Measurement of the Polarization Observables. Spectrometer. I s and I c for γp p π + π using the CLAS. Charles Hanretty.

Similar documents
The Determination of Beam Asymmetry from Double Pion Photoproduction

Measurement of Polarization Observables Pz, P s z and P c z in Double-Pion Photoproduction off the Proton

Experimental Hadronic Physics at Florida State

Understanding Excited Baryon Resonances: Results from polarization experiments at CLAS

Baryon Spectroscopy at Jefferson Lab What have we learned about excited baryons?

Study of Excited Baryons with the Crystal-Barrel Detector at ELSA

Mukesh Saini. Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. February 26, FSU Nuclear Physics Seminar. February 26

Light Baryon Spectroscopy using the CLAS Spectrometer at Jefferson Laboratory

A Measurement of the Induced polarization of electro-produced Λ(1116) with CLAS

Kaon Photoproduction Results from CLAS

Strangeonia. Of the 22 expected resonances, only 7 are well identified. Strangeonia. η-η' h1 (1386) (1020) f2' (1525) f1 (1426) (1680)

Baryon spectroscopy with polarization observables from CLAS

DETERMINATION OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION FOR THE HALL-B PHOTON BEAM AT JLAB

The Fascinating Structure of Hadrons: What have we learned about excited protons?

THE FIFTH STRUCTURE FUNCTION. Liam Murray Research Advisor: Dr. Gerard Gilfoyle

Light Baryon Spectroscopy What have we learned about excited baryons?

Beam Asymmetry measurement in Pion Photoproduction on the neutron using CLAS

The Beam-Helicity Asymmetry for γp pk + K and

Photoproduction of ϕ-meson by Using Linearly-Polarized Photons at Threshold Energies

Deuteron from CLAS/EG1B Data. Spin Structure Functions of the OUTLINE. Nevzat Guler (for the CLAS Collaboration) Old Dominion University

Measuring Form Factors and Structure Functions With CLAS

The Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Program

What about the pentaquark?

Cascade Spectroscopy at CLAS

Coherent Photoproduction of Proton-Antiproton Pairs on Deuterium

Search for Gluonic Excitations with GlueX at Jefferson Lab

Light-Meson Spectroscopy at Jefferson Lab

Hunting for Quarks. G n M Co-conspirators: Jerry Gilfoyle for the CLAS Collaboration University of Richmond

Search for New and Unusual Strangeonia States Using γp pφη with GlueX at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility

Photoproduction of K 0 Σ + with CLAS

Hadron Physics with Real and Virtual Photons at JLab

Baryon Spectroscopy: Recent Results from the CBELSA/TAPS Experiment

Polarization Observables in Double Pion Photo- Production with Circularly Polarized Photons off Transversely Polarized Protons

Hall-D Update. Eric Pooser. Joint Hall A/C Summer Collaboration Meeting 07/18/2015

Facilities and Detectors for Baryon Physics

Hadron structure with photon and antiproton induced reactions - QCD in the non-perturbative range -

Double polarization measurements with the Crystal Barrel/TAPS experiment at ELSA

Strangeness photoproduction at the BGO-OD experiment

Meson spectroscopy at CLAS and CLAS12: the present and the future. Raffaella De Vita INFN Genova for the CLAS Collaboration

Threshold photoproduction of J/y with the GlueX experiment. Lubomir Pentchev Jefferson Lab for the GlueX collaboration

Report on NSTAR 2005 Workshop

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES FREE PROTON ANDREW MATTHEW WILSON

Measurement of Double-Polarization

The reaction p(e,e'p)π 0 to calibrate the Forward and the Large Angle Electromagnetic Shower Calorimeters

Production and Searches for Cascade Baryons with CLAS

High-t Meson Photoproduction: Experimental Capabilities

Proton Form Factor Puzzle and the CLAS Two-Photon Exchange Experiment

Baryons 2016 International Conference on the Structure of Baryons May 16-20, Tallahassee, Florida G. Fedotov, R. Gothe, V. Burkert, and V.

