tmb(hr.] 5 I 15 2,~,- ~, ~! 2'5 ~"~ ~/ --,..,.,,-,.q...... :... ": ~"~".51'52I l!ll l 'l ~. I <N.2-e> 6 : : ', 4... ~2 1... ~" ~!! ~~..("r:.1.2.3.4.5 '.6.7 3 I ~:!~: I 2 l...... :;... '~..:;... 6,.~ 5 4 E perature I... 3 2OO I ~ " ; Thae(hr.)l 3.1.2.3.4 ',.5.6.7 1,1.5.... <N.2-c> 6, :.!, 11 ~ " " " '" ~m;hr.) 5 1 15 21} 25 3,. :, 2,5 I --Hstryfladng]" }... }... I.5 <N.2-f> 6.... ~,,, 4 fl... 1 ~ " ' ~ ~: t:me(hr. 3.1.2.3.4.5 ~.6.7 ; ; r ', 2.5 2 - - Hstry f ladng_ [...!... : ',!....5 <N.2-g> 6.... : :, : ] ~" ~ ~ -- ~me(hr.] ~.;... 4 3 ~" 2 1 3.1.2.3.4.5.6 ',.7.8 2.5 I -- Hstry f ladng......!"~...,~,"'2~ 1.51 l' ~" 21 2 2 'll l.., 2. '"...... ~, 1......5 1.5!..!.!!!! <N.2-h>,--,6. : ~ I 4 5 ' ~ ~ ftemperature -... ~ 3 ~-2 ~1 [ ~! Tme(hL 3 2.5 2 1.5 ~" 1.5 1 2 3 ' 4 5 t--"~--y "='n'l.......5 <N.2-> 6 :!! : 5 ' ~Hstry f temperature " " :: " ' ', "... 4.1... I...!...... 3 2, m(h;..1.2.3.4.5.6 :.7.8 2... 1.5.... :. ~. ~ :...., :.... / <N.2-j> <N.2-k> <N.2-1> 6... I 6 ' ': '' "-, " " ~Hstry f temperature ' ""... 4 ~ 4..... 3 ~ 3 :.,. '... "... loo../...!... +mw; ~..... : 2 4 6 8 ' 1 12 1 2 3 4 '5 6 2.5 -- stry f lad g 3f, 2 " 2.52 - stry f,adr,....... "" ~' 1.53f! ] 6 ~5,,y,,m,,a,u,... I... '...,... t 4 ~ 3 ~2 ~1 V...!... "! T~e(hr. 1 3.2.4.6.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 2...7...H...s. t. r.y...!...a.d!n.......... 1-7..'-.- -." -." -.5 t........5 <N.2-m> <N.2-n> <N.2-> Fg.13 The hstry f temperature and ladng.:: "

:: 6 5 [...::... - f - S - 7 ~......,~.. ~ ~ /' 3... 2... 1... /'........5 1 1.5 2 Tme(hr.) Fg.14 Temperature transent n hrzntal lne f specmen 6 :...... ~.................. -21 ~' 4 I.l/s T = u ~. ~ - ~ -. I 3,~; ':~"~~~"'~.~~... I..4 ;/t,:,,.~"": ~" 2... 1 ~'" ~'"... ~'~... n l a a 2 4 6 8 1 Tme(hr.) Fg.15 Temperature transent n vertcal lne f specmen Once -- -- Twce 35 - ~ Three tmes Fur tmes 3... f "'" ~ ~_,,,IL-., m.-,nm~ dna-,l- ~ ~ 25......,... ~-... "~':--'~--'--'- m, e,~ ~ ~.,,, 2 I,,:... "-- ~ ~... ::...... ~... ;... ~... ;.--;... -r.~-,, :,, ~,.. 6.~, ~,.. 5...!... :-" "~-,~"~"..., ~. ~ ~ m ~ m n,,, I,,, I,,, I,,, I,,,.2.4.6.8 1 Tme(hr.) Fg.16 Temperature transent n specmen heated repeatedly

