The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras

Similar documents
WHAT IS K-HOMOLOGY? Paul Baum Penn State. Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA. April 2, 2014

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.

The Spinor Representation

Factorization Algebras Associated to the (2, 0) Theory IV. Kevin Costello Notes by Qiaochu Yuan

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Atiyah-Singer Revisited

From Dirac operator to supermanifolds and supersymmetries PAI DYGEST Meeting

Overview of Atiyah-Singer Index Theory

Fractional Index Theory

On SL 2 (Z) and Topology

Introduction to Index Theory. Elmar Schrohe Institut für Analysis

Lecture 11: Clifford algebras

A users guide to K-theory

Introduction to supersymmetry

V = 1 2 (g ijχ i h j ) (2.4)

BRST and Dirac Cohomology

Elliptic Cohomology. Prospects in Mathematics Durham, December Sarah Whitehouse. University of Sheffield

10:30-12:00 (1) Elliptic Cohomology and Conformal Field Theories: An Introduction. (Prof. G. Laures) Example: Heat operator, Laplace operator.

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture

Geometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010

Unbounded KK-theory and KK-bordisms

Kasparov s operator K-theory and applications 4. Lafforgue s approach

On algebraic index theorems. Ryszard Nest. Introduction. The index theorem. Deformation quantization and Gelfand Fuks. Lie algebra theorem

Generalized complex geometry and topological sigma-models

Gauge Theory and Mirror Symmetry

An Introduction to the Stolz-Teichner Program

The Riemann-Roch Theorem

Two simple ideas from calculus applied to Riemannian geometry

Yasu Kawahigashi ( ) the University of Tokyo/Kavli IPMU (WPI) Kyoto, July 2013

The Dirac operator on quantum SU(2)

Alternative mechanism to SUSY (Conservative extensions of the Poincaré group)

Positive scalar curvature, higher rho invariants and localization algebras

Quantizations and classical non-commutative non-associative algebras

Three Applications of Topology to Physics

Lecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude

Invariance of tautological equations

When 2 and 3 are invertible in A, L A is the scheme

CONFORMAL FIELD THEORIES

K-amenability and the Baum-Connes

Borcherds proof of the moonshine conjecture

Alternative mechanism to SUSY

Mathematical Research Letters 2, (1995) A VANISHING THEOREM FOR SEIBERG-WITTEN INVARIANTS. Shuguang Wang

where P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation

K-Homology, Assembly and Rigidity Theorems for Relative Eta Invariants

KR-theory. Jean-Louis Tu. Lyon, septembre Université de Lorraine France. IECL, UMR 7502 du CNRS

Introduction to Vertex Algebras

Quaternionic Complexes

Deep and surprising relations between physics and geometry

EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.

Remarks on Chern-Simons Theory. Dan Freed University of Texas at Austin

Quantising proper actions on Spin c -manifolds

Vertex operator algebras, minimal models, and modular linear differential equations of order 4

Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

Virasoro and Kac-Moody Algebra

Conformal field theory, vertex operator algebras and operator algebras

SPECTRAL ASYMMETRY AND RIEMANNIAN GEOMETRY

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

NOTES ON ATIYAH S TQFT S

From symplectic to spin geometry

Exercises on characteristic classes

Contents. Preface...VII. Introduction... 1

Meromorphic open-string vertex algebras and Riemannian manifolds

φ µ = g µν φ ν. p µ = 1g 1 4 φ µg 1 4,

The Dirac Equation. Topic 3 Spinors, Fermion Fields, Dirac Fields Lecture 13

Singularities, Root Systems, and W-Algebras

Lecture A2. conformal field theory

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 6 Feb 1998

The Riemann-Roch Theorem

Possible Advanced Topics Course

Chern-Simons gauge theory The Chern-Simons (CS) gauge theory in three dimensions is defined by the action,

Three Descriptions of the Cohomology of Bun G (X) (Lecture 4)

Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups

Dirac Operator. Texas A&M University College Station, Texas, USA. Paul Baum Penn State. March 31, 2014

CHARACTERISTIC CLASSES

AN INTRODUCTION TO KK-THEORY

Quantising noncompact Spin c -manifolds

Topics in Geometry: Mirror Symmetry

Outline of the Seminar Topics on elliptic curves Saarbrücken,

Conformal field theory in the sense of Segal, modified for a supersymmetric context