Baryon Spectroscopy at ELSA

Probing Generalized Parton Distributions in Exclusive Processes with CLAS

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

Nucleon Spectroscopy with CLAS

Flavor Decomposition of Nucleon Spin via polarized SIDIS: JLab 12 GeV and EIC. Andrew Puckett Los Alamos National Laboratory INT 09/24/2010

Nucleon Valence Quark Structure

Light-Meson Spectroscopy. at Jefferson Lab

GlueX Capabilities for Nuclear Photoproduction

The x(1280) Meson in CLAS g11. Ryan Dickson Carnegie Mellon University May 31st, 2010

The Jlab 12 GeV Upgrade

M.Battaglieri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Genova - Italy. A Forward Photon Tagging Facility for CLAS12

The search for missing baryon resonances

BoNuS Program at CLAS and CLAS12:

Time-like Compton Scattering with transversely polarized target

Properties of the Λ(1405) Measured at CLAS

LEPS Physics HOTTA, Tomoaki (RCNP, Osaka University) on behalf of the LEPS&LEPS2 collaboration

CLEO Results From Υ Decays

The π 0 Lifetime Experiment and Future Plans at JLab

A Dyson-Schwinger equation study of the baryon-photon interaction.

Recent Results from Jefferson Lab

Analysis of Lepton Pair Production at GlueX

Pentaquarks: Fact or Fiction?

Impact of γ ν NN* Electrocuplings at High Q 2 and Preliminary Cross Sections off the Neutron

Discovery of charged bottomonium-like Z b states at Belle

CLAS12 at Jefferson Lab

Modifications of the D33(1700) resonance in the nuclear medium

Physics at Hadron Colliders Partons and PDFs

Highlights on hadron physics at CLAS. K. Hicks (Ohio U.) Hadron 2011 Conference June 16, 2011

Hadron multiplicities at the HERMES experiment

Hall B Physics Program and Upgrade Plan

Gluons at high x in Nuclei at EIC

Spin Physics Experiments at SLAC

in high statistics experiments at CLAS

Do you know what is special about quarks?

Hadron Spectroscopy at COMPASS

The achievements of the CERN proton antiproton collider

Overview of N* Physics

Probing the Atomic Nucleus at Jefferson Lab

Plans to measure J/ψ photoproduction on the proton with CLAS12

ETA(547) AND ETA(958) MESON PHOTOPRODUCTION ON THE PROTON. Michael Dugger

F2 and R in Deuterium and Nuclei Phase II (E06 009/E04 001) M. Eric Christy. Hall C Users Meeting Jan 26, 2007

Cross Section of Exclusive π Electro-production from Neutron. Jixie Zhang (CLAS Collaboration) Old Dominion University Sep. 2009

Why? How? to test strong QCD! SU(3) Chiral Perturbation Theory Threshold γn ΚΛ amplitudes K +, K 0, Λ form factors, polarizabilities Lattice QCD

Open questions in hadron physics Spectroscopy with the Crystal Barrel Detector Volker Credé

arxiv: v2 [hep-ex] 12 Feb 2014

Recent results at the -meson region from the CMD-3 detector at the VEPP-2000 collider

Investigation of K0 + photoproduction with the CBELSA/TAPS experiment

The Neutron Structure Function from BoNuS

The π 0 Lifetime: Experimental Probe of. Dustin E. McNulty MIT/UMass for the PrimEx Collaboration April 16, 2008

Physics at Hadron Colliders

Recent Results from Fermilab Charm Experiment E791. David A. Sanders. Representing the Fermilab Experiment E791 Collaboration

Neutrons in a Spin: Nucleon Structure at Jefferson Lab

Transcription:

Measurement of the I s and I c for γp p π + π using the CLAS Spectrometer Charles Hanretty Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL October 3, 2 Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 / 58

Outline Theory and Motivation Theory and Motivation Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances 2 Jefferson Lab Hall B 3 Extraction of Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 2 / 58

What is the big picture? Theory and Motivation Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Hadrons: Particles that are held together and interact via the strong force. Exist as bound states of quarks. Are the most fundamental of systems found in nature. Members of this group are Baryons and Mesons. Quark Structure: Baryon: qqq Quark Structure: Meson: q q Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 3 / 58

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Properties of QCD Describes the strong force. Introduces a color charge analogous to the electric charge (red, blue, green). Gluons and quarks possess a color charge, antiparticles possess anticolor. All observed particles are white or colorless states. Interactions are mediated by gluons. Since gluons carry a color charge, they mediate AND participate in the interactions. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 4 / 58

