Effect of Organic Soil Fertility and Fungicide Treatments on Yield and Pest Management, Neely-Kinyon Farm-2015

Similar documents
Avoiding Stink Bug Damage and Flat Pod Syndrome in Soybean with a MGVI Cultivar and Planting Date Beaumont, TX 2005

Integrated Pest Management. Larry A. Sagers Utah State University Extension Regional Horticulturist

2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1

2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Early Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida

Pages in the Montana Master Gardener Handbook

Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of Insect Pests in an MG VII Soybean Beaumont, TX 2009 Soybean Nursery North No. 4

2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Mid to Full Season Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN AND DRY BEAN CROPS

Objectives. Teaching Basic Entomology. My questions for you. Anatomy of an insect 2/27/15

Vegetable Diagnostics 101: Insects and Diseases

3. Potato / HARS / CPB Systemic Trial

INSECTS AND PESTS OF AFRICAN VIOLETS By Mary Lou Harden

EFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS

Insect and other pests in high tunnel vegetables. Gerald Brust IPM Vegetable Specialist

Black grass bug adult Nabids Twice-stabbed stink bug Other bugs

Abstract. Introduction

Soybean Agronomy and Host Plant Resistance Beaumont, TX 2009

Diagnosing Plant Problems. A strategy to get started

Minute Pirate Bug: A Beneficial Generalist Insect Predator

Pulse Knowledge. Pea Aphid. Identification and Life Cycle. Host Crops and Crop Injury. Scouting and Economic Thresholds. Jennifer Bogdan, P.Ag.

Student Name: Teacher: Date: Test: 9_12 Agriculture AP41 - Horticulture I Test 2 Description: Pest Management District: Wake County Form: 501

ALS-Resistant Kochia Management in a Corn - Sugarbeet Rotation 2005 to 2006 and 2007 to Robert Wilson

Alfalfa Survey 2014 Summary

PURPOSE To develop a strategy for deriving a map of functional soil water characteristics based on easily obtainable land surface observations.

Cannabis Pests and the Insects That Eat Them!

W285. Matthew S. Wiggins Graduate Research Assistant Department of Plant Sciences. C. Owen Gwathmey Professor Emeritus Department of Plant Sciences

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN ONION AFTER THREE YEARS OF CORN HERBICIDES

History INVASIVE INSECTS THREATENING YOUR BACKYARD: BROWN MARMORATED STINK BUG & VIBURNUM LEAF BEETLE. Identification. Common Look-A-Likes 1/12/2015

An Introduction to Natural Enemies for Biological Control of Pest Insects

EVALUATiON OF YUKON HERBICIDE RATES FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN GROWN IN ROTATIONS FOLLOWED BY ONION

Components and science behind plant performance. Eric Tedford Technical Brand Manager Fungicides Syngenta Crop Protection

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN VARIOUS CROPS

over the next three weeks could lower this estimate significantly. Near perfect conditions are needed to realize this projected yield.

Facilitating biological control of insect pests on ornamental crops

2017 Appling County Cotton Meeting. Weed Control and a few other things

OPTIMIZING NITROGEN USE AND EVALUATING ETHEPHON USE IN WAXY BARLEY

Background and Assumptions

Managing stink bugs through cultural practices

Biocontrol of Rangeland Weeds TRA Pest Management Workshop, Feb 20, 11:15 am. Outline. Pest Management Workshop 2013 Bean, Rangeland Pest Control

Christopher ISU

Beneficial Aspects. Extent and Economic Importance. Entomology For Master Gardeners

Carrot. Wednesday afternoon 2:00 pm

Soybean Insecticide Screening Test 1 Field north of TRIA house Beaumont, TX 2014 I II III IV

Influence of different nitrogen levels on the management of Bt cotton sucking pests

Kansas State University Department of Entomology Newsletter

IPM: PESTS THREE MAIN POINTS

Changes in Plant Metabolism Induced by Climate Change

AGRONOMIC POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF USING PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE IN THE HIGH PLAINS

Background & Assumptions

Impact of Tobacco Thrips on Cowpea

Growth Stages of Wheat: Identification and Understanding Improve Crop Management

Relative Performance of Different Colour Laden Sticky Traps on the Attraction of Sucking Pests in Pomegranate

Proline Fungicide on Corn Silage to Reduce Mycotoxins

IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM

Unit D: Controlling Pests and Diseases in the Orchard. Lesson 5: Identify and Control Diseases in the Orchard

Trial 1: Weed control in established grapes

Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area

Protecting Pollinators in Home Lawns and Landscapes

2017 Cotton Weed Control and a few other things

Partial budgets for cover crops in Midwest row crop farming

Damsel Bug: A smooth-looking slender predator Cerruti R 2 Hooks $, Veronica Johnson* and Alan Leslie +, University of Maryland Dept.

Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems

Integrated Pest Management Program Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture UConn Extension

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.

Evaluation of Fall Application of Dual Magnum for Control of Yellow Nutsedge in Onions Grown on Muck Soils

Response of Cotton to Precision-Guided Cultivation and DSMA in a Dense Stand of Purple Nutsedge

2013 INTRODUCTION AND USE GUIDELINES 2013 GEORGIA COTTON COSTS AND RETURN BUDGET ESTIMATES

UC Alfalfa Variety Trials

PEST AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT

MICROCOMPUTER CROP COST AND RETURN GENERATOR

Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291

Cotton Insect Losses 1991

Precision Ag. Technologies and Agronomic Crop Management. Spatial data layers can be... Many forms of spatial data

Tropical Agricultural Research & Extension 16(4): 2014

Weather and Climate Risks and Effects on Agriculture

Pest Management for Vegetable Bedding Plants Grown in Greenhouses

A Guide to Exploring Caterpillars Count! Data

Michigan Farm Bureau Agriscience Lessons -- Connections to Michigan Content Standards

Click to edit Master title style Effect of seed and foliar treatments on vigor of soybean plants Jerseyville, IL

Gypsy Moth Defoliation Harpers Ferry, Va

Landscape Effects on Pest Management Clint Allen Ryan Jackson USDA-ARS-SIMRU

Field Guide to African Soybean Diseases and Pests

Since its inception in 1984, the

Common Beneficial Insects. Photo credit: Thelma Heidel-Baker

Population distribution of thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in rose plant within different plant parameters

Background and Assumptions

YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN LIBERTY AND ROUNDUP RESISTANT SUGAR BEETS

Effects of Two Types of Fertilizer and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza on Damping off Disease (Macrophomina phaseolina) of Cowpea (Vigna uniguiculata L.

Natural Enemies of Vegetable Pests

Whitney Cranshaw Colorado State University

2 nd International Webinar Conference

Protected Culture: Low Tunnels, High Tunnels, Exclusion Netting and how to control SWD in these situations

Orange - Planted October 23, Preplant fertilization was 23- June 26. Warsaw no-till - Planted October 19, 2006.

BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS

November 2018 Weather Summary West Central Research and Outreach Center Morris, MN

Background and Assumptions

Research Notes: G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology

2016 Soybean Vein Necrosis Disease Survey

6 Very Beneficial Insects: To Know Them Is To Love Them!

The Safety and Efficacy of Slow Release Diuron.

Transcription:

Effect of Organic Soil Fertility and Fungicide Treatments on Yield and Pest Management, Neely-Kinyon Farm-2015 Kathleen Delate, professor Departments of Horticulture & Agronomy Rebecca Johnson, research assistant Introduction Annual organic soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production in the U.S. has risen to more than 150,000 acres (USDA-ERS, 2005). Critical challenges associated with organic soybean production include weed control, bean leaf (Cerotoma trifurcata Förster), soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura), and soybean diseases, including the potential for soybean rust. Bean leaf beetle primarily vectors the seed-staining bean pod mottle virus (BPMV) and for providing sites for other seed-staining fungi such as purple stain [Cercospora kikuchii (Mastsumoto & Tomoyasu) M.W. Gardener] and Fusarium spp. According to Advisory Committee members, soil fertility could affect insect and disease pest pressure, so a study was established in 2009 to evaluate organic-compliant treatments to improve plant nutritional status and an anti-fungal disease product (Regalia, Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., Davis, CA). Regalia is made with an extract from the plant Reynoutria sachalinensis (giant knotweed) which, when sprayed on plants, activates natural plant defenses. This induced diseased resistance is not systemic (i.e., only treated green leaf area is protected), but there is a translaminar effect (i.e., when the product is sprayed on the top of a leaf, the bottom of that leaf also is protected). Reducing the extent of soybean staining was of great economic importance to organic producers who rely on the premiums associated with unstained seed, and preventing diseases could also increase yields in organic soybeans. Materials and Methods Blue River 30C3 organic soybeans were planted at the Neely-Kinyon Farm on June 9, 2015, at a rate of 175,000 seeds/acre. The experimental design consisted of a randomized complete block design of four treatments with four replications of each in plots measuring 20 x 10 feet with a 5-foot border between plots. The following treatments were studied: Midwest Bio-Ag organic fertilizer (50 lb N/acre) applied on July 12, a soap product applied at 2.5 oz. to 1 gal. water (Safer Soap, Wodstream Corp., Lititz, PA), Regalia applied at 4 quarts/acre; and a control (no sprays). Plots were maintained with rotary hoeings on June 19 and 22, and row cultivations on June 29, July 8, and July 14. Soybeans were walked on August 2 to remove any weeds above the canopy. Treatments were applied on July 24, August 18, September 1, September 14, and September 28. A visual pest and beneficial insect count was taken on soybean plants in three randomly-selected 10-ft of row per plot on July 16. Pest and beneficial insect sampling occurred by sweeping two 10-ft row of soybeans (8 sweeps total) with a 15-inch diameter net on August 10, August 25, September 9 and September 30. Samples were frozen until identification in the lab. Soybean grain was harvested on October 13. Soybean