HECKE OPERATORS AS OPERATIONS IN ELLIPTIC COHOMOLOGY Andrew Baker Department of Mathematics, Manchester University, Manchester M13 9PL

Topics in Representation Theory: Fourier Analysis and the Peter Weyl Theorem

On the Equivalence of Geometric and Analytic K-Homology

Equivariant geometric K-homology with coefficients. Michael Walter

Anton M. Zeitlin. Columbia University, Department of Mathematics. Super-Teichmüller theory. Anton Zeitlin. Outline. Introduction. Cast of characters

Two-sided multiplications and phantom line bundles

Quantization of the open string on exact plane waves and non-commutative wave fronts

The Based Loop Group of SU(2) Lisa Jeffrey. Department of Mathematics University of Toronto. Joint work with Megumi Harada and Paul Selick

Higgs Bundles and Character Varieties

IN POSITIVE CHARACTERISTICS: 3. Modular varieties with Hecke symmetries. 7. Foliation and a conjecture of Oort

Einstein-Hilbert action on Connes-Landi noncommutative manifolds

Automorphisms and twisted forms of Lie conformal superalgebras

Deformation groupoids and index theory

Moduli spaces of graphs and homology operations on loop spaces of manifolds

Equivariant Toeplitz index

arxiv: v1 [math.kt] 31 Mar 2011

Invariants from noncommutative index theory for homotopy equivalences

Geometry of Conformal Field Theory

Supersymmetric field theories and generalized cohomology

INFINITE DIMENSIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS

Transcription:

The Dirac-Ramond operator and vertex algebras Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster cvoigt@math.uni-muenster.de http://wwwmath.uni-muenster.de/reine/u/cvoigt/ Vanderbilt May 11, 2011

Kasparov theory

Kasparov theory Definition Let A and B be (separable, ungraded) C -algebras. A Kasparov A-B-module (E, φ, F ) consists of a (countably generated) graded Hilbert B-module E = E 0 E 1 a graded -homomorphism φ : A L(E) an odd operator F L(E) such that [F, φ(a)], φ(a)(f 2 1), φ(a)(f F ) are contained in K(E) for all a A.

Kasparov theory

Kasparov theory Definition (Kasparov) Let A and B be C -algebras. The group KK(A, B) is the set of homotopy classes of Kasparov A-B-modules.

Kasparov theory Definition (Kasparov) Let A and B be C -algebras. The group KK(A, B) is the set of homotopy classes of Kasparov A-B-modules. KK(A, B) is a bifunctor on the category of C -algebras with values in abelian groups, covariant in B and contravariant in A.

Kasparov theory Definition (Kasparov) Let A and B be C -algebras. The group KK(A, B) is the set of homotopy classes of Kasparov A-B-modules. KK(A, B) is a bifunctor on the category of C -algebras with values in abelian groups, covariant in B and contravariant in A. For a C -algebra A KK(C, A) is (isomorphic to) the K-theory of A KK(A, C) is the K-homology of A.

Kasparov theory Every -homomorphism f : A B determines an element [f ] = (B, f, 0) KK(A, B). Theorem (Kasparov) There exists an associative bilinear product KK(A, B) KK(B, C) KK(A, C), (x, y) x B y generalizing the composition of -homomorphisms.

Bott periodicity

Bott periodicity The Dirac-dual Dirac method of Atiyah-Kasparov consists in defining

Bott periodicity The Dirac-dual Dirac method of Atiyah-Kasparov consists in defining the Dirac element α KK(C 0 (R 2n ), C) the dual Dirac (Bott) element β KK(C, C 0 (R 2n ))

Bott periodicity The Dirac-dual Dirac method of Atiyah-Kasparov consists in defining the Dirac element α KK(C 0 (R 2n ), C) the dual Dirac (Bott) element β KK(C, C 0 (R 2n )) and proving Theorem (Bott periodicity) The elements α and β are mutually inverse. Hence KK(A C 0 (R 2n ), B) = KK(A, B) = KK(A, B C 0 (R 2n )) for all A and B.

