Representation theory and the X-ray transform

Similar documents
Background on c-projective geometry

Representation theory and the X-ray transform

The X-ray transform on projective space

Conformally Fedosov Manifolds

Conformally invariant differential operators

Invariant differential operators on the sphere

Conformal and CR Geometry from the Parabolic Viewpoint

Parabolic geometry in five dimensions

A relative version of Kostant s theorem

OVERDETERMINED SYSTEMS, CONFORMAL DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, AND THE BGG COMPLEX

Quaternionic Complexes

Invariant calculus for parabolic geometries

The gap phenomenon in parabolic geometries

How to recognize a conformally Kähler metric

Projective space and twistor theory

Flag Manifolds and Representation Theory. Winter School on Homogeneous Spaces and Geometric Representation Theory

Classification problems in conformal geometry

Subcomplexes in Curved BGG Sequences

How to recognise the geodesics of a metric connection

Contents. Chapter 3. Local Rings and Varieties Rings of Germs of Holomorphic Functions Hilbert s Basis Theorem 39.

Conformal geometry and twistor theory

Symmetries of Parabolic Geometries

From holonomy reductions of Cartan geometries to geometric compactifications

How to recognise a conformally Einstein metric?

ESSENTIAL KILLING FIELDS OF PARABOLIC GEOMETRIES: PROJECTIVE AND CONFORMAL STRUCTURES. 1. Introduction

Geometry of symmetric R-spaces

k=0 /D : S + S /D = K 1 2 (3.5) consistently with the relation (1.75) and the Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch-Atiyah-Singer index formula

Math 550 / David Dumas / Fall Problems

H-projective structures and their applications

Holography of BGG-Solutions

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 16 Oct 2017

Gaps, Symmetry, Integrability

Rigid Schubert classes in compact Hermitian symmetric spaces

Comparison for infinitesimal automorphisms. of parabolic geometries

A COMPLEX FROM LINEAR ELASTICITY. Michael Eastwood

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 2 Dec 2014

PREFACE TO THE DOVER EDITION

Submanifolds of. Total Mean Curvature and. Finite Type. Bang-Yen Chen. Series in Pure Mathematics Volume. Second Edition.

ALMOST COMPLEX PROJECTIVE STRUCTURES AND THEIR MORPHISMS

The X-ray transform: part II

AFFINE SPHERES AND KÄHLER-EINSTEIN METRICS. metric makes sense under projective coordinate changes. See e.g. [10]. Form a cone (1) C = s>0

Projective parabolic geometries

Self-dual conformal gravity

Introduction to Differential Geometry

Some Elliptic and Subelliptic Complexes from Geometry

Hyperkähler geometry lecture 3

Published as: J. Geom. Phys. 10 (1993)

The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria

Linear connections on Lie groups

Projective Parabolic Geometry. Riemannian, Kähler and Quaternion-Kähler Metrics

Symplectic geometry of deformation spaces

A PROOF OF BOREL-WEIL-BOTT THEOREM

Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces

A PIERI RULE FOR HERMITIAN SYMMETRIC PAIRS. Thomas J. Enright, Markus Hunziker and Nolan R. Wallach

Differential complexes for the Grushin distributions

Invariance Theory, the Heat Equation, and the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem

Foundation Modules MSc Mathematics. Winter Term 2018/19

THE QUANTUM CONNECTION

arxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 7 Feb 2007

Metrisability of Painleve equations and Hamiltonian systems of hydrodynamic type

arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 18 Jun 2014

Modern Geometric Structures and Fields

CONFORMAL CIRCLES AND PARAMETRIZATIONS OF CURVES IN CONFORMAL MANIFOLDS

About polynomiality of the Poisson semicentre for parabolic subalgebras

SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS, GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION, AND UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS OF LIE GROUPS. 1. Introduction

Highest-weight Theory: Verma Modules

Sheaf cohomology and non-normal varieties

Symplectic varieties and Poisson deformations

Defining equations for some nilpotent varieties

Theorem 2. Let n 0 3 be a given integer. is rigid in the sense of Guillemin, so are all the spaces ḠR n,n, with n n 0.

Lecture 5 - Lie Algebra Cohomology II

Fixed Point Theorem and Character Formula

Transparent connections

Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations

Mostow Rigidity. W. Dison June 17, (a) semi-simple Lie groups with trivial centre and no compact factors and

The Calabi Conjecture

Characteristic classes and Invariants of Spin Geometry

The Geometry behind Nongeometric Fluxes

Morse Theory and Applications to Equivariant Topology

V = 1 2 (g ijχ i h j ) (2.4)

The Grothendieck-Katz Conjecture for certain locally symmetric varieties

Infinitesimal Einstein Deformations. Kähler Manifolds

SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS

ARCHIVUM MATHEMATICUM (BRNO) Tomus 42 (2006), Supplement,

Tilting exotic sheaves, parity sheaves on affine Grassmannians, and the Mirković Vilonen conjecture

arxiv: v3 [math.dg] 13 Mar 2011

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 16 Nov 2017

Fundamentals of Differential Geometry

arxiv:alg-geom/ v1 29 Jul 1993

12 Geometric quantization

Eigenvalue problem for Hermitian matrices and its generalization to arbitrary reductive groups

Introduction to the Baum-Connes conjecture

Lectures on the Orbit Method

Peter Hochs. Strings JC, 11 June, C -algebras and K-theory. Peter Hochs. Introduction. C -algebras. Group. C -algebras.

AXIOMATIC AND COORDINATE GEOMETRY

Differential Geometry of Warped Product. and Submanifolds. Bang-Yen Chen. Differential Geometry of Warped Product Manifolds. and Submanifolds.

1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.