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD): Features Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Two main features of QCD Asymptotic Freedom: When the energy of the system is high (like in a high energy reaction high momentum transfer), the quarks and gluons interact very weakly. Baryon can then be treated as being comprised of three non-interacting quarks pqcd. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 5 / 58

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD): Features Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Two main features of QCD Asymptotic Freedom: When the energy of the system is high (like in a high energy reaction high momentum transfer), the quarks and gluons interact very weakly. Baryon can then be treated as being comprised of three non-interacting quarks pqcd. Confinement: The attractive force between quarks grows with the distance between them. This means that the quarks are confined to be in the hadron there are no free quarks (non-pqcd). Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 6 / 58

Constituent Quark Models (CQMs) N Resonances (I = /2) Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Constituent quarks are the current or bare valence quarks after they have been dressed with the mass of the sea quarks and the sea gluons. U. Loring, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A, 39 (2), heo-ph/3287 Generated using predictions according to a model view of the baryon. Assumes three quark degrees of freedom. Various models differ in how they treat short-range interactions. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 7 / 58

Constituent Quark Models (CQMs) N Resonances (I = /2) Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances U. Loring, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A, 39 (2), heo-ph/3287 Generated using predictions according to a model view of the baryon. Assumes three quark degrees of freedom. Various models differ in how they treat short-range interactions. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 8 / 58

CQMs: Missing Resonances Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances N Resonances (I = /2) Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 9 / 58

Why so many missing resonances? Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Possible answers and reasons... Most of what is found in the PDG handbooks has come from πn and KN scattering γn. Analyses involved a single meson final state (i.e. K + Λ, K + Σ, Nπ, Nη). Analyze a double-meson final state has the largest cross section. Sequential decay to final ground state particles: ex. γp N ++ π p π + π. Particle mass widths expected to be 5 MeV too big for a two-body (single meson) final state. Possible quark-diquark structure of the baryon. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 / 58

Why so many missing resonances? Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Possible answers and reasons... Most of what is found in the PDG handbooks has come from πn and KN scattering γn. Analyses involved a single meson final state (i.e. K + Λ, K + Σ, Nπ, Nη). Analyze a double-meson final state has the largest cross section. Sequential decay to final ground state particles: ex. γp N ++ π p π + π. Particle mass widths expected to be 5 MeV too big for a two-body (single meson) final state. Possible quark-diquark structure of the baryon. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 / 58

Why so many missing resonances? Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Possible answers and reasons... Most of what is found in the PDG handbooks has come from πn and KN scattering γn. Analyses involved a single meson final state (i.e. K + Λ, K + Σ, Nπ, Nη). Analyze a double-meson final state has the largest cross section. Sequential decay to final ground state particles: ex. γp N ++ π p π + π. Particle mass widths expected to be 5 MeV too big for a two-body (single meson) final state. Possible quark-diquark structure of the baryon. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 2 / 58

Why so many missing resonances? Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Possible answers and reasons... Most of what is found in the PDG handbooks has come from πn and KN scattering γn. Analyses involved a single meson final state (i.e. K + Λ, K + Σ, Nπ, Nη). Analyze a double-meson final state has the largest cross section. Sequential decay to final ground state particles: ex. γp N ++ π p π + π. Particle mass widths expected to be 5 MeV too big for a two-body (single meson) final state. Possible quark-diquark structure of the baryon. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 3 / 58

Constituent Quark Models (CQMs) Theory: QCD Constituent Quark Models and Missing Resonances Resonances are both broad and overlapping! Makes it very difficult to determine singular resonance contributions. We need a way to disentangle these resonances and determine which resonances are produced! Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 4 / 58

Jefferson Lab Hall B Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of Is and Ic for ~ γ p p π+ π October 3, 2 T HOMAS J EFFERSON N ATIONAL ACCELERATOR FACILITY (JL AB ) The Facility Theory and Motivation 5 / 58

Hall B: The CLAS Detector Jefferson Lab Hall B CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer Drift Chambers Time Of Flight Torus Electromagnetic Calorimeters Cherenkov Counters Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 6 / 58

Hall B: the CLAS Detector Jefferson Lab Hall B Magnetic field of Torus affects the particle s trajectory (bending it toward or away from the beamline). Particle s path through CLAS is tracked. Q > Q < If trigger requirements are met, event is recorded. Reconstruction code determines particle s trajectory through CLAS. Q > Information regarding the incident particle and final state particles are determined. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 7 / 58