The Dirac element

The Dirac element The Dirac element α = (H, φ, F ) in KK(C 0 (R 2n ), C) is given by

The Dirac element The Dirac element α = (H, φ, F ) in KK(C 0 (R 2n ), C) is given by the Hilbert space H = L 2 (R 2n ) S where S = S + S is the spinor representation of the Clifford algebra Cl 2n. the -homomorphism φ : C 0 (R 2n ) L(H) is the operator F L(H) is φ(f )(h σ) = fh σ. F = where D is the Dirac operator D 1 + D 2 D = 2n j=1 c(e j ) x j.

The dual-dirac element

The dual-dirac element The dual Dirac element β = (E, ψ, b) in KK(C, C 0 (R 2n )) is given by

The dual-dirac element The dual Dirac element β = (E, ψ, b) in KK(C, C 0 (R 2n )) is given by the Hilbert C 0 (R 2n )-module E = C 0 (R 2n ) S where again S = S + S are the spinors. the -homomorphism ψ : C L(E) determined by ψ(1) = id. the operator b L(E) = C b (R 2n, Cl 2n ) given by b(x) = for x = (x 1,..., x 2n ) R 2n. 2n j=1 x j 1 + x 2

Proof of Bott periodicity

Proof of Bott periodicity We have to show that α and β are mutually inverse.

Proof of Bott periodicity We have to show that α and β are mutually inverse. The Kasparov product β α KK(C, C) is represented by the Kasparov C-C-module given by

Proof of Bott periodicity We have to show that α and β are mutually inverse. The Kasparov product β α KK(C, C) is represented by the Kasparov C-C-module given by the graded Hilbert space L 2 (Λ (R 2n )) the left action of C by scalar multiplication an operator B L(L 2 (Λ (R 2n ))) essentially given by harmonic oscillators.

Proof of Bott periodicity We have to show that α and β are mutually inverse. The Kasparov product β α KK(C, C) is represented by the Kasparov C-C-module given by the graded Hilbert space L 2 (Λ (R 2n )) the left action of C by scalar multiplication an operator B L(L 2 (Λ (R 2n ))) essentially given by harmonic oscillators. One computes ind(b) = 1, and this implies β α = [id].

Proof of Bott periodicity We have to show that α and β are mutually inverse. The Kasparov product β α KK(C, C) is represented by the Kasparov C-C-module given by the graded Hilbert space L 2 (Λ (R 2n )) the left action of C by scalar multiplication an operator B L(L 2 (Λ (R 2n ))) essentially given by harmonic oscillators. One computes ind(b) = 1, and this implies β α = [id]. The equality α β = [id] in KK(C 0 (R 2n ), C 0 (R 2n )) follows from β α = [id] using Atiyah s rotation trick.

The Dirac element for general manifolds If M is a (even-dimensional complete Riemannian spin) manifold one obtains the Dirac element [D] = (H, φ, F ) in KK(C 0 (M), C). Here H = L 2 (M, S) are the L 2 -spinors on M, the -homomorphism φ : C 0 (M) L(H) is given by pointwise multiplication, the operator F L(H) is F = D 1 + D 2 where D is the Dirac operator on M.

Supersymmetric mechanics

Supersymmetric mechanics Consider the supersymmetric mechanical system given by the Lagrange density L(X ) = 1 2 g µν(x ) τ X µ DX ν dθdτ.

Supersymmetric mechanics Consider the supersymmetric mechanical system given by the Lagrange density L(X ) = 1 2 g µν(x ) τ X µ DX ν dθdτ. Here X : R 1 1 M describes a superparticle moving in the complete Riemannian (even-dimensional spin) manifold (M, g).

Supersymmetric mechanics Consider the supersymmetric mechanical system given by the Lagrange density L(X ) = 1 2 g µν(x ) τ X µ DX ν dθdτ. Here X : R 1 1 M describes a superparticle moving in the complete Riemannian (even-dimensional spin) manifold (M, g). The Lagrangian is supersymmetric, the generator of supersymmetry is given by the odd vector field satisfying Q 2 = τ. Q = θ + θ τ

Supersymmetric mechanics The Euler-Lagrange equation is τ DX = 0 and the solutions form a symplectic supermanifold which can be identified with the odd vector bundle π (ΠTM) over TM. Here π : TM M denotes the bundle projection.

