X-raying High-Redshift AGNs and the First Black Holes: From Chandra to Lynx

Similar documents
Results from the Chandra Deep Field North

Surveys for high-redshift (z>6) AGN with AXIS (cf. Athena) James Aird. University of Cambridge (-> University of Leicester)

X ray Survey Results on AGN Physics and Evolution Niel Brandt

The quest for early Black Holes

The quest for Type 2 quasars: What are the X-ray observations of optically selected QSOs2 telling us?

Compton-thick AGN. SWIFT/BAT 70 month survey (+ CDFS 7Ms + models) I. Georgantopoulos National Observatory of Athens

AGN Selec)on Techniques. Kris)n Kulas Astro 278 Winter 2012

Cosmology The Road Map

The History of Active Galaxies A.Barger, P. Capak, L. Cowie, RFM, A. Steffen, and Y. Yang

WFIRST and JWST synergies in the study of First Light. M. Stiavelli STScI, Baltimore

The bolometric output of AGN in the XMM-COSMOS survey

The Contribution of Active Galactic Nuclei to the Excess Cosmic Radio Background at 1.4 GHz

Identifying distant* hidden monsters with NuSTAR

Physics of the hot evolving Universe

GALAXIES. Edmund Hodges-Kluck Andrew Ptak

Galaxy Clusters in Stage 4 and Beyond

Scientific cases for Simbol-X of interest of the Italian community

Extended Chandra Multi-Wavelength Project (ChaMPx): Source Catalog and Applications

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Science with the Intermediate Layer

The Hot and Energetic Universe

Solving. Andrey Kravtsov The University of Chicago Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics

The growth and evolution of super massive black holes

The first black holes

Background Picture: Millennium Simulation (MPA); Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma satellite (P. Predehl 2011)

The Chandra COSMOS X-ray Survey

XRBs in Star-forming Galaxies X-ray Luminosity Functions Ultra-Luminous X-ray Sources

Chandra: the Next Decade

The Correlation Between the Hard-X-ray Photon Index and the Accretion Rate in AGN: Probing Black-Hole Growth Across Cosmic Time

Black Holes and Active Galactic Nuclei

Extragalactic Surveys: Prospects from Herschel-PACS

Lecture 11: SDSS Sources at Other Wavelengths: From X rays to radio. Astr 598: Astronomy with SDSS

Obscured AGN. I. Georgantopoulos National Observatory of Athens

BUILDING GALAXIES. Question 1: When and where did the stars form?

Clusters of Galaxies with Euclid

High Redshift Universe

Wide- Field X- ray Surveys Stefano Borgani INAF OA Trieste Dept. of Physics Univ. Trieste

Searching for black holes in nearby galaxies with Simbol-X

Lyα-Emitting Galaxies at z=3.1: L* Progenitors Experiencing Rapid Star Formation

Part 2. Hot gas halos and SMBHs in optically faint ellipticals. Part 3. After Chandra?

ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI: FROM THE CENTRAL BLACK HOLE TO THE GALACTIC ENVIRONMENT

Advanced Telescope for High Energy Astrophysics

What Can We Learn from Galaxy Clustering 1: Why Galaxy Clustering is Useful for AGN Clustering. Alison Coil UCSD

The Bright Side of the X-ray Sky The XMM-Newton Bright Survey. R. Della Ceca. INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera,Milan

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 6 Dec 1999

Coronal geometry at low mass- accretion rates from XMM and NuSTAR spectra. Felix Fürst Caltech for the NuSTAR AGN physics and binaries teams

Gamma-Ray Astronomy. Astro 129: Chapter 1a

TMT and Space-Based Survey Missions

Quasars ASTR 2120 Sarazin. Quintuple Gravitational Lens Quasar

X-ray variability of AGN

AC Fabian, M. Cappi, J Sanders. Cosmic Feedback from AGN

MOS: A critical tool for current & future radio surveys Daniel J.B. Smith, University of Hertfordshire, UK.

