A New Combinational Terminology for Geothermal Systems

Similar documents
EVALUATING HEAT FLOW AS A TOOL FOR ASSESSING GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES

Heat (& Mass) Transfer. conceptual models of heat transfer. large scale controls on fluid movement. distribution of vapor-saturated conditions

Overview of Indonesian Geothermal System

The Role of Magnetotellurics in Geothermal Exploration

NUMERICAL MODELING STUDY OF SIBAYAK GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR, NORTH SUMATRA, INDONESIA

Conceptual model for non-volcanic geothermal resources - examples from Tohoku Japan

Revisiting the Classification of Geothermal Resources

NATURE AND ASSESSMENT OF GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES

The Initial-State Geochemistry as a Baseline for Geochemical Monitoring at Ulubelu Geothermal Field, Indonesia

Numerical Simulation of Devolution and Evolution of Steam-Water Two-Phase Zone in a Fractured Geothermal Reservoir at Ogiri, Japan

The importance of understanding coupled processes in geothermal reservoirs. Thomas Driesner October 19, 2016

Determination of Geothermal Gradient in the Eastern Niger Delta Sedimentary Basin from Bottom Hole Temperatures

Geothermal Systems: Geologic Origins of a Vast Energy Resource

A Systematic Approach To Geothermal Power Classification

Chapter 13. Groundwater

Annað veldi ehf. Geothermal Provinces of Kenya

GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

GEOTHERMAL WELL SITING USING GIS: A CASE STUDY OF MENENGAI GEOTHERMAL PROSPECT

Geothermometer, Geoindicator and Isotope Monitoring in Lahendong Wells during

GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

Groundwater. (x 1000 km 3 /y) Reservoirs. Oceans Cover >70% of Surface. Groundwater and the. Hydrologic Cycle

Introduction to Geothermal Energy

HEAT TRANSFER IN A LOW ENTHALPY GEOTHERMAL WELL

Geochemical Characteristics of Reservoir Fluid from NW-Sabalan Geothermal Field, Iran


Geothermal Exploration in Eritrea

Groundwater. (x 1000 km 3 /y) Oceans Cover >70% of Surface. Groundwater and the. Hydrologic Cycle

MODELING AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TWO-PHASE GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR AT OGIRI, KYUSHU, JAPAN

GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT SITE SELECTION USING GIS IN SABALAN AREA, NW IRAN

GIS INTEGRATION METHIOD FOR GEOTHERMAL POWER PLANT SITEING IN SABALAN AREA, NW IRAN

Keywords: geophysics field camp, low to moderate, temperature, geothermal system, Mt Pancar, Indonesia

BULLS-EYE! - SIMPLE RESISTIVITY IMAGING TO RELIABLY LOCATE THE GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

GeothermEx, Inc. GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FOR THE SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION HOLE PROGRAM, KILAUEA EAST RIFT ZONE, HAWAII TASK 1 REPORT

DIRECT USE RESERVOIR MODELS HOW WE THINK THEY WORK. Gene Culver, Associate Director

Geothermal chance for success study in Upper Permian and Triassic carbonate reservoirs

Chapter 14: Groundwater. Fig 14.5b

THERMAL THERMAL AND AND RHEOLOGIC SIGNATURES OF

40 th Anniversary Chemical Characteristics of Geothermal Fluids in Jiaodong Peninsula, Shandong, China. Tingting Zheng Student UNU GTP

THERMAL ENERGY RECOVERY FROM ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL FROM DEEP, HIGH-TEMPERATURE RESOURCES

Belgian Geological data for deep geothermal Energy

GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF ST. KITTS AND NEVIS ISLANDS

Numerical Simulation Study of the Mori Geothermal Field, Japan

Distribution of Overpressure and its Prediction in Saurashtra Dahanu Block, Western Offshore Basin, India*

Mark S. Nordberg Geology and Groundwater Investigations Section North Central Region Office California Department of Water Resources

TWO DIFFERENT ROLES OF FRACTURES IN GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT

TEMPERATURE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM *.BY. Roger F. Harrison Salt Lake City, Utah. C; K. Blair

12. The diagram below shows the collision of an oceanic plate and a continental plate.

Geothermal Potential Assessment in Northern Rwanda

Japan Engineering Consultants, Inc., Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization,Tokyo, Japan