- temperatures f the hrzntal pnts n the specmen. Fg.15 shws the temperature transent f the specmen N.3-d durng and after heatng. It can be seen that the temperatures n the specmen went up fr a shrt whle after the end f heatng. Fg.16 shws the temperature transent by repettnal heatng n the specmen N.3-a. The frst heatng was lasted fr 4 mnutes. The temperature transent T the cncrete part whse temperature was under 1 C at the end f the frst heatng fllwed the same path as the frst heatng. Hwever, the temperature f the part f cncrete whse temperature was ver 1 C elevated faster than the prevus heatng. Ths result revealed that the thermal characterstc f cncrete such as thermal cnductvty changed by evapratn f water n cncrete. Hwever, there s lttle dfference between the pull-ut strength f N.3-a and f N.2-e-g, and the effect f repettn f heatng n pull-ut strength was nt seen. Fg.17 shws the temperature dstrbutn n the specmen durng heatng wth each prcess f heatng. Nte that S shaped f temperature dstrbutn was due t the dfference f thermal cnductvty between the blt and cncrete. It was bserved that there were tw types f falure mde n all the specmens. Except N.2-d and, the surface nstalled an anchr blt f all the specmens whch fractured durng heatng brke nt peces wth a sund f explsn. (See Fg.18) Meanwhle, fr the ther specmens, an anchr blt was pulled ut due t radal cracks arund the anchr blt. (See Fg.19) ~, 2 4 6 8 8 t~... 1 12 :' '-'' -'' '-'!-' '-'-' '-" ' L_! '_' '_ ' :: ~ 75m';" 3ran' ' --~ + l/- -- <7..._... +... +......... -- -e 5 1 15 2 25 3 Temperature (~) O!... _~...... _~ 2 4. 6 8 1 [1/l l/ib/ + '"" ' 12 kll L,,.,~////://,2re,..: r.................... " 1 2 3 4 5 Temperature ( C) <N.3-b> <N.3-c> 2 4 + 72/... I ' ' '91jml, n: ' ' '!... D-? mp._ -~ -,,... - I. ~ / ~ Z_,L/_ ]~S//]( ~/~/~...-..-..-. 2 4 /7/4; 77;;.,, 77/7-- /4m'- + 4Om+. 6 6 7 ran. g -~- -- 4 ~, a 1 12....,............,.... 1 2 3 4 5 - -~- -e ~ ~ 8O 1 12........ I.... 5 1 15,~a,,n~. ~>~ ~<~~ Temperature (9) Temperature ( C) <N.3-d> <N.3-e> Fg.17 Measured temperature dstrbutn n specmens

~}~..,.~.. :~ ~-:~" :.'- ~:~ ~...~... ~ -' ~ ~-~:~.... ~'k'~:~'~ "..~-.,.::.-., -,--,,,v-... - ~.~;.,-~.:, ~.,~... ~!.,:~ N ~... ~.~...~.~..~: -. ~. ~,....!:::~.+...*~,.*,... "... ~:~'~"~... ~: :~:~ :~... '~. <N.2-c> <N.2-> ~.'.~- "..~ ~:..! ~..., ~.~~ ~~,'-~I~#~.~..~, '.~ ~ ~:~.. ~... ~ ~., ~ ~:~,g~,~=u-:;~:~-~--..~ :. ~.:~,~ ~,.. ' ~ ~ ~::~~ ==========================================.,r~ ~: :..:... ~:~ ~:.... ~::~ ~:: :..,~:,,.,-. ~... ~... ~,:~ "~..~-~ <N.l-b> <N.2-m> Fg.19 Falure mde f the specmen wth crack Surface f~...,...,... f~/~-- 2 '-,-, 4 r~ 6 ~ 8 r~,,,, 1 ' --O-- N.2-a "NSN- N.2-b,c ~N.2-h - "~'-- N.2- :~/::':, ~. N.2-j V ~ '! :, -<z-- N.2.1 -'O-" N.2-12 " : 5 1 15 2 25 3 Temperature (~G) O Fg.2 Temperature dstrbutn n the specmens at the breakng pnt 1