Supersymmetric mechanics The Euler-Lagrange equation is τ DX = 0 and the solutions form a symplectic supermanifold which can be identified with the odd vector bundle π (ΠTM) over TM. Here π : TM M denotes the bundle projection. The algebra C (π (ΠTM)) of classical observables contains in particular the functions on M.

Supersymmetric mechanics The Euler-Lagrange equation is τ DX = 0 and the solutions form a symplectic supermanifold which can be identified with the odd vector bundle π (ΠTM) over TM. Here π : TM M denotes the bundle projection. The algebra C (π (ΠTM)) of classical observables contains in particular the functions on M. Canonical quantization of this system is tantamount to the construction of the Dirac element in KK(C 0 (M), C).

Quantization More precisely, canonical quantization yields

Quantization More precisely, canonical quantization yields the graded Hilbert space H = L 2 (M, S) of L 2 -spinors on M,

Quantization More precisely, canonical quantization yields the graded Hilbert space H = L 2 (M, S) of L 2 -spinors on M, the action of the observables in C 0 (M) on H by pointwise multiplication,

Quantization More precisely, canonical quantization yields the graded Hilbert space H = L 2 (M, S) of L 2 -spinors on M, the action of the observables in C 0 (M) on H by pointwise multiplication, the Dirac operator D acting on H as quantization of the supercharge Q,

Quantization More precisely, canonical quantization yields the graded Hilbert space H = L 2 (M, S) of L 2 -spinors on M, the action of the observables in C 0 (M) on H by pointwise multiplication, the Dirac operator D acting on H as quantization of the supercharge Q, the Laplace operator = D 2 as quantization of the Hamiltonian H.

Supersymmetric σ-models In physics, a σ-model is a field theory in which the elementary fields are maps from spacetime to a target space, often a Riemannian manifold.

Supersymmetric σ-models In physics, a σ-model is a field theory in which the elementary fields are maps from spacetime to a target space, often a Riemannian manifold. The above mechanical system can be viewed as a 0 + 1-dimensional supersymmetric σ-model with target space M;

Supersymmetric σ-models In physics, a σ-model is a field theory in which the elementary fields are maps from spacetime to a target space, often a Riemannian manifold. The above mechanical system can be viewed as a 0 + 1-dimensional supersymmetric σ-model with target space M; the underlying spacetime R 1 1 has zero space dimensions plus one (even) time dimension,

Supersymmetric σ-models In physics, a σ-model is a field theory in which the elementary fields are maps from spacetime to a target space, often a Riemannian manifold. The above mechanical system can be viewed as a 0 + 1-dimensional supersymmetric σ-model with target space M; the underlying spacetime R 1 1 has zero space dimensions plus one (even) time dimension, the dynamical variables are (super-) fields X : R 1 1 M.

Supersymmetric σ-models In physics, a σ-model is a field theory in which the elementary fields are maps from spacetime to a target space, often a Riemannian manifold. The above mechanical system can be viewed as a 0 + 1-dimensional supersymmetric σ-model with target space M; the underlying spacetime R 1 1 has zero space dimensions plus one (even) time dimension, the dynamical variables are (super-) fields X : R 1 1 M. What happens if we add one space dimension?

Supersymmetric σ-models There is a 1 + 1-dimensional supersymmetric σ-model with target M given by the Lagrangian where now X : R 2 1 M. L(X ) = g µν (X )(DX µ )( z X ν )dθdzdz Here z, z are (independent) coordinates on R 2 and θ is a Grassmann variable as before.

Supersymmetric σ-models There is a 1 + 1-dimensional supersymmetric σ-model with target M given by the Lagrangian where now X : R 2 1 M. L(X ) = g µν (X )(DX µ )( z X ν )dθdzdz Here z, z are (independent) coordinates on R 2 and θ is a Grassmann variable as before. Is there an analogue of a Kasparov module corresponding to this model?

Loop spaces and the Dirac-Ramond operator Heuristically, if M is a string manifold, the analogue of the Dirac cycle in Kasparov theory should encode the Dirac-Ramond operator on the loop space LM = C (S 1, M).