B. T. Brady, M. S. Bedinger, John Mikels, William H. Langer, and Deborah A. Mulvihill

Preparation for a New Power Plant in the Hengill Geothermal Area, Iceland

Lab 9: Petroleum and groundwater

GEOTHERMAL WELL TARGET APPROACHES IN THE EXPLORATION STAGE

TAKE HOME EXAM 8R - Geology

APPLICATION OF GEOPHYSICS TO GEOTHERMAL ENERGY EXPLORATION AND MONITORING OF ITS EXPLOITATION

INTERPRETATION OF INTERFERENCE EFFECTS IN THREE PRODUCTION WELLS IN THE KAWERAU GEOTHERMAL FIELD, NEW ZEALAND. Lynell Stevens and Kevin J Koorey

Course Syllabus (Contents Part 8) Geothermal Energy

LIGO sees binary neutron star merger on August 17, 2017

INTERGRATED GEOPHYSICAL METHODS USED TO SITE HIGH PRODUCER GEOTHERMAL WELLS

WELL DATA ANALYSIS AND VOLUMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF THE SOL DE MAÑANA GEOTHERMAL FIELD, BOLIVIA

Applicability of GEOFRAC to model a geothermal reservoir: a case study

CO 2 and heat fluxes in the Apennines, Italy

DATA ACQUISITION METHODS FOR GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION AND THE SITING OF WATER SUPPLY WELLS

MODELLING OF CONDITIONS CLOSE TO GEOTHERMAL HEAT SOURCES

RESERVOIR MODELING OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY PRODUCTION FROM STRATIGRAPHIC RESERVOIRS IN THE GREAT BASIN

HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER PROCESSES AFTER 1995 PHREATIC ERUPTION OF KUJU VOLCANO, CENTRAL KYUSHU, JAPAN

FLUID STRATIGRAPHY OF THE COSO GEOTHERMAL RESERVOIR

Taller de Geotermica en Mexico Geothermal Energy Current Technologies

THE GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF BILIRAN ISLAND, PHILIPPINES

Imaging Reservoir Structure of Mt. Pancar Geothermal Prospect Using Audio-Frequency Magnetotelluric (AMT) and Gravity Technology

Ann Moulding and Tom Brikowski University of Texas at Dallas, Department of Geosciences

GEOTHERMAL RESOURCE CONCEPTUAL MODELS USING SURFACE EXPLORATION DATA

Integrated Geophysical Model for Suswa Geothermal Prospect using Resistivity, Seismics and Gravity Survey Data in Kenya

TRANSTHERMAL. Geothermal potential study at the trans-border region of Austria and Slovenia regarding thermal and hydrological aspects. Goetzl G.

Bog Hot Valley. (updated 2012)

Geology : Embedded Inquiry

RECHARGE ELEVATION OF HOT SPRING STUDY IN THE MT

Metamorphism / Metamorphic Rocks

GEOTHERMAL BOREHOLE INVESTIGATIONS DURING AND AFTER DRILLING

TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION AND CONCEPTUAL RESERVOIR MODEL FOR GEOTHERMAL FIELDS IN AND AROUND THE CITY OF REYKJAVÍK, ICELAND

SUB-SURFACE GEOLOGY AND HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION OF WELLS LA-9D AND LA-10D OF ALUTO LANGANO GEOTHERMAL FIELD, ETHIOPIA

NUMERICAL MODELLING OF THE KAMOJANG GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM, INDONESIA

Hydraulic Characteristics of the Basel 1 Enhanced Geothermal System

GEOPHYSICAL CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE SAN VICENTE GEOTHERMAL AREA, EL SALVADOR

From Punchbowl to Panum: Long Valley Volcanism and the Mono-Inyo Crater Chain

HDR/EGS POTENTIAL OF THE VILKYCIAI AREA, WEST LITHUANIA

GEOCHEMISTRY OF RWENZORI HOT SPRINGS. Vincent Kato Department of Geological Survey and Mines, Entebbe, Uganda

Opportunities for Geothermal Development Created by New Technologies S2-1-2

Soils, Hydrogeology, and Aquifer Properties. Philip B. Bedient 2006 Rice University

HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION IN ACTIVE GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS A CASE STUDY OF OLKARIA DOMES

Ping Cheng Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

Geophysics for Geothermal Exploration

Land subsidence due to groundwater withdrawal in Hanoi, Vietnam

Section 10.1 The Nature of Volcanic Eruptions This section discusses volcanic eruptions, types of volcanoes, and other volcanic landforms.

