Definitions Chapter 1 Proof Technique (Pg.1): Proof (Pg.2): Statement (Pg.2): Conditional Statement/Implication (Pg3.): Hypothesis(Pg.

Similar documents
The following techniques for methods of proofs are discussed in our text: - Vacuous proof - Trivial proof

1. Propositions: Contrapositives and Converses

1.1 Language and Logic

Connectives Name Symbol OR Disjunction And Conjunction If then Implication/ conditional If and only if Bi-implication / biconditional

Web Solutions for How to Read and Do Proofs

Some Review Problems for Exam 1: Solutions

COT 2104 Homework Assignment 1 (Answers)

1.1 Language and Logic

Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics.

Basic Proof Examples

Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development Department of Teaching and Learning. Mathematical Proof and Proving (MPP)

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #A4 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, Methods of Proof

Proof by Contradiction

MATH 215 Final. M4. For all a, b in Z, a b = b a.

3 The language of proof

586 Index. vertex, 369 disjoint, 236 pairwise, 272, 395 disjoint sets, 236 disjunction, 33, 36 distributive laws

Meaning of Proof Methods of Proof

MATH 135 Fall 2006 Proofs, Part IV

MATH10040: Chapter 0 Mathematics, Logic and Reasoning

Basic Logic and Proof Techniques

For all For every For each For any There exists at least one There exists There is Some

Handout on Logic, Axiomatic Methods, and Proofs MATH Spring David C. Royster UNC Charlotte

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q

Proof. Theorems. Theorems. Example. Example. Example. Part 4. The Big Bang Theory

Sec$on Summary. Mathematical Proofs Forms of Theorems Trivial & Vacuous Proofs Direct Proofs Indirect Proofs

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter

Discrete Mathematics & Mathematical Reasoning Predicates, Quantifiers and Proof Techniques

Proofs. Chapter 2 P P Q Q

Lecture 2: Proof Techniques Lecturer: Lale Özkahya

A Guide to Proof-Writing

Math 300 Introduction to Mathematical Reasoning Autumn 2017 Proof Templates 1

PROOFS IN MATHEMATICS

a. See the textbook for examples of proving logical equivalence using truth tables. b. There is a real number x for which f (x) < 0. (x 1) 2 > 0.

Proof techniques (section 2.1)

The Process of Mathematical Proof

Direct Proof MAT231. Fall Transition to Higher Mathematics. MAT231 (Transition to Higher Math) Direct Proof Fall / 24

Foundations of Discrete Mathematics

Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352

Notes for Math 290 using Introduction to Mathematical Proofs by Charles E. Roberts, Jr.

Chapter 2 Section 2.1: Proofs Proof Techniques. CS 130 Discrete Structures

CS 360, Winter Morphology of Proof: An introduction to rigorous proof techniques

Mat 243 Exam 1 Review

Theorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1)

Math 10850, fall 2017, University of Notre Dame

Mathematics 220 Midterm Practice problems from old exams Page 1 of 8

Chapter 1 Elementary Logic

What is a proof? Proofing as a social process, a communication art.

Review Sheet for the Final Exam of MATH Fall 2009

Mathematical Reasoning (Part I) 1

Section Summary. Proof by Cases Existence Proofs

WUCT121. Discrete Mathematics. Logic. Tutorial Exercises

Logical Operators. Conjunction Disjunction Negation Exclusive Or Implication Biconditional

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH WINTER

CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH SPRING

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University

n n P} is a bounded subset Proof. Let A be a nonempty subset of Z, bounded above. Define the set

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes

(3,1) Methods of Proof

Logical Reasoning. Chapter Statements and Logical Operators

Example: Use a direct argument to show that the sum of two even integers has to be even. Solution: Recall that an integer is even if it is a multiple

Lecture 5 : Proofs DRAFT

AN INTRODUCTION TO MATHEMATICAL PROOFS NOTES FOR MATH Jimmy T. Arnold

Proofs. Joe Patten August 10, 2018

Chapter III. Basic Proof Techniques. Proving the obvious has never been easy. Marty Rubin

Section 3.1: Direct Proof and Counterexample 1

Introducing Proof 1. hsn.uk.net. Contents

HOMEWORK 1: SOLUTIONS - MATH 215 INSTRUCTOR: George Voutsadakis

Writing Mathematical Proofs

HANDOUT AND SET THEORY. Ariyadi Wijaya

1 Implication and induction

Recall that the expression x > 3 is not a proposition. Why?