Loop spaces and the Dirac-Ramond operator Heuristically, if M is a string manifold, the analogue of the Dirac cycle in Kasparov theory should encode the Dirac-Ramond operator on the loop space LM = C (S 1, M). Formally, this is the operator Q = 2π 0 ( dσψ µ (σ) i acting on L 2 -spinors over LM. D DX µ (σ) + g µν(x ) X ν ) σ

Loop spaces and the Dirac-Ramond operator Heuristically, if M is a string manifold, the analogue of the Dirac cycle in Kasparov theory should encode the Dirac-Ramond operator on the loop space LM = C (S 1, M). Formally, this is the operator Q = 2π 0 ( dσψ µ (σ) i acting on L 2 -spinors over LM. D DX µ (σ) + g µν(x ) X ν ) σ But we want a homology theory for M - and not LM -

Loop spaces and the Dirac-Ramond operator Heuristically, if M is a string manifold, the analogue of the Dirac cycle in Kasparov theory should encode the Dirac-Ramond operator on the loop space LM = C (S 1, M). Formally, this is the operator Q = 2π 0 ( dσψ µ (σ) i acting on L 2 -spinors over LM. D DX µ (σ) + g µν(x ) X ν ) σ But we want a homology theory for M - and not LM - therefore we should work with the Dirac-Ramond operator on the normal bundle N M of M LM.

Loop spaces and the Dirac-Ramond operator Witten considered the (equivariant) index of Q by formally applying the equivariant index theorem with respect to the canonical S 1 -action on LM. This is the starting point for his interpretation of the elliptic genus.

Loop spaces and the Dirac-Ramond operator Witten considered the (equivariant) index of Q by formally applying the equivariant index theorem with respect to the canonical S 1 -action on LM. This is the starting point for his interpretation of the elliptic genus. All index theoretic information of Q is captured on the normal bundle N M.

Loop spaces and the Dirac-Ramond operator Witten considered the (equivariant) index of Q by formally applying the equivariant index theorem with respect to the canonical S 1 -action on LM. This is the starting point for his interpretation of the elliptic genus. All index theoretic information of Q is captured on the normal bundle N M. The Dirac-Ramond operator on N M is mathematically well-defined, it was used by Taubes in his proof of the Witten rigidity theorems.

The loop space LR 2n

The loop space LR 2n We expand an element v in LR 2n = C (S 1, R 2n ) into Fourier modes, v(t) = v 0 + v k e 2πitk + v k e 2πitk with v 0 R 2n and v k C 2n. k=1

The loop space LR 2n We expand an element v in LR 2n = C (S 1, R 2n ) into Fourier modes, v(t) = v 0 + v k e 2πitk + v k e 2πitk k=1 with v 0 R 2n and v k C 2n. This yields LR 2n R 2n C 2n q k k=1

The loop space LR 2n We expand an element v in LR 2n = C (S 1, R 2n ) into Fourier modes, v(t) = v 0 + v k e 2πitk + v k e 2πitk k=1 with v 0 R 2n and v k C 2n. This yields LR 2n R 2n C 2n q k k=1 A suitable algebra of smooth functions on this manifold is C c (R 2n ) S q k (C 2n ) S q l (C 2n ) k=1 l=1

Spinors for LR 2n

Spinors for LR 2n Write g = so(2n) and let ĝ be the associated affine algebra. The spinor representation of ĝ acts on the (Ramond) Fock space S = S Λ q m(c 2n ) m=1 where S = S + S are the complex spinors for R 2n.

Spinors for LR 2n Write g = so(2n) and let ĝ be the associated affine algebra. The spinor representation of ĝ acts on the (Ramond) Fock space S = S Λ q m(c 2n ) m=1 where S = S + S are the complex spinors for R 2n. The Hilbert space H of L 2 -spinors on LR 2n is a completion of C c (R 2n ) S q k (C 2n ) S Λ q m(c 2n ) S q l (C 2n ) k=1 m=1 l=1

The Dirac-Ramond operator for LR 2n

The Dirac-Ramond operator for LR 2n Formally, the Dirac-Ramond operator Q acting on H is Q = D + G 0

The Dirac-Ramond operator for LR 2n Formally, the Dirac-Ramond operator Q acting on H is where Q = D + G 0 the horizontal part D is the Dirac operator on R 2n coupled to the (trivial) infinite-dimensional vector bundle S q k (C 2n ) k=1 Λ q m(c 2n ) S q l (C 2n ) m=1 l=1

The Dirac-Ramond operator for LR 2n Formally, the Dirac-Ramond operator Q acting on H is where Q = D + G 0 the horizontal part D is the Dirac operator on R 2n coupled to the (trivial) infinite-dimensional vector bundle S q k (C 2n ) k=1 Λ q m(c 2n ) S q l (C 2n ) m=1 l=1 the vertical part G 0 anticommutes with D.