Essentials of Geology, 11e

Chapter 2: Plate Tectonics: A Unifying Theory

Estimation of fracture porosity and permeability using radon as a tracer

Estimation of Pore Pressure from Well logs: A theoretical analysis and Case Study from an Offshore Basin, North Sea

DYNAMIC MODELLING OF GEOTHERMAL SYSTEMS

Activity Submitted by Tim Schroeder, Bennington College,

Transcription:

International Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 4, 43-48 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.41005 Published Online January 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg) A New Combinational Terminology for Geothermal Systems Mohammad Rezaie, Hamid Aghajani * Faculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran Email: * haghajani@shahroodut.ac.ir, * aghajani_hamid@yahoo.com Received September 27, 2012; revised November 2, 2012; accepted December 5, 2012 ABSTRACT A geothermal resource can be defined as a reservoir inside the Earth from which heat can be extracted economically. Geothermal resources are classified on the basis of different aspects, such as heat source, heat transfer, reservoir temperature, physical state, commercial utilization and geological settings. Unfortunately most of the current classifications that are used for geothermal systems are not complete. So, a combinational terminology of geological and temperature-based classifications would be more complete. This terminology can explain all geological situations, temperature and physical state of geothermal reservoir altogether. According to geological settings, in combinational terminology (from left to right), the class of geothermal resource s name would be placed at first, then the physical state of reservoir (Liquid-dominated or Two-phase or Vapor-dominated) would be written and finally the class of the geothermal reservoir which is related to its temperature, is written. Keywords: Geothermal Systems; Classification; Combinational Terminology; Geothermal Resource; Component 1. Introduction Geothermal energy is a clean and renewable source of energy that recently has been used. Geothermal energy is the natural heat which is stored in the rocks and water within the Earth [1]. And a geothermal resource can be defined as a reservoir inside the Earth from which heat can be extracted economically and utilized for generating electric power or any other suitable industrial, agricultural or domestic application [2]. Resource classification has a key role in the characterization, assessment and development of energy resources, including geothermal energy, because Stakeholders at all levels of government, within the geothermal industry, and among the general public need to be able to use and understand consistent terminology when addressing geothermal resource issues [3]. Geothermal resources are classified on the basis of different aspects, such as heat source, heat transfer, reservoir temperature, physical state, commercial utilization and geological settings [3,4]. However, most of time, geothermal resources are classified and got a name with respect to their geological setting [2,4-7] and their temperature [8-11]. Classification of geothermal systems according to their nature and geological settings is very important why geologic setting of a geothermal system has a fundamental effect on the potential temperature, fluid composition, * Corresponding author. and reservoir characteristics [3]. There are some similarities among current different methods for naming and classification of geothermal systems on the bases of their geology. There are also some differences. Classification of geothermal systems according to their temperature is economically important why our final target is extraction of heat from geothermal reservoir. But there is no general agreement on the temperature ranges used and Classification of a geothermal resource by its reservoir fluid temperature is ambiguous [12]. Unfortunately, almost all of geothermal classifications and terminologies do not encompass both geology and temperature. In this paper we will propose a combinational terminology for geothermal systems that cover both of geology and temperature which are related to them. For this reason first we will briefly explain the geology of geothermal systems, then we will classify them on basis of their geological settings. Later, we will review some of classifications of geothermal systems based on their temperature and choose one of them. Then, we propose a combinational terminology for geothermal systems. Finally, we will term Berlín geothermal field by this methodology as a case study. 2. Geology of Geothermal Systems Geothermal field is defined geographically, usually indicating an area of geothermal activity on the surface of the earth. In cases which there is no surface activity, this