grain quality was determined at the ISU Grain Quality Lab (Ames, IA). Results and Discussion Yields in the organic soybean trial were excellent in 2015, averaging 63 bu/acre over all treatments (Table 1), with no significant differences between treatments. Yields were less than the average of 79 bu/acre in 2014. There also were no significant differences in grain quality among treatments in 2015 (Table 2). Grain quality was excellent for organic soybeans, with an average protein content of 37%, 19% oil, 4.5% fiber, and 22% carbohydrates. Overall, the organic treatments did not affect pest or beneficial insect populations compared to the control (Tables 3-11). The visual count taken on July 16 showed an aphid and bean leaf beetle population of less than 1 insect per 10 ft of row (Table 3). The seasonal average aphid population was less than one aphid per 8 sweeps, with peak aphid population averaging 1 aphid per 8 sweeps on August 10 (Table 4), compared to 337 aphids per 8 sweeps on the non-resistant soybean variety, BR 34A7, in 2008. These averages compared to the 2014 average. The seasonal average bean leaf beetle population was 2 per 8 sweeps, and the peak bean leaf beetle population was on September 9 with 8 per 8 sweeps. This is higher than the seasonal average of less than 1 beetle per 8 sweeps in 2014. In 2015, thrips averaged 14 thrips per 8 sweeps. Peak populations for thrips occurred on September 9 when populations averaged 32 thrips per 8 sweeps. This is higher than the 2014 average of 2 thrips per 8 sweeps. Whiteflies averaged 2 whiteflies per 8 sweeps, with peak populations of 4 whiteflies per 8 sweeps on August 25, which was similar to the average of 5 whiteflies per 8 sweeps in 2014. Corn rootworms were present in all sweeps throughout the season, and averaged 1 beetle per 8 sweeps. The seasonal average of 4 beneficial per 8 sweeps, with the September 9 peak population of 7 beneficial per 8 sweeps, included numerous species of beneficial collected over the season. The most predominant beneficial insect was the minute pirate bug (MPB), Orius insidiosus, which attacks aphids, whiteflies and thrips. The seasonal average was 1 minute pirate bug per 8 sweeps and peak population was 3 minute pirate per 8 sweeps on September 9 (Table 8). On that sampling date, these predators were lower in the Midwest Bio Ag and Safer soap treatments compared the the Regalia treatment, but all treatments were not significantly different from the control. Spiders were also observed at every sampling date and averaged 1 per 8 sweeps overall, with peak populations of 2 spiders per 8 sweeps on August 25. Other beneficial included wasps, nabids and green (Tables 4-11). No soybean diseases were observed in sufficient quantities to warrant comparisons in 2015, including no signs of soybean rust. Seed staining averaged 0.70% (Table 12), which was similar to 2014 data. With few significant differences in pest and beneficial found among treatments in 2015, it was interesting to note the low numbers of whiteflies, but higher numbers of thrips, both of which are more prominent species in drought months. We will continue this trial in 2016 with new organic-compliant products.

Acknowledgments We would like to thank the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture for their support of the Neely-Kinyon organic sites. We also thank the Wallace Foundation for their support. Thanks also go to Meaghan Daley, Rachel Tan, Anjun Li, and Bob Turnbull for their help on production, data collection, and analytical aspects of this project. We also thank Blue River Hybrids, Kelly, IA; and Marrone Bio-Innovations, Inc., Davis, CA. Appreciation is expressed to Charles Hurburgh and Glen Rippke of the Grain Quality Lab, ISU.

Table 1. Yields in the Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 2015. Treatment Bu/acre Control 61.48 Midwest Bio Ag 61.52 Safer soap 67.59 Regalia 62.27 LSD 0.05 NS z Table 2. Soybean grain quality in the Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 11/27/15. Treatment Moisture Protein Oil Fiber Carbohydrates Control 9.15 36.75 19.25 4.53 21.48 Midwest Bio Ag 8.98 36.58 19.43 4.53 21.48 Compost Safer s Soap 9.03 36.55 19.45 4.50 21.50 Regalia 8.98 36.40 19.40 4.58 21.63 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS NS NS Table 3. Visual insect counts (numbers per 10 ft of row) in the Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 7/16/15. Treatment Bean leaf Cucumber Aphids Control 0.00 0.08 0.67 Midwest bio ag 0.00 0.00 1.00 Safer soap 0.00 0.00 0.42 Regalia 0.08 0.00 1.50 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS

Table 4. Key soybean pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 8/10/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Control 2.00 0.75 1.50 2.75 0.75 0.50 1.50 Midwest Bio Ag 0.67 0.67 3.33 1.67 1.67 0.33 2.33 Safer soap 1.75 0.25 0.75 2.50 2.00 0.75 3.75 Regalia 1.00 0.00 2.25 1.00 2.00 0.50 2.75 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS NS NS NS NS Table 5. Other pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 8/10/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Treatment Caterpillars Nabids Whiteflies Grasshoppers Green Leafhoppers Tarnished Wasps Control 0.25 0.00 2.75 1.00 0.00 0.50 0.25 0.00 Midwest bio 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 ag Safer soap 0.50 0.00 1.25 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 Regalia 0.25 0.25 1.75 1.50 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS NS -- NS NS NS Table 6. Key soybean pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 8/25/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Control 1.75 0.25 16.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 5.25 Midwest bio ag 1.00 0.00 16.75 6.50 0.75 1.25 3.75 Safer soap 1.00 0.25 18.50 5.25 1.50 2.00 4.75 Regalia 1.00 0.25 11.75 4.50 1.00 2.25 7.75 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS NS NS NS NS

Table 7. Other pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 8/25/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Treatment Caterpillars Nabids White flies Grasshoppers Green Leafhoppers Tarnished Wasps Control 0.25 0.00 4.50 2.00 0.50 1.00 0.25 1.75 Midwest Bio 0.00 0.00 5.00 2.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.25 Ag Safer soap 0.25 1.00 3.50 1.75 0.25 0.25 0.50 0.50 Regalia 0.25 0.50 4.00 1.00 0.00 1.25 0.00 3.00 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS NS NS NS NS NS Table 8. Key soybean pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 9/9/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Control 2.25 9.50 29.00 5.00 2.75ab y 1.25 8.25 Midwest Bio Ag 0.50 10.50 34.25 2.75 1.25b 1.50 5.75 Safer soap 0.50 7.50 28.25 1.50 1.50b 1.00 4.50 Regalia 1.00 5.75 34.50 3.00 5.00a 0.75 9.00 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS NS 0.0146 NS NS Table 9. Other pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 9/9/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Treatment Caterpillars Nabids Whiteflies Grasshoppers Green Leafhoppers Tarnished Wasps Control 1.00 2.25 1.75 0.25 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.75 Midwest Bio 0.25 2.50 2.75 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.75 0.00 Ag Safer soap 0.50 1.50 1.50 0.00 0.25 0.75 0.00 0.00 Regalia 0.50 2.25 2.50 0.00 0.25 0.50 1.00 0.00 LSD 0.05 NS z NS NS NS NS NS NS NS

Table 10. Key soybean pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 9/30/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Control 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.50 0.75 1.50 Midwest Bio Ag 0.00 1.00 11.50 0.25 0.00 1.50 2.25 Safer soap 0.00 0.33 2.00 0.67 0.00 1.00 2.00 Regalia 0.00 0.75 9.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 1.00 LSD 0.05 -- NS z NS NS NS NS NS Table 11. Other pest and beneficial in Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 9/30/2015 (number per 8 sweeps). Treatment Caterpillars Nabids White flies Grasshoppers Green Leafhoppers Tarnished Wasps Control 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Midwest Bio 0.00 0.00 2.75 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.00 0.25 Ag Safer soap 0.00 0.00 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regalia 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 LSD 0.05 NS z -- NS -- -- NS NS NS Table 12. Soybean staining in the Soybean Fertility experiment, Neely-Kinyon Farm, 8/18/15. Treatment Stained soybeans Control 0.54b z Midwest Bio Ag 0.98a Safer soap 0.66b Regalia 0.60b LSD 0.05 0.02556