Hall B: Photon Tagger Theory and Motivation Jefferson Lab Hall B Electrons from accelerator interact with the radiator, producing photons via bremsstrahlung. Electrons are bent into hodoscope via the Tagger Magnet. Time stamp and energy of electron is measured. Photon energy determined via Eγ = E - E Can tag photons with energies ranging from (.2)E to (.95)E. E Eγ E Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 8 / 58

Polarized Photons Theory and Motivation Jefferson Lab Hall B Circularly polarized beam: longitudinal electron beam + amorphous radiator Linearly polarized beam: unpolarized electron beam + oriented diamond radiator Can obtain 9% polarization g8b highly polarized photons at five energies:.3 GeV,.5 GeV,.7 GeV,.9 GeV and 2. GeV. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 9 / 58

Charles Hanretty (FSU) Jefferson Lab Hall B Measurement of Is and Ic for ~ γ p p π+ π FROST: Transverse Holding Coil Theory and Motivation October 3, 2 2 / 58

Jefferson Lab Hall B Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of Is and Ic for ~ γ p p π+ π FROST: Target Assembly, Testing, Installation Theory and Motivation October 3, 2 2 / 58

Extraction of.4 Measurable quantities called are sensitive to resonance contributions. Occur when the constraint of polarization (beam and/or target) is imposed on the reaction(s). Can be predicted according to model calculations..3 Dr. W. Roberts.2 S 3 (9) omitted Full calc I c P 3 (9) omitted I s.2... -. -.2 -.2..5 2. 2.5 -.4 m pπ -.3.5..5 m π + π φ =.35638 rad φ =.5652 rad φ = 2.876 rad φ = 3.439 rad Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 22 / 58

Extraction of.4 Measurable quantities called are sensitive to resonance contributions. Occur when the constraint of polarization (beam and/or target) is imposed on the reaction(s). Can be predicted according to model calculations..3 Dr. W. Roberts I c.2 S 3 (9) omitted Polarization Full calc observables are highly sensitive to which resonances P. are present! 3 (9) omitted I s.2.. -. -.2 -.2..5 2. 2.5 -.4 m pπ -.3.5..5 m π + π φ =.35638 rad φ =.5652 rad φ = 2.876 rad φ = 3.439 rad Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 23 / 58

Extraction of : Single Meson Final State The final state equation relates the differential cross section, dσ dω polarization observables. For a final state with one meson, there are a total of 7 observables. dσ dω = σ { δl Σ cos(2φ), to the +Λx ( δl H sin(2φ) + δ F ) Λy ( T + δl P cos(2φ) ) Λz ( δl G sin(2φ) + δ E )} Definitions dσ dω = differential cross section σ = unpolarized cross section δ l, = degree and orientation of photon beam polarization Λx,y,z = direction and degree of polarization of the target Σ, H, F, T, P, G, E = polarization observables. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 24 / 58

Extraction of : Double Meson Final State For a final state with two mesons, there are a total of 5 observables! I = I { ( + Λi P )+δ ( I + Λi P ) +δl [ sin(2β) ( I s + Λi P s ) + cos(2β) ( I c + Λi P c ) ] } Definitions I = unpolarized reaction rate Λ i = direction and degree of polarization of the target δ l, = degree and orientation of photon beam polarization P = observable arising from the use of a polarized target I,s,c = observables arising from the use of polarized photons β = orientation of polarization w.r.t. a final state particle (β = φ lab + φ polarization ) Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 25 / 58

Reducing the final state equation Extraction of Applying the run conditions of g8b simplifies the final state equation and reduces the number of observables. Linearly polarized photon beam incident on an unpolarized LH2 target. ( Λi =, δ = ) I = I { ( + Λi P )+δ ( I + Λi P ) +δl [ sin(2β) ( I s + Λi P s ) + cos(2β) ( I c + Λi P c ) ] } Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 26 / 58

Reducing the final state equation Extraction of Applying the run conditions of g8b simplifies the final state equation and reduces the number of observables. Linearly polarized photon beam incident on an unpolarized LH2 target. ( Λi =, δ = ) I = I { + δl [ I s sin(2β) + I c cos(2β) ] } Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 27 / 58