44 M. REZAIE, H. AGHAJANI term may be used to indicate the area at the surface corresponding to the geothermal reservoir below. Geothermal system refers to all parts of the hydrological system involved, including the recharge zone, all subsurface parts and the outflow of the system. Geothermal reservoir indicates the hot and permeable part of a geothermal system that may be directly exploited. For spontaneous discharge to be possible, geothermal reservoirs must also be pressurized, either artesian or through boiling [4]. A geological setting which a geothermal reservoir is to be found in it can vary widely. The largest geothermal fields currently under exploitation occur in rocks that range from limestone to shale, volcanic rock and granite. Volcanic rocks are probably the most common single rock type in which reservoirs occur. Rather than being identified with a specific lithology, geothermal reservoirs are more closely associated with heat flow systems [13]. Geothermal systems are commonly associated with areas of young Tectonism and volcanism (mainly along active plate margins and interpolate hot spots) than stable cratonic regions [1]. An ideal geothermal system (Figure 1) would consist of: 1) a large source of heat, 2) a reservoir which accumulates heat, 3) a barrier (cap rock) to hold the accumulated heat, and 4) groundwater (working fluid) for transporting the heat. 3. Classification of Geothermal Resources on the Bases of Their Nature and Geology Geothermal systems can be subdivided, based on their heat transfer regimes and geological settings, into two broad categories: 1) Convective Systems, 2) Conductive Systems [6]. Convective geothermal systems are determined by natural circulation of working fluid [14]. These convective systems have two basic classes convective systems depending on the source of the thermal energy: volcanic and non-volcanic. A volcanic convective system drives its thermal energy from a convecting magma body [7]. The heat sources for such systems are hot intrusions or magma. They are most often situated inside, or close to, volcanic complexes such as calderas, most of them at plate boundaries but some in hot spot areas. Permeable fractures and fault zones mostly control the flow of water in volcanic systems [4]. A non-volcanic convective system drives its thermal energy from meteoric water that has heated up by deep circulation in high heat flow areas of the earth; there is no magma body associated with such a system [7]. Conductive geothermal systems can be characterized by a thermal regime due to conduction alone. The working fluid can be present or should be supplied in these systems. Convective circulation is prohibited because of low temperature contrast or low permeability [14]. There are three classes in these systems: 1) Sedimentary systems, 2) Geo-pressured systems, 3) Hot dry rock (HDR) or enhanced (engineered) geothermal systems (EGS). Sedimentary systems could be found in many of the major sedimentary basins of the world. These systems become to existence because of the occurrence of permeable sedimentary layers at great depths (>1 km) and Rain Overburden Reservoir Cap rock Convection current Recharge area Aquifer Bedrock Conductive heat Magmatic Intrusion Figure 1. A conceptual model of an ideal geothermal system [1].

M. REZAIE, H. AGHAJANI 45 above average geothermal gradients (>30 C/km) (Figure 2). These systems are conductive in nature rather than convective, even though fractures and faults play a role in some cases [4]. The sedimentary systems could be seen in the Madison Formation of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Wyoming area of the northern United States and the Pannonian Basin of central Europe where it has been used extensively in Hungary [15]. Geo-pressured systems occur in basin environments where deeply buried fluids contained in permeable sedimentary rocks which are warmed in a normal or enhanced geothermal gradient by their great burial depth. The fluids are tightly confined by surrounding impermeable rock and their pressure is much greater than hydrostatic [15]. Hot dry rock (HDR) or enhanced (engineered) geothermal systems (EGS) are volumes of rock that have been heated up by volcanism or abnormally high heat flow. They have low permeability or are virtually impermeable. Therefore, they cannot be exploited easily. An EGS is defined as a man-made reservoir which created by artificial fracturing of impermeable or very low permeable rock through wells. Our classification based on heat transfer regimes and geological settings is summarized in Table 1. 4. Classification on the Bases of Temperature and Thermodynamic Another important issue in assessing and terminology of geothermal systems is temperature properties of geother- mal reservoir. So it must have a key role in classification of geothermal systems. Geothermal systems and reservoirs can be classified on the basis of their temperature into two, three or more classes. In each case the temperature/enthalpy boundaries are significant in either a thermodynamic or an economic utilization context [3] (Figure 3). For example geothermal systems and reservoirs are classified on the basis of their enthalpy into Low-enthalpy geothermal systems and High-enthalpy geothermal systems. Low-enthalpy geothermal systems which their reservoir fluid enthalpies are less than 800 kj/kg and corresponding to temperatures less than about 190 C. High-enthalpy geothermal systems which their reservoir fluid enthalpies are greater than 800 kj/kg [17]. And in USGS assessments, geothermal systems are divided into three temperature classes: low-temperature (<90 C), moderate-temperature (90 C to 150 C), and high-temperature (>150 C) [5,11,18]. There is another classification that has proposed by Lee (2001). He has proposed that geothermal resources can be classified as low, medium and high quality resources with reference to their specific energy indices. Sanyal (2005) has proposed a classification in which geothermal resources can be classified into seven categories based on temperature: non-electrical grade (<100 C), very low temperature (100 C to <150 C), low temperature (150 C to 190 C), moderate temperature (190 C to <230 C), high temperature (230 C to <300 C), ultrahigh temperature (>300 C), and steam fields (approximately 240 C with steam as the only mobile phase). Recharge Geothermal wells Thermal Spring 0 1 2 3 30 C km 60 C Normal Earth Heat Flow Sandstone Shale Conglomerate Basement Crystalline Rock 30 C Isotherm Figure 2. Sedimentary geothermal system [16]. Table 1. Geothermal resource types. According to heat transfer regimes Convective Conductive According to geological settings Volcanic Non-Volcanic Sedimentary systems Geo-pressured systems HDR or EGS systems

