BAYESIAN PROCESSOR OF ENSEMBLE (BPE): PRIOR DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION

Similar documents
GAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7

Time Series Analysis

WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities

DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR

Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

BAYESIAN PROCESSOR OF OUTPUT FOR PROBABILISTIC FORECASTING OF PRECIPITATION OCCURRENCE. Coire J. Maranzano. Department of Systems Engineering

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE STOCHASTIC HYDROLOGY. Lecture -12 Course Instructor : Prof. P. P. MUJUMDAR Department of Civil Engg., IISc.

TIME SERIES ANALYSIS AND FORECASTING USING THE STATISTICAL MODEL ARIMA

Life Cycle of Convective Systems over Western Colombia

Calculations Equation of Time. EQUATION OF TIME = apparent solar time - mean solar time

Jayalath Ekanayake Jonas Tappolet Harald Gall Abraham Bernstein. Time variance and defect prediction in software projects: additional figures

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

HYDROLOGIC FORECAST PRODUCTS from BAYESIAN FORECASTING SYSTEM

Long-term Water Quality Monitoring in Estero Bay

Hazard assessment based on radar-based rainfall nowcasts at European scale The HAREN project

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS

Climate Change Impact Analysis

Approximating Fixed-Horizon Forecasts Using Fixed-Event Forecasts

Changes in spatial distribution of chub mackerel under climate change: the case study using Japanese purse seine fisheries data in the East China Sea

Determine the trend for time series data

Standardized Anomaly Model Output Statistics Over Complex Terrain.

Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017

Technical note on seasonal adjustment for M0

Pre-Calc Chapter 1 Sample Test. D) slope: 3 4

How to find Sun's GHA using TABLE How to find Sun's Declination using TABLE 4...4

YACT (Yet Another Climate Tool)? The SPI Explorer

Multivariate Regression Model Results

Alterations to the Flat Weight For Age Scale BHA Data Published 22 September 2016

REPORT ON LABOUR FORECASTING FOR CONSTRUCTION

Scarborough Tide Gauge

R&D Research Project: Scaling analysis of hydrometeorological time series data

GTR # VLTs GTR/VLT/Day %Δ:

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

particular regional weather extremes

Average 175, , , , , , ,046 YTD Total 1,098,649 1,509,593 1,868,795 1,418, ,169 1,977,225 2,065,321

Statistical Models for Rainfall with Applications to Index Insura

Average 175, , , , , , ,940 YTD Total 944,460 1,284,944 1,635,177 1,183, ,954 1,744,134 1,565,640

Weak Constraints 4D-Var

Temporal Trends in Forest Fire Season Length

Supplementary appendix

Record date Payment date PID element Non-PID element. 08 Sep Oct p p. 01 Dec Jan p 9.85p

Climate Change and Water Supply Research. Drought Response Workshop October 8, 2013

SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY

SPECIMEN. Date Morning/Afternoon. A Level Geography H481/01 Physical systems Sample Question Paper. Time allowed: 1 hour 30 minutes PMT

Dummy Variables. Susan Thomas IGIDR, Bombay. 24 November, 2008

Computing & Telecommunications Services Monthly Report January CaTS Help Desk. Wright State University (937)

Time Series Analysis of United States of America Crude Oil and Petroleum Products Importations from Saudi Arabia

Technical note on seasonal adjustment for Capital goods imports

AN OVERVIEW OF ENSEMBLE STREAMFLOW PREDICTION STUDIES IN KOREA

Supplementary Figure 1 Annual number of F0-F5 (grey) and F2-F5 (black) tornado observations over 30 years ( ) for Canada and United States.

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

Introduction to TIGGE and GIFS. Richard Swinbank, with thanks to members of GIFS-TIGGE WG & THORPEX IPO

2019 Settlement Calendar for ASX Cash Market Products. ASX Settlement

How are adding integers and subtracting integers related? Work with a partner. Use integer counters to find 4 2. Remove 2 positive counters.

Location. Datum. Survey. information. Etrometa. Step Gauge. Description. relative to Herne Bay is -2.72m. The site new level.

Florida Courts E-Filing Authority Board. Service Desk Report March 2019

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Constructing a typical meteorological year -TMY for Voinesti fruit trees region and the effects of global warming on the orchard ecosystem

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Salem Economic Outlook

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

Evapo-transpiration Losses Produced by Irrigation in the Snake River Basin, Idaho

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

July 2017 LOGISTICAL HARMONY

2.1 Inductive Reasoning Ojectives: I CAN use patterns to make conjectures. I CAN disprove geometric conjectures using counterexamples.