Reducing the final state equation Extraction of Applying the run conditions of g8b simplifies the final state equation and reduces the number of observables. Linearly polarized photon beam incident on an unpolarized LH2 target. ( Λi =, δ = ) I = I { + δl [ I s sin(2β) + I c cos(2β) ] } I s I c (Σ in the single-meson final state equation) Measuring both for γp p π + π Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 28 / 58

Analysis of γp p π + π Extraction of While γp p π + π is studied, a total of four topologies are kinematically fitted. p π + (π ) p π (π + ) π + π (p) p π + π Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 29 / 58

Theory and Motivation Extraction of Enforces energy-momentum conservation. Varies final state measurements (4-vectors) within resolution limits (errors) of said measurements. Errors (as calculated by the reconstruction code) are extracted from data and used to build the tracking covariance matrix (event by event). Errors are then scaled to actual run-dependent resolutions to make the full covariance matrix. σ 2 Eγ C pp C pλ C pφ C pλ C λλ C λφ C pφ C λφ C φφ........................ C pp k C pλ k C pφ k C pλ C pφ k C λλ k C λφ k C λφ k k C φφ k Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 3 / 58

Theory and Motivation Extraction of Quality of the fit is judged by examining the confidence level and pull distributions. Every diagonal element of the covariance matrix has a pull value associated with it. Systematics affect pull means (µ s), errors contained in the covariance matrix affect pull widths (σ s) and the slope of confidence level plots. Produced using one full run for each coherent edge energy. Produced using one full.3 GeV run. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 3 / 58

Momentum Corrections and Tagger Sag Extraction of Momentum Corrections: Kinematic fitter is highly sensitive to systematic effects good tool for determining momentum corrections. Corrections are needed to account for variations in torus B field and misalignments of Drift Chambers. Determined by examining momentum pull distributions for the proton for γp p π + π fits/events. Correction factor and pulls binning: 7 bins in θlab ( θlab 7 ), 8 bins in φlab 6 bins in momentum (.2 GeV p.7 GeV) Tagger Sag Occurs due to a physical sagging of the support structure for Tagger Hodoscope. Affects the determination of photon energy. Has been seen in several runs in Hall B. Requires energy-dependent correction M. Dugger, C. Hanretty, CLAS-Note 29-3 Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 32 / 58

Check the pull distributions Extraction of µ =.3534 σ =.8 µ = -.473 σ =.22 µ =.545 σ =.997 µ = -.4548 σ =.987 µ =.4893 σ =.2 µ = -.7967 σ =.9942 µ = -.328 σ =.9883 µ = -.898 σ =.24 µ = -.5783 σ =.996 µ = -.2837 σ =.7 γp p π + π (Run #48326) p λ φ Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 33 / 58

Kinematics Theory and Motivation Extraction of The analysis of the (double-meson) γp p π + π channel requires the use of 5 independent kinematic variables: (mpπ or mππ), cosθ p CM, k, cosθ π, φ + π. + Production plane Plane formed by the two pions Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 34 / 58

Extracting I s and I c : φ-distributions Extraction of Three types of (photon) polarization settings were used: PARA PERP AMO PARA PERP Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 35 / 58

Extracting I s and I c : φ-distributions Extraction of Three types of (photon) polarization settings were used: PARA PERP AMO The polarization of the photon beam breaks the usual φ symmetry. Events are plotted as a function of lab angle φ π + for each polarization setting. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 36 / 58

Extracting I s and I c : φ-distributions Extraction of Three types of (photon) polarization settings were used: PARA PERP AMO The polarization of the photon beam breaks the usual φ symmetry. Events are plotted as a function of lab angle φ π + for each polarization setting. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 37 / 58

Extracting I s and I c : Method Extraction of Characteristic: use of AMO φ-distributions. To remove (divide out) the effects of the experimental setup and acceptance, the φ-distributions for PARA and PERP are divided by the AMO φ-distributions (for matching bin combinations). Fit to I = I { + δl [ I s sin(2β) + I c cos(2β) ] } where β = φlab + φpolarization.25 GeV < Eγ.3 GeV - cosθ π + -.9-8 φ π + -62 Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 38 / 58

Extracting I s and I c : Method 2 Extraction of Characteristic: No use of AMO data uses asymmetry between PARA and PERP. Asymmetry between PARA and PERP is formed for matching bin combinations. Fit to: A(k,cosθ π,φ + π ) = PARA PERP + PARA+PERP = I PARA IPERP IPARA + IPERP Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 39 / 58