NuStar has similar area kev, Astro-H better at E> 80 Kev

Observational Evidence of AGN Feedback

X-ray spectroscopy of nearby galactic nuclear regions

Luminous Quasars and AGN Surveys with ELTs

Lynx and Exoplanet Science. Rachel Osten, STScI & JHU

Microlensing Constraints on Quasar X-ray Emission Regions

Athena Athena+ Towards a European Large X-ray Observatory. Mike Watson University of Leicester. Athena+

Probing the End of Dark Ages with High-redshift Quasars. Xiaohui Fan University of Arizona Dec 14, 2004

Galaxies. Galaxy Diversity. Galaxies, AGN and Quasars. Physics 113 Goderya

The Black Hole in the Galactic Center. Eliot Quataert (UC Berkeley)

The cosmic X ray background: abundance and evolu8on of hidden black holes. R. Gilli (INAF OaBologna) with the XMM CDFS, 4Ms CDFS, COSMOS, WFXT teams

The History of Active Galaxies A.Barger, P. Capak, L. Cowie, RFM, A. Steffen,W-H Wang and Y. Yang

Feeding the Beast. Chris Impey (University of Arizona)

Supermassive Black Hole Formation in Galactic Nuclei

Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna, 27 Ottobre 2011

ROSAT Roentgen Satellite. Chandra X-ray Observatory

CONTENTS AIM OF THE PROJECT. INTRODUCTION: AGNs, XMM-Newton, ROSAT. TECHNIQUES: IDL, SQL, Catalogues RESULTS SUMMARY DESIRED OUTPUTS QUESTIONS

Observing the Formation of Dense Stellar Nuclei at Low and High Redshift (?) Roderik Overzier Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics

Neutron Stars at X-ray Wavelengths: NASA's Constellation-X Mission. Divas Sanwal (JHU/GSFC) Constellation-X NASA GSFC

Investigating Ultraluminous X-ray Sources through multi-wavelength variability, broadband spectra, and theoretical modelling

Radio Properties Of X-Ray Selected AGN

MASSIVE BLACK HOLES AMY REINES IN NEARBY DWARF GALAXIES HUBBLE FELLOW NATIONAL OPTICAL ASTRONOMY OBSERVATROY

Outline: Part II. The end of the dark ages. Structure formation. Merging cold dark matter halos. First stars z t Univ Myr.

Deep Surveys or How We Learn About the Early Universe When We Can t Measure All that Would Be Nice!

AGN Feedback in the Hot Halo of NGC 4649

Quasi-stars and the Cosmic Evolution of Massive Black Holes

Active Galactic Alexander David M Nuclei

Massive black hole formation in cosmological simulations

An AGN census: the contribution of radio survey

The Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey (HerMES) The Evolution of the FIR/SMM Luminosity Function and of the Cosmic SFRD

The perspective of X-ray galaxy clusters with the XIFU/Athena instrument

Formation of z~6 Quasars from Hierarchical Galaxy Mergers

The star-formation history of mass-selected galaxies in the VIDEO survey

The PRIsm MUlti-object Survey (PRIMUS)

A Supermassive Black Hole in the Dwarf Starburst Galaxy Henize Amy Reines Einstein Fellow National Radio Astronomy Observatory

iptf16fnl - a faint and fast TDE in an E+A galaxy

The Powerful Black Hole Wind in the Luminous Quasar PDS 456

Prospects for the direct WHIM detection by Athena

The PLANCK Cluster Catalog:

PoS(extremesky2009)103

X-RAY AND MULTIWAVELENGTH STUDIES OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN THE CHANDRA DEEP FIELDS

Ultraluminous X-ray Sources in Nearby Galaxies

Dark Energy: Measuring the Invisible with X-Ray Telescopes

LSST, Euclid, and WFIRST

Paul Plucinsky on behalf of Randall Smith on behalf of the ESA JAXA NASA IXO team

AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models

EUCLID Legacy with Spectroscopy

The gas-galaxy-halo connection

Transcription:

X-raying High-Redshift AGNs and the First Black Holes: From Chandra to Lynx Niel Brandt, Fabio Vito, the Chandra Deep Fields Team, and the Lynx First Accretion Light Working Group Some Relevant Results from the Deepest X-ray Surveys Constraining SMBH Seeds with Lynx Lynx Brandt & Alexander (2015)

Why X-rays? Robust and energetically significant component of the overall AGN spectral energy distribution. Penetrating and not diluted, allowing discovery of obscured and moderate-luminosity AGNs. Probe accretion / outflow processes in immediate vicinity of the black hole.