P7.7 A CLIMATOLOGICAL STUDY OF CLOUD TO GROUND LIGHTNING STRIKES IN THE VICINITY OF KENNEDY SPACE CENTER, FLORIDA

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

2015 Fall Conditions Report

Climatography of the United States No

Practice Test Chapter 8 Sinusoidal Functions

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

Mr. XYZ. Stock Market Trading and Investment Astrology Report. Report Duration: 12 months. Type: Both Stocks and Option. Date: Apr 12, 2011

Climatography of the United States No

Predictability of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings in sub-seasonal forecast models

EXAMINATIONS OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY

Dates and Prices ICAEW - Manchester In Centre Programme Prices

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Climatography of the United States No

Atmospheric circulation analysis for seasonal forecasting

FEB DASHBOARD FEB JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

BUSI 460 Suggested Answers to Selected Review and Discussion Questions Lesson 7

Lecture Prepared By: Mohammad Kamrul Arefin Lecturer, School of Business, North South University

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Folsom Dam Water Control Manual Update Joint Federal Project, Folsom Dam

Transcription:

BAYESIAN PROCESSOR OF ENSEMBLE (BPE): PRIOR DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION Parametric Models and Estimation Procedures Tested on Temperature Data By Roman Krzysztofowicz and Nah Youn Lee University of Virginia 4 December 2008 Acknowledgments: Work supported by NSF, Grant No. ATM-0641572. Data provided by Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NWS/NOAA.

DATA Predictand: 2m temperature at 12 UTC Forecast time: 00 UTC Location: Savannah, GA Actual Location: 32º 8'N / 81º 13'W Climatic Data: 32.5º N / 80º W Data Climatic Data: 1 January 1959 31 December 1998 (40 years) 29 February (leap year) excluded 5 March 1997 filled in

PRIOR DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION k index of the day (k = 1,, 365) l lead time in days (l = 1, 2,, 16) W k predictand (variate) w k realization of W k Prior Marginal D. F. G k (w k ) = P(W k w k ) Prior Markov D. F. H kl (w k w k l ) = P(W k w k W k l = w k l ) Prior D. F. Climatic Probabilistic Forecast Challenges Reference for calibration of ensemble Limit to which calibrated ensemble converges as LT Time series W 1,, W 365 is nonstationary Distributions G k and H kl are non-gaussian

STANDARDIZATION Purpose: obtain time series that has stationary mean, variance, marginal D.F. (possibly) Climatic sample for each day k (k = 1,, 365) 15-day sampling window centered on day k w k n : n 1,...,M M = 15 days x 40 years = 600 Sample estimates m k prior (climatic) mean s k prior (climatic) standard deviation Standardized climatic sample w k n w k n m k s k n 1,...,M w k n : n 1,...,M

Sample deciles in original space (15-day window), SAV 300 Temperature ( K) 290 280 270 0 100 200 300 Day Maximum 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Minimum

Sample mean (15-day), Fourier series (2 nd order), SAV 298 296 Mean (degree K) 294 292 290 288 286 284 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Day

5.5 Sample std. dev. (15-day), Fourier series (2 nd order), SAV 5 Standard Deviation (degree K) 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Day

Sample deciles in standard space (15-day window), SAV 4 3 2 Standardized Temperature 1 0-1 -2-3 -4-5 -6 0 100 200 300 Day Maximum 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Minimum

PRIOR MARGINAL D.F. in Standard Space Two alternative hypotheses (tested empirically) 1. Nonstationary Prior (estimate 12 parametric D.F.) 48 = 4 x 12 parameters + interpolation (=> 365 D.F.) MAD across 12 samples (1 Jan,, 1 Dec): 12 (min), 24 (average), 39 (max) 2. Stationary Prior (estimate 1 parametric D.F.) 4 parameters (=> 365 D.F.) MAD across 12 samples (1 Jan,, 1 Dec): 38 (min), 53 (average), 65 (max) MAD = max Empirical D. F. Parametric D. F.

Prior Marginal D. F.: Analyses 0. Given: standardized climatic sample for day k w k n : n 1,...,M M = 600 12 days k (1 Jan,..., 1Dec) 1. Hypothesize several parametric models for 2. Estimate parameters of each model 3. Choose model that minimizes average (across k): MAD = max Empirical D. F. Parametric D. F. Model: G k G w 1 exp 1 ln ln U L U w 1 Parameters:,, L, U

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Jan (k = 1) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 277 α = 971 β = 3.5186 η L = -4.0396 η U = 2.3533 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Feb (k = 32) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 201 α = 467 β = 3.0885 η L = -3.4939 η U = 2.3624 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Mar (k = 60) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 236 α = 139 β = 3.0467 η L = -3.6945 η U = 2.1512 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Apr (k = 91) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 234 α = 974 β = 3.3631 η L = -3.7663 η U = 2.2657 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 May (k = 121) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 387 α = 703 β = 3.3851 η L = -3.4261 η U = 2.2486 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Jun (k = 152) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 199 α = 259 β = 5.2807 η L = -5.7415 η U = 2.1794 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Jul (k = 182) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 289 α = 362 β = 4.2803 η L = -4.5610 η U = 2.9318 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Aug (k = 213) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 185 α = 738 β = 4.2969 η L = -4.1051 η U = 3.2253 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Sep (k = 244) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 115 α = 015 β = 4.7956 η L = -5.0532 η U = 2.7160 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Oct (k = 274) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 249 α = 507 β = 3.7870 η L = -4.0384 η U = 2.1044 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Nov (k = 305) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 242 α = 238 β = 3.2029 η L = -3.8365 η U = 2.1703 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Empirical and Parametric Distribution Functions on 1 Dec (k = 335) (M = 600), SAV MAD: 262 α = 528 β = 2.8569 η L = -3.3537 η U = 2.2668 P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Prior Marginal D. F. : Conclusions Small diversity of empirical D. F. Large similarity of parametric D. F. Near-stationarity of parameters,, L, U

Empirical Distribution Functions: the two most diverse on 1 Jun (k = 152) and 1 Dec (k = 335) (M = 600), SAV 1 Jun 1 Dec P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Parametric Distribution Functions on First Day of Each Month (M = 600), SAV Distribution P(W ' k w ' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Time-series distribution parameters: First of Each Month (M = 600), SAV Distribution 6 5 Alpha Beta EtaL EtaU 4 3 Parameter Value 2 1-0 -1-2 -3-4 -5-6 0 100 200 300 400 Day

Stationary Prior Marginal D.F. in Standard Space 1. Form a pooled standardized climatic sample from several days 2. Determine bounds from the grand sample (365 days, 40 years) L U min w k n k,n max w k n k,n 3. Estimate stationary D.F. from the pooled sample G w, L w U stationary parameters:,, L, U

Stationary Prior Marginal Distribution Functions: Empirical and Parametric, SAV Pooled Sample from 4 Days: 1 Jan, 1 Apr, 1 Jul, 1 Oct (M = 2400) MAD: 139 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η L = -5.8833 η U = 3.3777 P(W ' w' ) -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 1 2 3 4 Standardized Temperature w'

Prior Marginal D.F. for day k in Original Space 0. Given: prior mean and standard deviation m k, s k stationary parameters 1. Construct,, L, U G k w G w m k s k Lk w Uk Lk L s k m k Uk U s k m k

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Jan (k = 1) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 455 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 256.18 η Uk = 302.89 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Feb (k = 32) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 464 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 254.23 η Uk = 301.90 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Mar (k = 60) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 588 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 258.07 η Uk = 302.60 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Apr (k = 91) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 421 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 269.31 η Uk = 301 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 May (k = 121) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 604 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 277.76 η Uk = 304 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Jun (k = 152) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 592 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 286.01 η Uk = 301.80 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Jul (k = 182) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 652 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 291.76 η Uk = 301.61 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Aug (k = 213) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 583 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 294.14 η Uk = 301.30 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Sep (k = 244) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 382 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 291.45 η Uk = 301.57 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Oct (k = 274) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 580 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 285 η Uk = 303.28 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Nov (k = 305) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 432 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 275 η Uk = 302.83 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Empirical Distribution Function on 1 Dec (k = 335) (M = 600), SAV Parametric Distribution Function from Pooled Sample from 4 Days MAD: 620 α = 659 β = 5.4736 η Lk = 267 η Uk = 303.57 P(W k w ) 260 270 280 290 300 Temperature w ( K)

Stationary Prior Marginal D.F.: Conclusions Sampling Window: 5 15 days (200 600 realizations) 15-day => empirical D. F. smoother, tails better delineated Pooled Sample Size M = 2400, 4 days, MAD = 14 M = 3600, 6 days, MAD = 14 M = 7200, 12 days, MAD = 11 Families of Good Parametric D.F. Bounded: (Weibull, Log-Logistic) Bounded Above: (Weibull, Log-Logistic)

CLIMATIC AUTOCORRELATION W k ' standardized predictand G' prior marginal D. F. (stationary) V k normalized predictand Q standard normal D. F. Normal Quantile Transform (NQT) V k = Q 1 (G'(W k ')) Autocorrelation coefficient (Pearson s product-moment) c k = Cor(V k 1, V k ) k = 1,, 365 *Note: Standardization does not make c k stationary

Autocorrelation Autocorrelation in normal in normal space space (15-day), Fourier series series (8th order), (8 th order), SAV SAV 5 5 Correlation 5 5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Day

Prior Markov D. F. for day k in Original Space k day for which forecast is made (k = 1,, 365) l lead time in days (l = 1, 2,, 14) k l day of the last observation (forecast day) 0. Given: prior marginal D. F. G k, G k l autocorrelation coefficient c k 1. Construct H kl w k w k l Q Q 1 G k w k c k l Q 1 G k l w k l 1 c k 2l 1/2