Extracting I s and I c : Method 2 Extraction of Characteristic: No use of AMO data uses asymmetry between PARA and PERP. Asymmetry between PARA and PERP is formed for matching bin combinations. Fit to: A(k,cosθ π +,φ π + ) = (δ PARA + δ PERP ) I s sin(2β) + (δ PARA + δ PERP ) I c cos(2β) l PARA l PERP l PARA l PERP 2 + (δ PARA δ PERP ) I s sin(2β) + (δ PARA δ PERP ) I c cos(2β) l PARA l PERP l PARA l PERP.25 GeV < Eγ.3 GeV - cosθ π + -.9-8 φ π + -26. GeV < Eγ.5 GeV -.9 cosθ π + -.8 8 φ π + 62 Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 4 / 58

Preliminary Measurement: I s Extraction of.2 GeV < Eγ <.25 GeV -. < cos( θπ + ) < -.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) < -.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) < -.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) < -.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) < -.5.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) < -.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) < -.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) < -.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) < -. - -. < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - -. < cos( θπ + ) <. -. < cos( θπ + ) <.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) <.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) <.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) <.5.5.5.5.5.5 I s -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) <.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) <.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) <.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) <.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - - - - - Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 4 / 58 φ π +

Preliminary Measurement: I s Extraction of.4 GeV < Eγ <.45 GeV -. < cos( θπ + ) < -.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) < -.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) < -.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) < -.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) < -.5.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) < -.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) < -.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) < -.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) < -. - -. < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - -. < cos( θπ + ) <. -. < cos( θπ + ) <.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) <.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) <.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) <.5.5.5.5.5.5 I s -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) <.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) <.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) <.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) <.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - - - - - Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 42 / 58 φ π +

Preliminary Measurement: I s Extraction of.6 GeV < Eγ <.65 GeV -. < cos( θπ + ) < -.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) < -.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) < -.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) < -.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) < -.5.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) < -.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) < -.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) < -.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) < -. - -. < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - -. < cos( θπ + ) <. -. < cos( θπ + ) <.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) <.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) <.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) <.5.5.5.5.5.5 I s -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) <.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) <.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) <.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) <.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - - - - - Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 43 / 58 φ π +

Preliminary Measurement: I c Extraction of.2 GeV < Eγ <.25 GeV -. < cos( θπ + ) < -.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) < -.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) < -.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) < -.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) < -.5.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) < -.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) < -.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) < -.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) < -. - -. < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - -. < cos( θπ + ) <. -. < cos( θπ + ) <.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) <.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) <.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) <.5.5.5.5.5.5 Σ -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) <.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) <.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) <.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) <.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - - - - - Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 44 / 58 φ π +

Preliminary Measurement: I c Extraction of.4 GeV < Eγ <.45 GeV -. < cos( θπ + ) < -.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) < -.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) < -.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) < -.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) < -.5.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) < -.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) < -.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) < -.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) < -. - -. < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - -. < cos( θπ + ) <. -. < cos( θπ + ) <.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) <.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) <.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) <.5.5.5.5.5.5 Σ -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) <.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) <.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) <.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) <.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - - - - - Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 45 / 58 φ π +

Preliminary Measurement: I c Extraction of.6 GeV < Eγ <.65 GeV -. < cos( θπ + ) < -.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) < -.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) < -.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) < -.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) < -.5.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) < -.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) < -.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) < -.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) < -. - -. < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - -. < cos( θπ + ) <. -. < cos( θπ + ) <.2 -.2 < cos( θπ + ) <.3 -.3 < cos( θπ + ) <.4 -.4 < cos( θπ + ) <.5.5.5.5.5.5 Σ -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 < cos( θπ + ) <.6 -.6 < cos( θπ + ) <.7 -.7 < cos( θπ + ) <.8 -.8 < cos( θπ + ) <.9 -.9 < cos( θπ + ) <..5.5.5.5.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 -.5 - - - - - Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 46 / 58 φ π +

Summary Theory and Motivation Extraction of Hadrons form the basis of most matter. These hadrons are systems containing quarks and gluons. Through the study of these systems when excited, the internal dynamics of the hadron may be demystified. Polarization observables are sensitive to these dynamics. Measured for γp p π + π : I c (first for a two-charged-pion final state) I s (first for a two-pion final state) These observable measurements as well as future measurements will aid in the refinement of CQMs as well aid in the revelation of the internal dynamics of the baryon. The FROST experiment will provide access to all 5 observables for a double-meson final state. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 47 / 58