Further structure on the Hilbert space H

Further structure on the Hilbert space H On H there are natural commuting representations of the Virasoro algebra and the super-virasoro algebra.

Further structure on the Hilbert space H On H there are natural commuting representations of the Virasoro algebra and the super-virasoro algebra. The Virasoro algebra Vir is the Lie algebra with generators L k for k Z and C and relations for all k, l Z. [L k, L l ] = (k l)l k+l + δ k, l k 12 (k2 1)C [L k, C] = 0

Further structure on the Hilbert space H On H there are natural commuting representations of the Virasoro algebra and the super-virasoro algebra. The Virasoro algebra Vir is the Lie algebra with generators L k for k Z and C and relations for all k, l Z. [L k, L l ] = (k l)l k+l + δ k, l k 12 (k2 1)C [L k, C] = 0 Vir is a central extension of the Witt algebra, the Lie algebra of complex-valued polynomial vector fields on S 1.

Further structure on the Hilbert space H More precisely, there are (unbounded) operators L k, L k and G k for k Z acting in H satisfying the relations [L k, L l ] = (k l)l k+l + δ k, l k 12 (k2 1)c k [L k, L l ] = (k l)l k+l + δ k, l 12 (k2 1)c ( k [L k, G l ] = 2 l [L k, L l ] = 0, [G k, L l ] = 0 ) G k+l, [G k, G l ] = 2L k+l + c 3 with central charges c = 2n, c = 3n. ( k 2 1 ) δ k, l 4

Further structure on the Hilbert space H In conformal field theory, one works with the generating series L(z) = L k z k 2 k Z where z is a formal variable. L(z) = L k z k 2 k Z G(z) = G k z k 1 2 +Z k 3/2

Further structure on the Hilbert space H In conformal field theory, one works with the generating series L(z) = k Z where z is a formal variable. L k z k 2 L(z) = L k z k 2 k Z G(z) = G k z k 1 2 +Z k 3/2 These expressions can be viewed as operator-valued distributions on C \ {0} and are basic examples of vertex operators.

Vertex operators and vertex algebras

Vertex operators and vertex algebras Definition Let V be a vector space. A vertex operator on V is a series a(z) = n Z a (n) z n 1 End(V )[[z, z 1 ]] such that for all v V one has a (n) (v) = 0 for n 0.

Vertex operators and vertex algebras Definition Let V be a vector space. A vertex operator on V is a series a(z) = n Z a (n) z n 1 End(V )[[z, z 1 ]] such that for all v V one has a (n) (v) = 0 for n 0. Vertex operators cannot be multiplied in a simple fashion.

Vertex operators and vertex algebras Definition Let V be a vector space. A vertex operator on V is a series a(z) = n Z a (n) z n 1 End(V )[[z, z 1 ]] such that for all v V one has a (n) (v) = 0 for n 0. Vertex operators cannot be multiplied in a simple fashion. Vertex algebras axiomatize the algebra of vertex operators. They provide a rigorous mathematical framework for conformal field theory.