Center of the CDF-S 7 Ms exposure 484 arcmin 2 1055 sources 71% AGNs Faintest sources have 1 count per 10.0 days! 0.5-2 kev 2-4 kev 4-7 kev Luo et al. (2017)

X-ray Obscured Protoquasars of Moderate Luminosity at z ~ 4-5 Gas density and temperature for simulated high-redshift protoquasar host Compton-thick AGN at z = 4.76 in strongly star-forming host Li et al. (2007) Obscured CDF-N AGN (M B = -21.4) Gilli et al. (2011) N H ~ 2 x 10 23 cm -2 Vignali et al. (2002)

X-ray Obscured Protoquasars of Moderate Luminosity at z ~ 4-5 High Obscured Fraction (N H > 10 23 cm -2 ) of Chandra Deep Fields AGNs Column Density Distribution of Chandra Deep Fields AGNs Cannot effectively detect absorption below N H = 10 23 cm -2 Vito et al. (2018)

Possible Seeds of First SMBHs SDSS, UKIDSS, etc. Chandra stacking & Lynx Chandra direct detections probe this region Smith et al. (2017)

Stacking: A Romantic Example 3 / 100 second exposure 30 candles - Courtesy of Bret Lehmer 1 / 1000 second exposure Stacked image 30 candles with 1/1000 sec exposure = 3/100 sec

Seeds of First SMBHs 7 Ms Stacking Pushing as faint as possible to constrain first SMBH seeds with Chandra. X-ray stacking of individually undetected galaxies (100-1400 per bin) can provide average X-ray detections to z = 4.5-5.5, and useful upper limits at higher redshifts. Signal appears to be mostly from high-mass X-ray binaries in massive galaxies. Most high-redshift SMBH accretion occurs in short AGN phase continuous low-rate accretion contribution appears small. All Galaxies in Sample 8.2 Gs (265 yr) 2.7 Gs (86 yr) 1.4 Gs (45 yr) Note the Gigasecond stacked exposures! 3.9 Gs (124 yr) 1.3 Gs (41 yr) 0.7 Gs (22 yr) Most Massive Half of Sample Vito et al. (2016)

Seeds of First SMBHs 7 Ms Stacking Pushing as faint as possible to constrain first SMBH seeds with Chandra. X-ray stacking of individually undetected galaxies (100-1400 per bin) can provide average X-ray detections to z = 4.5-5.5, and useful upper limits at higher redshifts. Signal appears to be mostly from high-mass X-ray binaries in massive galaxies. Most high-redshift SMBH accretion occurs in short AGN phase continuous low-rate accretion contribution appears small. Vito et al. (2016) stacking results

Pushing to the Highest Redshifts with Stacking Stacking of Lyman Break Galaxy Samples with 7 Ms CDF-S Vito et al. (2016) JWST will provide large samples at higher redshifts, better redshift identifications, and better removal of low-redshift interlopers. Aim to push Chandra stacking analyses to z ~ 10-15 with the samples of high-redshift galaxies from JWST in the 7 Ms CDF-S (and other fields). Also could stack 21-cm selected regions, or perform cross-correlation analyses.

Lynx X-ray Surveyor - Parameters High-Energy Flagship Mission Concept Under Study by NASA for 2020 Decadal Survey Chandra-like angular resolution 30-50 x effective area of Chandra For HPD < 1, 16 x FOV of Chandra 40 x sensitivity of Chandra

Lynx X-ray Surveyor - Schematic ~ 2 m 2 at 1 kev

Chandra Deep Field-South 7 Ms with Chanda - Actual Data 1 Ms with Lynx HDXI - Simulation Most X-ray sources are z ~ 0.1-4 galaxies Luo et al. (2017) Courtesy Hickox et al.

