MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions

Similar documents
Systems Analysis and Control

Systems Analysis and Control

Systems Analysis and Control

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review

ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques

Systems Analysis and Control

Stability of CL System

Stability of Feedback Control Systems: Absolute and Relative

Systems Analysis and Control

Today (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10

Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications

(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)

Course Summary. The course cannot be summarized in one lecture.

Dynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.

Exercise 1 (A Non-minimum Phase System)

16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2

Automatic Control (TSRT15): Lecture 7

Lecture 5: Frequency domain analysis: Nyquist, Bode Diagrams, second order systems, system types

Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering

Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014

Chemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

Chapter 2 SDOF Vibration Control 2.1 Transfer Function

Basic Procedures for Common Problems

FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN

Introduction. Performance and Robustness (Chapter 1) Advanced Control Systems Spring / 31

MAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008

Tradeoffs and Limits of Performance

Automatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year

IC6501 CONTROL SYSTEMS

D(s) G(s) A control system design definition

DIGITAL CONTROLLER DESIGN

Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method

Control of Manufacturing Processes

STABILITY. Have looked at modeling dynamic systems using differential equations. and used the Laplace transform to help find step and impulse

INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL

Lecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30

EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.

r + - FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic

Answers to multiple choice questions

Index. Index. More information. in this web service Cambridge University Press

Introduction to Process Control

Intro to Frequency Domain Design

STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTOL SYSTEMS

R a) Compare open loop and closed loop control systems. b) Clearly bring out, from basics, Force-current and Force-Voltage analogies.

VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur

Classify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.

Robust Control 3 The Closed Loop

STABILITY ANALYSIS. Asystemmaybe stable, neutrallyormarginallystable, or unstable. This can be illustrated using cones: Stable Neutral Unstable

Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS

Stability & Compensation

Exam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING

Some of the different forms of a signal, obtained by transformations, are shown in the figure. jwt e z. jwt z e

Lecture 12. AO Control Theory

MEM 355 Performance Enhancement of Dynamical Systems

ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design

Active Control? Contact : Website : Teaching

MAE 142 Homework #2 (Design Project) SOLUTIONS. (a) The main body s kinematic relationship is: φ θ ψ. + C 3 (ψ) 0 + C 3 (ψ)c 1 (θ)

Dr Ian R. Manchester

Due Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5

Table of Laplacetransform

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

Dynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis

The loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)

Systems Analysis and Control

Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Root Locus

ECEN 607 (ESS) Op-Amps Stability and Frequency Compensation Techniques. Analog & Mixed-Signal Center Texas A&M University

Topic # Feedback Control Systems

Video 5.1 Vijay Kumar and Ani Hsieh

ECE 486 Control Systems

Discrete Systems. Step response and pole locations. Mark Cannon. Hilary Term Lecture

Chapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control

Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems

Dynamic System Response. Dynamic System Response K. Craig 1

CDS 101/110: Lecture 10.3 Final Exam Review

ECE317 : Feedback and Control

ESE319 Introduction to Microelectronics. Feedback Basics

6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.

CDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design

100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =

Linear Control Systems Lecture #3 - Frequency Domain Analysis. Guillaume Drion Academic year

Frequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability

EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems

x(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!

Digital Control Systems

Chapter 9: Controller design

Systems Analysis and Control

Topic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback

Introduction to Feedback Control

CHBE320 LECTURE V LAPLACE TRANSFORM AND TRANSFER FUNCTION. Professor Dae Ryook Yang

R10 JNTUWORLD B 1 M 1 K 2 M 2. f(t) Figure 1

FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS

Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control

Richiami di Controlli Automatici

Positioning Servo Design Example

Appendix A: Exercise Problems on Classical Feedback Control Theory (Chaps. 1 and 2)

Radar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.

Transcription:

MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions Question 1. SIGNALS: Design of a noise-cancelling headphone system. 1a. Based on the low-pass filter given, design a high-pass filter, F H (s), with a cutoff frequency of ω H. F H (s) = 1 [(ω H /s) 2 + 0.75(ω H /s)+1][(ω H /s) 2 + 1.85(ω H /s)+1]. (1a) Express this filter as a rational function of s. F H (s) = s 4 [s 2 + 0.75ω H s+ω 2 H ][s2 + 1.85ω H s+ω 2 (1b) H ]. 1b. Combining the low-pass and high-pass filters, describe how a band-pass filter, F B (s), may be constructed. Put the low-pass and high-pass filters in series to make a band-pass filter. (1c) Should you add them or multiply them? why? You should multiply them, because they are being applied in series (just like we multiply D(s) and G(s), which also appear in series). (1d) Compute the single rational transfer function of the necessary band-pass filter, F B (s). F B (s) = F L (s) F H (s) = s 4 [(s/ω L ) 2 + 0.75(s/ω L )+1][(s/ω L ) 2 + 1.85(s/ω L )+1][s 2 + 0.75ω H s+ω 2 H ][s2 + 1.85ω H s+ω 2 H ] (1e) 1c. Now specify how you should select ω L and ω H. You may take ω L to be about 3000 Hz and ω H to be about 2000 Hz to form the desired band-pass filter. Actually, since both F L (s) and F H (s) mess up the phase of the signal near their respective cutoff frequencies (that is, no linear filter is ideal...), it is preferable to make ω L a tad higher than this, and ω H a tad lower than this. (1f) 1d. You notice that the mic is about 1 cm closer to the sound source than the speaker, and that the speed of sound is about v = 350 m/s. Assuming a purely sinusoidal tone at f = 2500 Hz [and, thus, a sinusoid with a wavelength of λ = v/ f = 0.14m), about how much phase change will this cause? It will cause about (1/14) 360 = 26 of phase lead. (1g) What kind of compensation can you apply in your circuit to correct for this? You can apply a bit of lag compensation, with D(s) = (s + z)/(s + p) with p < z, taking p/z 3 and pz = 2500 Hz = 2500 2π rad/sec. This better synchronizes the phase of the output from the speaker with the audio signal it is designed to cancel, which takes a while to travel from the microphone to the speaker. (1h) Question 2. SYSTEMS: Linearizing the dynamics of a pendulum. The nonlinear equations of motion of a pendulum are ml 2 d2 θ dt 2 = u mglsin(θ). 2a. If the pendulum is held at a constant angle θ, calculate the corresponding equilibrium value of the torque u. u = mgl sin(θ) Note also that dθ/dt = 0. (2a)

2 MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions 2b. Assuming that the perturbation quantities {θ,u } are small, linearize the full nonlinear equations of motion about the equilibrium condition. (sin identity) (small angle approximation) (equilibrium condition) (rearrange) Compute the linear transfer function from U (s) to Θ (s). dt 2 = (u+u ) mglsin(θ+θ ) dt 2 = (u+u ) mgl{sin(θ)cos(θ )+cos(θ)sin(θ )} dt 2 = (u+u ) mgl{sin(θ) 1+cos(θ) θ ]} ml 2 d2 (θ ) dt 2 = u mglcos(θ) θ [ ] d 2 dt 2 + a 0 θ = b 0 u where a 0 = g l cos(θ), b 0 = 1 ml 2 Θ (s) U (s) = b 0 s 2 + a 0 Assuming m = 1 kg, l = 1 m, and g = 9.8 m/s 2, where are the poles and/or zeros of this transfer function? Two poles at ± a 0 = ± g cos(θ)/l. 2c. If θ = 0: Two zeros at infinity (a.k.a. the resaurant at the end of the universe). u = 0, two poles at ±iω d = ±i 9.8, two zeros at infinity. System is neutrally stable because of the poles on the imaginary axis. The impulse response is a sinusoidal oscillation at frequency ω d that neither grows nor decays. (2b) (2c) (2d) (2e) 2d. If θ = π/4: u = mgl.707, two poles at ±iω d = ±i.707 9.8, two zeros at infinity. System is neutrally stable because of the poles on the imaginary axis. The impulse response is a sinusoidal oscillation at frequency ω d that neither grows nor decays. (2f) 2e. If θ = π/2: u = mgl, two poles at the origin (a double integrator!), two zeros at infinity. System is neutrally stable because of the poles on the imaginary axis. By taking the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s) = G(s) U(s) = (1/s 2 ) 1, the impulse response is seen to be a unit ramp, y(t) = t for t > 0. (2g) 2f. If θ = 3π/4: u = mgl.707, two poles at ±.707 9.8, two zeros at infinity. System is unstable stable because of the pole in the RHP. The impulse response is a diverging exponential (plus a converging exponential). (2h) 2g. If θ = π: u = 0, two poles at ± 9.8, two zeros at infinity. System is unstable stable because of the pole in the RHP. The impulse response is a diverging exponential (plus a converging exponential). (2i)

MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions 3 Question 3. (& CONTROL): Root locus and Bode tools in classical control design. Consider the unstable system G(s) = Y(s) U(s) = 1 (s 1)(s+10). 3a. Taking D(s) =, rewrite H(s) = G(s)D(s)/[1 + G(s)D(s)] as a rational function of s: H(s) = +(s 1)(s+10) = s 2 + 9s+( 10) = (s+z + )(s+z ). (3a) Compute the exact pole locations of the closed-loop system: z ± = [ 9 ± 81 4( 10)]/2. (3b) 3b. Taking D(s) =, accurately plot the root locus plot: Note that the pair of closed-loop poles move in from the open-loop poles [that is, from z ± = ( 9 ± 121)/2 = ( 9 ± 11)/2 = { 10,1}] for small, along the real axis to z ± = ( 9 ± 0)/2 = 4.5 (i.e., both at the midpoint between the open-loop poles) for = 81/4+10 = 30.25, and then move out along the vertical line directly above and below this midpoint location to z ± = ( 9 ± i 4( 10) 81)/2 for > 30.25. The resulting plot is thus given below. (3c) 10 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 15 10 5 0 5 3c. Is proportional control sufficient to stabilize the system? Compute the minimum value of necessary to stabilize the system. Yes. > 10 moves both poles into the LHP. (3d) 3d. If is selected to achieve the fastest rise time possible while keeping M p 5%, where would the closed-loop poles be? What is the natural frequency ω n of these poles? At s = 4.5 ± 4.5i, as marked above, with ζ = 0.707 and ω n = 4.5 2 + 4.5 2 6.4. (3e) [This is achieved with 50.5.] 3e. The open-loop system G(s)D(s) has two more poles than zeros. Explain where the other two zeros of this system are, in terms of the intuitive mapping of the complex plane introduced by Riemann. The other two zeros are effectively at infinity in the extended complex plane. When the extended complex plane is mapped onto the Riemann sphere, with the origin mapped to the south pole, the point at infinity is mapped to the north pole (a.k.a. the Restaurant at the End of the Universe). (3f)

4 MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions 3f. Sketch the Bode plot corresponding to G(s). If proportional control D(s) = is applied with the gain adjusted to give a crossover frequency ω c = 5 rad/sec, what is the approximate phase margin in the closed-loop system? What value of achieves this crossover frequency? 10 0 10 2 10 4 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Noting the Bode plotting rules for both unstable poles as well as stable poles, the Bode plot is given above. Note that the slope goes from 0 to -1 to -2, and the phase gives a bump akin to that of a lead compensator, with a maximum of 55 of phase lead. To get crossover at ω c = 5 rad/sec, the gain should set as follows: G(iω c )D(iω c ) = iω c 1 iω c + 10 = 1 = 1 26 125 57. Crossover is not quite at the peak of the bump in the phase, resulting in a PM of only about 50. (3g) 3g. Noting the approximate design guides available in the root locus and Bode settings, explain how these two interpretations are consistent. In the root locus plot, we saw that θ = 45 ζ = sin(θ).7, and thus we expected M p 5%. In the Bode plot, we saw that PM = 50, and thus ζ PM/100 =.5; we will thus expected a bit more overshoot with this design (M p 15%). Significantly, note that these design guides are only approximate!! (3h)

MAE143a: Signals & Systems (& Control) Final Exam (2011) solutions 5 Question 4. I want my... I want my PID! (or not...) A PID compensator may be written ( D PID (s) = p 1+ 1 ) T I s + T s 2 + s Ds = p T D s where = p T D and, usually, T I > T D. T D + T 1 I T D = (s+z +)(s+z ), s 4a. Assuming T I T D, calculate simple expressions for z + and z, and draw the corresponding Bode plot. z ± = 1 [ 1 ± ] 1 4T D /T I 1 [ ] { 1 1 ±(1 2T D /T I ) =, 1 } 2T D 2T D T I T D The Bode plot of D PID (s) is given below. (4a) 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 100 50 0 50 100 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 4b. If there is noise entering the system with very high freqeuncy components, describe the problem with using this type of compensator. High frequencies are amplified a lot in the loop due to the derivative compensation of the PID. We would thus drive our actuators hard (burning them out) while chasing high frequency noise. (4b) 4c. How serious of a problem are delays when closing feedback loops? Use what you know about Pade expansions of e ds to explain clearly what the problem with delays is all about. Delays are a significant problem when closing control loops. Interpreting the Laplace transform e ds of the delay function δ σ (t d) using a Pade approximation, there are poles in the LHP and zeros in the RHP. Recalling that the root locus goes from the open-loop poles to the open-loop zeros, increasing the feedback gain too far can thus lead to closed-loop instability. (4c) 4d. Describe how you can tune three of the compensators developed in class in order to perform more deliberate loop shaping on the Bode plot than is possible with a PID compensator: which would you use where, and why? 0. Select the target ω c based on a rise time (ω c = 1.8/t r ) or bandwidth (ω c = ω BW /1.4) constraint. 1. Apply lead compensation near ω c to give adequate PM to meet the overshoot constraint. 2. Apply lag compensation well below ω c to boost up low-freqeuncy gain to get good tracking. 3. Apply a low-pass filter well above ω c to provide adequate disturbance rejection. Finally, select such that crossover actually occurs at ω c. (4d)