Chow rings of Complex Algebraic Groups

On the Harish-Chandra Embedding

Moment map flows and the Hecke correspondence for quivers

Transcription:

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 1/15 Representation theory and the X-ray transform Projective differential geometry Michael Eastwood Australian National University

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 2/15 Summary of Lecture 1 Curvature onrp n R abcd = g ac g bd g bc g ad Curvature oncp n R abcd = g ac g bd g bc g ad + J ac J bd J bc J ad + 2J ab J cd Model embeddings µ :RP n CP n totally geodesic 2-form lemma µ ψ ab = 0 µ ψ ab = 0 Curvature lemma µ ψ abcd = 0 µ ψ abcd = 0 This Lecture! [a b] µ c = g c[a µ b]

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 3/15 Topics Tractor bundle and connection onrp n Projective differential geometry Projective tractor bundles and connections Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolutions onrp n Lie algebra cohomology Range of the Killing operator Higher Killing operators

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 4/15 Tractors on real projective space Consider the connection ont Λ 0 Λ 1 given by [ ] [ ] σ a a σ µ a a µ b + g ab σ µ b Calculate a b [a b] σ µ c σ = b σ µ b a b µ c + g bc σ a ( b σ µ b ) b µ a g ba σ = a ( b µ c + g bc σ)+g ac ( b σ µ b ) = 0 [a b] µ c g c[a µ = 0 b] 0 Flat! µ c

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 5/15 Projective differential geometry Suppose a and ˆ a are torsion-free affine connections. Def n a and ˆ a are projectively equivalent iff they have the same geodesics (as unparameterised curves). EG The round sphere is projectively flat by central projection Affine coördinate patch R n RP n is a projective equivalence

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 6/15 Projective tractors Can always choose a s.t. R ab is symmetric Then define a connection ont Λ 0 Λ 1 by [ ] [ ] σ a µ b a σ µ a a µ b + P ab σ It is projectively invariant (T.Y. Thomas) P ab 1 n 1 R ab Equivalent to a Cartan connection (É. Cartan) It is flat iff a is projectively flat Hence the flat tractor connection onrp n NB:RP n is a homogeneous space SL(n+1,R)/P

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 7/15 Back to real projective space RecallT Λ 0 Λ 1 with its flat connection. Thus,V Λ 2 T=Λ 1 Λ 2 also has a flat connection [ ] [ ] σb a a σ b µ ab. µ bc a µ bc + g ab σ c g ac σ b V Λ 1 V Λ 2 V Λ 3 V Λ 1 Λ 1 Λ 1 Λ 2 Λ 1 Λ 3 Λ 1 NB Λ 2 Λ 1 Λ 2 Λ 2 Λ 2 Λ 3 Λ 2 Λ p Λ 2 µ a bcd µ [a bc]d Λ p+1 Λ 1

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 8/15 Decompose into irreducibles Λ 1 V Λ 2 V Λ 3 V V Lie algebra cohomology! (Kostant 1961) EG: ker :Λ 2 Λ 2 Λ 3 Λ 1 ={ψ abcd =ψ [ab][cd] s.t.ψ [abc]d = 0} ={Riemann curvature tensors}! Suspend disbelief

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 9/15 BGG resolutions Diagram chasing locally exact complexes Riemannian deformation (2) Λ 0 d Λ 1 d Λ 2 d Λ 3 d Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand resolutions. de Rham RP n = SL(n+1,R)/ = G/P, 0. 0 where G is semisimple and P is parabolic.

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 10/15 Lie algebra cohomology u=lie algebra V=u-module 0 V Hom(u,V) Hom(Λ 2 u,v) v(x)= Xv φ(x Y)=φ([X, Y]) Xφ(Y)+Yφ(X) H p (u,v) sl(n+1,r). g=g 1 g 0 g 1 Letu=g 1 ( u =g 1 ) LetV=Λ 2 R n+1 g 1 0 V g 1 V Λ 2 g 1 V

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 11/15 Geometric import Kostant s Bott-Borel-Weil Theorem = H p (g 1,V)=,,, as SL(n,R)-modules 0 V g 1 V Λ 2 g 1 V Λ 3 g 1 V 0 V Λ 1 V Λ 2 V Λ 3 V Λ 1 Λ 1 Λ 1 Λ 2 Λ 1 Λ 3 Λ 1 ր ր ր Λ 2 Λ 1 Λ 2 Λ 2 Λ 2 Λ 3 Λ 2 Previously suspected tensor identities are justified!!

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 12/15 Back to BGG de Rham Λ 0 d Λ 1 d Λ 2 φ a φ ω a [a ω b] OnRP n for n 2, ω a = a φ [a ω b] = 0 Riemannian deformation φ a (a φ b) = Killing (2) φ a (a φ b) ω ab π( (a c) ω bd + g ac ω bd ) ω ab = (a φ b) π( (a c) ω bd + g ac ω bd )=0, where π(φ acbd =Φ [ab][cd] )

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 13/15 Higher Killing operators φ bc =φ (bc) (a φ bc) prolong using Lie algebra cohomology Λ 1 V Λ 2 V V ր ր ր ր BGG (3)

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 14/15 Summary Range of Killing operators onrp n for n 2 ω a = a φ π( a ω b )= [a ω b] = 0 ω ab = (a φ b) π( (a c) ω bd + g ac ω bd )=0 ω abc = (a φ bc) π( (a c e) ω bd f + 4g (ac e) ω bd f )=0 Combinatorics 1 1 1 1 4 1 10 9 1 20 64 1 35 259 225 1 56 784 2304......... 1 84 1974 12916 11025........

AMSI Summer School on Integral Geometry and Imaging at the University of New England, Lecture 2 p. 15/15 THANK YOU END Of PART TWO