Extraction of END Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 48 / 58

Extraction of Backup Slides Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 49 / 58

Cuts Theory and Motivation Extraction of Vertex -4 cm < zvertex < cm (for all detected particles) All z-vertices must be within 4 cm of each other. Cut on (event) x,y-vertex requiring it originates in the target cell. ns < tvertex < 2 ns (for all detected particles) Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 5 / 58

Cuts Theory and Motivation Extraction of Vertex -4 cm < zvertex < cm (for all detected particles) All z-vertices must be within 4 cm of each other. Cut on (event) x,y-vertex requiring it originates in the target cell. ns < tvertex < 2 ns (for all detected particles) Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 5 / 58

Cuts Theory and Motivation Extraction of Vertex -4 cm < zvertex < cm (for all detected particles) All z-vertices must be within 4 cm of each other. Cut on (event) x,y-vertex requiring it originates in the target cell. ns < tvertex < 2 ns (for all detected particles) Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 52 / 58

Cuts Theory and Motivation Extraction of Photon Energy. GeV < Eγ <.3 GeV.3 GeV < Eγ <.5 GeV.5 GeV < Eγ <.7 GeV.7 GeV < Eγ <.9 GeV.9 GeV < Eγ < 2. GeV Momentum and Angle pproton > 32 MeV/c p π ± > 25 MeV/c θ > θ π ± < 2 Other Cuts Confidence level cut of 5%. ngrf = for all particles. tagrid same for all particles. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 53 / 58

Cuts Theory and Motivation Extraction of Photon Energy. GeV < Eγ <.3 GeV.3 GeV < Eγ <.5 GeV.5 GeV < Eγ <.7 GeV.7 GeV < Eγ <.9 GeV.9 GeV < Eγ < 2. GeV Momentum and Angle pproton > 32 MeV/c p π ± > 25 MeV/c θ > θ π ± < 2 Other Cuts Confidence level cut of 5%. ngrf = for all particles. tagrid same for all particles. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 54 / 58

Cuts Theory and Motivation Extraction of Photon Energy. GeV < Eγ <.3 GeV.3 GeV < Eγ <.5 GeV.5 GeV < Eγ <.7 GeV.7 GeV < Eγ <.9 GeV.9 GeV < Eγ < 2. GeV Momentum and Angle pproton > 32 MeV/c p π ± > 25 MeV/c θ > θ π ± < 2 Other Cuts Confidence level cut of 5%. ngrf = for all particles. tagrid same for all particles. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 55 / 58

Cuts Theory and Motivation Extraction of Photon Energy. GeV < Eγ <.3 GeV.3 GeV < Eγ <.5 GeV.5 GeV < Eγ <.7 GeV.7 GeV < Eγ <.9 GeV.9 GeV < Eγ < 2. GeV Momentum and Angle pproton > 32 MeV/c p π ± > 25 MeV/c θ > θ π ± < 2 Other Cuts Confidence level cut of 5%. ngrf = for all particles. tagrid same for all particles. Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 56 / 58

Examination of the behavior of I s and I c Extraction of The behavior of the measured observables is predicted to be either even (I c ) or odd (I s ) as a function of φ. To check the behavior, measurements were fit with expansions of sine and cosine for each cosθ bin. Contributions from the different terms were examined. f(φ ) = A + Acos(φ ) + A2cos(2φ ) + A3cos(3φ ) + A4cos(4φ ) + A5cos(5φ ) + A6cos(6φ ) + A7cos(7φ ) + A8sin(φ ) Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 57 / 58

Examination of the behavior of I s and I c Extraction of The behavior of the measured observables is predicted to be either even (I c ) or odd (I s ) as a function of φ. To check the behavior, measurements were fit with expansions of sine and cosine for each cosθ bin. Contributions from the different terms were examined. f(φ ) = A + Asin(φ ) + A2sin(2φ ) + A3sin(3φ ) + A4sin(4φ ) + A5sin(5φ ) + A6sin(6φ ) + A7sin(7φ ) + A8cos(φ ) Charles Hanretty (FSU) Measurement of I s and I c for γp p π + π October 3, 2 58 / 58