CHAPTER 8: EXPLORING R

3.6. Disproving Quantified Statements Disproving Existential Statements

Proof Terminology. Technique #1: Direct Proof. Learning objectives. Proof Techniques (Rosen, Sections ) Direct Proof:

In N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend N to the integers

2 Arithmetic. 2.1 Greatest common divisors. This chapter is about properties of the integers Z = {..., 2, 1, 0, 1, 2,...}.

Boolean Algebra and Proof. Notes. Proving Propositions. Propositional Equivalences. Notes. Notes. Notes. Notes. March 5, 2012

In N we can do addition, but in order to do subtraction we need to extend N to the integers

Contradiction MATH Contradiction. Benjamin V.C. Collins, James A. Swenson MATH 2730

CSC165. Larry Zhang, October 7, 2014

Proofs. Introduction II. Notes. Notes. Notes. Slides by Christopher M. Bourke Instructor: Berthe Y. Choueiry. Fall 2007

LECTURE 1. Logic and Proofs

ELEMENTARY NUMBER THEORY AND METHODS OF PROOF

5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting

Inference and Proofs (1.6 & 1.7)

Introduction to Basic Proof Techniques Mathew A. Johnson

Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems

Lecture 3. Logic Predicates and Quantified Statements Statements with Multiple Quantifiers. Introduction to Proofs. Reading (Epp s textbook)

0.Axioms for the Integers 1

Quantifiers. P. Danziger

Logic, Sets, and Proofs

Chapter 5: The Integers

Recitation 7: Existence Proofs and Mathematical Induction

HOW TO WRITE PROOFS. Dr. Min Ru, University of Houston

Introduction to proofs. Niloufar Shafiei

A Brief Introduction to Proofs

DISCRETE MATH: FINAL REVIEW

Math 13, Spring 2013, Lecture B: Midterm

THE LOGIC OF QUANTIFIED STATEMENTS. Predicates and Quantified Statements I. Predicates and Quantified Statements I CHAPTER 3 SECTION 3.

Proofs of Mathema-cal Statements. A proof is a valid argument that establishes the truth of a statement.

Transcription:

Definitions Chapter 1 Proof Technique (Pg.1): Any method for proving that the statement A implies B is true. Proof (Pg.2): A convincing argument expressed in the language of mathematics that a statement is true. Statement (Pg.2): A sentence that is either true or false. Conditional Statement/Implication (Pg3.): A statement of the form, If A is true, then B is true, where A and B are given statements. Hypothesis(Pg.3): The statement A in the implication A implies B. When proving A implies B, you can assume that the hypothesis A is true. Conclusion(Pg.3): The statement B in the implication A implies B. When proving A implies B, your job is to show that the conclusion B is true. Truth Table (Pg.4): A table that lists the truth of a complex statement (such as A implies B ) for all possible combinations of truth values of the individual statements (in this case, A and B ). Chapter 2 Forward-Backward Method (Pg.9): The technique for proving that A implies B in which you assume that A is true and try to show that B is true. To do so, you apply the forward process to A and the backward process to B. Backward Process (Pg.9): The process of deriving from a statement, B, a new statement, B1, with the property that, if B1 is true, then so is B. You do this by asking and answering a key question. Forward Process (Pg.9): The process of deriving from a statement, A, a new statement, A 1, with the property that A 1 is true because A is true. Key Question (Pg.10): The specific question obtained by asking how you can show that a given statement B is true. Abstract Answer (Pg.10): An answer that contains no symbols from the specific problem. Analysis of Proof(Pg.15): The techniques, methodology and reasoning involved in doing the proof. Chapter 3 Definition (Pg.25): An agreement, by all parties concerned, as to the meaning of a particular term. Divides (Pg.26): An integer n divides an integer m ( written n m ) if m = kn, for some integer k. Prime Integer (Pg.26): An integer p > 1 is prime if the only positive integers that divide p are 1 and p.

Equal(Pg.26): Two ordered pairs of real numbers ( x 1,x 2 ) and ( y 1,y 2 ) are equal if x 1 = y 2 and x 2 = y 2. Even Integer (Pg.26): An integer n whose remainder on dividing by 2 is 0. Equivalently, an integer n for which there is an integer k such that n = 2k. Odd Integer (Pg.26): An integer n for which there is an integer k such that n = 2 k + 1 Isosceles Triangle (Pg.26): A triangle is isosceles if two of its sides have equal length. Rational Number (Pg.26): A real number r for which there are integers p and q with q =/= 0 such that r = p/q. Equivalent (Pg.26): Two statements A and B are equivalent if and only if A implies B and B implies A. AND (Pg.26): For two statements A and B, the statement A AND B (written A B )is true when both A and B are true, and false otherwise. OR (Pg.26): For two statements A and B, the statement A OR B (written A B ) is false when A is false and B is false, and true otherwise. Overlapping Notation(Pg.28): That is,when the same symbol is used in both sets. Matching up the Notation(Pg.28): Previous Knowledge(Pg.30): Previously prove implication Pythagorean Theorem (Pg.32): If ABC is a right triangle with sides of lengths a and b and hypotenuse of length c, then a 2 + b 2 = c 2. Proposition (Pg.32): A true statement of interest that you are trying to prove. Theorem (Pg.33): An important proposition. Lemma(Pg.33): A proposition that is used in the proof of a subsequent theorem. Corollary (Pg.33): A proposition whose truth follows almost immediately from a theorem. Axioms (Pg.33): A statement whose truth is accepted without a proof. Pg.33 Contrapositive Statement (Pg.33): The contrapositive of the statement A implies B is the statement NOT B implies NOT A. Converse Statement (Pg.33): The converse of the statement A implies B is the statement B implies A. Inverse Statement (Pg.33): The inverse of the statement A implies B is the statement NOT A implies NOT B. Chapter 4 Quantifier (Pg.41): One of the two groups of keywords there is ( there are, there exists ) and for all ( for each, for every, for any ). Existential Quantifier (Pg.41): The key words there is ( there are, there exists ). Universal Quantifier (Pg.41): The key words for all ( for each, for every, for any ). Square Integer (Pg.42)r: An integer n such that there is an integer k with n = k 2. Standard Form for there is (Pg.42): There is an object with a certain property,

something happens. Construction Method (Pg.44): A technique for proving that there is an object with a certain property such that something happens. To do so, construct, guess,produce, or devise an algorithm to produce the desired object. Then show that the object you constructed has the certain property and satisfies the something that happens. Chapter 5 Set (Pg.53): A collection of items. Member/Element of a Set (Pg.53): An item that belongs to a given set. Set-Builder Notation (Pg.54): Using a verbal and mathematical description for the members of the set. The set of all real numbers that are greater than or equal to 0 is written as follows: S = { real numbers x : x 0 }, where the : stands for the words such that. Everything following the : is referred to as the defining property of the set. Empty (Pg.54): The set with no elements, written. Subset (Pg.55): A set S is a subset of a set T (written S T or S T ) if and only if, for every element x S, x T. Standard Form for for all/ for every/ for each/ for any (Pg.55): For all objects with a certain property, something happens. Equal Sets (Pg.55): Two sets S and T are equal (written S = T ) if and only if S is a subset of T and T is a subset of S. Choose Method (Pg.56): A technique for proving that, for every object with a cer-tain property, something happens. To do so, choose a generic object with the certain property. Then show that, for this chosen object, the something happens. Maximizer (Pg.63) :The real number x * is a maximizer of the function f if and only if for every real number x, f ( x ) f ( x * ). On the set (Pg.63): Suppose that f and g are functions of one variable. Then g f on the set S of real numbers if and only if for every element x S, g ( x ) f ( x ). Strictly Increasing (Pg.63): A function f of one real variable is strictly increasing if and only if for all real numbers x and y with x < y, f ( x ) < f ( y ). Convex Set(Pg.63): A set C of real numbers such that, for all elements x,y C and for all real numbers t with 0 t 1, tx + (1 t ) y C. Convex Function (Pg.63): A function f of one variable such that, for all real numbers x and y and for all real numbers t with 0 t 1, it follows that f ( tx + (1 t ) y ) tf ( x ) + (1 t ) f ( y ). Chapter 6 Specialization(Pg.69) : The result of replacing mathematical symbols in a generalization with specific values. Upper Bound for a Set (Pg.71): A real number u such that, for all x S, x u (where S is a given set of real numbers). Least Upper Bound (Pg.73): A real number u such that, for a given set S of real

