Seismic hazard modeling for Bulgaria D. Solakov, S. Simeonova

Similar documents
Hazard Feedback using the. current GMPEs for DCPP. Nick Gregor. PG&E DCPP SSHAC Study. SWUS GMC Workshop 2 October 22, 2013

Ground Motion Prediction Equation Hazard Sensitivity Results for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Site (PVNGS)

RECORD OF REVISIONS. Page 2 of 17 GEO. DCPP.TR.14.06, Rev. 0

The Ranges of Uncertainty among the Use of NGA-West1 and NGA-West 2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations

Usability of the Next Generation Attenuation Equations for Seismic Hazard Assessment in Malaysia

Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Seismic Design

Non-Ergodic Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analyses

Eleventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Integrating Science, Engineering & Policy June 25-29, 2018 Los Angeles, California

Occurrence of negative epsilon in seismic hazard analysis deaggregation, and its impact on target spectra computation

DIRECT HAZARD ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRA

VALIDATION AGAINST NGA EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SIMULATED MOTIONS FOR M7.8 RUPTURE OF SAN ANDREAS FAULT

Seismic Displacement Demands for Performance-Based Design and Rehabilitation of Structures in North America

Vertical to Horizontal (V/H) Ratios for Large Megathrust Subduction Zone Earthquakes

Comment on Why Do Modern Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Analyses Often Lead to Increased Hazard Estimates? by Julian J. Bommer and Norman A.

Kappa for Candidate GMPEs

Updated NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Active Tectonic Regions Worldwide

NGA-Subduction: Development of the Largest Ground Motion Database for Subduction Events

Single-Station Phi Using NGA-West2 Data

Updating the Chiou and YoungsNGAModel: Regionalization of Anelastic Attenuation

The effect of bounds on magnitude, source-to-site distance and site condition in PSHA-based ground motion selection

Introduction to Strong Motion Seismology. Norm Abrahamson Pacific Gas & Electric Company SSA/EERI Tutorial 4/21/06

Development of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for International Sites, Challenges and Guidelines

Damping Scaling of Response Spectra for Shallow CCCCCCCCCrustalstallPaper Crustal Earthquakes in Active Tectonic Title Line Regions 1 e 2

Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand

Uniform Hazard Spectrum(UHS) for performance based seismic design

Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) from a Global Dataset: The PEER NGA Equations

Beyond Sa GMRotI : Conversion to Sa Arb, Sa SN, and Sa MaxRot

Ground motion directionality in the Canterbury earthquakes

Selection of Ground Motion Records for Two Dam Sites in Oregon

Assessment of Seismic Design Motions in Areas of Low Seismicity: Comparing Australia and New Zealand

PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East

GEM-PEER Global GMPEs Project Guidance for Including Near-Fault Effects in Ground Motion Prediction Models

Ground Motion Prediction Equations: Past, Present, and Future

GMPEs for Active Crustal Regions: Applicability for Controlling Sources

SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS. Instructional Material Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Seismic Hazard Analysis 5a - 1

Maximum Direction to Geometric Mean Spectral Response Ratios using the Relevance Vector Machine

Are Ground-Motion Models Derived from Natural Events Applicable to the Estimation of Expected Motions for Induced Earthquakes?

EARTHQUAKE CLUSTERS, SMALL EARTHQUAKES

Seismic Hazard Assessment for Çetin Dam

Seismic Hazard Epistemic Uncertainty in the San Francisco Bay Area and its Role in Performance-Based Assessment

Hybrid Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Using NGA Models and Updated Seismological Parameters

Global GMPEs. Caribbean Regional Programme Workshop Port of Spain, Trinidad & Tobago, May 2 nd 2011

PEER PSHA Code Verification Project. Christie Hale Norm Abrahamson Yousef Bozorgnia

Ground motion selection for performance-based engineering, and the Conditional Mean Spectrum as a selection tool

Deterministic Generation of Broadband Ground Motions! with Simulations of Dynamic Ruptures on Rough Faults! for Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Analysis

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER

Review of The Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Implications. for Seismic Design Levels dated July 2011

Hybrid Empirical Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Using NGA Models and Updated Seismological Parameters

Conditional Spectrum Computation Incorporating Multiple Causal Earthquakes and Ground Motion Prediction Models

Received: 29 January 2013 / Accepted: 9 October 2013 / Published online: 8 November 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Comparisons of ground motions from the M 9 Tohoku earthquake with ground-motion prediction equations for subduction interface earthquakes

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD ASSESSMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN

Rupture directivity effects during the April 15, 2016 Kumamoto. Mw7.0 earthquake in Japan

7 Ground Motion Models

SEISMIC HAZARD AND SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ARABIAN PENINSULA REGION

An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) Jack W. Baker

Knowledge of in-slab earthquakes needed to improve seismic hazard estimates for southwestern British Columbia

Engineering Characteristics of Ground Motion Records of the Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake of June 23, 2010

A Test of the Applicability of NGA Models to the Strong Ground-Motion Data in the Iranian Plateau

Empirical Correlations between Cumulative Absolute Velocity and Amplitude-Based Ground Motion Intensity Measures

Comparison of earthquake source spectra and attenuation in eastern North America and southeastern Australia

Development of Earthquake Risk-Targeted Ground Motions for Indonesian Earthquake Resistance Building Code SNI

Relevance Vector Machines for Earthquake Response Spectra

Empirical Correlations between Peak Ground Velocity and Spectrum-based Intensity Measures

THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM

GROUND MOTION. based on National Network station basis.

PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER. NGA-West2 Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Vertical Ground Motions

Spatial Cross-correlation Models for Vector Intensity Measures (PGA, Ia, PGV and Sa s) Considering Regional Site Conditions

Development of U. S. National Seismic Hazard Maps and Implementation in the International Building Code

Site specific seismic hazard assessment a case study of Guanyin offshore wind farm 場址特定地震危害度評估 - 以觀音離岸風力發電廠為例

S. Barani 1, D. Albarello 2, M. Massa 3, D. Spallarossa 1

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Quetta, Pakistan

5. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis

Near-Source Ground Motion along Strike-Slip Faults: Insights into Magnitude Saturation of PGV and PGA

(Seismological Research Letters, July/August 2005, Vol.76 (4): )

Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East

Site-specific hazard analysis for geotechnical design in New Zealand

NEXT GENERATION ATTENUATION (NGA) EMPIRICAL GROUND MOTION MODELS: CAN THEY BE USED IN EUROPE?

Geo-Marine Letters Volume 36, 2016, electronic supplementary material

Peak Ground Acceleration on Bedrock and Uniform Seismic Hazard Spectra for Different Regions of Golpayegan, Iran

! " 89: ?+ XM - .8M- J " j! G _k EZ-FRISK.

Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) Projects

DEVELOPMENT OF DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRAL SHAPES FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN U.S. (CEUS) AND WESTERN U.S. (WUS) ROCK SITE CONDITIONS*

GROUND MOTION TIME HISTORIES FOR THE VAN NUYS BUILDING

Preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Nuclear Power Plant Bohunice (Slovakia) site

Arthur Frankel, William Stephenson, David Carver, Jack Odum, Robert Williams, and Susan Rhea U.S. Geological Survey

Simulation-based Seismic Hazard Analysis Using CyberShake

PSHA results for the BSHAP region

I N T R O D U C T I O N T O P R O B A B I L I S T I C S E I S M I C H A Z A R D A N A LY S I S

ATTENUATION FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP OF SUBDUCTION MECHANISM AND FAR FIELD EARTHQUAKE

THE EFFECT OF THE LATEST SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE TO MALAYSIAN PENINSULAR

ACCOUNTING FOR SITE EFFECTS IN PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS: OVERVIEW OF THE SCEC PHASE III REPORT

AN OVERVIEW AND GUIDELINES FOR PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING

Codal provisions of seismic hazard in Northeast India

Technical Report for the PEER Ground Motion Database Web Application

יישום של פרוצדורה משופרת של SEEH עבור תקן בניה של ישראל

A note on ground motion recorded during Mw 6.1 Mae Lao (Northern Thailand) earthquake on 5 May 2014

GROUNDWORK FOR USING PRECARIOUSLY BALANCED ROCKS TO CONSTRAIN SEISMIC HAZARD MODELS IN NEW ZEALAND

Conditional Spectrum Computation Incorporating Multiple Causal Earthquakes and Ground-Motion Prediction Models

EXPLICIT MODELING OF GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF FRAGILITY MODELS

Transcription:

Seismic hazard modeling for Bulgaria D. Solakov, S. Simeonova

Bulgarian seismic network and foreign stations used in epicenter location

Sismicity in Bulgaria and surroundings (M 4.)

Epicentral map for Bulgaria and surroundings (after 198, all recorded quakes)

SEISMIC ZONING MAP 1961-1964 First building code - 1957 SEISMIC ZONING MAP 1977

SEISMIC SOURCES SEISMIC ZONING MAP 1987, return period 1 years 7.6-8. 7.1-6.6-7. 6.1-5.6-6. 5.1-4.6-5. 4.1-4.1-4.6-5. 4.1-4.1-4.1-4.6-5. 4.6-5. 4.6-5. 4.1-4.1-4.6-5. 4.6-5.

PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HZARD ASSESSMENT The probability that a ground motion parameter, Z, at a given site, will exceed a specified level, z, during a given time period, t, is given by the expression: P(Z z t)=1-e - (z)t (z)t where (z) is the average frequency during time period t at which the level of ground motion parameter Z exceeds z at the site, resulting from earthquakes in all sources in the region. The frequency of exceedance, (z) is calculated by: ( z) n n ( m ) u m m f ( m) f ( r m) P( Z z m, r) drdm n (m o ) is the frequency of earthquakes on source n above a m o (min. mag. of ing. Importance); f(m) is the PDF for events between m o and maximal event for the source m u ; f(r m) is the PDF for distance to the earthquake rupture; P(Z z m,r) is the probability that for a given magnitude m earthquake at a distance r from the site, the ground motion exceeds level z.

A seismic source model is developed for PSHA for the territory of Bulgaria. The model is based on complex geodetic, geological, geophysical and seismological data and is presented in Fig. For each source are defined the all parameters describing the seismicity in the source. Two cases are considered: 1.All sources are areal sources earthquakes are randomly distributed in the corresponding source 2.Smaller earthquakes are randomly distributed in the source while stronger earthquakes are happened only on the faults defined in the source. The final result is a mean of the two considered cases. The hazard was evaluated for a grid with cell size.5 x.5.

COMPLEX GEOLOGO-GEOPHYSICAL AND SEISMOLOGICAL MAP

Influence of intermediate Vrancea earthquakes

DEAGGREGATION OF THE 475 YEARS HAZARD Northern cities The city of Varna The city of Targovishte.14.25.12.1.8.6.4.2 5. 6. 7..2.15.1.5 5. 6. 7. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 7. 6. 5. Normalized number of exceedance Distance (km) 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 7. 6. 5. M Normalized number of exceedances Distance (km) M The city of Dobrich The city of Shumen.25.3.2.15.1.5 5. 6. 7..25.2.15.1.5 5. 6. 7. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 7. 6. 5. Normalized number of exceedance Distance (km) 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 7. 6. 5. Normalized number of exceedances Distance (km) M M

DEAGGREGATION OF THE 475 YEARS HAZARD Southern cities The city of Stara Zagora The city of Sliven.12.25.1.8.6.4.2 5. 6. 7..2.15.1.5 5. 6. 7. The city of Yambol The city of Burgas.25.25.2.15.1.5 5. 6. 7..2.15.1.5 5. 6. 7. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 7. 6. 5. Normalized number of exceedances Distance (km) 7. 6. 5. M 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 36 38 4 Normalized number of exceedances 5. 6. 7. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 36 Normalized number of exceedance Distance (km) 5. 6. 7. 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 22 24 26 28 3 32 34 36 Normalized number of exceedances Disrance (km) M M Distance (km) M

DEAGGREGATION OF THE 475 YEARS HAZARD South-Eastern part South-East 475 г..8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1 Normalized number of exceedances 5. 6. 7. 8. 8. 7. 6. 5. M 4 8 12 16 2 24 28 32 36 Distance (km) 4 44 48

DETERMINISTIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT Akkar and Bommer (29, rev:21) - Akkar S, Bommer JJ (21) Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East. Seismological Research Letters 81 (2): 195-26. Boore and Atkinson (28) - Boore, D.M. and Atkinson G. M. (28), Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between.1 s and 1. s Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp: 99 138 Chiou and Youngs (28) - Chiou, B.S:J. and R.R. Youngs (28) An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp: 173 215 Campbell and Bozorgnia (28) - Campbell, K. W. and Y. Bozorgnia (28) NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from.1 to 1 s Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp: 139 171 Abrahamson and Silva (28) - Abrahamson, N. and W. Silva (28) Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations Earthquake Spectra, Volume 24, No. 1, pp. 67 97

Active faults

5%-Damped Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectrum 5%-Damped Pseudo-Absolute Acceleration Response Spectrum 1 1 1 1 Spectral Acceleration).1.1 Spectral Acceleration).1.1.1.1.1 Period (s) 1 1.1.1.1 Period (s) 1 1 Median Median + N.σ Median Median + N.σ Bourgas, Fault length=64 km, M=7.2, distance=31km Varna, M=8, distance=39km

National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography