Running quark and lepton masses

Similar documents
A Domino Theory of Flavor

TeV-scale type-i+ii seesaw mechanism and its collider signatures at the LHC

Outlook Post-Higgs. Fermilab. UCLA Higgs Workshop March 22, 2013

Neutrino Masses & Flavor Mixing 邢志忠. Zhi-zhong Xing. (IHEP, Winter School 2010, Styria, Austria. Lecture B

COLLIDER STUDIES OF HIGGS TRIPLET MODEL

COLLIDER STUDIES OF HIGGS TRIPLET MODEL

Particle Physics Today, Tomorrow and Beyond. John Ellis

The Standard Model and Beyond

A String Model for Preons and the Standard Model Particles. Abstract

RG evolution of neutrino parameters

JIGSAW 07. Neutrino Mixings and Leptonic CP Violation from CKM Matrix and Majorana Phases. Sanjib Kumar Agarwalla

Implications of the Higgs mass results

EDMs and flavor violation in SUSY models

Neutrino Mass Seesaw, Baryogenesis and LHC

The Standard Model of particle physics and beyond

SUSY scale from unication

Lecture 18 - Beyond the Standard Model

Flavor, Minimality and Naturalness in Composite Higgs Models

Origin of Mass of the Higgs Boson

LFV Higgs Decay in Extended Mirror Fermion Model

F. Börkeroth, F. J. de Anda, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King. arxiv:

Neutrino Masses and Dark Matter in Gauge Theories for Baryon and Lepton Numbers

Directions for BSM physics from Asymptotic Safety

Lectures on Standard Model Effective Field Theory

Lecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part III Extensions of the Standard Model

generation Outline Outline Motivation Electroweak constraints Selected flavor constraints in B and D sector Conclusion Nejc Košnik

Gauged Flavor Symmetries

Electroweak-scale Right-handed Neutrino Model And 126 GeV Higgs-like Particle

Flavor Models with Sterile Neutrinos. NuFact 11 Geneva, Aug, He Zhang

Neutrinos and Fundamental Symmetries: L, CP, and CP T

Flavor Physics in the multi-higgs doublet models induced by the left-right symmetry

How high could SUSY go?

Neutrino masses : beyond d=5 tree-level operators

Solar and atmospheric neutrino mass splitting with SMASH model

Physics 662. Particle Physics Phenomenology. February 21, Physics 662, lecture 13 1

Toward a Precision Standard Model Theory of the Higgs Boson Couplings

Baryon and Lepton Number Violation at the TeV Scale

J. C. Vasquez CCTVal & USM

Fourth SM Family at the LHC: ATLAS prospects. Saleh SULTANSOY

A model of the basic interactions between elementary particles is defined by the following three ingredients:

Supersymmetric Seesaws

GUT Scale Fermion Mass Ratios

Family Replicated Gauge Group Models

THE SEESAW MECHANISM AND RENORMALIZATION GROUP EFFECTS

Unified Dark Matter. SUSY2014 Stephen J. Lonsdale. The University of Melbourne. In collaboration with R.R. Volkas. arxiv:

tan(beta) Enhanced Yukawa Couplings for Supersymmetric Higgs

Supersymmetry, Dark Matter, and Neutrinos

21th. December 2007 Seminar Univ. of Toyama. D6 Family Sym. and CDM at LHC J. Kubo, Y. Kajiyama (Phys. Rev. D )

Type I Seesaw Mechanism, Lepton Flavour Violation and Higgs Decays

Threshold cross sections for Drell-Yan & Higgs productions in N 3 LO QCD

Leptogenesis with Composite Neutrinos

Mirror fermions, electroweak scale right-handed neutrinos and experimental implications

November 24, Scalar Dark Matter from Grand Unified Theories. T. Daniel Brennan. Standard Model. Dark Matter. GUTs. Babu- Mohapatra Model

Flavor hierarchies from dynamical scales

Right-Handed Neutrinos as the Origin of the Electroweak Scale

Problems for SM/Higgs (I)

SO(10) SUSY GUTs with family symmetries: the test of FCNCs

Dark Ma'er and Gauge Coupling Unifica6on in Non- SUSY SO(10) Grand Unified Models

Lepton-flavor violation in tau-lepton decay and the related topics

Fermion Mixing Angles and the Connection to Non-Trivially Broken Flavor Symmetries

Pseudo-Dirac Bino as Dark Matter and Signatures of D-Type G

Neutrino Oscillation, Leptogenesis and Spontaneous CP Violation

Potential Discoveries at the Large Hadron Collider. Chris Quigg

Scenarios with Composite Higgs Bosons

Proton decay theory review

Lepton Flavor and CPV

For Review Only. General Structure of Democratic Mass Matrix of Lepton Sector in E 6 Model. Canadian Journal of Physics

Probing the charged Higgs boson at the LHC in the CP-violating type-ii 2HDM

Searching for neutral Higgs bosons in non-standard channels

Koide formula: beyond charged leptons

Introduction to Supersymmetry

Beyond the Standard Model

PSEUDO SCALAR FORM FACTORS AT 3-LOOP QCD. Taushif Ahmed Institute of Mathematical Sciences, India March 22, 2016

Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Mikhail Shaposhnikov

Gauge-Higgs Unification on Flat Space Revised

Grand Unification. Strong, weak, electromagnetic unified at Q M X M Z Simple group SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Gravity not included

Flavor violating Z from

Introduction to perturbative QCD and factorization

Probing the Majorana nature in radiative seesaw models at collider experiments

Mass. Chris Quigg Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

Koji TSUMURA (NTU Nagoya U.) KEK 16-18/2/2012

G.F. Giudice. Theoretical Implications of the Higgs Discovery. DaMeSyFla Meeting Padua, 11 April 2013

TeV Scale Seesaw with Loop Induced

Pati-Salam GUT-Flavour Models with Three Higgs Generations

Testing Origin of Neutrino Mass at the LHC

SU(3)-Flavons and Pati-Salam-GUTs

+ µ 2 ) H (m 2 H 2

Effective Theories are Dimensional Analysis

! s. and QCD tests at hadron colliders. world summary of! s newest results (selection)! s from hadron colliders remarks

750GeV diphoton excess and some explanations. Jin Min Yang

Conformal Standard Model

Top quark pole mass measurements in ATLAS

Sterile Neutrinos from the Top Down

E 6 Spectra at the TeV Scale

SUSY and Exotics. UK HEP Forum"From the Tevatron to the LHC, Cosener s House, May /05/2009 Steve King, UK HEP Forum '09, Abingdon 1

Neutrinos, GUTs, and the Early Universe

Higgs Top couplings. Zhen Liu. Based on work with Ian Low and Lian-Tao Wang, to appear

Proton Decay and Flavor Violating Thresholds in the SO(10) Models

SUSY models of neutrino masses and mixings: the left-right connection

Successful Leptogenesis in the Left-Right Symmetric Seesaw Mechanism

Transcription:

Running quark and lepton masses ------Tables of updated values Shun Zhou MPI für Physik, München Based on the work: Z.Z. Xing, H. Zhang & S.Z., Phys. Rev. D 77, 113016 (2008) 48 th Winter School on Theoretical Physics in Schladming, 27 Feb.- 6 Mar., 2010

Outline Fermion Mass Problems: Origin and Hierarchy Running Fermion Masses: below the EW Scale Running Fermion Masses: above the EW Scale Useful Tables and Summary

Higgs boson? LHC Gauge symmetry breaking Origin of fermion masses Physics beyond the Standard Model? Origin of neutrino masses (Seesaw models?) Flavor mixing patterns (large or small mixing angles?) Fermion mass hierarchy (quark-lepton symmetry?) de Gouvea, 2004

u MSSM e d s c t ν e μ b ν μ τ Georgi & Glashow, 1974 ν τ Fritzsch & Minkowski, 1975 Mass Models at the High energy scales Mass Values at the Low energy scale Renormalization Group Equations (RGEs) Gell-Mann & Low, 1954 Callan, 1970; Symanzik, 1970

Theoretical Predictions of Fermion Masses Fermion Masses Extracted from Experimental Data Fermion masses from the PDG 2006 HQET, LQCD, SR Running Masses m(μ) χpt, Lattice QCD, Sum Rules Direct measurements t Hooft scale Manohar & Sachrajda, 2008 Review on Quark Masses, PDG Pole Masses

Remarks: 1. Unlike the leptons, quarks are confined in hadrons. Therefore, quark masses cannot be measured directly. They are indirectly determined from their influence on the properties of hadrons. 2. When talking about quark masses, one should keep in mind that they are defined in a specific theoretical framework, and thus scheme-dependent. For example, the constituent quark masses in the quark models.

Leutwyler, arxiv: 0911.1416

Leutwyler, arxiv: 0911.1416

Running Fermion Masses: below the EW scale Goal: running quark and lepton masses m(μ) at the EW scale μ=mz Formula: (1) RGEs for the strong coupling constant and quark masses t Hoof, 1972 Number of active quarks Gross & Wilczek, 1973; Politzer, 1973 van Ritbergen, Vermaseren & Larin, 1997 Chetyrkin, 1997; van Ritbergen, Vermaseren & Larin, 1997

Formula: (1) RGEs for the strong coupling constant and quark masses Solution of quark masses Chetyrkin, 1997; Chetyrkin & Steinhauser, 1999; Melnikov & van Ritbergen, 2000 Formula: (2) Matching conditions for the strong coupling and masses Mz=91.2 GeV μ=mb(mb) = 4.2 GeV μ=2 GeV nq = 5 nq = 4 Flavor threshold μ=mc(mc) = 1.25 GeV

Formula: (2) Matching conditions for the strong coupling and masses Chetyrkin, Kniehl & Steinhauser, 1998; Chetyrkin, Kuehn & Steinhauser, 2000

Formula: (3) Relation between running mq(μ) and pole masses Mq Chetyrkin & Steinhauser, 1999; Melnikov & van Ritbergen, 2000 K (2) c = 11.21 K (2) b = 10.17 K (2) t = 9.13 K (3) c = 123.8 K (3) b = 101.5 K (3) t = 80.4 Formula: (4) RGEs for α and running masses of charged leptonsm (μ) l Arason et al., 1992

Strategy: (1) Input values from the PDG 2006; (2) Runningmatching-running scheme for the evaluation of quark masses μ(5)=mb(mb) = 4.20 GeV Mz=91.186 GeV μ(4)=mc(mc) = 1.25 GeV nq = 4 μ(5)=mb(mb) = 4.20 GeV Mz=91.186 GeV nq = 5 nq = 6

Running Fermion Masses: above the EW scale Goal: running fermion masses m(μ) at the TeV scale, the seesaw scale and the GUT scale, both in the SM and in the MSSM (1) We adopt the seesaw model for neutrino masses, so neutrinos are assumed to be Majorana particles; (2) Above the EW scale, we define fermion masses as mf = yf v, where yf are the eigenvalues of Yukawa couplings and v is the vev; (3) We use two-loop RGEs for Yu, Yd, Yl, but one-loop RGE for effective neutrino coupling matrix κ. mq(mz) Yu & Yd Machack & Vaughn, 1984; Antusch et al., 2002, 2005; Mei & Xing, 2004; Mei, 2005 Gauge couplings Yl & κ θ12 = 33.8 deg θ23 = 45.0 deg θ13 ~ 0 δ=ρ=σ = 0 (A) m1 = 0.001 ev, m1 < m2 < m3 (B) m1 = 0.2 ev, m1< m2 < m3

Xing, Zhang & Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 77, 113016 (2008) Mathematica code RunDec, by Chetyrkin, Kuehn & Steinhauser, 2000

Xing, Zhang & Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 77, 113016 (2008) In the SM with MH = 140 GeV

Xing, Zhang & Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 77, 113016 (2008) In the SM with MH = 140 GeV

MSSM with tan β = 10 MSSM with tan β = 50

Summary 1. The origin of fermion masses, the fermion mass hierarchy and flavor mixing patterns are still big puzzles in particle physics. New physics beyond the SM is expected so much. 2. The models for fermion masses are usually constructed at the high-energy scales, e.g. the TeV and GUT scales. The predictions should be confronted with experimental data. 3. Starting with the latest values given by PDG, we have evaluated the running quark and lepton masses at the EW, TeV, Seesaw, GUT scales, in the SM and MSSM.