Relevance of Athena Athena 2028 launch Chandra XMM-Newton ROSAT/Einstein ESA with significant NASA participation Athena will do a great job at generating many fields almost as deep as the Chandra Deep Fields. But, mainly due its limited PSF, it cannot reach the very low X-ray fluxes needed to study the seeds of the first SMBH. Hits source confusion at X-ray fluxes ~ 100 times higher than those of the seeds.

Lynx Survey of SMBH Seeds Chandra XMM-Newton ROSAT/Einstein A Lynx survey of 1 deg 2 to 0.5-2 kev fluxes of 1.1 x 10-19 cgs can plausibly detect ~ 1000 SMBH seeds at z ~ 8-10 to ~ 3 x 10 4 M. Sampling hard 5-20 kev rest-frame X-rays to overcome obscuration effects. Precise yield is uncertain by factors of at least several (e.g., Volonteri, Habouzit, et al.). Lynx Seeds Need ~ 1000 such seeds to derive an X-ray luminosity function (XLF) for them. Survey needs 8.2 Lynx fields of ~ 4 Ms each. Details given in Brandt, Haiman, & Vito report on behalf of the Lynx First Accretion Light working group. Even if instrumentation allowed, difficult to push deeper owing to expected confusion with X-ray binary populations.

Lynx Survey of SMBH Seeds Vikhlinin et al. A Lynx survey of 1 deg 2 to 0.5-2 kev fluxes of 1.1 x 10-19 cgs can plausibly detect ~ 1000 SMBH seeds at z ~ 8-10 to ~ 3 x 10 4 M. Sampling hard 5-20 kev rest-frame X-rays to overcome obscuration effects. Precise yield is uncertain by factors of at least several (e.g., Volonteri, Habouzit, et al.). Need ~ 1000 such seeds to derive an X-ray luminosity function (XLF) for them. Survey needs 8.2 Lynx fields of ~ 4 Ms each. Details given in Brandt, Haiman, & Vito report on behalf of the Lynx First Accretion Light working group. Even if instrumentation allowed, difficult to push deeper owing to expected confusion with X-ray binary populations.

Sites for the Lynx Survey Simulated JWST Deep Field This survey must be sited in regions with ultradeep MIR/NIR/optical data from JWST, WFIRST, LSST, GSMTs, 21 cm, etc. Needed to Aid the X-ray source searching Identify z ~ 7-15 counterparts reliably Measure host stellar masses JWST wide-field survey should be (just) deep enough over ~ 1 deg 2 Likely would target 3-5 fields to minimize cosmic variance effects. Some Good Potential Sites: The Central LSST Deep Drilling Fields

XLF for Light Seeds and Heavy Seeds The behavior of the high-redshift X-ray luminosity function (XLF) at the very faint end will be key for insights into seed-growth models: Light Seeds: Growth should lead to a large number of faint high-redshift AGN fueled by accretion onto low-mass BH steep XLF. Heavy Seeds: AGNs can more easily reach luminosities close to L *, producing a flatter faint end of XLF. But seed mass, Eddington-ratio distribution, and occupation fraction can be traded-off against each other to give similar XLFs (e.g., Volonteri et al. 2017).

Using XLF + Hosts to Study Seeds The Lynx XLF alone cannot not determine seed masses - utilize additional information such as their host stellar masses. Light seeds: The ~ 3 x 10 4 M black hole was assembled from many stellar-mass black holes, and a larger stellar cluster (M * ~ 2 x 10 7 M ) is needed to make them (cf. gas blow out, black-hole ejections, etc.). Heavy seeds: The black hole can consume most of the gas in its halo, so it will have only a small stellar cluster around it (M * < 10 6 M ). This cluster s light will be subdominant compared to black-hole emission. The hope is that both XLF + host information together can discriminate light seeds vs. heavy seeds.

The End