. Abut the specmens whch fractured durng heatng, the temperature dstrbutn n the specmens when they fractured are ndcated n Fg.2. Frm ths fgure, t can be bserved that the dfference f temperatures nsde N.2- s much smaller than the thers, and the effect f thermal stress wuld be lttle. Ths prbably caused the dfference f falure mde. Wth the specmens except N.2-, the explsn prbably happened because bth the thermal stress and steam pressure ccurred nsde cncrete and they are added t the stress cnveyed by cncrete by the tensle lad appled t an anchr blt. The relatn f pull-ut strength and temperature durng heatng are pltted n Fg.21 and after heatng n Fg.22. In these fgures, the test results f specmens seres N.1 are als ndcated and the vertcal axs stands fr the pull-ut strength nrmalzed by the average f the test results f specmens seres N.1. The average f tested pull-ut strength under nrmal temperature was hgher than the ne calculated by Eq.(2), and almst the same as the ne calculated by Eq.(3). Frm these fgures, the pull-ut strength durng heatng up t 5 C decreases t abut 2% f t under nrmal temperature, whle the pull-ut strength after heatng decreases t abut 5% f t under nrmal temperature. Based n these results, a lnear relatnshp between pull-ut strength and temperature s emprcally frmulated as shwn n Fg.21 and Fg.22. The lnear relatnshp between pull-ut strength and temperature durng heatng s presented by the frmula as fllws; P / P = -1.49 x 1-3T + 1.4 (5) The fllwng frmula s the relatnshp between pull-ut strength and temperature after heatng; where, P: pull-ut strength under nrmal temperature(kg), and T: temperature ( C). P / P = -9.94 x 1-4T + 1.2 (6) 1.2 '1 ' ' ' '!................!... k 4 ; hl.5.8.6.4....2.... 1 2 3 4 5 6 Temperature ( C) Fg.21 Relatn between pull-ut strength and temperature durng heatng 1.2 'f,' ' '!................ k O~Bx~hl.5! ' ' '".8.6.4 P.2,,,,!,,, 1 2 3 4 5 6 Temperature Fg.22 Relatn between pull-ut strength and temperature after heatng 11 ( C)

4. CONCLUSIONS In ths research, the pull-ut testng f a cast-n place anchr blt n cncrete under hgh temperature was carred ut. The results shws that pull ut strengthf a cast-n-place anchr blt decrease greatly bth durng heatng and after heatng. Frm ths expermental nvestgatn wth maxmum temperature 5 C, t s cncluded 1) Putl-ut strength f a cast-n-place anchr blt decrease t 2% whle a cast-n-place anchr blt n cncrete was heated. 2) In the case f a cast-n-place anchr blt whch s tested after beng cled t nrmal temperature, pull-ut strength f a cast-n-place anchr blt decrease t 5%. Based n the results f the test, a lnear relatnshp between pull-ut strength and temperature s emprcally frmulated durng heatng and after heatng. Wth ths expermental research, the basc date f the pull-ut strength f a cast-n-place anchr blt n cncrete under hgh temperature culd be btaned and the utlne f the relatnshp between temperature and pull-ut strength culd be bserved. Based n the results f the experment that were btaned ths tme, s shuld be pnted ut that future studes are needed wth the same specmens reprted n ths paper t btan mre date n pull-ut strength f a cast-n-place anchr blt under hgh temperatures. Frm the results f falure mde n ths test, the specmens were t small wth cne falure. Research s als underway t use bgger sze specmens t btan cne falure type f fracture. Furthermre, the pull-ut tests f a cast-n-place under hgh temperature wll be carred ut by usng the specmens wth the dfferent embedment depth f an anchr blt. T examne the effect f the rate f temperature ncrease n the pull-ut strength f an anchr blt, a cmprehensve test prgram s planed t be carred ut n near future. REFERENCES 1. Abe, T., Furumura, F., Tmatsur, K., Kurha, K. and Kkub, I., "Mechancal prpertes f hgh strength cncrete at hgh temperatures," Jurnal f Structural and Cnstructn Engneerng (Transactns f AIJ), N.515, 1999, pp. 163-168. 2. Inue, A., Suzuk, S. and Yanag, K., "Effect f curng methd and msture cntent f cncrete fr fre resstance f nrmal-weght cncrete and lght-weght cncrete," Summares f Techncal Papers f Annual Meetng, AIJ, 1997, pp. 793-794. 3. Prpsed Addtn t Cde Requrements fr Nuclear Safety Related Cncrete Structures (ACI 349-76); ACI Cmmttee 349, ACI Jurnal, August 1978 4. Archtectural Insttute f Japan, Desgn Recmmendatn fr Cmpste Cnstructn, 1985 5. Rehm, G., Elgenhausen, R. and Mallee, R., Be festngungsrechnk: Betnkalender, Vl. ]I, 1992 6. Takguch, K., Harada, R., "Pull-ut strength f an anchr blt embedded n cracked cncrete," Structural Mechancs n Reactr Technlgy (SMRT-15), Vl.VI, 1999, pp.35-31 12