numbers, (1) u is an upper bound for S and (2) for every upper bound v for S, u v. Chapter 7 Syntax Error (Pg.83): A mistake in a mathematical sentences in which the symbols or operations make no sense or cannot be performed. Onto/Surjective Function (Pg.84): A real-valued function f of one real variable such that, for every real number y, there is a real number x such that f ( x ) = y. Bounded Above Function (Pg.87): A real-valued function f of one real variable for which there is a real number y such that, for every real number x, f ( x ) y. Bounded (Pg.87): b. A set of real numbers S is bounded if and only if there is a real number M > 0 such that, element x S, x < M. Continuous Function at the Point (Pg.87): A function f of one variable such that,at a given point x, for every real number > 0, there is a real number δ > 0 such that, for all real numbers y with x y < δ, f ( x ) f ( y ) <. Converges to (Pg.87): Suppose that x 1,x 2,... and x are real numbers. The sequence x 1,x 2,... converges to x if and only if real numbers > 0, an integer j 1 integer k with k > j, x k x < Linear function(pg.92): A real-valued function f of one real variable for which there are real numbers m and b such that, for all real numbers x, f ( x ) = mx + b. Chapter 8 Increasing (Pg.98): A sequence x 1,x 2,... of real numbers is decreasing if and only if for every integer k = 1, 2,..., x k < x k+1 Decreasing (Pg.98): A sequence x 1,x 2,... of real numbers is decreasing if and only if for every integer k = 1, 2,..., x k > x k+1 Strictly Monotone (Pg.99): A sequence x 1,x 2,... of real numbers is strictly monotone if and only if the sequence is increasing or decreasing. (Use the word and in the negation.) Greatest Common Divisor (Pg.99): An integer d is the greatest common divisor of the integers a and b if and only if (i) d a and d b and (ii) whenever c is an integer for which c a and c b, it follows that c d. Derivative (Pg.99): The real number f ( x ) is the derivative of the function f at the point x if and only if real number > 0, a real number δ > 0 such that real number x with 0 < x x < δ, ( f ( x )-f ( x ) ) / (x - x) <. Chapter 9 Contradiction Method (Pg. 102): A technique for proving that A implies B in which you work forward from the assumption that A and NOT B are true to reach a contradiction to some statement that you know is true.

One-to-One (Pg.111: A real-valued function f of one real variable such that, for all real numbers x and y with x =/= y, f ( x ) = /= f ( y ). Chapter 10 Contrapositive Method (Pg.115): A technique for proving that A implies B in which you prove that NOT B implies NOT A by working forward from NOT B and backward from NOT A. Chapter 11 Uniqueness Method (Pg. 125): A technique used when the proposition contains the keyword unique (or one and only one or exactly one ) as well as the quantifier there is. There are three different forms for the Uniqueness Method: forward uniqueness, direct backward uniqueness, and indirect backward uniqueness. Chapter 12 Induction Method (Pg. 133): A proof technique used in the special case when the conclusion of the proposition involves a for all such as for every integer n>=1, `something happens.