46 M. REZAIE, H. AGHAJANI Figure 3. Classifications of geothermal resources by temperature [3]. Here we will use Synal s classification in our combinational terminology because temperature ranges are smaller and also this classification is based not only on temperature but also according to a set of additional attributes that are important for practical utilization of geothermal energy. 5. Combinational Terminology for Geothermal Resources Unfortunately most of current classifications that are used for geothermal systems are not complete. So a combinational terminology from geological and temperature based classifications can be more complete. This terminology can explain all geological situations, temperature and physical state of geothermal reservoir altogether. At the beginning, we have to determine classes of a geothermal system according to its temperature and geological setting. The physical state of the fluid that exists in it should be determined, too. According to geological settings, in combinational terminology (from left to right), the class of geothermal resource s name from Table 1 would be placed at first, then the physical state of reservoir (Liquid-dominated or Two-phase or Vapor-dominated) would be written and finally the class of the geothermal reservoir which is related to its temperature from last column in Figure 3, is written (Figure 4). Suppose that there is a volcanic geothermal system and is vapor-dominated and the temperature of its reservoir is about 260 C. According to the combinational terminology we can call it as: volcanic vapor-dominated high temperature geothermal system. It is clear that this Class according to geological setting Physical state of reservoir Class according to temperature Figure 4. combinational term for geothermal resources. name encompasses geology, physical state and temperature of this geothermal system and can be a good definition for this geothermal system. This terminology encompasses both the fundamentally geological nature of geothermal resources and almost the practical technological and economic aspects of resource exploitation while remaining understandable to the broad community of non-experts and experts. 6. Case study: Berlín Geothermal Field, El Salvador The Berlín geothermal field is one of the geothermal fields in El Salvador. It is located 110 km east of San Salvador, the capital City, in the District of Usulutan, near Berlín City. This geothermal field is located on the northern flank of the Berlín-Tecapa volcanic complex, inside a system of faults in the southern part of the eastwest oriented Central American graben. The Berlín-Tecapa volcanic complex is formed by the caldera of the Berlín strata volcano, and composed of a series of peripheral volcanic cones that expelled andesitic lava and scoria that emerged around the craters in the southeast part of the old Berlín volcano caldera [19]. According to

M. REZAIE, H. AGHAJANI 47 Table 2. Classification of Berlín geothermal system by different methods. Classification Geology Physical state of water USGS (1987) Enthalpy [17] Sanyal (2005) Combinational terminology available information, the field s heat resource is located underneath the Berlín caldera with an up flow coming from the south part of the caldera; the hot fluid flows laterally north/northeast along the graben faults. The Berlín geothermal field is a liquid-dominated system with temperatures in the range of 280 C - 300 C according to measured temperatures in the production wells. The enthalpy varies from 1200 to 1400 kj/kg, with a steam fraction of 20% - 30% at 11.5 bars, a separation pressure. The production wells in the Berlín geothermal field have been drilled to a depth between 1000 and 2600 m, and the reinjection wells to a depth of 500-2500 m. The elevation of the Berlín geothermal field ranges between 445 m a.s.l. in the reinjection area and 1080 m a.s.l. in the production area [20]. So by this information and according to this paper, we can classify Berlín geothermal system (Table 2). So according to combinational terminology, we can call Berlín geothermal system as a volcanic liquid dominated high temperature geothermal system. This name can explain the Berlín geothermal field, briefly and encompasses geology, physical state and temperature of this geothermal system which are important in assessing it. 7. Conclusion Terminology of a geothermal system is very important in assessment of geothermal resources. The terminology must be understandable and reflects geology and economical aspect of the geothermal system. Temperature has a key role in economy of geothermal resources. Therefore, it is used for classification and terminology of geothermal systems. Current terms and classifications which are used for geothermal systems are not comprehensive and so not encompass geology and temperature of geothermal resources. So a combinational terminology can be a good substitute for them. This new terminology constitutes from three parts, from left to right, geological class of geothermal system (from Table 1), physical state of pore water in reservoir, and temperature class of geothermal system (from Figure 3). This terminology looks more comprehensive. Class Volcanic geothermal system Liquid-dominated geothermal system High temperature geothermal system High enthalpy geothermal system High temperature geothermal system Volcanic liquid dominated high temperature geothermal system REFERENCES [1] M. A. Meju, Geoelectromagnetic Exploration for Natural Resources: Models, Case Studies and Challenges, Surveys in Geophysics, Vol. 23, No. 2-3, 2002, pp.133-205. doi:10.1023/a:1015052419222 [2] H. Gupta and S. Roy, Geothermal Energy: An Alternative Resource for the 21st Century, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007. [3] C. F. Williams, M. J. Reed and A. F. Anderson, Updating the Classification of Geothermal Resources, Proceedings of Thirty-Sixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, 31 January-2 February 2011. [4] K. Saemundsson, G. Axelsson and B. Steingrímsson Geothermal Systems in Global Perspective, Short Course on Surface Exploration for Geothermal Resources, El Salvador, 2009. [5] D. E. White and D. L. Williams, Assessment of Geothermal Resources of the United States, US Geological Survey Circular 726, 1975, p. 155. [6] L. Rybach, Geothermal Systems, Conductive Heat Flow, Geothermal Anomalies, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, 1981. [7] S. K. Sanyal, Future of Geothermal Energy, Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford, 12-14 December 2010, pp. 1-3. [8] G. Bödvarsson, Physical Characteristics of Natural Heat Sources in Iceland, Proceeding of UN Conference on New Sources of Energy, Vol. 2, 1964, pp. 82-89. [9] L. P. J. Muffler and R. Cataldi, Methods for Regional Assessment of Geothermal Resources, Geothermics, Vol. 7, No. 2-4, 1978, pp. 53-89. doi:10.1016/0375-6505(78)90002-0 [10] S. K. Sanyal, Classification of Geothermal Systems; A Possible Scheme, Proceedings of Thirtieth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, 31 January-2 February 2005, pp. 85-88. [11] C. F. Williams, M. J. Reed and R. H. Mariner, A Review of Methods Applied by the US Geological Survey in the Assessment of Identified Geothermal Resources, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 1296, 2008. [12] K. C. Lee, Classification of Geothermal Resources by Energy, Geothermics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2001, pp. 431-442. doi:10.1016/s0375-6505(00)00056-0 [13] A. Manzella, Geophysical Methods in Geothermal Ex-

48 M. REZAIE, H. AGHAJANI ploration (Lecture Notes), Italian National Research Council, International Institute for Geothermal Research, Pisa, 2000. [14] H. Wibowo, Spatial Data Analysis and Integration for Regional-Scale Geothermal Prospectivity Mapping, West Java, Indonesia, Master s Thesis, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Enschede, Enschede, 2006. [15] J. W. Lund, Characteristics, Development and Utilization of Geothermal Resources, GHC Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2007, pp. 1-9. [16] D. N. Anderson and J. W. Lund, Eds., Direct Utilization of Geothermal Energy: A Technical Handbook, Special Report No. 7, Geothermal Resources Council, Davis, 1979. doi:10.2172/6707209 [17] G. Axelsson and E. Gunnlaugsson, Geothermal Utiliza- tion, Management and Monitoring, in Long-Term Monitoring of High- and Low-Enthalpy Fields under Exploitation, World Geothermal Congress: Short Course, Morioka, 2000, pp. 3-10. [18] L. P. J. Muffler, Assessment of Geothermal Resources of the United States, US Geological Survey Circular Report 790, 1979. [19] H. Correia, H. Jacobo, F. Castellanos, J. Tenorio, S. Handal and P. Santos, Synthesis of Geo-Scientific Information of a Conceptual Model of Berlín Geothermal Field, CEL, 1996. [20] V. A. Rodríguez, Analysis of Temperature and Pressure Measurements and Production Data for Berlín Geothermal Field, Geothermal Training in Iceland, UNU-GTP, Iceland, 2005, pp. 297-332.