Vertex algebras

Vertex algebras Definition A vertex-c -algebra consists of a commutative C -algebra V(0) with unit Ω (vacuum) and a Hilbert V (0) -module V = n N 0 V (n) Write F(V) V for the algebraic direct sum of the spaces V (n). an antilinear involution : V V which preserves conformal weights and coincides on V(0) with the given involution. an element ω V(2) (conformal vector) satisfying ω = ω. a locally bounded linear map Y : F(V ) EndV(0) (F(V))[[z, z 1 ]] which maps v to the vertex operator Y (v, z) = v (n) z n 1 n= such that the following axioms are satisfied:

Vertex algebras (Vacuum axiom) One has Y (Ω, z) = id and Y (v, z)(ω) z=0 = v for all v F(V ). (Virasoro axiom) The Fourier coefficients Ln of Y (ω, z) satisfy n [L n, L m] = (n m)l n+m + δ n, m 12 (n2 1)c where c is the central charge of V. Moreover L 0 (v) = nv for v V (n). (Translation covariance) For all v F(V) one has [L 1, Y (v, z)] = z Y (v, z). (Locality) For all u, v V there exists N >> 0 such that (w z) N [Y (u, w), Y (v, z)] = 0. (Unitarity) For all v, u, w F(V) one has Y (v, z) u, w = u, Y (v, z)w where Y (v, z) = Y (e L 1 z ( z 2 ) L 0 (v ), z 1 ).

A (first attempt of a) definition of elliptic cycles

A (first attempt of a) definition of elliptic cycles Let A and B be separable C -algebras. An elliptic A-B-cycle consists of a N = 1 2 SUSY conformal vertex C -algebra V with dim(v (0) ) < a Z 2 -twisted Hilbert B-vertex module E over V a graded -homomorphism φ : A L(E) an odd homogeneous operator F L(E)

A (first attempt of a) definition of elliptic cycles

A (first attempt of a) definition of elliptic cycles These data are required to satisfy the following conditions. The operators [F, φ(a)], (F 2 1)φ(a), (F F )φ(a) are locally compact for all a A. The representation φ commutes strictly with all vertex operators. F commutes up to locally compact operators with the action of all holomorphic vertex operators. (Minimality) The vertex module E is cyclic. (Modular invariance) The character of (V, E) is modular invariant.

The corresponding homology theory Definition Let A and B be separable C -algebras. We write e(a, B) for the group of homotopy classes of elliptic A-B-cycles.

The corresponding homology theory Definition Let A and B be separable C -algebras. We write e(a, B) for the group of homotopy classes of elliptic A-B-cycles. Theorem There exists an associative bilinear product e(a, B) e(b, C) e(a, C) generalizing the composition of -homomorphisms.

The corresponding homology theory Definition Let A and B be separable C -algebras. We write e(a, B) for the group of homotopy classes of elliptic A-B-cycles. Theorem There exists an associative bilinear product e(a, B) e(b, C) e(a, C) generalizing the composition of -homomorphisms. There is a natural ring homomorphism T : e (C, C) M (Z) where M (Z) is the ring of weakly meromorphic integral modular forms.

Modular forms

Modular forms SL 2 (Z) acts on the upper half plane H = {τ C Im(τ) > 0} by ( ) a b (τ) = aτ + b c d cτ + d.

Modular forms SL 2 (Z) acts on the upper half plane H = {τ C Im(τ) > 0} by ( ) a b (τ) = aτ + b c d cτ + d. Definition Let k Z. A (weakly meromorphic) modular form of weight k is a holomorphic function f : H C such that (( ) ) a b f (τ) = (cτ + d) k f (τ) c d and f is meromorphic at i, f (q) = n= N a n q n, q = e 2πiτ.

Modular forms A modular form is integral if all its Fourier coefficients are integers.

Modular forms A modular form is integral if all its Fourier coefficients are integers. The ring of (weakly meromorphic) integral modular forms is M (Z) = Z[E 4, E 6,, 1 ]/(E4 3 E6 2 1728 ) where E 4, E 6 are (normalized) Eisenstein series and = q (1 q k ) = η(q) 24 is the modular discriminant. k=1

An analogue of Bott periodicity for e-theory

An analogue of Bott periodicity for e-theory The Dirac-Ramond operator for R n defines an element α e(c 0 (R n ), C) iff the dimension n is a multiple of 24.

An analogue of Bott periodicity for e-theory The Dirac-Ramond operator for R n defines an element α e(c 0 (R n ), C) iff the dimension n is a multiple of 24. Theorem The element α e(c 0 (R n ), C) is invertible, and there are natural isomorphisms for all A, B. e(c 0 (R 24 ) A, B) = e(a, B) = e(a, C 0 (R 24 ) B) Under the map e (C, C) M (Z), the Dirac-Ramond element α for R 24 corresponds to 1.